January 1, 2015

Bits Bucket for January 1, 2015

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

235 Comments »

Comment by mathguy
2015-01-01 01:57:42

Happy new year and may falling prices be ever in your favor.

Comment by Shillow
2015-01-01 05:58:50

Happy New Year to all, whether you are a shill or a normal person.

2015 is the Chinese Year of the Sheep.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 06:09:42

“At the end of the day, the Fed and its fellow traveling central banks have systematically dismantled the natural stability mechanisms of financial markets. Accordingly, financial markets have now become dangerous casinos in which speculative bubbles are guaranteed to build to dangerous extremes as the central bank driven financial inflation gathers force. That’s where we are now. Again.”

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 11:23:49

Well said.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:11:29

Just don’t buy, and falling prices will be almost always in your favor.

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-01 06:30:32

“Happy new year and may falling prices be ever in your favor.”

Falling wages too, may falling wages be ever in your favor.

When wages fall and expenses don’t then schmucks visit me and plead for money.

The funny thing is, when wages were rising they still came to me to plead for money.

A nation full of dummys (and I am so glad).

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Schmucks work, I reap.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 07:42:52

May cascading defaults rise up to meet you!

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-01 07:50:50

May cascading defaults that rise up to meet me always be backstopped by ignorant American taxpayers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 07:59:46

Next time we hope to see your head on a pike.

Happy New Year!

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-01 08:27:45

“Happy New Year!”

And prosperous, a happy and prosperous new year!

For some, but not for all.

Bahahahahaha

 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 10:51:19

One thing is for certain: At the onset of 2015, California housing prices are still in the throes of a historic mania whose inception dates back to 1996 — pushing two decades now!

Comment by rms
2015-01-01 11:42:21

Yeah, 2/3 of a working person’s career. Incredible.

 
 
 
Comment by Lenderoflastresort
2015-01-01 03:21:42

Happy New Year everyone!

 
Comment by Mugsy
2015-01-01 03:34:50

Happy New Year to Ben and all the long time (and short time)readers!

My average blog attendance time is about 6 months or when the crisis the blog addresses sorts itself out. I’ve been coming here since 2006 and I never thought I would be here 9 years later and the housing crash would still be getting sorted out.

Comment by Jingle Male
2015-01-01 05:51:50

Mugsy, it is a great blog and named for a perpetuating phenomenon.

I also started posting all the crazy & ridiculous activity in 2006. I never dreamed we would still be dealing with the aftermast of the bust in 2015, but I still see a few vestiges of the dysfunction working their way to a reset.

Comment by Shillow
2015-01-01 05:57:28

A few vestiges? You are over your head in it JFraud.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:23:34

Thanks for sharing your perspective on the timing. I also thought the economic shock of the Great Housing Bubble crash would be fully absorbed by now, and share your fascination that it clearly hasn’t.

A related case is worthy of consideration: Japan’s real estate bust started around 1990 and the aftermath is still playing out after a quarter of a century has passed. In light of this fact, we may only be at the top of the fourth inning by now.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 07:26:14

Exactly.

And remember….The price floor for housing is far lower than the minor price floor reached in 2010.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 07:45:11

I think we are only at the top of the second inning. There are some very ugly batters on deck.

Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 11:42:05

10 years and it’s the second inning? Great, I’ll buy a cratered house when I’m 118.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 12:07:07

You already did Donk. At a grossly inflated price.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 13:35:07

Oxide, as long as the Fed can print as much money as it wants, it is very difficult to see how nominal prices on houses can drop very far. Real prices, yes but if you have a loan on the house that is Mr. Banker’s problem not yours.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 15:28:59

Nominal or real…. falling. Just like crude.

Remember…. Falling prices and deflation is your wallets best friend and positively bullish for the economy.</i

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-01 17:04:06

“… but if you have a loan on the house that is Mr. Banker’s problem not yours.”

Problem? A loan from me is for me a problem?

Those who borrow money from me (money that isn’t even mine) work to earn money and then they willingly send some of this earned money to me each and every month for years - for decades - and you consider this to be some sort of a problem of mine?

Bahahahahahaha … Shirley, you jest.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2015-01-02 04:15:08

+118 Oxide.

A lot of people will still be predicting a declining market in 30 + years. Why do we care when our homes will be owned free and clear in fifteen more years?

Paralysis of analysis. The recession ended a few years ago. The recovery is gaining more traction. Life goes forward. Figure it out and make your choices: Bill likes gold, wine & mutual funds. I like real estate and cash flow. You like a beltway job & a comfortable condo. HA hates everything!

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-02 07:47:49

Your crumbling empire of shacks gets in the way of the fact housing is recovering Jingle_Fraud.

Remember, A ‘housing recovery’ is falling prices to dramatically lower and more affordable levels.

Are you sure you want a housing recovery?

 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 09:20:11

A related case is worthy of consideration ??

Yep…Very similar…

 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 05:33:09

stocks and homes will get you out of debt in 2015!

Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-01 08:42:22

Only if you sell for cash and use the cash to pay off the debt.

#GainsAreOnlyPaperUntilYouSell

Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-01 09:06:20

Bingo. It’s not a gain until it is realized.

Now that brings an interesting question: realized in the form of what asset? The Dollar? Fine as long as inflation is slow and it is parked in the Dollar for a short term. Should be realized in a form that is stable relative to the Dollar.

Comment by drumminj
2015-01-01 09:07:29

Should be realized in a form that is stable relative to the Dollar.

I’d argue it should be realized in a form that is stable relative to purchasing power. The thing most stable relative to the dollar is….the dollar :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 12:37:59

I’d argue it should be realized in a form that is stable relative to purchasing power. The thing most stable relative to the dollar is….the dollar

That works for me as long as the prices of goods and services go lock step with the dollar.

These days everyone is talking about gas prices. Fine. They’ve gone down. Wages. Fine. They’ve gone down. Airline tickets have gone remarkably lower over the last 30 years. Only in the last five years have the prices come up a bit.

Houses: Overvalued. Still.

Toyota Corolla Prices going up - trend of last 15 years (used Toyotas) http://www.findthebestcarprice.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Craigslist-used-cars-Toyota-Corolla-Pricing-1024×687.png

Wine prices up: http://enobytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Wine-Cost-and-Price-Trends.jpg

Fast food prices? Up
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/Screen%20Shot%202013-10-22%20at%202.03.04%20PM.png

College tuition prices? Up
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/dam/assets/121023093645-chart-college-tuition-fees-monster.jpg

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 12:55:38

“Houses: Overvalued. Still.”

It’s a real problem when the federal government makes the inflation of one specially favored asset class a policy goal.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 14:37:08

It’s a real problem when the federal government makes the inflation of one specially favored asset class a policy goal.

+infinity.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 05:41:43

“But that does not count the huge amounts of U.S. Treasury securities that the federal government must redeem each year. When these debt instruments hit their maturity date, the U.S. government must pay them off. This is done by borrowing more money to pay off the previous debts. In fiscal year 2013, redemptions of U.S. Treasury securities totaled $7,546,726,000,000 and new debt totaling $8,323,949,000,000 was issued. The final numbers for fiscal year 2014 are likely to be significantly higher than that.”

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 07:37:51

Lesson: Don’t borrow, liquidate and get out of debt. You’ll be glad you did.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-01 07:52:04

Wrong! Wrong! And wrong!

 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 06:00:28

“Well, in recent years government officials figured out that they could save a lot of money on interest payments by borrowing over shorter time frames. For example, it costs the government far more to borrow money for 10 years than it does for 1 year. So a strategy was hatched to borrow money for very short periods of time and to keep “rolling it over” again and again and again.”

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 08:11:22

This strategy only works when interest rates are flat or falling.

When interest rates rise - it leads to bankruptcy…

Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 09:32:52

When interest rates rise - it leads to bankruptcy… ??

Not really…As it relates to the federal government, it just leads to cutting some things and higher taxes…And since the majority of the budget is not discretionary, very little cutting can occur…At least in its current state…

Higher taxes can occur and IMO, will in the form of a complete overhaul of the tax code…Everyone will pay more…I think it will be a major theme of the 2016 election with the bullet-point being inequality, low wages with dead end jobs…I am thinking 2017…

Comment by aNYCdj
2015-01-01 10:17:21

dave you hit the nail on the head..dead end jobs…….

I know that’s happened to me a lot in the last few years, you go into an interview all positive do your homework ask questions, and then realize they just want someone to do the job and that’s it. Then you try and backpedal saying you have outside interests and income, but its too late.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 11:24:29

The statement sums it up in my opinion…Policy going forward is critical IMO to address this problem…Will Jeb make it a focal point ?? I think so….Will Hilary make it a focal point ?? I think so…

Excerpt;

The challenges are many and complex. As researchers, we wrestle with the question: Is the current state of household wealth in the United States positioning enough young people, families and communities to thrive ??

http://link.washingtonpost.com/5483d0d93b35d046478bdbf724p2i.5v2/VKPSiMPoDAF_aYqaA1a05

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2015-01-01 17:56:47

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/sunday-review/why-are-our-schools-still-segregated.html

The truth comes out in plain sight: this is why we need a War on Ebonics

The Normandy school district is among the poorest and most segregated in Missouri. It ranks last in overall academic performance. Its rating on an annual state assessment was so dismal that by the time Mr. Brown graduated the district had lost its state accreditation.

About half of black male students at Normandy High never graduate. Just one in four graduates makes it to a four-year college. The college where Mr. Brown was headed is a for-profit trade school that recruits those it once described in internal documents as “Unemployed, Underpaid, Unsatisfied, Unskilled, Unprepared, Unsupported, Unmotivated, Unhappy, Underserved!”

 
Comment by rms
2015-01-01 22:04:08

“Unemployed, Underpaid, Unsatisfied, Unskilled, Unprepared, Unsupported, Unmotivated, Unhappy, Underserved!”

aka Road Kill.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 22:53:30

You think Normandy district has problems? What about Riverview Gardens, whose unaccredited high school leads students in the district to attend Normandy High as a superior alternative. And I recently learned that Michael Brown was a Riverview Gardens Senior High student for his Sophomore year.

BTW, I’m an RGHS alum. It was fully accredited back in the 1970s when my siblings and I attended. I guess you could say the district subsequently imploded.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-02 09:08:28

Whoa!

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 11:41:13

FYI - we are not that far behind Japan.

Even a small rise in interest rates will bankrupt several countries around the world today - this will soon include the USA in the very near future.

—————————

A Japanese Crisis Nears
Forbes - 8/10/2013

Much less talked about is the impact on Japan from possible QE tapering in the U.S.. If America decides to cut back on money printing next month, and interest rates there rise as a consequence, that would put upward pressure on rates around the world. That’s not what Japan needs given that only a small rise in rates would result in its government debt burden becoming overwhelming – interest rates increasing to just 2% would mean interest expense on government debt equating to 80% of government revenue.

Either of these events may bring forward a Japanese sovereign debt crisis. Long-time readers will know that I view such a crisis as inevitable with the government debt load so large that there are no good choices left. Keep in mind that a Japanese debt crisis would have enormous global consequences. Unlike Greece or Cyprus, Japan matters. It’s the world’s third largest economy and a key trading partner to all of the large powers. How Japan plays out for the remainder of 2013 will be of critical importance to everyone.

Over the past week, Japan celebrated an unusual feat: total government debt passed the one quadrillion yen mark. That’s 1,000,000,000,000,000 yen (15 zeros if you’re counting). Of course, it’s not so daunting in U.S. dollar terms, at a measly $10.5 trillion. Still, the debt versus the country’s GDP is 230%, the highest in the developed world. And if you add in corporate and private debt, total Japanese debt equates to 500% of GDP.

And the bigger problem is that government debt is continuing to rise. Currently at 240% of GDP, the International Monetary Fund estimates that it will get to 250% by year-end. Why is this an issue? Well, when you have government debt at 24x government revenue and interest expenses taking up 25% of government revenue, it becomes a very big issue. Rising interest expenses mean Japan has less to spend on other things, such as social security for its ageing population.

Here’s the rub though. If the government succeeds with its aim to get inflation up to 2%, it’s likely to result in interest rates increasing to +2%. Remember those interest expenses alluded earlier? Well, if rates do rise to 2%, that would result in the interest expense on government debt being 80% of government revenue. Obviously, this would lead to a serious bond market crisis.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 12:12:07

Even a small rise in interest rates will bankrupt several countries around the world today - this will soon include the USA in the very near future ??

Well, we are all familiar with the countries at risk and the impact that rising U.S. interest rates would have on those countries…I believe a recent article posted here discussed wether Yellen would raise rates without considering the impact on some foreign countries…Seems to me that the FED may increase rates in 2016 but I anticipate that it will only be slight..Initially, Maybe 10 basis points…Hardly enough to make the difference in wether a foreign country will implode because of it…

I think the message the FED wants to send is; We are willing to raise rates…How much they do raise them in the face of our own inconsistent and fragmented economy much less its impact on other world economies I think is in question…At least for the next few years…

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 12:57:01

Why would the U.S. (i.e. the Fed) raise rates if that would lead to bankruptcy? Makes no sense…

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 12:54:09

Higher taxes against a backdrop of stagnant incomes will be (and is) deflationary.

Just sayin’…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 13:48:54

Higher taxes against a backdrop of stagnant incomes will be (and is) deflationary ??

I agree…Is the FED going to compound it with significantly higher interest rates…My instincts say no…After tax reform and a new way to collect tax revenue along with a push for infrastructure & manufacturing jobs…Yes…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 06:05:23

“By contrast, an extended regime of ZIRP, coupled with the central banks’ perceived “put” under risk assets, drives the cost of “downside insurance” to negligible levels because S&P 500 put writers are emboldened and subsidized to pick up nickels (i.e. options premium) in front of a benign central bank steamroller. This ultra-cheap downside insurance, in turn, attracts ever larger inflows of speculative capital to the casino.”

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 06:08:04

“This dynamic is evident in the chart of the S&P 500 since the March 2009 bottom. The dips have gotten shallower and shallower as ZIRP and other pro-risk central bank policies have eroded the market’s natural defenses against excessive speculation. As of mid-2014, therefore, it can be fairly said that fear and short interest have been extinguished almost entirely. The Wall Street casino has thus become a one-way market that coils dangerously upward, divorced completely from the fundamentals of earnings and cash flow and real world economic conditions and prospects.”

 
Comment by Shillow
2015-01-01 06:11:18

Is the whole Sony hacker thing a positive or a negative for Truth?

On the one hand you have a situation where fear is stoked and everyone thinks there are some anonymous hackers that could target them and pry into the most intimate details of their life if they wanted to.

On the other, no one like that would really care about some small fish Joe normal citizen and the hackers would seem to care only about targeting bigger fish, those in power, and perhaps exposing their hypocrisy and lies.

How does this tie into housing? Well, we’ve been lied to for years and years and it still goes on, from both small shills and big shills, including the media.

Comment by Guillotine Renovator
2015-01-01 11:48:13

Truth? We haven’t even heard the truth.

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:15:22

A little global warming could come in handy right about now in SoCal.

Freeze Warning in effect until 8:00 AM PST. Source: U.S. National Weather Service

…FREEZE WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 8 AM PST THIS MORNING …
…FREEZE WATCH REMAINS IN EFFECT FROM THIS EVENING THROUGH
FRIDAY MORNING …

A FREEZE WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 8 AM PST THIS MORNING. A
FREEZE WATCH REMAINS IN EFFECT FROM THIS EVENING THROUGH FRIDAY
MORNING.

* TEMPERATURE …LOWER 20S TO LOWER 30S …COLDEST IN LOW-LYING
VALLEYS AND WIND SHELTERED AREAS.

* TIMING …THROUGH 8 AM THIS MORNING …AND AGAIN TONIGHT INTO FRIDAY
MORNING.

* IMPACTS …A FREEZE CAN KILL CROPS AND OTHER SENSITIVE OUTDOOR
PLANTS. BRING PETS INDOORS.

PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS …

A FREEZE WARNING MEANS SUB-FREEZING TEMPERATURES ARE IMMINENT OR
HIGHLY LIKELY. THESE CONDITIONS WILL KILL CROPS AND OTHER
SENSITIVE VEGETATION.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-01-01 10:08:45

What California could use is an end to the drought.

Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 12:30:15

What California could use is an end to the drought ??

Yep….Big problem for the state and for the environment if we don’t get it…

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 12:58:02

Too bad you cannot electronically create water the way you can fiat currency.

Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-01 13:53:17

That can be done, it’s just expensive.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 15:04:51

Nice observation! Too bad electronic money creation is a technically simple matter of creating balance sheet entries in a computer.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by real journalists
2015-01-01 06:38:20

Region VIII checking in

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 07:01:11

“I Am… I Said”

Region IV’s fine, the sun shines most the time
And the feeling is “lay back”
Palm trees grow and rents are low
But you know I keep thinkin’ about
Making my way back

Well I’m Region I born and raised
But nowadays,
I’m lost between two Constitution-free zones
Region IV’s fine, but it ain’t home
Region I’s home,
But it ain’t mine no more

“I am”… I said
To no one there
And no one heard at all
Not even the FEMA Director of Regional Operations

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqOrjrycOT8 - 265k -

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 06:39:54

Why Is The Fed Hiring An “Emergency Preparedness Specialist Familiar With DHS Directives”

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/31/2014

A few weeks ago, we reported that for some still unexplained reason, the US Treasury is ordering “survival kits” to its employees overseeing the federal banking system. To wit:

The Department of Treasury is spending $200,000 on survival kits for all of its employees who oversee the federal banking system, according to a new solicitation. As FreeBeacon reports, survival kits will be delivered to every major bank in the United States and includes a solar blanket, food bar, water-purification tablets, and dust mask (among other things). The question, obviously, is just what do they know that the rest of us don’t?

We still don’t know why. But what makes things even more surprising, and confusing, is that two days before the survival kit RFP soliciation became public on December 4, 2014, a just as curious notice was blasted by the Fed’s recruiting Twitter account:

So the Fed is hiring not just any “emergency preparedness specialist” but one familiar with DHS directives? Here are the details of the position located in Washington, DC:

Position Description

The Emergency Preparedness & Response Specialist is a professional in the field of emergency preparedness. This individual serves as the coordinator in the Management Division (MGT Div.) for emergency preparedness, encompassing the development, coordination, and implementation of: unified planning, disaster preparednes
Responsible for upkeep and maintenance of the Board s Hazardous Materials Response Team (HMRT) training, equipment, and response program, and is responsible for coordinating operational emergency response efforts for the MGT Div.

The Board has a Hazardous Materials Response Team? Comes as news to us.

And perhaps most ironically:

Employment Status: Temporary

Or, as the BLS defines it, “permanent”, net of seasonal adjustments.

The only question is why does the Fed - a uniformly safe institution, where economists engage in deep contemplation and decide how much of the US deficit they will monetize - need a person with these qualifications?

http://www.zerohedge.com/…iring-emergency-preparedness-specialist-familiar-dhs-directives - 153k -

Comment by In Colorado
2015-01-01 10:14:01

The question, obviously, is just what do they know that the rest of us don’t?

On one hand the government is too incompetent to run efficiently, even having trouble successfully deploying a website.

But somehow it is competent enough to predict a zombie apocalypse.

Since when have the Feds ever needed a valid reason to expand bureaucracy by hiring some nimrod who will do nothing but produce documents no one will read?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:12:18

“But somehow it is competent enough to predict a zombie apocalypse.”

Predicting one seems easy enough. But actually taking steps to prepare for it is rather impressive.

 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-01 10:29:24

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 06:39:54

Why Is The Fed Hiring An “Emergency Preparedness Specialist Familiar With DHS Directives”
zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-31/why-fed-hiring-emergency-preparedness-specialist-familiar-dhs-directives

 
 
Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 11:52:05

Geez, that’s better than the “emergency kits” that we got. I guess all the feds get them, in case something happens to the office building. All ours had was dead batteries and expired water.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 12:04:09

A bug-out bag is a good thing to have built and ready to go, especially if the area you live in is prone to natural or man-made disasters. This one pretty much covers all the bases.

http://graywolfsurvival.com/66545/how-to-build-ultimate-25-pound-bug-bag/

Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 15:19:30

Thank you. I have a bug out bag at home and another kit in the car. I haven’t gotten around to an office kit yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 14:41:12

and expired water.

Storing your own water is trivial—why do you need someone else to store it for you?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 16:31:23

Maybe some Darwinian natural selection is in order here….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 12:59:27

“…survival kits will be delivered to every major bank in the United States and includes a solar blanket, food bar, water-purification tablets, and dust mask (among other things).”

No gold, guns or ammo? Seems rather odd…

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 19:20:26

“No gold, guns or ammo?”

They already have it.

“So the Fed is hiring not just any “emergency preparedness specialist” but one familiar with DHS directives? Here are the details of the position located in Washington, DC:”

1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It’s Time For A National Conversation

Ralph Benko Contributor
3/11/2013

The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice. It confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. As reported elsewhere, some of this purchase order is for hollow-point rounds, forbidden by international law for use in war, along with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month. Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years.

http://www.forbes.com/…/ - 348k - Cached - Similar pages
Mar 11, 2013

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-01 20:14:04

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 19:20:26

1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It’s Time For A National Conversation
forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2013/03/11/1-6-billion-rounds-of-ammo-for-homeland-security-its-time-for-a-national-conversation/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:46:59

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 03:42:41

Real interest rates have soared. DIX up from 80 to 90 in six months. That looks a lot like 20%+ for anyone owing USD.

Crushing.

That’s a great point I hadn’t considered: Has deflation plus static nominal interest rates brought on the long-heralded rate increases that nobody even noticed, save a few astute observers like Blue Skye?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:48:05

P.S. What’s the DIX? I took a shot at Googling it to no avail.

Comment by Dudgeon Bludgeon
2015-01-01 07:11:26

I’m pretty sure he means DXY.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 07:52:01

Yes, sorry, DXYlexic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 09:39:35

Yes, sorry, DXYlexic ??

Nice come-back….

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:15:05

No worries, though I was pretty freaked out last night when I misperceived that you had discovered an acronym unknown to Google!

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:28:34

Congratulations to anyone who kept a large slice of their assets in dollars this past year, as this chart indicates you did quite well.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 13:38:51

Yesiree indeed I did. And I keep collecting more of them.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 14:43:15

Congratulations to anyone who kept a large slice of their assets in dollars

Woo-hooo!!!!! That’s the first year in a LONG time that I’ve been on the winning side of that one…

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 15:06:42

What I find a bit mysterious is how the U.S. dollar, stocks and bonds all had such a stellar year. How often does this happen, and is the trend sustainable? If not, what gives?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 15:26:24

The dollar has been the winning side of the trade for a decade.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 16:23:15

The dollar has been the winning side of the trade for a decade.

Did you even look at the chart?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 17:29:46

Two years ago you told us the .dxy doesn’t matter. Get your stories straight.

In the meantime, enjoy falling prices. Falling prices is good for the economy and very patriotic.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 19:15:24

Two years ago you told us the .dxy doesn’t matter. Get your stories straight.

No, I said that my dollars were buying less at the grocery and almost every other store; an increasing DXY value does not necessarily mean that my dollars are gaining in purchasing power. You had implied at the time that it was climbing due to deflation; you were, and still are, wrong about that. Get your story straight.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-02 07:49:29

Falling prices. Get over it.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-02 09:09:27

Not showing up in steak prices at the grocery yet…

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-02 09:16:30

Falling housing prices, falling commodity prices…. and whoops… falling beef prices.

You’ve got a problem.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 07:56:37

There’s some definite deflation somewhere, because the grocery stores are decreasing prices. “New Lower Everyday Price” tickets everywhere. I don’t know if that is because of the drop in gas prices or in addition to. My guess is in addition to. The grocery is more of a savings than gas.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 08:15:37

Think about the energy/oil component of food and you will realize that food prices are a proxy for oil price, albeit with a time lag.

Other things that are a proxy for energy price include steel, aluminum, plastic, lumber, bricks, cement, glass…all the components of a house except for the credit.

I stocked up on coffee in Canada last week for $3/lb. That was pleasant.

Comment by drumminj
2015-01-01 08:42:52

I stocked up on coffee in Canada last week for $3/lb. That was pleasant.

Ooh, good idea. I’m due for a Trader Joe’s run!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 18:48:29

It was grass fed coffee.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-01-01 10:23:41

There’s some definite deflation somewhere, because the grocery stores are decreasing prices. “New Lower Everyday Price” tickets everywhere.

Not at the meat counter. I bought four NY striploins yesterday at the warehouse club. While cheaper than at the grocery store, the price was at an all time high for the warehouse club.

To be honest, I’m not seeing these falling prices. Fruit, produce, eggs, dairy, meat are as expensive as ever. Maybe the highly processed, high carb, high fructose synthefood is cheaper?

Comment by Michael Viking
2015-01-01 10:40:29

To be honest, I’m not seeing these falling prices.

Agreed. We track our expenses to the penny. We’re not seeing anything going down except gas. Maybe here the cheaper gas hasn’t wound its way into cheaper products yet.

Same caveat: we don’t buy highly processed stuff either, so maybe that’s where the savings are at.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 11:26:26

I am also paying the highest price ever for ribeye (we call it Delmonico here). Wholesale beef doubled a few years ago and then went up as much again in 2014. There is some kind of shortage but I have no idea where or why.

The price of basic grains has been tumbling since midsummer at the wholesale level though I expect it will take a while to show through in the grocery store. I wonder when the OJ marketers will put back the missing 5 oz of juice in the half gallon bottles.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 11:59:29

Wasn’t the beef shortage due to enough drought in Cali that farmers had to cull the herds? Also, any disruption in corn will do it. Don’t seem to have the other issues with other animals. The fridge-case with the bags of cold cuts is stuffed with honey ham and pepper turkey and oven-baked chicken and cheese out the wazoo, but I’m like where’s the beef.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 12:11:18

Grass fed chicken?

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 14:36:42

why not raise the price if people continue to buy?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 15:25:09

Whose buying?? Demand is cratering.

 
Comment by oxide
2015-01-01 15:32:32

Most of the meat I buy is grass fed, but, as I said the other day to GS fixer, it’s hard for me to buy and cook 100% of my food. I do like the convenience factor sometimes. BTW, where I am, rotisserie chicken dropped by a buck.

Fresh veggies are still expensive, but IMO they’re a crock anyway. The foodie advocates love to push “fresh produce” without regard to the how hard it is to stock things out of season. For heaven’s sake, buy frozen. It’s just as good, much cheaper, doesn’t spoil, usually doesn’t come from China/Mexico, and takes no time to prepare.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 16:11:23

The chickens are grass fed too?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 16:20:00

“rotisserie chicken”

Ever notice how cheap they are compared to fresh uncooked “young hens”? They are old laying hens, loaded up with hormones, so we hear.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:50:08

Are $30 oil prices within reach now?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:52:30

I bought gas for $1.799 a gallon just yesterday.

The Buzz
How low will oil fall? $30 is possible
By Matt Egan
December 31, 2014: 1:56 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Look out below! The plunge in oil prices may not be over just yet.

Oil took another hit Wednesday, sinking below $53 to a level last seen during the Great Recession. It’s hard to recall that crude oil traded for over $100 a barrel as recently as July.

Few saw the energy meltdown coming. Now that it’s here, industry analysts warn another move lower is possible as the momentum remains firmly to the downside.

If this doesn’t hold, we could go back to price levels in late 2008 and early 2009 — down in the $30s. There’s no reason why it couldn’t happen,” said Darin Newsom, senior analyst at Telvent DTN.

That would be good news for the overall U.S. economy, especially consumers who are saving money each time they fill up their gas tanks. If oil fell to around $40 a barrel, that would translate to a national gas average of roughly $1.80 a gallon.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 07:58:38

We have higher gas taxes here. I stopped in the wholesale club for gas @ $2.50 but had to go in to renew my membership. It took a while as they were pushing a credit scheme. Ok, no fees and if I use the store card to buy gas I get another 10c off per gallon, plus discounted membership and dollars back on food purchases. Preauthorized for a staggering credit limit, which will do neither me nor them any “good”. I hate the schemes to get people into debt, but I’ll play my way.

When I got out of the store to fill up the price had dropped another 2c. I am glad I put the boat up with an empty gas tank this year!

 
Comment by measton
2015-01-01 10:07:57

If we were smart we’d throw a tax on gas to keep it at 4-5 bucks a gallon and watch Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran collapse. We’d cut payroll taxes with the proceeds or ramp up infrastructure spending.

I haven’t been to the gas station in about a year and it feels great. It’s one of the most manipulated commodities out there. Still haven’t put in solar but that will lock in my energy costs for the next 20 years, F the fed, opec, big oil, and WS.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 11:35:39

Ahem, that would destablize our “ally” the House of Saud (which funds Islamic extremism all over the globe).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 11:45:13

If we were smart we’d throw a tax on gas to keep it at 4-5 bucks a gallon and watch Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran collapse. We’d cut payroll taxes with the proceeds or ramp up infrastructure spending.

Liberals are funny. Really funny. In a very strange way.

An additional $5 tax on a gallon of gasoline and liberals think nothing would bad would happen except to some country far, far away…

Proof positive why liberals should never have power.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2015-01-01 23:19:14

Greg Mankew’s idea
GOP economist.

 
 
Comment by rms
2015-01-01 12:11:21

“I haven’t been to the gas station in about a year and it feels great.”

Impressed. Bicycle, Metro-Pass, etc., how do you pull that off?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 06:54:47

Is it coincidental or causal that oil prices have retraced to pre-quantitative easing levels?

Energy
Oil prices fall 46% in 2014, worst since 2008

By: Roger Yu
December 31, 2014 9:51 am

Oil prices fell Wednesday and ended the year with the worst annual price drop since 2008, reflecting the global supply glut caused by slowing demand from China and the booming U.S. shale production.

U.S. crude (West Texas Intermediate) settled down 85 cents to $53.27 Wednesday. It dropped 46% for the year.

Brent was down 57 cents Wednesday to $57.33. It fell 48% for the year.

In the past, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has cut oil output to keep price afloat in times of supply abundance. But the group, comprised of 12 oil producing nations, has been reluctant to lower supply this year, fearing that its market share will be eroded by heightened competition from U.S. suppliers.

While a Reuters survey Tuesday showed that OPEC nations’ output fell by 270,000 barrels per day in November and December, it still predicts “a large excess supply next year.”

“The main reason for oil’s decline is OPEC sitting on the fence,” Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS AG in Zurich, told Bloomberg News. “To prevent an excessive inventory build-up, non-OPEC supply growth, particularly U.S. tight oil, needs to decelerate or stall temporarily.”

Inventories at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI futures, increased by 2 million barrels to 30.8 million, according to Bloomberg News. That’s the highest stockpile level since February.

Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 07:58:27

“Oil prices fell Wednesday and ended the year with the worst annual price drop since 2008 …”

“… the worst annual price drop since 2008 …”

Unless you are a consumer of the stuff. If you are a consumer of the stuff then it becomes “the best annual price drop since 2008″.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 08:01:26

Yes, but awful for the debt peddlers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 08:29:59

My heart bleeds …

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 10:03:32

Right before our eyes the shale oil industry and the four million barrels of oil production is disappearing. We are losing 35 to 40 rigs per day. Each Bakken or Eagle Ford well produces 500 barrels per day although that production rate does not last long. Another poster since they can drill a well in 21 days, I do not know if that includes moving the rig. I have seen estimates around 30 days. But lets be conservative and say each rig drills ten wells per year. That is five thousand barrels per day, ignoring the decline rate. Times forty that is two hundred thousand barrels per day. Times thirty five it is one hundred and seventy five thousand. So just in the last two weeks we have lost 375,000 barrels of production over a year. We are tying to set oil prices by fiat not by real supply and demand, if it continues for long gasoline will have to be rationed just like goods in the old Soviet Union.

 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 10:15:36

“We are losing 35 to 40 rigs per day.”

Losing? These things get lost?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 10:16:04

35 to 40 rigs per week

 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 10:21:59

What, they get swallowed up by a black hole or something?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 10:22:14

That’s like saying there will be a housing shortage in China and people will have to live in cardboard boxes.

Don’t get hysterical.

 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 10:25:43

Not hysterical, just want to know how such large things as oil drilling rings can somehow become lost.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 10:26:56

Even at $100 a barrel many thought that shale oil and shale gas industry was a Ponzi scheme and would not be profitable over the long run due to the rapid declines in production. With oil in the 50s the industry is dead and we will soon have the biggest oil shortage since 1979.

 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-01-01 10:28:38

How about all the money that went into financing these lost oil drilling rigs, did it become lot as well?

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 11:24:22

“That’s like saying there will be a housing shortage in China and people will have to live in cardboard boxes.

Don’t get hysterical.”

But the SpaceDonk says insane stuff like that anyways. lol

 
Comment by shendi
2015-01-01 11:36:40

Shale oil production cost from various analysts estimate that oil should stay at $50/ barrel for over 12 months to have a serious effect on the production.
Some excerpts:


Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in hydrocarbon-rich underground shale layers has helped U.S. oil production grow 65 percent in the past five years to the highest level since 1986. That’s reduced U.S. crude imports by more than 3.1 million barrels a day since peaking in 2005.

The cargoes that the U.S. isn’t using have added supply into the world market at the same time that economic growth has slowed, leading to a 26 percent drop in Brent prices since June 19.

About 2.6 million barrels a day of crude production worldwide comes from projects with break-even prices above $80, the IEA said. U.S. tight oil contributes less than 200,000 barrels a day of that.

“Technological and organizational improvements that have enabled faster drilling rates, greater drilling density, and higher new-well production have all been important to maintaining production in the face of increasingly steep decline curves,” the agency said in its report.

U.S. shale producers could keep pumping oil economically even if Brent dropped to $60 a barrel, Bjornar Tonhaugen, an analyst with Oslo-based Rystad Energy, said in an e-mailed report. Brent would need to remain at $50 a barrel for 12 months before North American shale output drops 500,000 barrels a day, he said.

 
Comment by shendi
2015-01-01 11:49:38

For those in the planning/ forecasting business in various industries: at what IRR will your company invest?

In my industry, the estimated IRR should be above 40%, which is typically overestimated while the real IRR comes to about 10~15% when everything is executed.

Compare this to the US Bakken /shale oil production IRRs of 35% to 50% (varies with region) with a price of WTI at $60.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 12:50:30

“U.S. shale producers could keep pumping oil economically even if Brent dropped to $60 a barrel, Bjornar Tonhaugen, an analyst with Oslo-based Rystad Energy, said in an e-mailed report. Brent would need to remain at $50 a barrel for 12 months before North American shale output drops 500,000 barrels a day, he said.”

That is his opinion but the reality is that drilling in the U.S. is dropping like a stone so he is wrong. If drillers could make money at these levels they would not be cutting back on drilling as rapidly as they are. The US is in an economic war with Russia and will look for propaganda wherever they can find it. The average price needed for shale oil is $68 a barrel based on a Morgan Stanley report. The manipulation is rampant, the Fed spiked the dollar every time the price of oil started to recover, but in the end Obama is destroying the shale oil industry with the manipulated oil prices and hurting even high tech with the manipulated dollar, which is part of the oil scheme. But in the end he is going to lose and Putin win because shale oil is costly with a high rate of production decline. Reagan may have destroyed the Soviet Union by crashing oil, however Obama is no Reagan and he does not understand how different shale oil production is from conventional oil production.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 12:58:12

In the meantime, crude prices crater, tanks farms across the globe overflow and demand goes lower.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 13:11:49

There is hardly any more oil in storage this year than last year, world wide demand is expected to rise about 1% this year and oil price have been bouncing up and down in the 50s for several weeks now. But thanks for playing.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 13:14:30

You’re backpedalling Dan.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:18:38

shendi = GO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-AL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 14:16:34

More gasoline demand and growth in China, 27 million light vehicles produced in China per year by 2018:

Hyundai Motor Co said on Tuesday it would build two factories in China, its first new manufacturing plants since 2012 as the South Korean automaker bets on growth in the world’s biggest car market even as the economy slows.

Hyundai said the factories, which will start production in 2016 and 2017, would help it better compete with rivals including Volkswagen and General Motors. Affiliate Kia Motors Corp also said it would expand capacity at one of its three Jiangsu province factories to up to 450,000 vehicles by 2016 from 300,000 now.

The automakers declined to give a value for the investments but Hyundai said the factories - which are capable of producing 300,000 vehicles each - would help it and Kia maintain their market share of over 10 percent in China.

The duo said they expect to have a combined China production capacity of 2.7 million passenger and commercial vehicles by 2018.

Hyundai and Kia’s expansion plans come a few days after executives at Toyota Motor Corp told Reuters the Japanese automaker was likely to miss its 2014 target due to a faster-than-expected economic slowdown.

The plans announced on Tuesday also provide further evidence that the two automakers are easing an unofficial moratorium on capacity growth imposed about two years ago by Chairman Chung Mong-koo due to quality concerns.

Hyundai said construction of its Hebei province plant, to be located in city of Changzhou, will start in the second quarter of 2015. The factory will be able to produce small vehicles by the second half of 2016 and production will reach full capacity by 2018.

Construction on the Chongqing plant will start in the third quarter of 2015. That factory will make small and mid-sized vehicles as well as vehicles specifically targeting China from the first half of 2017, Hyundai added.

Hyundai currently has three factories in China.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 14:36:07

More evidence that governments manipulates the future markets, is it really such a stretch that the U.S has manipulated oil?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-31/congressman-confirms-foreign-central-banks-buying-us-stock-futures-good-liquidity

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 14:42:02

we should keep drilling so people still have jobs. We can print some more cash to compensate for the losses.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 15:35:27

In my industry, the estimated IRR should be above 40%, which is typically overestimated while the real IRR comes to about 10~15% when everything is executed.

Wow, what _terrible_ analysts your industry has!!

Those past misestimates should be subjected to postmortems, and each new estimate improved by what is learned.

 
Comment by shendi
2015-01-01 16:15:58

Prime, you are right, but remember the analysts’ jobs depend on it - to goose up the estimates. Almost all corporates are like that - since these people (director level and up) do not stay longer than a couple of years at one place.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 16:28:49

but remember the analysts’ jobs depend on it - to goose up the estimates.

Then management is clearly to blame; they have failed to appropriately align incentives with business interests.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 17:20:15

We are strangers in a strange land.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 12:11:14

Plunging oil prices may be the first major black swan to hit Fed-blown asset bubbles in 2015.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-18/bankers-see-1-trillion-of-investments-stranded-in-the-oil-fields.html

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 13:21:09

Good article and if people bother to read it, they will learn that even $75 oil crashes the oil shale party. That is why I am predicting $75 to $80 oil by the end of the year. Obama’s war on Putin is going to make a lot of U.S. investors and bankers very unhappy when the loans do not get paid and the damage to shale oil producers will take years to repair. Thus, the price of oil will be higher than it would have been had the U.S working with the Saudis manipulated oil lower. The U.S. using the dollar and the Saudis by maxing out their oil production.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 13:36:47

In the meantime, houses and crude continue to crater.

Liquidate and hold onto every dollar you’ve got. You’ll be glad you did.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-01 15:24:11

“Good article and if people bother to read it, they will learn that…”

…Russia has some of the highest oil production costs in the world. Must be why the Putin-bots are getting frantic.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 16:38:53

Don’t let the facts get in the way of your opinion, you never have, Russia’s cost of production is in the 50s.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/51cc00ba-7f85-11e4-86ee-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl#axzz3NcF29sai

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 16:39:09

Dan, I think maybe you overestimate the Saudi’s determination to undercut the US shale industry as a competitor. US-based oil production could also diminish the strategic importance of Saudi Arabia to the United States, which would seemingly be viewed as inimical to the House of Saud.

 
Comment by spook
2015-01-01 16:40:57

Putin could double or triple the ticket price for a ride on a Soyuz to the I$$.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 16:43:04

Bad link previously, but Russia’s cost of production is in the 50s:

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/51cc00ba-7f85-11e4-86ee-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3NcF29sai

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 16:48:22

Excerpt from FT article which will post soon, Russia’s cost is in the 50s.

Most at risk are those in the Canadian oil sands which has a break-even price of $80 a barrel, US shale plays and other areas of tight oil ($76). Brazil’s deepwater fields ($75) and Mexican projects (around $70) are also vulnerable.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 17:22:58

Dan, I think maybe you overestimate the Saudi’s determination to undercut the US shale industry as a competitor

I never thought that the Saudis have been motivated by the need to undercut the US shale industry. I always thought their motivation is to punish Iran and Russia for supporting Syria. It would be very easy for Saudi Arabia to cut back on production particularly since it production capacity is dropping due to its fields depleting.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 17:38:16

That might not be a bad thing considering oil demand and prices are cratering.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 17:43:34

BTW, I looked at the chart again and Russia’s cost of production is below $50.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-01 17:47:07

Ironically, the cost of producing oil depends on the cost of oil itself, as it is an energy intensive activity. You may be reading hundreds of articles a day trying to catch up on the oil economy, but that won’t give insight, as the writers have none, or cannot afford professionally to share it.

There is no analysis of energy returned on energy invested. There hasn’t been for a very long time. It is all about the financial “story” and the pitch for investors, plays on interest rates and subsidies. What producers “need” for their oil has more to do with what they borrowed than it does with what it costs to pump it out of the ground. Had a look at Venezuela lately?

The big story here is the credit expansion and what is happening now as we leave that era.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-01 18:56:52

“BTW, I looked at the chart again and Russia’s cost of production is below $50.”

The chart in the Bloomberg article shows Russia’s production costs are some of the highest in the world. We can’t seem to see the chart you refer to.

 
Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-02 00:32:22

High oil prices has been one of the biggest scams perpetrated on the world since One Hour Martinizing and Communism.

#Sh.t’sAboutToGetReal

 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2015-01-01 11:52:04

“Are $30 oil prices within reach now?”

Time for a quick trip out to Torrey Pines State Reserve on the coast. :)

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:25:37

Great choice. We visited it with my FIL last month. This is definitely one of the premier nature preserves within San Diego County.

Comment by rms
2015-01-01 22:15:36

Great choice.

Wife and I used to walk through Montaña de Oro state park near San Luis Obispo on New Years Day every year. Really missing the Central Coast these days as winter’s grip is colder than the dairy locker at Safeway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2015-01-01 07:07:06

realtors are liars

Comment by real journalists
2015-01-01 16:05:51

You can say that again

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 17:27:04

I will. And do so properly.

Realtors are LIARS

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 07:43:18

Contra Costa County, CA Sale Prices Plunge 6% YoY; Plummet 9% MoM

http://www.car.org/marketdata/data/countysalesactivity/

 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 08:21:06

Eight years of rule of Harry Reid and Senate Majority Leader and the democrats in the Senate is now officially OVER.

What did the democrats in the senate do in those eight years?

1. NOT ONE BUDGET. Eight years of continuing resolutions.

2. OBAMACARE passed on Christmas Eve without one republican vote.

3. Over 300 passed house bill that were forbidden to be brought up for debate or vote (to include reducing the budget deficit, getting government out of the housing market, ending bailouts, etc.). This was done to protect obama from actually having to make a hard decision and veto something.

4. Elimination of the filibuster to approve judicial and executive nominations.

5. A loss of the “deliberate” senate. It is now hyper-partisan.

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-01 10:38:57

For the past few months I suddenly began receiving emails from Harry, recounting the wonders he’s working for us constituents here in Nevada. He’s remembered we exist. I immediately hit unsubscribe but to no avail. Now I mark them junk, and delete.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-01 14:08:58

3. Over 300 passed house bill that were forbidden to be brought up for debate or vote (to include reducing the budget deficit, getting government out of the housing market, ending bailouts, etc.). This was done to protect obama from actually having to make a hard decision and veto something.

You forgot to mention that the House voted to repeal Obamacare a few dozen times.

4. Elimination of the filibuster to approve judicial and executive nominations.

Yeah, Reid and the Democrats screwed up there. They should have eliminated the filibuster altogether.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 08:28:37

Is it “go time” in 2015?

Lots of these predictions will lead to wars and revolutions…

—————————–

2015 Will Be The Year Of Dollar Danger For The World
The Telegraph (UK) | 1-1-2015 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

America’s closed economy can handle a surging dollar and a fresh cycle of rising interest rates. Large parts of the world cannot. That in a nutshell is the story of 2015.

Tightening by the US Federal Reserve will have turbo-charged effects on a global financial system addicted to zero rates and dollar liquidity.

Yields on 2-year US Treasuries have surged from 0.31pc to 0.74pc since October, and this is the driver of currency markets.

Since the New Year ritual of predictions is a time to throw darts, here we go: the dollar will hit $1.08 against the euro before 2015 is out, and 100 on the dollar index (DXY).

Sterling will buckle to $1.30 as a hung Parliament prompts global funds to ask why they are lending so freely to a country with a current account deficit reaching 6pc of GDP.

There will be a mouth-watering chance to invest in the assets of the BRICS and mini-BRICS at bargain prices, but first they must do penance for $5.7 trillion in dollar debt, and then do surgery on obsolete growth models.

The Yellen Fed will be forced to back down in the end, just as the Bernanke Fed had to retreat after planning a return to normal policy at the end of QE1 and QE2.

At best we are entering a new financial order where there is no longer an automatic “Fed Put” or a “Politburo Put” to act as a safety net for asset markets. That may be healthy in many ways, but it may also be a painful discovery for some.

The European Central Bank cannot save the day for asset markets as the Fed pulls back: it does not print dollars, and dollars are what now matter.

The eurozone will be in deflation by February, forlornly trying to ignite its damp wood by rubbing stones. Real interest rates will ratchet higher. The debt load will continue to rise at a faster pace than nominal GDP across Club Med. The region will sink deeper into a compound interest trap.

Breaking my normal rule of discussing equity prices let me say only that the S&P 500 index of Wall Street stocks will not defy monetary gravity or the feedback loops of global stress for much longer. Half the earnings of US big-cap companies come from overseas, repatriated into a stronger dollar, and therefore worth less in reporting terms.

The index has risen at double-digit rates for three years, further inflated this year by companies buying back their own shares at a pace of $130bn a quarter, often with borrowed money. The profit share of GDP is at a post-war high of 12.5pc (much like 1929), an untenable level as US wages start to rise and the balance of power swings back to labour. The S&P index measuring the price-to-sales ratio is higher today than at its pre-Lehman peak.

Expect a shake-out of 20pc comparable to the LTCM crisis in 1998 when the wheels came off in Russia and East Asia, though don’t be shocked by worse. Emerging markets are a much bigger part of the world economy today, and their combined debt ratio is a record 175pc of GDP.

Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-01 08:48:03

“Lots of these predictions will lead to wars and revolutions…”

Can you say Fundamental Transformation?…I knew you could.

#ClowardAndPivenStrategy

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 09:52:41

Nice post 2-fruit…

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:35:39

Higher interest rates will only serve to kick the dollar’s uptrend into overdrive. 2015 should be another great year for the dollar, no?

Sadly, this implies another not so good a year for the commodity bulls who jawbone here.

Currencies
Dollar has its best year since 2005
Published: Dec 31, 2014 5:02 p.m. ET
Euro slumps to two-year low
Time to pop the champagne — this was the dollar’s best year in almost a decade
By William Watts and Sara Sjolin

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The U.S. dollar ended its strongest year since 2005 with gains versus major rivals as investors penciled in further strength in the U.S. economy and diverging monetary policy paths between a more hawkish Federal Reserve and dovish European and Japanese central banks.

The benchmark which measures the greenback against a basket of six rival currencies, traded at 90.269 in late North American trade, up 0.3% from Wednesday and by 12.8% since the end of 2013.

The wider WSJ Dollar Index rose 0.38 point on Wednesday, to 83.04.

The euro is down around 12% versus the dollar in 2014, which is also the biggest drop since 2005. The U.S. currency has advanced 13.8% against the yen.

In Wednesday’s trade, the euro slipped to $1.2100, compared with $1.2155 on Tuesday, and putting it at its lowest level since mid-2012. The yen weakened; the dollar bought ¥119.79, compared with ¥119.56 late Tuesday.

The euro has been pressured on expectations the European Central Bank will move in early 2015 to implement full-blown quantitative easing in an effort to fight off the prospect of outright deflation. Renewed political turmoil in Greece, which faces snap elections in January, is also weighing on the shared currency.

“While the key driver of our EURUSD forecast for sustained depreciation to $1.07 in Q4 2015 is diverging monetary policies, given our expectation for the announcement of QE by the ECB at its January 2015 meeting, we think this political uncertainty should provide another deterrent to euro ownership,” wrote Francois Cabau, strategist at Barclays.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 08:39:58

“I’m really good at killing people”
- obama

—————-

Who’s Being Targeted for Assassination by Drone?
Zerohedge - 12/31/2014

Spiegel reports this week that drug dealers and low-level Taliban members were targeted for death by drone:

NATO didn’t just target the Taliban leadership, but also eliminated mid- and lower-level members of the group on a large scale. Some Afghans were only on the list because, as drug dealers, they were allegedly supporting the insurgents.

The operations were based on the lists maintained by the CIA and NATO — Obama’s lists. The White House dubbed the strategy “escalate and exit.”

According to the NSA document, in October 2008 the NATO defense ministers made the momentous decision that drug networks would now be “legitimate targets” for ISAF troops. “Narcotics traffickers were added to the Joint Prioritized Effects List (JPEL) list for the first time,” the report reads. In the opinion of American commanders like Bantz John Craddock, there was no need to prove that drug money was being funneled to the Taliban to declare farmers, couriers and dealers as legitimate targets of NATO strikes.

Strikes focused on the Kill List “killed on average 28 other people before they actually succeeded in killing their target.”

Indeed, even the process for deciding who to put on the “kill list” is flawed. People are often targeted by the metadata on their phones, a process which a former top NSA official called the drone assassination program “undisciplined slaughter.” And people are targeted for insanely loose reasons. As the New York Times reported in 2012:

Mr. Obama had approved not only “personality” strikes aimed at named, high-value terrorists, but “signature” strikes that targeted training camps and suspicious compounds in areas controlled by militants.

And then there are “double taps” … where the family members, friends or neighbors who try to rescue someone hit by a drone missile are themselves targeted for assassination.

 
Comment by drumminj
2015-01-01 08:48:13

Anyone feel like being a guinea pig in the new year? I’m testing a new version of the Joshua Tree Extension and would appreciate a little extra testing before pushing it out to everyone.

The major change is that the method of ignoring posts has become less intrusive.

You can contact me via the “support email” link on the extension’s web page:

Joshua Tree Extension

As always, if you use and appreciate the functionality of the extension, please be sure to tip your host (Mr. Ben Jones)

 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 08:58:14

The Ironies of Oil
Townhall.com | December 31, 2014 | Victor Davis Hanson

Gasoline prices are on the verge of crashing down to below $2 a gallon. The price of oil may dip below $50 a barrel.

Even with renewed demand from a global economic resurgence, energy prices continue to fall. The U.S. has suddenly become the world’s largest combined producer of oil and natural gas.

That fact — along with a desire to weaken hostile Iran and Russia — has prompted the oil-rich Gulf sheikdoms to keep pumping oil even as the price falls. In their game of petro-chicken, the desperate sheiks hope that either their poorer enemies will run out of cash, or that fracking in the U.S. will become unprofitable and cease.

Everyone seems to have forgotten about “peak oil” — the catchphrase of the new millennium.

The world in general, and the United States in particular, supposedly had already burned more oil than was left under the Earth. Under President Barack Obama, gasoline prices had soared. When he entered office in January 2009, gas prices averaged around $1.60 per gallon. Four years later, by spring of 2013, gas prices had climbed beyond $3.50 a gallon.

Decreased use of expensive energy was deemed desirable. Cash-strapped commuters would be forced to drive less, thereby advancing the noble cause of curbing supposed manmade global warming. Federal subsidies flowed for high-speed rail. Wind, solar and other alternate energies could at last become competitive. Cap-and-trade legislation looked as if it might sail through Congress.

Unfortunately for the Obama administration, the new age of sky-high oil prices proved an economic disaster. The natural cycle of recovery never quite followed the end of the recession in mid-2009, as U.S. budget and trade deficits soared.

Abroad, all the wrong countries were empowered as never before.

The late Hugo Chavez used his oil windfall in Venezuela to subsidize subversion throughout Latin America. Petrodollar-rich Russian President Vladimir Putin charted a confident anti-American foreign policy.

Iran used its growing riches to step up progress toward producing a nuclear bomb while upping subsidies to terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah.

Almost everything Obama tried for six years in an effort to rev the economy — from near-zero interest rates and $1 trillion annual budget deficits to Obamacare and vast increases in entitlements — has failed. His foreign-policy stances of resets and leading from behind led to chaos and emboldened enemies.

Abroad, spendthrift oil producers such as hostile Iran, Russia and Venezuela are nearly broke. Friendly rivals such as Japan and the European Union can’t compete with the U.S. energy edge.

What Obama once ridiculed is now saving him from himself — after he had championed policies that nearly destroyed him.

The Greeks had a word for it: irony.

Comment by scdave
2015-01-01 10:01:17

His foreign-policy stances of resets and leading from behind led to chaos and emboldened enemies ??

Dick Cheney For President !!!!

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:38:41

Everyone seems to have forgotten about “peak oil” — the catchphrase of the new millennium.

I haven’t forgotten it. New Era thinking like this was one of the key factors in pushing prices to bubble levels which set the stage for the collapse now underway.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-01 14:19:09

That’s a nearly incoherent rant from his Hanson character. He can be put on the list to be ignored.

Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-02 00:39:02

Doesn’t fit the narrative I guess.

#FundamentalTransformationOfAmerica

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 09:33:02

“Give me control of a nation’s money
and I care not who makes the laws.”

Mayer Amschel Rothschild

[Mayer Amschel Bauer] (1744 -1812),

Lord Jacob Rothschild Confronted About Bilderberg & The Federal …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLlxqGkmq0k - 367k - Cached - Similar pages
Jun 1, 2012

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 09:41:11

A Rothschild Speaks - Listen Closely - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3EUzV5_TUs - 471k - Cached - Similar pages

Jan 31, 2012

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 09:53:56

Housing Costs for Renters Rose by $20.6 Billion This Year

By John Gittelsohn Dec 30, 2014 12:01 AM ET

U.S. renters paid $441 billion for apartments and houses this year, a $20.6 billion increase, as fewer Americans owned their homes and landlords with tight inventories raised leasing charges, Zillow Inc. (Z) said today.

The number of rental households grew by 2 percent, or 770,000, nationally during 2014, according to the Seattle-based real estate information service. In the New York metropolitan area, the largest U.S. housing market, the number of rental residences expanded by 63,000 to 3.4 million, with tenants spending a total of $50 billion for shelter.

http://www.bloomberg.com/…/housing-costs-for-renters-rose-by-20-6-billion-this-year.html - 148k -

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-01 13:14:36

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 09:53:56

Housing Costs for Renters Rose by $20.6 Billion This Year
bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-30/housing-costs-for-renters-rose-by-20-6-billion-this-year.html

 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
Comment by real journalists
2015-01-01 16:10:14

Warmists gonna warm, Dannyboy

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 11:30:54

Debtors prisons are making a come-back as Obama’s economic “recovery” enriches the .1% while pauperizing the working poor and those already on the margins.

http://www.shtfplan.com/commodities/specter-of-debtors-prisons-looms-over-americans-who-just-cant-pay-you-cant-squeeze-blood-from-a-turnip_12302014

 
Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 13:42:00

Since inflation is not included in the figure you posted, it is pretty much useless for drawing whatever conclusion you meant to be drawn.

Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 14:59:21

nominal growth is used in the GDP estimates

nominal growth = real growth + inflation

You can still have GDP growth even though there is no real growth

How do you inflate your way out of debt?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 17:00:08

As I recall, 1998 was just before gold plummeted to $300/oz.

Maybe this time is different?

Gold Futures Fall, Capping a Second Year of Losses
By Joe Deaux, Glenys Sim, Jasmine Ng and Whitney McFerron
Dec 31, 2014 11:34 AM PT

For the first time since 1998, gold posted back-to-back yearly declines.

The metal fell today as the dollar gained, reducing the appeal for bullion as an alternative asset. Bullion closed down 1.5 percent for 2014, compared with an average annual move of 12 percent in the past 14 years. Prices touched a four-year low last month as equities rallied and investors speculated that the Federal Reserve is preparing to raise interest rates.

“Gold has had several problems,” George Gero, a precious metals strategist at RBC Capital Markets in New York, said in a telephone interview. “The improving U.S. economy, the continued better labor picture, the lack of inflation, very strong stocks and the very strong dollar weighed on gold this year.”

Gold futures for February delivery fell 1.4 percent to settle at $1,184.10 an ounce at 1:53 p.m. an ounce on the Comex in New York. The metal rose 1.6 percent yesterday and briefly erased declines for the year.

Investors cut holdings in the biggest exchange-traded product backed by bullion by 11 percent this year, after a 41 percent reduction in 2013. Assets in the SPDR Gold Trust dropped 0.2 percent yesterday to 710.81 metric tons, the lowest since September 2008, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 12:22:32

The Top Ten Political Fictions of 2014
American Thinker | 01/01/2015 | By Marguerite Creel

1. The border is less porous than it’s been any time since the 1970s. — President Barack Obama, Business Roundtable, December 3, 2014

According to Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, illegal immigration on the southwestern American border actually rose 14 percent over the prior year, marking the third straight annual increase. In response, Medicare budgets, along with local medical services budgets, have been bankrupted. K-12 resources were stretched and food bank stores were depleted as states attempted to somehow address the monthly incursions of thousands of illegal aliens crossing the border.

2. The Common Core State Standards are not a curriculum or set of lesson plans. — U.S. Department of Education Website

3. The EPA proposed a common-sense plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants. — The White House Website

The EPA rules proposed on June 2, 2014, actually had ten states scrambling to address the phony climate-change crisis through emissions reduction goals of 40 percent or more by 2030. Onerously unconstitutional and unnecessary goals were designated by means of yet another arbitrary, business-oppressing equation: dividing CO2 emissions [in pounds] by the amount of electricity generated [in megawatt hours]. Blanket authority seized under the Clean Air Act works to dramatically reduce jobs and increase private and public sector costs; ultimately leading to homeowners being slapped in the face with what President Obama presciently termed “necessarily skyrocketing” electricity rates in 2015 and beyond.

4. IRS systems and processes to support enrollment in the health care marketplaces were launched on schedule and continue to work as planned. — IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, House Ways & Means Testimony, September 10, 2014

5. We are obligated to protect Muslims from global warming. — Secretary of State John Kerry, C-SPAN, posted September 3, 2014

Wasting billions of U.S. dollars by participating in the climate-change hoax was apparently not enough for cabinet members. By rhetorically doubling down in a truly global sense, extra billions will wantonly disappear into the Middle East conflagration. Actual recipients of these taxpayer dollars will forever remain unknown, serving to further enhance the current administration’s well-earned moniker of ‘least transparent’ administration ever. Be it scientific promotion at NASA or infrastructure building by the Defense Department, the ever more expensive outreach to Muslim communities is the issue de jour to subvert established and potentially advantageous missions of U.S. global agencies.

6. Since I have come into office, there’s almost no economic metric by which you couldn’t say that the U.S. economy is better and that the corporate bottom lines are better. — President Barack Obama, Economist Interview, August 2, 2014

7. As Commander-in-Chief, my highest priority is the security of the American people. — President Barack Obama, Public Statement on ISIL, September 10, 2014

The president talked a big game, but where was any impactful — or at a minimum insightful — response to the murder of American citizens in Syria, Libya, and Yemen? How did the authorization of 68,000 ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ cards for criminal illegal aliens in 2013 keep the United States safe in 2014? Was the unilateral release of five murderous anti-American Guantanamo Bay Taliban detainees for one army sergeant the action of an administration that values American security? Are there any Americans, much less a majority, convinced that the risk of a national outbreak of a deadly infectious disease was worth sending thousands of American troops to monitor Ebola in Liberia?

8. We’re Republicans. We actually think you should read the bill before you vote on it. — Speaker of the House John Boehner, AEI Presentation, September 18, 2014

9. The Diversity Visa (DV) program offers up to 50,000 visas annually to people who wish to immigrate to the United States. — Consulate General of the United States Website

10. The Justice Department’s investigation into the shooting of Michael Brown remains ongoing. — Attorney General Eric Holder, Ferguson Grand Jury Press Statement, November 24, 2014

Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-01 14:25:04

According to Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times, illegal immigration on the southwestern American border actually rose 14 percent over the prior year, marking the third straight annual increase. In response, Medicare budgets, along with local medical services budgets, have been bankrupted.

Is the level of illegal immigration the correct way to measure the porosity of the border? And why is Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times being quoted? How does he get his statistics?

And how does illegal immigration affect Medicare, which primarily serves people over the age of 65?

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 12:29:44

The obama recovery is just getting going kiddies!

Keep voting democrat!

—————————

More millennials missing out on recovery, living with parents
the hill | 12/30/14 | Kevin Cirilli

A Congressional report released Tuesday found that millennials are not feeling the impacts of the economic recovery.

The Joint Economic Committee’s report added to what’s become a long list of economic data showing that millennials are delaying major life decisions such as buying a home and getting married.

In 2003, nearly 40 percent of Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 headed a household. In 2013, the rate declined to 37.2 percent.

Meanwhile, the percentage of millennials living with their parents has increased from 11 percent before the recession to 14 percent,

Comment by Avocado
2015-01-01 15:26:22

2fruit - we know you dont even own a passport. You are just a FOX-DROID.

Jeb 2016! two more Bushes and all together they might see the same amount of net jobs created with O as POTUS.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 16:10:04

Got your green shirt on Lolacado?

 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2015-01-01 12:46:51

Beirut’s rebuilt downtown lacking
Not so long ago, the historic downtown of Beirut was a wasteland of scorched buildings and rubble. Now it’s a wasteland of unoccupied plush apartments and posh cafes, refurbished Ottoman-era buildings and boutiques by Burberry and Versace.
“Downtown should have soul. It should be alive,” said Mona Hallak, an architect and historical-preservation activist. “But what we have is a culture-free ghost town for the rich.”
The average Lebanese worker earns less than $10,000 a year and can’t afford the new multimillion-dollar residences or the swank offerings from the boutiques of Ermenegildo Zegna or Swarovski.
“This isn’t a downtown. It’s an investment for wealthy people,” said Mohamad Hashash, a 38-year-old psychiatrist.
The area just needs more time to grow, said Abed Halbaoui, a 66-year-old engineer who bought a three-bedroom apartment in the area in 2009. “You can’t have a vibrant downtown in just a couple of years. Something like this takes a hundred years to develop,” he said.
His property has been a good financial investment. But his family refuses to move in, preferring the security of their other home in Dubai.
Back at the Grand Café, the manager was too concerned over how to pay the restaurant’s $25,000 monthly rent to ponder how the reconstruction project should have gone differently. With so few customers, he said, it was not clear whether the restaurant can remain solvent.
“It’s beautiful here,” he said. “But is this business affordable? I don’t know.”

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-01 13:52:27

Beruit was called the “Paris of the east” when it was a majority Christian city. After horded of muslims, a brutal civil war with muslims and this is what you get…

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 15:09:21

While Muslims of antiquity prospered, their modern descendants seem to favor a diet of economic privation. What is up with that?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 16:47:09

The nihilistic destruction that seems to follow in the wake of Islamists is the greatest argument against the creed itself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2015-01-01 13:01:11

The Tragedy of the American Military (lengthy article)
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/12/the-tragedy-of-the-american-military/383516/

Scroll down quickly for graphics and photos.

Comment by real journalists
2015-01-01 16:15:01

They attacked us on 9/11 because they hate our freedoms

We have to fight them over there so we won’t have to fight them over here

These colors don’t run

Freedom isn’t free

Power of pride

Let’s roll

Mission accomplished

Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-02 00:50:44

“Let’s roll”

Those guys had more courage in a single cell than most of us have in our whole bodies.

#Let’sRoll

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 16:45:21

Thanks for posting. James Fallows is one of the most astute military-interest observers and commentators out there, and its a shame that so few Americans refuse to take the time to really read and consider articles such as this. Instead, ‘Muricans blithely say “we support our troops” without knowing or caring about the military as an institution.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 18:03:12

“When markets reach their current nose bleed levels there are no shorts left; and it is also likely that the day trading gamblers have become increasingly lax about absorbing the cost of even cheap “downside insurance” (i.e. puts on the S&P 500). That is, they are “long” and “unprotected”.”

 
 
Comment by spook
2015-01-01 16:52:55

The F-22 Craptor

Comment by rms
2015-01-01 22:19:24

Someone could attend college for that f-22 hourly cost. Insane!

Comment by reedalberger
2015-01-02 00:52:43

National defense is in the constitution. Paying for college is not.

#YouCan’tAttendCollegeIfYou’reDead

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 15:02:42

cnbc ratings are still cratering 6 years into the recovery. Why aren’t people watching anymore? Are they tired of BS? Mom an pop use to get their stock picks from the show.

Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 17:06:30

I would expect CNBC, MSNBC, FOX all to crater on their ratings. They only cheerlead for the State.

More and more people are tired of the “progressive” and neo conservative tax-mongering, war mongering, police state mongering and get alternative information from the anarchic internet sites.

HBB, ZeroHedge, Charles Hugh Smith, Lew Rockwell, Ron Paul - these sites present what really matters to Main Street and what threats are out there to Main Street.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:19:36

“Given that government spending cannot help the real economy, can it help the specific indicator called GDP? Yes it can. Since GDP is mostly a measure of inflation, if banks are willing to lend and borrowers are willing to borrow, then the newly created money that the government is spending will make its way through the economy. As banks lend the new money once they receive it, the money multiplier will kick in and the money supply will increase, which will raise GDP.”

Its all about nominal growth

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 18:38:14

+ 1000. Anyone still getting their news from or supporting these corporate-statist MSM propaganda outlets with their hard-earned money is a died-in-the-wool sheep.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 16:21:21

Just did my year end portfolio performance review. My net worth gained by 2.9% in 2014. It makes sense since my income was lower than the previous year and I sold stocks all during the year. That was probably my slowest rate gain in six years. Moved a lot of money to cash and short term and intermediate term bonds that could take me to full retirement in 2026 without tapping my tax deferred retirement plans. But of course the yields on those are low.

The physical precious metals will do for protecting me from hyperYellenism.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 16:34:02

nice dude

I think they should means test you to see if you need ss.

Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 17:19:35

They probably will means test me and others. But what if a huge part of my wealth is hidden?

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:22:24

“The most important economic and financial indicator in today’s inflationary world is money supply. Trying to anticipate stock-market and GDP movements by analyzing traditional economic and financial indicators can lead to incorrect forecasts. To rely on these “fundamentals” is to largely ignore the specific economic forces that most significantly affect those same fundamentals — most notably the changes in the money supply. Therefore, following monetary indicators would be the best insight into future stock prices and GDP growth.”

you dont deserve a ss check if you have a net worth > 1million us dollars

It shall be donated to the food stamp fund so people can eat.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-01 19:25:28

you dont deserve a ss check if you have a net worth > 1million us dollars

SS isn’t welfare; it is a state-sponsored old-age & disability pension system.

Those trying to treat it as though it were welfare, by proposing means testing, are merely trying to turn it into something that has less public support and is thus easier to attack.

 
Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 19:27:51

Prime. Exactly. It is MY money I paid into SS. I will be knocking on the door in 11 and a half years at the SS office, rich or not, expecting to get my money back.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-01 23:00:25

When OASDI was created, Roosevelt and company deliberately avoided turning it into a welfare program by including the wealthy under its scope. Once folks like Bill are prevented from getting there money back, you can bet your bottom dollar that further support for the program will be limited to fringe liberal extremists.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-01 16:40:34

I breathlessly await each year-end recap of your personal financial situation, Bill.

Comment by Bill, Just South of Irvine
2015-01-01 16:48:25

So glad RKH.

Now either stop griping or tune me out with your Joshua Tree.

PLEASE

Comment by spook
2015-01-01 16:56:13

Wonder Woman has an invisible plane; but she’s not invisible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-01-01 17:26:04

I am glad about that.

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:32:21

hey dan, Happy new year!

Do u think we are gonna see a lot of bankruptcies out of this low oil price? Or do you think some of these outfits will keep drilling and take the loss for awhile in hopes of a near turn turn around? I guess some revenue is better than none if you think prices will rebound.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:16:50

“One effect of the new money flowing disproportionately into asset prices is that the Fed cannot “grow the economy” as much as it used to, since more of the new money created in the banking system flows into asset prices rather than into GDP. Since it is commonly thought that creating money is necessary for a growing economy, and since it is believed that the Fed creates real demand (instead of only monetary demand), the Fed pumps more and more money into the economy in order to “grow it.”

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-01 17:31:33

But it doesn’t seem to be working. Housing prices and commodity prices are falling.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:47:37

“In fact, the only real force that ultimately makes the stock market or any market rise (and, to a large extent, fall) over the longer term is simply changes in the quantity of money and the volume of spending in the economy. Stocks rise when there is inflation of the money supply (i.e., more money in the economy and in the markets). This truth has many consequences that should be considered.”

 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:54:40

“A third of Britain’s listed oil and gas companies are in danger of running out of working capital and even going bankrupt amid a slump in the value of crude, according to new research.”

Are any of you guys willing to may more for a house so a broker doesn’t go under?

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 17:58:13

“The dips have gotten shallower and shallower as ZIRP and other pro-risk central bank policies have eroded the market’s natural defenses against excessive speculation.”

BTFD!

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-01 18:24:35

“They were tired of trying to guess the bottom of the market and missing. We don’t have a bottom yet and there’s still a ways to go.”

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 19:27:33

Feds Sent Almost As Much Military Hardware to Local Cops After Ferguson Protests As They Did Before, Despite Lip Service from Obama

by Ed Krayewski | Reason | January 1, 2015

The police response to protests in Ferguso over the fatal police shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown brought the issue of militarized police into the forefront of national dialogue. The fight against police militarization became a sort of culture war thing. Eager to show that he sympathized with protesters and to distance himself from the actions and consequences of a federal government he’s indisputably at the head of, President Obama ordered a review of the Pentagon’s 1033 program, under which military surplus is sent to local law enforcement. Demilitarizing our cities and communities was always going to be an uphill battle; the police didn’t militarize of their own accord, the years-long process would be impossible without a level of support not just from politicians but voters too.

Now the Washington Times reports on just how little the president’s review and protests in Ferguson changed the facts on the ground:

A Washington Times analysis of the first three months after the riots shows the program remains popular with law enforcement agencies throughout the country, though there have been some changes in the types of equipment that are now being offered.

The 3,879 rifles the Pentagon shipped was an astronomical increase over the dozen rifles shipped during the same three-month period in 2013, with several police agencies taking delivery of hundreds of rifles soon after the Ferguson riots.

Armored vehicles, which drew particular scrutiny in the riots in Ferguson and other cities, were less popular in the aftermath. The Pentagon shipped just 11 mine-resistant vehicles, or MRAPs, from Aug. 15 through Nov. 14, compared to nearly 180 in the same time period a year earlier.

Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-01 20:56:06

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-01 19:27:33

Feds Sent Almost As Much Military Hardware to Local Cops After Ferguson Protests As They Did Before, Despite Lip Service from Obama
reason.com/blog/2014/12/31/feds-sent-almost-as-much-military-hardwa

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-02 00:21:36

Will China bulls sh!t brics if it turns out their economy is actually contracting?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-02 00:26:56

Is economic growth driven by command-and-control Keynesian stimulus measures sustainable?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-02 00:27:56

International Business
China’s Economy Faces Sluggish Start for New Year
By REUTERS
JAN. 1, 2015

BEIJING — After a rough 2014, China, the world’s second-largest economy, appeared to be starting the new year on a weak note, reinforcing expectations that Beijing will roll out more stimulus measures to avert a slowdown that could cause job losses and debt default.

China’s factory activity is sputtering, underlining the challenges facing the country’s manufacturers as they fight rising costs and softening demand in a cooling economy. In addition, a property slump is expected to last well into 2015, companies continue to struggle to pay off debt, and export demand may remain erratic, leaving the services sector as China’s lone economic bright spot.

The nation’s official purchasing managers index slipped to 50.1 in December from 50.3 in November, a government report showed on Thursday — its lowest level of the year, clinging just above the 50-point level that separates growth from contraction on a monthly basis.

“This indicates that industrial growth is still in a downward trend, but the pace is slowing,” Zhang Liqun, an economist at the Development Research Center, said in a statement accompanying the report.

A similar private survey on Wednesday showed that activity in December shrank for the first time in seven months. That survey focused on smaller companies, which are under greater strains.

Many analysts expect economic growth in the fourth quarter to slow only marginally from 7.3 percent in the third quarter, though weak data suggest that may be too optimistic. If full-year growth is less than the government’s 7.5 percent target, it would be the weakest expansion in 24 years.

Economists who advise the government have recommended that China lower its growth target to around 7 percent in 2015.

 
 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-01-02 00:31:04

Economics
December 29, 2014
The Return of the Eurozone Crisis Might Be the Top Economic Story of 2015
By Danny Vinik

On Monday, Greek lawmakers failed to elect a president in a third and final parliamentary vote that dissolves the current government and sets up snap elections in late January. The outcome, while not unexpected, has reignited worries that domestic political issues in Europe could set off a larger crisis and pose a major risk to the global economy.

The greatest fear is that the weak European economy, which is teetering on the edge of another recession, will cause a backlash among domestic voters and lead extreme parties to major political victories. Last May, such parties across Europe gained seats in European parliamentary elections. In France, the anti-euro National Front party won the national vote for the first time. The U.K. Independence Party topped polls in the United Kingdom as well. And in Greece, the far-left Syriza party came in first with 27 percent of the vote.

Those votes weren’t that meaningful since the center-right and center-left blocs still retained enough members to form a governing coalition. But if the extreme political parties took control of government in individual Eurozone countries, it could pose a major risk to the entire European project—and that’s exactly what could happen in Greece with Syriza next year.

“The thing I worry most about isn’t so much Greece but whether what’s happening in Greece affects the politics in the rest of Europe,” said Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s. “If what’s happening in Greece is a catalyst for broader political change around Europe, I think that’s the real issue.”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post