The Housing Bubble

Can you ever go back to how it was, after drinking the nectar of easy money?

Greece may not even have the sugar to make Greek coffee.

So, do we short the Bank of Canada or is there an ETF for this?

Ill go in with $5000

True dat.

Except the South is still attracting businesses Alabama just landed Airbus, all you attract in the North Country is mosquitoes.

Should say that Airbus just started production in Alabama they were attracted to it a few years ago:

http://www.airbus.com/company/americas/us/alabama/

Funny thing about that confederate flag.

When I moved to SE Florida in the early 80s there was still a majority of Crackers (a term that I was told meant 2nd or 3rd generation Floridian) especially in construction. Although considered an insult today it was a point of pride to them at that time.

I remember being shocked seeing the confederate flag on the hood of pickup trucks, hats, shirts etc. and being treated like an outsider and with suspicion. Not because I was black (which I’m not) but because I was from Connecticut. Before I changed my plates I would be driving south on US1 to work and rednecks would honk the horn pointing north telling me to go home.

On the jobs the black guys and the Crackers got along fine but they damn sure did not like “Yankees”.

A lot has changed since the early 80s and today you have to drive a couple of hours north of here to get to the south and I clearly understand why people would take the confederate flag as a racist statement. I am also sure there are some who embrace it for that reason. But my experience with the people who displayed it was a dislike for Northerners not black people and a sense of pride.

Replace it with the Russian flag and display busts of Putin. That’d give some “folks” real heartburn.

Jeff, your personal anecdote, while touching, is meaningless

The “progressives” will script the narrative on this

Language is beyond media, it is about CONTROL

Confederate Flag Campaign Pins Of Both Clintons’ Pasts

Kerry Picket
Reporter
2:56 PM 06/23/2015

Although Confederate flags and emblems they attached themselves to are wiped off store shelves by management and local DMV license plate offices in Virginia, then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton and Tennessee Sen. Al Gore flaunted the symbol during their 1992 campaign for the White House.

Looking to capture the south back from Republicans, Democrats nominated a pair of Ivy League-educated, southern men who could campaign in the deep south to a demographic that felt cast off by Democrats at the time.

Rectangular Clinton-Gore 1992 pins campaign pins of the Confederate flag were passed around, as well as a circular Confederate flag pin showing both Clinton’s and Gore’s heads atop of grey Confederate uniforms with the words “Sons of the New South” emblazoned on the pin.

The pandering did not stop with Bill. His wife and now Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton got in on the Confederate flag campaign action in 2008 during her first run for president. One campaign South Carolina primary pin is a circular Confederate Flag with the words “Arkansas Travelers In Support of Hillary Clinton For President.” It’s currently going for around $400.00 on EBay.

Alabama Democrats made a similar button for Mrs. Clinton at the time. However, at the bottom of the flag shown on the pin are the words “Heritage not Hate.” This pin is selling for around $300.00. Hillary Clinton Confederate Flag

Paul Begala, co-chair of the Hillary Clinton Super PAC said on CNN that Clinton will have to answer for standing by her husband when both defended Arkansas’s own flag that has a blue star, representing its membership in the Confederacy.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/23/confederate-flag-campaign-pins-of-both-clintons-pasts/#ixzz3dzO78PBp

Obama And Hillary Both Had No Problem Using Confederate Flag During Presidential Campaigns

Now, suddenly the flag ‘belongs in a museum’

by Steve Watson | InfoWars | June 24, 2015

In the wake of the Charleston shooting, and subsequent pictures of the shooter posing with a Confederate flag, Barack Obama this week said that the flag belongs in a museum.

It seems he has changed his tune in the last three years somewhere, however, given that he was using the symbol during his 2012 re-election campaign.

Indeed, Obama had his own Confederate flag campaign badge, which states “Where the confederate flag still flies, we have built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.”

The quote was taken from Obama’s racially heated speech in 2008, during which he also praised his mentor former pastor the controversial Reverend Wright.

Obama was not alone in using the symbol of the Confederate flag, synonymous with the South, to solicit political support.

Hillary clinton had her own brand of Confederate merchandise in 2008.

Replace it with the Russian flag and display busts of Putin. That’d give some “folks” real heartburn.

While we are at it put Putin on the ten dollar bill.

Seriously, if you wanted to give some true heartburn to the bluenosin’ ninnies, put up Russian flags all over the south. They’ll get real nervous, on account of Putin might decided he wants to protect his interests in the US. LMAO!

Putin-worship is a good example of those who think freedom means the freedom for them to control the actions of others who they think are hurting their feelings/morality/society.

They look at Putin’s thugs beating protesters, dissidents, and gays and think, ‘now that’s freedom!’.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend, it is nothing more than that. However, because I believe in nations and not world government, I think the Russians are free to choose the leader they want and if they want to enforce the values of the Russian Orthodox Church, they are free to do that too. Only when a country degenerates into a genocide should a country even consider interfering in the internal politics of another country

Putin, the only world leader willing to give Edward Snowden shelter.

Keep on rockin’ in the free world, Oddie!

“Keep on rockin’ in the free world, Oddie!”

I’d like to. Has Putin released Pussy Riot from the gulag yet for playing a funny protest song in a church?

Last I knew, one of the skanks was released, two are still there, having “issues” with fellow inmates.

of course you would have no problem with someone desecrating a church.

“of course you would have no problem with someone desecrating a church”

Good to see you stand up for liberty and free speech.

Putin, the only world leader willing to give Edward Snowden shelter.

Well, we took in Solzhenitsyn. So it’s hypocrisy all around.

Good to see you stand up for liberty and free speech.

Desecrating a church is not free speech, it is a crime but you cannot see the difference. The left is amazing on this board it chides a conservative for stating a private website is not respecting the first amendment but then believes that the first amendment allows someone to go into a church and commit an act of desecration.

“of course you would have no problem with someone desecrating a church”

Good to see you stand up for liberty and free speech.

Last time I checked, churches were private property.

Exactly my point up above. To go on to private property contrary to desire of the owner is trespass. Certainly, no church wants to be desecrated. Now, we may argue about the appropriate sentence but it is a crime to do what Pussy Riot did and the Russians have special provisions to protect houses of worship and that is their right too.

“Last time I checked, churches were private property”

The church was open to the public and there was no rule against playing music there. The members of the band were arrested a day after the event, after it had been posted on social media, for ‘hooliganism with religious hatred’ or some such religious/statist nonsense.

You can pretend the charges and sentences were reasonable compared to the ‘crime’, if you have a tendency to excuse dictators and their abuse of power when destroying political opposition. Perhaps like some you look at the persecution of the band members and think, ‘now that’s freedom! I wish I could live in a country where I was free to abuse weirdos and skanks like that!’

That’s freedom to them.

“The three detained members of Pussy Riot were declared political prisoners by the Union of Solidarity with Political Prisoners (SPP).[80] On March 25, Amnesty International named them prisoners of conscience due to “the severity of the response of the Russian authorities”.[15]”
wikipedia

Sandy Hook was an inside job by DHS under direct orders from Obama

And it failed miserably in accomplishing anything. Anyone who believes these conspiracy theories should be quite happy to see NOTHING HAPPENED. Talk about secure gun rights. 20 first graders and NOTHING CHANGED.

There will be more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-t8PngHgWY - 277k -
———————————————————————
By Kyle Balluck - 05/25/14 02:52 PM EDT

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Sunday predicted that there will be more “devastating attacks” like the one near the University of California, Santa Barbara if universal background checks are not passed.

“We must ask ourselves if an individual whose family called police with concerns about mental health, who is receiving therapy and who has had several run-ins with police should be allowed to own multiple firearms and hundreds of rounds of ammunition,” the California Democrat said in a statement.

“Unfortunately, the NRA continues to have a stranglehold on Congress, preventing even commonsense measures like universal background checks that have overwhelming support,” she added. “Until that happens, we will continue to see these devastating attacks. Shame on us for allowing this to continue.”

thehill.com/…/senate/207203-feinstein-shame-on-us-for-allowing-this-to-continue - 170k -

So her prediction was correct, although most Americans probably could have made the same prediction.

“So her prediction was correct,”

She helped put the budgets together for these devastating attacks.

Here is one where a “witness” from a fraternity shows the “crime scene” from the murders the night before. no crime tape and no blood stains mind you which is hard “impossible” to believe.

He goes on to say at 3:00 1 was dead at 3:41 another one passed away (pretty good for a frat brother). At 4:06 the 3rd victim says she was shot in the kidney (What!? how the hell does she know where she was shot?) at 4:11 he could tell she had been shot in the kidney so Dr. Fratboy tells her she is going to be OK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1z_Z6i0cnA - 286k -

Here we have “witnesses” who at :20 say BMW my director’s talking with a shoulder nudge from the much bigger but obviously smarter actor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlZDvnpqvF0 - 269k -

Lastly quite possibly the worst (and that’s saying something) crisis actor to date.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAoKDjDKap0 - 312k -

our laws

I think it is fine to streamline the mental health system. We do not need the homeless drug addicted mental health patients on the streets. Whatever got changed to allow this needs to be changed back.

I suppose there are many ways to police getting the gun from the mentally ill person. Have a doctor ask if they have a gun. Have them or their family turn it in. Check what records of firearm ownership exist (cops do this all the time when responding to calls) and then have someone go get it. There are many ways, some more practical than others.

How about something simple like streamlining our mental health system so when people start making threats and they have been diagnosed with a serious mental health illness and the family requests that he or she is detained, they go directly into a mental health facility and they do not pass start and they are not released as soon as they are stabilized but when it is clear that they will not pose a threat in the future.

That sounds likes a complete absence of due process, Mr. Lawyer.

Wait a second there, did you not see this?

‘when it is clear that they will not pose a threat in the future’

He used the word “threat”! That trumps everything.

That sounds likes a complete absence of due process, Mr. Lawyer.

I did not address court review and there must be court review, but constitutional due process does not even require a hearing prior to actions being taken that are necessary to protect public safety. The problem today is that the laws have been written in such a manner that court’s hands are tied, it is not constitutional due process that is being implicated but statutory due process that leans too far in protecting the mentally ill person and does not respect the legitimate rights of family and society to be protected.

It probably is now.

Spoken like a true worshipper of the Almighty State

My SKS rifle isn’t

Has anyone noticed that the calls for gun control are loudest just after the PTB have lost a round on immigration and/or trade? I think internally they start to think that maintaining the kabuki theatre is getting too time consuming and the cost of manipulating public opinion is just too much. Better just to go for a dictatorship but those pesky guns get in the way.

“Better just to go for a dictatorship”

Don’t you always say democracy doesn’t work?

No, but I do say democracy is not working in the U.S. anymore. The founders believed in a certain level of intelligence to vote and while there are better methods now to demonstrate the proper level of intelligence, the need to avoid idiots that can easily be manipulated by the rich voting is greater than ever.

I’ll be curious to see how the dictatorship works now that there is an Internet. Has purchasing a firearm ever been easier in the last 30 years?

The founders believed in a certain level of intelligence to vote I doubt that there’s any evidence of that, unless their “beliefs” included notions that land ownership was an indication of intelligence.

” Has purchasing a firearm ever been easier in the last 30 years?”

Just encourage every African American southerner to purchase an automatic rifle, and watch how fast opinions of the Second Amendment will change.

I would think that most rural blacks in the South already do own a semi-automatic weapon, very few whites or blacks own an automatic weapon and that ownership is highly regulated.

By the way the only time that it would have been a real issue is when actually tyranny was being committed by the Democrats that were running the southern states up until the South flipped to the Republicans.

I doubt that there’s any evidence of that, unless their “beliefs” included notions that land ownership was an indication of intelligence.

You think there is no relationship to intelligence between land ownership at the time and intelligence? That is like saying there is no relationship between income and intelligence today.

“By the way the only time that it would have been a real issue is when actually tyranny was being committed by the Democrats that were running the southern states up until the South flipped to the Republicans.”

I doubt if there would have been the thousands of lynchings there were if blacks had had rifles to defend themselves. The preferred method was for a white mob or armed gang to grab some guy while he was alone or asleep in his house. And btw, if those mobs were around today, they would be 100% Fox News watching repubs.

It’s funny that those areas of the country that now call themselves conservative are the same areas of the country where people’s parents and grandparents took part in racially motivated communal murders. Whole towns all over the south would gather around to watch some black guy hanged. But rich white people weren’t bothered, so that’s not tyranny.

The children of people who owned land probably had better access to education. On the other hand, there were probably plenty of bright people who owned no land. Either way, the purpose of restricting voting to landowners probably had nothing to do with intelligence. The goal was mainly to keep political power in the hands of the wealthy.

During these periods of time when voting was restricted to land-owners, there were no income taxes. The only taxes were indirect taxes on property. Thus the people who had to pay the tax were the only ones who could vote on getting taxed. This was to avoid the general population from just voting to tax everyone who paid taxes. The current thing we call “the free shit army”.

That’s incorrect. There were import duties. There was also the “whiskey tax” that went into effect in 1791.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion

“Not a peep about any of them because it doesn’t fit the agenda.”

Speaking of which, as our chief race crime reporter, shouldn’t yo be giving us hourly updates on the Charleston racist shootings?

Oh, that’s right. White guy, black victims. It doesn’t fit the agenda.

“shouldn’t yo be giving us hourly updates on the Charleston racist shootings?”

I did last weekend.

But since you missed it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-t8PngHgWY - 277k -

“Oh, that’s right. White guy, black victims. It doesn’t fit the agenda.”

But they cost a lot more to produce.

Do you want me to read the card?

Not a peep about any of them because it doesn’t fit the agenda.

If the cops and the family and the neighbors all hushed up these crimes, how do you know about them?

Just not national news

By the way Mighty you’re slipping, you better watch it or they’re going to cut your pay.

HeyJackass!

Illustrating Chicago Values

Week in Progress (6/21 – 6/27)
Shot & Killed: 5
Shot & Wounded: 41
Total Shot: 46
Total Homicides: 5
2015 Stats

June to Date
Shot & Killed: 36
Shot & Wounded: 199
Total Shot: 235
Total Homicides: 39
2015 Stats

Year To Date
Shot & Killed: 182
Shot & Wounded: 1044
Total Shot: 1226
Total Homicides: 211
2015 Stats

heyjackass.com/ - 137k -

So “Not a peep about any of them because it doesn’t fit the agenda” refers to the national media. It doesn’t fit their agenda, but it does fit the agenda of the local media.

I’ll have to check out heyjackass.com some time. I’m sure that it must be fascinating. That little excerpt that you shared raises some interesting questions. If those crime statistics illustrate “Chicago values”, then those murders that you mentioned in South Florida must reflect the values of your region. And if there have been 211 homicides so far this year, but only 182 shot and killed, how did were the other 29 killed? Isn’t that an important story, the fact that murder that can be committed without a gun? Maybe it’s not part of the Chicago story.

Finally, I guess that it’s clear now that the focus has been shifted back to Chicago. We’re done talking about Baltimore now.

What’s to talk about it the main culprits were actually black officers. The prosecutor had to engage in overreaching to touch any white officers. Why not allow outside experts to look at the knife to see if it meets the criteria under the statute to be illegal? If it does then there is no reason to charge any of the white officers, in fact if it is even close there would be no reason to charge the officers since they would lack the requisite intent to be criminally charged. A simple mistake is not criminal intent.

Reagan restored the economy, won the cold war and increased the standard of living for working class people, Obama will add almost as much debt as all the Presidents combined that includes Bush I, Bush II and Reagan and accomplished nothing not even the saving of social security.

1. Reagan was a serial tax raiser
2. Reagan nearly tripled the federal budget deficit
3. Unemployment soared after Reagan’s 1981 tax cuts.
4. Reagan grew the size of the federal government tremendously.
5. Reagan did little to fight a woman’s right to choose.
6. Reagan gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants.
7. Reagan illegally funneled weapons to Iran.
8. Reagan helped create the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.

But, I am sure you knew this, Google it all, we call it “history.”

That list would be just like me saying that unemployment soared after Obama took office. It is true but leaves out so much critical detail that it would be a lie by omission. Of course, what is true is the recession ended without any of Obama’s policies making a material impact since the recession ended the Summer of 2009. Now, the weakest recovery on record, Obama owns that.

http://www.multpl.com/unemployment/table

As you can see unemployment went up by a full two percentage points under Obama the first year. Of course, it is just as much garbage as stating that unemployment rose after the passing of the Reagan tax cuts in 1981 since the final tax cut did not even happen to a few years later and virtually nothing occurred in 1981. But one interesting tidbit can be ascertained by looking at the table, as bad as Bush II was his average unemployment rate during his presidency will be far below Obama’s record. Recessions come and go and the usual rule is the deeper the recession the stronger the recovery, but Obama has created a clear exception to the rule.

And Califoh20, you’re forgetting the demographics, and it’s a big one. When Reagan was President, the Baby Boomers were a bunch of young healthy 40-somethings making money and paying taxes. Under Obama, those same boomers are now 68 and taking out taxes as Medicare and SS. Obama can’t do anything about that unless he singlehandedly repeals Medicare and Social Security.

I suspect that Republicans will try to repeal SS and Med, just not yet. They are waiting for the old boomers to die off first. give it 15 years. They will then pit the young hard working Millenials against elderly Gen X leeches. There aren’t enough Gen X votes to defeat a repeal.

Recessions come and go and the usual rule is the deeper the recession the stronger the recovery, but Obama has created a clear exception to the rule.

That rule hasn’t worked in a long time. The previous two recessions were also followed by weak and slow recoveries.

No, that is not what is occurring they have deliberately eliminated rural measuring sites which have no heat island problems and have eliminated numerous sites in Siberia all with the intention of creating warming where there is no warming. And when people start checking sites they find numerous examples of things going on which clearly give a false signal that the climate is warming.

Melting glaciers don’t lie, Dan.

…And these insane high pressures on the west coast don’t lie either.

We had a period of the most sunspot activity in thousands of years which allowed us to recover from a little Ice age which is natural warming not manmade warming and now we have this:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/24/uk-met-fastest-decline-solar-activity-last-ice-age/

http://www.mpg.de/495993/pressRelease20041028

Excerpt from link:

October 28, 2004

The activity of the Sun over the last 11,400 years, i.e., back to the end of the last ice age on Earth, has now for the first time been reconstructed quantitatively by an international group of researchers led by Sami K. Solanki from the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany). The scientists have analyzed the radioactive isotopes in trees that lived thousands of years ago. As the scientists from Germany, Finland, and Switzerland report in the current issue of the science journal “Nature” from October 28, one needs to go back over 8,000 years in order to find a time when the Sun was, on average, as active as in the last 60 years. Based on a statistical study of earlier periods of increased solar activity, the researchers predict that the current level of high solar activity will probably continue only for a few more decades.

http://www.eutimes.net/2011/09/cern-the-sun-causes-global-warming/

…And these insane high pressures on the west coast don’t lie either.

weather, just like the Midwest is going to be downright chilly for the 4th.

Going out on a limb here. But I’m predicting the Sierra’s get zero, zip, nada snow this year.

Then the NWS predictions will be seriously wrong this winter.

Then the National Weather Service’s predictions are seriously wrong, it predicts above normal precipitation in parts of southern California and normal precipitation for all the rest of California for December, January and February and other months show a similar pattern:

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/seasonal.php?lead=6

Based on the NWS predictions for the coming year for New Mexico, I am thinking of building an ark. (jk).

Slight change, it predicts “equal chance” for the rest of California which usually means normal precipitation.

Turn about is fair play, statistically they voted for the President that is screwing us.

Barack Obama claims deficit has decreased by two-thirds since taking office

By Katie Sanders on Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 at 10:57 p.m.

When President Barack Obama reflects on 2014, he brings up a litany of highlights that include drawing down the Afghanistan war and Americans signing up for health insurance thanks to his health care law.

Oh, and slicing up the deficit. Obama is super-pumped about that. He made a point to brag about the deficit’s drop in his 2015 State of the Union address.

“At every step, we were told our goals were misguided or too ambitious; that we would crush jobs and explode deficits,” Obama said. “Instead, we’ve seen the fastest economic growth in over a decade, our deficits cut by two-thirds, a stock market that has doubled, and health care inflation at its lowest rate in fifty years.”

We rate the claim Mostly True.

And the size of his best deficit is worse than any of the deficits Bush II ever had if you count the TARP loans as loans and not expenditures and since they were paid back with interest that is how they should be calculated.

And I acknowledged that so the site is only violating the spirit of our founding fathers not the actual law.

Greece = Detroit.

It has much better weather and a lower crime rate but besides that it works.

And as someone else (Combo?) said in recent days, Iceland is a much more interesting story.

Greece? Who cares. Decades of socialism followed by years of decrepitude and stalled nothingness.

FWIW, Iceland has 100% socialized, universal healthcare. It’s national and municipal income tax rate is flat and is 35.7%

Sounds pretty socialist to me.

“Greece = Detroit.

It has much better weather and a lower crime rate but besides that it works.”

I think Albuquerque would be a better comparison:

NYT: The rate of violent crime in Albuquerque is nearly double the national average. The homelessness rate, though harder to quantify, is similarly …

BESTPLACES: Albuquerque, NM, violent crime, on a scale from 1 (low crime) to 100, is 72. Violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, …

TIME: Nearly 20% of the population lives below the poverty line, and the crime rate is 53% higher than the national average. It really is like ‘Breaking Bad.’

Most metro areas have their bad areas, but in New Mexico, the entire city of Albuquerque is the bad area. And the cops are just as likely to murder you as the criminals.

That is what happens when a state and a city vote for liberals for decades. Only recently have Republicans been elected.

BTW, you are either channeling Rio or you are Rio. Only him/her thought by attacking Albuquerque it would get back at me for pointing out that Brazil was heading down the toilet. Rio could never understand that I thought the problem with Albuquerque and Brazil were the same, a leftist ideology.

It really is like ‘Breaking Bad.’

But thanks for referencing one of my all time favorite shows. By the way, you can’t get cell phone service in the spot Hank made his phone call in the episode To’ Hajiilee.

“Only recently have Republicans been elected.”

Is that when the cops started murdering poor people?

Obama stepped in “coincidentally” after the new Republican mayor started to crack down on illegals and the crime rate started to drop like a rock. The excessive force allegations started long before he became mayor. However, the vast majority of the killings seem to be very justified. Now, we have suspects trying to run down cops with their cars since the Obama justice department forced the department into an agreement making shooting at autos very difficult.

So it’s really Obama’s fault?! You need to lay off the meth for a while.

Sure thing…

http://www.benefitspro.com/2015/01/15/calpers-funding-levels-rise-to-77-percent

What you are showing is one pension fund for one year, what this shows is the unfunded liabilities for California have gone from 6.3 billion to 198 billion since 2003 some improvement:

http://calwatchdog.com/2015/06/09/campaign-2016-bipartisan-group-files-pension-reform-initiative/

Excerpt:

By engaging voters in the pension decision-making process, the group hopes to contain the state’s growing pension liability. Proponents of the “Voter Empowerment Act of 2016″ point to independent numbers which show the state’s pension liabilities have increased 3,000 percent in a decade. Last November, then-State Controller John Chiang (now state treasurer) pegged the state’s total unfunded pension liability from 130 public pension systems at $198 billion, a dramatic increase from just $6.3 billion in 2003.

duh, “if”

And “if” he rapes a nun, people will surely be disappointed.

So you think the tech and housing bubbles are going to go on forever?

I grew up next door in HB, used to ride our bikes to the bunkers through the farms or to the pier and watch the punkers get in fights with the long-hairs. Ahhhh….. a time before parking meters at the beach….

Just about anywhere in California including the farm belt like in Fresno, it was a golden era.

Around 1964, we drove from North Hollywood to Jungleland in Thousand Oaks and rode the elephants, watch the tigers and monkey shows. The 101 was a two lane highway back then. Citrus orchards were all over the place in So Ca. Remember those orange jaw breakers in a wood crate candies? Quintessential tourist trap stuff!

Leo, the MGM lion is buried under the T O Civic Center, and Mr Ed (the TV talking horse) retired at Jungleland. I grew up to work for the family that developed UCLA and the Conejo Valley (Thousand Oaks).

Don’t mess with me. Ca was totally a great place back then, I agree. The UC system was cheap and the middle class could access it almost free.