December 13, 2014

Bits Bucket for December 13, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

232 Comments »

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 01:28:26

Has oil bottomed out yet?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 01:30:21

Oil and Gas
Oil will ‘absolutely’ continue to fall: Dennis Gartman
Michelle Fox
9 Hours Ago
CNBC.com

Oil hit fresh lows and noted investor Dennis Gartman thinks the rout isn’t done yet. In fact, he thinks it has a lot further to fall, he told CNBC on Friday.

Crude oil has this terrible, hysterical tendency of falling 75, 80 and 90 percent in value. Can it go down farther from here? Absolutely,” Gartman, editor and publisher of The Gartman Letter, said in an interview with “Closing Bell.”

He pointed to action in the futures market as a telling sign, specifically the term structures for crude futures.

Until the front months stop leading the way down, crude still wants to go lower,” he explained.

Comment by butters
2014-12-13 06:59:19

Gartman? LOL

When I had cable I used to listen to this guy on CNBS. He is bullish a week and bearish the next. It used to make me mad…come on, you can’t flip flop like that in a matter of week, right? There’s got be some laws around that.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 07:21:25

Yes, most people on those shows are like that, they just follow the trend. It does not matter what it does the next few weeks, there is not enough oil that can be produced at these levels or even close to these levels. The futures market comes unhinged from fundamentals from time to time but it does not last long. The drilling data is already showing that both in Canada and the U.S. oil companies are cutting back on drilling. Since there is no real oil glut or a paper futures glut, it means by the time Hillary runs we will have high gasoline prices. Not go for the Democrats that we are losing capacity now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 07:31:21

go= good. BTW, a physical market where the actual consumption of oil is about 1% lower than the actual production is not in glut no matter how the MSM tries to spin it. With rising consumption as we have, you want build up storage just to maintain the same amount of days of consumption in storage. Nothing but economic warfare using the futures market, but Russia and Iran will deal with it and it will not be a strong warning.

 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 07:33:19

gartman is full of sh@T and you all know he is a paid propoganda mouthpiece like cramer.These folks will bankrupt you to fill their own pockets.

 
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 07:39:34

I am little more cynical than you and I am convinced that there’s a massive manipulation of oil by the oil companies, banks, governments, etc. Just like they have manipulated PMs, housing, stock markets. They will never let the market to the price discovery of anything….they have fixed prices for everything.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 07:44:35

And guess what happens to prices when you stay out?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 07:45:29

Consumption is falling. The world has overcapacity in everything. Steel and coal were the front runners, now oil. The price of everything used to build stuff was tremendously bloated for the past few years. The boom was unsustainable.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 07:47:50

There has indeed been manipulation. It all goes back to cheap and easy credit. When money can be had for nothing, everything gets manipulated.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 07:48:24

There are no free markets and everything is manipulated. However, I believe that assets that governments favor like housing and stocks are manipulated up and assets such as gold and now oil are manipulated down to benefit the fiat money system.

 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-13 07:51:29

In this case, I agree with a-dan that $75-80(?)/barrel is likely a fair and sustainable price. Oil reminds me of what the Chinese are doing to solar panels — producing them at below cost and eating the losses just to drive the American manufacturers out of business. When in reality, solar panels are just expensive to make, and no amount of optimization or buying in bulk or competition will bring the price down to low levels.

Similarly the cheap oil was burned long ago, and someone is eating a loss with every barrel sold. The price drop is a lot sharper than solar panels because oil is shaking out extra manipulation that comes from being a strategic commodity, and I guess the Chinese finished building ghost cities. (And while I understand the resistance to drone war, I think it uses a lot less oil than a ground war.)

 
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 07:51:43

Bingo! Cheap and easy money is root of the evil. Too bad, that’s all they have left and they will use it again and again until the collapse.

 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 08:10:23

“The danger of stimulus-induced bubbles is starting to play out in the market for energy-company debt. Since early 2010, energy producers have raised $550 billion of new bonds and loans as the Federal Reserve held borrowing costs near zero, according to Deutsche Bank. With oil prices plunging, investors are questioning the ability of some issuers to meet their debt obligations. Research firm CreditSights predicts the default rate for energy junk bonds will double to 8% next year. “Anything that becomes a mania – it ends badly,” said Tim Gramatovich, chief investment officer of Peritus Asset Management. “And this is a mania.”

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:22:56

But the bubble is in drilling not in the actual price in oil. Fracking is very expensive only the availability of relatively cheap money has allowed the wells to be drilled. Raise capital costs and the price of oil will have to be well above $100 to make it possible to drill the wells.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:22:58

“In this case, I agree with a-dan that $75-80(?)/barrel is likely a fair and sustainable price.”

And how did you arrive it this one Donk?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:26:41

Maybe the same way you arrive at the 50 dollars a sq foot number?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:30:24

You’re not in the drilling business or the construction biz my friend.

You’re a bonafide fraud.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:30:47

“In this case, I agree with a-dan that $75-80(?)/barrel is likely a fair and sustainable price.”

Oh good, we have a HBB consensus that oil prices are soon to go right back up again!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:32:50

No, she and I are using a number that matches the facts. But if you can show me numbers how you can build a house in ABQ for that price please post them.

 
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 08:33:32

Oh good, we have a HBB consensus that oil prices are soon to go right back up again!

Why are they so averse to cheap prices? Oil has to go up, housing has to go up. Just because it’s cheap, doesn’t diminish the quality, people! Grrr…..

 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 08:36:42

oil is a screaming buy at these prices. china is buying tankers of fuel left and right.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:36:50

ABQ Dan made the wild claim yesterday that oil field development cost is “different” for every field, thus a development budget can’t be established.

Here’s your challenge ABQDan. go ahead and select one field and show me development costs line for line.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:41:06

We have been waiting years for you to show how you can build a house anywhere for 50 dollars a sq. foot, start with ABQ and then you can show Oxide how you do it in the DC area.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:50:25

We’ve shown it and the end product right here on this blog. You just don’t like what you see. Now onto oil field development and production costs ABQDan.

Go!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 09:46:54

HA, I never claimed to be in the drilling business but I was involved in regulating oil drilling and have seen the reports but the information is proprietary and too extensive to be placed on a blog even for a single field.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-12-13 09:48:34

“Since there is no real oil glut.”

You mean that massive glut of oil is actually fake crude? What are they using, syrup?

Abdan is back, and so are his prolific lies.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-12-13 09:49:40

“HA, I never claimed to be in the drilling business but I was involved in regulating oil drilling and have seen the reports but the information is proprietary and too extensive to be placed on a blog even for a single field.”

You are a lying phony.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 09:55:58

lol… He’s “seen reports”!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 09:59:55

You mean that massive glut of oil is actually fake crude?

No, mean the difference between the amount of oil a actually produced and actually consumed is not enough to be considered a glut. In 1987 the stock market crashed. It had nothing to do with fundamentals just like this crash and oil has very little to do with fundamentals. That is why both Russia and Iran are calling it correctly it is economic warfare waged on the futures market. But that paper oil cannot keep you warm or fuel your vehicle.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 10:17:05

“this crash and oil has very little to do with fundamentals.”

Right. It must be a conspiracy. Iran says so, there you have it.

When a credit mania goes off the tracks, things go splat. That’s the fundamental. Global construction drove the energy mania. Global credit expansion drove the construction mania. The central banks drove the credit mania and introduced instability.

If I were China, I’d be filling the strategic reserve too, even in the face of industrial contraction, because instability is dangerous. My strategic reserve consists of an extra pair of walking shoes and spare bike tires.

Cheerleading the bubble prices in commodities is not just wrong, it is wrong headed.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:17:13

BTW, permits to drill are down 30% already in the fracking areas, seems like my numbers are quite sound.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:21:17

Update: newer numbers permits to drill are not down 30% but 40% in the fracking areas:
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Oil-Prices/Shale-Permits-Fall-As-Low-Oil-Prices-Start-To-Bite.html

With the high decline rates of the well, if this continues, we will not see a million barrel increase in oil production this year, we will be lucky to maintain production.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:33:41
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 10:34:53

Prices are falling.

Now back to your production cost claim. Show us production cost.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:36:06

The new link citing to the correct 40% is coming but here is an excerpt:

Tumbling oil prices spurred a decline in new well permits issued in the U.S. by nearly 40 percent in November, according to new data.

Reuters reports it was provided industry data by the firm Drilling Info Inc, which revealed 4,520 new well permits were approved in November, down from 7,227 in October.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 10:37:24

Oil demand is cratering.

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-12-13 10:54:12

“In this case, I agree with a-dan that $75-80(?)/barrel is likely a fair and sustainable price.”

Based upon what? Did you just pull this number out of your rear?

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-13 10:57:33

But if you can show me numbers how you can build a house in ABQ for that price please post them ??

He can’t so he won’t…He will come back with his same BS that its been shown here many times which makes him a lying fraud just like the realtors he vilifies…

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:59:13

And remember the 40% decline occurred when oil had dropped only into the seventies. The numbers will be much worse for December. Putin must be smiling looking at these numbers. Obama tried to punish Russia and has punished the U.S. instead.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 11:03:09

just a Repeater.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 11:03:16

I know, we all know. Left or right we agree on that.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 12:20:06

Sorry you don’t like that fact Dave. Of all people, being a contractor as you claim, you know exactly what M&L costs are.

Right?

 
Comment by jane
2014-12-13 15:38:31

err…umm…what on earth are M&L costs? In my world that means “Moving and Living. In my alternate world that means “Machinery and Logistics”. What is it in this context?

On the edge of my seat (I love having details nailed down). What’s the real scoop?

 
Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2014-12-13 16:11:38

“…err…umm…what on earth are M&L costs?”

My guess is “materials and labor,” jane. :)

 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:35:00

Get your news on Comedy Central and comedy on the news.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 01:33:32

Home> Money
Oil Plunges Again, Reaches Recession-Level Depths
NEW YORK — Dec 12, 2014, 4:36 PM ET
By JONATHAN FAHEY AP Energy Writer
Associated Press

Another forecast of weak global demand, another nosedive for oil.

A 6-month rout in the price of oil accelerated this week, culminating in a 4 percent drop Friday, its third such drop in 5 days, to its lowest level since May of 2009, when the U.S. was still in recession. Friday’s trigger was a lowered expectation for oil consumption from the International Energy Agency.

The benchmark U.S. oil price closed down $2.14 to close at $57.81 a barrel in New York. It is now 46 percent below its late-June high for the year of $107.26. Brent crude, the international standard used to price oil purchased by many U.S. refineries, fell 77 cents to close at $61.85.

In its monthly oil report, the IEA said global oil demand in 2015 will grow by 900,000 barrels a day, 230,000 less than previously forecast, to 93.3 million barrels a day.

The agency said the reduction was a result of “the ever-more tentative pace of the global economic recovery.”

It was the latest in a string of reports and forecasts that suggest that there is far more oil being produced globally than there is demand for it.

OPEC said Wednesday that higher production from non-OPEC members and weak global economic growth will reduce demand for its oil to 28.9 million barrels a day next year. That’s the lowest level in more than a decade, and less than the 30 million barrels per day that the group says it plans to produce next year.

Also on Wednesday, the Energy Department reported a surprise increase in U.S. crude supplies of 1.5 million barrels. Analysts were expecting a decline of 2.2 million barrels. Gasoline stocks also increased more than expected.

Earlier in the week Japan reported that its economy shrunk more than expected and new factory data from China suggested further slowing there.

On Friday the IEA said several years of high oil prices prompted drillers around the world to develop new oil fields. Now that oil is surpassing demand. For example, U.S production has surged by 3.5 million barrels per day since 2008, more than every OPEC nation except Saudi Arabia.

The agency dampened expectations that the fall in oil prices will automatically be a boon for the global economy.

“The adverse impact of the oil price rout on oil-exporting economies looks likely to offset, if not exceed, the stimulus it could provide for oil-importing countries against a backdrop of weak economic growth and low inflation,” the IEA said.

Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 07:35:46

should I feel guilty about people losing their jobs when I fill up today?

Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 07:49:02

You and every other member of the debt donkey army.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 08:12:51

Are you disgruntled cause uncle FED is handing out free money to people via stocks and homes?

Sometimes you just have to jump on the bandwagon even know you do agree with whats going on.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:28:19

Hate the game, not the player.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 10:20:21

“Are you disgruntled cause uncle FED is handing out free money…”

Could be, but I’ll have no sympathy for the debt minded when the money goes back to where it came from.

 
 
Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 08:05:13

Did yu eel guilty when the mortgage bankers and all the pimps and shills for the REIC lost their fraud profits durin the last downturn?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-13 11:00:58

should I feel guilty about people losing their jobs when I fill up today ??

No, but I am not quite sure its something that we all should be celebrating…Yes, it does put a little more coin in all our pockets but it may be indicating there is some serious economic storm clouds advancing…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 11:05:49

The clouds have been there for years, in plain sight. Now it’s anvils dropping.

 
 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:37:03

“Oil reminds me of what the Chinese are doing to solar panels — producing them at below cost and eating the losses just to drive the American manufacturers out of business.”

The Amazon play book. It killed Sears.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:23:03

Is the massive slowdown in Europe and China likely to bode for higher or for lower oil prices from here on out?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:25:36

AlbqDan’s China GDP growth “forecast” is slip-sliding away…

China’s Slowdown Deepens as Factory Output Growth Wanes: Economy
By Bloomberg News Dec 12, 2014 12:54 AM PT

China’s economy slowed in November as factory shutdowns exacerbated weaker demand, raising pressure on the central bank to add further stimulus.

Bloomberg’s gross domestic product tracker came in at 6.78 percent year-on-year in November, down from 6.91 percent in October and a fourth month below 7 percent, according to a preliminary reading
. Factory production rose 7.2 percent from a year earlier, retail sales gained 11.7 percent, and investment in fixed assets expanded 15.8 percent in January through November from a year earlier, official data showed.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:25:33

No, it is exactly what I said it would be around 7%. Actually, it should be around 7.3% this year and 7% next year. The Chinese will not miss their target two years in a row, it would be a loss of “face”, with the government’s low debt levels only 17% of GDP, they will increase spending if necessary to meet their target. They have a water project which will deliver enough water for 100 million people in the Beijing area.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 10:40:23

Down by 50% and falling since 2008.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:46:24

7% growth today increases demand for raw materials more than 10%, seven years ago since China is a much bigger economy now.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 11:14:05

Demand for raw materials is dropping off a cliff in China. Notice what’s happened to iron ore and coal suppliers this year? China is the most indebted people on earth.

I’d say they have sufficient scapegoats to cover face. 100,000 in jail or executed and counting. Some miracle.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:54:46

It is indeed a miracle to see so many economies fueled by electronically-issued debt and little else.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:35:31

Apparently the slowdown underway is not limited to Europe and China.

Got falling BRICs?

Credit Suisse Says Sell Brazilian Stocks Amid Economic Slowdown
By Christine Jenkins Dec 11, 2014 10:12 AM PT

Investors should sell Brazilian stocks as Latin America’s largest economy struggles to revive growth, according to Credit Suisse Group AG.

The benchmark Ibovespa, which approached a bear market today, isn’t attractive as the economic slowdown and a decline in commodities dim the outlook for corporate earnings, Credit Suisse analysts led by Andrew T. Campbell wrote in a research note to clients. The gauge climbed 0.2 percent to 49,634.71 at 3:59 p.m. in Sao Paulo after earlier extending its plunge from this year’s high in September to about 20 percent.

Brazil’s incoming Finance Minister Joaquim Levy has pledged to implement more rigorous fiscal discipline and narrow the widest budget deficit in a decade as gross domestic product is forecast to expand at the slowest pace since 2009. While concern growth will falter pushed the Ibovespa’s valuation to a one-month low of 10.2 times estimated earnings, that’s in line with the five-year average, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“Even after the recent correction, we downgrade Brazil to underweight due to poor GDP and earnings outlook, fiscal tightening, FX risk, low corporate profitability and insufficiently attractive valuation,” the analysts wrote.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:42:47

Now, on Brazil I agree and have said it for years when Rio was claiming that Brazil knew how to run an economy. Both Brazil and the US try to push demand side economics which does work. China with supply side economics will succeed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2014-12-13 11:04:21

Talking about Rio, where the hell has he been…I don’t think Ben banned him…

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 12:30:29

demand side does not work, at least in the medium and long term. Since Brazil’s economy went south, as I predicted, he disappeared, I am certain he is posting under another name.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:40:34

Retail inflation falls, but so does factory output
IIP shrinks 4.2% in Oct, retail inflation eases to 4.38% in Nov, strengthening the case for a rate cut by RBI
Asit Ranjan Mishra
Food inflation eased to 3.14% from 5.59% a month ago due to softening of vegetable prices. The retail inflation data strengthens the case for a rate cut by the central bank to spur investment and economic growth.
Photo: Indranil Bhoumik/Mint

New Delhi: India’s factory output contracted unexpectedly in October, the first time in seven months and its worst performance in three years, while retail inflation touched a new low since the series was launched in 2012, strengthening the case for a rate cut by the central bank to spur investment and economic growth. The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) shrank 4.2% in October, data released by the statistics department showed on Friday, dragged down by manufacturing, which contracted by 7.6%. Mining and electricity sectors grew by 5.2% and 13.3%, respectively, during the month.

Such a poor performance was last seen in October 2011, when factory output had contracted by 5%. Industrial production was upwardly revised to 2.8% year-on-year in September from 2.5% earlier. However, retail inflation measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) eased to 4.38% in November, compared with 5.52% a month ago, as vegetable prices fell by 6.97%. While fuel and light inflation stood at 3.27%, clothing, bedding and footwear inflation rose by 6.97%. The National Democratic Alliance government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi assumed charge in May with a pledge to revive economic growth, which slumped to sub-5% levels for two consecutive years.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:44:12

26 November 2014 Last updated at 21:28 ET

Whatever happened to the Brics economies?
By Andrew Walker
BBC World Service Economics correspondent
Gazprom Neft oil refinery in Moscow
Oil is key to the Russian economy

Remember the Brics - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, the nations that were set to reshape the world economy?

Two of them, China and Russia have the potential to cause some serious and rather unwelcome reshaping in the near future.

In China’s case it’s the risk that an economic slowdown could turn into something more damaging.

With Russia, it’s the possible economic fallout from the conflict in Ukraine.

Four of these five countries - South Africa is the exception - were identified in 2001 as large and fast-growing economies that would have increasingly influential global roles in the future.

Today it’s China and Russia that are potentially the most troubling for the rest of the world in the near term.

China’s story is one that we would inevitably have had to face sooner or later. Indeed you might say it is remarkable that it hasn’t come sooner.

China has recorded extraordinary rates of economic growth for a very long time - an average of 10% a year for three decades.

But there are weaknesses. It’s based on very high rates of investment, currently running at 48% of national income or GDP.

When it’s so high there’s always a danger that many projects will turn out to be wasteful or unprofitable, undermining the finances of the investors themselves and anybody who has lent them money.

Only a handful of countries have higher rates of investment, none of them with much to teach China. They are Bhutan, Equatorial Guinea, Mongolia and Mozambique.

The other element in China’s rapid growth is exports.

That is not so reliable these days as the rest of the world struggles to recover convincingly from the financial crisis.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:47:03

Anyone who blathers on endlessly about oil production costs setting a floor under prices while ignoring the massive cratering of demand which is currently playing out shouldn’t post about economics on this board.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:48:40

That fact that he cannot identify production costs yet yammers incessantly about them is priceless.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 09:23:40

The possibility that we might be seeing some actual price discovery in a major global market has a number of people, shall we say, “perplexed” at the moment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 09:27:54

Petrified is more accurate.

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 09:40:50

I was going for the poetic understatement.

For example, people who have real bets on oil are “perplexed” about the size of the current laundry bills for their undergarments.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 10:22:01

Them and the horse they rode in on.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 12:45:56

My major position in that area is BHI and that has worked out quite well. I went for the people selling the picks and shovels. Admittedly got lucky with the buy out but my BP as of yesterday was 118/74 not bad for a 55 year old not on any medicine. I guess I am not worried.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:52:34

“Petrified is more accurate.”

I’m guessing a lot of investors are sh!tt!n’ BRICs about now.

 
Comment by rms
2014-12-14 00:08:45

“I’m guessing a lot of investors are sh!tt!n’ BRICs about now.”

+1 Lolz!

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 09:54:39

Cratering of demand? How is almost one million barrels of new demand for 2015 as estimated by IPEA a cratering of demand? We set record demand this year and next year will be a new record some cratering.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 10:23:54

oil is a bargain at these prices dont you think? It wont last forever. Back up the truck. Go long dude.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 10:24:06

China is in contraction. We will all follow.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-13 10:41:41

I’m tired of the over-reliance on simple supply-and-demand to determine prices. Price crashes in response to crating demand would only happen if the product needs to be sold right away — for example it if rots like food or flowers (or housing, slowly), or if the cost of keeping it in a warehouse is more than it’s worth. Oil doesn’t rot, and it has its own special warehouse. So why the immediate need crash prices to sell it just because “oh god supplyyyy and demaaaaand?” Just refuse to sell it and leave it in the ground.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 10:44:13

Crude and refined product prices are falling Donk. Just like housing prices.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-13 11:18:51

‘I’m tired of the over-reliance on simple supply-and-demand to determine prices’

Zillow?

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 11:42:38

“So why the immediate need crash prices to sell it just because “oh god supplyyyy and demaaaaand?”

You’re referring to a world that no longer exists, where not everything was financialized to the hilt and leveraged to the teeth with toxic debt. People and companies hunkered down and rode through the lean years. I’m old enough to remember.

Debt donkeys have nowhere to turn when the cash flow dries up.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 12:35:30

Watching and reading the twisted contortions of DebtDonkeys is fascinating.

Example…. The cost to install roof deck, felt and shingles is $80k minimum(it’s gotta be that much!) but the cost to replace it is somehow less even though the labor is doubled due to stripping it not to mention transportation and disposal cost.

So goes the twisted world of DebtDonkeys.

Hint: Homedebtors are easy targets. That’s why theyre homedebtors.

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 13:15:35

Yeah, we used to refer to them as the “weaker hands”. Now we refer to them as “just about everyone”, alas.

A little bit of unexpected pricing behavior outside a narrow bound, and an entire sector and all the financial hands behind it immediately blow up, and go begging for bailouts. Doesn’t matter what in particular anymore. When will we put a tight clamp on this nonsense?

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 14:41:30

“I’m tired of the over-reliance on simple supply-and-demand to determine prices.”

Economics ain’t chemistry…

 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-13 18:19:17

Evidently not, Whac. But iftheshoefits makes a good point. Companies don’t have to sell oil right now by reason of the oil rotting away, but they DO have to sell oil right now to pay off the minimum payment of whatever credit card they charged the production costs to. Got it.

Now see, those frackers should have bought off a few Congressmen and a Treasury Secretary or two. Then they could have gotten “mark-to-fantasy” accounting on in-the-the ground shadow-inventory of oil, and use the fantasy assessed inventory as collateral to borrow more money to make their payments. Just like the mortgage banks did for zombie housing. :mrgreen:

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-13 18:34:11

‘use the fantasy assessed inventory as collateral to borrow more money to make their payments’

Already happened:

‘What is the collateral for the 5% yields advertised by these fly-by-night funds—–often issued and managed by the same folks who sold housing sector CLOs and CDOs last time around?’

‘Why its the leveraged loans issued by E&P operators in the shale patches. The collateral for these leveraged loans, in turn, is shale rocks 4,000-9,000 feet down under that have been worthless until approximately 2005 and would be worthless today without dramatically over-priced crude oil and drastically underpriced debt capital.’

‘That is to say, the vaunted collateral in the shale patch craps out after about two-years unless new money is poured down the well bore and oil prices are above $75-$80 per barrel on the WTI marker price to cushion the sharp discounts back to the wellhead. But with marker price now plunging into the $50s, the drilling will soon stop, the production will crap-out, the shale rock collateral value will regress toward the zero bound, the E&P borrowers will default, the energy CLO’s will implode and the hapless yield chasers will be left high, dry and panicked.’

http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=8751#comment-2400778

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-13 21:48:05

“the shale patch craps out after about two-years…”

It was a play on a credit ponzi from the get-go. Information on well depletion has been widely available, but the hot money mob wasn’t interested.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:48:37

Business World
Saturday 13 December 2014
Business Newsletter
ECB’s Nowotny says euro zone economy weakening massively
Published 08/12/2014 | 13:25

The euro zone is experiencing a massive weakening in its economy not least due to a slowdown in its biggest member, Germany, a senior ECB policy maker said today.

“We see a massive weakening in the euro zone economy,” Ewald Nowotny, a member of the ECB’s Governing Council, told a conference in Frankfurt.

Nowotny said that the European Central Bank had struck a middle ground in its monetary policy, between extremes in the United States that called for full-blown money printing and others that wanted the ECB to take a less expansive path.

The Austrian central bank chief reiterated a key target spelt out by ECB President Mario Draghi last week.

“The balance sheet of the ECB should reach the levels at the start of 2012, a level which is around 1 trillion euros higher than it is now,” he said.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:57:44

Australia’s painful choices in economic slowdown
Published: Dec 7, 2014 12:48 p.m. ET
By Rachel Pannett

SYDNEY, Australia–Resources firms in Australia spent the past decade plowing billions of dollars into new mines and gas projects that promised to make budget deficits a thing of the past.

It hasn’t worked out that way.

Sharp falls in prices of commodities from iron ore to crude oil are shrinking the windfall that Australia’s government hoped would support spending on new infrastructure and some of the most generous social welfare plans in the world. Falling demand from China, which buys about a third of Australia’s exports, has been a major contributing factor in the drop in commodity prices, and the timing couldn’t be worse for Australia.

China’s appetite for minerals has slowed just as many of those resources projects have ramped up production, forcing Australia’s resource-rich economy to face a painful adjustment.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:42:43

ft dot com > Markets >
beyondbrics

December 10, 2014 3:36 pm
Rising dollar set to harm emerging markets
By Alan Beattie and Jonathan Wheatley in London

As emerging markets have slowed along with the world economy over the past few years, their exporters have struggled to chase after global demand. In principle, a general depreciation in their currencies, of the sort that accelerated sharply this week, could help.

Yet, there is little reason to believe this will happen. Not only is the depreciation as likely to be a consequence of economic weakness as a cure, but the benefit of competitiveness will most probably be outweighed by falling confidence and rising burdens of debt.

Part of the problem is that falling prices of oil and other commodities have been more bad than good for emerging economies as a whole. Commodities exporters have lost more than importers have gained, says David Lubin, head of emerging markets economics at Citi Research.

“When commodities prices fall, it’s not easy to be confident about emerging markets,” he says. “EM is a commodities exporting asset class and portfolio flows are discouraged as risk appetite falls.”

Even a commodities importer such as Turkey is suffering. Mr Lubin notes that some of the gains on Ankara’s current account from cheaper oil imports have been countered by what has happened to the capital account, where portfolio flows have slowed. The Turkish lira has resumed its slide after staging a recovery in the first quarter of this year.

In commodities-exporting Brazil, where in 2010 ministers complained that the weak US dollar was putting the country at an unfair disadvantage, the weak real has not delivered the gains expected. This is a demonstration that for Brazil and others, a depreciating currency is not enough. Its benefits have been outweighed by a failure to raise competitiveness through investment in productivity.

Of course, inferring fundamental lessons from short-term movements in exchange rates is risky and that is even more true now than ever. Intermittent, extreme liquidity shortages over the past two months have made all asset prices jumpy, suggesting an even bigger role than usual for the near-unknowables of positioning and leverage in driving currency values. Still, whatever is determining exchange rates, the fall in emerging market currencies is more likely to underline current economic fragility than it is to boost future growth.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:49:15

Putin the Great, and the collapse of the Russian economy
Michael Hiltzik
Los Angeles Times
December 12, 2014 1:51 P.M.
Who’s the big cheese now? U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin in a rare personal encounter at November’s APEC summit in Beijing. (Alexey Druzhinin / AFP/Getty Images)

In certain corners of conservative thought, it’s been fashionable to portray Russian President Vladimir Putin as a master strategist who has outdueled Barack Obama at every turn.
The big problems are economic growth and the standard of living, which will deteriorate. - Economist Anders Aslund, on the future for the Russian economy

This view reached its zenith this year, in the aftermath of Russia’s takeover of Crimea and the start of its armed intervention in Ukraine. Its epicenter could be found in the Mitt Romney camp, which interpreted events as proof that Romney was right to place Russia at the top of the list of threats to the U.S. during the presidential campaign, and to label Obama as naive.

Those voices haven’t been heard much lately, and with good reason. Putin’s adventure in Ukraine has been an unmitigated diplomatic and economic disaster. In terms of domestic politics, it may be on the verge of undermining his public standing.

Russia expert Anders Aslund has just weighed in with a stark assessment of the state of the Russian economy. He concedes his view is more negative than others’, but not by much. And he’s surely correct in forecasting that things will get much worse before they get better.

Russia has been hit with a “triple whammy,” Aslund observes. First, awful domestic policies, yoking protectionism to crony capitalism: the Putin kleptocracy is in full cry. (See Anne Applebaum in the New York Review of Books and Karen Dawisha’s new book for more on this.) Second, Western sanctions stemming from the Ukraine invasion are biting hard; Russian external debt can’t be refinanced and government reserves, which have been overstated by as much as 100%, are shrinking fast.

That leaves Russia even more unable to deal with Whammy Three: the collapse in oil prices. The ruble exchange rate tracks the price of oil, so the price decline is neutral to the economy in some respects. But not others. Aslund, in a related op-ed: “The big problems are economic growth and the standard of living, which will deteriorate.” The low exchange rate compounded by protectionism will drive inflation, already about 8.5%, even higher, he predicts. These effects are spurring capital flight.

The consensus forecast for Russian growth, which was 2.5% at the beginning of the year, is now zero, Aslund writes. Given the prospect that the three whammies will gather force in 2015, “a prediction of a decline in Russia’s GDP of 1 percent next year sounds optimistic.”

Ruble rate
Look out below: The value of the ruble since June. In that time the number of rubles that $1 would buy you has gone from about 34 to about 54. (Bloomberg)

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 16:23:20

Dumb question of the day: Is there at least some chance collapsing oil prices will eventually catch up with U.S. housing prices?

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 10:41:48

Costco was $2.39 yesterday. Filled up my evil gas guzzling V8 SUV for just a shade over $50.

 
 
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 03:34:50

If you are moosleem man, woman or child, would you rather be tortured CIA style or droned?

 
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-13 04:44:24

Realtors are liars.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 07:56:13

“Realtors are liars.”

You can say that again.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 09:25:27

OK, I will. Realtors are liars.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 15:08:09

Thank you. May I?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-12-13 05:42:17

I googled-up “Six Sigma Sucks” and it came back with 57,700 hits.

I then googled-up “Six Sigma Really Sucks” and got back 119,000 hits.

So the winner, buy a wide margin, is …

(drum roll)

SIX SIGMA REALLY SUCKS!

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2014-12-13 05:52:44

Recount, please-

I googled-up “Six Sigma blows goats” and it came back with “About 2,110,000 results (0.55 seconds)”.

Comment by Combotechie
2014-12-13 06:31:09

This MUST be true, Six Sigma MUST blow goats because the numbers positively says it does.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-13 09:27:22

So Combo, does your company do six-sigma “blitzes”?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Combotechie
2014-12-13 09:53:57

I don’t know what a Six Sigma “blitz” is (and I probably don’t want to know) probably because I, myself, am not directly involved in the Six Sigma process - I only have to DEAL with results of these processes.

Or, rather, my boss has to deal with the results of these processes. I more-or-less get to sit back and watch.

There is a management concept that has somehow sprung into being which goes something like “A good manager can manage anything”. This concept implies that a manager doesn’t have to know anything at all about a job (knowing a job is what workers need to know), all a manager needs to know is how to manage the workers.

Then in steps the Six Sigma folks who also do not need to know the job, all they need to know is how to manage the managers who manage the workers who know the job. And these Six Sigma folks grade their success (not their failures because there is no allowance for failing) by the use of numbers - and as everyone knows numbers do not lie, not ever.

So the edicts pour forth the from the all-knowing Six Sigma folks to the managers that manage the workers and the workers laugh at these edicts because most of them are just pain stupid but nevertheless these edicts MUST be implemented and so they are and the numbers that emanate from these edicts suck - really and truly suck - and thus these numbers have to be “cooked” a bit before they are reported up the line to the Six Sigma folks who become HAPPY AS HELL because the cooked-up numbers that are presented to them turn out to be the EXACT numbers that they demanded be given to them.

Funny how that is (snort).

 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-12-13 10:12:45

I said this once before but it bears repeating:

In the company I work for power - true power - has shifted from the management ranks to the ranks of the workers BECAUSE the management ranks depend on the workers to supply them with success as represented by numbers and the only way these successful numbers can be obtained is by … by lying.

Soooooo … if a worker bee does not like the queen bee all the worker bee has to do to remove the queen bee is report the truth - report the truth as represented by numbers. If the numbers do not fall into line then the queen bee will be removed and another queen bee will take her place. And probably the new queen bee will treat the workers, oh, so wonderfully, because she knows - KNOWS - that if she jacks any of us around - jacks any ONE of us around (because it only takes one of us) - then she, too, will be replaced.

It makes for an interesting dynamic.

 
Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 14:26:58

“There is a management concept that has somehow sprung into being which goes something like “A good manager can manage anything”. This concept implies that a manager doesn’t have to know anything at all about a job (knowing a job is what workers need to know), all a manager needs to know is how to manage the workers.”

Happening at my company, not my department yet, but I see it in others and it’s crazy. This is technology man, having a non-tech manager is horrible.

#FundamentalTransformationOfCorporateAmerica.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 10:58:13

You don’t need a train engineer to manage a train schedule. It’s perfectly reasonable to have non-tech people manage tech projects. Some of the best managers I have seen have been people who didn’t really know how the “stuff” got done, but they made the “stuff” get done on time and on budget.

Techies have this sense that what they do is special. It really isn’t. Building software or building a car is the same thing from a managerial standpoint. You have inputs, outputs, employees, deadlines, quality control, etc. An experienced manager of an assembly line should be able to manage an IT rollout and vice versa.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 12:05:54

Went to a lecture on Six Sigma when I was a defense company employee in late 90s. It sucks for sure. Some pointy headed Ivy League type somehow conned companies into it.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 10:44:41

Ever get an email from someone who has PMP, after their name in the signature? That to me indicates a d-bag level of at least an 8/10.

If their signature has any mention of Six Sigma, that d-bag level is a perfect 10/10.

A PMP and Six Sigma….that bad boy is in Spinal Tap 11+ range.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 06:25:00

Presenting The $303 Trillion In Derivatives That US Taxpayers Are Now On The Hook For

Tyler Durden’s
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/12/2014 07:52 -0500

Courtesy of the Cronybus(sic) last minute passage, government was provided a quid-pro-quo $1.1 trillion spending allowance with Wall Street’s blessing in exchange for assuring banks that taxpayers would be on the hook for yet another bailout, as a result of the swaps push-out provision, after incorporating explicit Citigroup language that allows financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, explicitly putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by these contracts. Recall:

Five years after the Wall Street coup of 2008, it appears the U.S. House of Representatives is as bought and paid for as ever. We heard about the Citigroup crafted legislation currently being pushed through Congress back in May when Mother Jones reported on it. Fortunately, they included the following image in their article:

Screen Shot 2014-12-05 at 3.32.12 PM

Unsurprisingly, the main backer of the bill is notorious Wall Street lackey Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a former Goldman Sachs employee who has discovered lobbyist payoffs can be just as lucrative as a career in financial services.

At least we now know with certainty that to a clear majority in Congress - one consisting of republicans and democrats - the future viability of Wall Street is far more important than the well-being of their constituents. Which also, implicitly, was made clear when Hank Paulson was waving a three-page “blank check” term sheet, and when Congress voted through the biggest bailout of banks in US history back in 2008.

The only question is when the next multi-trillion (or perhaps quadrillion now that all global central banks are all in?) bailout takes place.

http://www.zerohedge.com/…/presenting-303-trillion-derivatives-us-taxpayers-are-now-hook - 160k -

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-13 06:56:44

“… assuring banks that taxpayers would be on the hook for yet another bailout …”

(chuckle)

“At least we now know with certainty that to a clear majority in Congress - one consisting of republicans and democrats - the future viability of Wall Street is far more important than the well-being of their constituents.”

“… well being of their constituents.”

Oh, please, spare me!

“Which also, implicitly, was made clear when Hank Paulson was waving a three-page “blank check” term sheet, and when Congress voted through the biggest bailout of banks in US history back in 2008.”

Bahahahahahaha … apparently some people cannot take a joke.

Again and again and again I must have to keep reminding you pukes of one thing: “You cannot lose with the stuff I use”.

Bahahahahaha .. go to the polls and vote for the party of your choice, the candidate of your choice, but always remember this:

The two candidates that have been selected for you to pick and choose from that were put before you by the cigar-smoking-back-room-political-bosses that rule - RULE - the two dominant political parties have already been through a selection process that filtered out the poster boys that do not fit in with the agenda of the PTB.

Remember this, and while you are remembering this add to your drastically diminished memory cells the identity of just who it is that makes up the membership of the PTB, just who it is it that gets to call the shots?

Bahahahaha … if you somehow are able to come up with some sort of relationship between MONEY and the candidates then you are beginning to home in on the truth. And if you can come with an answer to the question of just who it is that controls the money that backs it all then you are REALLY homing in on the truth.

Bahahahahaha … You cannot lose with the stuff I use.

Reverend Ike, I love you for showing me the way.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-12-13 11:58:14

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 06:25:00

Presenting The $303 Trillion In Derivatives That US Taxpayers Are Now On The Hook For
zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-12/presenting-303-trillion-derivatives-us-taxpayers-are-now-hook

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 06:29:18

Time for another obama bailout?

—————–

US stocks slump to worst weekly loss in more than two years as oil rout continues
AP | December 12, 2014 | Steve Rothwell

NEW YORK — A rout in oil prices shook financial markets Friday, pushing stocks to their worst weekly loss in two and a half years.

The stock market fell sharply as investors worried that slumping oil demand is signaling that growth outside of the U.S. is weaker than earlier thought. And while consumers and airlines will benefit from lower fuel prices, energy companies will see their earnings suffer. Some may even go out of business.

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 06:41:47

But Gold went on a tear…

———–

Gold set for biggest weekly rise in six months as stocks, dollar slip
Reuters - 12/12/2014

LONDON (Reuters) - Gold edged lower on Friday as some buyers cashed in recent gains, but remained on track for its biggest weekly rise since June as the dollar retreated and sliding oil prices hurt risk appetite and stocks.

Gold is up nearly 3 percent so far this week, following a 2.1 percent jump the previous week. Falling stock markets have prompted some investors to buy the metal as an alternative asset, while a drop in the greenback made dollar-priced bullion cheaper for other currency holders.

Spot gold was down 0.2 percent at 1302 GMT at $1,225.10 an ounce at 1302 GMT, while U.S. gold futures for December delivery fell 30 cents to $1,225.30.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2014-12-13 06:59:30

The negative correlation of precious metals to equities is a key reason for including them in your portfolio.

On a week when equities took a hit, precious metals rose.

Of course the inverse is also true. In the past 3 years precious metals are down about 30% while equities are way up.

Comment by azdude
2014-12-13 07:40:27

gold is money cause it holds its value over time. It is divisible. It is easily stored. It has intrinsic value.

paper is money by decree!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 07:43:13

gold is money cause it holds its value over time. It is divisible. It is easily stored. It has intrinsic value.

Then so is good whiskey! :-)

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 07:50:08

Exactly. And that is why gold is the money of free people and fiat currency is the “money” of serfs.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-13 11:09:45

Then so is good whiskey ??

Not as compared to a single malt scotch… :>)

 
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 08:03:32

Did someone say “alternative asset?”

Yes often gold is not correlated to stocks. And when the interest rates rise, institutions will dump bonds and stocks. The time to dump is now. At least bag the biggest gainers.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2014-12-13 08:26:20

Bill stores his gold in the pantry behind the oatmeal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 08:51:27

At least two boxes of oatmeal.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 08:50:54

Up $25 on extreme panic demand. BFD.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 10:08:00

Extreme panic? I thought you said the oil crash was based on fundamentals?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 06:39:41

Only bigger and bigger government, with more and more spending and higher and higher taxes can save us…

BTW - if a private organization had 25% of its activity/business as fraudulent - would the owners be in jail? (except for bankers and John Corzine, of course).

—————————-

IRS Gave $14.5 Billion in Low-Income Tax Credits to the Wrong People
The Fiscal Times
Brianna Ehley -12/12/2014 - Yahoo

The federal watchdog tasked with keeping tabs on the Internal Revenue Service says the agency needs to do a better job of administering tax credits for low-income people. The reason? Billions of dollars each year are ending up in the wrong hands.

A new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, reveals that nearly a quarter of the $63 billion worth of Earned Income Tax Credits distributed in 2012 were improper payments.

That’s about $14.5 billion in erroneous payments that were either given to the wrong people or distributed to the right people in the wrong amount.

That amount is likely to rise since up to 5 million additional people might qualify and apply for the EITC thanks to President Obama’s executive order on immigration. The EITC includes qualified resident aliens who pay taxes.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 07:24:31

Nowhere near enough jail cells for all these fraudsters.

 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:44:37

Gov. gives WalMart $6.2 billion in support for its workers.
Alcoa — $5.64 Billion
Boeing — $13.18 Billion
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles — $2.06 Billion

I hate welfare for shareholders.

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 10:52:08

Just wait until the 5 million newly amnestied illegals start getting EITC. $14.5B will be a rounding error. And we all know that 5 million is a BS number. There will be so much fraud involved with the amnesty that 5 million will eventually be 7 or 8 million, easy. And all of them will qualify for EITC, SNAP and every other alphabet govt welfare program.

But it’s cool, I get to save 3 cents on a head of lettuce so it makes good economic sense to spend $100B a year to make that happen.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 06:42:22

Relax, the dead dude is a white guy.

We will not need to call in Al Sharpton or burn Chippewa Falls to the ground.

Man Speeds to Hospital for Asthma Attack, Police Stop Him and Won’t Let Him Go — He Dies

CHIPPEWA FALLS — A disturbing raw video has surfaced online showing police pull over a desperate man in need of medical assistance and causing his death over a “traffic violation.”

The footage comes from a police dashcam video. On November 30, Casey Kressin was pulled over for “speeding” and “failing to stop” at a traffic light.

It turns out that Casey was having an asthma attack and was rushing to a nearby hospital.

“He’s having an asthma attack! He’s going to die if we don’t get him to the hospital!” said the driver, Leah Hryniewicki.

Instead of escorting him to the hospital so that his life could be saved, police detained him for nearly 10 minutes.

Casey can be seen kneeling on the pavement.

“Help please,” Casey said, pleading for his life.

“Can’t we just go? I would have made it there by now!” the driver said to the officer.

The officer called for an ambulance, which took nearly 6 minutes to arrive.

The officer himself then refused to administer medical aid as Casey laid dying on the ground, stating that he would have to wait for the ambulance, which would have “oxygen” for him.

Had it not been for the cop, they would have been at the hospital already.

The cop continued detaining them by force, as Casey’s life was slipping through the cracks.

The ambulance finally arrived, and another 2 and 1/2 minutes passed for medical personnel to strap Casey in the ambulance. The cop finally allowed them to leave.

Unfortunately, it was too late. Casey was pronounced dead at the hospital, thanks to the callous and mindless actions of police.

Watch video below – Warning: Viewer Discretion Advised

filmingcops.com/…/ - 112k -

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 06:50:05

“She Couldn’t Breathe” – The Brutal Murder of 19 Year Old Jessica Lane Chambers
Conservative Treehouse | 12/9/2014 | sundance

19-Year-Old Jessica Lane Chambers was brutally murdered in Mississippi two nights ago.

Unfortunately the details of her murder are so horrific to comprehend they make the current racial anxiety in the headlines seem small, yet also potentially more explosive.

…When the fire department got there, she was walking down the road on fire. […] They squirted lighter fluid down her throat and in her nose…

Yes, Jessica was white; and no, by all accounts her killer(s) were not.

She wasn’t just attacked, beaten, and burned alive – she was brutalized beyond all horrific imaginings. When you identify what took place, and contrast her horrific murder against the current national dialogue, you can also understand why the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation (MBI), and all Mississippi politicians, will most likely lead the media to bury this story as quick as possible.

 
Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 07:41:56

More cop hater propaganda the Obama coalition. Looks like the ambulance got there pretty quick, 6 minutes.

There are about 750,000 cops in the US. 248 for every 100,000 people. Your man bites dog stories even if you want to post ten a day mean nothing to the hundreds of thousands of daily interactions between people and law enforcement. Lives are saved, babies are birthed, CPR is administered, accident victims are pulled from burning vehicles. All that happens and more, not to mention the violent thugs arrested or properly shot. And again, yes, there are some problem cops, police unions are an abomination, militarization is inappropriate, etc. But cop haters are manipulated fools.

Put your hands up. Obey lawful orders.

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 07:53:51

Only looting Foot Lockers will bring us social justice

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 09:20:47

“More cop hater propaganda the Obama coalition.”

I’m not a cop hater, just looking at the double standard of what hits the news.

There are good cops and bad cops and a lot more good than bad. The one in this story happened to be a stupid cop. My link didn’t show but if you google it and watch the video the cop should have clearly said follow me with the lights on the 2 miles to the hospital.

As far as… “Put your hands up. Obey lawful orders.”

You are 100% correct, if the race hustlers really wanted to save “black lives” they would be pushing that rather than cops profiling minorities.

However, IMHO there has been a military “no more hesitation” mindset instilled in American police forces. No Knock raids on small time drug dealers where a flash grenade is thrown into a baby’s crib by a SWAT team, not cool. Rolling an army of cops in MRAPs into a town that was ordered to shelter in place and pointing weapons at the citizens for that BS up in Boston, not cool. Police departments training with the military in U.S. cities, not cool.

But you are right about obeying lawful orders from a police officer and I would even throw in what my father told me when I was a kid. While you are obeying what police tell you what to do, say yes Sir, no Sir or Ma’am as the case may be.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 10:46:14

Then you and I sir are in agreement. I am sorry and apologize for calling you a cop hater. I will not do it again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 10:59:03

No apology necessary.

As I tell people in the real world…

You’ll have to do better than that to hurt my feelings. :)

It’s cool, have a good day.

 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-12-13 12:38:22

I had an emergency situation once in the middle of the night (20+ years ago) My husband blew every light and stop sign on the way from down from the Bronx to a hospital in upper Manhattan. He told me later a cop car started following us, but hung back a distance, no lights, no siren even though they saw us speeding and only slowing down at intersections. When we reached the hospital they pulled away. I guess you could argue they might have stopped us to help, but we were glad they just let us keep going. That was then - common sense. What they’re teaching them now…

We had (all retired) three NYC cops in the family. They had some stories.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-13 11:14:25

And again, yes, there are some problem cops ??

But here is the problem…When you are confronted or have to interact, how do you know which is a good cop or bad cop particularly if there is nobody else around….

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:36:15

And if you are the cop, how do you know whether the 6′4″ 290 lb unarmed teenager who recently tried to take away your gun and punched you in the face, who now is charging your direction, will behave nonviolently once he catches up to you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-12-13 12:04:02

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 06:42:22

Man Speeds to Hospital for Asthma Attack, Police Stop Him and Won’t Let Him Go — He Dies
filmingcops.com/man-speeds-to-hospital-for-asthma-attack-police-stop-him-and-wont-let-him-go-he-dies/

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 06:54:14

Just calm down.

It appears to be a white dude getting beat, no Sharpton needed.

Buffalo cop suspended for repeatedly hitting man with baton
Man hit has hired a lawyer to likely file lawsuit

Ed Drantch
6:30 PM, Dec 11, 2014

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) - Buffalo Police Officer Corey Krug was caught on camera by one of our 7 Eyewitness News Photographers, hitting a man with his baton, early on Thanksgiving morning.

Krug is off the job and is suspended without pay. Police are looking into the video and what Krug is recorded doing.

With his nightstick in hand, Officer Corey Krug stormed down Chippewa Street, early Thanksgiving morning. Video shows him going to confront a man, who was seemingly about to get into a fight. But confrontation quickly turned physical.

Officers rushed to the scene. Krug told the man on the ground to get up. The officer winds up and swings his baton again.

Those officers who rushed to the scene told Krug he was being recorded on camera. It was our photographer who was documenting the altercation. He was following police officers on the job, when he saw Officer Krug hitting the man and then letting him walk away.

“They’re telling this guy to walk away so apparently he did nothing,” said Daire Irwin. Irwin is an attorney with the New York Civil Liberties Union.

http://www.wkbw.com/news/buffalo-police-officer-suspended-for-beating-man - 292k -

Comment by Dman
2014-12-13 14:03:13

If only he had followed the cops lawful orders, I’m sure things would have gone differently. Of course, if he’d been black, he’d be dead. “He had a hoodie, and I was scared.” Nothing to see here, grand jury.

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 20:04:47

“He had a hoodie, and I was scared.”

Watch What Happened When Two Thugs Started a Gunfight With a …
http://www.infowars.com/74-year-old-woman-wins-gunfight-with-criminal-thugs/ - 81k - Cached - Similar pages
3 days ago … A 74-year-old woman came out on top of a gunfight with two criminal thugs after they tried to rob her pawn shop in Springdale, Arkansas

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-13 14:05:42

Just calm down.

It appears to be a white dude getting beat, no Sharpton needed.

What are you getting at with this statement? Here’s one way to look at it. This sort of thing goes on quite a bit. Americans of all colors are victims of this bad behavior by some cops. Every once in a while, when it happens to a black guy, lots of blacks protest and make a big fuss. I can’t remember an incident when a bunch of white people protested when the victim was white. So black people occasionally try to do something about the problem. White people are sheep who sit and take it.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-13 15:59:03

White people are sheep who sit and take it.

Badge lickers

Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 17:06:45

Tell your local cops not to respond to emergency calls at your residence or cell phone numbers, then post signs on your house and cars saying such.

You don’t have to be a badge licker to cooperate with an officer when confronted.

I can’t wait for body cameras, they will put the race pimps out of business…although, I think they (race pimps) will turn their attentions to armed citizens using deadly force against criminals.

#ImagineYourCityWithoutPoliceProtection
#MadMax

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 10:47:08

“Tell your local cops not to respond to emergency calls at your residence or cell phone numbers, then post signs on your house and cars saying such.”

And while you’re at it make a sign that says GUN FREE HOME and put that sign in the front yard.

 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 17:19:35

That’s my name for them. Badge lickers who bring their own Vaseline.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 16:54:36

“So black people occasionally try to do something about the problem. White people are sheep who sit and take it.”

“Krug is off the job and is suspended without pay.”

The cop is off the job and they are going to get sued. What would you suggest a looting and burn this bit#h down approach?

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 07:10:51

How many of you DebtJunkies are on the hook for a lifetime of earnings on a depreciating asset at a grossly inflated price?

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-13 07:19:10

Whatever the number, it’s not enough.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-13 07:28:32

Bahahaha … sing it, Janis:

“Freedom’s just another word for nuthin’ left to lose, and you ain’t nuthin’ if you ain’t free”.

Visit your local banker soon and ask him about his Freedom Plan.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 08:53:26

Jefferson Airplane made the more relevant point:

You better find somebody to love.

I go to a nursing home once, sometimes twice a week. It is very sobering. Hug your kids, hug a cop, hug whomever, but hug someone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:42:18

Thanks for the question.

My answer for HA is 111% of the population. Hope that helps your day be more productive and less angry. :)

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 17:26:10

Pick yourself up off the floor and cheer up Lolacado. Housing prices are falling.

Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 20:01:40

What is this, 4th grade?

No…you’re dumb.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 21:29:18

Don’t be angry Lolacado. Cheer up!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 07:28:43

“The Coniglios said the bank badgered them after they had fallen behind on their house payments”

Couple wins $1M after receiving 700 calls from Bank of America

By Yaron Steinbuch
December 12, 2014 | 3:30pm

A Florida couple who got more than 700 collection calls from Bank of America over four years will now do a little collecting of their own — to the tune of more than $1 million.

“Unrelenting,” said Joyce Coniglio of Tampa.
Modal Trigger

“They treated us very badly,” said her husband, Nelson. “No two ways about it.”

The Coniglios said the bank badgered them after they had fallen behind on their house payments, local station WTSP reported.

“Bank of America has helped 2 million homeowners avoid foreclosure. Our calls to the Coniglios were not to collect a debt, but rather to help them avoid foreclosure after they fell behind on their mortgage payments in 2009,” bank senior vice president Dan Frahm said, ABC News reported.

nypost.com/…/12/12/couple-wins-1m-after-receiving-700-calls-from-bank-of-america/ - 144k -

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-13 07:36:40

“ Our calls to the Coniglios were not to collect a debt, but rather to help them avoid foreclosure after they fell behind on their mortgage payments in 2009,” bank senior vice president Dan Frahm said, ABC News reported.”

Bahahaha … and the best way to avoid a foreclosure is to PAY YOUR MORTGAGE!

It’s a pity that BofA had to call these people 700 times to remind them of this fact - and what does BofA get in return for trying to help these pukes out? Why, they get sued!

Truly, there is very little justice in this world.

Comment by Lemming with an innertube
2014-12-13 08:40:24

I’m dying to know. Did their mortgage finally get paid?

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 07:39:02

Bank of America should not pay a dime (just like a FB in a foreclosure) and see how the Coniglios try to collect their money…

Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-13 07:48:03

Bahahaha … maybe the Coniglios should have to call Bank of America 700 times? And if they do this then BofA could then sue them?

Bahahahaha … I like it.

 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-12-13 12:56:04

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 07:28:43

Couple wins $1M after receiving 700 calls from Bank of America
nypost.com/2014/12/12/couple-wins-1m-after-receiving-700-calls-from-bank-of-america/

 
 
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 07:32:31

I am reading the hacked sony emails. Doesn’t surprise me much….I have come to know these types of people over the years….some of the stuff they tell in person makes you blush and sad thing is they set the narratives for this country.

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 07:41:34

2banana’s Rule:

Conservatives are more than happy to live under the same laws and pay the same taxes they want for everyone else.

Liberals/progressive expect to exempted from the laws and taxes they want for everyone else.

Comment by butters
2014-12-13 07:57:47

No you don’t unless you want to be tortured, spied and droned. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 08:04:56

How many rich liberals do you think will be waiting in line under obamacare?

Compare the school lunches of the obama children to the ones Michelle wants for your kids.

How many rich liberals politicians are going to give up their armed guards but expect you to be defenseless?

I could go on for hours.

Conservative could care less if a non US top level terrorist is “tortured” by some yelling, sleep deprivation and some water being poured on his head in order to give up info to save American lives. Do it ALL day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 08:21:15

Top Level? LOL

How many more goat herders would you like torture before it satisfies your thirst? Why are you so afraid of living under the same law?

BTW, why do you fear goat herders so much?

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 08:37:15

You really have drank the liberal kool-aid.

We are talking about of handful of top level terrorists over a decade.

If these were all deaths in Chicago over just a month - it would be just about average.

BTW - international law for dealing with terrorists, saboteurs, piracy and partisans is summary execution. When are we going to live under the law?

——————–

America Trades Torture for Drones
The Senate’s report on CIA interrogation closes one dark chapter—and leaves another open.
Kathy Gilsinan - Dec 9 2014 - The Atlantic

Tuesday’s report from the Senate Intelligence Committee, meanwhile, lists 119 terror suspects known to have been detained by the CIA, of whom “at least 39 were subject to the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques.”

 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 11:05:43

Liberals/progressive expect to exempted from the laws and taxes they want for everyone else.

__________

Warren Buffett, Obama BFF and proponent of higher taxes for the masses, owes the IRS $1B and is doing all he can to avoid paying that back tax.

GE, whose CEO is also an Obama BFF and was in the Obama administration, paid $0 in taxes in 2012.

Facebook, whose is CEO is an Obama bootlicker and proponent of higher taxes, paid $0 taxes in the UK in 2012 and 2013.

And there are hundreds of these examples. They all have one thing in common…a millionaire/billionaire liberal who wants everyone else to pay 75% tax rates, yet has an army of lawyers/accountants to make sure they pay no taxes.

 
 
 
Comment by butters
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 08:21:05

Still way too many liberals and RINOs left in congress.

Remember: Republican does equal a conservative. Only a small minority of republicans are conservative. And up until the 1990s, there were even conservative democrats.

Ever wonder why Reid and obama pushed so hard for this budget?

And why Cruz is opposing it so fiercely in the senate (without ONE DEMOCRAT senator helping him)?

——-

Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, isn’t wasting any time. Minutes after the House passed a controversial omnibus spending bill, she tweeted: “Speaker Boehner & House GOP leadership have found a way to needlessly squander political capital, after being handed a historic majority.”

The bill, literally crafted behind closed doors in cigar smoke-filled rooms by a handful of legislators and staffers, fully funds President Obama’s unconstitutional executive actions granting amnesty to illegal aliens.

The House of Representatives passed the 1,700-plus page, $1 trillion-plus CR-Omnibus budget bill by a 219 to 206 margin late Thursday night, barely two hours before the clock struck midnight and the federal government would have shut down.

Only 162 Republicans voted for the bill, while 67 opposed it. The bill passed because 57 Democrats — encouraged by Obama and Vice President Joe Biden — crossed the aisle to vote yes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2014-12-13 08:27:15

Boohooo….Obama this, Rino that.

One phone call from Goldman, Cruz will bend over like Tom Cruise in secret Scientology gatherings….

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 08:43:58

One phone call from Goldman, Cruz will bend over like Tom Cruise in secret Scientology gatherings…

Considering every democrat in the senate has is already doing Goldman’s bidding.

Our only hope is a few CONSERVATIVES in the DEMOCRAT controlled senate.

Let that sink in for a while.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 11:11:16

“This is what happens when you vote “conservatives.”

Since when is John Boehner a conservative?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 08:07:00

Libertarian’s want one of those thugs’ thuggery laws.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 09:02:00

One…meant none

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:51:53

2banana’s Rule:

Conservatives are more than happy to put profits before patriotism. (see Bush War and Recession)

Liberals/progressive expect people and the planet to come first.

Vote Green Party!

Comment by Mr. Smithers
2014-12-14 11:13:18

“Liberals/progressive expect people and the planet to come first.”

That’s why Al Gore lives in a 14,000 sq ft home. And it’s also why every Hollywood “green” activist flies around in a private jet.

Makes sense.

PS: How many evil gas guzzling SUVs does Obama take with him when he goes on a trip? Surely he could be provided the same protection in a Prius or Honda Civic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2014-12-13 08:01:54

The NSA hacks emails, phone calls … and most everything else on a continuing basis.

This hacked Sony email story is just a hint - a HINT - as to what can be done to people and their careers and such with a few judicious revelations of what is being recorded.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 08:57:33

I believe SkyNet may have become self aware.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 07:48:47

These dead and wounded blacks don’t matter…

But hey - There is still two weeks left — Chicago might still reach 400 murdered this year in Chicago.

At least Chicago has a gun ban.

——————

2 dead, 13 others wounded in separate shootings
Chicago Tribune | December 13, 2014 | By Rosemary Regina Sobol

Two men were killed and 13 other people, including a 15-year-old boy, were wounded since Friday in separate shootings on the city’s Far South and West sides, said police.

Around 7:03 p.m., a 28-year-old man was fatally shot while he sat in a vehicle on the 1300 block of North Springfield Avenue. The man was in the vehicle with a female child when someone came up to the vehicle and began shooting.

According to WGN TV, the man had a 3-year-old girl who was possibly his daughter on his lap at the time.

Earlier Friday afternoon, two people were shot on the West Side, including a 15-year-old boy.

The boy was standing with a male friend on the front porch of a home in the 1100 block of South Francisco Avenue.

Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 17:13:29

Doesn’t support the narrative, police shootings do.

“Never let a good crisis go to waste”

-Rham Emanuel

Witness the communist rent-a-mobs assembling tonight in a city near you. The revcom’s, progressives and neo-marxists care not a wit about “I can’t breathe”, they just want continuous chaos.

#ClowardAndPivenStrategy

 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 20:03:28

Like Iraq, let them work it out among themselves. Social Darwinism.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 08:32:01

It’s ironic how we’ve drilled and parsed down and crystallized the liars via discussion of……… drilling.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-13 08:36:38

‘The American war against the Islamic State has become the most opaque conflict the United States has undertaken in more than two decades, a fight that’s so underreported that U.S. officials and their critics can make claims about progress, or lack thereof, with no definitive data available to refute or bolster their positions.’

‘The dearth of information by which to judge the conflict is one of the difficulties for those trying to track progress in it. The U.S. military, which started out announcing every air mission almost as soon as it ended, now publishes roundups of airstrikes three times a week. Those releases often don’t specify which strikes happened on what days or even whether a targeted site was successfully hit. McClatchy has discovered that in some cases, the location given for bombings has been inaccurate by nearly 100 miles.’

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 08:46:36

ISIS is on the move in Anbar even today and Russia is claiming that their numbers have swelled to over 70,000. The level of bombing that is going on is just a good recruitment tool for ISIS. Even heavier bombing would just result in a change of tactics. They will take a flock of sheep into the desert and have a source of food, clothes and a sex life and just make raids from time to time.

Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:46:50

I wish Obama never invaded in 2003.

Can we mail them some cash?

As long as we raise campaign contributions all is OK in the world.

Jeb 2016!

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-13 22:48:12

‘I wish Obama never invaded in 2003.’

You come off disabled or something. Am I right?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-13 08:48:10

Obama says his is ‘most transparent administration’ ever
Jonathan Easley - The Hill - February 14, 2013

President Obama on Thursday hailed his administration for its transparency.

“This is the most transparent administration in history,” Obama said during a Google Plus “Fireside” Hangout.

 
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2014-12-13 11:34:00

Back in 2006, Joe Biden suggested that Iraq should be split into three states — one each for the Sunnis, Shiites and the Kurds. He was laughed at. Turns out he was probably right, had the Sunnis gotten their own state ISIS might not exist today.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-13 11:57:33

‘Biden suggested that Iraq should be split into three states’

I heard that years before 2006, and it wasn’t from Biden.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 12:33:53

Works for the Kurds and the Shiites but leaves the Sunnis with virtually no oil, they will never agree and Saudi Arabia will never allow it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 14:40:58

Islamists of all shapes and sizes are totalitarians bent on global expansion and chaos, why do you think the global progressives and revolutionary communists support them?

You could give the islamists all of their demands tomorrow, all of the land, all of the tribal separation, nukes…you name it; and it will not change their behavior in the slightest.

Hard to swallow I know, but it’s absolutely true.

#KillingInfidelsIsTheirBusinessAndBusinessIsGood

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-13 14:08:47

Maybe Biden should just mind his own business and let the Iraqis work it out for themselves.

Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 17:30:34

That’s what we wanted in 2003. $5 trillion ago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2014-12-13 08:42:28

Thank you for the kind words Combo. My life really kicked into overdrive in the last year, so I’m mostly relegated to late-night lurking after all the work, tasks, chores, laundry, cleaning, tucking in, reading, etc. are done. My day starts at 5a.m. and I don’t sit down until 9pm or so. I’ve also made it a point to dedigitalize as much as possible for the sake of my kids. I’m pretty sure this pace will be sending me to an early grave, but what choice do I have? You either drop out and collect disability, or swim with the sharks.

“- Marital stress, partly driven by not owning a home…If it wasn’t for not owning a home it would just be something else. Any couple that has celebrated a 50th wedding anniversary has gone through some sh#t to get there.”

True. At one point I was certain we were headed for divorce, then things just smoothed out a bit. I have no doubt we’ll grow old together, but she still needs to cool it on the house thing. It’s not time yet. She really pressed hard last June during renewal, but I said no.

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 09:50:43

“but she still needs to cool it on the house thing. It’s not time yet. She really pressed hard last June during renewal, but I said no.”

I will probably get in trouble for this but I will say it anyway. It probably has something to do with that nesting cr@p. I remember coming home when my wife was about 8 months pregnant with each of our 3 kids and all the furniture in the place was somewhere else. I mean stuff that would have taken 2 grown men to move was on the other side of the house.

So although you are undoubtedly right about the timing of the purchase you may want to give her a break. She may be fighting some super human urge to own a home for her kids.

 
Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 10:55:08

This becomes much easier to fight when you can point to a chart showing price drops of 10 percent or more since a peak earlier this year. If it aint there for you yet, it will be soon.

 
Comment by rms
2014-12-14 04:30:18

“…I’m mostly relegated to late-night lurking after all the work, tasks, chores, laundry, cleaning, tucking in, reading, etc. are done. My day starts at 5a.m. and I don’t sit down until 9pm or so.”

+1 Welcome to married with kidz. There’s no doubt in my mind why the welfare rolls have swollen,,,why so many men decide to skip. Just imagine adding a bubble priced shack to top it off. Gotta wonder who coined this nightmare the American dream?

 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 12:11:41

I am in San Rafael visiting a sister this weekend. My way of being with relatives in the holiday season. She has a nice apartment. Better in many ways than my Mission Viejo place. It is very quiet and a big complex. About $2200 per month. I can rent a 3 bedroom house in a quiet part of MV for that. it is expensive up here. Complex’s workout facility is superb!

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 15:38:46

She could move across the San Rafael bridge to Richmond, where we used to live, and easily cut her monthly in half for similar digs.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 17:22:47

She said “no thanks. Lots of murders over there.”

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 19:10:05

You learn to ignore the murders, rapes, carjackings and drug crimes. I’m sure there is also the occasional innocent youth shot by racist police.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2014-12-13 21:52:37

I lived in that type of place in the late 70s and early 80s. Ain’t going back to those conditions.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 22:02:48

I lived in those kind of conditions in the late 80’s then again from mid-90s through early 2000s. And like you, I don’t plan to go back again. However it was a great way to save on housing expenses, as the risk of getting mugged or murdered tends to seriously suppress housing demand.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 12:53:49

I was strongly against our intervention in Libya. Hillary strongly backed it. The Islamists may block 300,000 barrels of production this weekend, the battle is being fought as I type this e-mail.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-13 13:08:40

post not e-mail brain cramp.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 13:14:36

“I was strongly against our intervention in Libya.”

And this is meaningful how?

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 16:43:45

2014 Army-Navy Game

Date: Saturday, Dec. 13

Time: 3 p.m. ET

Where: M&T Bank Stadium, Baltimore

TV: CBS

2024 DHS-NSA Game

Date: Saturday, Dec. 20

Time: 3 p.m. ET

Where: World Bank Stadium, Baltimore FEMA Region III

TV: CBS

 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 16:57:18

Looks like some people are thriving:

SANTA BARBARA, Calif., Dec. 8, 2014 /PRNewswire-iReach/ — Seacoast Yachts, the premier yacht sales company on the Central Coast, is thrilled to share that after experiencing a stellar year, they are opening an office at the Channel Islands Landing Marina in January 2015.

Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 17:19:10

I loved living in Santa Barbara back in the late 80’s to early 90’s, I can only imagine what a NIMBY progressive douche hatchery it’s become today.

#CentralCoastIsToast

Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 17:34:40

Still great, just more crowded with too many tourists and the East-side/west side gangs. Locals avoid DT on weekends.

NIMBY is what keeps it from being a rat race like The OC. The entire central coast is NIMBY and we like it that way!

Comment by reedalberger
2014-12-13 20:48:32

It is a beautiful area, I’ll give you that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2014-12-14 04:45:52

“It is a beautiful area…”

+1 Indeed.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 17:30:45

Coming out of a blackout in alley in the meat packing district with your pants around your ankles isn’t exactly thriving Lolacado.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 19:12:21

The Wealth Report
Flip That Yacht
Rich Buyers Sell Unfinished Boats, Reaping Millions in Profits
By Robert Frank
Updated May 25, 2007 12:01 a.m. ET

Terry Taylor, a Florida car dealer, has purchased five yachts since 2001. But don’t expect to see him anchoring off the coast of Cannes this week. Mr. Taylor is boatless, having sold all of his yachts to other buyers for huge profits.

“I wouldn’t feel too bad for Terry,” jokes Felix Sabates, a partner in Trinity Yachts of Gulfport, Miss., which built Mr. Taylor’s boats. “He’s probably made more money off those boats than we did.”

Mr. Taylor is part of a new breed of wealthy boat buyers: yacht flippers, who sell their costly purchases often without taking them on a single cruise.

With demand for large yachts far outstripping supply, the market for half-finished or recently completed boats is soaring. Some buyers are selling their boats months before they’re ready, for millions more than they agreed to pay. Others are auctioning off their slots on yacht-builder waiting lines.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-14 16:55:37

Thanks to the Fed, it’s good to be a bankster.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-13 17:07:46

It wouldn’t surprise me in the least to see politicized police and prosecutors try to railroad Tea Party members, just as the IRS illegally singled them out for targeting. What is the Establishment so afraid of?

http://nypost.com/2014/12/12/tea-party-mom-wins-1-12m-for-false-prosecution/

 
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-13 18:08:21

Everyone Must Check In

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-13 19:09:31

Casey Jones you better watch your speed…

Comment by real journalists
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-13 19:37:37

the Grateful Dead - Franklin’s Tower

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqQ-0n2I-4o

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-13 19:14:07

Now it came to pass in those days, there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be enrolled.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-13 20:17:12

Do you want me to read the card?

 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-13 20:07:03

Elizabeth Warren is a hero.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-13 21:37:48

Elizabeth Warren is a rich shill.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-13 21:42:53

Whose multi-billion dollar family trust does she represent and profit from?

Comment by rms
2014-12-14 04:48:20

“Whose multi-billion dollar family trust does she represent and profit from?”

Jesus is coming.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post