June 15, 2006

Bit Bucket And Craigslist Finds For Thursday June 15, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas and links here!




RSS feed | Trackback URI

188 Comments »

Comment by Salinasron
2006-06-15 05:16:39

I think I just felt an earthquake here at about 5:24 Salinas time. Just a big jolt, not one of those long rolling ones that increase in intensity over time. Maybe I was just dreaming and it was a herd of RE agents jumping into the bay.

Comment by NjGal
2006-06-15 05:22:10

Unfortunately, there was a real earthquake, 4.7. Realtors still hanging around:)

 
 
Comment by Max
2006-06-15 06:55:11

I woke up from a jolt, but was like “eh” (shrugged), and went back to sleep. Only watching news I realized there was a quake.

Comment by glorgau
2006-06-15 07:05:15

Funny, I woke up around 5:30 this morning (rare for me), but hadn’t noticed anything.

Around San Mateo - halfway up the peninsula.

 
Comment by bottomfeeder1
2006-06-15 07:29:12

we are over due i survived northride i was 1/4 mile from epicenter.i say bring on the big one.

Comment by rent2home
2006-06-15 07:59:49

No Please! We Only want the the housing price collapsing not the house :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 10:27:33

An earthquake just got posted in the financial markets.
…The US Treasury reported that net inflows into US assets of more than one-year duration totalled just $46.7bn in April, the lowest figure for a year. This was not only below March inflows of $70.4bn and consensus forecasts for a reading of $60bn plus, it was also insufficient to cover April’s trade deficit of $63.4bn….
http://tinyurl.com/hb6r4

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 10:28:46

No wonder the PPT is working so hard today…

 
 
 
Comment by The Hopper
2006-06-15 05:24:58

Is anyone else noticing the huge pricing disparity? I keep track of one pretty small area (Ladera Ranch in the OC) and I’m seeing 100k swings on 1600 sq ft townhouses. The best part is–the ones at the bottom end still aren’t selling.

I don’t want to waste people’s time and actually go to each house, but from the photos (and its a pretty new area) they all look about the same.

Could this mean that even the OC could drop faster than I had hoped?

BuyMoreHouses.com

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 06:29:42

I’m seeing the same thing here on our high priced stuff. Big adjustments down, no takers. I’m think people are finally stepping back and saying to themselves “600, 700, 800 thousand? Damn!…….that’s a lot of friggin’ money!” No one even questioned it when the mania was raging. Why? Because it was something they weren’t going to keep. It was all about turning it for a profit. Now they’re thinking “Jeez, I may have to pay this back.”

Comment by sigalarm
2006-06-15 07:27:19

I am seeing that many markets are starting to take price cuts. It has a small impact on the median so far. Some sellers are getting motivated though. I will be able to post data later this weekend if folks want to see it. Very few markets have shown a price increase from 2 weeks / 1 month ago now. This is a big change.

Comment by huggybear
2006-06-15 07:41:15

sigalarm - I vote for you displaying this data. I’ve found your past data interesting as well. Keep up the good work!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by rent2home
2006-06-15 08:05:58

And others sold their old house for sky high price and added 200k to get to upgrade to a bigger house.

 
 
 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-15 05:33:18

Personally, if I was a flipper I don’t think I would be highlighting that fact in my ad.
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/rfs/171704483.html

And isn’t there some old real estate adage about over-improving for the neighborhood? I guess when you hit the deck to the sound of gunshots outside, you will enjoy those travartine floors up-close and personal.
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org//rfs/170366915.html

Comment by Mo Money
2006-06-15 06:00:09

Instant Equity ! That’s right folks, step right up, we’re giving money away !

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 06:21:21

That one really f-ing gets me. “Prices below appraised value - Instant equity!!”. I can’t decide who needs to be shot, the realtor who serving up this crap, or the person the person that buts it.

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 06:23:45

I need more coffee……I meant “the person that buys into it.” I’ll refrain fom posting until I’m properly caffeinated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2006-06-15 06:42:49

nvmtgbrkr, Can you give an update on what is happening in the Reno/Tahoe area with regard to sales/inventory,etc? Thanks

 
Comment by Robert Cote
2006-06-15 06:55:16

Letting the blood levels build up in your alcohol & caffeine circulatory system can be dangerous. Take immediate steps.

Anyway, this always gets me. Repeat until understood: it is impossible to buy below comps. When you sign the check you ARE the comp.

 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 07:05:14

It’s dying here. Inventory increase has been about what you’ve seen on average for Western regions, and that is 50% - 100% jumps. I think we’ve started seeing the price reductions quicker than most. I know in a lot of places it’s still a stare-down between seller and buyer. But here, from what I’ve seen so far this year, we have already lost 5%-10% from our market top. Almost nothing in the 500K+ is moving. The only activity has been in the under 300K+ range because we still have some of that here in the out-lying areas, but in comparison to last year, I’d say sales aren’t even 25% of what they were in that range. We’re seeing builders, for the first time in a long time, list their product on MLS, and most of that is their cancellations (plenty of those). I’d have to say too that for first time I can feel the panic, it’s become perceptible. This thing really picks up steam after July 4th. I’m really concerned for this area. You take the real estate boom out of the 395 corridor (Gardnerville - Reno) and you’ve got big-time trouble. Like so many areas, take out the real estate and everything it generates, and we don’t have that many high paying jobs.

 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:28:35

NNBRKR;….Good info…I would also be interested in your update occasionally…I have sniffed around the Genoa area several times but prices just got tooooo crazy…

 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 07:46:09

scdave, Genoa is a real nice area, but it’s toast. Classsic example of the high price stuff I mentioned just sitting. 4 years ago I could of bought a 3000sqft house on the links at Genoa Lakes for about 500K. Today they’re going for 1 mil - 1.3 mil. A bunch of inventory recently stacked up out there. You want to know what’s crazy? A couple of the areas small time builders have, not one, but several million dollar plus spec homes out there just sitting, and have been for months. Talk about leaving your ass flagging in the wind! I expect that area to see 20% come off the top in the next 12 months, and further down from there.

 
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-15 07:50:54

Thanks nnvmtgbrkr, that’s an outstanding observation.

You’re at least the 2nd person on this blog that I recall predicting something BIG for the 4th of July. If these predictions come true what a strange contrast of emotions that day will be for many homedebtors.

Imagine: Watching the fireworks while at the same time coming to the realization they’ve lost their “instant equity.” I visualize the poor slob on the “Suzanne” commercial holding a sparkler with tears silently rolling down his cheeks.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-06-15 11:05:42

Anyway, this always gets me. Repeat until understood: it is impossible to buy below comps. When you sign the check you ARE the comp.

Excellent Robert. A new tactic.

“So, you’ll sell this to me $460,000? Below recent comps?”

“Yup! Just like the ad says! Below comps!”

“Ok, I’ll give you $455K for it.”

“What?!!! You just said $460K”.

“Yes, but that became the new comp. Now I can only give you $455K. That’s the new below comp price.”

“Sigh. I guess I can take that.”

“Hmmm, I’m sorry, it will have to be $450K.”

“What? Again?”

“Sorry, but these comps are killing you.”

 
Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 11:46:12

Bwwwaaahhhhaaa that’s funny

 
Comment by auger-inn
2006-06-15 12:49:07

Nvmtgbrkr, Thanks for the update!

 
 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-06-15 06:26:29

Wait a minute!

“$749,900 with one (1) parking spot & one(1)large storage
unit included. One additional (next to it) parking spot and
storage space available that was purchased with the condo.”

Followed by:

“Brand new, just settled. Appraised at $840,000 with
2 parking spots & 2 storage units.”

So the appraisal includes the extra parking and storage, but the $749,900 does not? The extra stuff is “available” for…. let me guess… $90,100? :-)

But fear not, just wait a couple of months (or weeks?) and he’ll throw all that in for free, assuming he has a big enough certified check to bring to closing, that is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by VaBeyatch
2006-06-15 12:05:47

If the one parking spot is uncovered, you could get a used mechanics lift for $3000ish and install it at the parking space. Park vehicle #1, lift it, then park vehicle #2 under it. I just saved you $87,000.

The neighborhood association would probably flip out, but it would be fun to watch.

 
 
Comment by Sammy schadenfreude
2006-06-15 12:20:06

Not to mention, you’d have to be a few IQ points below “moron” to trust most of these appraisals, given the rampant fraud and collusion between mortage brokers, realtors, and appraisers willing to “hit a number” to seal the deal. I’ll decide what it’s worth TO ME — much less than what Flipper Boy is asking.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2006-06-15 06:16:49

I call the over improvement of a property with granite and stainless steel in high gunfire zones “flipper’s contagion”.

Comment by Sammy schadenfreude
2006-06-15 12:24:45

He’d probably have an easier time selling it if the upgrades included Kevlar panels and gun turrets facing the open-air drug markets outside.

 
 
Comment by talon
2006-06-15 07:38:10

“GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE INSTANT EQUITY RIGHT AWAY”

Well, that’s certainly a plus… I HATE having to wait for my instant equity.

 
Comment by Parallax
2006-06-15 14:19:41

That “view” of the Washington Monument cracks me up.

 
Comment by Anon in DC
2006-06-15 18:38:13

This is a “transistional” neighborhood. Lots of public housing / projects within 2 block. “Interesting characters” e.g. homeless looking men hang around all day.

 
 
Comment by Brandon
2006-06-15 05:38:36

I finally became a proud house renter in the Boise area! A new 2b/2ba patio home for 895 a month- including the HOA fees and lawn service. The same floor plan across the street is for sale at 199k. Even with 20% down, payments would be over $1,000 a month to buy the place

The bubble has created some steals if you don’t mind renting. Why buy if you can rent for 3/4 cost?

Comment by arroyogrande
2006-06-15 06:17:48

Or even 1/2 the cost in the high-bubble zones.

Comment by Max
2006-06-15 06:59:31

Here in Bay Area it can easily be 1/4 the cost.

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:30:10

Or Less……

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 07:17:52

Actually, that disparity is not that drastic. I’m renting a house for $975 that would sell for 375K. That’s an over $1000. A friend of mine who a talked into “getting out” is renting a home for $1400 that would sell for 525K. Now we’re talking over $1500 difference. I recently found a rental home out at our local country club that rented for $1900. This home would have sold for about 900K at the top. You do the math. Any way you figure it, it’s ridiculous.

Comment by Brandon
2006-06-15 09:46:24

I’m happy with saving a few hundred bucks. While Boise has a bubble- its nothing like other areas.

 
 
Comment by SLO Bear
2006-06-15 11:39:51

I rent a $1,000,000 for $2100/month - about 2 miles from the Pacific Ocean - 3000 sq.ft. - on a golf course - built in 2003.

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:52:22

“Why buy if you can rent for 3/4 cost?”

To capture the 20% YOY gains forever, silly! At least if you live in The OC…

Comment by robin
2006-06-15 20:12:59

Mr. Watts only “guaranteed us” 15% What do you know that I don’t?

Comment by Bill
2006-06-15 22:45:20

You must not have gotten the lastest market research from Suzeanne.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by knockwurst
2006-06-15 05:40:59

There’s an editorial in the NY Times about the possible consequences of foreign holdings of US dollars. It isn’t about real estate, but it relates to a lot of discussion on this board about the “world economy floating on a crest of cheap credit.”

http://tinyurl.com/l387q

Comment by Max
2006-06-15 07:01:49

In July Russian ruble becomes fully convertible and Russian oil & gas will be sold in rubles. The country is the #1 world’s exporter of oil & gas.

 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-15 07:28:39

Important post. Everyone who is interested in the future of interest rates needs to understand this. The US needs to keep it’s debt attractive. And if foreign investors decide to dump all that debt, these so called lousy long term interest rates will be something to be longed for in the near future.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:43:25

Concerned parties have worried about this scenario of foreigners “dumping” US long-term debt since at least the late 1980s (cf. Dr. Ravi Batra — “The Great Depression of 1990″ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Batra). How is it that such a persistent long-term risk manages to never come to fruition?

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 08:46:44

…”Similarly, the U.S. dollar has defied gravity far longer than experts expected. A new study from a team of economists led by Richard Clarida of Columbia University calculates that the U.S. current-account deficit, now almost 7% of gross domestic product, is substantially above the 2%-to-3% level that should have triggered a large-scale dollar depreciation. Yet the greenback has stayed relatively strong against a broad basket of currencies, dropping by only 6% over the past two years. Big-time investors such as Warren Buffett and Bill Gross are betting that’ll change….”
http://tinyurl.com/lrua9 Business week June 15,2006

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by john doe
2006-06-15 09:14:32

2 Words: Debt Monetization

and 2 More Words: Nothing Else.

the first one has not changed but gotten worse, and the second one changed with the Eurozone unified currency. As Granditch puts it:

“The only one who doesn’t know that the US Dollar is dead is the US dollar.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:45:34

Kwurst;…Outstanding read particularly with the historical relationship to the 70’s….

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:49:58

Stucco;…I think the article states it clearly…The central banks are afraid to dump the dollar thereby driving the dollar down further and cutting the face value of there holdings…

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:52:30

That sounds right. The dollar has become “too big to fail” so far as our foreign creditors are concerned.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 08:49:18

Suzanne says “Buy dollars they never go down!”

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 09:25:57

By Adrienne Carter and Mara DerHovanesian

Two Big Bets Against the Buck
Why Warren Buffett and PIMCO’s William Gross say a slide is inevitable

…Not Buffett and Gross. When it comes to the dollar, they’re big bears. Buffett has argued for some years that the U.S. current account deficit, which hit a record $805 billion in 2005, would hurt the dollar. Gross agrees and adds that the U.S. economy is in for a rough patch as the housing market “cracks” and foreign investors lose their appetite for dollars. …”
http://tinyurl.com/rhfeo

 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 10:18:22

Yeah HOZ;….I listen to Gross very carefully….Buffett is just diversifying…Gross is a Bond Guy….

 
 
Comment by Moopheus
2006-06-15 08:08:41

And China, despite some worries about the dollar, still seems pretty reluctant to let the yuan float out of a tight range. So they need to hold a lot of dollars to keep that from happening. So we can either have a strong(er) dollar, or let the foreign exchange mechanism level out trade imbalances. Either way, someone is going to be unhappy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:45:07

“This created a nightmarish prospect of the United States losing control of its own currency, and in 1971 the Fed chairman, Arthur Burns, negotiated a deal with the European and Japanese central banks. The deal was that they would return to America the dollars they acquired in their own economies, and the Fed would invest the money on their behalf, in absolutely safe government securities, without charge and at the best rates.”

I wonder if the lense of history will view this move by Burns as the beginning-of-the-end for US dollar hegemony. One might argue the Volcker era was merely an interuption in a long-term trend initiated by the regime change to repatriate foreign $US holdings into our debt securities. This policy change took place before many folks were talking about the problems of “moral hazard” or “systemic risk”…

 
Comment by robin
2006-06-15 20:20:33

Do I understand that under the current regime we have added about $1 Trillion in international debt in the last 3 years? If we got it at 1 to 1 1/2%, we’re kickin’ ass!

 
 
Comment by SLO Bear
2006-06-15 05:48:57

I have a quick question Ben:

Do you ever sleep?

Comment by Joe
2006-06-15 06:18:26

With the kind of money Ben is making on clicks and advertising - who can sleep?!

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-06-15 06:45:03

I hope he gets rich! He has done a great service to our country with this website!

 
Comment by rms
2006-06-15 07:29:26

You can donate too!

Comment by moqui
2006-06-15 09:24:25

doubt he’ll get rich from this. I think donating a little here and there is a good idea (cheapest education I’ve ever recieved)

Also, I think he ought to form a 501 c or start a church…there’s enough fruitloops and crazy hippies in Sedona that the IRS probably won’t even flag him.

disclaimer, I’m not an accountant if it’s not obvious already

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:00:42

Ben’s tireless work, to keep his blog troll-free and at the very pinnacle of the housing-bear sites, has amazed me ever since I started following it around March ‘05. I do not recall a single day without a thread, except perhaps when he had to change servers/services. That means ZERO vacation days for Ben Jones, or darn close to it, if my memory’s bad. You betcha contributions are in order. Cheapest education, relative to its top-notch quality, that I’ve ever received — and fun, to boot.

 
 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-15 06:10:18

I agree, this place is like 7-11… ;). I love 7-11.

Just curious, what is “bird dogging”?
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org//rfs/171524495.html

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 06:49:53

If you sent a friend to buy a car from a saleman you knew, you would be a bird dog and the salesman would give you $50 - $100 for the referral. I am not sure if the Craigslist Ad violates RESPA, since, my understanding,( -which is probably wrong )is that RESPA does not allow referral payments.

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 08:28:29

No the ad doesn’t violate RESPA, what you have here is what’s called the strawman purchase. I’m kind of surprised that this is starting so soon into the downturn or maybe this market is farther down the toilet than I thought.

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 08:51:27

I misread and thought he was looking for a referral fee.
“Home is being whoesaled by an investor, I am bird dogging it, and would appreciate a finders fee”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by DC_Too
2006-06-15 06:51:03

It means to pursue with undivided attention. That place looks Soooo McTownhouse. In Ashburn, to boot. Ick. Race you over there MeShell…..

 
Comment by NOVAwatcher
2006-06-15 07:32:19

Here’s another one in Loudoun.

http://tinyurl.com/qnjvu

They are looking to sell for $380k. Median price (Zip Realty guesstimate) in this area is around $430k. The high sold in November 2005 for $460k.

In comparison, the last time we saw prices of around $380k was in November 2004! Also, these places sold new for around $180k in 2000.

Looks like prices are dropping faster than I thought. I feel sorry for the people that bought after 2002 (the last time prices matched the long term trend: http://tinyurl.com/mld22)

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:54:09

An example would a real estate investor hiring his $20K-month assistant to hunt high-and-low for FBs willing to part with their underwater homes at a deep discount in exchange for hard cash.

 
Comment by Bluzer
2006-06-15 08:10:15

It means the house is a ‘dog’ and you’d be a ‘bird’-brain to consider it.

 
Comment by Crash and Burn
2006-06-15 12:11:23

Bird dogging is a hunting term. When you hunt with a dog the dog does the hard work. The dog finds the bird and stops and points to the target. Upon command the dog flushes the bird and the hunter shoots. Please keep in mind that in this case you are the bird.

Comment by Sammy schadenfreude
2006-06-15 12:28:03

Or Dick Cheney’s hunting companion.

 
 
 
Comment by voltron
2006-06-15 06:19:23

There was an article from forbes on yahoo finance about “The 5 Tax Myths of Home Ownership”

http://biz.yahoo.com/brn/060608/18989.html

Myth number 5 is that if your house goes down in value, you can write off the loss. You can’t. It’s considered personal property, like your TV, which depreciates, even though property is clearly being bought speculatively. But they tax you if the value goes up (above a minimum)

as my wife says, “If the value goes down, you lose, if the value goes up, you lose!”

 
Comment by fred hooper
2006-06-15 06:19:57

Related information from Reuters:
“Central banks to add MBS, agencies, gold-report”
http://tinyurl.com/gevbp

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-15 07:39:45

I was under the impression they were already doing this. I sure hope it doesn’t make our current situation worse (longer, stronger credit bubble). :(

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:50:35

My guess is that this announcement is CYA, to legitimize a practice that is already in play, before it comes to light…

 
 
 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-15 06:25:55

Voltron, interesting article, thanks.

 
Comment by Curt
2006-06-15 06:28:49

I believe the end of the housing boom is at hand. Therefore, I am unloading all my shares of International Granite.

 
Comment by Karl
2006-06-15 06:34:28

From Madison, WI - Renting for another year, found several condo rentals (I believe “rentaminums” was the term?) in my price range (decided to go with nice apartment complex across the street from work with several amenities), but these really stuck out.

Built as Condos In 2005. Now For Rent!
http://madison.craigslist.org/apa/169128912.html

Same location, 2 Condo Rentals, $50 apart
http://madison.craigslist.org/apa/170819907.html
http://madison.craigslist.org/apa/170815659.html

House prices in my limited range (under 200,000) are starting to come down in small bits - a few thousand here, five thousand there - nothing like it was last year and I think we still have a way to go…

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 06:44:35

Now that they have a solid currency - Russia has to find a symbol for the ruble since foreign banks would rather own the Ruble than the dollar.
“As Russia’s financial health grows ever more robust and the ruble continues its aggressive climb against the dollar, Russians are becoming increasingly proud of their national currency…the ruble, which has been in existence for over 800 years, has yet to acquire an official symbol.”
Moscow Times 6/15/2006
http://tinyurl.com/pfhy

Comment by Max
2006-06-15 07:04:55

I still don’t understand why long-term USD rates are so low, especially in light of these developments.

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 07:31:04

IMHO these articles from Japan Times sums up the world situation.
“…Brokers said investors were increasingly concerned that additional interest rate hikes by the U.S. Federal Reserve could slow down the warming U.S. economy, impacting one of the main engines of global growth….”
http://tinyurl.com/ovxmk
and
“…The upgrade in its position on price trends has been interpreted by the market as a sign the government is edging closer to officially declaring an end of seven years of deflation and could encourage the Bank of Japan to end its “zero-interest-rate” policy in the near future.

“We can say deflationary pressure is waning,” said a government official who briefed reporters on the report….”
http://tinyurl.com/m4ujm
and
“The market consensus is for ending the ‘zero-interest-rate’ policy in July or August, but I don’t think (it should happen then),” Kozo Yamamoto, chairman of a subcommittee of the LDP’s Research Commission on the Financial and Banking System, said in a speech….”
http://tinyurl.com/opakz
As long as Japan loans money at zero interest rate the world wide asset bubble can continue - however, Japan is tightening its lending policies which caused the emerging market crash last month. The world is now entering a phase of spiraling increases in interest rates The US in .25 increments, the ECB in .25 increments, BOC in .115 increments. Japan will raise its interest rates, when they do June’s lows will seem like mountain peaks in November.

 
Comment by motepug
2006-06-15 08:19:01

Rates are low because foreign banks, central banks, etc are buying long term bonds. High bond prices equal low yields.

In addition, the Fed “repo’s” bonds on huge scale, ie. they print money and buy the government bonds. Neat trick, huh? And they do it to the tune of billions of dollars per week.

Here’s the quote. You can dig the numbers out yourself from the Fed’s weekly reports. This guy is hugely amusing!

The full link is:

http://www.kitco.com/ind/Daughty/jun072006.html

“Things are getting back to normal, and by the alarm bells ringing in the Mogambo Stinking Hole Of Fear (MSHOF) in the backyard, I know that the Federal Reserve is back increasing Total Fed Credit. Sure enough, I quickly find out that they created another $4.1 billion last week. This was at the same time as the Treasury printed up, in actual cash, another $4.3 billion, which is fourteen bucks for every man, woman and child in America.

For good measure (I suppose), the Fed bought up $2 billion in government debt last week, too, blatantly committing the ultimate fraud; creating money to buy government debt for itself, which is then (supposedly) turned over to the Treasury. ”

http://www.kitco.com/ind/Daughty/jun142006.html

Comment by john doe
2006-06-15 09:19:43

The Mogambo Guru is a voice of reason in the ever-increasing din of “financial experts”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:18:02

“For good measure (I suppose), the Fed bought up $2 billion in government debt last week, too, blatantly committing the ultimate fraud; creating money to buy government debt for itself, which is then (supposedly) turned over to the Treasury.”

As noted by Brian S. Wesbury in a June 6 op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal (Economic Rehab), “Printing money cannot possibly create wealth; if it could, counterfeiting would be legal.”

Further thoughtful remarks on this issue are given here:

http://www.mises.org/story/843

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:09:32

It should be a “B.”

After a couple of centuries, they finally pulled the ruble out of the rubble.

 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-15 06:46:35

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-apartmentLandlords Bullied L.A. Tenants Out to Gentrify Apartments, Suit Sayss15jun15,0,1691440.story?coll=la-home-headlines

“he Los Angeles city attorney’s office said Wednesday that it had filed suit against a group of property owners, including the Chans’ landlord, accusing them of pushing out rent-control tenants so they could upgrade the units and rent them back out….”

The City Council is considering rules to slow a recent explosion in apartments being converted into condominiums, particularly in parts of the Westside and San Fernando Valley.

Thousands of those units were converted to condos, a perfectly legal process that has prompted protests from some longtime apartment dwellers who are being told they must buy their units or find other housing. Gentrification has also led to significantly higher rents in some newly desirable neighborhoods. In downtown, for example, lofts that five years ago went for $800 a month rent at $1,800 or more now…

The City Council is considering rules to slow a recent explosion in apartments being converted into condominiums, particularly in parts of the Westside and San Fernando Valley…..

City Hall is also getting involved in the issue of gentrification, holding hearings throughout Los Angeles to discuss the implications of the rising number of condo conversions. Last month, the council passed a moratorium on the conversion or demolition of low-cost residential hotels in response to concerns that upscale developments downtown were pushing those hotels out.

MY thoughts:

These snippets were from a front page article in LA times of june 15 2006. Looks like LA civic authorities are cracking down on mass apartment conversions into luxury condos. Is this a communistic attact on private property rights or is dwtn LA justified in imposing development curbs in order to protect low-income residents from forced “resettlement”?

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 08:21:35

“Is this a communistic attact on private property rights”

Yes, Especially after the fiasco the last couple of days with the farmland in Downtown Los Angeles.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 06:47:36

Silicon Valley here…Went to San Francisco Last night for dinner and the show Menopause,,,Ist time in the City in 6 years….The Building that has occured on the Embarcadero is just stunning….High rise Condo’s to numerous to count…Dinner for 4 , $300. Don’t know what the tickets cost….

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-06-15 06:49:07

SHORT TERM RATES ARE CLIMBING - ARM RESETS WILL BE MURDER:

LIBOR 1 month 5.25188
LIBOR 2 months 5.33313
LIBOR 3 months 5.39563
LIBOR 6 months 5.51625
LIBOR 12 months 5.6175

Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:13:27

Gooooo baby, go — CDs are next.

 
 
Comment by Brian M. Gwyn
2006-06-15 07:03:15

Somebody mentioned finding out which bank is holding a lot of these doomed mortgages and creating and investment strategy around that (shorting, puts, whatever). Might this article provide a hint? … Homebuilders Rise Aided by Citigroup Note

Comment by motepug
2006-06-15 08:29:35

That was me. Thanks for the link.

Also, check out CORS, a bank that, by purpose and design, issues mortgages to high rise, high end condo builders in the bubbliest markets, SW Florida, Northern VA, etc. That’s what their online stuff says.

The builders pay off the mortgage as they sell units. Talk about hanging your butt out in the wind! What happens when the builders go bust, and stiff lenders like CORS? Ouch.

I looked around some more at boring quarterly and yearly reports, and I’d estimate the big banks have at least 50% of their assets in mortgage back securities, BofA, Citibank, Wells Fargo, etc. It’s one thing when realtors, builders, etc go out of business and scale back. But if the banks get in trouble with their MBS, the whole system might become totally unglued, which would be a disaster. Better hope that doesn’t happen.

Comment by Sarah in DC
2006-06-15 09:41:31

Yikes! Isn’t that Corus bank? That’s where I have my biggest CD… Fortunately it’s coming due in another month. I was going to roll it over, but if this is true I’ll probably take it out.

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-06-15 10:50:34

Unless you have over $100k with them, your money is safe (via FDIC). That’s not to say your money is conveniently available if they do go under! You might encounter some tedium getting it out of a bank-gone-bust, but it’s “safe”.

Or as the English say, “safe as houses”! (Yikes!!!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 11:12:34

The money is safe but the potential interest earned is not.

 
Comment by Sarah in DC
2006-06-15 11:36:19

Yes, I know I’d get the money back eventually… But I was trying to avoid putting money into banks that were very vulnerable to mortgage lending risks. I tried to check that out when I opened the CD, but unfortunately the ’safety ratings’ don’t seem to take that into account.

Thanks for doing the research, motepug!

 
Comment by Kim
2006-06-16 05:46:36

If you want to know the safety rating of a bank, go to Weiss Ratings. You will have to pay $15 for it, but that is why their ratings are so good; no conflict of interest. But I think they have a listing of the strongest banks in the USA that you can look at for free on their website, and it includes banks in most or all of the states.

 
 
Comment by motepug
2006-06-15 11:10:10

Yes, it’s Corus bank.

When bank CD’s I have came due, I just put the money in a money market account, currently paying 4.75%. Then I checked the securities in the money market account, and found at least 50% of Vanguard Prime MM is in mortgage backed securities, one way or the other. This is a $50B money market fund. Eventually, I’ll move the money to the Treasuries only MM account to make sure I don’t get involved with the MBS problems that may come up. May be silly to do this, but the MBS’s are starting to smell like dead fish.

From the Corus website, here’s 10 or 20 of the largest loans for condos they have made. Would be interested to hear what other people on this blog may know about any of these projects. They may be very good projects, or just a hole in the ground, I have no idea.

Terranea Resort
Rancho Palos Verdes CA $150,000,000
The Eclipse on Center Park
Arlington VA $147,500,000
Laketown Wharf
Panama City Beach FL $146,300,000
The Quantum
Miami FL $145,000,000
Evo
Los Angeles CA $141,375,000
One Las Vegas
Las Vegas NV $139,600,000
Palmolive Building
Chicago IL $135,000,000
Continuum at South Beach Phase II
Miami Beach FL $135,000,000
The Ivy at Riverfront
Miami FL $130,400,000
The Pinnacle
Chicago IL $129,300,000
Tao Condominiums
Sunrise FL $126,250,000
The Caribbean
Miami Beach FL $124,700,000
Ariel West
New York NY $122,160,000
Panorama Tower II
Las Vegas NV $120,000,000
The Edge
West Palm Beach FL $117,246,250
Panorama Tower I
Las Vegas NV $116,300,000
The Mark
San Diego CA $112,000,000
15 Broad Street
New York NY $111,292,241
Marina Blue
Miami FL $110,000,000
ICON
San Diego CA $104,000,000
Rockville Town Square
Rockville MD $103,228,000
415 Greenwich Street
New York NY $100,000,000
Safari Drive Condominiums
Scottsdale AZ $97,000,000
The A Condominiums
New York NY $93,000,000
2628 Broadway
New York NY $92,564,000
The Columbian
Chicago IL $92,000,000
Blue
Miami FL $90,000,000
555 Fourth St.
San Francisco CA $87,856,000

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:17:21

There sure is a lot of that money in Miami condos — isn’t Miami the most overbuilt condo arena in the country, by a wide margin?

 
 
 
Comment by Bryce Mason
2006-06-15 09:44:29

I also asked that question two days ago. I found some powerpoint presentations by CFC on the web. Glad to email them to anyone to read. They note the 10 biggest originators and servicers (originations less sold off to FNM). Also I’ll check out your ideas. Setting up an account to buy long, long puts on FNM, CFC, WM, bunch of others. We’ll see what happens. $1000 bucks but I’m in the game if things go bust. brycemason (at) gmail

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:26:43

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Citi’s CEO is part of the Working Group on Financial Assets (aka Plunge Protection Team), which would go very far to explain the occasional rallies of the HB sector on bad news releases (rocketing share price at the opening bell across the entire sector, followed by a flat line for the rest of the day).

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:55:11

KB Homes had a spectacular bad-news rally today, in response to its downgrade…

http://tinyurl.com/pb95f

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 12:22:43

What happened to Dr Horton — gave up 1/2 of its daily gain 1 minute after the close?

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/profile.asp?sid=8930&symb=dhi&siteid=mktw

Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:18:58

You guys are the prose, but I see that the volume after hours was 100, versus 4 million during the day. Seems like a wart.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:19:22

pros

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:03:28

There is a article on stagflation in the LAtimes today…Can someone please post it please….Thanks…

 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-15 07:06:10

Thanks for the info, hoz.

Re: Ashburn. We went to a party there about a month ago and had to stop on the way for a snack! Its *out there*. All those miles and miles and miles of soulless, charm-free developments. Where do all those people work???

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 07:11:14

Looks like the condo market may be bursting in Shanghai.
Property prices still rising
By Li Fei (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-06-15 08:56
…The statistics showed that six cities saw residential housing prices falling in May from the previous month.

Shanghai witnessed the prices of apartments dropping by 6.2 per cent compared with the same period last year.”…

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 07:12:16

Forgot to post link China daily
http://tinyurl.com/m2xmj

 
Comment by sigalarm
2006-06-15 07:34:06

This tidbit from Stratfor http://www.stratfor.com/
———————————————————-
Geopolitical Diary: China’s Economy, Out of Control

China announced Wednesday that industrial production increased in May more rapidly than at any time in the past two years. Output rose 17.9 percent compared to May 2005. The numbers exceeded expectations. Exports in May rose by 25.1 percent while domestic retail sales grew by 14.2 percent. In other words, the Chinese government’s campaign to slow China’s overheating economy is not working. On the contrary, the economy is accelerating.

That is why the People’s Bank of China (PBC), China’s central bank, issued a statement Wednesday saying that banks should be concerned about the potential risks associated with the rapid increase in lending, following a meeting between PBC officials and representatives of China’s banks. China’s M2 — the broad measure of China’s money supply — grew at 19.1 percent year-on-year, outstripping government targets. More important is the fact that Chinese banks, which are provided annual targets for the amount they should make in loans, have already loaned over two-thirds of that amount — with more than half a year to go — and it appears that the rate of lending is accelerating.

Put very simply, the Chinese economy is out of control. One would think that the faster the growth, the better the economy; but at a certain point — and in this case — that is not so, which is why the PBC is trying to get control of the situation. The problem is the massive overhang of debt, and in particular, troubled loans. Looked at from the standpoint of Chinese corporations, servicing this debt is a tremendous burden. Looked at from the standpoint of Chinese banks, the loans threaten the banks’ viability if they become nonperforming.

The solution of Chinese companies is to sell more products to generate cash to pay off the loans. It is difficult to sell into the Chinese economy because of high savings rates, driven by government policies and economic insecurity. The Chinese government needs a high savings rate to help stabilize the banks; dramatically increasing domestic consumption would undermine the savings rate, threatening the banking system just as surely as defaulting loans would. The solution for these companies, therefore, is to increase exports. In a world already saturated with Chinese exports, the only way to increase cash flow is to cut already low prices. That increases cash flow but does nothing for profitability. In other words, companies already saddled by debt burdens cut into (or below) profit margins to service the debt.

(more on the Stratfor site)
——————————————————
Learned mentors, is this a sure sign of the credit bubble really starting to unwind from the supply side?

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 08:44:30

I think so,
…”"WALKING AWAY.” Still, if we learned anything in the boom and bust of the past decade, it’s that the bottom can be further down than anyone expects. That has housing watchers nervous. A new study from econonomic consulting firm Global Insight and financial company National City estimates that 71 metro regions in the U.S. are “extremely overvalued.” High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y., is predicting a recession starting in the first quarter of 2007, largely because of a slump in housing sales. “We see people just walking away from the market,” says Carl B. Weisberg, chief economist at HFE. “This is enough to drag our economy down to a full halt by the end of the year.”
from

JUNE 15, 2006

STORY TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version
E-Mail This Story

PEOPLE SEARCH
Search for business contacts:
First Name :
Last Name :
Company Name :

PREMIUM SEARCH
Search by job title, geography and build a list of executive contacts
Search by Zoominfo
NEWS ANALYSIS
By Michael Mandel

Bubble, Bubble, Who’s in Trouble?
Worried investors are hunting for safe havens. But with so many bubbles about, it’s anyone’s guess which way to turn
http://tinyurl.com/lrua9

 
Comment by sigalarm
2006-06-15 08:55:25

second half of Stratfor article
————————————————
The banks, meantime, do not want to write off nonperforming loans. The trick is to keep them performing — at least to some extent — since the definition of a “troubled” loan is both more elastic and less devastating to a bank’s balance sheet. To do this, the banks arrange to lend more money to troubled enterprises. This allows some repayment of old debts, but simply puts off the day of reckoning on all sides (and increases the magnitude of reckoning when it arrives). Thus, bank lending accelerates at a breakneck pace — not going into market-driven opportunities, but maintaining essentially failed enterprises for a while longer. Production surges at lower prices and the entire process moves faster and faster.

The problem is that any slowdown in economic growth decreases cash flow from imports, cuts into debt payments, and increases nonperforming loans until the entire edifice starts to collapse on itself. This is what happened to Japan in slow motion in the 1990s, and to Southeast Asia with dizzying speed in 1997.

The Chinese government knows it needs to slow down growth to avoid hitting a brick wall. It also knows that slowing down the economy can threaten the entire banking system. It is therefore engaged in setting restrained economic targets and expansionary economic policies simultaneously. It is caught between a rock and a hard place. At a certain point, Chinese companies will no longer be able to grow their exports rapidly. In the case of China, it is the speed bump that is the brick wall. Slowing down is dangerous and speeding up disastrous.

At this moment, therefore, the Chinese economy, incredibly, is speeding up. Virtually every economic indicator we see — with allowances given for uncertainties in Chinese statistical methodology, to put it politely — is surging out of control. It has been clear to the Chinese government for a while that this is coming, and it is now clear to the Western media that China is in trouble. Business Week, which has normally written breathlessly enthusiastic articles on the Chinese miracle, ran one this week entitled “China: Big Economy, Bigger Peril?”

Indeed.
————————————————

Probably good reason to keep an eye on what economy in China is doing. It seems like the house of cards there between keeping exports cheap and buying US debt to help fuel the expansion is showing signs of coming apart. Do we think that in its present state the global markets / economy could clean up a China mess similar to the 1997 Asian currency melt down?

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 09:46:26

China is 10 times the population of Japan and has 20X the land and resources. Good luck

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:22:13

The Chinese and US residential property markets are doomed to drag each other to the bottom of the sea with the breakdown of the symbiosis which will accompany the death of the conundrum.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 07:12:12

Also, for any of you in the Sacramento region….Yesterday, the building that Intel occupies, went on the market For Sale….Outsourcing comming ????

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-06-15 07:13:11

Details!!

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 08:01:36

9835 Goethe Road, Sac…If you want more crispy, lets go off the blog….Post your email Address…

 
 
Comment by DAVID
2006-06-15 08:02:34

Is that a building in Folsom???????? Folsom is outside of Sacramento. It is where the Intel campus is located.

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 08:08:24

Ditto for you David…Post your email…..

Comment by Bryce Mason
2006-06-15 09:49:05

I’m interested. brycemason (at) gmail

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jmunnie
2006-06-15 07:19:19

One More Hole in the Housing Bubble: Insurance

(this link is to the main page, no direct link to entry)

“Even if some coverage remains available from smaller players, at a minimum the premiums would rise substantially as would the possibility of default in a Katrina style disaster, and there is the potential at worst for no coverage to be available. Catastrophic insurance at a reasonable cost has historically reduced the risk premium for owning real estate on both coasts, which happens to be where the housing bubble is most prominent. Should homeowners in these regions be no longer able to obtain coverage, the implications are significant in terms of the re-pricing of house values that would be needed to accommodate the new risk premium. This would be the case even if there was no bubble in these regions!

“Once potential buyers realize they can’t get coverage on massively over valued properties, the potential for a demand side shock could be significant to say the least. It also would change seller’s psychology to discount in order to get out of these properties, something they historically are slow to do, perhaps accelerating the process of price declines beyond that which typically occurs. “

 
Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 07:20:43

scdave….US ‘Stagflation’ Worries Mount

Inflation data and a possible Fed rate hike stir fears of prices rising amid a languishing economy. >>

http://tinyurl.com/h75hj

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 08:29:55

Thanks….

 
 
Comment by JungleJim
2006-06-15 07:23:12

Just announced on CNBC:Home Builders stock way up.. Is this the dead cat bounce?

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-15 07:51:35

IMO, yes. They **are** undervalued compared to recent history, but my guess would be that their earnings quickly deteriorate to pre-2002 levels by the end of the year. They truly have come down a lot already, so wondering how quickly/how much they will move down from here. Expect a rather dramatic fall in Oct, IMO.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:57:10

Don’t forget that their fundamentals (not the ones we have discussed here for the past year or so, but the ones reported to the sheeple in the mainstream press) have severely eroded over the past year to the point where the foundation which supports those stock prices is consumed by dry rot.

 
 
Comment by HHH
2006-06-15 14:24:10

That, combined with a short squeeze.

 
 
Comment by peeper
2006-06-15 07:30:57

Letter to the Editor in a local “free and independent” newspaper in Montana: Housing Prices Slowing

Comment by rms
2006-06-15 18:24:46

That letter’s author reads the tea leaves correctly. Being upside down is one thing, but being upside down in Montana is totally different. While their scenery is beautiful the economy is firmly bricks and mortar with a largely uneducated workforce, and the winters are long and cold. The wait to being right side up could be very long indeed.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 07:48:43

Is anyone else amazed at how slowly this whole housing bubble correction is grinding out? My impression to date is that most of what has been discussed on this blog has actually come to pass with a six month lag, but I am frankly surprised that there is not some kind of capitulation, given the reversal in the position of the main-stream press in recent months.

Or perhaps the capitulation is already underway (e.g., submerging markets and gold crashing back to earth, inventory correction, San Diego prices “tumbling” or “sliding”, depending on which version of the story you read).

Whatch y’all think?

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-15 08:00:17

GS,

They warned us that prices would be sticky on the way down, and they were right. Let’s face it. If you thought (counted on, actually) having $500,000 in your pocket, how quickly would you be willing to let it go to $300K? Yes, one would think, “easy come, easy go,” but these people are desperate. As you know, many have debt based on the highest former sales price in the ‘hood.

Until the crazy loans are gone, this will not end quickly, IMO…perhaps it will literally “plateau” for a long, long time. We need lots of foreclosures to put the fear of God into these final lenders (some risk premium, PLEASE!!!).

Remember, contrary to what many think about the internet driving prices lower more quickly. I think it makes prices even stickier. Sellers do much more research than buyers WRT pricing history, from what I’ve seen. They know what the top price was, and are hell-bent to get it. Used to be Realtors helped set the price according to what the market was doing. Now, the sellers “know better” and will cause the market to stall. That is why we are seeing record inventory so early in the game, IMO.

Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 08:12:11

I agree, many sellers are still in denial thus the “stickiness”. Once a desparate seller’s home is on the market for six months then their prices will come down to earth. Also, with interest rates rising so quickly even the funny money loans are getting pricey. People can afford only so much, especially with the CPI spiraling out of control.

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 09:25:03

Actually, I believe that “prices” (market values) have fallen farther than data indicate. The problem is that it is impossible to observe the price of a home which sits on the market for months and months without a sale — all you know for sure is that the market value is considerably below what the seller is listing, or else it would have sold by now. But those who have not studied econometrics are prone to confuse sales statistics with market values. Due to the censoring problem of homes which don’t sell because their owners are not willing to drop their reservation prices to market value, there is a dearth of available data in the initial stages of a downturn with which to measure actual market values.

What I was referring to was the slow pace at which sellers are coming around to recognize the futility of keeping their homes on the market forever at a price at which they will not sell. But I guess this is the typical stickiness that always accompanies the initial denial phase of a housing market slowdown.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 08:09:00

GS - I am of the opinion that pain will not hit until 2008, I am looking for a decline to last 10 -15 years. I wish the NAR was correct in that this will be a soft landing; because I believe the economic missteps since 1994 will result in a world wide recession that will make the great depression look like a cake walk. I wish there was a way to avoid the carnage that is going to occur. IMHO this is a Perfect Financial Storm. My family, friends and coworkers will not be immune- would that it was otherwise.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 10:27:51

I am similarly pessimistic, although I allow that BB may prove to be a more adept bubbleblower than we all suspect…

 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-06-15 09:12:27

Like watching paint dry. I don’t know how long time blog participants have maintained their sanity.

I have not seen any significant price declines on the properties that I am interested. Although one good property that I thought was sold came back on the market today with the following comment by the re agent:

“ALERT!!!! SALE JUST FELL THROUGH BECAUSE MTG. BROKER WOULDN’T FINANCE DUE TO MISSING KITCHEN. (WATER PIPE BURST–SELLER WILL RESTORE KITCHEN, BUT A SMART BUYER COULD BUY QUICKLY AS IS–REDO THE KITCHEN HIMSELF DOR A PRICE REDUCTION)”

We are and will see price declines on marginal properties and the weakest of the weak are going into foreclosure but IMO a serious correction will only occur when a critical mass of ARMs reset. There are about 2 trillion in ARMs resetting in 2007 which will trigger the panic button. Until then we will be bitching and moaning with the occasional tactical or moral victory.

I do not believe that housing prices will do a 50% free fall in two-three days like the HB’s. The RE market is too illiquid and disfragmented with too many individual players. You got to get all the lemmings headed to the cliff at the same time to get a good crash.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 09:27:21

“The RE market is too illiquid and disfragmented with too many individual players.”

More importantly, Joe and Jose Sixpack do not have the financial savvy to realize they are listing their homes at prices where they will never sell.

Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-06-15 09:49:39

That too!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by robin
2006-06-15 20:59:15

Termite assessment shows most walls and floors have significant damage. New ceiling fans in all rooms! Make offer!

 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-15 16:46:33

Sounds like the lull before the storm. Measuring the general economic picture in Scal in early summer things look rather slow. The recently opened Home depot mega store in Long beach had very light traffic. I Do a lot of traveling around LA metro area and even road traffic seems lighter than usual(high gas prices?).

Go all around to different neighborhoods and all i see are for sale signs everywhere. In rich areas. poor areas.

For Sale House across from my home has languished several monthes without a looker.

There seems to be a standfoff in Scal with sellers unwilling to budge on prices, or playing a Waiting game.

 
Comment by Anon in DC
2006-06-15 18:53:04

Actually I am amazed at how quickly asking prices in DC are dropping. The run-up in prices was what 5 years? If Aug 2005 was the height just wait until August 2007. If the correction takes only 5 years (same as the run-up) I think that would be fast in historical terms.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:25:10

I think the deer are still standing frozen in the middle of the highway. The car had time to stop before hitting the deer. They wait.

(flip, flip, flip to end of chapter — deer dies.)

 
 
Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 07:58:20

Countrywide CEO Defends Pay Package

http://tinyurl.com/fxq4k

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 08:40:42

Don’t the unions have anything better to do. If you don’t like his comp package sell the stock.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 08:02:42

Is this a good time to load up on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS, or to dump them? A post above suggests that central banks “planning to diversify into MBS through 2007″ — a bullish signal. But this artical on Marketwatch.com repudiates the implicit Treasury guarantee on their debt:

http://tinyurl.com/zfhsj

What gives???

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-15 08:05:02

KB Homes and other builders are rallying strongly on the news of a Morgan Stanley downgrade. Don’t downgrades normally lead to lower stock prices? As my grandmother would have said, “The world is going crazy…”.

http://tinyurl.com/g27y7

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-15 08:44:56

Homebuilders/Construction
The Real Story: Look Who’s Buying Homebuilders
By Marc Lichtenfeld
Senior Columnist

6/15/2006 10:30 AM EDT
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/p/stocks/homebuilders/10291769.html

It’s scary to step in front of the speeding train that is the housing market decline.

Investors in homebuilder stocks have had their heads handed to them as the Philadelphia housing sector index is off 20% this year. Bubble-bursting data such as inventory gluts, fewer mortgages and slower home sales make investing in the group a treacherous task.

Yet that’s exactly what several shrewd investors have been doing lately.

Take Emaar Properties, a real estate company based in Dubai. On June 1, Emaar said it would acquire privately held John Laing Homes for $1.05 billion in cash. John Laing has significant exposure to the California market — which is believed by many to be frothy. An Emaar spokesman said the company was interested in the deal for its long-term value and wasn’t worried too much about different cycles in the business.

John Laing recorded $1.6 billion in revenue in 2005, giving the deal a price-to-sales valuation of 0.65. Margaret Whelan of UBS estimates that the P/E on the deal was 6.4. As you can see from the table below, public homebuilders are trading at significant discounts to the Emaar transaction.

In particular, stocks such as Beazer Homes (BZH:NYSE) , Hovnanian Enterprises (HOV:NYSE) and KB Home (KBH:NYSE) , all of which have taken a tumble through the first half of the year, look inexpensive when compared with the Laing transaction.

There’s also the case of General William Lyon, the chairman and CEO of William Lyon Homes (WLS:NYSE) .

In March, Lyon made a tender offer for all the remaining shares (roughly 26%) that he or his trusts do not own. With the stock at $72 at the time, Lyon offered $93. He later raised the offer to $100 and finally to $109. Now the stock is north of $140, as its largest holder, Polygon Investment Partners, which has a 9.9% stake in the company, is clamoring that $109 isn’t enough. Investors (or speculators) appear to be banking on General Lyon upping the ante, despite stating that $109 is his best offer.

Value Plays?

Symbol Price/Earnings Price/Sales
BZH 4.4 0.3
CTX 4.8 0.4
DHI 4.7 0.5
HOV 4.1 0.2
KBH 4.2 0.4
LEN 5 0.4
MDC 4.5 0.5
MTH 4.4 0.5
PHM 4.6 0.5
SPF 3.8 0.4
TOA 3.4 0.3
TOL 5 0.6
WLS 6.5 0.7
Average 4.6 0.4
Emaar/Laing 6.4 * 0.6
Source: Thomson.
Valuations are based on trailing 12 months.
* The P/E ratio for Emaar/John Laing is an estimate based on 2005 results

The general, who is 82 years old, is already worth about $900 million based only on his Lyon Homes holdings. He obviously believes there is an opportunity to increase his wealth by paying a 51% premium to where the stock was when the first tender offer was announced.

But don’t dismiss Lyon’s offer as a speculative bid. Last September, he sold 117,000 shares in a forward contract. In essence, with the stock at its all-time high, General Lyon locked in his profit. After the shares had been cut in half, he attempted to buy the rest of the company. Think he knows value?

Other insiders, while not necessarily gaming the system like Lyon, are hanging on to their shares. For example, at D.R. Horton (DHI:NYSE) , only one insider has sold stock in the past six months — a sale of fewer than 16,000 shares by a director. At beleaguered Technical Olympic USA (TOA:NYSE) , no insiders have sold since the beginning of the year, and 33,000 shares have been bought. Other homebuilders have seen insiders holding steadfast with no massive dumping of shares.

But it’s not just insiders. Some money managers also are enamored of the current valuation of homebuilders. Tontine Management is one of them. The Greenwich, Conn.-based hedge fund company run by Jeffrey Gendell saw its Tontine Partners fund soar 197% in 2003 and 101% in 2004, according to Institutional Investor. Thomson reports that nearly 28% of its assets are invested in homebuilders.

The company’s top 10 holdings include Centex (CTX:NYSE) , KB Home, Pulte Homes (PHM:NYSE) , Ryland Group , Beazer Homes, Toll Brothers (TOL:NYSE) and Hovnanian Enterprises. Last month, Nicholas Yulico reported that Gendell is an activist investor who persuaded Beazer’s management to increase its share-repurchase program.

Homebuilders “have an amazing ability to make money in difficult periods,” says one anonymous hedge fund manager who runs about $60 million. “I’ve never seen a group of stocks do poorly when they’re trading at five or six times earnings while management is buying back stock,” he added. The manager owns and cites Standard Pacific (SPF:NYSE) , NVR (NVR:NYSE) and KB Home as his favorites.

Wellington Management, a Boston-based investment company that manages $322 billion in assets, owns more than 5.6 million shares, or 8.5%, of Standard Pacific; 21 million shares, or 7%, of D.R. Horton; and 2 million shares, or 2%, of Lennar (LEN:NYSE) . In the first quarter of the year, Wellington put more money into the sector, adding to its holdings in those stocks by 12%, 27% and 29%, respectively.

I don’t blame investors who don’t want any part of homebuilder stocks, especially with the avalanche of bad news in the housing market lately. However, it’s important to discern between bad news and bad stocks. At less than five times earnings and 0.4 times sales, I believe investors who can handle some volatility and risk will be rewarded greatly. But don’t just take my word for it — listen to the Gendells and Lyons of the world.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 09:19:31

“John Laing recorded $1.6 billion in revenue in 2005, giving the deal a price-to-sales valuation of 0.65. Margaret Whelan of UBS estimates that the P/E on the deal was 6.4. As you can see from the table below, public homebuilders are trading at significant discounts to the Emaar transaction.”

Savvy US players have traditionally relied on foreign bagholders to purchase overvalued assets during the initial phase of a bear market. Unfortunately, the P/E ratio is not a reliable measure of value, as it suffers from what economists refer to as the “identification problem” — it is impossible to separate the null hypothesis that a P/E ratio is low because the stock is “undervalued” from the first alternative hypothesis that the stock is fairly valued, reflecting a poor outlook, or the second alternative hypothesis that the price has adjusted downwards in advance of an anticipated future drop in earnings. I will go with the second alternative hypothesis myself, because the reality of deteriorating fundamentals is going to catch up with the HB’s permabull rhetoric, and drive down the E in those P/E ratios.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-15 10:27:52

John Laing’s CEO was interviewed by Lansner on his blog at OCR.

If you read between the lines that is his strategy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 08:05:30

Here’s that SD story from the Times.

Key Home Market Losing Steam

The median price in San Diego County in May is essentially flat from a year ago, data show.

http://tinyurl.com/nacz2

 
Comment by AZ_BubblePopper
2006-06-15 08:09:03

What happened to the much awaited spring bounce? Looking at the numbers and they are showing significant M/M volume declines, I think it’s safe to conclude this market is in no position to show anything but negative momentum building. That’s why DL the BS artist is capitulating now. The summer inventories combined with diminished demand much higher rates and a likely tightening of lending standards are a recipe for substantial price declines in the second half.

Widespread defaults aren’t far behind now. Look out below.

 
Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 08:18:14

More condo towers for the OC…anyone want to live in Santa Ana?

http://tinyurl.com/zqxto

Comment by The Hopper
2006-06-15 09:53:05

Hell no.

I don’t understand the condo tower. I lived in New York City, I loved it. But I was also allowed to put a BBQ on my patio and have a pet.

Why would anyone want to live (full time) in a hotel room?

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:05:23

Granite counter tops?

Comment by SLO Bear
2006-06-15 12:05:13

Hand-textured drywall and and “restaurant-grade” appliances get me aroused.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-15 17:02:52

Santa ana is the most densely populated city in OC. South of Segerstrom ave it is still a pretty solid middle class well kept suburb. North of segerstrom all way to the 5 frwy it is well on way to becoming a rundown deteriorating immigrant subburban slum. Here you can actually witness the deterioration of a once solid middle class clean OC suburb into a ragged immigrant-swamped latinoized barrio.

The location for those aforementioned condo towers is actually in the far southeast corner of Santa Ana close to Costa mesa and irvine. This area falls in the south-of -segerstrom area which is an area of apartments, condos, and office parks, not “tijuanized” as of yet but a stones throw from the Tijuana section of SA.

 
 
Comment by Mort
2006-06-15 08:52:37

http://tinyurl.com/frr8k

Owner May consider taking a trade for partial payment (Acreage, Real Estate hawaii Big island land or may even consider your ferrari) downpayment.

Cool! I haven’t been using my property in Hawaii or my ferrari that much lately anyway.

 
Comment by Baldy
2006-06-15 08:56:42

Not worth a thread, but there is a development of 12 townhomes in my neighborhood (approx $985k - $1.15M). They were built in 2004. 5 have sold. The most expensive one has just been reduced $50,000 (4.166%). From $1.20 Million down to the rock bottom price of $1.15 Million. Not much of a sale, IMO.

Comment by scdave
2006-06-15 10:28:36

WHERE ??

 
 
Comment by ChillintheOC
2006-06-15 08:59:33

Getstucco said….Is anyone else amazed at how slowly this whole housing bubble correction is grinding out?
————————————————————————–
Actually, I’m of the oposite opinion. I’m amazed at how fast things are changing. Remember it wasn’t that long ago (6 months?) that the NAR and CAR were disputing the existance of a housing bubble. Now we’re seeing talk of % declines, “soft landings” (RE never declines talk just a few months ago), and finger pointing at the flippers (who the NAR claimed 1 short year ago were not a significant part of the market).

I’m still holding to my original prediction that the Sh$t will hit the fan in fall 06 (once the summer bounce is history and the impending 07 ARM resets begin to loom on the horizon).

Comment by hoz
2006-06-15 09:28:38

Good comment CITOC, This is going faster than I thought and accelerating.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-06-15 12:31:29

Agreed. I’m surprised at the speed. We are now where I thought we would be in December.

I still think this will take years to play out fully. We have 2, 3, 5, 7 and even 10 year I/O loans to come to fruition and I believe even the 10 I/O loans may find themselves underwater at the end of that period. Of course they’ll have paid taxes/maintenance during the time anyways, even if they show a 2% gain.

I think we have already had sharp drops. Then we’ll see the dead cat bounce. Then more drops. Then another bounce. Then another drop and then a long long long slow suffering silence.

Comment by robin
2006-06-15 21:11:49

Amazed at the acceleration in some areas and the inertia still left in others. National bubble, probably. Two years to include all markets, certainly!

 
 
 
Comment by zipost
2006-06-15 09:18:47

Saw a sign at a busy corner of Grand and Diamond Bar Blvd. in socal last weekend and I got a good laugh btw as I pointed it out to my wife. Sign reads something like “looking for real estate apprentice, $20k/mo.

Comment by The Hopper
2006-06-15 15:55:18

These are everywhere down in the OC. It started a few months ago with a handwritten yellow sign by the Borders Best Buy in Mission Viejo. Now I’m seeing fancier versions all with the same empty promise.

My bet: a multi level marketing scheme

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 09:31:00

The stock market is on its second day of a giant dead cat bounce. How far will the crash in long-term Treasuries go before the stock market selloff resumes?

http://tinyurl.com/qhhen

Comment by AZgolfer
2006-06-15 11:51:31

Stucco

I am trying to put together an exiting plan for my 401K and my financial advisor just looks at me and says I have 10 years before I need to access the money and I should just leave it in the stock market. Does anyone know when would be a good time to GET OUT? Where do you put the money while you wait for the market to bottom out?

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-15 11:57:16

There are many possible ways to gamble, but if you want to play it safe and are willing to live with a low risk premium, I would suggest Swiss francs (and will leave it to other posters to recommend the best way to buy and hold them)…

 
Comment by OutofSanDiego
2006-06-16 05:59:40

I am trying to do the same thing, though it is impossible to time the market. As long as you don’t second guess yourself and flog yourself if the DOW ends the year at 11,500 or something. Low risk would be to simply ladder some CD’s. I’ve seen 3 month CD’s over 5% and recently put some money into a 13 month at 5.35%. I think rates will increase again next month after the FED meets at the end of June. I would like to keep riding CD as interest rates increase. I’ve told myself if rates on a five year get back to 7% or higher (they were there as recently as 2001) then I’m going all in and take the low risk to protect my money.

 
Comment by Kim
2006-06-16 06:04:14

Get out now, if not sooner. If you leave it in the stock market you will probably lose well over half of it. You can put it in Tbills, or maybe partly in a bear market fund such as Bearx or Grzzx. If you had money in the stock market in 1968, or maybe it was 1966, it would have taken 16 years to break even, so forget the “you have 10 years” argument. I am buying QQQQ puts in my Roth IRA, but it is a tiny amount of our total net worth, sort of my playing money. However, you may want to put a small percentage of your 401K into puts as insurance. Buy them 2-3 months out and sell them before they expire.

 
 
 
Comment by Geoff
2006-06-15 09:48:04

Per ziprealty, Mission Viejo inventory at 1000 today.
There was an article in the OC Register earlier this year saying something like “well sales are slowing, and inventory is rising but inventory is not up as high as it was in August 2004 (800), when we got that false alarm about the end of the bubble.”

 
Comment by ockurt
2006-06-15 10:10:33

Check out this tool…

Montclair ‘Miner’ in Deep Trouble
Homeowner, certain he’d find gold in his yard, has nothing to show for his effort but a 60-foot hole and the ire of authorities

http://tinyurl.com/s9lmh

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 11:44:46

Yea, he probably get his investment advice from a purple fella named Barney.

 
Comment by LA notary
2006-06-15 13:05:21

I saw that on the news last night LOL He says he’s going to Peru with he metal detector after he gets his hole filled.

 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-15 17:20:07

If its Monclair digging a 60-ft deep unauthorized hole in ones yard no big deal. Monclair is one of the smelly armpit
communities in The tricounty region. Lots of Gangs, graffiti and assorted low life. As Monclair is close to the Inland empire, if not part of it, why is it a big deal about the 60 foot hole. The Entire IE is being dug up and bulldozed for housing and urban development. There are big, gaping fenced-off holes for foundations all over the IE.

 
 
Comment by Brandon
2006-06-15 11:22:52

In big cities you may get a free BMW or Mercedes if you buy an overpriced home. In Boise, you can get a free…..Pontiac!

http://boise.craigslist.org/rfs/171856321.html

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-15 11:51:21

LMAO a used car no longer in the blue book at that. Sign me up Boise here I come.

 
 
Comment by bacon
2006-06-15 12:59:11

WOW!! this douchbag wants $5k/month for rent for a 4/3 SFH!?

and he only paid 331k back in ‘92 for the place… someone must be HELOC’d out of their skull or losing bigtime on flipper properties!! AHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/apa/171885658.html

http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/RealEstate/reassessments/scripts/Inquiry.asp?action=view&lrsn=33393

Comment by MC_White
2006-06-16 12:35:30

From the CL listing: “Owner will credit back to Tenants up to $500/month towards their utility payments, or $6,000/annum, at the end of each lease term date provided there has been no breach in the lease’s terms and the utility bills paid for the year either meet or exceed $6,000.”

OK, let me see if I have this straight. The owner will credit you the equivalent of $6,000 if and only if your cumulative yearly utility payments exceed $6,000?

So what are you supposed to do if you rent this house, and in month 11 you’ve only racked up $4,000 in utility bills?

“Turn on all the stove burners and open the windows, Honey! We’re gonna run the pool pump 24-7, set the thermostat at 20F, throw extension cords over the back fence for the neighbors to use! We gotta burn through $1,000 in 30 days!”

This guy must be on crack.

 
 
Comment by Kathy
2006-06-15 13:00:28

A local paper here has finally acknowledged the bubble in the western suburbs of Chicago. Like I’ve said before, the real driver here was tear downs - tearing down $350,000 ranches and putting up $1.2mm mcmansions.
There is no link, but here are a few choice quotes:
Teardown slowdown
“McMansion” glut cuts appetite for lots
Ruth Solomon
Staff Writer
The Doings Newspapers
“For some owners of modest ranch homes built 50 years ago, the last few years have been a bonanza. But the party may be over, or at least winding down.”
“Historically low interest rates, adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only loans put higher-priced homes within the reach of buyers who might not have qualified for such big mortgages in years past.”
Realtor: “What we are seeing is going back to normalcy. We can’t have a hot market forever and ever.”
Financial advisor: “People who want to sell their homes are getting frustrated. They want to sell for the same prices they could have gotten nine months ago.”
Realtor: “. . . it is not a question of too few buyers.” “The problem is too many homes.” Explain that one again?

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-06-15 16:50:57

Could this be an unemployed realtor?

http://dallas.craigslist.org/med/172025468.html

Comment by Chip
2006-06-15 19:32:19

Could be. “For females only.” Looks like innovative trolling.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

  • The Housing Bubble Blog