April 19, 2015

Bits Bucket for April 19, 2015

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

272 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 01:10:28

Is it safe to assume Friday’s very scary day on Wall Street is over, and it is safe to back up the truck and load up with stocks come Monday morning?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 05:47:07

Is Greece fixed? Is China fixed? Are the rising tensions between Sunnis and Shias in the Middle East or the shooting war between Saudi Arabia and its coalition allies, vs. the Iranian-backed Houthis, on the mend? Are Russia and Ukraine still at war?

I’d hold off on loading up at the peak of the bubble, if I were you.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 08:56:42

Hostage crisis 1979, inflation 1970s, Beirut bombing 1983, contra gate 1980s, Cold War, 1970s and 1980s, endless war since 1991, bank crisis 2008, tech stock crash 2000…

And the Vanguard 500 index fund earned an average annual gain of 11% since 1976.

Crisis? Why should we care?

Comment by SUGuy
2015-04-19 09:34:53

There was no zero interest rate policy by the fed back then. The too big to fail banks were not being bailed out.
Corporations were making the money the old fashion and the hard way by earning it and not just by buying back their stocks with cheap debt. There was no financial repression on the general public by the Fed. Crony capitalism was perhaps at a minimum. The regulatory agencies I think did their jobs (as I was too young to care). There were decent manufacturing jobs and other jobs that paid very well. Half of IBM was not staffed by Indians.

And best of all Airlines had sexy stewardesses.

Bill thanks for your wise inputs but on this one I am holding on to my cash for better times.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 13:42:58

There was a lot of blame on the oil; companies for the high cost of gasoline and heating oil and big corporations in the late 70s. I was old enough to remember that.

Socialism was still very popular in the 70s. All before Reagan. I remember that.

The panic of Three Mile Island and Jane Fonda destroyed the nuclear energy plant plans all over the USA. We would have been far ahead.

Leftism was run amuck.

At least we had a few years before the “moral majority” took over the Republican party.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-19 10:51:03

Crisis? Why should we care?

A good mushroom cloud can ruin the best investment portfolio.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 12:33:10

Given that the stock market always goes up, short selling is a money-losing idea.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by GuillotineRenovator
2015-04-19 11:18:32

A black swan is a surprise event, so if something is seen circling, it’s not a black swan.

 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:07:39

When Wall Street starts worrying about leverage in China’s stock market, you know things are bad.

 
 
Comment by rallying the base
Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 03:33:11

Drudge Report link gonna rally that base

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-marks-army-day-with-cries-of-death-to-israel-us/

P.S. Sheldon Adelson is worth $36,000,000,000

Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 06:36:03

Sheldon Adelson is only worth 29 billion. Michael Bloomberg is worth 35 billion and he wants your guns.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:40:39

Maybe he should’ve put some of the tens of millions he’s spent pushing gun control into buying redundant backups and fail-safes for his Bloomberg terminals.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 07:03:12

Think about how crazy that is. Tens of millions for gun control. A HUGE amount to any normal ant. But a million dollars is much less than 1,000th of what this guy is worth.

If you were a millionaire, this would be the same as donating $1000 to your favorite cause.

All you silly little ants.

 
 
 
 
Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 03:40:40

World Net Daily gon rally some base yo

http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/04/reports-from-israel-reveal-startling-rerun-of-history

“startling rerun of history”

Is that what they call Iraq War III now, LOLZ

 
Comment by Dmsn
2015-04-19 04:55:06

For a guy who spent most of his medical career making sure he got paid by Medicare, Rand Paul sure doesn’t like other people getting government benefits.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-19 07:17:41

It’s only government cheese when OTHER people get it.

Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 08:07:45

Ayn Rand collected social security, and later admitted to using an Obamaphone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 08:58:51

Ayn Rand PAID INTO social security. She was getting out what was hers. Nothing hypocritical about that. I will be lining up to collect social security in eleven years too.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-19 11:11:25

I thought SS was an “entitlement”, as so many “conservatives” here love to point out. You make it sound like it’s an annuity managed by Fidelity or Vanguard.

Don’t get me wrong, I do believe that since we are forced to pay into SS that we all (Ms. Rand included) have a moral right to a retirement benefit.

But the point that others make is that people like Ayn Rand opposed programs like SS and Medicare, calling them socialist entitlement programs. That is until they got old and suddenly realized they weren’t rich enough to retire or pay their medical bills (especially if you smoked like Ms. Rand did); and that was when their principles flew out the window.

Ms. Rand celebrated “greed”, but when she encountered the greed of the medical industrial complex suddenly statist collectivism ceased to be repugnant to her.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 13:48:29

I never heard Ronald Reagan wanting to destroy social security. He wanted to fix it by privatising it. Meanwhile you have to name the names of Republicans who want to keep all that we paid in and never let us get it out. [In fact Reagan praised FDR. The Republicans after Reagan are RINO statists. They are totally disconnected with the Reagan Republicans such as Stockman and Paul Craig Roberts].

 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 05:48:19

Rand Paul endorsed the corporate statist Mitt Romney. He talks the talk, but unlike his old man, he’ll cave on principle to get elected.

Comment by GuillotineRenovator
2015-04-19 11:19:52

He’s a phony. I’ll never vote for that weasel.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 05:57:13

rallying the base ??

After Citizens United won their Supreme decision It does not matter anymore…Undisclosed contributions through Billionaire’s and Multi-National Corporations now have full control of the show and will pick the candidate of their choosing and it won’t be Paul…

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:00:03

Yep. HillaryJeb pretty much have a lock on the corporate statist puppet show.

Comment by GuillotineRenovator
2015-04-19 11:41:03

If made to vote for one, it’d be Hillary hands down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 05:51:35

If we had an intelligent electorate, a candidate like Hillary would have been sent oozing back to Arkansas two decades ago. But when 95% of voters are stupid, this Queen of Crony Capitalism has a real shot at the White House.

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/04/17/more-hillary-cronyism-revealed-how-cisco-used-clinton-foundation-donations-to-cover-up-human-rights-abuse-in-china/

Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 05:59:51

But when 95% of voters are stupid ??

Kind of a stupid statement…

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:09:03

Stupid is as stupid does. Voting for a community organizer pitching snake oil about “hope ‘n change” but who is the de facto third Bush administration who gave us the socialized medicine and insurance company enrichment scheme called Obamacare is stupid.

Voting for a corporate raider (Romney, for the benefit of the ignorant) who was going to give Wall Street an even freer hand to engage in crony capitalism and unfettered rip-offs of the 99% is stupid.

Voting for a lunatic like John McCain who never met a neo-con war he didn’t cream over is stupid.

Voting for corrupt plutocrats like HillaryJeb who are going to take crony capitalism and neo-con adventurism to a whole new level is stupid. If you’re a member of the 99%, that is. If you’re a member of the .1%, its a vote for an insider that will faciliate your looting of the productive economy and profiteering from endless wars.

And the sheep say, “Baaaaa! Baaaaaa!”

Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 06:31:21

I will tell you what I think is stupid when it comes to voting…

What may be the hottest single issue and talking point in the country right now ?? Its wages & income inequality…And we are going to hear about it and hear proposals to address the issue for another 19 months…

So, just two days ago what do the STUPID republicans do in the House…They pass H.R. 1105…The “Death Tax Repeal Act”…They just feel that it is incredibly unfair that only estates worth up to $10,400,000. are exempt from any inheritance tax..

NOOOOO….They want all those mega rich to be able to pay no inheritance tax either…I mean, whats Sheldon Adleson to do if his heirs must pay inheritance tax…Think of his children….How will they get by…

That my friend is what I would call a “stupid” vote….That house bill is going to get hung around Jeb’s neck….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:45:31

I would fully agree that the Republicans, formerly the party of small businesses, producers, and the middle class, have been completely usurped by the mega-corporations, Wall Street, and the .1%, with oligarchs like certain casino magnates effectively buying out the party and using it as a vehicle to push their own neo-con and .1% enrichment agendas. The GOP is a grotesque parody of what it used to be, but the sheeple still pull the lever for the “Republican” candidate because he or she is supposedly the lesser evil. Not so much. And voting for the lesser evil is still voting for evil. I decline.

 
Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 06:59:22

Being on either side of the current partisan politics is stupid. We all may lean conservative or liberal but if you can’t see that there is no point in either one at this point you are more blind than Homer.

And if you can’t criticize your own side you are a hack. Cmon let me hear some people leaning one way or the other criticizing their own sides today.

Here I’ll go first. I lean conservative. Mitt Romney is a Richie Rich oligarch country club republican. I hate country club republicans because they are hypocrites who care only for their bread being buttered first. Jeb is worse because he is all this plus part of a dynasty.

I expect very little

 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:02:38

The GOP is a grotesque parody of what it used to be ??

+1…

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:05:14

In that regard, it is indistinguishable from the Democrats, who are equally corrupt and sold out to corporate interests.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:13:37

Being on either side of the current partisan politics is stupid. We all may lean conservative or liberal but if you can’t see that there is no point in either one at this point you are more blind than Homer.

Well said, Oliver. Both parties suck, and the partisan political hacks who swallow the red/blue pill are too stupid and biased to be picking this nation’s leadership. Yet they do, with visible results in our continuing national decline.

George Carlin nailed it: It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:20:46

Classic Carlin: “Why I don’t vote.” (”If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you’re going to get selfish, ignorant leaders”) or why stupid people, ie. the Obama Zombies, McCain Mutants, and Romney Retards, should refrain from participating in the electoral process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk&spfreload=10

 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:22:11

At least the Dems let the little guy wet his beak a little bit by giving him health care and a few bucks a month when he retires. The Repubs don’t even want that, and the peasants who worry about Sharia law and “religious freedom” are so easily fooled.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:39:38

Here I’ll go first. I lean conservative ??

As do I…I was a registered republican for 30 years that is until the 2000 presidential election when I re-registered Independent…I smelled that Rat Bush a mile away and I was spot-on…

I am to the right on many issues….To the left on others…I despise the abuse of the FSA…No free anything…You got to help pull the wagon not just ride in it…

Stay out of my bedroom and my daughters baby delivery system..

I despise the size of the Military Industrial complex, the loss of much of our freedoms, the disgusting use of federal & State laws that make everyone a criminal…

I will stop there as to not take up to much band width…

 
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 08:48:21

At least the Dems let the little guy wet his beak a little

You mean they do a better job of buying votes?

 
Comment by oxide
2015-04-19 11:09:30

Raymond, do you have ANY other schtick than hating on the current politicians? Do you have ANY candidates you would support? Name one. It doesn’t have to be a household name; it can be a local politician; we can look ‘em up.

the party of small businesses, producers, and the middle class,

Sounds like … Elizabeth Warren?

 
Comment by GuillotineRenovator
2015-04-19 11:57:31

If you’re not willing to whore yourself out to special interests, you will never be a politician. The special interests control who becomes a candidate. Until this process is changed, get used to the status quo.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 11:59:37

I’d support James Webb, and (reluctantly) Rand Paul at the national level.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2015-04-19 15:48:34

Here Here

I will support James Web, Rand Paul, Elizabeth warren over Hillary or Jeb

 
Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 18:31:24

So there you go. I criticized Jeb and Mitt by name, said both are worthless. No one criticized any Dems by name. I’m still waiting. Cmon some dyed in the wool Lib can call Hillary worthless.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-04-19 07:43:42

Stupid is as stupid does. Voting for a community organizer pitching snake oil about “hope ‘n change” but who is the de facto third Bush administration who gave us the socialized medicine and insurance company enrichment scheme called Obamacare is stupid.

Obsession with the terms “community organizer” and “socialized medicine” doesn’t really indicate a good understanding what’s important in politics or health care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 06:58:11

I am not as superior as you, who sits around all day blogging and does nothing about the situation. At this time I have decided to support Hillary Clinton. And I have made this decision as an informed voter who has been involved in the processes for the last 15 years.

We have a democracy in the apathy stage. It is corrupted and dysfunctional. Our POTUS is serving those who are exploiting the apathy, including Soros who makes no bones about being out to destroy the dollar. You need to review how he crashed the British pound in 1992 and destroyed the retirement savings of working class Brits.

It was Soros who made the decision to install Obama instead of Clinton as the Democratic Candidate in 2008. He is the main source of the dark money that has funded his campaigns. Obama will continue to double down on his policies throughout the end of his term and cross Clinton out of the running. As an example I will tell you that Valerie Jarret was the one who red flagged Clintons private server. That server was not for hiding things from the public, she was trying to maintain her privacy from Obama.

As part of the working middle class, I am voting for Clinton as my best bet. So you can mark me here. I say her platform matches my values 80% and that I think she is willing and able to deliver on about 40% of that. So I may get around 30% of my interests promoted.

With all the other candidates I see less than ZERO.

If the Repubs come up with a reformer, I may change my mind. But I do not think they have one that packs the gear to be POTUS.

If she is not what I expect, I will actively campaign for whoever is running against her in 2020.

Unless it is Soros.

Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 07:13:21

Hillary is the solution to the corruption. Hah!

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 07:53:33

She is not running as a reformer. Right now, we need to stop the destruction of the middle class and protect the dollar as the world currency. As part of this, she will need to reign in Wallstreet, but a war with them is counterproductive. Hillary does math.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:05:02

She is not running as a reformer.

No kidding. She’s part of the corrupt status quo.

Right now, we need to stop the destruction of the middle class and protect the dollar as the world currency.

Yes, that’s why Hillary has been at the forefront of the fight to audit the Fed and hold it accountable for its deranged money-printing and racketeering with Wall Street, while transferring the latter’s gambling debts onto taxpayers. Oh, wait…she voted to bail out Wall Street and hasn’t lifted a finger to rein in the Fed.

As part of this, she will need to reign in Wallstreet, but a war with them is counterproductive. Hillary does math.

Clearly logic and history aren’t your strong points. Riddle me this, sheep-girl: what is the basis for your deluded belief that Hillary is going to “reign [sic] in Wallstreet [sic] when her donors looks like a who’s who list of Wall Street grifters?

Hillary does math all right, and she’s calculating how many more tens of millions her personal fortune will increase by (from its current $300 million) if she gets into office and gives her Wall Street patrons free rein to engage in unfettered fraud and swindles of the American people and US taxpayers.

Cretin….

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 08:23:53

Arm Chair Hessel, your name calling and opinions are all you got. I have been and seen for myself. I have stated my expectations of the candidate and what I will do if she does not meet them.

Time will tell who is the fool.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:31:07

The Candidate doesn’t give a rat’s ass about your deluded expectations, nor do I. I’ve destroyed your feeble-minded arguments: now trot on back to your pasture and continue your grazing, sheep.

 
Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 08:34:52

Florida Skeptic, you are a newcomer, yeah? Last few months? You come a across as a DNC shill.

I will vote for whoever will get the Wall St. Vampire Squid off my face. I am a single-issue voter.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 08:37:54

“You come a across as a DNC shill.”

Paid to look like one of the guys / gals…

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:40:06

+1000

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:49:01

I took an interest in this board because I am having a bad time trying to deal with the housing market. You guys are the ones who brought up the politics. I never pretended to be anything but who I am and have been open about my support for Clinton. You also do have trolls here who are snarking her every chance they get. And they may have been here from some time, ingratiating themselves.

So who is who?

 
Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 10:16:29

Most of the trolls are simply long-timers who’ve become bored with the bubble. Think of it this way: you just walked into a neighborhood bar where everyone knows each other. Some of us have been here since 2005/6. It’s been a long time. I’m not saying anyone owns ideas here, simply that we’re are a little irritable with the bubble regardless of the political leanings.

Here is a guide for you:
- Me and Prof are dems
- 2ban is a mentally ill Repub water-carrier
- Everyone else is a pot-smoking libertarian/single white male that occasionally writes code.
- Rio (according to majority) is some sort of flamer of undetermined origin.

LMFAO

 
Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 10:19:43

I would add (seriously) that probably the one thing most of us agree on, regardless of politics, is that fed meddling and corruption of many entities is keeping house prices artificially high by design, and that this is a bad thing.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:42:15

- Everyone else is a pot-smoking libertarian/single white male that occasionally writes code.

Not quite. Some of us are socially and politically conservative, but want nothing to do with the “religious right” and it’s Elmer Gantry moralizing or intrusion into the private sphere of individuals, or the military adventurism of the neo-cons. We share considerable common ground with genuine “progressives” and libertarians on issues like civil liberties, the prison-industrial complex, and opposition to Wall Street’s crony capitalism. I rarely drink, don’t smoke, and don’t do drugs of any sort. I love this country in an old-fashioned way, despite its faults, and am striving for honest, competent, accountable governance within Constitutional limits. I grieve for my kids and the mess they will inherit from feckless older generations, especially the Boomers. I have a low tolerance for people who are willfully ignorant and who’s stupidity has direct adverse consequences on me and the country (as you may have noticed). I marvel at the dim-wittedness of the vast majority of voters who fail to make the connection between their vote for crony capitalism’s water carriers, and the continued economic decline of the 99% and malinvestment in speculative asset bubbles.

We are a diverse group in here, but the overriding tendency is toward free-thinking - so sheep who show up bleating the praises of corrupt and discredited political charlatans may not get a warm reception.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2015-04-19 10:43:18

Muggy you forgot about us and I reluctantly will fill in.

Bill and SUGuy are highly educated single rich alpha males that have women coming after them with mattresses on their backs.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2015-04-19 10:50:32

She is not running as a reformer.

Hillary will tell you what you want to hear. If you are for something she is for that thing and if you are against something she will be against that something. Bill and Hillary are known pander bears. Being for middle class while getting her money from her bosses on Wall Street guess who will win and it isn’t you.

 
Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 11:09:11

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The guide I posted was a starter. Feel free to add!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-20 01:33:25

Independent, not a Democrat. And the chance that I will vote for Hillary is limited to the case where the Retardican party fields an even more frightening candidate. (Unfortuntely this is not a highly unlikely prospect.)

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:22:52

At this time I have decided to support Hillary Clinton. And I have made this decision as an informed voter who has been involved in the processes for the last 15 years.

And another sheep self-identifies as being a moron.

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 07:47:47

Arm Chair Quarterback

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:27:40

Florida Dupe, here are Hillary’s “non-working-middle class” bankrollers who have profited handsomely from their investment in a crony capitalist. I won’t even get into the donors to the Clinton Foundation and how shady they are.

https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&cid=n00000019

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 07:46:29

Arm Chair Hessel, I hope she gets a whole lot of money from them. And I hope the Clinton Foundation does, too. I have stated my expectations of her and that does include cutting Wallstreet pork.

Yup. Lots of money. And they better start paying now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:49:50

I have stated my expectations of her and that does include cutting Wallstreet pork.

Do you live in some sort of group home? Wall Street OWNS Hillary.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 08:02:13

Really? Says you who sits around all day, b!*$&#ing about all the lousy candidates for office. And your solution to this is…

Don’t Vote?????

Well aren’t you a F’n genius.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:09:26

You have unwittingly served as a very instructive object lesson for why stupid people shouldn’t participate in the electoral process.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 08:25:09

I thought your position was that intelligent people (like you) do not participate in the electoral process.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:33:17

We don’t because we’re hopelessly outnumbered by cretins like you, and because “none of the above” is the only way we could vote given the “choices” offered up by the Republicrat duopoly.

 
Comment by Shrimpsaladsandwich
2015-04-19 08:53:06

I thought only I was allowed to call shills as shills. Bought and paid for Florida dyspeptic.

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 09:04:34

Even if you vote, the unelected bureaucrats you cannot vote out cause far more damage than the elected politicians.

Voting is useless. I am on strike.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:11:10

Hello Shrimpsaladsandwhich! How is that other guy you blog as? What’s his name, Ogner or something? You still have no content.

Yea, all you geniuses who figure that not voting is the answer need to realize that you really just do not have the b!tching rights.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 09:53:32

t was Soros who made the decision to install Obama instead of Clinton as the Democratic Candidate in 2008. He is the main source of the dark money that has funded his campaigns.

Looks like Florida Septic doesn’t like being called out on her stupidity, the glaring flaws in what passes for her logic, OR her hypocrisy. Soros is an evil financier when he’s bankrolling Obama, but he suddenly becomes altrusitic when he’s bankrolling Hillary.

Hey Florida Septic: Maybe you have it wrong. Maybe the mega-speculator George Soros is an evil bastard who is usurping our democracy with his candidates-for-hire. Maybe he sees a kindred spirit and accomplice in your so-faux “middle class champion” Hillary.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 10:36:32

You are not paying attention. My position on the candidate is that I would have 30% of my interests represented. I do say that Soros is a player in the game. It is simply that his influence over Clinton is way smaller than it is over Obama. Obama was the selected candidate because Soros and the leftists elites could and do have virtually complete control over him. He is nothing but an empty suit puppet.

Now their dysfunctional ideologies are failing so they have to give Hillary her chance. I like her because they do not. And I am telling you that they are a particularly ugly bunch of totalitarian creeps, like something out of old Soviet Russia, way worse than most people know. For all their goofy fiscal irresponsibility, the Democrats used to be the good guys. That is not true right now. I want my party back. I want my country back. Hillary is as good as it get’s right now.

And before you call anyone a shill or a troll you better look at how many negative posts you putting up about a political candidate on a board about the housing market.

 
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 10:52:20

He is nothing but an empty suit puppet.

We resent that.

–Sad Pandas

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:58:06

If you truly believe that participating in Wall Street’s Republicrat puppet show is going to get you your country or party back, you’re even more delusional than I thought.

There is a very direct connection between the corporate takeover of our political process, and its corruption by moneybags like Soros, Adelson, and the Koch Brothers, and the destruction of the productive economy where real people, i.e. the 99%, have to earn their living. Central bankers have pumped $13 trillion in printing-press liquidity to their .1% accomplices, which has run up stock markets and reinflated the housing bubble, but is fundamentally dangerous and unsustainable. The ZIRP policy pushed by the Fed, together with its reckless Keynesian experiments and out-of-control money printing, constitute theft in the purchasing power and public indeptedness of the 99% while enriching the well-connected .1% in the financial and corporate sectors. Voting for more of the same, i.e. Hillary, is NOT going to get us out of this mess. But I’ll let you figure that out on your own. In the meantime, I’m priced out of the housing market because I refuse to pay these bubble prices, especially when the financial reckoning day is nearer at hand than it has been since 2008.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 12:35:28

And before you call anyone a shill or a troll you better look at how many negative posts you putting up about a political candidate on a board about the housing market.

Whatever became of the folksy “I’m just an ordinary guy/gal” tone? That went out the window in a hurry once we called you out!

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 15:36:27

“Voting is useless. I am on strike.”

BINGO

 
Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 18:37:53

Thanks H.A.!

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 18:58:18

I second that emotion.

 
Comment by GuillotineRenovator
2015-04-19 22:26:43

“Voting is useless. I am on strike.”

Add me to the list.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:48:01

Hey Florida Dupe, I thought Soros was the antithesis of Hillary, the self-proclaimed Champion of the Middle Class. Maybe you should try a basic Google search before you spout off about how the evil George Soros derailed Hillary in ‘08 (but is backing her in 2016).

Did Soros somehow become good, or did Hillary become evil? You tell me….baaaa! Baaaa!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/24/george-soros-hillary-clinton_n_4157242.html

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 08:12:08

Arm Chair Hessel, that is why you need to involve yourself in the process. So you can tell what is really going on. Soros has major financial influence over the Democratic Party and of the major network news stations where you are getting your information.

He needs to contribute a lot to Hillary’s campaign, too. Yes, they all need to pay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:34:56

So Soros ceases to be evil and manipulative when he’s bankrolling “your” candidate. Got it. Following your convoluted “logic” requires some mental gymnastics.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:14:18

The issue is rationality. It is not who serves the candidate, it is who the candidate serves.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 09:59:57

Rationality is clearly not your strong point. Hillary has a long and unsavory history of serving the highest bidder. Explain to me again how her and Bill amassed a fortune of $300 million after leaving “public service” where they presided over such mega-scams on the public as ending Glass-Steagal and letting the banksters run wild with their speculative orgies, directly setting the stage for the 2008 financial crisis.

The issue is rationality, all right. Stupid, ignorant, uninformed, irrational, morally bankrupt people shouldn’t vote.

The prosecution rests….

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 10:45:37

$300 million. I think you need to provide the evidence before you rest your case or I am going to laugh you out of court.

Arguing with you is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board and then struts around like it won the game.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 12:38:29

Can anyone recall Florida Skeptic posting before Hillary’s announcement? The timing of her arrival seems conspicuous.

 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 14:07:42

Professor Bear, why don’t you take it up with the board moderator? It seem you guys can post whatever trash you want to, but cannot handle a challenge.

I have been reading more than posting until I saw all the Hillary garbage. So you may notice some more postings since then. And I saw the anti-feminist junk, I think I am going to go there and point out some more of the hypocrisy.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 16:57:06

You go, girl!

 
Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 18:06:38

“anti-feminist junk”

Every day, another young man Googles “the red pill” or “MGTOW”

There’s no turning back from this, marriage and monogamy are OVER

Enjoy the lonely decades of cats and boxed wine and SSRI antidepressant drugs, ladies, and be sure to to thank a feminist for it, you’ve come a long way baby, and you’re gonna die alone

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 19:00:11

What’s wrong with cats and boxed wine?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 19:05:13

You misspelled “boxed whine.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 22:59:17

It seem you guys can post whatever trash you want to, but cannot handle a challenge.

Sorry to say, but your moronic pro-Hitlary posts don’t rise to the bar of any kind of challenge.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 05:58:55

Another Kristol-backed, AIPAC/neo-con stooge and Wall Street bitch-boy in the race…great. Would be nice to have candidates that put AMERICA’s national interests and the public good above those of a corrupt and venal .1% or our “closest ally” that has no qualms about draining us of blood and treasure to fight its battles.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-18/did-presidential-candidate-marco-rubio-make-deal-devil

 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 06:13:42

Will central bank policies even be an issue in the next election? The institution most responsible for subsidizing the financial industry somehow always manages to operate unnoticed and unchecked by the media and politicians.

Comment by azdude
2015-04-19 06:39:32

why did uncle fed let stocks crash in 2008-2009 ?

Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:01:29

That error was quickly fixed.

 
Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 07:12:05

At the time they didn’t know how easy it would be to print money and not take any political hit for it. After they passed multiple bailouts and enacted multiple QEs they now know they can do whatever they want.

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-04-19 06:18:51

‘China’s central bank on Sunday cut the amount of cash that banks must hold as reserves, the second industry-wide cut in two months, adding more liquidity to the world’s second-biggest economy to help spur bank lending and combat slowing growth. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) lowered the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for all banks by 100 basis points to 18.5 percent, effective from April 20, the central bank said.’

‘The latest cut, the deepest single reduction since the depth of the global crisis in 2008, shows how the central bank is stepping up efforts to ward off a sharp slowdown in the economy. “The size of the cut is more than expected,” said Shenwan Hongyuan Securities analyst Chen Kang. “It’s going to release around a trillion yuan (in liquidity) at least.”

‘The last RRR cut was seen as more defensive by some economists, as it served primarily to offset increasing capital outflows that were exerting a drain on the money supply, making it difficult to guide real lending rates down.’

‘Indeed, Chinese bankers have proven resistant to extending more credit, saying they are also under orders to maintain profitability and reduce the amount of bad loans on their books, but their intransigence appears to have frustrated Beijing. Premier Li Keqiang publicly exhorted banks to lend more to the real economy during a visit to major banks on Friday.’

‘On the corporate side, executives say they are wary of embarking on fresh investments, given weak demand and weakening producer pricing power.’

The quicksand of deflation; fighting it just sinks you further.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:31:36

Deferring the financial reckoning day just like all other central bankers and policymakers. But what day can’t and won’t be held off foreover, and when it comes, it’s going to be cataclysmic.

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 08:40:01

Folk wisdom suggests that deferring the day of reckoning results in a worse reckoning when the day eventually comes.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 06:39:38

The latest cut, the deepest single reduction since the depth of the global crisis in 2008, shows how the central bank is stepping up efforts to ward off a sharp slowdown in the economy ??

Paging Adan……

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 06:46:45

Just shows how many tools China has to maintain 7% growth, which is one of my main contentions all along. They still have 18.5% reserves, what is the rate in the U.S.?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 06:54:47
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:55:08

AB Dan, if China had a total economic collapse and people were resorting to cannibalism to survive, you would argue that their increased protein intake is an indicator of growing prosperity.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:22:59

Soylent Green is Obama’s next AGW policy.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:06:04

If they are doing so well why do they need to goose it Adan ?? Whats wrong with 7%…Just let her run…I think the message is that they are quite concerned…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:17:22

The U.S. is fighting to get growth above 2% and is failing, this quarter’s GDP will show it. China is fighting to keep growth around 7% and is succeeding.

 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:25:13

Crickets…

 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:30:56

People who look at the real economy and not ChinaDaily say that China’s economy may actually be shrinking, especially now that real estate prices are starting to go seriously vertical.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:32:24

Whats wrong with 7%…Just let her run

It is a vestige of the planned economy. Right now based on purchasing power China is the world’s largest economy. However, they want to be the world’s largest economy, period. To do that between now and 2020, they need to grow at least 6.8% a year. I think that is a tall order and they would be better to let the economy grow slightly slower. Nevertheless, they intend to try and they certainly have the tools to maintain around 7% growth this year and they will maintain it.

 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:40:35

Ghost cities and silent factories.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:52:15

Really, those factories now dominate the world, while America lives on home equity loans

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:53:44
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:56:22

And restive ant tribes living in underground tunnels and air raid shelters.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 08:04:59

A lot of room to cut the reserve ratio compared to the U.S:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_requirement

BTW, since Chinese workers are getting raises next to 10% per year and their standard of living is soaring, they are not restive. Even those air raid shelters are a vast improvement to the huts they were living in 40 years ago, everything is relative.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 08:14:17

CIA data shows if anything China is understating its growth and it shows China as the world’s largest economy but don’t let facts get in the way of a “good” opinion:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 08:20:02

Excerpt from CIA world book:

$10.36 trillion

note: because China’s exchange rate is determine by fiat, rather than by market forces, the official exchange rate measure of GDP is not an accurate measure of China’s output; GDP at the official exchange rate substantially understates the actual level of China’s output vis-a-vis the rest of the world; in China’s situation, GDP at purchasing power parity provides the best measure for comparing output across countries (2014 est.)

GDP - real growth rate:

7.4% (2014 est.)

7.7% (2013 est.)

7.7% (2012 est.)

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 08:25:11

Cia excerpt:

The restructuring of the economy and resulting efficiency gains have contributed to a more than tenfold increase in GDP since 1978. Measured on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis that adjusts for price differences, China in 2014 stood as the largest economy in the world, surpassing the US that year� Still, per capita income is below the world average.

 
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 10:33:30

I don’t understand the china hatred from people who basically want to do the same thing by building ghost cities and empty factories in this country.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 06:49:42

And all the individuals that use to invest in high yield trusts are now putting that money into the stock market. Who will keep China’s zombie companies going through the next interest only loan payment? When will defaults start cascading through economy?

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 06:51:06

Excerpt from China Daily:

ROME - The Bank of China’s chief economist Cao Yuanzheng feels China’s efforts to promote the renminbi (RMB) as an international currency is blazing a new trail in world history.

“I think this is an unprecedented process in economic history,” Cao said in an exclusive interview with Xinhua on the sidelines of the “RMB: Going Global. The Bank of China Renminbi Internationalization Forum”.

Renminbi development may be unprecedented but carefully mapped out nevertheless. In his remarks during the forum, Cao said the process has its roots back in the 1990s, and the veteran economist said he still believed it would take several more years for the level of international convertibility of the currency.

“I now think we can speak in terms of years and not decades,” Cao said. “I cannot predict the time table, but I think we’ll get there before 2020.”

Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:14:44

By 2020 China’s currency will be sold next to the Charmin in the supermarket aisle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 07:25:31

Dman your confusing the Yuan which will soon be gold backed with Obama dollars, which will have a big picture of Obama and will be used to wipe your butt.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:15:05

Excerpt from China Daily ??

LOL….China Daily is Gospel but Bloomberg is all lies…LOL…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 10:34:47

They are probably equal in propaganda they carry.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:19:56

When are we going to see a reverse dustbowl migration out of drought-stricken California?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-17/california-plagued-by-dry-wells-as-drought-makes-water-elusive

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 06:49:08

When are we going to see a reverse dustbowl migration out of drought-stricken California ??

Don’t hold your breath…The water problem is easily cured…Don’t let the business that contributes 2% to California’s economy control 80% of the water…If it starts adversely effecting business in the urban centers you watch how fast it gets legislated…

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:56:42

Maybe the Delta Smelt needs to harden the f*** up or be allowed to go extinct. Just sayin’….

Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:08:47

Delta Smelt ??

The Delta Smelt is the Canary…It really is a warning signal about the whole delta eco system…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 06:59:45

There is nothing that California grows that can’t be imported, and if the drought continues, CA can always revert back to its default economy - building plywood McMansions.

Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:12:42

There is nothing that California grows that can’t be imported ??

Most is exported….Would it make sense to allow a business that contributes 2% to the GDP of the economy to use 80% of the electricity ?? 80% of the natural gas ?? Use 80% of the capacity in the sewer treatment plants ??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:37:55

CA may have to give up agriculture, it’s that simple. The whole “problem” would then be solved. The same with Texas cattle farming. Some ways of making food are just not compatible with long term trends in the environment.

 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:43:14

CA may have to give up agriculture, it’s that simple ??

Not really…We grow some of the best fruit in the world…If we just eliminated Alfalfa, Almonds, Dairy & Rice we would be drowning in water and that would also allow us to restore the Delta…

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 08:42:07

CA is definitely full of fruits and nuts.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 08:43:53

“CA may have to give up agriculture, it’s that simple.”

Sure…

 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 07:05:34

You don’t have enough water to go around. Pay up.

 
Comment by Bluto
2015-04-19 10:34:25

A good article giving some historical perspective on the California drought and some ideas on how the state may adapt if it continues.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/14/science/californias-history-of-drought-repeats.html?_r=0

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 08:42:23

Around where I live, we have these amazing inventions called water delivery systems…

Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 15:24:48

All you need now is some water.

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 16:58:20

We have it. It comes out of pipes here, not out of the sky like most other places.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 07:04:49

The more aggressive gender promotes itself. Yea, we need more of that because they have done so well running the world so far.

When men define feminism it is always bad.

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 09:10:51

Meanwhile your candidate Hitlary is responsible for thousands of deaths of children in the Middle East due to her hawkishness. I thought females were supposed anti violence and anti war. Hitlary is a staunch proponent of the police state and world cop role the U.S. government appointed itself in.

Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 09:25:23

Hillarious is not feminist. She’s more like a stepford wive. Any self respecting feminist would have kicked the low life of her husband out of her life long ago. Instead she used his name and fame to enrich herself. Despicable woman.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:04:22

Stepford wives are completely subservient to their husbands. That ain’t Hillary. She was the brains of the Clinton co-Presidency and intellectual author of a lot of the (non-sexual) scandals that have followed them ever since Whitewater. Lady MacBeth would be a more fitting comparison.

 
 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:28:56

Gee, thanks for the judgement, God. But I did not think I would find you blogging on the Housing Bubble. Say, when is the US Stock Market going to crash?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 09:21:42

It’s also bad when a small minority of women define it for the rest of them.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 07:22:02

There is a price being paid as a consequence of woman independence…Young men are saying No Thanks…

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:34:31

There’s been a huge increase in guys marrying foreign brides, because they see them (correctly or not) as a preferable marital alternative to being saddled with a “feminist” who generally make shitty wives, mothers, and life partners.

Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 08:12:23

There’s been a huge increase in guys marrying foreign brides ??

See it all the time around here…Mostly Asian brides…Philippine’s also…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 08:36:35

Yeah…most of them will get their green card, then it’s bye bye hubby and oh I’ll be taking 50% of your assets with me.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-04-19 08:46:30

Gee Ray, doesn’t that contradict your statement above that those foreign women are a preferable marital alternative?

 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 09:09:01

oh I’ll be taking 50% of your assets with me ??

Pre-nup….In return for getting them out of their god forsaken country they will sign it…

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:09:27

Gee Ray, doesn’t that contradict your statement above that those foreign women are a preferable marital alternative?

Try reading for comprehension, Corky. I personally think marrying a mail order bride is a bad idea in most cases. But I know several guys who have done so, and the reason they invariably give (and I have no opinion on the matter one way or another) is that they make better wives than American woman.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-19 10:23:28

Pre-nup….In return for getting them out of their god forsaken country they will sign it…

Pre-nups can be invalidated. Then it’s bye-bye to 50% of your assets.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 15:25:22

Corky…. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 
 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:31:17

That’s because they have not figured out that when a man and woman get married, his life expectancy goes up and hers goes down. It takes good slaves to appreciate that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:10:50

If I was married to you I’d be praying for an early and merciful death.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-04-19 10:36:29

That’s because they have not figured out that when a man and woman get married, his life expectancy goes up and hers goes down.

I did a quick google; the jury seems to be out on this claim.

 
Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 10:40:36

She will never marry you because you are not bill, filner or weiner.

 
 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 14:12:50

Men who have to look to foreign women in third world nations for wives are no better than Corporations who go there for cheap labor. It is the same thing.

They do it so they do not have to meet the standards and wages of Americans.

Pathetic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 14:29:42

Arm Chair Hessel, I am going to remember that you advocated the outsourcing of women for wives while you carry on about the evil corporation outsourcing jobs.

And it is no coincidence that you are all over the board bashing Hillary and also independence for women.

Dare I say it? I think I smell a sexist …. oink.

Somebody call the moderator - she must be a DNC troll!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 15:49:32

No, I said mail order brides were a bad idea in my book. I merely noted the fact that an increasing number of men are marrying foreign women in preference to American women, because they think foreign women especially from Eastern Europe or Asia, make better wives. I don’t “advocate” this practice: what part of “I think it’s a bad idea” don’t you understand?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:39:29

Apparently millenials in the Obama-Fed-Goldman Sachs economy aren’t all that eager to be debt slaves chained to a depreciating “asset.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/affluent-apartment-renters-slow-to-buy-a-home-2015-4

On an almost-daily basis, we hear the question: When will the millennial / first-time buyer emerge? While predicting the behavior of a cohort still recovering from high levels of unemployment and a record amount of student loan debt can be tricky, the response of some of the largest apartment REIT operators is an unhesitating no time soon.

Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 18:32:37

+1

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 06:41:10

If you want to win in poker, don’t show the other players your hand.

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 08:46:07

Unless you don’t care about winning, since you are playing with somebody else’s chips.

Tim Worstall
Contributor
Economics & Finance 4/19/2015 @ 6:32AM 4,451 views
ECB’s Mario Draghi Makes A Dreadful Mistake Over Greece And The Euro

At least this is the way that I am reading this, when Mario Draghi said that the euro is irreversible, a one way street only. Therefore no one should be speculating about Greece leaving the single currency. The reason why that’s such a dreadful mistake to my mind is that it takes away the Great Big Bargaining Cluebat that the Eurogroup has over Greece. I am of course starting from the point that at least some of the expressed desires of at least some of the participants in this Greek debt standoff are in fact true. Perhaps that’s not the way to start given that this is politics but that’s where I indeed am. And what we think we know is that the European Union itself would very much prefer to see the euro continue with Greece in it. So would the ECB and the Eurogroup. So also would the Greek citizenry. And Syriza has at least said that it prefers that too: although there are some members of that party who over the years have differed from that line. So, everyone’s getting what they say they want with Greece staying in. However, I still think this from Draghi is a horrible mistake:

European Central Bank President Mario Draghi on Saturday rejected speculation that Greece may be forced to abandon the euro, reiterating that Europe’s single currency is irrevocable.

At a news conference during meetings here of the world’s top finance officials Mr. Draghi said he stood by a comment he made in August 2012 that the euro “cannot be reversed.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 19:00:22

What are the implications of a Greek default sans Grexit?

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 19:04:13

ft dot com
April 19, 2015 2:04 pm
Greek default necessary but Grexit is not
Wolfgang Munchau Wolfgang Münchau
Defaulting on the IMF and ECB is the only route to short-term relief but nobody has ever done it
A Greek and an EU flag wave in front of the ancient temple of Parthenon atop the Acropolis hill in Athens
©AFP

Until last week, discussions with Greece did not go well. That changed when the circus of international financial diplomacy moved to Washington for the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Then it became worse.

My hunch is that this show will go on for quite a while. The Greeks want to merge the talks on the extension of the current, second, loan programme with the talks on the new third one. For that to work they will require temporary bridging finance to get through the summer. This sounds like somebody has a plan. But this is not my impression. I have never seen European finance officials so much at a loss.

The big question — whether Greece will leave the eurozone or not — remains unanswerable. But I am now fairly certain it will default.

My understanding is that some eurozone officials are at least contemplating the possibility of a Greek default but without Grexit. The complexity is severe, and they may not have had the time to work it out. But it may be the only way to avert utter disaster.

On whom could, or should, Greece default? It could default on its citizens by not paying public-sector wages or pensions. That would be morally repugnant and politically suicidal for the Syriza-led government. In theory, it could default on the two loans it received from its EU partners, though it is not due to start repaying the first of those until 2020, and the second in 2023. It could also default on the remaining private-sector bondholders but that would not be a good idea. Greece might need private sector investors later.

It could also default on the IMF and the European Central Bank. The IMF is expecting a series of repayments. The ECB wants its money back in the next few months on debt it holds on its books. Defaulting on the IMF and ECB is the only option that would bring genuine financial relief in the short term. Nobody has ever done that. It might trigger Grexit.

Then again, it might not. Default is not synonymous with exit. There is no EU ruling that says you have to leave the eurozone when you default on your debt. The link between default and exit is indirect; if a country defaults, its defaulting securities are no longer eligible as IOUs for the country’s banks to tender at ECB money auctions. The same applies to any other debt guaranteed by Athens. The Greek banks hold quite a bit of the latter category, and might find it hard to obtain liquidity if their government falters.

So to default “inside the eurozone” one only needs to devise another way to keep the banking system afloat. If someone could concoct a brilliant answer, there would be no need for Grexit.

The economic case for a debt default is overwhelming. It is hard to see how Greece can ever service its debts as agreed. Even in the creditor countries few people are under illusions about Athens’ long-term debt-servicing capacity. Full servicing would require huge primary surpluses — that is, surpluses before payment of interest on debt. It would leave Greece trapped in a debt depression for a long time. The scheduled primary surplus for 2016 is 4.5 per cent, which is bordering on the insane. Athens absolutely needs to default.

At the same time, there is a strong case for remaining in the eurozone. Grexit would bring incalculable economic risk to the country itself, and would harm the EU’s geopolitical ambitions and its global reputation.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 21:33:16

Signs the market is girding for a Greek default, in 4 charts
By Sara Sjolin
Published: Apr 16, 2015 12:58 p.m. ET
Grexit risk at highest it is ever been — Barclays

If the financial market is a good predictor, you’d better brace for a Greek default.

Borrowing costs on Greece’s government bonds have rallied back to levels not seen since 2012, the cost of insuring against a default has surged and investors are moving into safer assets in the eurozone, such as German bonds and equities.

These factors all indicate that capital markets are getting increasingly concerned the Greek government won’t reach a deal with its lenders in time to avoid a cash crunch. If the country runs out of money it could face a default and eventually be forced to leave the eurozone. Read: S&P cuts Greece credit rating, outlook is ‘negative’

“Overall the probability of a Greek exit is higher now than it ever was,” analysts at Barclays said in a note. “Even if a no-default ‘muddle-through’ remains our baseline forecast for now.”

The concern was echoed at Nomura, where economists said the “loss of trust in Athens among Greece’s eurozone partners has significantly raised the probability of [...] a ‘Greccident’.”

The bank put a 40% probability of a Greek exit and “this is still rising with no clear sign of a reversal”.

There is one thing to bear in mind. A default doesn’t necessarily equal an exit from the eurozone. In 2012, Greece defaulted on some of its debt and went through the biggest debt-restructuring in history, but it didn’t push the country out of the currency union.

In any case, financial markets fear something bad is about to happen to Greece, as illustrated over the next four charts.

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-04-19 06:53:37

‘Ask a Native NYC Real Estate Broker: Are Brokers Parasites?’

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 07:11:17

Funny…. Once the realt-liar gets called out on just what realt-liars are he begins to invokes the word “professional”.

professional. LOLOLOL

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 06:56:24

Hillary could have only been a little girl when this happened.

Abraham Lincoln was assassinated as the Civil War drew to a close

150 years ago this month, the president was shot while attending a play in Washington.

By Marylou Tousignant April 7

Northerners whooped it up when they heard that Confederate General Robert E. Lee had surrendered. The Civil War was all but over! The North had won!

Five days later, President Lincoln and his wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, decided to see a play at Ford’s Theatre, near the White House. The president was tired from the strain of leading the nation through four years of bloodshed. An evening out often lifted his spirits. So on the night of April 14, 1865 — 150 years ago next week — the Lincolns went to the theater.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/…/04/07/9ebbacde-ce5b-11e4-8a46-b1dc9be5a8ff_story.html - Similar pages

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 06:57:54

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-04-19 07:02:19

“An evening out often lifted his spirits.”

And this evening was no different. Mine eyes have seen the gory.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-04-19 07:20:50

Paul Craig Roberts on the Lincoln mythology: The Power of Lies. Scroll down for an interesting read.

“As Professor Thomas DiLorenzo writes: “Lincoln spent his entire political career attempting to use the powers of the state for the benefit of the moneyed corporate elite (the ‘one-percenters’ of his day), first in Illinois, and then in the North in general, through protectionist tariffs, corporate welfare for road, canal, and railroad corporations, and a national bank controlled by politicians like himself to fund it all.”

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/13/power-lies/

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 07:31:39

I believe Ben gave Rio a history lesson on this subject.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 07:40:34

Lola wasn’t the only one who got a history lesson. Spend some time reading and thinking ->

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/13/power-lies/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 12:18:25

“Lincoln did not think blacks were the equals of whites. Lincoln’s plan was to send the blacks in America back to Africa,”

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 12:25:16

“Lincoln did not think blacks were the equals of whites. Lincoln’s plan was to send the blacks in America back to Africa,”

Kinda hard to believe the dude got such a killer monument and his face on both the penny and the five dollar bill.

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-04-19 08:00:00

From Wikipedia, some conservatives lambast one of ths books written by this Thomas DiLorenzo guy:

Writing for The Daily Beast, Rich Lowry described DiLorenzo’s technique in this book as the following: “His scholarship, such as it is, consists of rummaging through the record for anything he can find to damn Lincoln, stripping it of any nuance or context, and piling on pejorative adjectives. In DiLorenzo, the Lincoln-haters have found a champion with the judiciousness and the temperament they deserve.”[21]

Reviewing for The Independent Review, a think tank associated with DiLorenzo, Richard M. Gamble described the book “travesty of historical method and documentation”. He said the book was plagued by a “labyrinth of [historical and grammatical] errors”, and concluded that DiLorenzo has “earned the … ridicule of his critics.”[22] In his review for the Claremont Institute, Ken Masugi writes that “DiLorenzo adopts as his own the fundamental mistake of leftist multi-culturalist historians: confusing the issue of race with the much more fundamental one, which was slavery.” He noted that in Illinois “the anti-slavery forces actually joined with racists to keep their state free of slavery, and also free of blacks.” Masugi called DiLorenzo’s work “shabby” and stated that DiLorenzo’s treatment of Lincoln was “feckless” and that the book is “truly awful”.[23][24] In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Claremont Institute fellow professor Harry V. Jaffa on the merits of Abraham Lincoln’s statesmanship before and during the Civil War.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_DiLorenzo

Comment by palmetto
2015-04-19 08:11:49

Lol, Rich Lowry. Conservatism, Inc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 08:37:42

Stinkin’ Lincoln.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-04-19 08:46:17

Lol, I’m tellin’ ya. Honest Abe, feh. As PCR says, the Pol Pot of the US. Can’t wait until the social justice warrior crowd trashes him for good and it will happen, when the blacks finally realize it was their ancestors and the abolitionists that really did the “freeing”.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-04-19 08:59:15

when the blacks finally realize it was their ancestors and the abolitionists that really did the “freeing”.

How about when blacks read what Lincoln really thought about blacks. Can’t really tell the difference between George Wallace and Abraham Lincoln in that regard.

 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 09:11:29

Yesterday I overheard someone say ‘lawyers are liars’.

thoughts?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-04-19 07:53:51

And my great great grandfather was there to see that Lee’s army never made it past Appomattox.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:02:26

Looks like the GOP 2016 clown car is about to spill out yet another disastrous joke of a candidate.

http://news.yahoo.com/huckabee-president-why-2016-wont-2008-173657693.html

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-04-19 09:14:29

Huckabee is the worst of them all. I don’t see a single republican worth voting for. Rand is no Ron.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:14:43

+1. But he’s the best of a bad bunch. I’m hoping James Webb runs. I’d vote for him over any of the current field.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 11:07:05

Rand Paul, that is. Not Huckabee.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:09:35

A bunch of whiz-kid computer science geeks programming bots to front-run retail investors in the Fed’s rigged and manipulated Ponzi market. What could possibly go wrong?

http://wolfstreet.com/2015/04/18/jared-dillian-how-to-beat-the-bots-algos-on-wall-street/

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 07:13:48

Climate Change Sherry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sJCYeG6be8 - 304k -

 
Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 07:27:13

The technology is there for:

Individual solar power for homes or cars without grids or subsidies.

Male birth control pills.

They will never allow either to see the light of day because they would upset the oligarchs Apple carts. Always just a few years away.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 07:35:31

Dudes are too irresponsible to take birth control pills.

Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 09:57:19

It’s in their interest bigtime, controlling whether they can be stuck with a hookup for the next 18 years. Sure they can. Viagra shows that if something works and is in their interest and available it will be used. And it doesn’t need to be daily, or even weekly.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-19 08:27:57

Individual solar power for homes or cars without grids or subsidies.

LOLZ. Hope you don’t want the lights on at _night_!

Comment by OliverGarchy
2015-04-19 09:58:49

Oh pleez. The tech is easily there to give plenty of power. Whose ox does it gore letting it out though.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-04-20 08:25:33

The tech is easily there to give plenty of power.

News flash, bright eyes: putting batteries in every home would be WAY, WAY more expensive than maintaining the grid tying the homes together.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 07:29:35

Redmond, WA Housing Demand Craters 13% YoY; List Prices Sink 4%

http://www.zillow.com/redmond-wa/home-values/

http://files.zillowstatic.com/research/public/City/City_MedianPctOfPriceReduction_AllHomes.csv

You paid how much for a depreciating asset? And financed too?

Comment by redmondjp
2015-04-20 09:36:53

Dude,

Give it up.

I live in Redmond. Zillow data is junk.

It’s like trying to use Twitter as a news feed.

 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-04-19 08:30:43

he who prints the most wins!

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 08:39:23

He who borrows to grossly inflated prices for depreciating assets losses!

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 09:49:30

“He who borrows to grossly inflated prices for depreciating assets losses!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2yIkDVs0cA - 257k -

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 10:38:52

The young Caine asks Master Kan how many more years he can live in his house for free.

“Quickly as you can, snatch the foreclosure papers from my hand.” The young Caine tries and fails. “When you can take the foreclosure papers from my hand, it will be time for me to leave. -Master Kan

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 09:21:53

More Hillary Cronyism Revealed: Cisco Used Clinton Foundation To Cover-up Human Rights Abuse In China

There’s shameless, and then there’s Hillary Clinton

by Mike Krieger | Liberty Blitzkrieg blog | April 19, 2015

As many suspected, it turns out that the Clinton Foundation is indeed a tepid cesspool of crony corporate and government donations used to buy influence at the highest levels of Washington D.C. This shouldn’t surprise anyone paying attention, but it will hopefully wake up some Democrats still buying into the deep rooted myth of Hillary Clinton.

David Sirota and his colleagues at International Business Times have been relentless in uncovering several extremely important examples of her pathological cronyism. I highlighted his very important work just last week in the post, This is How Hillary Does Business – An Oil Company, Human Rights Abuses in Colombia and the Clinton Foundation. Here’s an excerpt:

The details of these financial dealings remain murky, but this much is clear: After millions of dollars were pledged by the oil company to the Clinton Foundation — supplemented by millions more from Giustra himself — Secretary Clinton abruptly changed her position on the controversial U.S.-Colombia trade pact. Having opposed the deal as a bad one for labor rights back when she was a presidential candidate in 2008, she now promoted it, calling it “strongly in the interests of both Colombia and the United States.” The change of heart by Clinton and other Democratic leaders enabled congressional passage of a Colombia trade deal that experts say delivered big benefits to foreign investors like Giustra.

The details of her family’s entanglements in Colombia echo talk that the Clintons have blurred the lines between their private business and philanthropic interests and those of the nation. And Hillary Clinton’s connections to Pacific Rubiales and Giustra intensify recent questions about whether big donations influenced her decisions as secretary of state.

As it turns out, this was just an appetizer. Despite claiming to be a strong advocate for human rights in China, it turns out she is an even stronger advocate for corporate donations. From the International Business Times:

http://www.infowars.com/…/ - 91k -

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 09:42:01

The change of heart by Clinton and other Democratic leaders enabled congressional passage of a Colombia trade deal that experts say delivered big benefits to foreign investors like Giustra.
————————————————————————–
WTF? Clinton is now running congress? And Info Wars is maintaining her platform on the issues?

You Hillary haters need to keep scrounging for some better swill than that.

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 10:04:34

Death Threats Remain Rampant Under Obama’s Colombia FTA

Lori Wallach

Director, Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch

Posted: 04/16/2013 2:29 pm EDT Updated: 06/16/2013 5:12 am EDT

Shame on the Obama administration: Two years after it announced its “Labor Action Plan” to grease passage of a Bush-negotiated Free Trade Agreement (FTA), death threats against Colombian unionists persist unabated.

Remember then-candidate Obama’s passionate confrontation with McCain during the last presidential debate, explaining why he opposed the U.S.-Colombia FTA: “We have to stand for human rights and we have to make sure that violence isn’t being perpetrated against workers who are just trying to organize for their rights.”

Yet in April 2012, as anti-union repression rose in Colombia, President Obama travelled to Cartagena to announce the implementation of the FTA, declaring: “this agreement is a win for our workers and the environment because of the strong protections it has for both — commitments we are going to fulfill.”

What change in Colombia could possibly have led a Democratic president to implement a trade agreement over the objections of Democrats in Congress with the country infamous around the world for its violence against unionists? The number of death threats against unionists had not abated, and unionist assassinations remained rampant.

The only difference was the Labor Action Plan, touted by the administration but decried by U.S. and Colombian unions and the policymakers in both countries who had long led the fight to end the deadly repression of basic rights in Colombia.

Now, a full two years after the Obama administration announced the Labor Action Plan, Colombia remains the world’s deadliest place to be a union member. Unionists in Colombia received 471 death threats in the year after the Plan was launched — exactly the same yearly number as in the two years before the Plan, according to the Escuela Nacional Sindical, the group recognized in the Plan as an authoritative source of monitoring data. This number is even more shocking when one considers the diminished ranks of unionists in Colombia, where more than 3,000 union members have been assassinated since 1986 and many have fled to exile. Meanwhile, many of the accused in the more than 2,000 unionist murder cases remain free.

If that wasn’t enough, violent mass displacements of Colombians rose 83 percent in 2012, adding to the five million who have been forced from their homes and their land in the world’s largest internal displacement crisis. Since the FTA’s 2011 passage, horrific violence and forced displacement has increased in venues targeted for development under the FTA, such as the port of Buenaventura.

Should these disturbing numbers come as a shock? Unfortunately not. U.S. and Colombian unions and human rights organizations warned the Obama administration that the FTA would exacerbate the forced displacements and other acts of political violence that far too many Colombians face on a daily basis. In the same way that the U.S.-Oman FTA has shielded that country from U.S. economic sanctions as the government has brutalized the country’s “Arab Spring” movement, the Colombia FTA signaled to Colombia’s government and business elite that its interests were secured regardless of human rights abuses.

Among the unionists who have received death threats since the FTA went into effect is Jhonsson Torres, a sugar cane worker who came to Washington to plead with members of Congress not to approve the FTA until labor protections improved. One year ago, as Obama was declaring the FTA ready for implementation, the general secretary of Jhonsson’s union, who had also been a target of death threats, was shot and killed while walking with his wife.

Despite members of Congress, labor unions and human rights groups in Colombia and the United States pointing out to the Obama administration the many deficiencies in the Labor Action Plan and the lunacy of implementing the FTA before any real improvement could be measured, the sad reality is a failed promise to fix the horrifying daily situations of Colombian workers.

Maybe the most infuriating fact in this tragic ordeal is the flip-flop from the trade reform agenda President Obama campaigned on in 2008 to the retrograde trade agreements that the administration is negotiating today, including a massive 11-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership FTA. In formulating this agreement, which includes Vietnam — a country that the U.S. State Department cited last year for child labor and “antiunion discrimination.” The administration is taking no incoming data on the labor rights debacle in Colombia. Nor is it considering how the U.S. trade deficit with Korea has grown 34 percent under implementation of the U.S.-Korea FTA, also passed in 2011.

Doing more of the same while trying to sell the American public on the notion that these next agreements will have different outcomes is more than dishonest.

With all of the talk about Obama’s focus on his legacy, certainly violent repression of human rights and lost American jobs is not the desired narrative. The Obama administration is responsible for ignoring the warning signs and implementing the U.S.-Colombia agreement. Now what will it do to reverse the horrible trend of violence? And will it now stop selling anti-worker FTAs on the basis of empty promises?

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 11:06:32

Sorry Skeptic I forgot your huffingtonpost link.

Death Threats Remain Rampant Under Obama’s Colombia FTA …
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lori-wallach/death-threats-remain-ramp_b_3093907.html - 165k - Cached - Similar pages
Apr 16, 2013

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 15:36:34

Phony, no comment on the post. There are a lot of bad things going on and I have never liked Obama. And I am not advocating Hillary Clinton’s perfection either. My position is simply that she is the best candidate I see around. Mark me, my expectations are 30% for her and less than zero for all the others. My worst nightmare is that the extreme leftist elites of the party will preempt her again with another Obama.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 15:53:21

That’s where we’re different. I refuse on principle to vote for sleazy, corrupt candidates merely because their opposition is even worse. It’s better at that point to withdraw the “consent of the governed” until the political class realizes it has no legitimacy and will be forced to accept reforms.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 10:20:19

You Hillary haters need to keep scrounging for some better swill than that.

It’s amusing, though sad, to see the lengths you’ll go to to keep your blinders firmly in place and vote for an evil, corrupt candidate because you’ve convinced yourself - using a tragically limited intellect - that she’s the cat’s meow and will be responsive to your concerns. Confronting you with the facts or logic is useless. If Hillary gets elected I can guarantee you this: in 4 more years the 99% will be immensely worse off, while the .1% will be flourishing more than ever. But you’ll still be stupid and deluded in any event.

Comment by Florida Skeptic
2015-04-19 15:40:02

I suggest you wait and see if it happens before you start calling any names. And that represent 30% of my interests as a working middle class American. Mark me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by TBoom
2015-04-19 10:19:54

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 09:21:53

More Hillary Cronyism Revealed: Cisco Used Clinton Foundation To Cover-up Human Rights Abuse In China
infowars.com/more-hillary-cronyism-revealed-cisco-used-clinton-foundation-to-cover-up-human-rights-abuse-in-china/

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 10:20:30

From the International Business Times:

Cisco Systems had a public relations problem: Having invested $16 billion in the Chinese market, the technology giant was suddenly facing congressional scrutiny over its alleged complicity in building the so-called Great Firewall that helps China’s authoritarian regime censor information and surveil its citizens.

The San Jose, California, company endured a high-profile Senate hearing about its Chinese operations in 2008 and reaffirmed its “continued commitment to China.” But the issue wouldn’t die. A group of investors stormed the company’s annual meeting in November 2009, pressing a shareholder resolution that would force the company to prevent the Chinese government from using Cisco technology to engage in what critics said was widespread human-rights abuse.

That’s when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tossed the company a lifeline. Weeks after Cisco executives killed the shareholder initiative, Cisco was honored as a finalist for the State Department’s award for “outstanding corporate citizenship, innovation and democratic principles.” The next year, the company won the award. While the honors were for the company’s work in the Middle East, they gave Cisco a well-timed opportunity to change the subject and present itself as a champion of human rights.

What Clinton did not say at the State Department award ceremonies was that Cisco had been pumping money into her family’s foundation. Though the foundation will not release an exact timeline of the contributions, records reviewed by International Business Times show that Cisco had by December 2008 donated from $500,000 to $1 million to the foundation. The company had hired lobbying firms run by former Clinton aides. After the money flowed into the foundation, Clinton’s State Department not only lauded Cisco’s human rights record, it also delivered millions of dollars worth of new government contracts to the company.

Internet freedom advocates say Clinton’s moves helped Cisco whitewash its image and also raise questions about the sincerity of her often-stated commitment to human rights.

“Crony capitalism has defined Clinton’s career, from her tenure on the board of Walmart, to the Wall Street execs whom she surrounded herself with at the State Department, to her allegiance to Cisco, even as it violated principles on which she staked her tenure,” said David Segal, executive director of the Internet freedom advocacy group Demand Progress.

But the issue of Chinese repression — and Cisco’s role — was already known by then. In 2009, weeks after Clinton’s State Department had named Cisco a finalist for the secretary of state’s Awards for Corporate Excellence (ACE), a report from the Electronic Freedom Foundation noted “Cisco’s deep involvement” in building the Chinese government’s censorship system. The report pointed out that “Cisco engineers gave a presentation acknowledging the repressive uses for their technology.”

In 2010, the Clinton Foundation gave Cisco CEO John Chambers a high-profile speaking role at its “Turning Ideas Into Action” annual meeting. Cisco also won an ACE that year — just before the Human Rights Law Foundation filed a lawsuit against Cisco outlining what the foundation’s executive director, Terri Marsh, said was the “key role Cisco played in the design, construction, and maintenance of China’s Internet surveillance system.”

In an interview with IBTimes, Marsh said that “Cisco’s conduct has enabled an unprecedented and widespread crackdown on religious minorities, Tibetans, and democracy activists in China.” Cisco’s work in China, she said, “runs contrary to Secretary Clinton’s stated commitment to ‘a single Internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas.’”

She added: “We are disappointed that the State Department has chosen to reward rather than condemn such a company, and believe that the United States should instead be sending a clear message to American technology corporations that complicity in global human rights abuses is not acceptable.”

Daniel Wade, an attorney who represented Chinese dissidents in a lawsuit against Cisco, told IBTimes that “Cisco knew full well that its products were going to be used to suppress and facilitate the torture of democracy activists.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which today works with Cisco on an Internet encryption project, said Cisco technology enabled violent repression by the Chinese government.

“We have ample evidence to indicate that the technology Cisco created was instrumental in the tracking down of religious minorities, detaining them, and murdering them,” said Rainey Reitman, the EFF’s activism director. “Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a full public accounting.”

There’s shameless, and then there’s Hillary Clinton. She is in a league all by herself.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2015-04-19 09:47:48

Heard John Kasich on meet the press this morning discussing the possibility of running…Never mentioned Hilary’s name one time…Refreshing as compared to the rest of the group out there…

Comment by bungabunga
2015-04-19 10:41:41

Stop pretending. You will vote Hillary.

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 09:59:19

crushing.housing.losses.

Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 10:24:27

Where are you operating these days? My friend in Delaware says things are slowing down in the Wilmo area. We met a nice couple from NOVA on spring break, and they said things were nuts.

Clearwater/St. Pete area is insane. We just wrapped up a record-breaking spring season. It’s possible that in any meaningful timeline, I am priced out of Pinellas County.

How’s Allena these days?

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 10:29:32

We renewed our lease through June of 2016 (small increase). Paying 17% of take-home to rent :grin: #EFIL4ZATNER

I completed the first serious step toward relocating and finished certification for the State of Georgia. I’m encouraging my wife to do the same so we can have options next year. My Oil City Plan is Rome, Georgia or possibly Dahlonega or Columbus.

We like things about AZ and CA, but it just seems all-too-crazy to get serious about those states, and with our parents aging, we’d like to remain on the east coast.

The combination of house prices + car and home insurance makes Florida unattractive over the medium-to-long term. In the meantime, I’ll make the most of it and keep getting out on the water.

Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 10:59:48

“We renewed our lease through June of 2016 (small increase). Paying 17% of take-home to rent”

Good for you.

When did house prices hit their false floor over there? I figure is was about 2010 - 2011 over here which in some cases had them around prices in 2000. They have been pushed back up to about a 2004 equivalent now.

Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 11:44:41

“When did house prices hit their false floor over there? I figure is was about 2010 - 2011 over here which in some cases had them around prices in 2000. They have been pushed back up to about a 2004 equivalent now.”

You nailed the floor: absolutely 2010ish. Remember the $8k first-time homebuyer credit? And yes, we’re at about 2004 levels. The house I rent Zillows at a ridiculous level. I hope the property manager keeps the owners expectations in line.

Somedays it doesn’t bother me at all, and then some days it drives me insane. Prior to the bubble, the only “real estate is crazy” exposure I had was NYC… it’s an understatement to say that I am disappointed that we are all in the NYC game now, regardless of geography.

Comment by Muggy
2015-04-19 11:47:49

If prices hit 2006/7 levels again, and bubble 2.0 takes 5+ years to deflate, I might actually have a heart attack. I can’t keep pulling against extortionist prices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 12:13:25

“Remember the $8k first-time homebuyer credit?”

There is so much to remember I forgot about that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 18:39:40

+ 1

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 11:14:53

Uh oh. Futures markets open in a few hours, and Greece’s leaders still aren’t playing ball.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-19/greece-remains-defiant-as-creditors-step-up-pressure-for-a-deal

Comment by azdude
2015-04-19 11:36:10

Is it time for a deflationary cycle so wall street can scoop up some more cheap assets?

There is a feeling out there that the bottom could fall out at any time now.Makes you feel real confident buying risk assets doesn’t it?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 12:40:35

No worries now, as Draghi has signaled that Greece gets to stay in the Eurozone no matter what happens…

 
 
Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 11:43:45

housing crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrime.

Comment by azdude
2015-04-19 12:37:38

how many years have you been on unemployment rolls?

I know you would buy a house if you could get a loan.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-04-19 13:27:25

housing frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrraud.

Santa Rosa, CA Prices Dive 4% YoY; Inventory Balloons 124%

http://www.movoto.com/santa-rosa-ca/market-trends/

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 12:47:46

Jon Stewart breaks down the Middle East imbroglio.

http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/xu0tha/constant-intractable-madness

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 16:04:39

If you like your crony capitalism, you can keep your crony capitalism (Bernanke joins a hedge fund).

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102597147

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 16:26:39

Cisco Kid was a friend of mine

War - Cisco Kid - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu_YVswb3p4 - 291k -

From the International Business Times:

Cisco Systems had a public relations problem: Having invested $16 billion in the Chinese market, the technology giant was suddenly facing congressional scrutiny over its alleged complicity in building the so-called Great Firewall that helps China’s authoritarian regime censor information and surveil its citizens.

That’s when then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tossed the company a lifeline. Weeks after Cisco executives killed the shareholder initiative, Cisco was honored as a finalist for the State Department’s award for “outstanding corporate citizenship, innovation and democratic principles.”

What Clinton did not say at the State Department award ceremonies was that Cisco had been pumping money into her family’s foundation. Though the foundation will not release an exact timeline of the contributions, records reviewed by International Business Times show that Cisco had by December 2008 donated from $500,000 to $1 million to the foundation.

infowars.com/more-hillary-cronyism-revealed-cisco-used-clinton-foundation-to-cover-up-human-rights-abuse-in-china/

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 17:03:49

Bloomberg: drought out west starting to affect the housing market. Horrors! Who knew asset bubbles were subject to the laws of nature?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-16/the-drought-s-latest-victim-out-west-is-the-housing-market

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 17:28:08

ft dot com
Global Economy Lex Comment Management Life & Arts
Last updated: April 19, 2015 5:40 pm
Dollar’s rise casts shadow on US earnings
By Nicole Bullock in New York and Eric Platt and Roger Blitz in London
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: Newly redesigned $100 notes lay in stacks at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing on May 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. The one hundred dollar bills will be released this fall and has new security features, such as a duplicating portrait of Benjamin Franklin and microprinting added to make the bill more difficult to counterfeit. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
©Getty

A surging dollar is expected to hit some of the largest US multinationals this week, as more than a fifth of S&P 500 companies report results for a quarter marked by a 9 per cent jump in their domestic currency.

Blue-chip behemoths such as IBM, General Motors, United Technologies, Coca-Cola and McDonald’s are among those set to release earnings by Friday.

With the S&P up only 1.1 per cent this year, investors are concerned that several companies could emulate General Electric and Philip Morris, which each said last week that the dollar reduced their revenues by nearly $1bn in the first quarter. GE said currency swings hit profits by $120m, and Philip Morris reported a $585m hit to “operating companies income”.

Fears of a new Greek crisis are resurfacing and US economic data has disappointed of late, but corporate earnings are likely to be a key driving force for US equities this year, said Russ Koesterich, global chief investment strategist at Blackrock.

“For 2015, it will come down to earnings and whether companies can overcome a higher dollar,” he said.

Earnings reports so far have validated recent concerns over falling energy prices and a rising dollar that have led to the largest downgrade of earnings estimates since the financial crisis.

FactSet expects first-quarter earnings for the S&P 500 to decline 4 per cent and revenues to drop 3 per cent. But it expects both earnings and revenues to be down 10 per cent for companies that generate less than half their sales in the US.

Between the end of October and mid-March, the dollar index – which measures the greenback against a basket of its peers – climbed 15 per cent.

The euro suffered its biggest quarterly decline against the dollar since it was created in 1999, and many strategists hastily brought forward their target date for the dollar reaching parity with its transatlantic partner, although that expectation has been tempered by poor US economic data.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-19 17:53:46

“as far as I know” :)

Hillary Clinton Stokes False Rumors about Obama’s Faith - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ - 190k -

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 18:32:49

Is home price appreciation grinding to a halt?

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 18:35:18

Home Prices Fall in Fewer Chinese Cities as Demand Grows
6:00 PM PST
April 17, 2015
China home prices
Residential buildings in Beijing. Housing sales last month fell from a year earlier, while property investment growth slumped to the slowest since at least 2013.
Photographer: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg

Fewer Chinese cities saw home prices fall last month as demand got a boost from two interest-rate cuts since November and the removal of property curbs.

New-home prices dropped from a month earlier in 49 of the 70 cities tracked by the government, the National Bureau of Statistics said on Saturday, compared with slides in 66 in February. The average price fell for an 11th consecutive month, bringing the decline from a year earlier to 6.1 percent, the steepest on record, according to Bloomberg calculations.

The government eased mortgage policies at the end of March, adding to loosening steps since September to aid an industry that has been weighing on economic growth. Home prices fell from a year earlier last month in all 70 cities, while property investment growth slumped to the slowest since at least 2013 in the first quarter.

“Improving prices and turnover showed a seasonal recovery by the market itself,” Xia Dan, a Shanghai-based analyst at Bank of Communications Co., wrote in a research note. “As policies start to take effect, transactions are expected to keep improving slightly. In case the recovery of the housing market doesn’t meet expectation, there will be further policy adjustments.”

Home sales surged 66 percent from February, a period typically weak due to a week-long holiday, and will stabilize further in the coming months as the looser policies take effect, the statistics bureau said in a separate statement.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 18:43:17

Barron’s Cover
Nearing Peak, U.S. Home Price Gains to Slow
The three-year rally in housing prices is losing a little steam but should continue for another year or two.
By Jonathan R. Laing
April 18, 2015

Go figure. Just as several measures of U.S. economic growth appear poised to accelerate, the three-year residential real estate market recovery is showing signs of slowing.

Strong job growth, falling unemployment, ultralow mortgage rates, and encouraging consumer confidence figures haven’t been enough to boost monthly sales of existing homes, as tracked by the National Association of Realtors. They’ve been running below their previous annual pace of around five million transactions in recent months, much to the surprise of most experts.

Of course, some slowing is to be expected, following their stellar climb from the depths of the financial crisis, when home prices nationally fell 35%, subtracting nearly $8 trillion from Americans’ home equity. More recently, prices rose 8% in 2012, 11% in 2013, and 5% in 2014, much as Barron’s had predicted they would in each of those years. Rising sales in Dallas and Denver, for example, mean houses now cost more than they did back in 2006; and other markets, such as Boston, Charlotte, Portland, and San Francisco, are very close to their peaks, according to figures from Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller.

Various housing experts, including Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, and Lawrence Yun, chief economist at NAR, see solid growth continuing, albeit at a more languid pace of 4% or so this year and next. That would be a little more in line with an expected increase of 2.7% in U.S. output in 2015 and 2016 and rising average wage rates.

Helping sustain the recent healthy pace of growth is the strength in housing prices in major cities that don’t include outlying, poorer-performing blue-collar counties and exurbs. For instance, another realty data cruncher, Local Market Monitor, which takes into account an area’s income and employment figures, as well as job and population growth and building-permit activity, sees more boom areas than S&P/Case-Shiller. The company’s founder, Ingo Winzer, says San Francisco, Dallas, Houston, and Denver have all moved to peak valuations, while Honolulu, Nashville, Raleigh, Salt Lake City, Portland, and Seattle also are near or at all-time highs.

We think 4% growth in prices is a reasonable expectation over the next year or two, particularly in light of the strange dichotomy between economic and housing data that could prevent more rapid increases. While the split between a gradually rising rate of economic growth and a gradually slowing housing market is unlikely to result in a dramatic immediate change in housing prices in the next couple of years, it’s enough to raise questions about whether a more important, longer-term shift is under way.

Looking out a little further, say to 2017-2019, Bank of America Merrill Lynch mortgage-backed securities strategist Chris Flanagan sees the possibility that home prices could start to decline. By then, he says, prices will be subject to slowing growth in buyers’ disposable income and the inevitable end in speculative purchases by professional investors.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 18:53:04

Analyst Predicts Home Price Decline In Report to White House
September 18, 2014

Former Goldman Sachs executive Joshua Pollard sent a sobering 18-page report to the White House on September 17 warning of a potential downturn in home prices that could put the country back into a recession before the ripples of the previous one settle.

According to Pollard, the former head of the Goldman’s housing research team, home price appreciation is outpacing income, and the United States is on the brink of a 15 percent decline in home prices over the next three years. Rising interest rates and values will cause already overvalued homes (Pollard says values are 12 percent higher than they should be) to be even further out of sync with reality and generate an unnatural surplus that will itself lead to a slowdown in investor purchases.

Flipped homes have declined 50 percent in the last year, and home flippers are losing money outright in New York City, San Francisco, and Las Vegas according to the report.

If Pollard is correct, the impact on the U.S. economy would be seismic. Overvalued homes, according to his report to President Obama, make up $23 trillion of consumer asset value and “serve as the psychological linchpin” for $17 trillion of invested capital.

Put together, that 15 percent decline translates to a $3.4 trillion cut to consumers’ net worth.

“As an economist, statistician and housing expert, I am lamentably confident that home prices will fall,” he wrote. “Home price devaluation will expose a major financial imbalance that could lower an entire generation’s esteem for the American dream.”

Student debt and a 45 percent underemployment rate for recent college grads has handicapped millennial buyers already, Pollard wrote.

Pollard outlined three distinct stages of the decline—the first of which, the “hot-to-cool” stage, is already underway. This is where home price growth slows and turns negative in large markets across the country. Investors slow their purchases, homebuilders lose pricing power as absorption rates decline, and press outlets shift their market pieces from positive to mixed.

In Stage II, the “demand-to-supply” phase, new negative shocks cause investors to shift from raising prices in an effort to outbid competition to reducing prices to beat future declines. In Stage III, the “deflation and response” phase, consumers come to the decision that now is a bad time to buy a home. Fewer people seek mortgages and banks become less willing to lend. Consequently, deflation hits, taking jobs with it and triggering calls for new policy.

 
 
Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 18:41:42

I rallied a base.

Comment by rallying the base
2015-04-19 18:52:07

What does “rallying the base” mean exactly?

For the Democrat party, it means any opportunity of redistribution, any shred of an opportunity to poke their greedy beaks in and TAKE.

For the Sheldon Adelson bought and paid for Republican self-proclaimed “conservatives” watching anyone wearing a uniform (badge optional) kicking the sh*t out of, or just murdering, somebody with brown or black skin

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-04-19 19:09:00

What does “rallying the base” mean exactly?

It means herding the flock of sheep onto your incorporated global plantation.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 20:11:33

Are you worried the stock market crash will continue tomorrow? Or is it safe to rest assured that the Plunge Protection Team will extinguish the flames of financial market contagion before the global financial economy goes up in smoke?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:15:49

Markets Live: China easing shrugged off
Date
April 20, 2015 - 1:02PM
Patrick Commins, Jens Meyer

Shares are sharply lower in a broad sell-off, as Friday night’s heavy losses in global markets spills on to the ASX, despite news of Chinese policy easing.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:22:26

China’s economy
Coming down to earth
Chinese growth is losing altitude. Will it be a soft or hard landing?
Apr 18th 2015 | ZHENGZHOU | From the print edition
Timekeeper

WHEN “60 Minutes”, an American television news programme, visited a new district in the metropolis of Zhengzhou in 2013, it made it the poster-child for China’s property bubble. “We found what they call a ghost city,” said Lesley Stahl, the host. “Uninhabited for miles and miles and miles and miles.” Two years on, she would not be able to say the same. The empty streets where she stood have a steady stream of cars. Workers saunter out of offices at lunchtime. Laundry hangs in the windows of the subdivisions.

The new district (pictured), on the eastern side of Zhengzhou, a city of 9m in central China, took off when the provincial and city governments relocated many of their offices there. Then, high schools with university-sized campuses began admitting students, drawing families to the area. Last autumn one of the world’s biggest children’s hospitals opened, a gleaming facility with cheery colours and 1,100 beds. Chen Jinbo, one of the area’s earlier residents, bemoans the lost quiet of a few years ago. “Rush hour is a hassle now.”

The success of Zhengzhou’s development belies some of the worst fears about China’s overinvestment. What appear to be ghost cities can, with the right catalysts and a bit of time, acquire flesh and bones. Yet it also marks a turning-point for the Chinese economy. Zhengzhou still has ambitious plans, not least for a massive logistics hub around its airport. With such a big urban area already built up, though, vast construction projects have a progressively smaller impact on the economy. The city’s GDP growth fell to 9.3% last year from an average of more than 13% over the preceding decade. The downward trend will continue. As the capital of Henan, one of the country’s poorest provinces, Zhengzhou had anchored the country’s last, large, fast-growth frontier. Its maturation signals that the slowing of China’s economy is not a cyclical blip but a structural downshift.

When growth flagged in powerful coastal provinces a few years ago, the poorer interior picked up the slack. It was large enough to do so, for a time. Henan and the other inland provinces that have a similar level of income per head have 430m residents, nearly a third of China’s total. If they were a sovereign country, they would form the world’s seventh-biggest economy, ahead of both Brazil and India. The far west is China’s final underdeveloped region but it carries much less weight: it makes up less than a tenth of the national population.

So the question for China is not whether growth will rebound to anything like the double-digit pace of the past. Instead, it is whether its slowdown will be a gradual descent—a little bumpy at times but free from crisis—or a sudden, dangerous lurch lower. Figures released on April 15th revealed a further loss of altitude: GDP in the first quarter grew by 7% from a year earlier, the lowest since the depths of the global financial crisis in early 2009. Signs of stress are emerging: capital is leaving the country, public finances are more stretched and bad debts are rising.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:36:19

China to Investors: Don’t Forget That Stocks Can Lose Money Too
by Ye Xie
Stephen E Stapczynski
9:17 AM PST
April 19, 2015

After the longest-ever rally in Chinese equities, investors are getting a reminder that the $7.3 trillion market isn’t just a one-way bet.

China’s securities regulator jolted traders after the close of local bourses Friday when it banned a source of financing for margin trades and made it easier for short sellers to wager that stocks will fall. Offshore futures and exchange-traded funds linked to the world’s second-largest stock market sank, with the iShares China Large-Cap ETF tumbling 4.2 percent in the U.S. The Shanghai Composite Index dropped 0.4 percent at 9:54 a.m. local time.

While China bulls will draw some comfort from the central bank’s biggest cut to lenders’ reserve requirements since 2008 on Sunday, last week’s sell-off in offshore markets shows how vulnerable the Shanghai Composite is to a pullback after going 452 days without a 10 percent drop from a recent high. The benchmark gauge posted an average peak-to-trough retreat of 28 percent after six previous rounds of policy intervention to curtail stock speculation since 1996, according to Bank of America Corp.

“Institutional investors as well as authorities have had some concerns over the sharp rise in prices and trading,” Michael Kass, a New York-based money manager at Baron Capital Inc., whose $1.53 billion emerging-markets fund has outperformed 95 percent of peers tracked by Bloomberg over the past three years, said by e-mail on Friday. “This will likely cool some of the recent enthusiasm.”

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:39:14

Key-rash…

China Market Called Sharply Lower On Monday
By RTT News, April 19, 2015, 09:00:00 PM EDT

(RTTNews.com) - The China stock market has tracked to the upside in consecutive trading days, surging more than 200 points or 5 percent on its way to a fresh seven-year closing high. The Shanghai Composite Index finished just below the 4,290-point plateau, although the market is primed for some major damage on Monday.

The global forecast for the Asian markets is soft thanks to ongoing concerns over growth in Europe and debt woes in Greece. The European and U.S. markets were down on Friday and the Asian bourses are expected to open in similar fashion.

In addition, China shares figure to fall under heavy pressure not just on profit taking, but because Chinese regulators have expanded the supply of shares available for short sellers while clamping down on over-the-counter margin trading.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:44:24

Craig Stephen’s This Week in China
Opinion: Can Beijing tame China’s bull market?
Published: Apr 19, 2015 10:50 p.m. ET
By Craig Stephen
Columnist

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Authorities in China face the delicate task of taming an equity bull market of their own making, which could now be spiraling out of control.

Last week, the announcement of new measures to allow fund managers to short stocks not only hit Chinese shares, but also spooked the global markets. This was followed up by warnings from China’s securities regulator to small investors not to borrow money or sell property to buy stocks.

A warning for equity bulls to cool off certainly looks overdue. Stock turnover reached a record 1.53 trillion yuan ($247 billion) on Friday, with stock-trading accounts reportedly being opened at a rate of 1 million every two days. Margin account balances reached a record 1.16 trillion yuan.

But should global markets worry if day traders in Shenzhen or Shanghai are about to lose their shirts?

China’s casino-like equity markets are largely sealed off from the outside world, after all. Foreign ownership of domestic Chinese shares is still a fraction of 1%, even with new initiatives such as the recent opening of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect.

The concern for global markets, however, is not equity-market contagion but the potential hole a stock-market bust could blow in the world’s second-largest economy.

This bull run is taking place as the Chinese economy slumps under a sea of debt, with exports now also going south along with the property market.

This hardly sounds like conditions ripe for rallying shares — but this is no normal rally.

The real wild card to consider is the fact that this bull market has the fingerprints of the ruling Communist Party all over it. They initiated it, meaning an official policy shift could also see it reverse — although that looks unlikely for now.

Official state media have been cheerleading this rally by extolling the benefits of share ownership in a series of articles since last year.

But what has really unleashed “animal spirits” of day traders has been the re-opening of the domestic initial public offering (IPO) market. Thanks to systematic underpricing orchestrated by the state regulator, investors have been all but guaranteed spectacular gains.

According to a first-quarter report from accountants Ernst & Young, there were 70 domestic Chinese IPOs, all of which rose by the maximum 44% allowed on the first day of trading. Average gains for IPOs have been around 200% this year.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:47:54

China not trying to chill red-hot stock market, says regulator
Dow Jones
April 20, 2015 12:45PM

SHANGHAI-A day after it warned small investors about trading risks and expanded the use of a mechanism investors can use to bet against stocks, China’s securities regulator moved to allay fears that it wants to kill a breathtaking rally in the country’s stock market.

Analysts said the abrupt nature of the China Securities Regulatory Commission’s actions betrays a dilemma faced by the regulator between cooling a market that has doubled over 12 months and causing panic among vulnerable retail investors that account for the vast majority of stock trading in China.

In a statement published Saturday evening, the commission said measures rolled out on Friday, including tightening rules on margin lending and promoting the use of short selling, aren’t aimed at clamping down on a red-hot market.

The measures are about “maintaining the healthy development of the market,” the CSRC said in the statement. “They aren’t intended to encourage short selling, let alone depressing the market…the market shouldn’t over-interpret the measures.”

In separate announcements late Friday, the CSRC banned a type of financing called umbrella trusts that have provided cash for margin trading, the practice of borrowing against the value of common shares held at a brokerage, and placed limits on margin trading for high-risk small stocks that trade over the counter rather than on exchanges.

In an apparent effort to take some heat off a soaring market, the CSRC also announced that it would allow fund managers to lend shares for short selling, or betting against stocks. To short a stock, an investor borrows shares and sells them, hoping the price will fall so that they can repurchase them and repay the loan with the cheaper shares and make a profit.

The Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges also announced that they would make it easier for investors to engage in short selling by pushing for an increase in the supply of shares available for lending and increase the number of stocks whose shares can be borrowed.

Compared with the recently robust margin-financing business, which benefits from a rising market, short selling businesses have grown at a much slower pace in China because of difficulties in borrowing shares.

The market has indeed risen too fast and the regulator clearly wants to clamp down on speculation and pierce the bubble. However, Chinese retail investors have a very fragile state of mind,” said Shen Meng, executive director of Chanson Capital, a boutique investment bank.

The Shanghai Composite Index, home to China’s biggest stocks, surged 6.3 per cent last week and has jumped 14 per cent this month. After years of listless trading, the index has doubled over the past 12 months.

By contrast, the small-company-rich ChiNext Price Index-up 73 per cent for the year when the week began-recorded its first weekly loss since January, dropping 3.5 per cent. Among its components are startups listed on the Shenzhen stock market.

Friday’s announcements raised fears of a selloff in China.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 21:13:21

“…not trying to chill the red-hot market…”

Why do communist propagandists always feel compelled to include the ridiculous contradictory disclaimers to their actual intentions?

 
 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:51:25

Most Chinese stocks drop as new margin rules overshadow RRR cut
Date
April 20, 2015 - 12:57PM
Kyoungwha Kim
Chinese investors have been piling into the equity market after the central bank cut interest rates twice since November
Photo: Reuters

Most Chinese stocks fell on high volume as investors weighed new restrictions on using leverage for share trading and a move by the central bank to cut reserve ratios.

Shanghai Wangsu Science & Technology Co. slumped 5 per cent to lead declines for technology companies. The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced measures on Friday to clamp down on the use of shadow financing for equity purchases and increase the supply of shares available for short sellers. PetroChina Co. plunged 2.3 per cent. Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. jumped 2.7 per cent in Hong Kong as the People’s Bank of China said reserve- requirement ratios will be cut 1 percentage point from Monday.

About three stocks slid for every one that rose on the Shanghai Composite Index, which slipped 0.1 per cent to 4,281.76 at 10:11 a.m. Shanghai trading volumes were 93 per cent above the 30-day average, while 100-day volatility was the highest since January 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“The market will be very volatile in the next few days,” said Jeffrey Chiu, a Hong Kong based trader at Winnington Capital Ltd. “We will monitor demand for short selling.”

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:54:00

Are the results predictable when central bankers tap the brakes and push the pedal to the metal at the same time?

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 20:56:43

Do y’all recall how Ben Bernanke used to constantly comment on how many tools he had left in his toolbox to combat the financial crisis?

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 21:00:11

Free exchange
Economics
China’s policy easing
Mr Li’s toolbox
Apr 19th 2015, 14:59 by S.R. | SHANGHAI
Timekeeper

LI KEQIANG, China’s premier, is fond of saying that the government has plenty of tools in its toolbox to combat the economy’s slowdown. Rummaging through the kit, the central bank produced a big wrench on Sunday: a 1 percentage-point reduction in the amount of cash that lenders must lock up as reserves. It is the largest cut in Chinese banks’ required reserve ratio (RRR) since late 2008, the nadir of the global financial crisis. It frees up nearly 1.3 trillion yuan ($210 billion) for new lending, money that should help shore up growth. It is likely, however, to also pour fuel on an already-sizzling stockmarket.

Judging by economic data alone, the move comes as little surprise. Nominal growth in the first quarter slumped to 5.8% from a year earlier, the lowest since the first quarter of 2009. Factory production is weak, lending growth has slowed and deflation is beginning to rear its head. China launched its easing cycle last November (it has cut interest rates twice and RRR once since then), and Mr Li has pledged to do more to support growth if needed. Additional policy easing seemed a foregone conclusion after all the sluggish recent data.

But the timing of the cut is something of a surprise. With the stockmarket up by three-quarters in six months and its surge only intensifying over the past two weeks, many thought the government might shy away from easing until the rally ebbed. Indeed, some bet that its first priority was to cool the surging market. After trading hours on Friday, the securities regulator announced that it would rein in leveraged stock purchases and also increase the number of shares available for shorting. This fuelled a steep sell-off in Chinese index futures in overseas markets (one contract in New York tumbled by as much as 6%). Traders who dumped those futures on Friday may well suffer whiplash on Monday: RRR cuts are almost always read by local investors as a cue to buy shares. The government thus appears to be more concerned about the risks of slowing growth than of a stock bubble, at least for the time being.

The RRR cut can also be seen as a small part of China’s financial reform push, which is discussed in our most recent issue. Required reserves play little role in the monetary policies of developed economies. In China, however, they have formed a crucial component of the framework for keeping the yuan steady. In the past, when foreign cash streamed into China via its trade surplus and amid speculative inflows, the central bank printed billions of yuan every month to soak up the flood. That would normally have been expected to cause inflation, but the central bank counteracted the effect by forcing lenders to lock up a large portion of the resulting cash as reserves. At its peak in 2011, China’s RRR reached 21.5%, a level with little precedent in other countries.

While China is still running a hefty trade surplus, speculative flows have become much more volatile. Cash enters the country some months and leaves it other months. With reduced inflows from abroad, the central bank no longer needs to intervene so heavily in the currency market. But it does need to come up with new ways of creating liquidity for the financial system. The most obvious is to normalise monetary policy by cutting RRR. Even with Sunday’s reduction, the ratio for the biggest banks sits at 18.5%—amounting to more than 20 trillion yuan worth of cash. Mr Li’s toolbox is far from empty.

 
Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 21:14:28

“plenty of tools”

That certainly is what it takes to inflate a bubble.

Comment by Whac-A-Bubble™
2015-04-19 21:17:50

Why do megalomaniacs take pleasure in encouraging greater tools to buy assets at bubblelicious prices? Why not just let the free market pick winners and losers, rather than attempting to steadfastly manipulate economic destiny through command-and-control measures?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 21:30:12

CNNMoney (New York) April 15, 2015: 10:10 PM ET
Bubble trouble: China’s stock market looks too hot
By Matt Egan
Stock market fever is sweeping China.

Chinese equities are officially on fire. The Shanghai Composite has skyrocketed 78% since just before Halloween. It recently crested the 4,000 level for the first time since the financial crisis.

Yet stocks in China have achieved red-hot status just as the country’s economy is going through a cooling off period. Growth slowed to the weakest pace since 2009.

In other words, exuberance for Chinese stocks isn’t being backed up by fundamentals. Instead, the market is being carried higher by various forms of government stimulus and investor frenzy.

All of this raises the question: Is China in the midst of a bubble? And if it is, what should American investors do?

“Certainly a bubble exists,” said Ankur Patel, chief investment officer at R-Squared Macro Management.

Rather than enjoy the ride up or try to profit from its eventual popping, Patel said the prudent move for U.S. retail investors is to stay away from the Chinese market altogether.

“The problem with any bubble is if you try to bet against it, bubbles can become even more irrational. The herd mentality can essentially run investors over,” he said.

In recent years, people in China — who tend to save significantly more than their Western counterparts — sunk their excess savings into the real estate market.

Now that the bubble in housing is deflating, they are latching onto the skyrocketing stock market. Investors opened 4.8 million new stock trading accounts in March and then another million more in early April, according to the Financial Times.

“There’s no question there’s a lot of domestic euphoria about equities within China,” said Albert Brenner, director of asset allocation strategy at People’s United Wealth Management.

Several Chinese retail investors polled by CNNMoney said they trade stocks frequently — up to several times a day — in part to have fun. One Shanghai woman, who didn’t give her full name, said she’s not worried about trading expenses hurting performance because “fees tend to drop during bullish markets anyway.”

Non-Chinese investors are also taking notice. Exchange-traded funds that track China — the best way for U.S. investors to play China — have soared. The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) are both up over 20% so far this year.

Liquidity-fueled bubble?

Hoping to avoid a so-called “hard landing,” China’s central bank is pumping liquidity into the market by cutting rates. That’s good for risky assets like stocks, but liquidity-driven moves are susceptible to bubbles.

Liquidity is also being pumped by the Hong-Kong Shanghai Stock Connect Program, which allows investors to buy Shanghai stocks through Hong Kong — and vice versa. Not only is fresh foreign capital flowing onto Mainland China for the first time, but excess liquidity inside China is flooding into Hong Kong.

Goldman Sachs isn’t worried: Of course, not everyone believes it’s time to call China’s rapid rise a bubble.

Timothy Moe, co-head of macro research in Asia at Goldman Sachs, told CNBC the market “certainly is getting frothy” amid “very frenetic retail activity.”

Is that a bubble that will crash the system? The answer is not yet,” Moe said.

In other words, just because Chinese stocks look very speculative doesn’t mean the party has to end today.

One possibility, Patel said, is for the bubble to end “benignly” if China’s growth regains momentum, justifying current valuations. He said that looks unlikely and there’s a better chance the opposite will occur.

Another possible outcome is the stock market keeps roaring ahead before imploding, like it did the last time.

To be clear, what’s underway in China is an out-and-out bubble, but there’s plenty of money to be made riding bubbles up a bit,” Bespoke Investment Group wrote in a note to clients. The firm said it “may be worthwhile to consider a small position” in Chinese ETFs like the SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC).

Just remember: Bubbles are notoriously difficult to time, even for sophisticated investors.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 23:02:05

The Wall Street Journal
Europe braces for messy Greek endgame
Published: Apr 19, 2015 6:42 p.m. ET
Reuters
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras in a photograph from February.
By Simon Nixon

It’s still possible that Greece can remain in the eurozone — though that is no longer the base case for many policy makers. At the very least, most fear the situation is going to get much, worse before it gets any better.

No one now expects a deal to unlock Greek bailout funding at this week’s meeting of eurozone finance ministers in Riga — originally set as the final deadline for a deal. The new final, final deadline is now said to be a summit on May 11.

But among European politicians and officials gathered in Washington DC last week for the International Monetary Fund’s Spring Meetings, there was little optimism that a deal will be agreed by then.

The two sides are no closer to an agreement than when the Greek government took office almost three months ago. “Nothing, literally nothing has been achieved,” says an official. In fact, it is worse than that: so far, the bulk of Athens’s reform plans would actually cost money or reduce government revenues, according to eurozone officials.

They say that when you add up all the government’s proposals, the budget surplus required under the current program turns into a 10-15% deficit while debt soars far above the 120% of GDP targeted for 2022. There is no way that the eurozone — let alone the IMF — could disburse funds on the basis of such fantastical numbers.

The bottom line is that Athens won’t get any money unless it can reach a deal that satisfies the IMF that Greek debt is on a sustainable path and that it has a medium-term funding plan in place. The eurozone won’t disburse its own bailout funds without a deal that carries this IMF seal of approval.

The IMF has agreed to streamline its demands, but that hardly diminishes the scale of the compromise required of Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras; even a slimmed-down deal will require either Athens to commit to an ambitious third bailout program or the eurozone to agree to provide substantial debt relief—which it won’t until Athens can convince the eurozone it is serious about reform.


Comments

Ravil D
2 hours ago

It appears that the global market is being hijacked by Greece issue. And that too it appears that Greece wants free handouts and that too under their own terms - Beggars can’t be Chooser!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-04-19 23:05:00

China’s media cheers stocks, as market hits seven-year high
Published: Apr 20, 2015 1:14 a.m. ET
By Laura He
Asia markets reporter
Reuters

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Despite a weak start on Monday as investors digested Beijing’s new market measures announced late last Friday, the Shanghai Composite Index (SHCOMP, -0.26%) managed to set a new seven-year intraday high.

The recent run-up for stocks is making big news in China. Here’s what the media were saying about the market Monday — as you’ll see, most of it is very optimistic about the future direction of shares:

Can’t stop the market

“New rules to curb margin trading won’t change the bull market, “ the People’s Daily (the Communist Party’s official newspaper) said Monday in an editorial. “They are aimed at regulating the market and will be positive for the market in the long term.”

It noted that some investors have been speculating that the Chinese government may be seeking to suppress the hot stock market with Friday’s moves by curbing margin trading and encouraging short-selling. However, the report quoted Ren Zeping, managing director for Guotai Junan Securities, as saying that “no matter whether the news is bullish or bearish, it won’t change the current big trend of a bull market.”

The report concluded that “the bull market is not over yet. Nevertheless, hopefully we’ll enter a market phase of a ‘slow bull’” with more moderate gains.

‘A healthy bull’

The state-run Xinhua News Agency also published a special report Sunday night, which like the People’s Daily, quoted Guotai Junan’s Ren, focusing on his desire for less volatility.

“Transitioning from a quick bull to a slow bull will be a win-win situation for both the regulators and markets, while a sharp rise or a steep fall will be a lose-lose,” Ren told Xinhua.

The report looked not only at Friday’s new market rules, but also a sharp easing of monetary policy announced earlier Sunday by the People’s Bank of China. All of these government actions were intended to fight the economic slowdown and create a “healthy bull market,” Xinhua said.

Year of the Blue Chip

“The upward trend of stock markets will not change, despite short-term volatility,” the state-run China Securities Journal said on Monday, claiming Sunday’s central-bank move — which involved cutting banks’ required reserve ratio — had laid a solid foundation for the bull market and was a positive factor for stocks.

While it admitted that some shares were entering bubble territory, the report said investors were reacting by turning to reliable blue chips, as well as the “lowland stocks” (meaning “dogs,” or stocks with lower valuations).

“The bull market is entering a ‘blue [chip] season’,” the newspaper said.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-04-20 06:07:11

phony scandals

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post