January 31, 2015

Bits Bucket for January 31, 2015

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

203 Comments »

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 05:51:40

“Let the American people go into their debt-funding schemes and banking systems, and from that hour their boasted independence will be a mere phantom.” - William Pitt

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 07:39:36

Slavery, 21st Century style…

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 07:44:04

… at which the slave owns himself.

But what the slave produces still ends up in the clutches of the slavemaster.

It ain’t a perfect system yet, but it’s gettin’ close.

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 08:04:46

Slave owns himself plus house he can’t afford, bought with pther people’s money.

Bank owns claim to share of slave’s future earnings stream plus federal guarantee of loan principle in case of default.

Employer owns submissive slave who will go to great lengths to maintain ability to make debt payments.

State owns a stream of future tax payments on real estate assets, regardless of whichever particular slaves happen to own them.

This sounds pretty close to a banker’s paradise.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 08:08:45

“This sounds pretty close to a banker’s paradise.”

Bahahaha … first, tell ‘em they’re smart. Then present them with a dotted line.

Result: A banker’s paradise.

Dumb ‘em down, and prosper.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:12:11

At what point between 0% ans 100% taxation do you become a slave?

Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:21:45

At what point between 0% ans 100% taxation do you become a slave?
A related question is, at what point short of insolvency do you become a debt slave?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 08:25:22

There’s no law that says you have to work if you don’t like to pay income tax.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:28:25

There’s no law that says you have to work if you don’t like to pay income tax.
I believe certain penalties take effect &/or sanctions taken, if the gubmint believes you owe them income tax, whether or not you happen to be working at the time such a debt is discovered, &/or whether or not you actually owe them anything.

 
Comment by rms
2015-01-31 08:43:50

And you *must* buy health insurance, IIRC.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:37:28

Do the 38% of the labor force with no jobs or incomes still have to buy health insurance?

Labor Force Participation Rate Hits Bottom Despite Lower Unemployment Role
Morris Beschloss, Special to The Desert Sun 3:46 p.m. PST January 30, 2015

For those not familiar with the Labor Department’s monthly reports, the December low 5.6% unemployment rate projects goods news, along with the fact that 2014 job creation numbers hit the highest in a decade, while October and November numbers were revised upward.

But, analytically speaking, the bigger picture is much more somber, starting with the labor force participation rate that plummeted to below 62%, the worst number ever since this statistic became available decades ago. This index makes the most sense, since it indicates the percentage of those employed, from a viable labor pool of 140 million, who are ready, willing, and able to work.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-31 10:23:09

That 62% includes unemployed people looking for work, so the number without a job is higher than 38%. But it also includes everyone over the age of 16, so many of them are senior citizens who have Medicare.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 10:24:06

Wasn’t the labor participation rate around 75% in the last Great Depression?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-31 11:18:20

I think one problem with the labor force participation rate is that it measures people 16 years old and up. I don’t think young people work as much as they used to, regardless of the current economic conditions. It should probably be re-calibrated to 18 and up.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 11:24:45

“…includes everyone over the age of 16,…”

So my retired 85 year old parents are part of the 38%+ of the workforce which is neither unemployed nor discouraged?

I’d like to see your sources on that…

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-01-31 11:52:34

Wasn’t the labor participation rate around 75% in the last Great Depression?

Yes—but I don’t think that they counted women as part of the labor force back then.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:44:46

At what point between 0% ans 100% taxation do you become a slave

Its not about taxation 2-fruit its about how it is spent…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:48:42

Becauae government knows best!

May your chains rest lightly upon you.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 10:25:06

Some might say it’s about representation.

 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2015-01-31 10:48:41

Som might just pitch another tantrum and fling their soiled depends.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2015-01-31 09:59:06

It’s quite remarkable. The mortgage finance system is fully nationalized. If there was profit in the system which the government and Wall Street put together around the Great Depression,there would be some private participation in that market. But there is not (approaching zero for new mortgages over these past 7 years). Which is why virtually all new mortgages for the past 7 years have been purchased only by the government.

Market forces are driven by the search for value. Government printing money to give to the architects of the previously imploded financial system, and explicitly backstopping that system, to continue the illusion that system is still generating value, does not seem like a prescription for long-term economic vitality. It is certainly generating value for a small group of well-connected companies by providing them with non-debauched currency.

You want to enforce market discipline and stop debt bubbles? You make sure the architects of any shenanigans - which selling junk mortgages certainly was - are held to account for their actions. And you sure as heck don’t get the government involved in insuring private debt.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 06:11:05

Sharyl Attkisson: If You Cross Obama Admin They Will Treat You Like “Enemies Of The State”

Former CBS investigative correspondent testifies at the confirmation hearing for Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch

by Real Clear Politics | January 31, 2015

SHARYL ATTKISSON: In 2013, Reporters Without Borders downgraded America’s standing in the global free press rankings, rating the Obama administration as worse than Bush’s. It matters not that when caught the government promises to dial back or that [FOX News'] James Rosen gets an apology. The message has already been received. If you cross this administration with perfectly accurate reporting they don’t like, you will be attacked and punished. You and your sources may be subjected to the kind of surveillance devised for enemies of the state.

For much of history, the United States has held itself out as a model of freedom, democracy, and open accountable government. Freedoms of expression and association are of course protected by the constitution. Today those freedoms are under assault due to government policies of secrecy, leak prevention, and officials contact with the media, combined with large scale surveillance programs. The nominee if confirmed should chart a new path and reject the damaging policies and practices that have been used by others in the past. If we aren’t grave enough to confront these concerns, it could do serious long-term damage to a supposedly free press. Thank you.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 07:21:17

“The nominee if confirmed should chart a new path and reject the damaging policies and practices that have been used by others in the past.”

Bahahahahahaha … IOW the nominee should take a different path from the path the nominator wants him to take, and if this were the case then the person would never be nominated in the first place.

Dream on.

 
Comment by real journalists
2015-01-31 07:35:08

Andrew Breitbart was murdered by the Obama administration

And Sharyl Attkisson is next

Forward

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 07:43:45

What politician running for CIC would willingly give up media control? Makes no sense. And the genie is out of the bottle.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 06:13:57

“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.”

~ Josiah Stamp – Bank of England Chairman, 1920s

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 06:18:53

Housing is cratering once again.

 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 06:31:09

anyone looking to offload some overpriced assets on some greater fools this month?

I’m trying to raise capital to pay for some health insurance.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 08:12:40

HELOC’d yourself into a corner debt donkey?

 
Comment by rms
2015-01-31 08:22:02

“I’m trying to raise capital to pay for some health insurance.”

Betcha a lending program exists. :)

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 08:47:12

“Betcha a lending program exists.”

Yes, indeedy, and along with it comes a free cup of coffee.

 
Comment by oxide
2015-01-31 15:36:05

“lending program”

Technically, yes, from China.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 06:37:12

Homeschooled children seized by authorities still in state custody

Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com) Tuesday, January 20, 2015

What began as an investigation ignited by an anonymous report turned into a nightmare for an Arkansas homeschooling couple and seven of their children last week – and it’s not over yet.

A Closer LookArkansas sheriff’s deputies in Garland County have “stolen” seven homeschoolers from their parents in a home raid spurred by an anonymous caller who told authorities the family’s house contained a “poisonous substance” — which turned out to be a mineral supplement/water purifier that isn’t FDA-approved. It’s been more than a week since the officers and the Department of Human Services (DHS) seized the seven homeschoolers. They remain in state custody.

False accusers protected — not families

The ludicrous nature of the removal of her children from her home was addressed by Michelle Stanley, who emphasized that federal authorities admitted the call could have been from someone intending to cause her family harm.

“We asked who made the charge and if anyone could just make any accusation and they have to act on the call regardless of its validity,” Michelle Stanley noted in her email after the incident. “They said it could be a hateful neighbor, a prank caller, someone with malicious intent and they still would have to act on the call.”

She also stressed that the government puts an emphasis on protecting the anonymity of the person making the complaint.

“The call was anonymous and therefore the caller was protected while all our rights were taken away,” Michelle Stanley continued.

Michelle Stanley, the mother of the seven children, is still in shock that the police and DHS have gotten away with abducting her children — taking them into custody under what she calls false pretenses.

“The DHS has come and stolen our kids from us under the guise of ‘protecting our children,” Stanley wrote in an email shortly after her home was raided by police and the DHS, according to Health Impact News.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/…schooled-children-seized-by-authorities-still-in-state-custody - 79k -

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 06:47:11

“‘The call was anonymous and therefore the caller was protected while all our rights were taken away,’ Michelle Stanley continued.”

I like it. Just think of the power, just think of what one can do with just one phone call.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2015-01-31 06:59:51

Bahahahahaha … is somebody hassling you? Maybe not paying to you what they owe?

Don’t bother to take direct action against them, set it up so the legal authorities will do the dirty deed for you.

Remember, the DHS, and the police and all the others, they have missions to fulfill, so your job is to give them some.

It’s a win-win.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:43:32

The East German Stasi and Pol Pot’s child spies operated in similar fashion.

 
 
Comment by Skroodle
2015-01-31 09:06:29

Link has been removed…fake story??

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-31 11:03:52

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 06:37:12

Homeschooled children seized by authorities still in state custody
onenewsnow.com/culture/2015/01/20/homeschooled-children-seized-by-authorities-still-in-state-custody#.VM0YusaKqPU

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 06:59:15

U.S. Homeownership Rate Falls to a 20-Year Low

Many would-be buyers stayed on the sidelines, giving the rental market a boost

by Bloomberg Business | January 30, 2015

The U.S. homeownership rate fell to the lowest in more than two decades in the fourth quarter as many would-be buyers stayed on the sidelines, giving the rental market a boost.

The share of Americans who own their homes was 64 percent in the fourth quarter, down from 64.4 percent in the previous three months, the Census Bureau said in a report. The rate was at the lowest since the second quarter of 1994, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Rising prices and a tight supply of lower-end listings have put homes out of reach for some entry-level buyers, who also face strict mortgage standards. The share of U.S. homebuyers making their first purchase dropped in 2014 to the lowest level in almost three decades, the National Association of Realtors reported last week.

“The improving economy helps, though affordability is a growing challenge,” Jed Kolko, chief economist for San Francisco-based Trulia Inc., said in an interview Wednesday. “I suspect we’re closer to the bottom” of the ownership declines.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 07:36:41

“The Tulip Lunacy in the Bond market is just off the charts stupidity at its finest, go ahead and buy the 2-Year Bond this upcoming week, I am sure this Bond will be good in four months when the Fed hikes rates 25 basis points, maybe if you are lucky there is a greater fool than you, but from the stampede that is sure to follow on the exit of this trade at these prices in the bond markets, you better be first!”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-30/bond-market-has-reached-tulip-bubble-proportions

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 07:51:00

I took a few chips off the table early last week from the bond market allocation in my investment portfolio. Missed the further valuation spike later in the week. Maybe the bond market can keep plumbing record low yields, and maybe not.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 07:58:15

Please don’t be a bagholder this time around.

It seems uncle fed has more control over the fed funds rate and the discount rate which are shorter term.

If the yield on a 30 year bond is collapsing what is that saying about the economy?

Sure if you get caught in a 2 year deal and rates go up you can ride it out to maturity.

With a 30 year if you get upside down your going to have to take a haircut if you need liquidity or wait a hell of a long time to get out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 08:14:42

I don’t currently own any thirty-year Treasurys. You’d need brass balls or an empty skull to buy now.

Nonetheless, I see no obvious reason for long-term yields to soon increase. Even if the Fed raised short rates by midyear, the long end of the yield curve could stay put or even decline.

And the Fed has the option to punt yet again on rate hikes, which could trigger another rally in long-term Treasurys.

 
Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:23:24

I don’t currently own any thirty-year Treasurys. You’d need brass balls or an empty skull to buy now.
Somebody seems to be buying those Treasurys. Who are they and what are they up to?

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 08:26:22

I think long term bond funds such as VWESX are slam dunks. Mixed with municipals and savings bonds, the income is very comfy. Wish I had three times the principle, then I would rent a three bedroom house in Rancho Santa Margarita and rent a car 52 weeks of the year.

This “ownership” society is way overrated.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 08:29:25

I suspect it is central banks, pension funds and other financial entities with tremendous capital reserves; can’t imagine individual investors playing much of a role unless through mutual funds.

 
Comment by Patrick
2015-01-31 11:30:21

Could be speculators betting on negative rates.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:01:31

US T’s rates are impacted by all the worlds economies…They FED may raise by .25 basis points but as long as the other major economies are at negative or close to negative rates our bonds will continue to be attractive and remember we are also a flight to safety play…We could see the 10 year not move at all even in the face of a bump-up from the FED…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 08:05:35

with inflation factored in the yields are negative. I think some countries buy them cause they have to with their currency peg.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2015-01-31 07:48:19

The U.S. homeownership rate fell to the lowest in more than two decades in the fourth quarter as many Greatest Generation widows died in their paid-off 1950’s ranch houses and would-be underemployed Millenial buyers stayed on the sidelines waiting around for Boomers to bequeath them their steady jobs, giving the urban air-box rental market a boost.”

FIFY

Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:29:47

The U.S. homeownership rate fell to the lowest in more than two decades ??

And what about the three decades before that ?? Much adduce about nothing…Some here (one in particular) point to the falling home ownership rate as some apocalypse event…Its BS as the numbers show below…

Is there a mind set change in the younger generations desire to purchase…Sure…For many reasons…Will they remain that way long term, we shall see…But any offering that they will is just pure speculation…

When we see the ownership rate crash through the 60% barrier then we may want to claim a major shift in our societies desire to own…

Year Home ownership rate

1960 62.1
1961 62.4
1962 63.0
1963 63.1
1964 63.1
1965 63.3
1966 63.4
1967 63.6
1968 63.9
1969 64.3
1970 64.2
1971 64.2
1972 64.4
1973 64.5
1974 64.6
1975 64.6
1976 64.7
1977 64.8
1978 65.0
1979 65.6
1980 65.6
1981 65.4
1982 64.8
1983 64.6
1984 64.5
1985 63.9
1986 63.8
1987 64.0
1988 63.8
1989 63.9
1990 63.9
1991 64.1
1992 64.1
1993 64.0
1994 64.0
1995 64.7
1996 65.4
1997 65.7
1998 66.3
1999 66.8
2000 67.4
2001 67.8
2002 67.9
2003 68.3
2004 69.0
2005 68.9
2006 68.8
2007 68.1
2008 67.8
2009 67.4

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:42:07

The 64% homeownership rate at a near-50-year low is conspicuously similar to the 62% labor force participation rate, the lowest ever. I wonder if the employed share of the labor force might be correlated with the homeownership rate?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 10:46:45

The 64% homeownership rate at a near-50-year low ??

Well since it is basically a constant number over a 35 year period I hardly would call it a low…Like I said, if we move significantly below these numbers it may indicate a new paradigm in ownership rates…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 11:40:51

Dave — Point taken. The home ownership rate remained stable at levels from 63.0 to 66.0 from 1962-1997 = 36 years. It only increased above 66.0 during the Housing Bubble years, and now it is back in the normal range.

However, prices are not.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:48:32

However, prices are not ??

Which could be the reason we could go below the mean…We shall see…Trend line is heading down…

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 13:14:46

“claim a major shift in our societies desire to own…”

The houses are unaffordable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 08:34:58

I was going to have a weekend post on this, but I’m up against a 1099 deadline, so I say it here. If you had asked a financial pundit in the 80’s what these bond yields represented, he may have pondered, “global nuke warfare?”

What we are seeing is something that hasn’t existed in all the time since the Vikings made their way to Greenland. Bonds are a safe haven, it is said. Then we can conclude that never in history has there been more money looking for protection. But from what? Step back; we’ve had two bubbles since the turn of the century - stocks and housing. This eventually resulted in the largest money creation episode the central banks have ever done. And now those same two markets are at or near record highs. And don’t forget we’ve just witnessed a 15 year commodity cycle come unwound. There’s not going to be another Chinese growth explosion. That was a once in history event too.

Dang, this is a lot of one-off stuff we’re seeing here. What are bonds telling us? It could be nothing. With all the manipulation, perhaps it is to be expected and will play out with a whimper. But currencies are the largest market in the world. And bond yields are the price of that money. Taken together, what these prices mean isn’t clear right now, but the message couldn’t possibly be louder.

Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 08:42:37

See my late post yesterday in BB with a link to an article about people hoarding cash.

Hoard fiat, hoard precious metals bullion, hoard Bitcoin.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2015-01-31 16:04:13

ISTM to keeping both physical gold and bitcoin is internally contradictory. If we have an infrastructure collapse such that you actually need to use the hideable and movable aspects of physical, that same collapse will almost certainly break your block-chains.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:48:47

but the message couldn’t possibly be louder ??

The message is fear IMO….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 09:02:33

It isn’t universal fear. Yesterday people threw billions at a burger chain. These stock and bond markets are on two different pages and only one of them are right. Some house markets are priced to perfection too.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 09:25:04

Yeah…Good point Ben…But, these dudes are awash in money…They are looking everywhere to chase higher yield and, IMO, taking on huge risk…Burger Joint ?? Just what our struggling economy needs…Another Burger Joint…

Housing priced to perfection ?? In my area, its beyond perfection…Its a all out auction in many locations…Its quite unsettling really…

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 09:37:38

‘Where your boss will be come the revolution: ‘Boltholes with airstrips’ in New Zealand that are being bought by world’s super-rich who want a hideout in case of ‘civil uprising’

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:45:21

There are also the Keynesian beauty contest investors, who jump on bubbles while they are inflating and try to get off before they pop.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:46:00

Maybe the hedgies in their hidey-holes are forgetting New Zealand has its own 99% who will be just as screwed over and pissed off as the US and European counterparts.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:47:09

It seems like a whole slew of disparate asset classes can be “priced to perfection” when a tsunami tide of quantitative easing money floods in.

The naked swimmers flopping on the beach won’t be revealed until when and if the tsunami tide ever washes back to sea.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:43:48

“What we are seeing is something that hasn’t existed in all the time since the Vikings made their way to Greenland.”

Put that way, it is pretty shocking.

But it is hard to know how much of the plummeting yields is due to fundamentals versus quantitative easing, given how many central banks have jumped on the quantitative easing bandwagon.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 09:56:20

‘hard to know how much of the plummeting yields is due to fundamentals versus quantitative easing’

I agree. The various QE’s have clouded the picture.

 
Comment by Ella58
2015-01-31 12:49:59

And the rush to the (high risk) burger IPO in the midst of a (flight to safety) treasury run is not so counterintuitive either. Bonds = collateral = leverage = money/credit to pour into hot IPO.

At the same time, QE took bonds from the private sector, leading to a scarcity only half-remedied by reverse repos.

It’s now a vicious cycle. Yields are low, so investors have to lever up and pour into high-risk IPOs for alpha, to do this they compete for bonds to use as collateral, sending yields lower, and so on.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 13:12:55

I still like the name of the Chinese trust that defaulted. Credit Equals Gold No. 1. It about sums up the situation.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 13:59:05

I believe another way of interpreting that is; Credit is the center of everything.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 19:23:31

Say what you want about the Bond King’s investing prowess. His taste in architecture was pathetic.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 13:19:16

“…money looking for protection. But from what?”

Possibly from cascading defaults.

“What are bonds telling us?”

Possibly that it’s Deflation season.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 08:23:42

Most new construction in San Diego seems to be tract homes priced “from the $1 millions.” This must be targeted at all-cash foreign investors, as there is a shortage of homeless San Diego millionaires who want to own cookie cutter McMansions built on small parcels.

Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 09:20:28

Someone should come up with some kind of electronic material to put up over peoples windows so they can have ocean views and increase their property values.

It seems like north county is where all the action is at in san diego. Places like el cajon arent that appealing to foreign investors.

Whats the action like south toward chula vista and imperial beach?

I wondered into some neighborhood just to the east of downtown off hwy 94 once and it was a hellhole.Scary

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 09:48:09

Binoculars or telescopes might work well for the new $1m+ homes on the west slope of Black Mountain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by tresho
2015-02-01 15:59:11

Someone should come up with some kind of electronic material to put up over peoples windows so they can have ocean views and increase their property values.
Wide screen TV’s in lieu of windows?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 07:00:43

Does this have a bearing on these bond yields?

‘It has been common usage for months to say we have entered Cold War II. This is wrong for several reasons, and it is time we understand them.’

‘One, the thought gives surreptitious comfort, since the Cold War never came to blows. But to take such comfort now is to miss what is going on before our eyes. There is no argument for comfort or ease.’

‘Two, there can be no Cold War II because the Cold War as we knew it never ended. NATO’s eastward creep, Georgia in 2008, Ukraine now, the merciless, reckless sanctions—all that has changed since 1991 are tactics, not strategy. Which leads to point three.’

‘Three is that the object of the war I assert we are now waging is destruction. To put this precisely, Washington’s intent is not to destroy Russia: It is to destroy what we may as well call “Putin’s Russia.” The implications here should be evident. This is “regime change” on the grandest scale.’

‘We can now comprehend Washington’s logic—a perverse, almost diabolical logic, Strangelovian logic. In last week’s column I used the term “monomania,” single-minded obsession. I hesitated to keep it in—too strong, I worried—but there was no need. The policy cliques in Washington have no intention of desisting in this war until they win it. Recognize this and you will find the prospect of hot war staring you down.’

‘We can also understand the apparently nonsensical risks Washington is taking and forcing Europeans on the front lines to accept. Five thousand Ukrainians dead, the arming of hyper-nationalist Nazis, Russia provoked into full-frontal hostility, the E.U. economies at the precipice: All this amounts to the “small battlegrounds.” It goes down among the policy cliques as collateral damage and nothing more. I find no evidence of concern in Washington for any of it. This is what I mean by monomania.’

‘Third new apprehension: It is not merely unlikely that Vladimir Putin will not step back in Ukraine or buckle under the sanctions regime. It is impossible. Russians far afield from the Kremlin share the thought that they are in a war with Americans. The bitter truth, available to us as of these past weeks, is that they are right.’

‘Many readers make the argument—to say “accusation” is to enter into the nonsense—that this column propagates on Putin’s behalf. The thought (not really the word) misses the point entirely, as follows: In my read, the war we have entered upon brings into sharp focus the 21st century’s single most vital zone of conflict. This is the non-West’s historically unprecedented insistence that it is the equal of the West, that its values are as valid as the West’s, that the world is multiple now and that “to become modern” no longer means “to become Western.”

‘It is this the American elite thinks is worth a war.’

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:45:59

But not with their money or sons…

‘It is this the American elite thinks is worth a war.’

Comment by butters
2015-01-31 11:34:35

As long as plebs are signing up for their wars, why would they send their sons and daughters?

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 12:09:49

As long as plebs are signing up for their wars, why would they send their sons and daughters?

They are not in the Ukraine.

They have instituted a draft that is mostly ignored and pretty much the army goes around and throws young men into the backs of army trucks.

Desertions rates are pretty high.

If the Ukrainians don’t want to fight for these territories - why should we?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2015-01-31 13:15:18

“We have to fight them there so that we don’t have to have them here” and “they hate us for our freedoms.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:58:17

Does this have a bearing on these bond yields ??

Damm right it does….These type of events can spin out of control very quickly…Now we have Benjamin Netanyahu wanting to speak directly to congress…What do you think he has on his mind ?? I just hope level headed minds prevail…

Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 09:10:06

‘NATO said on Friday it hoped to open a training center in Georgia by the end of the year, signaling a strengthening of its relationship with the former Soviet republic that is likely to antagonize Russia.’

‘Georgia’s government has long hoped to join the military alliance. But Russia, which fought a 2008 war with Georgia over two Moscow-backed breakaway regions, has said such a move would threaten its security.’

‘The Kremlin last month accused NATO of turning another former Soviet state, Ukraine, into a “frontline of confrontation”, amidst the worst standoff between Moscow and the West since the Cold War.’

‘NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow said the new training center would be set up as part of a package of measures to boost Georgia’s defense capabilities agreed at a summit in September.’

Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 09:12:58

‘Greece’s new nationalist defense minister prompted Greece’s perennial rival Turkey to scramble jets on Friday, just days after he took office, by flying over uninhabited islets off the Turkish coast that nearly triggered a war in 1996.’

‘Turkish fighter jets entered Greek airspace and were intercepted by Greek jets as Defence Minister Panos Kammenos and military chiefs flew by helicopter to the islet of Imia to drop wreaths in memory of three Greek officers killed nearby in a helicopter crash 19 years ago, the Greek Defence Ministry said.’

‘Kammenos heads the small, right-wing, Eurosceptical Independent Greeks party, and the episode underlines the risk that its unlikely coalition with Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’s leftwing Syriza party, winner of last week’s election, will come under strain on issues not related to their shared desire to end Greece’s austerity program.’

‘Although they share opposition to the terms of Greece’s bailout from the European Union and International Monetary Fund, Syriza and the Independent Greeks stand far apart on issues ranging from religion to questions of national identity.’

‘Greece irritated some of its EU partners this week by seeming ambiguous about extending sanctions against Russia over Ukraine, before eventually smoothing ruffled feathers.’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 12:06:10

Ukraine had an elected government. Corrupt and pro-Russian but elected.

Through violence, intimidation and western support - that government was overthrown and an illegal government was put in power. But somehow that is a GOOD THING.

Crimea and eastern Ukraine through violence, intimidation and Russian support - overthrows the new Ukraine government in those areas. But somehow that is a BAD THING.

Leave them alone.

It is not worth WWIII

It is not worth billions in American taxpayer dollars

It is not worth one American soldier’s life.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-31 09:25:23

He spoke to Congress just a couple of years ago. He probably doesn’t have anything new to say.

Comment by SUGuy
2015-01-31 19:21:54

He is here to inform the US congress that the re-election checks will be there depending on their pro-Israel stances. imo

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-31 10:42:55

“NATO’s eastward creep” = countries on Russia’s borders desperately seeking NATO membership so they can escape their historic imperial bully. Ukraine shows us the value of that membership, as that non-NATO country gets ground to a pulp by Russia exerting “historic claims” and “protecting Russian minorities”.

Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 11:03:01

From the first link:

‘There is a destructive enemy in this struggle. The American press, the New York Times in particular, has no intention whatsoever of struggling against either power or forgetting. It fails more or less completely now to remember that it, too, is supposed to be a pole of power, a countervailing pole. And its effect upon us creates another crisis, as I read it. Never mind the manufacture of consent: We live amid the manufacture of ignorance, a worse condition.’

‘This ignorance is what is being done to us. It is essential, indeed, to the prosecution of the war as defined above.’

‘I came to this thought by way of a keyhole’s view of the larger phenomenon. The thread attaching to these columns has grown swiftly of late into a chaos of irrational nonsense when the words “Russia” or “Putin” come up in the copy. Name-calling suffices, the need for logical argument (always welcome) obviated.’

‘From the specific to the general in this case: This casting of critique and dissent as un-American—a deeply un-American notion, of course—is a danger paying-attention people can no longer ignore. Most important is the enabling of bad policy. We are getting ourselves in very bad trouble. Remember, the Cuban missile crisis materialized more or less overnight.’

‘More personally, do many readers remember what it was like to live through the McCarthyist 1950s? Very horrible. One could not breathe. Europe remains populated with the aging exiles from this period.’

‘My abiding concern here is the psychological violence this climate causes. Study the 1950s, or the period just before Teddy Roosevelt invaded Cuba and sent Admiral Dewey into Manila Bay. We are not far from either.’

‘Incessant red-baiting, incessant Russia-baiting, incessant Islamophobia, incessant what have you: The deafening noise of jingoism and contempt for others’ perspectives renders people unable to think. Such people are no longer self-governing. They are the powerless subjects of masters.’

Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-31 12:07:02

Here’s my problem: Putin himself says (as do many of his defenders) that Russia should be able to dominate any nearby country that they have historically dominated. I don’t think they should, nor apparently do most people in those countries. I think it’s disgusting that Putin is willing to invade and destroy parts of those countries, killing many innocent people, to grab what he sees as Russia’s historic share. It’s no surprise that those countries very much want membership in NATO. If I lived in one of those countries, I sure would, wouldn’t you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 13:06:46

‘wouldn’t you?’

I don’t even want the US to be part of NATO. This is the neocons and Hillary’s gang doing this. They don’t care about the US or Ukrainians or anything but their agendas. I don’t want anything to do with Putin or Russia. Let them sort out their problems. But it is interesting to note the US government has unilaterally claimed the right to kill anyone it wants half-way around the globe. No trial, no notice, no accountability. Is Russia doing that, or any other “enemy” of the neocons? heck, the US phonied up the Iraq war, killed hundreds of thousands, and created a failed state and jihadist playground. Same with Libya and Syria.

‘In 2006 Sidney Blumenthal noted the paper’s relevance to potential Israeli bombing of Syria and Iran, writing that “In order to try to understand the neoconservative road map, senior national security professionals have begun circulating among themselves” the Clean Break “neocon manifesto.”[9] Soon after “Taki” of The American Conservative wrote that:

‘…recently, Netanyahu suggested that President Bush had assured him Iran will be prevented from going nuclear. I take him at his word. Netanyahu seems to be the main mover in America’s official adoption of the 1996 white paper A Clean Break, authored by him and American fellow neocons, which aimed to aggressively remake the strategic environments of Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. As they say in boxing circles, three down, two to go.[10]‘

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-31 13:16:55

“I don’t even want the US to be part of NATO.”

But you don’t live in a country on the border of Russia. If you did, would you want your country to be a NATO member? I sure would, and apparently most people in those countries do too.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 19:02:13

To heck with these freeloading Europeans. We’ve been paying to protect them since when, the 1940’s? Oh sure, let’s protect a bunch more, when we’re broke and they spend 1% of GDP on some half-arse military. You can go on about how every wants in NATO, but how do you know? NATO is basically the armed forces for the globalist elite, hijacked by Hillary and the neocons. And I’m sick of paying for it.

http://images.politico.com/global/2012/11/27/121127_clinton_mccain_605.jpg

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 20:23:03

^There it is.

 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-01-31 12:33:50

Here’s a related excerpt from a fascinating article in the BBC about Russian military and political strategy:

How Russia outfoxes its enemies
By Lucy Ash
BBC News

“Peter Pomerantsev, who recently spent several years working on documentaries and reality shows for Russian TV, argues that Russian state media are not just distorting truth in Ukraine, they go much further, promoting a seductive nihilism.

“The Russian strategy, both at home and abroad, is to say there is no such thing as truth,” he says.

“I mean, you know, ‘The Americans are bad, we’re bad, and everyone’s bad, so what’s the big deal about us being a bit corrupt? You know our democracy’s a sham, their democracy’s a sham.’

“It’s a sort of cynicism that actually resonates very powerfully in the West nowadays with this lack of self-confidence after the Iraq War, after the financial crash - and that’s what the Russians are hoping for, just to take that cynicism and then use that in a military environment.”"

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31020283

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-01-31 16:41:15

It is the logic of a psychopath.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 19:28:34

‘More personally, do many readers remember what it was like to live through the McCarthyist 1950s? Very horrible. One could not breathe. Europe remains populated with the aging exiles from this period.’

Could these fine fishermen possibly have been involved in fanning the extremes red fear of the day?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by real journalists
2015-01-31 07:01:41

7:00 am local time in region viii, rolling in the backseat up westbound i-70 in three lanes of traffic

do -not- move here expecting to be some kind of weekend warrior, unless you like sitting in your clown car for hours every weekend

region viii

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 07:53:28

“unless you like sitting in your clown car for hours every weekend”

So 4 guys, 4 deer and 1 Mini Cooper were at a bonfire and…

Posted 4:49 pm, January 30, 2015, by Ashton Edwards,

ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. – Four men started out their night at a bonfire and ended it with an illegal 3 a.m. hunting joyride in a Mini Cooper… crammed inside the tiny car with four very large deer.

It’s the last thing you’d expect to find outside your rural home; a bright yellow Mini Cooper, shell casings and blood on the ground.

Neighbors heard gunshots and called 911.

Deputies arrived to find a Mini Cooper with fogged up windows; inside were four grown men and four very large dead deer.

Authorities said the two-door car had somehow stalled.

They discovered the driver had purposefully sped up to run over one of the deer and then got stuck on top of the buck and stalled.

Officials said the men told them they had partied that night, went on the joyride/hunt under the cover of darkness and then passed out.

Deputies found pot in the car and more than one reason to send two of them to jail.

Two of the men are expected in court in February.

MORE: Get the latest on this story from WKMG

ox13now.com/…/01/30/so-4-guys-4-deer-and-1-mini-cooper-were-at-a-bonfire-and/ - 147k -

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:14:41

Hold my beer and watch this alert!

Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:24:43

Hold my beer and watch this alert!
Beer is for wimps. Real men drink Tabasco straight out of the bottle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2015-01-31 11:15:20

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 07:53:28

So 4 guys, 4 deer and 1 Mini Cooper were at a bonfire and…
fox13now.com/2015/01/30/so-4-guys-4-deer-and-1-mini-cooper-were-at-a-bonfire-and/

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 15:12:42

I never heard any good stories that started out with “…After a night of moderate drinking….”

 
 
Comment by real journalists
2015-01-31 07:58:01

90 minutes to go 30 miles in ski traffic

This sh*t is so over

Forward

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 08:02:34

Look at the bright side.

Gas is cheap and your not in a car with 3 passed out buddies and 4 large dead deer.

Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:25:43

your not in a car with 3 passed out buddies and 4 large dead deer.
What makes you so sure of that?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 08:59:57

LOL…Phony…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 18:19:31

Holiday Road - Lindsey Buckingham - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8NyKfHUNeU - 315k -

 
 
 
Comment by frankie
2015-01-31 07:10:52

Mexican children cross Texas border to attend school

Febe Ara lives in one country but goes to school in another.

This 16-year-old girl begins her day in Ciudad Juarez, in northern Mexico, before crossing one of the most active international borders in order to study in El Paso, Texas.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-31051630

Genuine question does she have to be an American citizen to be able to do this?

Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 07:59:46

“Genuine question does she have to be an American citizen to be able to do this?”

Pelosi Says U.S. And Mexico Are One Nation: ‘A Community With A Border Going Through It’

by Gina Cassini | Top Right News
June 29, 2014

Nancy Pelosi made this clear with two statements on the border yesterday:

“We are all Americans — north and south in this hemisphere”

“This is a community, with a border going through it.”

 
Comment by Skroodle
2015-01-31 09:11:46

This has been going on for years.

The Texas Constitution allows for this.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 08:04:43

Forward

Illegal immigrants released from custody committed 1,000 new crimes

One thousand of the 36,000 illegal immigrant criminals the government released in 2013 have gone on to commit other crimes

by Stephen Dinan | The Washington Times | January 31, 2015

One thousand of the 36,000 illegal immigrant criminals the government released in 2013 have gone on to commit other crimes, including child sex abuse, hit-and-run and child cruelty, according to new data released Friday evening by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley.

The information, which the Homeland Security Department provided to Mr. Grassley, details all 1,000 convictions including dozens of drunk-driving convictions, drug offenses and weapons convictions. But the more serious crimes include domestic abuse, carjacking and aggravated assault.

One of the illegal immigrants, identified as No. 960, was subsequently convicted of inflicting injury on a domestic partner; child cruelty, with the possibility of injury or death; probation violations; speeding; driving without a license; and failing to appear for court.

“The Obama Administration claims that it is using ‘prosecutorial discretion’ to prioritize the removal of criminal aliens from this country. But this report shows the disturbing truth: 1,000 undocumented aliens previously convicted of crimes who the Administration released in 2013 have gone on to commit further crimes in our communities,” Mr. Grassley said.

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:27:56

36,000 new democrat voters…

 
Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:29:52

Mr. Grassley is not a real journalist, and his statements have no validity.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:18:25

Data from the article - remember, they are victims of a racist country.

From the article:

July 1997
The Boatengs arrived in the United States
DEBT: $0

1999
Purchased a used Toyota Corolla for $2,000
CARS: $2,000
DEBT: $2,000

May 2000
Took out a mortgage on a three-bedroom town home in Germantown.
CARS: $2,000
MORTGAGE: $128,900
DEBT: $130,900

2000
Purchased a new Nissan Altima for $12,000.
CARS: $14,000
MORTGAGE: $128,900
DEBT: $142,900

2003
Comfort began to take out student loans.

2002-2005
Refinanced their Germantown home several times to fund improvements and to pay off some debt, including the cars.
MORTGAGE: $128,900
CASHOUTS: $95,000
DEBT: $223,900

July 2004
Refinanced their Germantown home to borrow $60,000 for the down payment on a new house in Fairwood, outside of Bowie.
CARS: $14,000
MORTGAGE: $128,900
CASHOUTS: $155,000
DEBT: $283,900

November 2005
Took out two loans to buy the new home in Fairwood.
GERMANTOWN MORTGAGE: $128,900
GERMANTOWN CASHOUTS: $155,000
FAIRWOOD MORTGAGES: $554,683
DEBT: $838,583

September 2006
Refinanced to consolidate the two loans on Fairwood home and some debt.
GERMANTOWN MORTGAGE: $128,900
GERMANTOWN CASHOUTS: $155,000
NEW FAIRWOOD MORTGAGE: $612,276
DEBT: $896,176

2006
Took out personal loans after their tenant in Germantown failed to pay rent. Comfort obtained two $20,000 business loans.
GERMANTOWN MORTGAGE: $128,900
GERMANTOWN CASHOUTS: $155,000
FAIRWOOD MORTGAGE: $612,276
PERSONAL LOANS: $15,000
BUSINESS LOANS: $40,000
DEBT: $951,176

2013
Comfort completed a master’s degree after taking out roughly $60,000 in student loans.
GERMANTOWN MORTGAGE: $128,900
GERMANTOWN CASHOUTS: $155,000
FAIRWOOD MORTGAGE: $612,276
PERSONAL LOANS: $15,000
BUSINESS LOANS: $40,000
STUDENT LOANS:$60,000
DEBT: $1,011,176

January 2015
The Boatengs are still living in the Fairwood home. They have not made a mortgage payment in more than six years.

—————–

Swamped by an underwater home
Washington Post | 1-26-15 | Kimbriell Kelly

When they moved into the house in November 2005, Kofi was earning $82,740 as an IT consultant for a government contractor, and Comfort, then 43, was making $30,000 as an administrative assistant. But in the overheated mortgage market of the time, they said everyone told them that they could buy a $600,000 house.

They made a $60,000 down payment and all their mortgage payments for more than 2½ years — through September 2008. But the house was financed with subprime loans, which reset to higher rates after short time periods, creating what are known as “shock payments.” The Boatengs said they could not make their new higher payment, and, in the middle of the 2008 mortgage crisis, they could not refinance.

 
Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:20:20

AZ Federal Judge suspects Federal attorneys of fraud in a former ATF agent’s suit
A federal judge suspects that seven attorneys representing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives committed fraud in the case of a retired federal agent who infiltrated the Hells Angels motorcycle gang in Arizona.

Court of Federal Claims Judge Francis Allegra banned the attorneys from filing documents in his court, and he ordered additional hearings to investigate the attorneys’ actions, essentially creating a trial within a trial.

The accusations are spelled out in newly unsealed court documents in the case involving former federal agent Jay Dobyns. The judge had previously ruled in Dobyns’ favor, but later withdrew his own decision after learning about the ATF attorneys’ conduct.

Former U.S. Attorney for Arizona Paul Charlton said he has never heard of a federal judge taking similar action against government attorneys.

“That’s extraordinarily unusual, and if the basis for that order is true, greatly disappointing,” said Charlton.

greatly disappointing’ understates the issue greatly

The specific order that names the banned attorneys remains sealed.

Up to now, my opinion has been that prosecutors, like the king, can do no wrong.

The newly unsealed court documents disclose:

— An ATF attorney attempted to thwart an investigation into arson at Dobyns’ house, and fellow ATF attorneys failed to report the incident to the court. Those actions put the integrity of the trial at risk, according to the judge.

—Dobyns’ attorney, James Reed, has been under relentless surveillance for months by several unidentified people.

The court previously found that two now-retired ATF executives, George Gillett and Charles Higman, allowed Dobyns to be treated as a suspect in the 2008 fire as a form of payback for a previous settlement he had received against ATF for largely ignoring earlier death threats against him.

“DOJ attorneys had been misrepresenting facts,” Dobyns alleged in an interview with The Arizona Republic. “They have been withholding evidence. And I think Judge Allegra, whatever the basis for the decision was, I think it’s appropriate.

“Judge Allegra not only has the obligation to be the finder of fact, he has the obligation to protect the dignity and integrity of the United States justice system.”

Unsealed court records reveal at least two instances in which ATF attorneys may have committed fraud, Allegra wrote in a Dec. 1 opinion.

The second instance of possible fraud occurred when ATF attorneys failed to report to Allegra that an ATF agent who testified in the case was threatened by another witness, according to Allegra’s Dec. 1 decision.

Dobyns said the case has made him question everything he stood for during his career.

“They have been so dirty and so corrupt,” he said. “That was not the system that I believed that I was working for and within.”

 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:21:17

The only answer is bigger and bigger government with more and more power and higher and higher taxes.

And to shoot the protestors on sight!

————————-

Oil Cash Waning, Venezuelan Shelves Lie Bare
New York Times | JAN. 29, 2015 | WILLIAM NEUMAN

Mary Noriega heard there would be chicken.

She hated being herded “like cattle,” she said, standing for hours in a line of more than 1,500 people hoping to buy food, as soldiers with side arms checked identification cards to make sure no one tried to buy basic items more than once or twice a week.

But Ms. Noriega, a laboratory assistant with three children, said she had no choice, ticking off the inventory in her depleted refrigerator: coffee and corn flour. Things had gotten so bad, she said, that she had begun bartering with neighbors to put food on the table.

“We always knew that this year would start badly, but I think this is super bad,” Ms. Noriega said.

Venezuelans have put up with shortages and long lines for years. But as the price of oil, the country’s main export, has plunged, the situation has grown so dire that the government has sent troops to patrol huge lines snaking for blocks. Some states have barred people from waiting outside stores overnight, and government officials are posted near entrances, ready to arrest shoppers who cheat the rationing system.

Because Venezuela is so dependent on oil sales to buy imports of food, medicine and many other basics, the drop in oil prices means that there is even less hard currency to buy what the country needs….

One of the nation’s most prestigious public hospitals shut down its heart surgery unit for weeks because of shortages of medical supplies. Some drugs have been out of stock for months, and at least one clinic performed heart operations only by smuggling in a vital drug from the United States. Diapers are so coveted that some shoppers carry the birth certificates of their children in case stores demand them.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:48:44

The end state for all corrupt socialist basket cases that have burned through Other People’s Money and are now facing fiscal reality.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:24:12

A mistrust of government, 0.001% interest rates and then obama going after 529 plans.

Nope. No negative repercussions there…

Hope and change. Literally, under your mattress.

————————

Forget the bank: Why many Americans are hiding cash
Yahoo Finance - 1/30/2015

Where to stash your cash? Some Americans are sleeping on it-literally.

While banks are still the go-to solution for most consumers, 29 percent say they’re keeping at least some savings in cash bills and coins, according to a new survey of 1,820 adults from American Express (AXP).

Of those holding cash savings, 53 percent are hiding it in a secret location. Millennials are even more apt than other generations to go the mattress or freezer route, with 67 percent of those saving cash saying that they hide it outside a bank account.

“We’ve long asked people about how they’ve planned to keep their savings, and for the past few years, we’ve seen an uptick in people saving cash,” said Kimberly Litt, public affairs manager at American Express.

Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:33:08

My mother used to stash $20 bills in the winter coats in her closet, and late in her life she told me to be sure to check all pockets in her old clothing before giving anything away.

 
Comment by tresho
2015-01-31 08:34:34

Is the Bank of Sealy TBTF?

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:42:25

obama’s 529 tax plan was a test run for going after 401ks.

It is coming.

obama has put piled more debt ($8 trillion) than every other previous administration combined and accounting for inflation.

The FSA wants their free sh*t for their votes. They will be paid.

Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 09:04:39

It is coming ??

Not until after the 2016 election IMO….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:16:36

Smart people know electronic assets will be confiscated by the statists. Movable, hidable assets and guns to protect those asets.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 09:33:02

Movable, hidable assets and guns to protect those asets ??

But what good are they is you must hide them ?? Like Blue on his boat…Sooner or later you got to come to shore…And sooner or later you will need to come outside…

If hard cash under the mattress becomes the safety net, no one will be safe…

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:45:51

Low hanging fruit is the electronic assets. most likely they will be taken, as that is the quickest way and there is the least resistance to it.

Door to door is dangerous and people will use guns to shoot government agents invading their homes. To get to that point, electronic assets will be confiscated first. When over half the population becomes anti state, government will fear the people too much to go door to door.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-31 10:28:27

Shooting a cop is a pretty dumb thing to do, regardless of what the cop is doing.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:00:43

Shooting a cop is a pretty dumb thing to do, regardless of what the cop is doing ??

Thanks Mighty….Bill thinks that his little arsenal will stand up to a swat team…Besides Bill, its not the government thats going to come for your stash…It will be the vigilantes & thugs…

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 11:10:11

Suppose the government is evil? Hitler was put into power by a democracy. At what point is force by a cop initiation of force? Have you not seen phony scandals posts of police lobbing flash bangs into a baby’s face? Or shooting a ten year old dark skinned girl in her home?

Bad laws should not be obeyed. Retaliatory force against evil government is necessary at times. Review what led to American independence.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:53:44

Bad laws should not be obeyed. Retaliatory force against evil government is necessary at times ??

Here is the problem with your theory Bill…Your DEAD…Someone else will be enjoying your cash & wine…

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-01-31 16:40:38

But in the situation of door to door, it’s kill or be killed. That is a dire situation and the door to door thing is very unlikely to happen before the electronic assets are partially confiscated. And I predict no confiscation of precious metals. Because so few people in the USA have them. They were currency back in 1933.

No one in a funny uniform is above the same law as anyone invading my property. If you think they are, you are the one with a problem.

You are a sheep if you think bad laws must be obeyed.

“One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” - Martin Luther King

Stealing ones property that he spent precious time and effort earning is tantamount to violating ones right to life. Door to door confiscation by people in funny uniform is unjust and one is morally obligated to block that from happening to his own property.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-01-31 19:50:26

I wasn’t referring to the ethics of the issue. Shooting at a cop will probably get you killed. Unless you want to die, it’s a foolish thing to do.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:50:43

First the Wall Streeters will be allowed a final looting spree of retirement accounts, the last great hoard of wealth still beyond their reach. Look for the Republicrat duopoly to push for “privatization” of social security to hasten the process.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:03:26

Look for the Republicrat duopoly to push for “privatization” of social security to hasten the process ??

Yep…Add to that Medicare…Already tried it once…If they get the Presidency, its all over…Just one of several reasons I believe Hilary will win…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 08:44:22

“’We’ve long asked people about how they’ve planned to keep their savings, and for the past few years, we’ve seen an uptick in people saving cash,’ said Kimberly Litt, public affairs manager at American Express.”

I ask people - strangers - the same thing and I’ll be damned if they don’t tell me.

I also ask people what type of burglar alarms system they have and what kind of dog they own and it greatly interests me when they tell me they don’t have either. And, if I ask correctly, they will tell me when they leave their house empty while on vacation and how long they are usually gone.

I don’t ask these questions directly, of course, but I do manage to work them into conversations.

As Mr. Banker says, people are smart.

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 08:52:22

Just tell them most nights you are usually drunk and cleaning your guns…

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 08:58:43

“There is nothing so dangerous for anyone who has something to hide as conversation! A human being, Hastings, cannot resist the opportunity to reveal himself and express his personality which conversation gives him. Every time he will give himself away.” - Agatha Christie

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:04:29

You don’t tell anyone who can tail your address that you stash things. Plus, the FTB does not know where I lodge in Cali. None of the FTB’s business. Arizona knows my snail mail address. But I don’t stash there.

Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:13:30

Bill, you told us you have a stash and you live alone and thus you have to leave your place that is-just-south-of-Irvine empty when you leave to go to work.

Bill, you are a dream come true.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:14:40

Good luck going door to door looking for cash. You won’t live long that way.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:18:54

To narrow it down a bit further:

You are in your Fifties and you are an engineer.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:21:44

And you like bitcoins and such.

Bill, you are leaving a trail.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:23:50

Oh, and gold bullion, and wines

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:24:54

You are starting to frighten me (yawn).

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:29:36

You are a Libertarian and I believe you told us what sort of car you drove, but this I can’t remember.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:32:12

And you once said that you looked like Mister Peepers.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:42:02

Still have to go door to door. Oops, someone just might be home on a weekday with their guns. And it is a myth that residents of Orange County do not use lethal force against home invasion. Google it. Let’s play “Let’s Make a Deal,” and you dress up in your Hamburgler outfit and go door to door in the tens of thousands of residents just south of irvine. Some of these shoot at intruders and they do not have a sign posting that they have guns.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:57:10

“Still have to go door to door.”

Wrong. All I have to do is put together all the clues you have willingly given to us over the years (and there have been a LOT of them) and then bash these clues against some databases and - presto! - everyone who is not you will be filtered out, which means the only person that will be left is …

(ta da)

… is you.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 10:08:37

If you are that obsessed, there are far bigger fish to fry. Smart people don’t have all their treasures in one box. Most of my precious metals in physical form is not even in OC. Please go door to door. Nutters who wish to initiate force are begging to be shot and killed.

 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 10:12:14

Another inconvenient problem for nutters like you is that I move very often. And one more: I sometimes provide disinformation here on this blog and have been consistent on that info.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 10:14:50

“I move very often.”

Thank you for that. It helps with the narrowing.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 10:17:11

“If you are that obsessed, there are far bigger fish to fry.”

Maybe so, but I’m into easy.

 
 
Comment by ibbots
2015-01-31 09:14:50

The FTB makes the IRS look like kitty cats.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2015-01-31 08:58:18

War bills have to be paid, man.

Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 09:07:35

+1 Butters…

 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:01:45

The bank of Bill is a private bank. Chock hull of paper money, gold bullion, and wines. Life cannot be better.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 09:17:13

Hows are Free Shitters, Empty Pockets and socialism disciples today?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:57:24

And how are the Obama Zombies, McCain Mutants, and Romney Retards today? Actually, come to think of it, I really don’t care. Vegetables gotta veg.

 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 09:50:13

I am excited! Just got a notification from Zillow that a Scottsdale House I am watching for sale dropped its price by $1000. From $719,000 to $718,000.

Yawn.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-01-31 09:55:26

I looked at a house up in the mountains I like, on the market for $379K. When the realtor asked what I thought, I noted the 2010 selling price was $314K and asked why the seller was padding the price. Got a song and dance about improvements, to which I just gave an enigmatic smile and said, I think I’ll hold off and buy after the next housing bubble crash. Felt kind of like Dorthy throwing water on the Wicked Witch, only on purpose.

 
Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 09:59:24

“… a Scottsdale House I am watching …”

Ah! Another clue!

Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 10:14:12

Okay Mr. Stalker (or are you the school marm?). Your obsession is getting evident. How many posts have we wasted here? Ben is noticing.

Comment by Mr. Burgular
2015-01-31 10:20:04

Just trying to make a point. And I think I have.

There will be no more such posting from me regarding you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 10:21:53

I would use Joshua tree here to block you but I am using safari. Need to get Firefox for iPad…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 10:26:03

Won’t be watching the super bowl this year either. But I wonder what government crimes will be stepped up while the sheep are lulled to brain numbness glued to a team sport?

Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:10:33

while the sheep are lulled to brain numbness glued to a team sport ??

Well, you obviously are not a competitive athlete or you would understand that many life skills can be learned through team sports…

Comment by butters
2015-01-31 11:41:19

Like what?

 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 11:59:40

Team work…Learning how to fail…Learning how to win…Discipline…Pushing your limits…Building Character….Controlling temperament…

Comment by Bill, just south of Irvine
2015-01-31 12:05:24

You learn team work by…being on a team. 30 years of that in my work. It is the real world. you don’t need to learn that onc you are a working adult. We’re you ever a kid on a team in school? Hat was enough. Grow up and get a job. Get away from government propaganda - television.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 12:37:16

You learn team work by…being on a team. 30 years of that in my work ??

Yeah Bill but we are not born at age 25….So there is that period of time from birth to working age adult leaning curve that needs to be filled in…Like I said, you likely are not a competitive athlete that played a lot of team sports so you would not know what I am talking about…

 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 11:38:38

Super Bowl = Millions of people watching crybaby/thug millionaires belonging to a team owned by a FSA billionaires playing in a billion dollar stadium all subsided by the taxpayers.

But it is a good excuse to get together with friends…

Comment by butters
2015-01-31 11:50:45

That’s a revelation. When did good republicans like you started hating rich people for their wealth?

Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 12:01:07

2-Fruit thinks they are all democrats…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 12:02:21

I do not hate rich people who provide innovating and quality goods/services I want. They earned it. They should be rich. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, the CEO of Yuengling Beers, the CEO of Honda, the CEO glock, etc.

I hate rich people who do nothing but leach off the system/laws (meaning me) and instill a system of crony capitalism. Most of wall street, most lawyers, most politicians, many unions, all public unions, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2015-01-31 12:52:38

Well we have a lot in common then 2-fruit…I feel the same way…

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 15:37:15

Except you demand a free ride.

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2015-01-31 19:27:47

actually its the perfect time for the mooslims to blow up something or behead 100 amerikans

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by Patrick
2015-01-31 12:02:40

“what these prices mean isn’t clear right now, but the message couldn’t possibly be louder.”

When you print too much money you should get serious inflation. The Fed has achieved the edge of deflation. Bond yields have gone done creating higher values for older bonds. We can see that housing prices are being set at how much the buyer can afford to pay monthly - not what the house is worth. Pricing structures are obeying the most for the least.

I would really like to know in advance what that “message” will be.

I think it is too late to allow the markets to find their own equilibrium and too early to allow politicians to try and right the ship.

Comment by 2banana
2015-01-31 12:15:24

There is no inflation when:

1. Wages don’t rise

2. The people who get the first shot at the printed money use it to make themselves richer and richer.

The money never gets to the “common folk” except as debt. Lots of “easy credit” and leverage for the common folk.

Debt does not lead to inflation. But it does lead to deflation when people default on that debt.

Comment by tj
2015-01-31 16:13:12

There is no inflation when:

1. Wages don’t rise

wages didn’t rise faster than prices in wiemar.

let’s talk about prices instead of ‘inflation’. inflation can mean many things in different contexts. prices can’t.

there is more than one cause of rising prices (+gpl). most people think that ‘money printing’ causes rising gpl. there are a few problems with that. one is that not all printed money gets out into the system. another is that the value of money/currency itself changes. therefore if the value of the dollar increases faster than new money entering the system, we can get falling gpl even with more dollars in the system.

it gets more complicated than that too. though it tends to be fleeting, gpl rises and falls with inventories.

to see the complete problem you have to know some of the major factors that affect the value of our dollars. else, you’re just blindly throwing darts.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 16:32:16

Bottlenecks, price fixing and deliberate interference with supply leads to inflated prices but that’s not inflation.

The money printing narrative gets old. Back to the fundamental; Print $10 trillion in currency and warehouse it. No inflation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tj
2015-01-31 17:19:56

Bottlenecks, price fixing and deliberate interference with supply leads to inflated prices but that’s not inflation.

bottlenecks will take care of themselves over time. deliberate interference with supply IS an attempt at price fixing. there are other things (as you know) that are price fixing in disguise. tarp, harp, QE, cash-for-clunkers etc. etc. all of it is an attempt at price fixing. targeting interest rates is an attempt to price fix money. all of it is wrong.

The money printing narrative gets old. Back to the fundamental; Print $10 trillion in currency and warehouse it. No inflation.

no rising gpl from that, true! but remember that there are other forces continually acting on the value of our dollars.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 12:32:47

“When you print too much money you should get serious inflation.”

Hows that working out for them?

Comment by Patrick
2015-01-31 17:50:04

Deflation ! !

 
 
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-01-31 18:03:43

“When you print too much money you should get serious inflation”

That, in a nutshell, is the quantity theory of money. Many economists today say that theory doesn’t apply much more in today’s world because the majority of money today is credit created on demand. I can walk into a bank today and say gimme a credit card with a $10,000 credit line and - poof - I have $10k to spend. When that $10k credit line is given to me there is no linkage to paper currency printed by the currency.

Jobs and wages put a practical limit on credit demand. If there’s full employment and wages are rising, people get more credit cards and their limits raised, businesses take out loans, then inflationary pressures increase. If there’s no demand for credit the Treasury can print dollar bills to the moon and it won’t trigger inflation.

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-01-31 18:06:49

“no linkage to paper currency printed by the currency.” should be “no linkage to paper currency printed by the Treasury.” Sorry for the goof. Wish this blog had an Edit function…

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-01-31 18:15:18

You’ve got it backwards. when there is full employment and wages are rising, borrowers retire debt.

Hint: We haven’t seen that in 30 years. Just what have we seen the last 30 years?

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-01-31 20:57:54

Unfortunately HA only a few wise people retire debt during the go-go years. The psychology of the crowd is they think the good times will last forever and they borrow to the hilt.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-01-31 22:37:46

Yeah, well.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 12:28:24

Comment by rms
2015-01-31 11:03:10

“Did you sell your Treasurys too early?”

Been waiting for deflation to make them more valuable.

Given that central bankers have a standing plan to create 2% annual inflation forever, how do you expect this to ever happen?

Comment by rms
2015-01-31 16:48:26

“Given that central bankers have a standing plan to create 2% annual inflation forever, how do you expect this to ever happen?”

I was counting on market forces.

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 19:34:10

Do those have any effect when central bankers are working 24/7 to thwart them?

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 18:06:19

Most college students literally have no idea how much they’re paying to go to school

By Christopher Ingraham December 11, 2014

A majority of first-year undergraduates can’t correctly estimate how much student loan debt they’re taking on. More surprising, among college freshmen who have taken out federal student loans, more than a quarter (28 percent) don’t think they have any federal debt, and 14 percent don’t think they have any debt at all.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/12/11/most-college-students-literally-have-no-idea-how-much-theyre-paying-to-go-to-school/

Comment by aNYCdj
2015-01-31 19:26:04

funny you should mention that

HOW MUCH IS THAT PSYCHOLOGY DEGREE WORTH?

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2015-01-28.html

 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-01-31 18:35:45

these students need loans to support high admin costs of the schools. Do it for the students!

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-01-31 19:59:22

Good Night from Region IV

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-01-31 22:35:38

97% of home sales price statistics are made up.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-02-01 06:32:08

BINGO

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-02-01 10:22:03

The other 3% are cherry-picked.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-02-01 18:19:04

Exactly.

Anything to avoid the topic of falling housing prices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post