October 21, 2014

Until Buyers Like The Price, It’s Going To Sit

The Palm Beach Daily News reports from Florida. “The number of demolition permits and new-home building permits issued by the town has soared over the past couple of years — and most of those are for projects on the North End. The frenzy has left many would-be home buyers and spec developers struggling to find suitable properties. ‘I note that (tear-down houses in) the current spec inventory — few that there are — are priced at or above $1,200 per square foot. Some of the new ones already announced by other brokers are well above $ 1,300 per square foot,’ said the Corcoran Group’s Bill Yahn. ‘To reward the developer for his effort and risk, a finished home on a $3 million site would likely be priced approaching $7 million. New homes priced in the $6 millions may become a thing of the past after 2015.’”

The Pioneer Press in Minnesota. “Home builders, consider yourself warned. A report commissioned by the Metropolitan Council says there are enough single-family homes in the metro area right now to last until 2040. The report says that aging baby boomers, fewer households with children, and changing tastes will flip the housing market around: More people will live in apartments and townhomes in transit-friendly developments. ‘I am giving communities the heads-up,’ said the author of the report, Arthur C. Nelson, professor of urban planning and real estate development at the University of Arizona. ‘I am telling them not to plan for any more of these.’”

“But they certainly are. Developers in Dakota, Washington and suburban Ramsey counties are building — or planning — thousands of the homes that Nelson says will become obsolete. The report is controversial because, if true, it means a glut of these homes will force down their value. John Lockner sells homes in Woodbury for RE/MAX Results — and sales are booming. ‘As long as there is market demand, the single-family home is what builders will be wedded to,’ said Lockner, a former president of the St. Paul Area Association of Realtors.”

The Arizona Republic. “Metro Phoenix’s housing market continues to slow. Sales and prices dipped slightly in September, according to the Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service’s latest Stat report. What’s particularly interesting is the median price of houses listed for sale during September was $224,800 compared with a median price of $215,000 in August. Could it be that prices will tick up a bit in November?”

“‘There were no surprises in September,’ said real-estate analyst Tom Ruff of the Information Market, a division of ARMLS. ‘Home prices are stable, and anticipated declines in October can be attributed to modest downward pricing pressure as well as seasonal patterns.’”

The Deseret News in Utah. “While the overall Utah economy has bounced back admirably since the depths of the Great Recession, the local housing market has yet to rebound to prerecession levels, a new study published by the University of Utah’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research showed. The report found that the Beehive State experienced the slowest housing recovery of any post-World War II cycle, with residential construction having only recovered 55 percent.”

“‘This was unlike any other cycle,’ said Jim Wood, executive director of the bureau. ‘In no other housing cycle have we had housing prices decline. ‘We’ve had one or two years separated with years of growth, but we haven’t had a declining year since the 1960s. In terms of new residential construction, the prerecession peak was clearly too high, but the subdued demand and slow recovery is worrisome. Thirty-three of 50 states are down in single-family home (construction) this year.’”

Steamboat Pilot in Colorado. “A year ago, the Steamboat Pilot & Today’s classifieds section listed a one-bedroom apartment available for $700 per month, a two-bedroom for $1,150 and a three-bedroom, two-bath home for $1,550. The prices weren’t rare finds but representative of 40 other listings, including those at Mountain Village and large complexes across town. The rental landscape today is far bleaker for the prospective tenant, and last Sunday only six properties were listed for rent in Steamboat — including one-bedrooms for $800 and $1,200 apiece, two-bedrooms for $1,400 and $1,600 and high-end three- and four-bedrooms for $3,000 and $2,150 each.”

“Steamboat Springs City Council member and economist Scott Ford said while he didn’t disagree with the idea that the rental market is tight, the survey results may only represent a small sample of rentals. ‘This could be the tyranny of small numbers,’ Ford said.”

The Centreville Independent in Virginia. “Last month I ended my article stating that inventory is up and it is a great time to buy. I’m going to continue with that theme for October. The number of homes on the market in Centreville, Clifton and west Fairfax (22033) has increased across the board since April of this year. I have a chart on my website that illustrates these data for the number of Active Listings quite well. It is dramatic with the uptick in inventory that began with the entry of the Spring market and continued increase as more people placed their properties for sell and the demand for these properties decreased.”

“With more homes on the market and Sellers waiting longer to have their properties sell, right now is a fantastic time for a Buyer to get into the market. Anecdotally, I had the honor of taking one of my military relocation clients out in the Springfield/Kingstowne area this weekend and we had over 60 properties to choose from in their price range. It is a nice change to not be in a multiple offer situation with a buyer.”

The Greenwich Time in Connecticut. “After a strong showing in 2013, the real estate market in Greenwich’s backcountry has hit a slump this year, as houses linger on the selling block for longer periods of time and the number of sales declines. Backcountry homes on the market at the end of the third quarter were active for an average of 295 days, up 40.5 percent from 2013, when the average time was 210 days, according to a third-quarter report released by Houlihan Lawrence’s Greenwich office.”

“The glut of homes is likely due to the strength of the backcountry market in 2013, said David Haffenreffer, manager of Houlihan Lawrence’s Greenwich brokerage. ‘Any time you have a strong year in sales — and you saw that with the number of units that sold last year — you’ll see new inventory come to market, because sellers think it’s a good market for their home,’ Haffenreffer said.”

“Julianne Ward, a real estate agent with Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, said she thinks buyers are willing to take their time, waiting for price cuts before diving in. ‘If you really want to sell your house, you can in any market and at any time. You just have to be flexible with your buyers, because the buyers are the ones who are making the market, and if they don’t like it at a particular price, they’re not going to buy it. And until they like it, it’s going to sit there,’ Ward said. ‘It used to be there was an overabundance of buyers and not enough houses, and now it’s the opposite,’ she said.”




RSS feed

34 Comments »

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 04:36:02

“there are enough single-family homes in the metro area right now to last until 2040.”

Given the fact that there are 25 million excess empty and defaulted houses in the US and another 35 million just beginning to empty, this is an under statement. And the supply is endless in the sunbelt states.

 
Comment by taxpayers
2014-10-21 05:08:34

any positive counties left?

Austin,tx area ,maybe

more villas style housing would be nice- ugly on the outside,but very nice inside.

Comment by Avocado
2014-10-21 08:24:19

The central coast of CA is still up for the year and anything under $400k is getting multiple offers. 2 bdrm, old,tiny places rent for $1600 in SLO. Hence…

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 08:50:03

You’re assertion doesn’t align with the reality that housing demand is cratering in 54 of 58 counties in California.

There are no “multiple offers” for rapidly depreciating houses in CA.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-10-21 12:54:49

2 bdrm, old,tiny places rent for $1600 in SLO. Hence… ??

yeah…We spend a decent amount of time there and you are exactly right…And, its $1600. per month IF you can find it…

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 15:28:45

Here’s 100+ 2 bedroom places under $1600 in San Luis Obispo.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-10-21 06:20:12

“In terms of new residential construction, the prerecession peak was clearly too high, but the subdued demand and slow recovery is worrisome. Thirty-three of 50 states are down in single-family home (construction) this year.’”

Karma bites.

 
Comment by Aqius
2014-10-21 06:27:15

“Last month I ended my article stating that inventory is up and it is a great time to buy. I’m going to continue with that theme for October. The number of homes on the market . . . ”

( blah blah blah, Charlie Brown … insert reason to buy from realtors long list …. blah )

Translation from happy talk: It’s always a GREAT time to conduct a real estate transaction so us leeches can make our commission & the govt gets more rooted potted plants to pay for fees, taxes, salaries)

We have this bloggers local counterpart: Julie “shiny face” Jalone !

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-10-21 06:31:25

This charm offensive is a bit too obvious:

‘Federal Reserve officials sent a warning shot across Wall Street on Monday, telling bank executives they must do more to curb excessive risk-taking and improve employee behavior at their firms or face stiff repercussions, including being broken into smaller pieces.’

‘Federal Reserve Gov. Daniel Tarullo and Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley, in closed-door speeches Monday to bank executives gathered at the New York Fed, said Wall Street must clean up its behavior and image, according to copies of their remarks provided by the Fed.’

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-banks-shape-risk-breakup-235800815.html

Closed door speeches. A privately owned Federal Reserve, meets privately with the biggest investment banks, some of whom own part of the “regulator”. Are we supposed to be impressed? Recently we heard that Yellen met with some little people and actually listened while they told her about their problems. One article also told us she doesn’t make as much money as others at the Fed. And she’s recently been quoted worrying about inequality. You are on a roll Janet.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-10-21 07:51:03

Recently we heard that Yellen met with some little people and actually listened while they told her about their problems.

When they told her they had to work 3 jobs to make ends meet, did she smile and say “How uniquely American!”

 
Comment by BearCat
2014-10-21 09:54:23

I thought the whole point of Zero Interest rates was to encourage risk taking?

Comment by scdave
2014-10-21 12:58:42

I thought the whole point of Zero Interest rates was to encourage risk taking ??

It is….Here is the problem though…The only ones that get that cheap money are the ones that don’t need it but borrow it buy the boat loads anyway to buy & build anything that is a store house of value…Drove by Redwood city the other day and there were five cranes in the air…incredible…

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-10-21 12:13:13

Has she promised not to take too many $250,000 speaking engagements when she retires from this gig?

 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-10-21 06:33:53

We are in a holding patter until after the election. Then prices will hasten their decline and more crookedness will be applied.

No one cares about the right thing, only the right thing for me.

 
Comment by taxpayers
2014-10-21 06:35:27

Federal Housing Finance Agency Unveils Plan to :
Loosen Rules on Mortgages
Since credit remains tight for many borrowers (?), a federal regulator is trying to ease rules to put the housing market back on track.
The New York Times

Comment by rj chicago
Comment by scdave
2014-10-21 13:00:12

Ritholtz is correct through the lens I look through…

Comment by rj chicago
2014-10-21 13:40:25

Agree in his posts from outside sources - the deal is (and I like Barry’s mind) he does have a bias that I don’t always agree with when he is writing under his own moniker.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2014-10-21 14:23:22

I enjoy reading his material also…

A good friend & I were talking a few days ago about the lending environment right now and who appears to be benifiting the most from the ultra low rates…Clearly, we both concluded, it was the wealthy…

We then asked each other, if you were able to borrow money at 2.5-3% would you and how much would you barrow ??

A; #1…Yes I would…

A; #2…As much as I could…

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2014-10-22 02:03:27

That’s what I did in ‘08, ‘09, & ‘10. Borrowed over $2 million, secured (non-recourse) by real estate. Seems to be working out well. It cash flows and the debt is being paid off at a nice clip. I’m not rich. I work a regular job and I take care of the houses and residents outside of normal working hours.

Renters get a nice place to live with a fair and responsive owner in houses that were otherwise sitting vacant in bank inventory. Win/win….in part due to cheap money at sub 4%.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-22 02:08:45

You should have stuck with refrigerator magnets J._Fraud.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 15:30:31

BR carries water for the lie machine. And you clowns eat it up. LOL

 
 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2014-10-21 07:46:02

not a HA kinda day

1,925.80 Up 21.79(1.14%) 10:44AM EDT

Comment by Jingle Male
2014-10-22 02:05:58

HA, Ha, ha, hahahaha…..HA can only be ha-happy if he believes the world is CRATERING. HA is strangely perverse….

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-22 04:44:08

Hold onto your cash and get out of debt J._Fraud. You’ll thank me later.

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 08:04:13

Washington, DC Sale Prices Crater 15% YoY; Housing Demand Plummets

http://www.zillow.com/washington-dc-20008/home-values/

 
Comment by cactus
2014-10-21 08:14:07

LAS VEGAS, Oct 20 (Reuters) - The regulator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said on Monday it was developing rules to let Americans buy homes with down payments as low as 3 percent, part of a push to boost access to credit.

Mel Watt, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, pledged the new guidelines for the two taxpayer-owned firms would be “sensible” without putting the safety of financial markets at risk.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-21 08:19:49

Nothing new. Fannie has been financing suckers with 3.5% down for years.

Comment by Jingle Male
2014-10-22 02:08:49

I think you mean FHA. 3.5% down is an FHA program.

 
 
Comment by Puggs
2014-10-21 09:32:13

That just defined “insanity”.

 
 
Comment by Doom
2014-10-22 03:08:08

RE agents already on the phone to buyers 3% down, lower standards for qualification, means the young couple can now buy a 1m dollar house with 30k down, play rich for two years then either try to sell it for 1.2m or walk away.

When you have little money in the pot, it all but ensures that again many will just leave the house if it doesn’t sell in 6 months.

What we all want to hear is tax breaks for small and large companies, loosen regulations on them, give them incentives not to flee to overseas ventures, instead we get another sub- prime problem in two years?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-22 04:46:49

3.5% down has been around for years.

Dump that house of yours while you still might find a buyer and take your losses and get on with life.

Comment by Allan
2014-10-22 19:27:00

Do you recommend renting for now? Also, when is the next crash?

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-10-23 04:48:49

Prices are falling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post