December 19, 2014

Bits Bucket for December 19, 2014

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

232 Comments »

Comment by Amy Hoax
2014-12-19 02:44:17

Living in a rental will never feel like a real home.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 05:22:11

The cardboard box you’ll soon be living in won’t either.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 07:40:12

Oh dear…

Queen Annes County, MD Sale Prices Sink 6% YoY; Plunge 8% QoQ And 2% MoM

http://www.zillow.com/queen-annes-county-md/home-values/

 
Comment by ibbots
2014-12-19 08:53:48

D-FW home values rise by almost $25 billion in 2014!

“Zillow said nationwide housing values have grown by an estimated $1.7 trillion this year – an increase of 6.7 percent.”

http://bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com/2014/12/d-fw-home-values-rise-by-almost-25-billion-in-2015.html/

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:59:36

…..and not a buyer in sight.

Housing Demand Falls To Record 20 Year Lows

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-17/mortgage-applications-tumble-citi-warns-oil-drop-risks-housingjobs-slump

A wise man recently stated, “I can ask $50k for my 15 year old Chevy truck but where is the buyer at that price?

So it is with housing…… so it is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-19 06:04:20

“Amy’s Fish Market”

Bahahahaha … this is a private joke between Amy and I and her customers.

Two of us are in on the joke and the third hasn’t a clue. I’ll let you decide who is who and which is which.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 07:30:39

Amy Hoak’s Home Economics Get email alerts

5 ways marijuana legalization affects real estate

By Amy Hoak

Published: Nov 25, 2014 9:20 a.m. ET

Little Feat - Don’t Bogart That Joint - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSgGCOHuO1U - 234k -

Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-19 07:37:22

“home economics” how quaint.

That’s what girls used to study in high school to prepare them for a career as a stay-at-home mom. Or who knows, maybe they’d dabble a little in real estate part time after the kids were all in school! It was one thing they could do without any additional education required LOL.

Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 10:47:17

And that lasted even until the mid-80’s, when home ec was relegated to junior high. At which point I decided to take shop.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 11:11:18

… and skipped math.

 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 11:50:09

Well, I did skip a year of math…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 07:32:36

A real home will feel like a prison when you are tens of thousands of dollars underwater.

Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 16:28:55

Not if you are smart.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 17:40:11

Thoughts of prison appeals to you Lolacado.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 08:46:22

Don’t call them millennials: Call them renters;

http://www2.realtoractioncenter.com/site/R?i=W_5eo1a2fnUudDeiCd27Mw

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 09:07:30

realtors are definitely liars

 
Comment by SUGuy
2014-12-19 09:26:13

This is waiting for the millennials

Cookie cutter, pressboard, Kmart quality, with high humidity basements ripe for mold growth and yes high taxes. Foreclosed homes keep coming on the market from this subdivision.

http://www.cnyhomes.com/Listing/Search/info.cgi?mlnum=S324200

Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 10:15:14

Near Syracuse…Go to downtown New York and the market is strong…Go out here and you still have waves of foreclosures…

The same is true here…Bay area is quite strong…Maybe I should use the word frothy…On the other hand, you can drive 60 miles, and find foreclosures or valuations that are 20 cents on the dollar for the same house…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 10:28:55

^ coming from a guy who hasn’t stepped foot in NY in his life.

Thanks Dave!

 
 
Comment by jane
2014-12-19 19:41:01

- complete with a .46 acre lot and $13K in taxes. I don’t know why that area doesn’t just completely empty out. Upstate NY does not puff up the base salary to compensate for taxes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 16:26:08

If you have a life it does. Who is home that much to care? I chose based on where my dollars are best assigned.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 05:36:47

When Comrade Pelosi’s Democrat Permanent Supermajority is installed, every “victim” including the ever-growing millions of “disabled” will be entitled to “fairness” in the form of involuntary wealth transfer from the productive.

Forward, Free Sh!t Army! Our glorious collectivist future on the globalist corporate-state plantation awaits!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11300793/EU-court-rules-that-fatness-can-constitute-a-disability.html

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 07:01:42

We posted a related article yesterday.

Why not just put down the fork and take the stairs?

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-19 07:30:49

Why not just put down the fork and take the stairs?

Because it seems overwhelming, particularly if you are very fat and have no history of successfully losing weight. It is hard, simple, but hard. And it is intimately tied to your personal psychology and lifestyle. It is not easy to lose 50-100+ pounds. It can be done pretty simply by cutting calories a bit and 1/2 hr a day of whatever gets your heart rate up.

Climbing that mountain is not easy. And keeping it up every day is not easy. But pretty much everyone can do it with the right mindset.

Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 11:52:56

Go Paleo. Good raw ingredients are expensive, and it’s time-consuming to cook and clean up everything yourself, but it’s worth it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 07:31:00

I didn’t know that EU courts had jurisdiction here. Also, aren’t most fat people located in red states?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 07:37:54

EU courts don’t have jurisdiction here (yet). But supranational busybodies and unelected bureaucrats using “fairness” or “it’s the right thing to do!” to quote Obama, are interjecting themselves into every aspect of our lives, unchecked (and in fact enabled by) the Republicrat Duopoly. It’s about power and control, not just entitlements and involuntary wealth transfer from the productive and responsible to the parasites.

Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 07:46:00

I think the most unproductive members of society are on Wall Street. They are not only unproductive, they are parasitical to the real economy. I would have no problem taxing these bloodsuckers to extinction to cut taxes for everyone else. But we all know thats not going to happen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 07:58:14

If you are one of the 95% of the brain-dead electorate who voted for crony-capitalist water carriers like Obama, McCain, or Romney, all you have to do to see the real problem is to look in the mirror. The Wall Street-Federal Reserve looting syndicate is robbing you blind, but like the docile little serfs that you are, you still continue to vote for the status quo.

 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 08:12:25

I’m not going to defend Obama’s record on Wall Street. He didn’t have to sign the blank check that congress gave to the banks, but he did. Clinton did the same thing. When it comes to giving money to the Wall Street money shufflers, democrats are no better than republicans.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 08:43:20

1500 bankers went to jail under W Bush…

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 09:02:16

“Shrub’s” Treasury and Fed officials - on loan from Goldman Sachs - gave Wall Street a blank check, while his DoJ failed to criminally prosecute a single banker. Obama left the same team substantially intact and continued with the same policies. Both Bush and Obama were and are crony capitalists through and through. So are Jeb and Hillary. That will not stop the sheeple from electing one or the other, even though they’re essentially the same candidate.

 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 09:06:38

From criminal charges that began in the Clinton years. It was W. and Greenspan who let the banks go hog wild. The collapse began at the end of W.’s reign, in case you forgot.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 09:12:14

Amazing how 6 years of obama with a super-majority of democrats in the house and a filibuster proof democrat senate could so nothing…

except pass obamacare.

From criminal charges that began in the Clinton years. It was W. and Greenspan who let the banks go hog wild. The collapse began at the end of W.’s reign, in case you forgot.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 11:06:22

Clinton let another Wall Street insider, Robert Rubin, bring crony capitalism to a whole new level. Clinton’s repeal of Glass-Steagal led directly to the 2008 financial crisis. Bill and Hillary Clinton have amassed a huge fortune since leaving “public service” - $300 million by some estimates - giving speeches at $300K each, which just happen to be attended almost exclusively by attendees who work at the financial firms that benefited from deregulation and other Clinton-era changes pushed by Rubin. The unbroken reign of crony capitalism goes back to at least Johnson, but it has become more brazen with each new Republicrat administration.

http://www.blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/09/09/citibank-will-anyone-hold-prince-and-rubin-accountable/

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2014-12-19 11:15:04

It was 2 years (they lost the first midterm to the GOP in the House), and they passed that abomination of legislation called Dodd Frank too.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 11:51:15

Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should be sharing a prison cell with Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner for their role in the housing bubble and 2008 financial crash.

 
Comment by rms
2014-12-19 13:03:30

“Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should be sharing a prison cell with Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner for their role in the housing bubble and 2008 financial crash.”

+1 Absolutely!

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-19 10:05:50

EU courts don’t have jurisdiction here (yet). But supranational busybodies and unelected bureaucrats using “fairness” or “it’s the right thing to do!” to quote

Given how American worker rights pale not only compared to the EU but even to lowly Mexico, I doubt this will happen. In Mexico workers get:

Mandatory paid time off (holidays and vacations)
Mandatory profit sharing (reparto de utilidades)
20 days pay year end bonus (aguinaldo)
Mandatory (and generous) severance pay if laid off. (I knew a guy, a white collar professional, who got 2 YEARS PAY when he was laid off)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 10:57:19

I’m assuming this is professional workers? Because if everyone got those benefits, why would they cross the border for “a better life?”

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 11:05:03

In some cases they probably cross the border because they can’t get any job in Mexico. A country like Mexico probably also has a lot of workers working in what’s called the informal economy in which the laws are not enforced. In America we call it working “off the books” where people get paid less than minimum wage, etc.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-19 12:30:44

Anyone who is full time gets those bennies. They come to El Norte because the pay is much better for menial labor, and we have welfare too, which is easily obtained with false IDs and anchor babies.

Those with professional, white collar jobs tend not to be illegals. Most illegals are the bottom of the barrel, many if not most are functionally illiterate.

 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:42:20

Where ever you find large numbers of minorities, you find high percentages of obese people, that can be in red states in the south. The ADA has covered morbid obesity for years in this area socialist Europe is just catching up with the US.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:47:10
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 07:49:22

You have clearly never visited the South.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:59:45

Yes, I have but you are clearly missing the point. Red means Republicans and they tend to be white as you clearly like to point out, and whites have less obesity than most minorities. Northern Asians would be a clear exception. Thus, red equates to less obesity not more obesity, but don’t let the facts get in your way.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:22:02

Excerpt from the CDC:

Among blacks in 45 states and DC with sufficient respondents, the prevalence of obesity ranged from 23.0% to 45.1%, with a total of 40 states having an obesity prevalence of ≥30%, including 5 states (Alabama, Maine, Mississippi, Ohio, and Oregon) with a prevalence of ≥ 40%.

Among Hispanics in 50 states and DC, the prevalence of obesity ranged from 21.0% to 36.7%, with 11 states having an obesity prevalence of ≥ 30%. Among whites in 50 states and DC, the prevalence of obesity ranged from 9.0% to 30.2%, with only one state (West Virginia) having a prevalence of ≥ 30%; 5 states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, and New Mexico and DC had an obesity prevalence of < 20%.

 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 08:37:30

But minorities are still a small portion of the population. White people in mostly red states make up the largest number of overweight people by far.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:43:25

No due the math, whites do not make up the largest number of fat people far. Together Hispanics and blacks make up close to 28% of the population. Asians and other minorities reduce the remaining percentage, and then you have certain categories such as black woman who are twice as likely to be obese. And among whites that vote for democrats they are far more likely to be fat and on welfare, sorry you are just wrong just Man up dman and admit it: Blue=obese.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 08:45:32

Haven’t you heard?

Asians are the new whites as they are more discriminated against in college acceptance/admissions than whites.

Also - we now have “white” hispanics…

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:45:56

Not by far if you bother to do the math. Just like 13% of the population can make up around 50% of the prison population, blacks are major overachievers on obesity. But I am sure it is due to racism. (not).

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 10:37:52

we now have “white” hispanics…

This term has been around for a long time. It’s been used by the Census Bureau for decades. There are white Hispanics and black Hispanics.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 10:39:01

whites that vote for democrats they are far more likely to be fat

How do you know this? Does the CDC have statistics based on voter registration?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 10:58:54

Poor people have a higher tendency to be fat and have a low IQ. Poor whites and super rich whites tend to vote for the Democratic party and exit polls at every election show it. If all whites voted Republican or even voted Republican in the same ratio as blacks voted Democratic, there would not be a Democratic senator.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 11:10:27

If you’re speculating like that, you should keep in mind that are a lot of poor whites in the South. Many of them, perhaps most of them, vote Republican.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:27:04

I am not speculating, I am following exit polls. The rich white Democrats, as a wise man on this board stated, use blacks to get their policies. But as the Sony e-mails and former Clipper’s owners show, they hold blacks in far more contempt than the average tea party member.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 12:54:18

Can you find an exit poll that specifically show how poor whites vote?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 15:40:30

Yes and so you can you if you take the time to look. Exit polls based on income and race are very common.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 15:51:47

Yes, I know that. There are breakdowns for income and other for race, but I haven’t seen one which focuses on poor whites, rich blacks, etc.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 16:17:25

Do not have time for an extensive search but Obama by promoting abortion and gay rights aggressively has lost additional numbers of religious poor but still poor whites are in the democratic camp:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002471039

 
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 17:00:19

So this guy said that 51% of poor whites voted Democrat. But that’s for the country as a whole. There may be no way to verify it, but it seems likely that the residents of Southern states and other red states are more likely to vote Republican than those in blue states.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 08:20:32

Well, it appears that baby boomers, maybe some that are obese are coming your way Adan…Your #1…

The top markets positioned to see an influx of baby boomer homebuyers are (listed alphabetically):

Albuquerque, New Mexico
Boise, Idaho
Denver
Fort Myers, Florida
Greenville, South Carolina
Orlando, Florida
Phoenix
Raleigh, North Carolina
Sarasota, Florida
Tucson, Arizona

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:28:00

I know people are coming they are buying in my neighborhood, but they do not seem to be obese. Many are coming due to the outdoor activities available and they are certainly not obese.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:29:31

Still pimping that 20 year old expired REIC lie eh?

Bulletin: The boomer infatuation already happened and it drove housing demand and prices from 1996-2006. It’s over and it’s not coming back. What is coming is 35 million excess empty houses flooding the market as boomers expire. In fact it’s already begun.

Demographics Dave…. Demographics.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:29:34

(California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, and New Mexico and DC had an obesity prevalence of < 20%. From the CDC excerpt from above.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:38:07

That is for whites.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:53:30

Well, it appears that baby boomers, maybe some that are obese are coming your way Adan…Your #1…

BTW, sdave, the list looks alphabetical to me and not ranked.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 09:22:22

Yes it is….Thought you may not catch it…: >)…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 08:55:39

OINK!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 09:01:17

too many donuts.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 09:26:32

Bill, palladium is over $800 again and oil has regained all of yesterday’s fall but they are spiking the dollar again trying to contain them. They will kill the multinationals’ profits and make domestic production hard to sell but Obama wants to beat Putin despite Putin having 30 IQ points on him.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:56:55

They will kill the multinationals’ profits and make domestic production hard to sell but Obama wants to beat Putin despite Putin having 30 IQ points on him.

BTW, that is a very conservative estimate about the difference in IQs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-19 10:06:54

Q: How do you know when a cop has fallen asleep?

A: The doughnut falls out of his hand.

Comment by rms
2014-12-19 13:05:32

:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 06:03:07

“patient”

 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 06:03:13

Talked to a new co-worker this week. Single, early 30’s. He recently toyed about with buying a house — even got a Realtor and looked at a few. Then he realized his heart wasn’t in it and that he doesn’t really want to take care of a structure or yard. He has little interest in DIY or hiring contractors. (Around here, any SFH within a decent commute is at least 30-40 years old and needs rehab of some sort.)

He already knows enough not to buy a condo, but I piled on that condo fees go up like rent does, and 2-bed floating boxes of air are harder to sell than 3-bed SFHs with yard.

Instead, he signed a lease for a one-bed apartment.
Advantage: he’s in an older high-rise, so his utilities and internet are included.
Advantage: he’s on a Metro stop.
Disadvantage: monthly rent on his 1/1 is only $150/month less than the PITI on my 3/2. It’s a good rate for this area, but he’s not saving much versus paying PITI. His real advantage is in saving on utilities, internet, and maintenance.
Disadvantage: he got that good rate by signing an 18-month lease with a no-break clause. So he has no mobility, but he doesn’t seem to need to it.

In my view, for his age, it’s a wash. I told him: good job dude, don’t buy if your only reason is for the checking account. Plenty of time to buy later if you want to. (FWIW, years ago when I was his age, I didn’t want to take care of a house either, and made the same decision not to buy.)

The fun part — while we were talking about this, he got a bug-bug call from his (former) realtor. They won’t leave him alone. I told him that realtors are really hurting for end consumers, since they didn’t make a commission on all those bubblet investor cash buys.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-19 06:22:21

Maryland suburbs see a housing slowdown

The chart at the bottom is more revealing.

Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 06:26:46

“considerable time”

 
Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 06:40:09

Thanks for the chart, Ben. The data is really not that surprising. Inventory up in Frederick County… McMansion central of Maryland. Yes, I suppose they ran out of households willing to make the 60-90 minute commute just to get to the Beltway, much less inside.

In Prince George’s Country, inventory went down 30% and prices rose 9%. Prince George’s was always seen as the “poor” county with the over-extenders and the bigger bubble pop. Flushing out foreclosures and snapping up inventory to rent… makes sense.

Montgomery… Inventory up 6%, not much change.

For all of them: days on market 42-55. I don’t know how that compares. It seems rather short, but maybe sellers are just more aggressive about dropping prices.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2014-12-19 06:39:17

“… he got a bug-bug call from his (former) realtor. They won’t leave him alone.”

Amy says when she goes fishing she doesn’t expect to catch all the fish, just the stupid ones, the ones that will fall for her lines (Bahahaha … “fall for her lines”. Fishing? Lines? Get it? Ain’t I clever?).

“They won’t leave her alone” because the cost to them of throwing them a line (there it is again, my cleverness) is but a phone call and a minute or two of time. Amy’s time and the fish’s time.

Bahahahaha … one of the two, Amy or the fish, may just profit from this minute or two, and will leave it to you HBB schmucks to decide just which one it may be.

And while you are considering just who it will be who will profit from this transaction - if there is to be a transaction - be sure to add in whomever it is that will ultimately supply the money to the fish so as to get itself hooked. Is it Amy? No, it is not Amy; Amy gets a one shot hit … and she does all the work. Bahahahaha …

So, ask yourself this question: Is there someone in the deal that gets to make a profit from the deal month-after-month, year-after-year for .. for possibly many decades? Any one at all?

Comment by joesixpack
2014-12-19 07:57:23

I will …. bite…..

The fish does not get hooked because he is dumb, the fish is not smart enough to be dumb. He is just doing what fish do. The so called “smart” fish, are just fish that were previously hooked and managed to escape. They don’t know what happened to them, but they now are more careful about what they eat, and avoid unusual looking meals, or maybe they smell the food first, I don’t know, but they have no way to communicate this insight on to other fish because they can only move their mouths open and close. They pitifully appear to look as though they are trying to say something, but just can’t get it out. And even if they could, it is easy to see that they don’t have ears.

I hope that clears everyhing up.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2014-12-19 08:33:20

All these years, and now I’ll never again see fish in quite the same way. Poetry in blogging.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:38:26

Ugly truth right there. Write and post more.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 07:35:37

“His real advantage is in saving on utilities, internet, and maintenance.”

So was yours but tens of thousands of dollars in losses later you still can’t bring yourself to admit it.

Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 07:58:39

Its hard to breathe underwater.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-19 08:11:25

“he doesn’t really want to take care of a structure or yard…”

Translation: He became nauseous at the prospect of writing a big check for the downpayment and agreeing to 30 years of follow on payments and significant deferred maintenance requirements, having s vague feeling that the price was too high for a decrepit shack.

Comment by redmondjp
2014-12-19 23:44:47

No need to be snide.

As the 15-year-owner of a 1977 crapshack, you really have no idea how much of your life is going to be sucked up by trying to keep nature from reclaiming your home. Did you know that a Northern Flicker can drill a 3″ diameter hole through 1″ thick fine-grained cedar siding boards in just a few hours?

I admire the guy’s honesty. You only live once - many of my coworkers choose to enjoy the outdoors over treating their crawlspace for insects . . .

There are positive aspects in each case - for me, I’ll ‘own’ my house in a few years (translation: be allowed to ‘rent’ it from the county for the rest of my life until the ever-increasing property taxes force me to move), woo hoo!

 
 
Comment by rms
2014-12-19 08:47:07

“His real advantage is in saving on utilities, internet, and maintenance.”

His real advantage is having a lease rather than a mortgage, so he won’t have to rely on Suzanne when he decides to move.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 09:29:44

and 2-bed floating boxes of air are harder to sell than 3-bed SFHs with yard ??

I disagree…As always, its about location, but the demographics and changing attitudes about purchasing & maintaining a single family home are changing…If you are willing to live in a long term rental apartment, why would you not explore purchasing of a condo…Ran properly, you get excellent economies of scale on many expenses in a condo visa-v a single family home…

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 10:33:07

Dave,

Our costs to construct don’t change based on “location”.

Remember…. “location location location” is an old realtor marketing technique to get you, their target, to pay far more than the house is worth.

 
Comment by Bluto
2014-12-19 14:46:32

I owned a SFH for 10 years, very much enjoyed owning my own place and may do it again after Bubble 2.0 pops…but am not interested in condos at any price, have heard waay too many horror stories about fascist HOA boards, lawsuits, other tenants who quit paying dues, etc. In addition if the percentage of renter occupied units goes over 50% it can be very difficult to finance a sale and the value of units goes off a cliff.
I signed my life away for a house and it was worth it to me but no way I would do that for a condo…

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 06:24:06

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2014/12/15/pigmen-win-again/

“The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they’re an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They’ve got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying ­ lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.” - George Carlin.

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-19 06:44:06

Pretty much. And it is right out in the open for all to see. Here is a very important life truth: people will believe what they want to beleive, regardless of the facts or the truth.

Comment by Bluto
2014-12-19 22:44:01

yep, very true, and even more so if someones livelihood is connected to a belief…per Upton Sinclair

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”

 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 06:52:57

“when stocks can stay up on their own “

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 06:56:48

The Big Winner in the Rental Home Shortage: Wall Street

By John Gittelsohn and Heather Perlberg
Dec 19, 2014 12:01 AM ET

Corporate landlords are benefiting from the worst U.S. rental-housing shortage in more than a decade as construction trails demand and more Americans opt to lease rather than buy.

There’s an undersupply of single-family houses and apartments to rent for the first time since 2001, according to an analysis by Frank Nothaft, chief economist at mortgage buyer Freddie Mac, based on available inventory and historic vacancy rates. The deficit in the third quarter was about 350,000, the most in records dating back 14 years.

The shortage is giving the upper hand to institutional investors who spent more than $25 billion since 2012 buying single-family homes to rent. While the market for apartments has been in favor of landlords for five years, owners of houses are now able to increase rents and reduce turnover to boost profits.

http://www.bloomberg.com/…/rental-housing-shortage-gives-boon-to-corporate-landlords.html - 138k -

Comment by oxide
2014-12-19 07:28:45

More fun facts from the article:

————
The U.S. rental-vacancy rate fell to 7.4 percent in the third quarter… The market is considered balanced, at 8.2 percent.

Rents have been rising faster than inflation.

Rents on all single-family homes and multifamily units are expected to climb 3.5 percent next year, compared with a 2.5 percent increase for home purchase prices.

Phoenix: 3-bed rent up 9% to $1,158.
Las Vegas: rents up 3% to $1,248.
Orlando: rents up 5$ to $1,294.

“They’re not producing many entry-level homes.” [actually, they haven't produced many entry SFH in the past 30 years.]

Blackstone’s Invitation Homes: raised rents 1.8% to $1474.
American Homes 4 rent: raised rents 3% renewal, 4% new tenants.
American Residential Properties: raised rents 3.4% renewals
Silver Bay: raised rents 3% on renewals.
———-

All of these are national trends. My guess is rents are flat in rural areas and skyrocketing in major cities with jobs. (Austin Denver DC San Fran…)

Comment by Shillow
2014-12-19 07:38:31

There’s plenty of rental inventory. Tons. This is just backward looking propaganda for those who want to beleive their house is not cratering.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 07:42:10

Rent and Shack prices out of whack too high in my section of Region IV

It’s a shame as I just watched another mid 20’s young couple with a kid sign up for a 30 year loan on a SFH for about $80k - $90k more than it’s worth.

Comment by Puggs
2014-12-19 10:13:20

Donkey’s gonna donk.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 07:42:39

Donk….. boasting about a 7.5% vacancy rate when the long term trend is somewhere around 2-3% doesn’t sound like someone who knows how to do math.

Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-19 07:49:00

Meanwhile, I’m connecting the dots and showing where this is really going in the desk clearing post. Eventually, someone will ask, “who here ever saw the institutional investors leaving the market?” Try getting out of the bits bucket once in a while and see what this blog is really about.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 07:59:24

+1

 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 08:28:29

It was my understanding that the institutional investors were buying for the long term, but they are already selling their inventory. Were they buying houses to rent out, or are they really just corporate flippers?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-19 08:45:06

Read the desk clearing post today. And from the comments section to yesterdays post, where I found this:

”Auction.com, LLC, the nation’s leading online real estate marketplace, today announced the findings from its November Real Estate Investor Activity Report™, a nationwide survey of real estate investors bidding on properties offered for auction during the month. This research provides insight into real estate investment trends on both a national and regional level. Survey data collected from investors bidding on property online and at live events across the country reveals that buying property to hold and rent is currently favored over flipping nationwide, although investor intent varies considerably by vehicle (online or live event) and investor profile.’

‘Flipping was also the more popular strategy among investors purchasing multiple properties per year – particularly institutional investors (those indicating that they purchase 50 or more properties per year). This was true for both online auctions and live events.’

http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=9e5649e9744d874916bb930fe&id=9536ccc9fa&e=5931759b0e

According to these guys, most of the institutional buys are for flips. Now why hasn’t the media picked up on this? And why are people on my blog arguing about climate change and not seeing what the heck is going on in the housing market?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:47:23

hmmmm….

“Shockingly, D.C.’s Median Rent is Lower Than it was in 2013″

http://dc.curbed.com/tags/falling-rental-prices

And Manhattans is lower and Bostons is lower, etc. etc.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:49:08

Answer: Moderate it and be done with the problem.

 
Comment by rms
2014-12-19 08:58:40

The institutional investors are your public retirement funds and annuity insurance companies, and they are usually left holding the bag because the hedge funds typically reach the exits first.

 
Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 09:17:19

Hundreds of thousands of new homes quietly being put on the market. Better buy now before prices start plummeting. Nothing increases the value of a house like overpaying for it.

 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 10:24:54

and skyrocketing in major cities with jobs. (Austin Denver DC San Fran…) ??

Only can speak for San Francisco and they are through the roof…SF around here is the “go-to” place for newly minted college grads…They are flocking to SF…Easy to get a job and they just bunk-up (just like college) so they can afford the rent…They don’t mind.. They are never home…Sleep & Shower is the only time they are there…

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 10:31:36

Has Apple announced their first wave of layoffs yet?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-19 12:27:13

The whiz kidz don’t want to work for Corporate America, they want to work at start ups because if they’re lucky they’ll get stinking rich.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 12:30:04

Has Microsoft announced it’s third wave of layoffs yet?

 
Comment by Puggs
2014-12-19 12:59:27

Walking papers for a walkscore generation.

Watz yer walkscore??

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 13:26:21

The whiz kidz don’t want to work for Corporate America, they want to work at start ups because if they’re lucky they’ll get stinking rich ??

I think they want to work along side other young people and party their ass off…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2014-12-19 11:15:16

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 06:56:48

The Big Winner in the Rental Home Shortage: Wall Street
bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-19/rental-housing-shortage-gives-boon-to-corporate-landlords.html

 
Comment by Cactus
2014-12-19 11:59:41

owners of houses are now able to increase rents and reduce turnover to boost profits.”

that should cause inflation numbers to go up “owners equivalent rent”

but inflation stays really low.. these inflation numbers are fishy- medical goes up , taxes go up, college costs go up now rents go up

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2014-12-19 07:07:58

How about that stock market? It must be year-end bonus season on Wall Street.

Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 07:23:47

Doesnt it seem we get these massive short covering rallies at the most opportune times?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:14:34

Everything is manipulated, and it is fiat currency which allows for this manipulation. But it is a house of cards, you never know when the house will fall but you want to be in hard assets when it does.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 07:12:32

The Feeding Begins: Foreign Bankers Descend on Ukraine

December 18, 2014 (F. William Engdahl - NEO) -

If it were not for the fact that the lives of some 45 million people are at stake, Ukrainian national politics could be laughed off as a very sick joke. Any pretenses that the October national elections would bring a semblance of genuine democracy of the sort thousands of ordinary Ukrainians demonstrated for on Maidan Square just one year ago vanished with the announcement by Victoria Nuland’s darling Prime Minister, “Yat” Yatsenyuk, of his new cabinet.

The US-picked Ukraine President, billionaire oligarch Petro Poroshenko called “snap” elections at the end of August for October 26. He did so to make sure genuine opposition to his regime of murderers, gangsters and in some cases outright Nazis would be able to push an unprepared genuine opposition out of the Verkhovna Rada or Parliament. Because the parliament had significant opposition parties to the US-engineered February 22 coup d’etat, they had blocked many key pieces of legislation that the Western vultures were demanding, from changing key land ownership laws to privatization of precious state assets. By law, the old parliament would have sat until its five year term ended in October, 2017. That was clearly too long for State Department neo-con Ukraine puppet-mistress Victoria Nuland and her backers in Washington.

Now, with a new parliament that is controlled by the Petro Poroshenko bloc as largest party and the boyish-looking former Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who is also new Prime Minister as head of the second largest party, the way was clear to get on with the rape of Ukraine. What shocked some is the blatant foreign takeover that followed, like a Wall Street vulture fund raid on a distressed debtor country of the Third World.

landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-feeding-begins-foreign-bankers.html - 130k -

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 08:49:53

Who needs a congress?

Just use an obama executive memo

they had blocked many key pieces of legislation that the Western vultures were demanding, from changing key land ownership laws to privatization of precious state assets.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 09:04:59

Just don’t confuse those “memos” with Executive Orders or rule by decree.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-18/united-states-newspeak-–-obama-spins-executive-orders-presidential-memoranda-avoid-s

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 09:16:48

They are all the same abuse of power.

Can’t wait for a Dick Cheney to do the same to democrats. Also no filibuster in the senate.

The democrats have showed us the way.

Plus we can blame any failures for at least 6 years on the previous administration.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 07:23:15

Climate change: Beavers boost emissions with 800 million kg of methane every year

By Hannah Osborne
December 16, 2014 17:08 GMT

More research on the Beaver (1957–1963)

[June has prepared a lovely dinner of barbecued pork ribs]

Ward Cleaver: Well, you boys are very quiet tonight. What are you thinking about?

Theodore “Beaver” Cleaver: I was just thinkin’ what I’d do if I was a pig eatin’ peoples ribs.

June Cleaver: Beaver, please.

Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 07:41:21

I wonder how much human flatulents contribute to climate change? fart tax?

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 10:14:37

“I wonder how much human flatulents contribute to climate change? fart tax?”

Funny you should mention that because according to James A DeHart alligator farts are causing global warming.

Climate change: Beavers boost emissions with 800 million kg of methane every year

By Hannah Osborne
December 16, 2014 17:08 GMT

Beavers are contributing to climate change, adding an estimated 800 million kg of methane to the atmosphere every year, scientists have found.

comment

James A DeHart 2 days ago

Everyone knows it is alligator farts causing global warming; anyone visiting the swamps in Florida or on the Gulf Coast know it is the alligators.

Climate change: Beavers boost emissions with 800 million kg of …
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/…avers-boost-emissions-800-million-kg-methane-every-year-1479809 - 134k - Cached - Similar pages
2 days ago

 
Comment by joesixpack
2014-12-19 20:27:57

Would be funny if not true.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/epas-air-pollution-target-flatulent-cows/

“Cows in Montgomery, Ala. The Environmental Protection Agency is considering a plan to charge a fee for air-polluting cows and hogs. The proposal was one of several drafted after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling found that greenhouse gases the animals emit through flatulence or belching amounts to air pollution. It would require farms or ranches with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to pay an annual fee of about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and $20 for each hog. AP PHOTO/DAVE MARTIN”

I am sure humans are not too far “behind” in this quest to impound tax revenue from this new found source of gas.

I know that some people are more harmful to the environment than others with respect to these types of emissions. How do we fairly charge each individual based on their emission release. I think that a device that could measure this so as to fairly apply the tax would be difficult to design, and even more difficult to install.

 
 
Comment by Overbanked
2014-12-19 07:57:52

No one gets tired of beaver.

Comment by Underbeavered
2014-12-19 08:00:53

You can say that again.

Comment by Beaver Squeezer
2014-12-19 21:53:13

Hands off my beaver!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 08:24:56

Climate change: Beavers boost emissions with 800 million kg of methane every year

By Hannah Osborne
December 16, 2014 17:08 GMT

More research on the Beaver (1957–1963)

[Entry in Beaver's diary]

Theodore “Beaver” Cleaver: Went to school. Ate lunch. Saw dead cat. Came home.

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2014-12-19 07:44:12

‘Wikileaks on Thursday has made public a never-before-seen internal review conducted by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency that looked at the agency’s drone and targeted assassination programs in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and elsewhere.’

‘The agency’s own analysis, conducted in 2009, found that its clandestine drone and assassination program was likely to produce counterproductive outcomes, including strengthening the very “extremist groups” it was allegedly designed to destroy.’

‘”The potential negative effect of HLT operations,” the report states, “include increasing the level of insurgent support […], strengthening an armed group’s bonds with the population, radicalizing an insurgent group’s remaining leaders, creating a vacuum into which more radical groups can enter, and escalating or de-escalating a conflict in ways that favor the insurgents.”

‘Wikileaks points out that this internal prediction “has been proven right” in the years since the internal review was conducted near the outset of President Obama’s first term. And despite those internal warnings—which have been loudly shared by human rights and foreign policy experts critical of the CIA’s drone and assassination programs—Wikileaks also notes that after the internal review was prepared, “US drone strike killings rose to an all-time high.”

‘Reached by the Washington Post on Thursday for response, CIA spokesperson Kali J. Caldwell said the agency would not comment “on the authenticity or content of purported stolen intelligence documents.”

Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 08:52:23

“I’m really good at killing people”
– Nobel Peace Prize President obama

Comment by rms
2014-12-19 09:05:04

“I’m really good at killing people”

+1 He can also park their cars.

 
Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 10:32:16

I’m really good at killing people”
– Nobel Peace Prize President obama ??

Possibly….Maybe…But he is ‘Minor league” compared to Bush…

Comment by Jingle Male
2014-12-21 03:56:36

Obama was not even bush league compared to “dub”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:44:23

The WTO finds that the US is cheating on trade with China, we are imposing illegal tariffs. That is why we would have major problems with trying to impose a tariff on oil.

http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2014-12/19/content_19121063.htm

Comment by Dman
2014-12-19 08:46:15

But of course, China manipulating its currency is just fine. Without a weak yuan, China can’t compete, but it doesn’t really matter, because the whole house of cards is crumbling as we speak.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:57:49

China’s currency is one of the few that has appreciated as much as the dollar this year. I do not consider an economy which is still growing at around 7% per year and in which workers are getting 10% raises to be crumbling. If you want to see what a crumbling economy looks like, check out Brazil.

Comment by scdave
2014-12-19 10:33:41

check out Brazil ??

Or Venezuela….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 07:45:02

hey bartendar, can u pour me up a cosby for my friend.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:48:53

Don’t go out drinking with Rio.

 
Comment by rms
2014-12-19 09:08:43

Who scored more Hollywood hopefuls, Bill Cosby or Desi Arnaz?

Comment by rms
2014-12-19 09:30:21

And neglecting permutations there’s Bob Crane. :)

 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 07:54:08

BTW, I posted the growth in NG in China yesterday, here are the numbers for wind. Solar is showing similar growth. Many on this board want to blame the drop in coal use solely on a reduced rate of economic growth, but that is a small part of what is going on. China is moving away from coal for many reasons, environmental, wanting to reduce imports, the fact that China is rapidly running out of coal. That is another reason why Obama’s “deal” with China was such a joke. We agree to forfeit all the advantages of our abundant resources and they agree to do what they are already doing:

http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2014-10/22/content_18786120.htm

Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-19 08:20:04

Backwards. Solar and wind are vanity projects. Coal price did not collapse because China is running out, it collapsed because steel demand collapsed because construction collapsed. The elephant is credit expansion, which changed phase a year ago.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:25:16

Coal price did not collapse because China is running out, it collapsed because steel demand collapsed because construction collapsed.

China mines 4 billion tons of coal per year, it has about 110 billion tons of coal reserves, do the math. The US, in contrast, has hundreds of years of reserves at our production levels of about one billion tons per year.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 10:02:30

Meanwhile China is locking up oil from our traditional sources due to Obama’s economic war on Russia, from today’s China Daily, an excerpt:

The global slide in oil prices may push Venezuela into default and the Latin American country may turn to China for even more financial help, according to observers.

For the first time in five years since the depth of the global recession in 2009, oil prices crashed through the $60-a-barrel mark last week. Crude supplies from the US shale boom and the reluctance of oil-producing nations to trim output along with weak demand have cut oil prices by almost 50 percent from last summer.

“Oil exports account for more than 95 percent of Venezuela’s export earnings and account for an enormous portion of the national government’s budget. The collapse in oil prices constitutes an enormous challenge for the government,” Patrick Duddy, a former US ambassador to Venezuela (2007-2010) and director of the Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, wrote in an e-mail.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-19 10:45:39

The biggest expansion of credit in history brought the world here to the edge of the cliff, and your beloved China Miracle is over the edge. You’ve been warned here for many months to get your money out.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:23:13

I have no money directly in China. Like anyone of this board who owns shares in any major company, I have money indirectly in China but that is it.

 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 17:07:49

“The biggest expansion of credit in history brought the world here to the edge of the cliff, and your beloved China Miracle is over the edge. You’ve been warned here for many months to get your money out.”

Well, we have been warned since HBB went live. I started reading in 2003.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 19:13:43

That’s interesting considering this blog was established this month in 2004.

Lay off the sauce Lolacado.

 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 15:38:14

Almost 20,000 megawatts of wind added in one year is not vanity.

Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-19 17:06:16

Of course it is. It has a negative return and destroys the landscape. These are the projects of government subsidy and vanity. You are cheerleading waste. If you don’t have an investment in it, it is a wonder, incredible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by redmondjp
2014-12-19 23:53:13

Dan,

When you can make wind into baseload generation, get back to me.

Without storage, windpower actually increases the instability of our electrical grid. And it kills countless raptors every year (good friend spend years working on a wind farm - I have all the inside info and it isn’t pretty - without incentives, the whole thing would have never happened, just like Wind 1.0 back in the 1970s).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Overbanked
2014-12-19 07:55:24

Comment by Rental Watch
2014-12-18 06:08:46

This is what is causing the “disaster”: “Inventory still lags demand in many markets,”

Not enough homes are on the market, which is driving prices higher.
………………………………………………………………………..

I don’t understand this comment.

I learned in high school economics that there is a difference between “increase in demand” and “increase in quantity demanded.”

When workers descend on, say, North Dakota, is that an increase in demand? Does it matter that they moved from Florida?

When 100,000 new immigrants move to California next year, is that an increase in demand?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 08:02:57

When 100,000 new immigrants move to California next year, is that an increase in demand?

With ten moving into a one bedroom rental, it is a minor increase in rental demand. Of course, since they will cause 90,000 more productive people to move out, they will probably cause a drop in SFH demand.

 
Comment by Underbeavered
2014-12-19 09:55:42

If two people living in a one-bedroom apartment want to move to a two-bedroom apartment, is that an increase in demand?

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2014-12-19 11:27:34

Because you can’t easily move homes around the country like other goods, then yes, flow of people matter.

“When workers descend on, say, North Dakota, is that an increase in demand? Does it matter that they moved from Florida?”

When you are talking about the North Dakota housing market, yes, it is an increase in demand in that market.

And when you are talking about an increase of 100,000 people in California, yes, that is an increase in demand.

Why do I say this?

Absent an increase in available shelter, all else equal, with this influx of people, the cost of shelter will rise. If people double-up, it simply allows them to pay more to be able to rent a diminishing number of available units.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 11:40:11

With 25 million excess empty and defaulted houses in the US, 4.4 million of which are in CA, falling rental rates, rising vacancies, you better have more than a 100,000 poor asian refugees on the demand side.

Comment by Rental Watch
2014-12-19 12:02:15

Something doesn’t match with your world view from the article above:

“The Big Winner in the Rental Home Shortage: Wall Street

By John Gittelsohn and Heather Perlberg
Dec 19, 2014 12:01 AM ET”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 12:31:14

Something doesn’t match your wallet Rental_Fraud.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by real journalists
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 08:38:38

Climate change: Beavers boost emissions with 800 million kg of methane every year

By Hannah Osborne
December 16, 2014 17:08 GMT

More research on the Beaver (1957–1963)

Ward Cleaver: Beaver, your mother and I are very disappointed in you.

Comment by Underbeavered
2014-12-19 10:32:06

Is Hannah Osborne advocating that we have the beaver shot?

Comment by Blue Skye
2014-12-19 10:52:18

Probably not. The beavers do not produce the Methane, their ponds do. Shoot the ponds, like everyone in the valleys used to do to keep their land from being flooded. Aeration changes the methane generation to CO2 generation. Idiots.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by redmondjp
2014-12-19 23:55:20

When we were kids, we called it ’swamp gas.’

And now, our local governments spend millions of dollars per year recreating these ‘natural’ swamps!!! The stupidity is staggering.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 08:57:54

Warmists gonna warm, Dannyboy, warmists gonna warm

Comment by Underbeavered
2014-12-19 09:46:10

Beavers gonna beave, yo.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 08:31:28

Lead follow or get out of the way. It’s good to see a few starting to grasp it.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 08:43:56

I am working on a Climate change documentary in hopes of getting a federal grant for more research.

So far all I have is the intro.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQkG6yEYxx4 - 199k -

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 08:49:31

Warmists gonna warm

Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 08:56:42

Do you like the way we have introduced our green energy hedge trimmer and lawnmower right at the top of our documentary before we get into the meat and potatoes of the 800 million kg of methane created by Beavers every year.

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 09:08:21

Palm Beach County gonna warm

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 09:29:34

“Palm Beach County gonna warm”

True Dat

We ain’t got no Beavers with push mowers but we do have thousands of Dreamers riding around in Landscape trucks with enough gas powered lawn equipment to keep the entire state of Rhode Island well trimmed every week.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 09:10:17

Do bigger beavers create more methane than smaller beavers?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 09:16:58

Do we have an obese beaver problem in this country?

 
Comment by Underbeavered
2014-12-19 09:52:03

How much methane is in a beaver queef?

 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 08:54:36

Conclusion:

Only bigger and bigger government with more and more regulations and higher and higher taxes can save us.

Comment by real journalists
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 09:10:21

You forgot the part about starving the kids and throwing grandma into the street…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 09:35:24

Teabaggers gonna bag:

http://trucknutz.com/

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 09:22:58

“Teabaggers gonna bag:”

I know right, just ask the president whose wife thinks it’s racist when a short white lady asks her to get something off the top shelf that she can’t reach.

by Breitbart News
28 Nov 2013

President Barack Obama used the sexually vulgar expression “tea-baggers” to refer to tea party members in a letter he wrote to a Texas grade school teacher. The term “tea-baggers” has been used to ridicule the tea party, a group of American activists who advocate reducing taxes, shrinking the size of government, and returning to traditional family values. Obama was replying to a letter he received from Thomas Ritter, a 5th grade school teacher from Irving, Texas.

In his letter to the President, Ritter expressed deep concern that the Affordable Care Act was a law that “caused such a ­divisive, derisive and toxic environment.” Ritter said that he wrote to the President with great trepidation because he feared “retribution.” He asserted, “The reality is that any citizen that disagrees with your administration is targeted and ridiculed.” Moreover, Ritter begged the President to, “Do the right thing not the political thing. Suggest a bill that Americans can support.”

Ritter went on to accuse the President of making fun of “tea-baggers” and blamed White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for ridiculing Sarah Palin, noting that it was “beneath the dignity of the White House” to engage in this kind of political targeting. Obama defended himself, writing,

“I… appreciate your concern about the toxic political environment right now. I do have to challenge you, though, on the notion that any citizen that disagrees with me has been ‘targeted and ridiculed’ or that I have ‘made fun’ of tea-baggers.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 10:31:26

I have a short video starring Downlow Joe and Lola demonstrating what teabagging is, but children read this blog so it is not appropriate to post here.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 10:48:07

I didn’t know Teabagger had any other meaning than pretty much a racial slur until I looked that cr@p up.

Now I don’t know whether that makes it better or worse.

Oh well, I don’t much care either way, sticks and stones and baseball bats will break my bones but words will never hurt me.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 09:05:11

As I said yesterday, with the WTI contract expiring today volatility was to be expected. We are now up over $2 a barrel which is more than we fell yesterday.

 
Comment by 2banana
2014-12-19 09:20:32

It is all OK as unions are the all time top political money contributors and give 99% to democrats.

What is a little sabotage, violence and extortion when it is for the children…?

—————————-

Union Leaders Plead Guilty to Arson, Violence and Extortion
Breitbart | 12/19/2014 | DJ Biers

Three more members of Ironworkers Local 401 in Philadelphia pleaded guilty Tuesday to charges of conspiracy, extortion, and racketeering in an ongoing RICO case against the labor union. They join eight others who have pleaded guilty in recent months to charges related to arson, sabotage, and violent intimidation of contractors who used non-union labor.

The union’s business agents would visit foremen and threaten them with assault and sabotage if they did not agree to hire 401 members, prosecutors claim, although often such workers “often performed little or no actual work” and were paid “merely to prevent further acts of sabotage.” If the foreman did not concede, union members would use a series of tactics, from picketing to physically barring workers and materials from entering the site, to increase the pressure. If this did not work, things would escalate to violence and vandalism: “actions included assaulting non-union employees with baseball bats, slashing the tires of vehicles, smashing vehicles with crow bars, cutting and changing the locks on construction sites, filling the locks with superglue, damaging construction equipment, [and] stealing construction materials.”

If the contractors still resisted, more severe sabotage – what members referred to as “night work” – is alleged to have followed, including setting fire to the site, destroying machinery, and “using an acetylene torch … to cut through the steel support columns of the building.”

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 10:36:31

At 11.3% of the U.S. workforce (down from 35% in 1954) those union goons are gonna take over ANY DAY NOW!

Be afraid, be very afraid…

And keep your goddamn government hands off my crop subsidy!

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:01:26

And keep your goddamn government hands off my crop subsidy!

And beavers, we are talking to you Bill Clinton, we saw the pictures.

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 11:54:50

you are at 31 out of 166 posts so far here today as of just before noon local time.

sometimes they were just called the wings, and sometimes they were paul mccartney and the wings.

ben jones needs to rename this blog from the housing bubble blog to dannyboy and the housing bubble blog.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 12:01:30

Wings covered in Cheetos sauce?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 15:35:13

I needed to get my posts in before I left for a while. You always have the choice of not reading. I cannot add up your posts because I don’t know all your board names. But post as many as you want, as long as they are informative or amusing.

 
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 17:22:47

That is Ben Jones’ decision, not yours.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Puggs
2014-12-19 10:12:13

Your New Years resolution for 2015: Get out of debt ASAP!

Comment by rms
2014-12-19 13:11:03

Yep, been there three years now.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 10:28:35

Interesting information from oil and gas journal which confirms my cost estimates and the fact that these oil prices will not last long:

12/12/2014
Rachael Seeley, Editor

Bakken shale production set another record in August, but weakening crude prices and flaring reduction efforts threatened to temper production growth.

The state produced 1.13 million b/d of oil and 1.3 bcfd of gas during the month, yielding a production growth rate of 2%. The growth rate was 4% in August 2012 and August 2013, said Lynn Helms, director of North Dakota Mineral Resources.

Helms addressed a monthly webinar hosted by the North Dakota Industrial Commission on Oct. 15.

Completions were delayed by at least two operators to comply with the state’s first mandatory flaring reduction target. By Oct. 1, producers were required to capture 74% of their natural gas production or face mandatory production curtailments in January.

“The number one impact there was gas capture plans. I’ve talked to two different operators in the past week, and both of them had postponed anywhere from 20 to 40 completions because they want to arrive at that 74% [target],” Helms said.

Weakening crude prices were also cited. The average price of North Dakota Sweet (NDS) crude was $78.46/bbl in August, down from $86.20/bbl in July, according to pricing information from Flint Hills Resources. On the day of the webinar, the price of NDS fell to $66.25/bbl.

Weakening crude prices contrasted with rising operating costs. In testimony to the state, producers have cited a year-over-year operating cost increase of 36%.

“The average operating cost for a Bakken-Three Forks well is now just under $15,000/month,” Helms said. If weak crude prices persist, Helms expects producers will seek to reduce operating costs and may then begin to lay down rigs.

At crude prices below $70/bbl, drilling in Burke, Bowman, and Slope counties is uneconomic. “We’ve taken a look at the operating costs on a county by county basis, and we have three counties that-right now, at less than $70/bbl-are below break-even,” Helms said.

These counties have higher costs than those in the Bakken core due to relatively low initial production rates, high water disposal costs, and a reliance on diesel power generation.

“The main factor is the initial production rate,” Helms said. “With Bakken and Three Forks wells, the big payout period is in that first 1-2 years, so that initial production rate is a huge driver [of profitability].”

 
Comment by Puggs
2014-12-19 10:59:24

Cray cray tur.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:12:25

Latest rig count just out and North America is down 58 rigs, more than double last weeks decline. The business is shutting down at these levels both here and ironically this week at least even more in Canada.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2014-12-19 11:19:20

Automakers, especially in Europe, are getting reamed by the collapse of the ruble.

http://wolfstreet.com/2014/12/19/global-automakers-get-blasted-by-ruble-crash/

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:41:20

What the article fails to point out is contrary to Obama’s assertion, Russia does make things, in fact the vast majority of automobiles sold in Russia are made in Russia. Some are made by joint ventures and some sole Russian companies. They will now not have to worry about foreign competition, due to the price increases.

Comment by In Colorado
2014-12-19 12:22:32

Yes and no, it depends on the foreign content percentage. I imagine that Russian brands like Lada have higher Russian content than European or Asian cars assembled in Russia, but Ladas are also less desirable. If the foreign content percentage is high then the ruble crash will have an effect on those cars.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 15:58:44

I do not disagree with anything you said but the bottom line is more manufacturing will occur when more Russian made cars are sold as opposed to pure imports.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2014-12-19 13:16:16

These high-end Aerosport folks are in the Ukraine
http://www.aeros.com.ua/index_en.php

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 11:47:21

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_industry_in_Russia

when talking about resource rich economies, economists often talk about the Dutch disease. And what it refers to as one part of your economy doing so well it destroys the rest of your economy. Oil producing countries often have overvalued currencies which makes it hard to produce anything else. Russia has suffered from this and it has hurt its manufacturing companies. The lower ruble is going to help Russia revive them and actually create more employment opportunities.

 
Comment by Cactus
2014-12-19 12:46:56

John Mauldin’s stuff

1. In recent years, America’s oil & gas boom has added $300–$400 billion annually to the economy – without this contribution, GDP growth would have been negative and the nation would have continued to be in recession.
2. America’s hydrocarbon revolution and its associated job creation are almost entirely the result of drilling & production by more than 20,000 small and midsize businesses, not a handful of “Big Oil” companies. In fact, the typical firm in the oil & gas industry employs fewer than 15 people. [We typically don’t think of the oil business as the place where small businesses are created, but for those of us who have been around the oil patch, we all know that it is. That tendency is becoming even more pronounced as the drilling process becomes more complicated and the need for specialists keeps rising. – John]
3. The shale oil & gas revolution has been the nation’s biggest single creator of solid, middle-class jobs – throughout the economy, from construction to services to information technology.
4. Overall, nearly 1 million Americans work directly in the oil & gas industry, and a total of 10 million jobs are associated with that industry.

 
Comment by Cactus
2014-12-19 12:55:42

more from JM

Oil in 2015
With all that as a backdrop, let us return to our original task, which was to think about what will impact the US and global economies in 2015. I’ve been talking to friends and contacts who are serious players in the energy-production sector. This is my takeaway.
The oil-rig count is already dropping, and it will continue to drop as long as oil stays below $60. That said, however, there is the real possibility that oil production in the United States will actually rise in 2015 because of projects already in the works. If you have already spent (or committed to spend) 30 or 40% of the cost of a well, you’re probably going to go ahead and finish that well. There’s enough work in the pipeline (pardon the pun) that drilling and production are not going to fall off a cliff next quarter. But by the close of 2015 we will see a significant reduction in drilling.
Given present supply and demand characteristics, oil in the $40 range is entirely plausible. It may not stay down there for all that long (in the grand scheme of things), but it will reduce the likelihood that loans of the nature and size that were extended the last few years will be made in the future. Which is entirely the purpose of the Saudis’ refusing to reduce their own production. A side benefit to them (and the rest of the world) is that they also hurt Russia and Iran.
Employment associated with energy production is going to fall over the course of next year. It’s not all bad news, though. Employment that benefits from lower energy prices is likely to remain stable or even rise. Think chemical companies that use natural gas as an input as an example.
I am, however, at a loss to think of what could replace the jobs and GDP growth that the energy complex has recently created. Certainly, reduced production is going to impact capital expenditures. This all leads one to begin thinking about a much softer economy in the US in 2015.

Comment by measton
2014-12-20 22:54:10

Me thinks the Saudis will use Hedge Funds to gain control of a big chunk of US oil production.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 13:02:34

Bellevue, WA Sale Prices Sink 5% YoY; Vacancies Rise As Demand Plummets

http://www.zillow.com/bellevue-wa-98007/home-values/

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 16:05:28

I strongly disagree with Sony’s decision. However, Obama is just shifting the blame here. As president he needs to accept responsibility for not protecting an American company from an attack from a foreign country. The buck stops at the president’s office as a Harry Truman said. Why have we given up our privacy to the NSA, if they cannot see and prevent such a massive attack by a foreign government.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/19/media/sony-executive-michael-lynton-responds-to-president-obama/index.html

Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 16:21:03

sony dropped the ball

 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 16:24:19

LOL! Now Obama, personally has to protect private Japanese businesses from being chickenshets?

Sony, is a Japanese multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Kōnan Minato, Tokyo, Japan.

I thought you neo-cons want less gov? Or is that only when convenient?

hypocrites

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 16:54:28

Their studios operate in the US thus they are an American company. The movies are not being made in Japan.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 16:59:33

Conservatives certainly believe that protecting national security is a role of government and it is in the constitution, health care is not. So he does not protect the borders or the country but he engages in activities not mentioned in the constitution.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2014-12-19 17:08:12

Gee, cybersecurity is not mentioned in the constitution, either.

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 17:03:27

That is why they are called Sony USA, an American company but a subsidiary of a Japanese corporation.

http://www.sony.com/SCA/index.shtml

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 18:00:39

Please save us!! But don’t bill us.

 
 
Comment by Avocado
2014-12-19 17:53:45

Sony, is a Japanese multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Kōnan Minato, Tokyo, Japan.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-19 18:26:53

Rolling the dice on the length of this post

Getting a whiff of False Flag here

Sony Hack Reinvigorates Support for Privacy-Busting CISPA-Style Legislation

White House, lawmakers exploit crisis to push for draconian data powers

by Paul Joseph Watson | December 19, 2014

The Sony hack attack has reinvigorated support for privacy-busting CISPA-style cybersecurity legislation that was previously considered dead, prompting calls to make the issue a top priority in 2015.

With the White House declaring the hack to be a “national security issue” yesterday, numerous prominent lawmakers jumped on the issue to push a “zombie” cybersecurity bill – the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act – which failed to make the Senate floor in July.

White House Economic Council Director Jeff Zients said the Sony hack would require ongoing “executive” action by the President in order to protect “federal government assets,” with Zients stressing the need “to take this to the next level (with) legislation.”

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein echoed Zients, asserting, “We must pass an information sharing bill as quickly as possible next year.”

Republican Sen. John McCain also called on Congress to “finally pass long-overdue comprehensive cybersecurity legislation” in light of the Sony hack, a sentiment mimicked by Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I), co-chair of the House cybersecurity caucus, who stated, “The new Congress should act without delay to pass a comprehensive cybersecurity information sharing bill to allow the federal government to share what it knows about threats in cyberspace with the private sector, and vice versa.”

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also called on cybersecurity legislation to be the top priority in January, while President Obama himself told ABC’s David Muir on Wednesday, “Congress also needs to take up cybersecurity legislation that’s been languishing for several years now.”

Following former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s advice to “never let a serious crisis go to waste,” the Obama administration and lawmakers like McCain and Graham are now breathlessly exploiting the Sony hack to reanimate legislation that bears significant resemblance to the widely loathed CISPA bill that failed to pass the Senate in 2012.

According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2014, “Allows companies to monitor private communications on their networks and to disclose user activity to the government. The bill would also exempt companies from liability for monitoring communications or disclosing user information.”

The ACLU’s Sandra Fulton also warns that the bill “Gives the government extraordinary powers to silence potential whistleblowers, and exempts these dangerous new powers from transparency laws.” The legislation would allow the government to approach companies directly for user information without the need to obtain a warrant.

The White House has blamed North Korea for the Sony hack attack although, as Wired notes, the evidence for this assertion is flimsy at best.

Similar calls for draconian cybersecurity legislation, as well as measures that would give the White House Chinese-style web censorship powers, were heard in the aftermath of the Stuxnet virus outbreak in 2010. Despite Alex Jones being labeled a “conspiracy theorist” at the time for fingering the United States as being behind the virus, that premise was confirmed in 2012.

It was also subsequently revealed that the U.S. was responsible for creating the Flame virus that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities. Just as with the Sony hack, in both cases, foreign powers were initially blamed for creating viruses which were actually created by the U.S. and Israel.

 
Comment by jane
2014-12-19 20:52:18

How many times does Sony need to get hacked before they start taking this network security and analytics thingie seriously? What are they doing? Making network security a sinecure job, the place where they place the CEO’s less stellar offspring - err, dumb offspring - on the theory that they’ll be out of the public eye and can’t otherwise do much harm?

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2014-12-19 16:36:31

The sh*t is about to hit the fan in Iraq an Iraqi base is about to fall to ISIS and there are Americans located at the base.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-30492064

 
Comment by real journalists
 
Comment by azdude
2014-12-19 17:22:44

anyone bought any eggs lately in ca? wtf guys

Comment by Housing Analyst
2014-12-19 19:15:41

Turned green from Fukushima radiation?

 
 
Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 20:35:25

And just a reminder for all of you traveling this holiday season

New York Daily News - Where Ebola patient Dr. Craig Spencer went in the city: a timeline

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ebola-patient-dr-craig-spencer-city-timeline-article-1.1986708

Don’t sneeze on your nearby travelers, and don’t put your finger inside your nose or your butthole and go touching other places inside the airplane

Comment by real journalists
2014-12-19 21:05:51

And don’t lick the poles or hanging straps in the New York City subway

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/23/nyregion/new-york-city-ebola-patient-timeline-map.html

“We tortured some folks” — President Barack Hussein Obama

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2014-12-20 09:36:57

phony scandals

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post