For years we have used looser for loser on this blog,nhonestly I cannot remember how it started but using it shows that you have been reading this blog for a long time.
‘Farmland values have fallen dramatically across the Hawkeye state. According to new market reports, land prices are down about 15 percent and are only expected to continue to drop.’
‘Jeff Paullus, the general manager for Brakke Implement in Mason City, tells us they have already seen this decline make an impact on their business. “Our new equipment is not going down in price,” he explains, “so the producers are faced with higher prices and then lower the prices from what he sells so, he’s not spending quite as much.”
‘Paullus says that over the last 12 to 18 months, they have seen business fall by roughly 50 percent because of weakening land prices, but he says he’s optimistic about things bouncing back. “We’ll get through this, it’s is just a cycle,” he says.’
Down 15%? How much did it go up the past 10 or 15 years? How many billions in wall street money was bidding land up?
This isn’t part of a cycle. You can thank the central banks, as one wheel comes off after another.
Speaking of farmland, I finally got a chance to see the flick Interstellar last night. Very good movie, although it jumped the shark in the last 40 minutes (long movie) and then came back with a great ending.
Interesting parallels to the Dust Bowl, which was part of the Depression that ended the bubble of the early 20th century. Great artistic commentary on mis-use of science, overpopulation, globalization and political correctness.
As we discussed many times years ago, when you can gross $300 or so per acre, with a lot of hard work, machinery and chemicals, farm land as a business isn’t worth more than $1,000 per acre. The rest is bubble.
Come on out of California, Skye. Almonds here gross $6,000 per acre. Don’t worry about the drought, just drill the well deeper and suck the water out faster than your neighbor does.
Here’s 66 acres of almonds for only $2.3 million. $400k gross on $2.3 mil, even comes with its own well, what could go wrong?
Almond farms are selling for $25,000/acre. They will be back to $5,000/acre soon.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 09:08:57
$5k/acre is $4500 overpriced and a fraaaaaaaaud.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-05 11:11:41
Large chunks of Red Mountain (wine AVA) have been bought recently in the $50K/acre price-range (I heard of two separate ~500-acre plot sales).
If you crop it at 3 tons/acre, you could gross about $9K/acre—and some growers crop at closer to 7 tons/acre. Not super-clear to me what the expense side of the ledger is for management, crews to prune/crop/harvest, etc. But I’ll ask a friend who owns a plot there.
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-04-05 11:18:13
Vineyards in the Finger Lakes are overpriced too.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 11:28:46
$3k/ton for grape crush? You’re deluded. Worse yet, once the expenses are paid it’s barely break even.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-05 11:40:19
You don’t know jack. The price for grapes in Washington State is set by a grower’s association (essentially a cartel), and it is stable at $1.50/lb for high-quality wine grapes. I know—because I pay it.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 12:16:25
I grew up in ag my friend. You’re pimping retail by the pound prices for grape crush.
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-04-05 13:56:01
“$50K/acre price-range…”
We wonder if that is a practical price! You would need to net 1/10 of that each year for it to pencil out. For $20K/acre here in the Finger Lakes you get producing vines, an actual wine production facility, a restaurant, a retail facility, a recognized brand and good will.
The question of what Midwest flat land fit for cattle or corn/oats/hay/pasture is worth is not answered by what high end producing vineyards fetch. Also, the wine mania is quite alive and kicking.
I looked at a piece of cleared land, in grass, 100 acres right on the same lake view slope as the local famous wineries. It was priced at $1000/acre. No vines, no facilities. It sold for cattle pasture. The farmers around here buy land because the price always goes up and will pay several thou an acre on that basis, not on what it will produce. Menonites even, and with borrowed money. I doubt the basic math has changed since I sold my farm.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-05 21:32:44
I grew up in ag my friend. You’re pimping retail by the pound prices for grape crush.
You are truly clueless. I see the invoices that show tons, not pounds. I used pounds only because that is more familiar to most folks.
But stick with your fantasy land. And then call a few growers and ask for prices yourself. You can apologize later.
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-05 21:36:38
Also, the wine mania is quite alive and kicking.
Oh, +1, I totally agree, Blue. I was merely indicating what reality is today, and I do suspect that this asset-class is Fed-bubble-induced at the moment.
I sure hope it doesn’t last, at least… I happen to know that 15yrs ago, that $50K/acre was $3500/acre.
Is it a bubble? Sure looks like it to me. Will it deflate? I suspect so. When? God only knows.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-06 09:57:43
“I see the invoices”
Right. Prove this fantasy. Redact the invoice and post it. GO~!
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-06 09:59:59
It’s already falling my friend.
Seattle, WA Sellers Slash List Prices 22% YoY On Plunging Housing Demand
What’s really interesting is that a 15% drop in land prices translated into a 50% drop in this man’s businesss. What will happen if/when the price of land really crashes?
You will work for decades just to get your nose above water. That sitting back and watching “assets” crumble must be an uncomfortable situation these days.
That’s class resentment of the means used to rig the game (i.e. buying political influence) to loot the wealth of others. Corruption and greed. That is why bottoms are good.
A large part of rigging the game is taking the middle class hostage, and making damn sure that the middle class gets hit harder than the rich do. Bottoms are good only for the rich.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 11:40:54
Paying inflated prices is good Donk?
Cmon now.
Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2015-04-05 15:30:48
Oxide, that’s not true. Those who invested in Ben’s Joshua Tree fund were not rich. Ben is not rich. It’s all about how you play the cards you’re dealt.
Know when to hold em, know when to fold em. It’s a country Easter on the HBB.
I tried to report some fraud being perpetrated with respect to some of the shenanigans going on in my development, but the agency just came back and told me that unless I could provide the documents I told them to check, they could not do anything. They had no power to investigate. The system is designed to protect the fraud.
‘There is only one conclusion to come to from all this, which is that wherever you look, whatever kind of property you look at, prices are falling. But the really big question is whether all this is a softening, a bigger correction, or even the start of another crash.’
‘there is actually plenty to be optimistic about…True, in recent months quite a few property speculators may have got badly burned. But that’s not a bad thing is it?’
It is amazing that no matter in the world you go the same elements are present, one constant is that all the bubble areas consider themselves immune from a correction, an excerpt from the link:
As every expert I speak to tells me, it’s all about “location, location, location.” So let’s look at a few locations, starting with the Palm Jumeirah. Apartment sale prices there along the coveted Shoreline (based on current listed prices) are generally down around 20 percent against 18 months ago. Assuming the drop is the same on actual transaction prices, that’s a hefty fall. Downtown Dubai, which we are constantly being told is immune, is also experiencing falls. Some parts of the developments are 10 percent down over the same period. Dubai Marina sale prices — again, I’m basing these on our database of listed prices that we monitor — look to have slipped between 10-15 percent.
Immunity to price declines is a mentality common to manias. Sure, it makes no sense later, but is a given at the time. From the desk clearing post:
‘Downtown Boston saw condo sales drop by a quarter through the end of February, while the median price edged down 14 percent to $757,500…the median sales price in Manhattan was $970,000 during the first quarter of 2015, compared with $980,000 last quarter. The luxury segment saw its median sales price drop 10.6 percent to $5.1 million. There were also nearly 20 percent fewer luxury sales…CMBS lenders and investors are now worried low oil prices will leave them facing foreclosures and heavy losses. Many are declining to funnel more cash into once-hot areas in North Dakota and Texas…Public and private home prices across Singapore kept falling in the first quarter of this year, with further declines expected…For those of you looking to hop onto the property bandwagon in Dubai, waste no time; it’s currently a buyer’s market. Brigitte Tenbergen, a luxury sales specialist at LuxHabitat, a luxury real estate brokerage in Dubai, said: ‘It’s definitely a buyer’s market emerging in Dubai as prices have been dropping by almost 15 to 20 per cent since the peak of prices on luxury properties’
What’s more, there are tens of thousands of units being built in Dubai. And Toronto, and China, and Dallas, and San Francisco and Miami. Etc.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 07:49:54
“Immunity to price declines is a mentality common to manias.”
If I committed every last hour of my labor for the next 30 years to a depreciating asset at a grossly inflated price, I’d be in denial at this point too.
When you hear words like immunity, it should set off alarm bells. A lack of fear about ever higher prices shows that this isn’t a cycle. In a cycle, there is a knowledge that prices will decline. In a mania, this is discarded in favor of a new paradigm. What’s amazing to me is they can talk of immunity in Dubai, when it just crashed a few years ago! BTW, they aren’t selling condos in Dubai with 3% down.
you serfs need to support wall street and the bankers by buying into the recovery and buying stocks and homes. Don’t listen to paranoid bloggers who missed out on this major stock and home appreciation.
I was wondering about and searching out the reason how American Homes 4 Rent can get away with its off balance sheet transactions and I happened to run across this:
“Liabilities - Types Of Off-Balance-Sheet Financing
“Many economic transactions and events are not recognized in the financial statements because they do not qualify as accounting assets or transactions under GAAP standards. That said, these unreported assets and liabilities have real cash flow consequences. As a result, it is important to be able to identify and qualify these assets and liabilities.”
And one of these economic transactions is:
“The sale of accounts receivables - A company may sell its receivables to an unrelated third party to reduce its debt and improve its financial position. Most sales of receivables provide the buyer with a limited recourse to the seller. However, the recourse provision is generally well above the expected loss ratio on the receivables (allowance for doubtful accounts). The potential liability associated with the buyer-recourse provision is not displayed on the balance sheet.”
And this is what AMH is doing, it is selling off its receivables - its future income from rents - to third parties by bundling them up and tranching them.
And this does not show up on the company’s balance sheet but it sure does show up on the cash flow statement.
Allow your eyes to settle on the term “Other Cash Flows From Financing Activities”. Note the entry of $1,493,724. Add three zeros to this sum and you will end up with a sum of almost one-and-a-half billion dollars; This is the amount of money AMH received last year from three off balance sheet transactions and, IMO, these three transactions act to distort - greatly distort - the true picture of what is actually going on with this company, financial wise.
Something to think about: If I were to decide to put my money in a company that promised to pay me dividends out of future income - in this case future rental income - shouldn’t I be a bit concerned if somebody else gets first dibs and healthy portions of this future income?
BTW, AMH’s Cash Flow statement shows net income for last year as being a NEGATIVE $33,092,000 but nevertheless the company was able to pay out $82,507,000 in dividends.
If you have to ask how this is possible then you should contact me and ask me about maybe purchasing some Arizona beach property I may be willing to sell to you.
There is a lot of noise about these housing-investment-type companies cashing in in their rise in values (aka rise in prices) by selling into the rising market but … but … but how can they sell if they are committed to paying out rental income to debtors?
Any profits from the sales would have to go to the buyers of the debt.
(Maybe. Did I mention that the debts have been securitized and that they have been … have been tranched? And that some tranches carry higher risks that other tranches?)
Furthermore, The Company has employees (including executive employees) who earn salaries that are deducted from the various sheets before any profits get gained. If these salaries amount to, say, oh, millions in a year, or more millions in a couple years, then WHO CARES?
These companies are the endeavor of a group of people who desire to make a profit. If they can make the “Big Score” - make enough money so that their grandchildren don’t have to work - they’re going to do it.
If that means running the company aground, it’s a no-brainer - do it. The company is a mere logical construct, a front for individual activities.
Additionally, if this company is intricately tied with at least one other financial company, then it poses ’systemic risk’ and has an implicit government guarantee.
At that point, “monetary redistribution” comes into play. They’re selling worthless constructs they claim to be worth $X. Someone buys those constructs. Constructs are discovered to be worthless, company implodes, taking at least one other company with it. Government steps in and pays full price for all of its constructs, none of which had any value.
Government does this through borrowing or working with the central bank to print money (eventually).
And wham - purchasing power is transferred from the population to those holding outlandishly valued company financial products, by ever so slight currency devaluation through borrowing and then printing.
I meant to say they are selling their income to collection agencies. But wait, didn’t they already sell it in the form of bonds? They are using bonds to finance the mortgages, and the bonds are backed by rents, but the rents belong to a collection agency.
The collection agency must make more than is normally lost to delinquencies. Otherwise, it would not be in business.
Did the bond owners know this when they leant their money to the group? Do the bond owners realize that they are not first in line to receive rental profits? Do they realize that they invested in a company this inefficiently outsourcing its normal business operations to subcontractors?
This is too many layers. Real estate isn’t usually profitable enough to cover all that.
Here’s why I avoid homeowner’s associations: even if the HOA has a set of reasonable officers, there can be a hyper busybody who uses lawsuits to get in your business and tell you what you can’t do with your own property.
California is not over. It will survive the water deal. But it will get more and more expensive so that only 1% and the serfs on welfare or doing manual labor and getting tax breaks for their large impoverished family can live there.
There will be continued relocation of thousands of employees of large companies to other states as offices close.
People waste so much here it is mind boggling. Some simple choices would save a lot. The mindset most of the time is , if I dont use it someone else will.
It’s amazing how many comments I have seen from people who say they will still have a green lawn no matter what. It’s more of a “God given right” to Californians than owning 30 round magazines is to Arizonans. There will be many who will take the risk of being thrown in a cage for wasting water so that they can have a frigging green lawn.
A colleague of mine lives in Anaheim Hills. I overheard him talking with another colleague about the water deal. This A.H. guy basically says he will keep his green yard. He planted his lawn in the 70s there and took great care of it for over 40 years so he will continue to keep it green. Let’s see Mr. Jerry Brown’s fascist rules take my colleague down.
When I had a house in the high Mojave desert I was into Xeroscaping from day 1. I was proud to use very little water and was proud to try as much as possible to make my landscape blend into the surroundings.
The new rules by the Brown administration are very close to draconian. And it’s not the state of California’s fault for lack of water. It is too many people. Close to 40 million people live/work in California.
If water was privatized like it should have been in the 1970s the population of California would be under 20 million these days. The price of water would rise to its natural price. There would not be these silly green lawns in a desert.
But the market was not allowed to operate and the water has been subsidized to the Californians for too dam long.
The chickens are coming home to roost. Either water will become privatized or the state of California is going to find a way to add significant costs to water some other way and there will be a lot of people deciding it’s no longer worth the high price. Most of these are the household incomes between $100,000 and $300,000 (two breadwinners in a household). The backbone of the California revenue.
The new water rules are going to be made permanent, whether or not a few wet years will fill the reservoirs and aquifers. So the costs will be locked in and the middle class will start bailing.
The California real estate prices should be cratering.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-05 13:27:49
If water was privatized like it should have been in the 1970s the population of California would be under 20 million these days.
So how is that when the private sector raising prices to find supply/demand equilibrium it’s “freedom” but when the government does it, it’s “fascism”?
And FWIW, residential water has been damn expensive in California as long as I can remember. When Cali friends visit us I love to show them our water and other utility bills. They think I’m BS’ing them, because it couldn’t possibly be that cheap, especially when they see my huge emerald green Kentucky bluegrass lawn.
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 13:48:24
Our LLs were way out ahead of the water rationing…converted all except the smallish front yard lawn to wood chip cover over a year ago.
This saved us a bundle on watering and them a bundle on lawn care — real estate investing done right!
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-05 14:16:17
So how is that when the private sector raising prices to find supply/demand equilibrium it’s “freedom” but when the government does it, it’s “fascism”?
The same reason that a pair of good quality Nike shoes is sold at such a high price in the market it’s freedom but if it was raised by government it would be Fascism.
One is through voluntary exchange and the other is at gunpoint. You have the problem if you cannot see the difference between free choice and the threat of force.
Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2015-04-05 15:02:50
Water is a public resource, so people really shouldn’t be allowed to waste it on nonsense (grass and pools) when it’s scarce. If anyone thinks they have the “right” to all the water they desire, then they will need to back that up with a fearless posse and a lot of ammo. This is how it’s always been in the western United States. I am unclears as to why Californians (and Arizonans) have begun to think otherwise.
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 16:04:00
“…so people really shouldn’t be allowed to waste it on nonsense (grass and pools) when it’s scarce.”
The California drought is a man-made problem, not an act of God. In short, yes water supply is currently low. However, demand is not, and because there are no prices in the centrally planned water allocation system, the market cannot reach equilibrium.
Hence there is a shortage, due to bad policy, not God’s will.
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-05 16:32:30
The same reason that a pair of good quality Nike shoes is sold at such a high price in the market it’s freedom but if it was raised by government it would be Fascism.
Nikes are a want, not a necessity that is literally necessary for life.
As for “free markets” in water supply, ever heard of water rights? They can be bought and sold. There is nothing preventing the private sector from getting involved in water distribution. That they don’t bother should be telling.
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 16:33:17
Water The drying of the West
Drought is forcing westerners to consider wasting less water
Feb 22nd 2014 | LAKE MEAD, NEVADA | From the print edition
Timekeeper
THE first rule for staying alive in a desert is not to pour the contents of your water flask into the sand. Yet that, bizarrely, is what the government has encouraged farmers to do in the drought-afflicted south-west. Agriculture accounts for 80% of water consumption in California, for example, but only 2% of economic activity. Farmers flood the land to grow rice, alfalfa and other thirsty crops. By one account, over the years they have paid just 15% of the capital costs of the federal system that delivers much of their irrigation water. If water were priced properly, it is a safe bet that they would waste far less of it, and the effects of California’s drought—its worst in recorded history—would not be so
severe.
…
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-05 16:36:34
There is a reason why the private sector won’t build pricey desalination plants. If the drought ends those expensive desalination plants will go offline and their investors will lose their shirts. That’s why everyone expects the government to do it.
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 16:42:08
“If the drought ends those expensive desalination plants will go offline and their investors will lose their shirts.”
The frackin’ A!
Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2015-04-05 18:06:32
The farmers in California must compete on price with produce from Mexico. This is only possible if they are allowed to hire illegal Mexican labor, have access to gratuitous Mexican-style subsidies for water and business loans, and are compensated by the government when farmland is converted into residential housing, thereby pushing the farmers further into the desert.
NAFTA, meet consequences.
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-04-05 20:03:02
“…converted all except the smallish front yard lawn to wood chip cover over a year ago”
They must be hoping for a wildfire insurance bailout.
Either you bring the water to L.A., or you bring L.A. to the water.
californication has a whole ocean at its beck and call yet no plans to build any desalinization plants just in case of an emergency like this…but 100 billion for a kinda useless high speed rail…no problem
Some water shortage, with the entire Pacific Ocean at your back door.
How bizarre is that!?
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-05 16:17:04
How many desalination plants will be needed so everyone in Cali-land can flush their toilets and keep their lawns green? How long will it take to build them? How much will it cost to build them? How much energy will it take to run them? How will these plants be fueled? Why hasn’t the private sector jumped in and started building them?
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 16:19:31
“Why hasn’t the private sector jumped in and started building them?”
My guesses:
1) Energy costs are too high relative to the (subsidized) price of (existing government-provided) water sources.
2) Environmental extremists block development of desalinization technology, due to marine life impacts.
“Seventeen plants are in planning stages along the coast to convert salt water from the ocean or bays, including one near Concord that would serve every major water agency in the Bay Area.
That plant is tentatively targeted to open in 2020, but could be kick-started earlier in an emergency, officials say - and once online, would gush at least 20 million gallons a day of drinkable water.”
That would be about 2 gallons per day per Bay Area resident. Not a whole lot. That’s about 1 toilet flush. And we all know that if a mud snake is involved that more than one flush is needed. And that would cost 1 billion to build.
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-05 17:02:31
CA is too far into a bankrupt state to build de-sal.
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-05 19:49:59
CA is too far into a bankrupt state to build de-sal.
Here is an excellent breakdown of Chinese debt, as you can see there are very few consumer debt donkeys. There is very little federal government debt or unsecured debt of any type. What China does have is massive state owned enterprise debt. This is essentially secured by the assets of the corporations and in a free market economy a lot of the debt would be wiped out by selling equity in the corporations. If you look at the private corporations the most productive part of the Chinese economy, they have very little debt. China is at a crossroads, it needs to privatize the SOEs. The Communist party is trying to avoid the truth because losing the SOEs means losing a lot of its power. However, China wants to become a superpower and that will require that it deploy capital more efficiently and it is, no surprise, the capitalist part of its economy that is performing well. Think of the past and present examples, East and West Germany, Pre-1979 China/Taiwan and present N and S Korea:
The flaw in your logic is the worth of the assets used to secure the debt. If they could transport their empty skyscrapers to Miami, it might work out for them. As it is, they appear to be imploding.
The problem with your logic is the housing debt is a small percentage of the debt. Consumers owe very little due to high down payments and ten year mortgages. The builders had years of obscene profits prior to last year and can sell those houses, just not at the price they want for them. Most of the builders can restructure and pay their debts in full, the few that have run into trouble have been denied permission to sell the assets, not that they did not have assets that were in demand.
Bee. Ess. Consumers in China are borrowing money from loan sharks to get houses that cost 10x their household incomes. But oh, their parents just give them the money so it’s OK, whatever.
Blue, if the assets of a corporation exceed the liabilities it is quite easy to restructure the debts in a bankruptcy. The graphs I provided show that China is in better shape than it was in the 1990s according to debt to assets measures. Consumer debt is very low. The globalists are quite mad about that since leveling the economies of the world is one of the steps to world government. They want China to stop investing and start spending. Reduce the corporate debt by not building or modernizing its factories and create world demand by having its consumers go on a debt driven buying binge. This leveling of wealth is great if you live in Mexico but terrible if you live in the U.S. or Europe. China is already too “rich”, too quick and is an impediment to raising living standards in South America, Africa and the Middle East. They also fear that China could derail the whole one world government movement due to their nationalistic policies. Of course, this leveling does not include a personal leveling of their wealth, people doing God’s work by creating equality of nations deserve their days pay, even if that is one million or more dollars per day.
Well, if you take the Masters of the Universe out of what you said it boils down to assets greater than debts. That could be problematic to analyze if you let the principles value their own assets for you (like our US banks).
Circumstantial evidence suggests things there are approaching a critical state. All the new loans are going to rolling over the old loans. $1 Tr capital flight. Production overcapacity stalls global commodity prices. “A profound correction.” Just to name a few.
Once again, ABQ Ban uses BANKRUPTCY as a “solution” to debt. Either way, someone ends up holding the bag. I guess I shouldn’t expect anything less annoying from a guy who is being paid to make these absurd points.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-05 16:10:26
Who then adds insult to injury through the audacity of pretending not to get paid…
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-04-05 17:43:03
“being paid”
Unlikely IMO.
Wrong target audience.
It is a circus of manias. He’s just run away to the circus.
That’s pretty funny. Nearly $30 Tr in debt and nobody is actually in debt.
Not what I said, what I said is their assets exceed their debts. Take any billionaire and you will that they have hundreds of million probably billions in debts, they are billionaires due to their assets exceeding their liabilities by billions.
Private facility now holding immigration detainees in Bakersfield
By Carol Ferguson, Eyewitness News Published: Apr 3, 2015 at 6:13 PM PDT
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) - Undocumented immigrants are now being housed in a long-closed private correctional facility in Bakersfield.
ICE says this is its only facility in the San Joaquin Valley, and it’s key to meeting some of the agency’s goals.
“This facility will be in compliance with the most rigorous performance-based standards that we impose on our facilities,” ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said. She says the newly-renovated facility will be good for the people held there. “They’ll have access to the best possible conditions, and we’re very pleased about that.”
“We prioritize the use of our detention bed for individuals who are deemed to be public safety threats, and individuals who are thought to be flight risks,” she said. “They may have fairly significant criminal convictions, but I’d like to emphasize that if they would have prior criminal convictions — they have already fulfilled any sentence imposed in these cases.”
Kice said ICE now has an intergovernmental service agreement with the City of McFarland to run Mesa Verde, and the city has a contract with the GEO Group to handle day-to-day operations. A company spokesman has said GEO put some $10 million into the renovations at the facility.
The remodeled site has dorm-style rooms, ICE says, and detainees will have access to an on-site law library, medical clinic and religious services. It also has visitation rooms and recreation areas. The agency says the average cost to house a detainee at Mesa Verde will be $107 a day.
‘A Capitol Hill artist made five fake notices of proposed land use signs to place at popular Seattle locations on April Fools’ Day, to make a statement about the aggressive development he feels is changing the character of the city. John Tingley, who goes by the moniker “Tinglr,” said his installation art is called “The Joke’s On Us.”
‘Each sign declared a different project was underway. On a sign at Pike Place Market, he wrote that there would be a “mixed use condo/retail structure including the first of its kind subterranean Whole Foods/Trader Joe’s connected with the new SR-99 tunnel named Cash Hole Foods. With a little room left over for a Pike Place Farmers Market Museum!”
‘Tingley said he wanted to “make everybody think twice about how much development we’re approving in this city, how quickly it’s going up, and what it’s really doing to change the city of Seattle, the personality of Seattle, the heart and soul of Seattle.”
‘The words struck a chord with Nate Berendz. The sign he read described the new project as “another f—king concrete box. Maybe we’ll dress it up with some corrugated siding. What’s that ‘you say?’ ‘Not another boring eye-sore!’ That’s too bad. This is the most cost-effective way to build and you know we’re gonna get ours.”
‘Berendz said, “I feel like I see a sign, two weeks later I see a hole, two weeks later I see some new condos…I think it’s a statement that this neighborhood is being covered by concrete boxes.”
‘At Cal Anderson Park, a sign announced a project called “Entitlement Land,” with a Starbucks Frappuccino fountain and Tom Douglas restaurant called Serious Dogg. It would be protected by Amazon.com security drones. Jonathan Ross, who said he reads real land use action signs frequently, said, “You know you’d always see, like 54 units! No parking proposed.”
‘At the bottom of each sign, Tingley wrote that it doesn’t matter what anyone says. The builder will continue anyway.’
when condos start selling you know the end is near. Thats what happened last time. People were so desperate to get in on the action that even apartments started selling units off. You had owners who were paying twice as much as the renters were paying each month.
They should be required to include parking with all units, with special bicycle parking for the Frapuccino eaters. But seriously, I say “Build, build, BUILD!” Build until the prices go so low that I can buy me another rent house with the change in my pocket. Build it.
I have been watching the Florida Real Estate fraud here for two years since my Mother died and left me some money. It was a nice sum but not enough to buy a house and pay for my daughters college education so I have to be careful because it disqualifies us from college financial aid and I have been unable to develop sufficient income in this economy.
At the bottom, the SFH units in my development were tax appraised at $80,000. Some developers came in an bought up some of the units, one next door to me where one moved in. It had been empty for over a year and was in foreclosure. She was a realtor and had owned it. They were thugs and stacked their trash outside my front door in their narrow side yard so that their unit appeared to have a nice clean back yard and garage and they trespassed through my yard to access it. When I complained to the authorities, they vandalized my property and menaced me. It caused problems with my landlord and I am sure they intended to low ball her an offer if I moved out. It was a very bad time for me as I did not take my mothers passing very well. I did eventually get a “No Trespass” order on them and backed it up with video monitors.
The thugs got it out of foreclosure and sold it to an individual around tax appraisal price. They remained in the house and did some rehab. Then it was sold at an inflated price to a company and transferred multiple times to a company called SWAY 2014-1 Borrowers, LLC http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2fuz53/sway-2014-1-borrower-llc
They have several other units in the development. There were also a couple of other sales to another company and one last high dollar sale of $175,000 to an individual last August 2014. And then not another sale. Now this is all in Boynton Beach with a 12% delinquency and 15% under water.
So far, the units they have appear to be rented but some have had multiple different tenants so I am wondering if they have discounted rates. The unit next to me was rehabed and sold in July 2014 and rented out in October 2014 to a young couple with 2 kids. I hope they have discounted rent.
I think I am going to take Harry Dent’s advice and hold off on buying anything right now, unless I can get someone to take me up on a lowball offer.
There must be a way to disguise the inheritance. If recent reports of rising inventory are true, then you should hopefully have an affordable house soon. Maybe you can buy it from on of the institutions that owns so many in your neighborhood.
Report: Solar Energy Subsidies Cost $39 Billion Per Year
Solar makes up only 0.6 percent of total U.S. electricity generation
BY: Elizabeth Harrington
February 12, 2015 12:55 pm
“In spite of government’s best efforts to encourage innovation by solar energy companies and encourage Americans to rely more heavily on solar electricity, solar power continues to be a losing proposition,” the report said. “American taxpayers spent an average of $39 billion a year over the past 5 years financing grants, subsidizing tax credits, guaranteeing loans, bailing out failed solar energy boondoggles and otherwise underwriting every idea under the sun to make solar energy cheaper and more popular. But none of it has worked.”
“Congress needs to stop these massive subsidies that are siphoning $39 billion a year from taxpayers,” he said. “If solar is ever going to be a viable energy source and industry, they need to wean themselves off the public dole.”
“Solar energy’s day in the sun may yet come, but taxpayers should not be forced to foot the cost associated with turning the failing industry around,”
According to wikipedia, the combined US subsidies for all forms of renewal energy in 2013 was 7.3 billion, and that 3.2 billion was spent to subsidize fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel companies probably pay a multiple of ten times more in taxes than they receive renewal energy sources receive greater subsidies than they pay.
ABQ Ban, if the fossil-fuel vendors pay 10x more in taxes than they receive in subsidies, then why are they receiving subsidies in the first place? Should they be weaned, or is it all about political back-scratching and propping up prices?
The development of renewable energy is on par with scientific research. It actually IS the role of government to fund that sort of thing, since our society relies on it for long-term success.
Solar energy receives 1,212 times more government subsidies per megawatt than fossil fuels
Wind and solar get the most taxpayer help for the least production.
The nearby chart shows the assistance that each form of energy for electricity production received in 2010. The natural gas and oil industry received $2.8 billion in total subsidies, not the $4 billion Mr. Obama claims on the campaign trail, and $654 million for electric power. The biggest winner was wind, with $5 billion. Between 2007 and 2010, total energy subsidies rose 108%, but solar’s subsidies increased six-fold and wind’s were up 10-fold.
The best way to compare subsidy levels is by the amount of energy produced. But the Energy report conspicuously left out this analysis, though Congress specifically requested it.
Energy said that “caution” should be used in calculating the taxpayer handouts “relative to their share of total electricity generation,” because many wind and solar subsidies are for “facilities that are still under construction.” It also warned that “Focusing on a single year’s data does not capture the imbedded effects of subsidies that may have occurred over many years” for other energy sources.
This sounds suspiciously like a political dodge, because subsidies for renewable energy date to at least the 1970s. The problem is that wind and solar still can’t make a go of it without subsidies. Solyndra is merely the most famous of the solar-power failures. Earlier this month United Technologies sold its more than $300 million investment in wind power, with CFO Greg Hayes telling investors, according to press reports that: “We all make mistakes.” He added that the market for renewables like wind “as everyone knows, is stagnating.” Someone alert the White House.
The folks at the Institute for Energy Research used the Energy Department data to calculate a subsidy per unit of electricity produced. Per megawatt hour, natural gas, oil and coal received 64 cents, hydropower 82 cents, nuclear $3.14, wind $56.29 and solar a whopping $775.64.
So for every tax dollar that goes to coal, oil and natural gas, wind gets $88 and solar $1,212. After all the hype and dollars, in 2010 wind and solar combined for 2.3% of electric generation—2.3% for wind and 0% and a rounding error for solar. Renewables contributed 10.3% overall, though 6.2% is hydro. Some “investment.”
PUC president opposes reconsidering San Onofre cost agreement
San Onofre
An agreement to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station assigns approximately $3.3 billion of the costs to ratepayers in Southern and Central California and $1.4 billion to two utilities.
(Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)
By Marc Lifsher contact the reporter
The settlement avoided years of prolonged legal battles, Picker said.
The president of the scandal-rocked Public Utilities Commission has rejected a call from a powerful lawmaker to reopen a financial settlement that apportioned nearly $5 billion in costs for the June 2013 permanent closure of the damaged San Onofre nuclear power plant.
In letter to the PUC last month, Lakewood Democratic Assemblyman Anthony Rendon, the chairman of the Utilities and Commerce Committee, said “it is imperative to investigate and scrutinize the entire settlement process” to assure it was “legitimate and uncorrupted.”
On Thursday in a six-page response, PUC President Michael Picker called the settlement “appropriate under the commission’s rules” and “supported by the record developed in the proceeding.”
What’s more, he added, the settlement avoided years of prolonged legal battles while providing some financial relief to ratepayers.
The agreement’s most vocal critic, San Diego consumer attorney Michael Aguirre, immediately denounced Picker’s written comments as “riddled with errors,” based on a flawed record and an exercise in “stonewalling.”
…
COMMENTS
It was a lousy deal for rate payers and tax payers a year ago and it looks even worse today. Knowing what we know now, and really always knew, PUC Chairman Peevey was a shill for the energy utilities having come from among their ranks originally.
…
Hey PB, are you out there? (Of course you are out there; You are always out there.)
A question: Yesterday you made a reference to Enron having a lot of off-balance sheet stuff, do you know if there was a lot of institutional money invested in Enron at that time?
The reason I am asking is because American Homes 4 Rent has a whole lot of institutional money riding on it and I’m just wondering if absolute stupidity is institutionalized.
But maybe if one thinks of Institutional money as OPM then maybe it makes sense. Makes sense not in there not being stupidity but makes sense in that the stupidity lies with the OPM folks and not with the institutions.
Happy Easter, every bunny. May you find dollar bills in your baskets of currency, and never watch them go down a rabbit hole to finance the mortgage on an overpriced debt shack that was a bad egg from the start.
Really a shame that we don’t have national leaders who could deal with problems like these 2 kids.
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
Kentucky’s Andrew Harrison apologizes for obscenity, slur
4:27 p.m. Sunday, April 5, 2015
INDIANAPOLIS — Kentucky guard Andrew Harrison apologized Sunday for directing an obscenity and a racial slur at Wisconsin’s Frank Kaminsky during a postgame news conference at the Final Four.
Harrison muttered “F— that n—-” into a live microphone when another player was asked a question about Kaminsky after Kentucky lost 71-64 to the Badgers Saturday. The loss ruined the Wildcats’ undefeated season; they finished 38-1.
Harrison’s comment came as a reporter asked Kentucky’s Karl-Anthony Towns about defending the 7-foot Kaminsky. He muttered it with his hand in front of his mouth, but the mic picked up the comments.
Social media immediately lit up with tweets about what Harrison said along with video clips, and the program looked into the matter.
Harrison, who is black, didn’t explain why he made the comments about Kaminsky, who is white. But he said in a series of tweets his comments were a “poor choice of words used in jest towards a player I respect and know.”
“When I realized how this could be perceived I immediately called big frank to apologize and let him know I didn’t mean any disrespect,” he added.
He said the two of them had a “good conversation” and he wished him good luck in Monday’s championship game.
Kaminsky confirmed Sunday that Harrison reached out to him, and then the All-America forward quickly dismissed the topic.
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
“Harrison muttered “F— that n—-” into a live microphone when another player was asked a question about Kaminsky after Kentucky lost 71-64 to the Badgers Saturday. The loss ruined the Wildcats’ undefeated season; they finished 38-1.”
What does one racis’ and sore loser have to do with national policy?
It was a black kid saying “F— that n—-” about a white kid so I am not too sure how much “racis’” was involved but if the roles were reversed I am sure it would have been a national firestorm.
And I didn’t say national policy I said problems. They didn’t throw gas on a fire and IMHO it was handled better than other racial issues have been handled by many of our national leaders.
“I immediately called big frank to apologize and let him know I didn’t mean any disrespect,”
“Kaminsky confirmed Sunday that Harrison reached out to him,”
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
The Outlook Oil-Price Drop Offers Petro-States Chance to Curb Domestic Demand Middle East’s voracious energy use, propped up by subsidies, is threatening exports; consumption is ‘out of control’
A fuel station in Saudi Arabia, which has seen an eye-popping, more-than-60-fold increase in domestic energy consumption in the past four decades. Photo: Fahad Shadeed/Reuters
By Bill Spindle
April 5, 2015 3:20 p.m. ET
The sharp drop in oil prices hasn’t been kind to the world’s petro-states, but it has provided an opening to address one of their most pressing economic problems: runaway domestic energy demand.
In the Middle East, the growth in demand is driven in part by expanding populations, as well as a deliberate move into energy-intensive industries such as aluminum and petrochemical production. But a big part stems from the region’s ubiquitous energy subsidies.
Voracious energy use in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran is threatening exports from the most oil-rich region in the world. Failing to restrain this galloping demand could leave global markets more volatile, pressure domestic budgets and eventually nudge prices back up.
The 12 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries have increased domestic energy consumption tenfold in the past four decades, a period in which energy use in the rest of the world has a little more than doubled. Saudi Arabia has seen an eye-popping, more than 60-fold increase in consumption over that period.
As a group, OPEC members—mostly countries in the Middle East and Africa, plus Venezuela and Ecuador—now consume almost as much energy as China, with less than half its population. The Middle East, especially, is expected to account for a major chunk of future global demand growth. Saudi energy use is expected to grow at a 3.8% rate through 2020, according to the International Energy Agency. That’s slower than the country’s 5.7% annual average over the past six years, but well above the expected global average of 1.2%.
Consumption is “out of control,” said Steve Griffiths, an executive director at the Masdar Institute, an energy think tank in Abu Dhabi.
Nearly every country in the Middle East long ago embraced the notion that cheap fuel was essentially a birthright. As a result, energy is all but free in some places, such as Saudi Arabia, where a gallon of gasoline costs 45 cents. Governments pick up the rest of the tab, either paying for imports or forgoing income that could be earned by exporting domestic oil or gas rather than selling it for rock-bottom prices at home.
Most countries have realized that’s not sustainable. Some countries, such as Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela, have already hit that wall: They are unable to maintain their spending on imports to meet demand or balance their budgets without the export revenue they are forgoing to satiate consumers’ growing energy appetite. Iran has made some halting progress in raising prices closer to market levels; Nigeria and Venezuela haven’t.
Slashing subsidies is never easy, with the risk of social turbulence from an unhappy citizenry. The good news: Economists and policy makers point out that the steep drop in oil prices presents a historic opportunity to reel back price supports with minimal or even no immediate adjustment to what consumers pay.
Governments could take the time offered by the reprieve to design policies to construct a stronger social safety net, aiming support at those who need it when prices rise rather than an across-the-board subsidy.
Iran, facing runaway expenditures to import gasoline, has reduced subsidies (and thus raised prices at the pump) twice over the past five years, substituting direct cash payments to all consumers. Elsewhere, Indonesia and India have made similar moves more recently.
But there’s been little progress in other quarters of the Persian Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia, where the problem is particularly acute. The cost of artificially low prices there has ballooned from $5 billion in 2004 to $32 billion last year. Continued growth in Saudi energy use could make the country, now among the world’s largest oil exporters, an importer by 2038, according to Chatham House, a U.K.-based think tank.
Long before that, Saudi Arabia’s ability to hold back on pumping some of its oil—known as “spare capacity”—would disappear as domestic demand grows. That capacity, which can be switched on or off at the country’s whim, is key to its role as king of the world’s oil markets, and has been critical to its ability to smooth out what would otherwise have been some huge market swings.
Ballooning Saudi demand is “going to take away their ability to be the swing producer, to go up or down in production,” according to Jim Krane, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
That might seem irrelevant today, when the globe is glutted with oil. But as demand catches up to supply—in no small part due to swelling demand growth among Middle Eastern petro-states—the global oil market could become significantly more volatile, he notes.
Some big energy importers—such as Egypt, Indonesia and India—have managed to cut subsidies significantly to head off fiscal disasters. But the major petro-states, beyond Iran and Venezuela, have no budget pressures to focus officials’ minds on overhauls.
Countries like Saudi Arabia, fearful of a social blowback, can tap huge reserves to maintain their subsidies and cover the loss of export revenues. They are focusing on improving energy efficiency and expanding their domestic energy supplies through nuclear power plants.
But that only means energy use will continue to rise—and well above the rate new supply can be added. “Saudi is not a small energy consumer,” said Laura El-Katiri, a research fellow with the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. “What happens to demand there is important to the overall demand picture globally.”
…
Buffett not alone in failing to grasp Grexit dangers If Mr Buffett seriously thinks that the euro would be strengthened by a Greek exit, which is what he said, then he needs his head examined.
By Jeremy Warner
7:30PM BST 04 Apr 2015
It is hard to think of a nicer and wiser capitalist than Warren Buffett, but every man has his day, and the time may finally have come for the Sage of Omaha to spend more time with his ukulele.
I say this because last week he demonstrably broke one of his first rules of investment, which is never get involved in things you don’t fully understand.
If Mr Buffett seriously thinks that the euro would be strengthened by a Greek exit, which is what he said, then he needs his head examined.
Leaving the euro may or may not be good for Greece in the long run.
Yet it will also surely leave European monetary union even more weakened, unstable and lacking in credibility than it already is, if that was indeed possible.
The moment it becomes possible for a country to leave the euro, the currency transmogrifies from a single monetary region into little more than a system of pegged national exchange rates, which countries can opt in and out of according to need. It is hard to see the point of such a construct, except as a recipe for chaos.
Mr Buffett is also deluding himself if he thinks there are now sufficient firewalls to prevent contagion.
It’s true that very little Greek public debt is now owned by private creditors, making a repeat of the chain reaction of threatened banking defaults that happened in the aftermath of the Lehman’s collapse quite unlikely.
Unfortunately, this has not really defused the problem, but merely transformed into something else. The vast bulk of Greek public debt is now owned either by other Eurozone states on a bilateral basis, or by other official sources — the IMF, the ECB and European Union bail-out funds.
Refusal to pay the €498m due to the IMF next week would mark the point of no return. Italy alone has €40bn out on loan to Greece. Portugal and Ireland, which have also been “programme” countries alongside Greece, have similarly been forced to shoulder their share of the Greek bailouts.
These already cash-strapped nations can ill afford such a loss. An exit/default is therefore likely to be a deeply traumatic event for all involved.
The geopolitical repercussions of an enforced exit threaten to be equally destabilising, with Greece likely to turn to Russia, China and even Iran for succour in the event of European ostracisation.
By the look of it, Greece’s Syriza-led government is fully prepared to take the nuclear option, and unilaterally default in the absence of meaningful concessions.
The European Union seems similarly unprepared to tolerate an alien, revolutionary, Latin American-style government in its midst, almost regardless of any concessions it might offer.
…
ft dot com > Comment >
The Big Read
April 1, 2015 7:27 pm
Emerging markets: The great unravelling
James Kynge and Jonathan Wheatley Developing economies are suffering their biggest capital outflows since the financial crisis
Faced with recession, decade-high inflation, a fiscal crisis and water rationing, more than 1m Brazilians took to the streets last month to protest against corruption and mismanagement in their government. In China, growth is slowing as property prices fall, propelling more than 1,000 iron ore mines toward financial collapse. The patriotic citizens of Russia, meanwhile, are deserting their nation’s banks, switching savings into US dollars.
Such snapshots of growing distress in the world’s largest emerging markets are echoed among many of their smaller counterparts. Several countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are beset by dwindling revenues and rising debts. Even the turbo-powered petroeconomies of the Gulf, hit by a halving in the price of oil over the past six months to $55 a barrel, are moving into a slower lane.
Though these expressions of distress derive from disparate sources, one big and insidious trend is working to forge a common destiny for almost all emerging markets.
The gush of global capital that flowed into their economies in the six years since the 2008-09 financial crisis is in most countries now either slowing to a trickle or reversing course to find a safer home back in developed economies.
Highest outflows since 2009
On an aggregate basis, the 15 largest emerging economies experienced their biggest absolute capital outflow since the crisis in the second half of last year, as a strong US dollar drove emerging market currencies into a swoon and investors grew nervous over the prospect of a tightening in US monetary policy, according to data compiled by ING. At the same time, low commodity prices slammed GDP growth rates across the developing world.
These trends, analysts say, signal a “great unravelling” of an emerging markets debt binge that has swollen to unprecedented dimensions. Importantly, the pain inflicted by this capital flight is being felt beyond financial markets in the real economies of vulnerable countries and in a surging number of emerging market corporations that are forecast to default on their debts.
“Certain parts of the world are looking really vulnerable,” says Maarten-Jan Bakkum, senior emerging market strategist at ING Investment Management. “Places like Brazil, Russia, Colombia and Malaysia, that rely heavily on commodity exports, are going to get hit even harder, while those countries that have borrowed most excessively like Thailand, China and Turkey also look risky.”
…
On April 2, 2015, the Baltic Dry Index fell to 588 points, down 8 points (1.34%) against the level of April 1.
BDI is a number issued daily by the London-based Baltic Exchange. Not restricted to Baltic Sea countries, the index provides “an assessment of the price of moving the major raw materials by sea.
Taking in 23 shipping routes measured on a timecharter basis, the index covers Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize dry bulk carriers carrying a range of commodities including coal, iron ore and grain. Because dry bulk primarily consists of materials that function as raw material inputs to the production of intermediate or finished goods, the index is also seen as an efficient economic indicator of future economic growth and production.
…
Iron ore miners told Chinese steel growth forecasts too bullish
Date
April 4, 2015
Peter Ker
Resources reporter
Predictions that Chinese steel production will peak at 1 billion tonnes are unrealistic, BHP’s former iron ore boss has said. Photo: Louie Douvis
Australian iron ore miners need to accept their long-held forecasts for Chinese steel growth are likely to be too optimistic, according to the former iron ore president of BHP Billiton.
Speaking after the price of iron ore slumped again to just $US47.08 per tonne, Ian Ashby said he had not expected to see iron ore prices plumb these depths until after 2020.
“With the price in the $US40s I’m shocked, but I’m not shocked by the volatility because the market is trying to find itself,” he said. “If you go back and look at the cycles, whichever commodity they are in, generally the price will overshoot big time on the high side, and then it will fall off a cliff.”
Mr Ashby headed up BHP’s iron ore division during the absolute peak of iron ore prices between 2006 and 2012, and he said the slowdown in China had not been fully appreciated.
“The wall of supply has hit. My concern would be that I don’t think the slowdown in China has been fully analysed with respect to what it means for steel demand and I also think that there is going to have to be some ‘fessing up soon by certain companies that the demand they’ve projected into the future is not going to materialise,” he said.
Rio Tinto and BHP have long predicted that China’s steel industry would peak at 1 billion tonnes sometime between 2020 and 2030, and both companies have reaffirmed that view in recent months.
“You look at the top four companies and you will probably still see them all still saying it is going to be 1 billion tonnes somewhere around that time period, the evidence at the moment is that it’s flat or going backwards at about 900 million if not less, with an economy that has shifted and just pure demand falling away,” said Mr Ashby.
The comments echo the thoughts of China Iron and Steel Association deputy secretary Li Xinchuang, who in September warned that steel production in China would not reach 1 billion tonnes.
“Over the next 10 years, according to our studies, China’s steel production can be over 800 million tonnes for a long time, but it cannot go over 900 million tonnes,” he said in September during a visit to Melbourne.
He expanded on the comments last month, saying that Chinese steel production had officially peaked at 823 million tonnes in 2014, and would slip to 814 million tonnes in 2015.
Iron ore industry veteran Russell Tipper, the former chief executive of Brockman Mining, said Chinese steel would continue to grow, but at a more gradual pace.
Mr Tipper, who has worked for Aquila Resources, Rio Tinto and BHP in his career, said he was surprised that the price slide had not claimed more scalps in the Chinese mining industry. “The only thing I can’t reconcile is the lack of a supply response in the Chinese iron ore industry,” he said.
Earlier this decade, conventional wisdom in the Australian iron ore sector suggested that Chinese iron ore mines were losing money with iron ore at about $US110 per tonne, with the price expected to remain above that level in the longer term. The price slide over the past year appears to have disproved that theory.
“There can’t be many iron ore mines in China profitable at this price,” said Mr Tipper.
Most pundits believe that Rio Tinto and BHP are the only profitable iron ore miners in Australia at current prices, with the 14 per cent fall in the iron ore price over the past week likely to have pushed Fortescue into the red, where Atlas Iron and Mount Gibson have likely been for several months now.
Mr Ashby said Fortescue did a great job building its export business in such a short time, but it may have pushed its debt-funded growth strategy “one step too far”. Fortescue had net debt of $US7.47 billion at December 31, with the bulk due to be repaid in 2019.
Mr Ashby said if current market conditions were to persist, Fortescue would have no choice but to start selling assets.
“I think the capital markets are closed for them,” he said. “They are not going to survive without doing something and I don’t think they are going to get any debt relief, so I think they are going to have to sell some of their assets down.”
Mr Ashby said he expected Fortescue to sell down stakes in mines rather than its port and rail infrastructure.
“This is an infrastructure game, so the infrastructure has the value at the end because the predators will be out there, the BHP Billitons will be out there in ten years time,” he said. “So I don’t think they are going to sell down the infrastructure, if it were me I would be selling down the mineral resources.”
Iron ore prices have now fallen 34 per cent since January 1, and 60 per cent since they were $US119.82 per tonne in April 2014.
Both Mr Tipper and Mr Ashby dismissed suggestions there was an organised push within China to drive the price down, saying that the various steel mills and provincial governments had never been able to organise themselves into a united push.
…
Darrell Delamaide’s Political Capital
Opinion: Greek crisis nears a turning point
By Darrell Delamaide
Published: Mar 27, 2015 3:30 a.m. ET
Will Syriza stand up to Europe, or knuckle under?
AFP/Getty Images
Alexis Tsipras campaigned with passion. Now that he’s leading Greece, does he still have it?
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The simmering crisis in Greece has the potential to become one of those seemingly small events that leads to big consequences.
The election of a radical government by a public exhausted from five years of debilitating recession, the war of words conducted by that government in the face of the iron fist of establishment power in the European Union, and the expected resolution either in the form of a total retreat by the Greek government and its collapse or an exit from the euro — all this seems relatively small on the scale of global events.
But few expected the assassination of an Austrian royal heir to start World War I, or the shelling of a military depot in Gdansk by German forces in 1939 to lead to the conflagration of World War II, or, for that matter, the strike in 1980 by Polish trade union Solidarity in that same port city to lead to the unraveling of the Soviet empire.
Who thinks this can end well? Who knows what the consequences will be?
The Greek crisis could well become a similar turning point in history.
…
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Katy, TX List Prices Dive 6% YoY As Oil Bust Spreads
http://www.zillow.com/katy-tx/home-values/
Inventory shortage is hurting Sacramento’s residential real estate market, Zillow says.
With housing demand down 11% YoY in Sacramento, you might want to reframe your message Jingle_Fraud.
http://files.zillowstatic.com/research/public/State/State_Turnover_AllHomes.csv
Sure, HA!
I mean who should we believe, a self appointed housing analyst.. ..or one who really works in the industry and does the analysis?
HA, Ha, ha, hahshahaha…..
Your beef is with Zillow Jingle_Fraud. Take it up with them.
No worries. Water shortage will be boon to the housing. I am predicting 10% rise in housing in Kali this week alone.
The only thing the Easter Bunny brings to loanowners are heartaches, headaches, and a bottomless pile of bills
Loosers
we need to do another round of QE so we can afford to keep importing chinese goods. They make us stuff as we print money, pretty cool.
Speaking of Easter bunnies, it is wise avoid the black jelly beans.
I think the goon means losers. Looser is what you become after you visit his pot store!
People with mortgages can never go here:
http://www.picpaste.com/IMG_20150405_120203-cYrQm9aY.jpg
Never
I thought it was free to climb up a mountain.
It is but exhaustion sets in before ever hoofin’ it outta the donkey crater.
This one?
http://goo.gl/K0LSsm
For years we have used looser for loser on this blog,nhonestly I cannot remember how it started but using it shows that you have been reading this blog for a long time.
We use “looser” around here alot.
…or just smoke a lot of pot and confuse the two!
“Falling land prices are hurting local businesses”
http://kimt.com/2015/04/01/falling-land-prices-are-hurting-local-businesses/
Falling prices helps everyone else.
We’ve covered the farmland bubble here for years:
‘Farmland values have fallen dramatically across the Hawkeye state. According to new market reports, land prices are down about 15 percent and are only expected to continue to drop.’
‘Jeff Paullus, the general manager for Brakke Implement in Mason City, tells us they have already seen this decline make an impact on their business. “Our new equipment is not going down in price,” he explains, “so the producers are faced with higher prices and then lower the prices from what he sells so, he’s not spending quite as much.”
‘Paullus says that over the last 12 to 18 months, they have seen business fall by roughly 50 percent because of weakening land prices, but he says he’s optimistic about things bouncing back. “We’ll get through this, it’s is just a cycle,” he says.’
Down 15%? How much did it go up the past 10 or 15 years? How many billions in wall street money was bidding land up?
This isn’t part of a cycle. You can thank the central banks, as one wheel comes off after another.
Speaking of farmland, I finally got a chance to see the flick Interstellar last night. Very good movie, although it jumped the shark in the last 40 minutes (long movie) and then came back with a great ending.
Interesting parallels to the Dust Bowl, which was part of the Depression that ended the bubble of the early 20th century. Great artistic commentary on mis-use of science, overpopulation, globalization and political correctness.
As we discussed many times years ago, when you can gross $300 or so per acre, with a lot of hard work, machinery and chemicals, farm land as a business isn’t worth more than $1,000 per acre. The rest is bubble.
Even $1k/acre is double historic prices.
Come on out of California, Skye. Almonds here gross $6,000 per acre. Don’t worry about the drought, just drill the well deeper and suck the water out faster than your neighbor does.
Here’s 66 acres of almonds for only $2.3 million. $400k gross on $2.3 mil, even comes with its own well, what could go wrong?
http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/19157482/9999-Romero-Road-Gustine-CA/
Almond farms are selling for $25,000/acre. They will be back to $5,000/acre soon.
$5k/acre is $4500 overpriced and a fraaaaaaaaud.
Large chunks of Red Mountain (wine AVA) have been bought recently in the $50K/acre price-range (I heard of two separate ~500-acre plot sales).
If you crop it at 3 tons/acre, you could gross about $9K/acre—and some growers crop at closer to 7 tons/acre. Not super-clear to me what the expense side of the ledger is for management, crews to prune/crop/harvest, etc. But I’ll ask a friend who owns a plot there.
Vineyards in the Finger Lakes are overpriced too.
$3k/ton for grape crush? You’re deluded. Worse yet, once the expenses are paid it’s barely break even.
You don’t know jack. The price for grapes in Washington State is set by a grower’s association (essentially a cartel), and it is stable at $1.50/lb for high-quality wine grapes. I know—because I pay it.
I grew up in ag my friend. You’re pimping retail by the pound prices for grape crush.
“$50K/acre price-range…”
We wonder if that is a practical price! You would need to net 1/10 of that each year for it to pencil out. For $20K/acre here in the Finger Lakes you get producing vines, an actual wine production facility, a restaurant, a retail facility, a recognized brand and good will.
The question of what Midwest flat land fit for cattle or corn/oats/hay/pasture is worth is not answered by what high end producing vineyards fetch. Also, the wine mania is quite alive and kicking.
I looked at a piece of cleared land, in grass, 100 acres right on the same lake view slope as the local famous wineries. It was priced at $1000/acre. No vines, no facilities. It sold for cattle pasture. The farmers around here buy land because the price always goes up and will pay several thou an acre on that basis, not on what it will produce. Menonites even, and with borrowed money. I doubt the basic math has changed since I sold my farm.
I grew up in ag my friend. You’re pimping retail by the pound prices for grape crush.
You are truly clueless. I see the invoices that show tons, not pounds. I used pounds only because that is more familiar to most folks.
But stick with your fantasy land. And then call a few growers and ask for prices yourself. You can apologize later.
Also, the wine mania is quite alive and kicking.
Oh, +1, I totally agree, Blue. I was merely indicating what reality is today, and I do suspect that this asset-class is Fed-bubble-induced at the moment.
I sure hope it doesn’t last, at least… I happen to know that 15yrs ago, that $50K/acre was $3500/acre.
Is it a bubble? Sure looks like it to me. Will it deflate? I suspect so. When? God only knows.
“I see the invoices”
Right. Prove this fantasy. Redact the invoice and post it. GO~!
It’s already falling my friend.
Seattle, WA Sellers Slash List Prices 22% YoY On Plunging Housing Demand
http://www.zillow.com/seattle-wa-98101/home-values/
Right. Prove this fantasy. Redact the invoice and post it. GO~!
And will you agree to eat the crow, after I roast it and put it on the plate for you?
What’s really interesting is that a 15% drop in land prices translated into a 50% drop in this man’s businesss. What will happen if/when the price of land really crashes?
The economy recovers.
What happens if the farmland bubble and the oil bubble pop concurrently?
“Dry Bulk Prices Keep Falling, But Buyers Remain Scarce”
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/dry-bulk-prices-keep-falling-but-buyers-remain-scarce/
Falling prices are your wallets best friend and good for the economy.
Crushing.Housing.Losses.
You paid too much for a depreciating asset. Millions did.
you work a job.
rich people sit back and watch their assets go up in price and then hire people like you to make them richer.
Thats the class envy we have going on.
You are a debt donkey.
You will work for decades just to get your nose above water. That sitting back and watching “assets” crumble must be an uncomfortable situation these days.
I take advantage of leverage. I like using your money to gamble in the casino.
You’re letting that envy get the best of you $hithousePoet.
That’s class resentment of the means used to rig the game (i.e. buying political influence) to loot the wealth of others. Corruption and greed. That is why bottoms are good.
A large part of rigging the game is taking the middle class hostage, and making damn sure that the middle class gets hit harder than the rich do. Bottoms are good only for the rich.
Paying inflated prices is good Donk?
Cmon now.
Oxide, that’s not true. Those who invested in Ben’s Joshua Tree fund were not rich. Ben is not rich. It’s all about how you play the cards you’re dealt.
Know when to hold em, know when to fold em. It’s a country Easter on the HBB.
“Bucks County Realtor Charged With $643K Fraud”
http://www.phillymag.com/news/2015/04/02/bucks-county-realtor-charged-with-643k-fraud/
I tried to report some fraud being perpetrated with respect to some of the shenanigans going on in my development, but the agency just came back and told me that unless I could provide the documents I told them to check, they could not do anything. They had no power to investigate. The system is designed to protect the fraud.
CraterRage™ Photo Of The Day
http://goo.gl/hyOmaK
People with mortgages do not get to ski at Arapahoe Basin because they are BROKE
http://www.picpaste.com/IMG_20150405_075616-W0USQaE7.jpg
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/what-on-earth-is-happening-in-dubai-property-market–587748.html
‘There is only one conclusion to come to from all this, which is that wherever you look, whatever kind of property you look at, prices are falling. But the really big question is whether all this is a softening, a bigger correction, or even the start of another crash.’
‘there is actually plenty to be optimistic about…True, in recent months quite a few property speculators may have got badly burned. But that’s not a bad thing is it?’
It is amazing that no matter in the world you go the same elements are present, one constant is that all the bubble areas consider themselves immune from a correction, an excerpt from the link:
As every expert I speak to tells me, it’s all about “location, location, location.” So let’s look at a few locations, starting with the Palm Jumeirah. Apartment sale prices there along the coveted Shoreline (based on current listed prices) are generally down around 20 percent against 18 months ago. Assuming the drop is the same on actual transaction prices, that’s a hefty fall. Downtown Dubai, which we are constantly being told is immune, is also experiencing falls. Some parts of the developments are 10 percent down over the same period. Dubai Marina sale prices — again, I’m basing these on our database of listed prices that we monitor — look to have slipped between 10-15 percent.
we need a crash to flush the speculators but the bankers dont want to take haircuts and will print as much as they can to keep asset prices high.
It doesn’t seem to be working. Worse yet, demand continues to plummet to multi decade lows.
Immunity to price declines is a mentality common to manias. Sure, it makes no sense later, but is a given at the time. From the desk clearing post:
‘Downtown Boston saw condo sales drop by a quarter through the end of February, while the median price edged down 14 percent to $757,500…the median sales price in Manhattan was $970,000 during the first quarter of 2015, compared with $980,000 last quarter. The luxury segment saw its median sales price drop 10.6 percent to $5.1 million. There were also nearly 20 percent fewer luxury sales…CMBS lenders and investors are now worried low oil prices will leave them facing foreclosures and heavy losses. Many are declining to funnel more cash into once-hot areas in North Dakota and Texas…Public and private home prices across Singapore kept falling in the first quarter of this year, with further declines expected…For those of you looking to hop onto the property bandwagon in Dubai, waste no time; it’s currently a buyer’s market. Brigitte Tenbergen, a luxury sales specialist at LuxHabitat, a luxury real estate brokerage in Dubai, said: ‘It’s definitely a buyer’s market emerging in Dubai as prices have been dropping by almost 15 to 20 per cent since the peak of prices on luxury properties’
What’s more, there are tens of thousands of units being built in Dubai. And Toronto, and China, and Dallas, and San Francisco and Miami. Etc.
“Immunity to price declines is a mentality common to manias.”
If I committed every last hour of my labor for the next 30 years to a depreciating asset at a grossly inflated price, I’d be in denial at this point too.
When you hear words like immunity, it should set off alarm bells. A lack of fear about ever higher prices shows that this isn’t a cycle. In a cycle, there is a knowledge that prices will decline. In a mania, this is discarded in favor of a new paradigm. What’s amazing to me is they can talk of immunity in Dubai, when it just crashed a few years ago! BTW, they aren’t selling condos in Dubai with 3% down.
“it just crashed a few years ago”
There is no logic in a mania.
“It is amazing that no matter in the world you go the same elements are present,”
Heh. It’s the New World Dis-Order.
Heh. It’s the New World Dis-Order.
Heh. Well put.
“prices are falling.”
Yessirree.
FAIL !!!
Fixt for you Poet.
FAILFALL !!!you serfs need to support wall street and the bankers by buying into the recovery and buying stocks and homes. Don’t listen to paranoid bloggers who missed out on this major stock and home appreciation.
And farmland. Buy farmland. Leverage as many purchases as you can, leverage to the max.
Leverage is my friend, and leverage can be your friend too.
I borrowed 10,000.00 on my margin account to buy some more facebook and twitter shares. I cant wait for the opening tomorrow so I can BTFD.
Mr. Banker, since Amazon seems to be selling everything today, will they become a banker too?http://motoring.iafrica.com/features/988945.html
I was wondering about and searching out the reason how American Homes 4 Rent can get away with its off balance sheet transactions and I happened to run across this:
“Liabilities - Types Of Off-Balance-Sheet Financing
“Many economic transactions and events are not recognized in the financial statements because they do not qualify as accounting assets or transactions under GAAP standards. That said, these unreported assets and liabilities have real cash flow consequences. As a result, it is important to be able to identify and qualify these assets and liabilities.”
And one of these economic transactions is:
“The sale of accounts receivables - A company may sell its receivables to an unrelated third party to reduce its debt and improve its financial position. Most sales of receivables provide the buyer with a limited recourse to the seller. However, the recourse provision is generally well above the expected loss ratio on the receivables (allowance for doubtful accounts). The potential liability associated with the buyer-recourse provision is not displayed on the balance sheet.”
http://www.investopedia.com/exam-guide/cfa-level-1/liabilities/off-balance-sheet-financing-types.asp
And this is what AMH is doing, it is selling off its receivables - its future income from rents - to third parties by bundling them up and tranching them.
And this does not show up on the company’s balance sheet but it sure does show up on the cash flow statement.
Go here for a peek at AMH’s Cash Flow statement:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=AMH+Cash+Flow&annual
Allow your eyes to settle on the term “Other Cash Flows From Financing Activities”. Note the entry of $1,493,724. Add three zeros to this sum and you will end up with a sum of almost one-and-a-half billion dollars; This is the amount of money AMH received last year from three off balance sheet transactions and, IMO, these three transactions act to distort - greatly distort - the true picture of what is actually going on with this company, financial wise.
Something to think about: If I were to decide to put my money in a company that promised to pay me dividends out of future income - in this case future rental income - shouldn’t I be a bit concerned if somebody else gets first dibs and healthy portions of this future income?
BTW, AMH’s Cash Flow statement shows net income for last year as being a NEGATIVE $33,092,000 but nevertheless the company was able to pay out $82,507,000 in dividends.
If you have to ask how this is possible then you should contact me and ask me about maybe purchasing some Arizona beach property I may be willing to sell to you.
And one more thing …
There is a lot of noise about these housing-investment-type companies cashing in in their rise in values (aka rise in prices) by selling into the rising market but … but … but how can they sell if they are committed to paying out rental income to debtors?
Any profits from the sales would have to go to the buyers of the debt.
(Maybe. Did I mention that the debts have been securitized and that they have been … have been tranched? And that some tranches carry higher risks that other tranches?)
Stay tuned …
Furthermore, The Company has employees (including executive employees) who earn salaries that are deducted from the various sheets before any profits get gained. If these salaries amount to, say, oh, millions in a year, or more millions in a couple years, then WHO CARES?
These companies are the endeavor of a group of people who desire to make a profit. If they can make the “Big Score” - make enough money so that their grandchildren don’t have to work - they’re going to do it.
If that means running the company aground, it’s a no-brainer - do it. The company is a mere logical construct, a front for individual activities.
Additionally, if this company is intricately tied with at least one other financial company, then it poses ’systemic risk’ and has an implicit government guarantee.
At that point, “monetary redistribution” comes into play. They’re selling worthless constructs they claim to be worth $X. Someone buys those constructs. Constructs are discovered to be worthless, company implodes, taking at least one other company with it. Government steps in and pays full price for all of its constructs, none of which had any value.
Government does this through borrowing or working with the central bank to print money (eventually).
And wham - purchasing power is transferred from the population to those holding outlandishly valued company financial products, by ever so slight currency devaluation through borrowing and then printing.
They are selling their debt to collection agencies. Not a good sign.
I meant to say they are selling their income to collection agencies. But wait, didn’t they already sell it in the form of bonds? They are using bonds to finance the mortgages, and the bonds are backed by rents, but the rents belong to a collection agency.
The collection agency must make more than is normally lost to delinquencies. Otherwise, it would not be in business.
Did the bond owners know this when they leant their money to the group? Do the bond owners realize that they are not first in line to receive rental profits? Do they realize that they invested in a company this inefficiently outsourcing its normal business operations to subcontractors?
This is too many layers. Real estate isn’t usually profitable enough to cover all that.
Here’s why I avoid homeowner’s associations: even if the HOA has a set of reasonable officers, there can be a hyper busybody who uses lawsuits to get in your business and tell you what you can’t do with your own property.
http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/eldorado-woman-in-chicken-fight-now-targeting-owners-of-ground/article_65519f9a-0321-51d0-9b95-d1ef9706588e.html
Thank you for flying Cloward-Piven Airline
1:40 of this 1:47 clip is great
“Uh the price tag? I don’t know. I don’t know!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2z1ElTSY68 - 207k -
18 hours ago
interesting pictures of homes surrounded by sand walls they might as well be in iraq
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/us/california-drought-tests-history-of-endless-growth.html
California is not over. It will survive the water deal. But it will get more and more expensive so that only 1% and the serfs on welfare or doing manual labor and getting tax breaks for their large impoverished family can live there.
There will be continued relocation of thousands of employees of large companies to other states as offices close.
People waste so much here it is mind boggling. Some simple choices would save a lot. The mindset most of the time is , if I dont use it someone else will.
It’s amazing how many comments I have seen from people who say they will still have a green lawn no matter what. It’s more of a “God given right” to Californians than owning 30 round magazines is to Arizonans. There will be many who will take the risk of being thrown in a cage for wasting water so that they can have a frigging green lawn.
A colleague of mine lives in Anaheim Hills. I overheard him talking with another colleague about the water deal. This A.H. guy basically says he will keep his green yard. He planted his lawn in the 70s there and took great care of it for over 40 years so he will continue to keep it green. Let’s see Mr. Jerry Brown’s fascist rules take my colleague down.
When I had a house in the high Mojave desert I was into Xeroscaping from day 1. I was proud to use very little water and was proud to try as much as possible to make my landscape blend into the surroundings.
The new rules by the Brown administration are very close to draconian. And it’s not the state of California’s fault for lack of water. It is too many people. Close to 40 million people live/work in California.
If water was privatized like it should have been in the 1970s the population of California would be under 20 million these days. The price of water would rise to its natural price. There would not be these silly green lawns in a desert.
But the market was not allowed to operate and the water has been subsidized to the Californians for too dam long.
The chickens are coming home to roost. Either water will become privatized or the state of California is going to find a way to add significant costs to water some other way and there will be a lot of people deciding it’s no longer worth the high price. Most of these are the household incomes between $100,000 and $300,000 (two breadwinners in a household). The backbone of the California revenue.
The new water rules are going to be made permanent, whether or not a few wet years will fill the reservoirs and aquifers. So the costs will be locked in and the middle class will start bailing.
The California real estate prices should be cratering.
If water was privatized like it should have been in the 1970s the population of California would be under 20 million these days.
So how is that when the private sector raising prices to find supply/demand equilibrium it’s “freedom” but when the government does it, it’s “fascism”?
And FWIW, residential water has been damn expensive in California as long as I can remember. When Cali friends visit us I love to show them our water and other utility bills. They think I’m BS’ing them, because it couldn’t possibly be that cheap, especially when they see my huge emerald green Kentucky bluegrass lawn.
Our LLs were way out ahead of the water rationing…converted all except the smallish front yard lawn to wood chip cover over a year ago.
This saved us a bundle on watering and them a bundle on lawn care — real estate investing done right!
So how is that when the private sector raising prices to find supply/demand equilibrium it’s “freedom” but when the government does it, it’s “fascism”?
The same reason that a pair of good quality Nike shoes is sold at such a high price in the market it’s freedom but if it was raised by government it would be Fascism.
One is through voluntary exchange and the other is at gunpoint. You have the problem if you cannot see the difference between free choice and the threat of force.
Water is a public resource, so people really shouldn’t be allowed to waste it on nonsense (grass and pools) when it’s scarce. If anyone thinks they have the “right” to all the water they desire, then they will need to back that up with a fearless posse and a lot of ammo. This is how it’s always been in the western United States. I am unclears as to why Californians (and Arizonans) have begun to think otherwise.
“…so people really shouldn’t be allowed to waste it on nonsense (grass and pools) when it’s scarce.”
The California drought is a man-made problem, not an act of God. In short, yes water supply is currently low. However, demand is not, and because there are no prices in the centrally planned water allocation system, the market cannot reach equilibrium.
Hence there is a shortage, due to bad policy, not God’s will.
The same reason that a pair of good quality Nike shoes is sold at such a high price in the market it’s freedom but if it was raised by government it would be Fascism.
Nikes are a want, not a necessity that is literally necessary for life.
As for “free markets” in water supply, ever heard of water rights? They can be bought and sold. There is nothing preventing the private sector from getting involved in water distribution. That they don’t bother should be telling.
Water
The drying of the West
Drought is forcing westerners to consider wasting less water
Feb 22nd 2014 | LAKE MEAD, NEVADA | From the print edition
Timekeeper
THE first rule for staying alive in a desert is not to pour the contents of your water flask into the sand. Yet that, bizarrely, is what the government has encouraged farmers to do in the drought-afflicted south-west. Agriculture accounts for 80% of water consumption in California, for example, but only 2% of economic activity. Farmers flood the land to grow rice, alfalfa and other thirsty crops. By one account, over the years they have paid just 15% of the capital costs of the federal system that delivers much of their irrigation water. If water were priced properly, it is a safe bet that they would waste far less of it, and the effects of California’s drought—its worst in recorded history—would not be so
severe.
…
There is a reason why the private sector won’t build pricey desalination plants. If the drought ends those expensive desalination plants will go offline and their investors will lose their shirts. That’s why everyone expects the government to do it.
“If the drought ends those expensive desalination plants will go offline and their investors will lose their shirts.”
The frackin’ A!
The farmers in California must compete on price with produce from Mexico. This is only possible if they are allowed to hire illegal Mexican labor, have access to gratuitous Mexican-style subsidies for water and business loans, and are compensated by the government when farmland is converted into residential housing, thereby pushing the farmers further into the desert.
NAFTA, meet consequences.
“…converted all except the smallish front yard lawn to wood chip cover over a year ago”
They must be hoping for a wildfire insurance bailout.
Either you bring the water to L.A., or you bring L.A. to the water.
californication has a whole ocean at its beck and call yet no plans to build any desalinization plants just in case of an emergency like this…but 100 billion for a kinda useless high speed rail…no problem
Some water shortage, with the entire Pacific Ocean at your back door.
How bizarre is that!?
How many desalination plants will be needed so everyone in Cali-land can flush their toilets and keep their lawns green? How long will it take to build them? How much will it cost to build them? How much energy will it take to run them? How will these plants be fueled? Why hasn’t the private sector jumped in and started building them?
“Why hasn’t the private sector jumped in and started building them?”
My guesses:
1) Energy costs are too high relative to the (subsidized) price of (existing government-provided) water sources.
2) Environmental extremists block development of desalinization technology, due to marine life impacts.
Just guesses! I haven’t explored this much…
Found this:
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Desalination-plants-a-pricey-option-if-drought-5239096.php
“Seventeen plants are in planning stages along the coast to convert salt water from the ocean or bays, including one near Concord that would serve every major water agency in the Bay Area.
That plant is tentatively targeted to open in 2020, but could be kick-started earlier in an emergency, officials say - and once online, would gush at least 20 million gallons a day of drinkable water.”
That would be about 2 gallons per day per Bay Area resident. Not a whole lot. That’s about 1 toilet flush. And we all know that if a mud snake is involved that more than one flush is needed. And that would cost 1 billion to build.
CA is too far into a bankrupt state to build de-sal.
CA is too far into a bankrupt state to build de-sal.
http://carlsbaddesal.com/
They’ll be bankrupt after building RO plants and paying for RO regen year after year. You think taxes are crushing and CA is in debt now? Look out.
Interesting though. Kiewit is the general. Take this job and shove it. I Key Wit!
“That would be about 2 gallons per day per Bay Area resident.”
Sounds like a lot, if that is drinking water added to existing sources.
I’m pretty sure I drink less than 2 toilet bowls of water a day.
Other than the experts on how to chop off the heads of innocent people, Saudi Arabia is well advanced in desalination.
http://www.aawsat.net/2013/07/article55308131/the-desalination-nation
but 100 billion for a kinda useless high speed rail…no problem
It will never get built.
californication
I like California and I like fornication. One is either a Muslim, southern Baptist or a commie to hate both.
Here is an excellent breakdown of Chinese debt, as you can see there are very few consumer debt donkeys. There is very little federal government debt or unsecured debt of any type. What China does have is massive state owned enterprise debt. This is essentially secured by the assets of the corporations and in a free market economy a lot of the debt would be wiped out by selling equity in the corporations. If you look at the private corporations the most productive part of the Chinese economy, they have very little debt. China is at a crossroads, it needs to privatize the SOEs. The Communist party is trying to avoid the truth because losing the SOEs means losing a lot of its power. However, China wants to become a superpower and that will require that it deploy capital more efficiently and it is, no surprise, the capitalist part of its economy that is performing well. Think of the past and present examples, East and West Germany, Pre-1979 China/Taiwan and present N and S Korea:
http://online.barrons.com/articles/SB51367578116875004693704580485093808626482
china has been running a ponzi scheme for years. They print up a bunch of cash and then folks come over here and buy up so cal real estate.
It appears to be a race to the bottom.
The flaw in your logic is the worth of the assets used to secure the debt. If they could transport their empty skyscrapers to Miami, it might work out for them. As it is, they appear to be imploding.
The problem with your logic is the housing debt is a small percentage of the debt. Consumers owe very little due to high down payments and ten year mortgages. The builders had years of obscene profits prior to last year and can sell those houses, just not at the price they want for them. Most of the builders can restructure and pay their debts in full, the few that have run into trouble have been denied permission to sell the assets, not that they did not have assets that were in demand.
Bee. Ess. Consumers in China are borrowing money from loan sharks to get houses that cost 10x their household incomes. But oh, their parents just give them the money so it’s OK, whatever.
“Bee. Ess.”
Consider the source and ignore it.
That’s pretty funny. Nearly $30 Tr in debt and nobody is actually in debt.
Blue, if the assets of a corporation exceed the liabilities it is quite easy to restructure the debts in a bankruptcy. The graphs I provided show that China is in better shape than it was in the 1990s according to debt to assets measures. Consumer debt is very low. The globalists are quite mad about that since leveling the economies of the world is one of the steps to world government. They want China to stop investing and start spending. Reduce the corporate debt by not building or modernizing its factories and create world demand by having its consumers go on a debt driven buying binge. This leveling of wealth is great if you live in Mexico but terrible if you live in the U.S. or Europe. China is already too “rich”, too quick and is an impediment to raising living standards in South America, Africa and the Middle East. They also fear that China could derail the whole one world government movement due to their nationalistic policies. Of course, this leveling does not include a personal leveling of their wealth, people doing God’s work by creating equality of nations deserve their days pay, even if that is one million or more dollars per day.
Well, if you take the Masters of the Universe out of what you said it boils down to assets greater than debts. That could be problematic to analyze if you let the principles value their own assets for you (like our US banks).
Circumstantial evidence suggests things there are approaching a critical state. All the new loans are going to rolling over the old loans. $1 Tr capital flight. Production overcapacity stalls global commodity prices. “A profound correction.” Just to name a few.
Once again, ABQ Ban uses BANKRUPTCY as a “solution” to debt. Either way, someone ends up holding the bag. I guess I shouldn’t expect anything less annoying from a guy who is being paid to make these absurd points.
Who then adds insult to injury through the audacity of pretending not to get paid…
“being paid”
Unlikely IMO.
Wrong target audience.
It is a circus of manias. He’s just run away to the circus.
That’s pretty funny. Nearly $30 Tr in debt and nobody is actually in debt.
Not what I said, what I said is their assets exceed their debts. Take any billionaire and you will that they have hundreds of million probably billions in debts, they are billionaires due to their assets exceeding their liabilities by billions.
Private facility now holding immigration detainees in Bakersfield
By Carol Ferguson, Eyewitness News Published: Apr 3, 2015 at 6:13 PM PDT
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) - Undocumented immigrants are now being housed in a long-closed private correctional facility in Bakersfield.
ICE says this is its only facility in the San Joaquin Valley, and it’s key to meeting some of the agency’s goals.
“This facility will be in compliance with the most rigorous performance-based standards that we impose on our facilities,” ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said. She says the newly-renovated facility will be good for the people held there. “They’ll have access to the best possible conditions, and we’re very pleased about that.”
“We prioritize the use of our detention bed for individuals who are deemed to be public safety threats, and individuals who are thought to be flight risks,” she said. “They may have fairly significant criminal convictions, but I’d like to emphasize that if they would have prior criminal convictions — they have already fulfilled any sentence imposed in these cases.”
Kice said ICE now has an intergovernmental service agreement with the City of McFarland to run Mesa Verde, and the city has a contract with the GEO Group to handle day-to-day operations. A company spokesman has said GEO put some $10 million into the renovations at the facility.
The remodeled site has dorm-style rooms, ICE says, and detainees will have access to an on-site law library, medical clinic and religious services. It also has visitation rooms and recreation areas. The agency says the average cost to house a detainee at Mesa Verde will be $107 a day.
http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/…olding-immigration-detainees-in-Bakersfield-298641591.html - 78k -
‘A Capitol Hill artist made five fake notices of proposed land use signs to place at popular Seattle locations on April Fools’ Day, to make a statement about the aggressive development he feels is changing the character of the city. John Tingley, who goes by the moniker “Tinglr,” said his installation art is called “The Joke’s On Us.”
‘Each sign declared a different project was underway. On a sign at Pike Place Market, he wrote that there would be a “mixed use condo/retail structure including the first of its kind subterranean Whole Foods/Trader Joe’s connected with the new SR-99 tunnel named Cash Hole Foods. With a little room left over for a Pike Place Farmers Market Museum!”
‘Tingley said he wanted to “make everybody think twice about how much development we’re approving in this city, how quickly it’s going up, and what it’s really doing to change the city of Seattle, the personality of Seattle, the heart and soul of Seattle.”
‘The words struck a chord with Nate Berendz. The sign he read described the new project as “another f—king concrete box. Maybe we’ll dress it up with some corrugated siding. What’s that ‘you say?’ ‘Not another boring eye-sore!’ That’s too bad. This is the most cost-effective way to build and you know we’re gonna get ours.”
‘Berendz said, “I feel like I see a sign, two weeks later I see a hole, two weeks later I see some new condos…I think it’s a statement that this neighborhood is being covered by concrete boxes.”
‘At Cal Anderson Park, a sign announced a project called “Entitlement Land,” with a Starbucks Frappuccino fountain and Tom Douglas restaurant called Serious Dogg. It would be protected by Amazon.com security drones. Jonathan Ross, who said he reads real land use action signs frequently, said, “You know you’d always see, like 54 units! No parking proposed.”
‘At the bottom of each sign, Tingley wrote that it doesn’t matter what anyone says. The builder will continue anyway.’
when condos start selling you know the end is near. Thats what happened last time. People were so desperate to get in on the action that even apartments started selling units off. You had owners who were paying twice as much as the renters were paying each month.
That’s correct Poet. Rental rates are half the carrying costs of a mortgage at this point.
how many coors lights did your pour today?
Data Poet data!
Seattle, WA List Prices Plunge 22% As Housing Demand Plummets To 20 Year Low
http://www.zillow.com/seattle-wa-98101/home-values/
They should be required to include parking with all units, with special bicycle parking for the Frapuccino eaters. But seriously, I say “Build, build, BUILD!” Build until the prices go so low that I can buy me another rent house with the change in my pocket. Build it.
A) Debt limit topped out
B) Collapsing demand for all items
C) Unemployment at multi decade highs
D) Cracking and cratering prices
:shrug:
Things are selling quite well around here. all these mellenials are under pressure to buy a house and be somebody.
nada
I have been watching the Florida Real Estate fraud here for two years since my Mother died and left me some money. It was a nice sum but not enough to buy a house and pay for my daughters college education so I have to be careful because it disqualifies us from college financial aid and I have been unable to develop sufficient income in this economy.
At the bottom, the SFH units in my development were tax appraised at $80,000. Some developers came in an bought up some of the units, one next door to me where one moved in. It had been empty for over a year and was in foreclosure. She was a realtor and had owned it. They were thugs and stacked their trash outside my front door in their narrow side yard so that their unit appeared to have a nice clean back yard and garage and they trespassed through my yard to access it. When I complained to the authorities, they vandalized my property and menaced me. It caused problems with my landlord and I am sure they intended to low ball her an offer if I moved out. It was a very bad time for me as I did not take my mothers passing very well. I did eventually get a “No Trespass” order on them and backed it up with video monitors.
The thugs got it out of foreclosure and sold it to an individual around tax appraisal price. They remained in the house and did some rehab. Then it was sold at an inflated price to a company and transferred multiple times to a company called SWAY 2014-1 Borrowers, LLC http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2fuz53/sway-2014-1-borrower-llc
They have several other units in the development. There were also a couple of other sales to another company and one last high dollar sale of $175,000 to an individual last August 2014. And then not another sale. Now this is all in Boynton Beach with a 12% delinquency and 15% under water.
So far, the units they have appear to be rented but some have had multiple different tenants so I am wondering if they have discounted rates. The unit next to me was rehabed and sold in July 2014 and rented out in October 2014 to a young couple with 2 kids. I hope they have discounted rent.
I think I am going to take Harry Dent’s advice and hold off on buying anything right now, unless I can get someone to take me up on a lowball offer.
Interesting. Seems to be a whole lot of fraud going on there too. Stay safe. You and your daughter.
If you put the money in an IRA does it still count against school financial aid?
There must be a way to disguise the inheritance. If recent reports of rising inventory are true, then you should hopefully have an affordable house soon. Maybe you can buy it from on of the institutions that owns so many in your neighborhood.
Report: Solar Energy Subsidies Cost $39 Billion Per Year
Solar makes up only 0.6 percent of total U.S. electricity generation
BY: Elizabeth Harrington
February 12, 2015 12:55 pm
“In spite of government’s best efforts to encourage innovation by solar energy companies and encourage Americans to rely more heavily on solar electricity, solar power continues to be a losing proposition,” the report said. “American taxpayers spent an average of $39 billion a year over the past 5 years financing grants, subsidizing tax credits, guaranteeing loans, bailing out failed solar energy boondoggles and otherwise underwriting every idea under the sun to make solar energy cheaper and more popular. But none of it has worked.”
“Congress needs to stop these massive subsidies that are siphoning $39 billion a year from taxpayers,” he said. “If solar is ever going to be a viable energy source and industry, they need to wean themselves off the public dole.”
“Solar energy’s day in the sun may yet come, but taxpayers should not be forced to foot the cost associated with turning the failing industry around,”
freebeacon.com/issues/report-solar-energy-subsidies-cost-39-billion-per-year/ - 92k -
According to wikipedia, the combined US subsidies for all forms of renewal energy in 2013 was 7.3 billion, and that 3.2 billion was spent to subsidize fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel companies probably pay a multiple of ten times more in taxes than they receive renewal energy sources receive greater subsidies than they pay.
ABQ Ban, if the fossil-fuel vendors pay 10x more in taxes than they receive in subsidies, then why are they receiving subsidies in the first place? Should they be weaned, or is it all about political back-scratching and propping up prices?
The development of renewable energy is on par with scientific research. It actually IS the role of government to fund that sort of thing, since our society relies on it for long-term success.
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Solar energy receives 1,212 times more government subsidies per megawatt than fossil fuels
Wind and solar get the most taxpayer help for the least production.
The nearby chart shows the assistance that each form of energy for electricity production received in 2010. The natural gas and oil industry received $2.8 billion in total subsidies, not the $4 billion Mr. Obama claims on the campaign trail, and $654 million for electric power. The biggest winner was wind, with $5 billion. Between 2007 and 2010, total energy subsidies rose 108%, but solar’s subsidies increased six-fold and wind’s were up 10-fold.
The best way to compare subsidy levels is by the amount of energy produced. But the Energy report conspicuously left out this analysis, though Congress specifically requested it.
Energy said that “caution” should be used in calculating the taxpayer handouts “relative to their share of total electricity generation,” because many wind and solar subsidies are for “facilities that are still under construction.” It also warned that “Focusing on a single year’s data does not capture the imbedded effects of subsidies that may have occurred over many years” for other energy sources.
This sounds suspiciously like a political dodge, because subsidies for renewable energy date to at least the 1970s. The problem is that wind and solar still can’t make a go of it without subsidies. Solyndra is merely the most famous of the solar-power failures. Earlier this month United Technologies sold its more than $300 million investment in wind power, with CFO Greg Hayes telling investors, according to press reports that: “We all make mistakes.” He added that the market for renewables like wind “as everyone knows, is stagnating.” Someone alert the White House.
The folks at the Institute for Energy Research used the Energy Department data to calculate a subsidy per unit of electricity produced. Per megawatt hour, natural gas, oil and coal received 64 cents, hydropower 82 cents, nuclear $3.14, wind $56.29 and solar a whopping $775.64.
So for every tax dollar that goes to coal, oil and natural gas, wind gets $88 and solar $1,212. After all the hype and dollars, in 2010 wind and solar combined for 2.3% of electric generation—2.3% for wind and 0% and a rounding error for solar. Renewables contributed 10.3% overall, though 6.2% is hydro. Some “investment.”
hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/08/solar-energy-receives-1212-times-more.html - 177k -
“Solar energy receives 1,212 times more government subsidies per megawatt than fossil fuels
Wind and solar get the most taxpayer help for the least production.”
Who is on the take?
All energy companies are on the public dole, including coal plants.
PUC president opposes reconsidering San Onofre cost agreement
San Onofre
An agreement to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station assigns approximately $3.3 billion of the costs to ratepayers in Southern and Central California and $1.4 billion to two utilities.
(Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)
By Marc Lifsher contact the reporter
The settlement avoided years of prolonged legal battles, Picker said.
The president of the scandal-rocked Public Utilities Commission has rejected a call from a powerful lawmaker to reopen a financial settlement that apportioned nearly $5 billion in costs for the June 2013 permanent closure of the damaged San Onofre nuclear power plant.
In letter to the PUC last month, Lakewood Democratic Assemblyman Anthony Rendon, the chairman of the Utilities and Commerce Committee, said “it is imperative to investigate and scrutinize the entire settlement process” to assure it was “legitimate and uncorrupted.”
On Thursday in a six-page response, PUC President Michael Picker called the settlement “appropriate under the commission’s rules” and “supported by the record developed in the proceeding.”
What’s more, he added, the settlement avoided years of prolonged legal battles while providing some financial relief to ratepayers.
The agreement’s most vocal critic, San Diego consumer attorney Michael Aguirre, immediately denounced Picker’s written comments as “riddled with errors,” based on a flawed record and an exercise in “stonewalling.”
…
COMMENTS
It was a lousy deal for rate payers and tax payers a year ago and it looks even worse today. Knowing what we know now, and really always knew, PUC Chairman Peevey was a shill for the energy utilities having come from among their ranks originally.
…
Hey PB, are you out there? (Of course you are out there; You are always out there.)
A question: Yesterday you made a reference to Enron having a lot of off-balance sheet stuff, do you know if there was a lot of institutional money invested in Enron at that time?
The reason I am asking is because American Homes 4 Rent has a whole lot of institutional money riding on it and I’m just wondering if absolute stupidity is institutionalized.
But maybe if one thinks of Institutional money as OPM then maybe it makes sense. Makes sense not in there not being stupidity but makes sense in that the stupidity lies with the OPM folks and not with the institutions.
Here’s some of the major holders of American Homes 4 Rent:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=AMH+Major+Holders
Well here’s one answer:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/25/business/enron-s-collapse-mutual-funds-many-may-be-surprised-to-be-enron-investors.html
“…many-may-be-surprised-to-be-enron-investors”
Bagholders’R'Us.
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Volume 17, Number 2, Spring 2003, pages 3-26
The Fall of Enron
Paul M. Healy and Krishna G. Palepu
…
Sorry it took a while to respond…I was busy this morning playing for Easter Sunday services at a rock&roll church…
Thanks for your response.
Church services are a lot more fun with rock&roll music to get the congregation up out of their seats, literally dancing in the aisles…
Alaska permanent fund? What is “percent of float”?
Happy Easter, every bunny. May you find dollar bills in your baskets of currency, and never watch them go down a rabbit hole to finance the mortgage on an overpriced debt shack that was a bad egg from the start.
Crater!
May the crater be with you too.
Really a shame that we don’t have national leaders who could deal with problems like these 2 kids.
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
Kentucky’s Andrew Harrison apologizes for obscenity, slur
4:27 p.m. Sunday, April 5, 2015
INDIANAPOLIS — Kentucky guard Andrew Harrison apologized Sunday for directing an obscenity and a racial slur at Wisconsin’s Frank Kaminsky during a postgame news conference at the Final Four.
Harrison muttered “F— that n—-” into a live microphone when another player was asked a question about Kaminsky after Kentucky lost 71-64 to the Badgers Saturday. The loss ruined the Wildcats’ undefeated season; they finished 38-1.
Harrison’s comment came as a reporter asked Kentucky’s Karl-Anthony Towns about defending the 7-foot Kaminsky. He muttered it with his hand in front of his mouth, but the mic picked up the comments.
Social media immediately lit up with tweets about what Harrison said along with video clips, and the program looked into the matter.
Harrison, who is black, didn’t explain why he made the comments about Kaminsky, who is white. But he said in a series of tweets his comments were a “poor choice of words used in jest towards a player I respect and know.”
“When I realized how this could be perceived I immediately called big frank to apologize and let him know I didn’t mean any disrespect,” he added.
He said the two of them had a “good conversation” and he wished him good luck in Monday’s championship game.
Kaminsky confirmed Sunday that Harrison reached out to him, and then the All-America forward quickly dismissed the topic.
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
http://www.ajc.com/…/top-news/kentucky-reviewing-andrew-harrisons-postgame-comme/nknCL/ - 255k -
“Harrison muttered “F— that n—-” into a live microphone when another player was asked a question about Kaminsky after Kentucky lost 71-64 to the Badgers Saturday. The loss ruined the Wildcats’ undefeated season; they finished 38-1.”
What does one racis’ and sore loser have to do with national policy?
It was a black kid saying “F— that n—-” about a white kid so I am not too sure how much “racis’” was involved but if the roles were reversed I am sure it would have been a national firestorm.
And I didn’t say national policy I said problems. They didn’t throw gas on a fire and IMHO it was handled better than other racial issues have been handled by many of our national leaders.
“I immediately called big frank to apologize and let him know I didn’t mean any disrespect,”
“Kaminsky confirmed Sunday that Harrison reached out to him,”
“Nothing needs to be made out of it,” Kaminsky said.
If a black kid dropped the “n” word then it was obviously not racis’ and okey-dokey.
The Outlook
Oil-Price Drop Offers Petro-States Chance to Curb Domestic Demand
Middle East’s voracious energy use, propped up by subsidies, is threatening exports; consumption is ‘out of control’
A fuel station in Saudi Arabia, which has seen an eye-popping, more-than-60-fold increase in domestic energy consumption in the past four decades. Photo: Fahad Shadeed/Reuters
By Bill Spindle
April 5, 2015 3:20 p.m. ET
The sharp drop in oil prices hasn’t been kind to the world’s petro-states, but it has provided an opening to address one of their most pressing economic problems: runaway domestic energy demand.
In the Middle East, the growth in demand is driven in part by expanding populations, as well as a deliberate move into energy-intensive industries such as aluminum and petrochemical production. But a big part stems from the region’s ubiquitous energy subsidies.
Voracious energy use in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran is threatening exports from the most oil-rich region in the world. Failing to restrain this galloping demand could leave global markets more volatile, pressure domestic budgets and eventually nudge prices back up.
The 12 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries have increased domestic energy consumption tenfold in the past four decades, a period in which energy use in the rest of the world has a little more than doubled. Saudi Arabia has seen an eye-popping, more than 60-fold increase in consumption over that period.
As a group, OPEC members—mostly countries in the Middle East and Africa, plus Venezuela and Ecuador—now consume almost as much energy as China, with less than half its population. The Middle East, especially, is expected to account for a major chunk of future global demand growth. Saudi energy use is expected to grow at a 3.8% rate through 2020, according to the International Energy Agency. That’s slower than the country’s 5.7% annual average over the past six years, but well above the expected global average of 1.2%.
Consumption is “out of control,” said Steve Griffiths, an executive director at the Masdar Institute, an energy think tank in Abu Dhabi.
Nearly every country in the Middle East long ago embraced the notion that cheap fuel was essentially a birthright. As a result, energy is all but free in some places, such as Saudi Arabia, where a gallon of gasoline costs 45 cents. Governments pick up the rest of the tab, either paying for imports or forgoing income that could be earned by exporting domestic oil or gas rather than selling it for rock-bottom prices at home.
Most countries have realized that’s not sustainable. Some countries, such as Iran, Nigeria and Venezuela, have already hit that wall: They are unable to maintain their spending on imports to meet demand or balance their budgets without the export revenue they are forgoing to satiate consumers’ growing energy appetite. Iran has made some halting progress in raising prices closer to market levels; Nigeria and Venezuela haven’t.
Slashing subsidies is never easy, with the risk of social turbulence from an unhappy citizenry. The good news: Economists and policy makers point out that the steep drop in oil prices presents a historic opportunity to reel back price supports with minimal or even no immediate adjustment to what consumers pay.
Governments could take the time offered by the reprieve to design policies to construct a stronger social safety net, aiming support at those who need it when prices rise rather than an across-the-board subsidy.
Iran, facing runaway expenditures to import gasoline, has reduced subsidies (and thus raised prices at the pump) twice over the past five years, substituting direct cash payments to all consumers. Elsewhere, Indonesia and India have made similar moves more recently.
But there’s been little progress in other quarters of the Persian Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia, where the problem is particularly acute. The cost of artificially low prices there has ballooned from $5 billion in 2004 to $32 billion last year. Continued growth in Saudi energy use could make the country, now among the world’s largest oil exporters, an importer by 2038, according to Chatham House, a U.K.-based think tank.
Long before that, Saudi Arabia’s ability to hold back on pumping some of its oil—known as “spare capacity”—would disappear as domestic demand grows. That capacity, which can be switched on or off at the country’s whim, is key to its role as king of the world’s oil markets, and has been critical to its ability to smooth out what would otherwise have been some huge market swings.
Ballooning Saudi demand is “going to take away their ability to be the swing producer, to go up or down in production,” according to Jim Krane, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.
That might seem irrelevant today, when the globe is glutted with oil. But as demand catches up to supply—in no small part due to swelling demand growth among Middle Eastern petro-states—the global oil market could become significantly more volatile, he notes.
Some big energy importers—such as Egypt, Indonesia and India—have managed to cut subsidies significantly to head off fiscal disasters. But the major petro-states, beyond Iran and Venezuela, have no budget pressures to focus officials’ minds on overhauls.
Countries like Saudi Arabia, fearful of a social blowback, can tap huge reserves to maintain their subsidies and cover the loss of export revenues. They are focusing on improving energy efficiency and expanding their domestic energy supplies through nuclear power plants.
But that only means energy use will continue to rise—and well above the rate new supply can be added. “Saudi is not a small energy consumer,” said Laura El-Katiri, a research fellow with the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. “What happens to demand there is important to the overall demand picture globally.”
…
Buffett not alone in failing to grasp Grexit dangers
If Mr Buffett seriously thinks that the euro would be strengthened by a Greek exit, which is what he said, then he needs his head examined.
By Jeremy Warner
7:30PM BST 04 Apr 2015
It is hard to think of a nicer and wiser capitalist than Warren Buffett, but every man has his day, and the time may finally have come for the Sage of Omaha to spend more time with his ukulele.
I say this because last week he demonstrably broke one of his first rules of investment, which is never get involved in things you don’t fully understand.
If Mr Buffett seriously thinks that the euro would be strengthened by a Greek exit, which is what he said, then he needs his head examined.
Leaving the euro may or may not be good for Greece in the long run.
Yet it will also surely leave European monetary union even more weakened, unstable and lacking in credibility than it already is, if that was indeed possible.
The moment it becomes possible for a country to leave the euro, the currency transmogrifies from a single monetary region into little more than a system of pegged national exchange rates, which countries can opt in and out of according to need. It is hard to see the point of such a construct, except as a recipe for chaos.
Mr Buffett is also deluding himself if he thinks there are now sufficient firewalls to prevent contagion.
It’s true that very little Greek public debt is now owned by private creditors, making a repeat of the chain reaction of threatened banking defaults that happened in the aftermath of the Lehman’s collapse quite unlikely.
Unfortunately, this has not really defused the problem, but merely transformed into something else. The vast bulk of Greek public debt is now owned either by other Eurozone states on a bilateral basis, or by other official sources — the IMF, the ECB and European Union bail-out funds.
Refusal to pay the €498m due to the IMF next week would mark the point of no return. Italy alone has €40bn out on loan to Greece. Portugal and Ireland, which have also been “programme” countries alongside Greece, have similarly been forced to shoulder their share of the Greek bailouts.
These already cash-strapped nations can ill afford such a loss. An exit/default is therefore likely to be a deeply traumatic event for all involved.
The geopolitical repercussions of an enforced exit threaten to be equally destabilising, with Greece likely to turn to Russia, China and even Iran for succour in the event of European ostracisation.
By the look of it, Greece’s Syriza-led government is fully prepared to take the nuclear option, and unilaterally default in the absence of meaningful concessions.
The European Union seems similarly unprepared to tolerate an alien, revolutionary, Latin American-style government in its midst, almost regardless of any concessions it might offer.
…
How are your emerging market investments holding up these days?
ft dot com > Comment >
The Big Read
April 1, 2015 7:27 pm
Emerging markets: The great unravelling
James Kynge and Jonathan Wheatley
Developing economies are suffering their biggest capital outflows since the financial crisis
Faced with recession, decade-high inflation, a fiscal crisis and water rationing, more than 1m Brazilians took to the streets last month to protest against corruption and mismanagement in their government. In China, growth is slowing as property prices fall, propelling more than 1,000 iron ore mines toward financial collapse. The patriotic citizens of Russia, meanwhile, are deserting their nation’s banks, switching savings into US dollars.
Such snapshots of growing distress in the world’s largest emerging markets are echoed among many of their smaller counterparts. Several countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are beset by dwindling revenues and rising debts. Even the turbo-powered petroeconomies of the Gulf, hit by a halving in the price of oil over the past six months to $55 a barrel, are moving into a slower lane.
Though these expressions of distress derive from disparate sources, one big and insidious trend is working to forge a common destiny for almost all emerging markets.
The gush of global capital that flowed into their economies in the six years since the 2008-09 financial crisis is in most countries now either slowing to a trickle or reversing course to find a safer home back in developed economies.
Highest outflows since 2009
On an aggregate basis, the 15 largest emerging economies experienced their biggest absolute capital outflow since the crisis in the second half of last year, as a strong US dollar drove emerging market currencies into a swoon and investors grew nervous over the prospect of a tightening in US monetary policy, according to data compiled by ING. At the same time, low commodity prices slammed GDP growth rates across the developing world.
These trends, analysts say, signal a “great unravelling” of an emerging markets debt binge that has swollen to unprecedented dimensions. Importantly, the pain inflicted by this capital flight is being felt beyond financial markets in the real economies of vulnerable countries and in a surging number of emerging market corporations that are forecast to default on their debts.
“Certain parts of the world are looking really vulnerable,” says Maarten-Jan Bakkum, senior emerging market strategist at ING Investment Management. “Places like Brazil, Russia, Colombia and Malaysia, that rely heavily on commodity exports, are going to get hit even harder, while those countries that have borrowed most excessively like Thailand, China and Turkey also look risky.”
…
Baltic Dry Index down to 588 points
03.04.2015
On April 2, 2015, the Baltic Dry Index fell to 588 points, down 8 points (1.34%) against the level of April 1.
BDI is a number issued daily by the London-based Baltic Exchange. Not restricted to Baltic Sea countries, the index provides “an assessment of the price of moving the major raw materials by sea.
Taking in 23 shipping routes measured on a timecharter basis, the index covers Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize dry bulk carriers carrying a range of commodities including coal, iron ore and grain. Because dry bulk primarily consists of materials that function as raw material inputs to the production of intermediate or finished goods, the index is also seen as an efficient economic indicator of future economic growth and production.
…
CR8R
Iron ore miners told Chinese steel growth forecasts too bullish
Date
April 4, 2015
Peter Ker
Resources reporter
Predictions that Chinese steel production will peak at 1 billion tonnes are unrealistic, BHP’s former iron ore boss has said. Photo: Louie Douvis
Australian iron ore miners need to accept their long-held forecasts for Chinese steel growth are likely to be too optimistic, according to the former iron ore president of BHP Billiton.
Speaking after the price of iron ore slumped again to just $US47.08 per tonne, Ian Ashby said he had not expected to see iron ore prices plumb these depths until after 2020.
“With the price in the $US40s I’m shocked, but I’m not shocked by the volatility because the market is trying to find itself,” he said. “If you go back and look at the cycles, whichever commodity they are in, generally the price will overshoot big time on the high side, and then it will fall off a cliff.”
Mr Ashby headed up BHP’s iron ore division during the absolute peak of iron ore prices between 2006 and 2012, and he said the slowdown in China had not been fully appreciated.
“The wall of supply has hit. My concern would be that I don’t think the slowdown in China has been fully analysed with respect to what it means for steel demand and I also think that there is going to have to be some ‘fessing up soon by certain companies that the demand they’ve projected into the future is not going to materialise,” he said.
Rio Tinto and BHP have long predicted that China’s steel industry would peak at 1 billion tonnes sometime between 2020 and 2030, and both companies have reaffirmed that view in recent months.
“You look at the top four companies and you will probably still see them all still saying it is going to be 1 billion tonnes somewhere around that time period, the evidence at the moment is that it’s flat or going backwards at about 900 million if not less, with an economy that has shifted and just pure demand falling away,” said Mr Ashby.
The comments echo the thoughts of China Iron and Steel Association deputy secretary Li Xinchuang, who in September warned that steel production in China would not reach 1 billion tonnes.
“Over the next 10 years, according to our studies, China’s steel production can be over 800 million tonnes for a long time, but it cannot go over 900 million tonnes,” he said in September during a visit to Melbourne.
He expanded on the comments last month, saying that Chinese steel production had officially peaked at 823 million tonnes in 2014, and would slip to 814 million tonnes in 2015.
Iron ore industry veteran Russell Tipper, the former chief executive of Brockman Mining, said Chinese steel would continue to grow, but at a more gradual pace.
Mr Tipper, who has worked for Aquila Resources, Rio Tinto and BHP in his career, said he was surprised that the price slide had not claimed more scalps in the Chinese mining industry. “The only thing I can’t reconcile is the lack of a supply response in the Chinese iron ore industry,” he said.
Earlier this decade, conventional wisdom in the Australian iron ore sector suggested that Chinese iron ore mines were losing money with iron ore at about $US110 per tonne, with the price expected to remain above that level in the longer term. The price slide over the past year appears to have disproved that theory.
“There can’t be many iron ore mines in China profitable at this price,” said Mr Tipper.
Most pundits believe that Rio Tinto and BHP are the only profitable iron ore miners in Australia at current prices, with the 14 per cent fall in the iron ore price over the past week likely to have pushed Fortescue into the red, where Atlas Iron and Mount Gibson have likely been for several months now.
Mr Ashby said Fortescue did a great job building its export business in such a short time, but it may have pushed its debt-funded growth strategy “one step too far”. Fortescue had net debt of $US7.47 billion at December 31, with the bulk due to be repaid in 2019.
Mr Ashby said if current market conditions were to persist, Fortescue would have no choice but to start selling assets.
“I think the capital markets are closed for them,” he said. “They are not going to survive without doing something and I don’t think they are going to get any debt relief, so I think they are going to have to sell some of their assets down.”
Mr Ashby said he expected Fortescue to sell down stakes in mines rather than its port and rail infrastructure.
“This is an infrastructure game, so the infrastructure has the value at the end because the predators will be out there, the BHP Billitons will be out there in ten years time,” he said. “So I don’t think they are going to sell down the infrastructure, if it were me I would be selling down the mineral resources.”
Iron ore prices have now fallen 34 per cent since January 1, and 60 per cent since they were $US119.82 per tonne in April 2014.
Both Mr Tipper and Mr Ashby dismissed suggestions there was an organised push within China to drive the price down, saying that the various steel mills and provincial governments had never been able to organise themselves into a united push.
…
Darrell Delamaide’s Political Capital
Opinion: Greek crisis nears a turning point
By Darrell Delamaide
Published: Mar 27, 2015 3:30 a.m. ET
Will Syriza stand up to Europe, or knuckle under?
AFP/Getty Images
Alexis Tsipras campaigned with passion. Now that he’s leading Greece, does he still have it?
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The simmering crisis in Greece has the potential to become one of those seemingly small events that leads to big consequences.
The election of a radical government by a public exhausted from five years of debilitating recession, the war of words conducted by that government in the face of the iron fist of establishment power in the European Union, and the expected resolution either in the form of a total retreat by the Greek government and its collapse or an exit from the euro — all this seems relatively small on the scale of global events.
But few expected the assassination of an Austrian royal heir to start World War I, or the shelling of a military depot in Gdansk by German forces in 1939 to lead to the conflagration of World War II, or, for that matter, the strike in 1980 by Polish trade union Solidarity in that same port city to lead to the unraveling of the Soviet empire.
Who thinks this can end well? Who knows what the consequences will be?
The Greek crisis could well become a similar turning point in history.
…
phony scandals