June 25, 2015

Bits Bucket for June 25, 2015

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed

210 Comments »

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 00:37:02

the New York Times

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 00:59:35

National Public Radio

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 01:06:48

MSNBC Television

Comment by Pangolin
2015-06-25 06:08:47

Reddit

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ibbots
2015-06-25 06:27:52

Monday Night Football

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 07:07:22

tv re-run invasion

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
Comment by Pangolin
2015-06-25 06:14:04

The old modes don’t work anyways. From the article:

why the hell would they respond with a slow-moving subpoena whose deadline was days away? By spending five minutes doing the laziest, George-Jetson-style online “research” (read: Google and site searches), they would have found publicly available info on some of the commenters. I’m talking things like websites and Google+ pages. One of the commenters had literally posted thousands of comments at Reason.com, from which it is clear that he (assuming it is a he) is not exactly a threat to anyone other than common decency

 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2015-06-25 06:15:38

.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-06-25 06:17:27

I haven’t heard from anyone. But these posters that talk about attacking mosques should take note. The feds are watching and you could end up on one of their “algorithms”.

Comment by Clubber Lang
2015-06-25 12:54:59

Paid for by the Sharia Protection Society of Amerika. I have read this blog since it’s inception and never once saw a poster talk about attacking mosques. Please post a link.

I find it curious that “atheist” “libertarians” are going out of their way to defend a political conquest ideology, while at the same time trashing Christianity. What gives?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 15:17:43

This blog post sponsored by William Kristol and Sheldon Adelson

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2015-06-25 15:56:01

well look at the wonderful things isis is doing, and where do they learn it from………..hmmmm it is a religious jihad

http://chicksontheright.com/blog/item/29550-horrible-look-what-isis-is-doing-to-children

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-06-25 16:39:10

Wow, ISIS are bad dudes! What a revelation. I was saying that on this blog back when the US was funding them and the Arizona senator was having his picture taken with them.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2015-06-25 01:03:47
Comment by Pangolin
2015-06-25 06:17:29

Shutting down to put up condos for the rich. Head on over to the Saddle Ranch or Barneys Beanery.

 
Comment by CHE
2015-06-25 15:29:15

I live in West Hollywood and run down the Sunset Strip everyday. Lots of mixed use/condo high rise going up even with lots of empty retail space already dotting the street.

Lots of businesses open and close within a few months.

You’ve also still got the massive red building at the Pacific Design Center still sitting mostly empty.

Yet they keep building more and more.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 05:07:32

Marketwatch dot com
Michael Sincere’s Long-Term Trader
Opinion: Jim Rogers does not like U.S. stocks one bit
By Michael Sincere
Published: June 25, 2015 6:01 a.m. ET
‘We’re overdue for another problem’
Bloomberg
Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings

I recently interviewed Jim Rogers, cofounder with George Soros of the Quantum Fund and author of the best-selling “Investment Biker,” which chronicled his investing-focused trek around the world by motorcycle. Since 2008 (when Rogers warned me that the stock market was going to crash), I have never heard him sound so ominous.

Sincere: What do you think of the U.S. stock market?

Rogers: This is the first time in recorded history that all the major world’s central banks are printing staggering amounts of money. Now the world has this huge artificial ocean of liquidity. The people getting the money are having a wonderful time. But when it ends, it will be very nasty.

‘The idea that the solution to too much debt is more debt is mind-boggling!’

In the United States, we have had economic slowdowns every four to seven years since the beginning of the Republic. It’s now been six or seven years since our last stock market problem. We’re overdue for another problem. The Fed might tell us we don’t have to worry and that a correction or crash will never happen again. That’s balderdash! When this artificial sea of liquidity ends, we’re going to pay a terrible price. When the next economic problem occurs, it will be much worse because the debt is so much higher.

What do you think could happen?

I believe the market will go down. When it’s down 9 or 13 percent, pick a number, people will be begging the Fed to save Western civilization. The Fed will come galloping to rescue on a white horse with a new program and a new name, but not QE. Janet Yellen will panic and try to print more money or something. The central banks will try and make people think everything is okay.

Will everything be okay?

It will not be okay. It will make things worse. They will try and save the system but they won’t be able to because few will have any debt capacity. The market will rally and perhaps then we’ll have a bubble. The U.S. is not in a bubble right now but it’s also not cheap. It will turn into a bubble when people are convinced there is no problem and the Fed will always save us.

Have you ever seen anything like this?

No, I have never seen anything like it. It has never happened in recorded history that all of the major central banks have printed unlimited amounts of money.

Comment by aNYCdj
2015-06-25 05:39:12

well guys what about putting some $$$ in an 3x reverse ETF fund…like faz

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 05:50:59

Jim Rogers is about to have his Chinese rug yanked out from under him.

I called the office of one of my congresscritters yesterday to test my theory about the TPP (he voted for the fast track part). The staffer was most anxious to read me a statement. It was, of course, the usual political blather about why the bill was a good thing, ending with a sentence that was something about create more jobs for Americans instead of having to compete with China.

Bingo! There it was, just as I had concluded. China.

So I probed a little further and ran my thesis by the staffer. His response? Big pause followed by “I can’t comment on that”.

Now, I don’t doubt that whatever happens, Rogers will probably be fine and I’m sure he’s already aware. But I think all those Mandarin lessons for his child just went down the drain. Learn Tagalog! Er, uh, Malaysian! Er, uh, Vietnamese! Er, uh, Spanish!

Comment by oxide
2015-06-25 06:46:06

What was your theory again? I lost track yesterday.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 07:23:30

As I understood his theory, it was that the trade agreement was to put a check on China. However, he believed it was more for security than economic reasons. Certainly, I believe it is attempt to do both.

However, I do not believe it will be successful, although it may slow the shift of power to China but it will ironically accelerate the decline of the U.S. Thus, Obama seems to be more concerned with the wellbeing of U.S. based multinationals than the country and its citizens. Their production will shift overseas to maintain their profits with the predictable results for U.S. workers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 07:46:06

Your first paragraph. That’s about it in a nutshell.

The state is concerned about security and global hegemony. Relations with China are not working out for them.

The TPP is a massive incentive package from the state to get the corporations on board.

As to your second paragraph, I have no position on the outcome.

However, I did have a lengthy discussion with a dear friend two days ago who has been looking to source products from China to sell online. Some of you may be aware of the various companies hawking “courses” about private labeling and selling on Amazon. He’s into it. We’ve had many a heated discussion about sourcing from the Chinese. I’m agin it, he’s for it. He finally saw the light when I went over this TPP thing with him and was able to identify sources he could work with other than Chinese, including one here in the US, and he’s off to the races.

Major corps know what’s going down and I’m sure have already made plans. You’ll be seeing more “Made In Vietnam”, “Made In India”, Made in the Philippines, Mexico, even Chile and Colombia. Not that there already aren’t plenty of things with these labels, but you’ll be seeing way more.

The poor schmucks who are mom and pop sellers on Amazon, for example, are going to get caught with their pants down and won’t be able to get delivery from China. And don’t be surprised if, like the confederate flag stuff, Amazon doesn’t allow products sourced from China. Not gonna happen today, but soon come, soon come.

JMO.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:17:31

And don’t be surprised if, like the confederate flag stuff, Amazon doesn’t allow products sourced from China. Not gonna happen today, but soon come, soon come.

Actually, do not be surprised if people turn to Alibaba and buy their confederate flags there.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:23:19

And Obama thought he had a chance of taking Putin down:

http://europe.newsweek.com/vladimir-putins-popularity-reaches-historic-high-among-russians-329277

What is interesting in this country if you ask people if the country is going in the right direction it is in the twenties that agree, in Russia it is more than 60% that feel that way.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 08:38:49

“Actually, do not be surprised if people turn to Alibaba and buy their confederate flags there.”

of course, but they’ve got that covered. Alibaba IPO took place on the NYSE, if I recall. And there have been a slew of complaints about fraud since.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-22/alibaba-s-banks-said-to-increase-ipo-size-to-record-25-billion

“Alibaba’s underwriters earned $300 million in fees, taking home 1.2 percent of the proceeds, according to a filing today. Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley each earned 15.7 percent of the fees, while Citigroup Inc.’s share represented 7.9 percent, the filing shows. Alibaba’s 28 other underwriters received 1 percent or less apiece.”

I expect Goldman, JPM and Morgan Stanley to come up roses. Deutsche Bank, however, not so much. The other 28, under the bus.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 09:01:57

Actually, Alibaba said it would not but at least one of its platforms still does have them, however Alibaba is not China’s only online retailer so I do not think they will be hard to find. Given the rebel streak they will probably be bought in greater volumes.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 09:37:40

More like Eastern Europe pivots to China, but who’s arguing?

I think Israel is pivoting to China as well.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 10:02:39

“China pivots to Eastern Europe”

But that’s Putin’s turf!

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 10:31:48

So, a few words to the poor schmucks who will be the last to know. Hopefully this goes down rather quietly, with the corps just shifting their manufacturing operations elsewhere without saying why, other than it’s a business decision. I’m pretty sure that’s being done already.

However, if you’re one of those moms and pops sourcing from China and selling online, you may want to review your sourcing. Again, you probably have some time before TSHTF, and again, I could be all wet on this. But as my grandmother used to say, safety first!

And speaking of safety first, if you’re some middle manager, supervisor or engineer or programmer or whatever whose company sends you to China for short or extended stays, watch your back and make the appropriate preparations. First of all, YOUR supervisor will never, EVER tell you any of this, especially if they want it to look like business as usual. And, they may be trying to squeeze the last drop out of the China trade while they can. Then again, even they may not have been made aware. But YOU, at this time, are nothing more than window dressing.

You may want to do what you can to avoid future trips to China, even if it means quitting your job. All it takes is one stupid incident like another major hack or a confrontation in the South China Sea or even some false flag using a Chinese national in the US, and all of a sudden YOU are behind enemy lines with no hope of assistance from your company, or country, for that matter. Trust me on this. You will be left to rot, the management and shareholders and bankers and politicians will be safe in their stateside offices and homes with granite countertops.

Pay careful attention to what is, even now, coming from the State Department. It’s no longer against the law to negotiate with foreign entities in hostage situations. Your family will have NO help if you get caught up in an international incident, but they’re welcome to scrape together some funds and try to get you out. And your congresscritter just deballed him or herself in this, so calls to their office will be worthless. All your family will get are sympathetic murmurs.

Am I way over the top on this? Maybe. I hope so, I really do. But what I’ve seen go down every since the Bush regime makes me realize that anything can happen, and anyone can be used in this ugly game, even some poor schmuck off the streets with a drug problem.

 
Comment by cactus
2015-06-25 12:14:33

And don’t be surprised if, like the confederate flag stuff, Amazon doesn’t allow products sourced from China.”

Its a free trade bill right ? what am I missing here ??

 
Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 12:49:23

Everything that our congresscritters have been sworn to secrecy about.

 
Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 12:54:23

And this thing makes The Affordable Care Act look positively transparent!

 
Comment by jane
2015-06-25 20:35:57

Let us please remember our hard earned lessons about fedgov newspeak. “Tax Reform” = “Higher Taxes”.

“Affordable Care Act” = “Backbreaking Health Care Costs”.

“Free Trade Bill” = “You won’t know until you read it how we skrood-ya over, ha-ha!”.

Beware of tools with progressive-sounding names, with which we citizens are effed over. Note how the fedgov drones get all sentimental when they smell another avenue through which to expropriate citizens’ property and freedoms of choice (such as they are).

The unspoken rationale: since they are so much more enlightened, they will do a more better job in re-allocating our cash.

About the freedoms - that’s just a power trip. They erode them because they can, like Ted Bundys going through the training course, decapitating pets and pulling wings off flies.

I hope to see the fedgov salary entitlements for its bloated FSA halved in my lifetime.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Pangolin
2015-06-25 06:20:50

This part makes no sense:

They will try and save the system but they won’t be able to because few will have any debt capacity. The market will rally and perhaps then we’ll have a bubble. The U.S. is not in a bubble right now but it’s also not cheap. It will turn into a bubble when people are convinced there is no problem and the Fed will always save us.

He gives absolutely no reason why this can’t go on forever. We have unlimited debt capacity.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 06:41:25

“I believe the market will go down. When it’s down 9 or 13 percent, pick a number”

That’s not much of a crash.

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 07:52:17

I’d buy that dip.

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2015-06-25 08:33:29

“In the United States, we have had economic slowdowns every four to seven years since the beginning of the Republic.”

Um….Mr. Rogers let me point out to you that we no longer have a Republic.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 09:03:32

Only Banana Republic.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 16:11:28

Idiocracy. Brought to you by the Obama Zombies, McCain Mutants, and Romney Retards.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Little Al
2015-06-25 16:42:09

The honorable Governor Jerry Brown has already promised 3 billion more to teachers next year. LAPD is hiring 1300 cops. The California economy is crashing and burning in no way, shape or form.
We all know it’s all funny money. Global warming is causing serious fires throughout the state and the real fire season hasn’t started yet.
We should all be aware that America and the rest of the world is in serious decline due to peak oil and environmental devastation. But the politicians say not a word that’s meaningful on the subject.
Republican are just grumpy old white men and their consorts, and Democrats are trying to rally another race war in the least racist nation that has ever existed. Oh yeah, and Al Gore flies around in his jet, and lives in his mansion and tells us to conserve.
Better yet, most Americans find little wrong with what they see cuz the tater tots haven’t run out at Miccy D’s yet.
The Anazasi tribe saw nothing wrong with cutting down all the junipers in Arizona and Utah until one day they woke up and ate each other.
The modern Americans are no more intelligent than that.
If you want to talk about housing, we need to build much smaller units next to transportation hubs, and let the rest of America rot. A politician who would support a vision like that would garner my respect. Guess what, there’s not one in America. They’re too busy raping and pillaging what’s left and rightly so.
Maybe, theyre smart enough to be buying guns and islands to ward off the zombies when the shit really does hit the fan, and nobody knows when that will happen, but I’ll bet my bottom dollar it will be in less than 70 years.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 17:06:26

Democrats are trying to rally another race war in the least racist nation that has ever existed

When was the last race war?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 17:13:20

If you want to talk about housing, we need to build much smaller units next to transportation hubs, and let the rest of America rot.

There are politicians who support building housing near light rail stations and whatnot, It’s should be completely understandable to you that there are none who would go along with the idea of allowing the vast majority of the country to rot.

 
Comment by Little Al
2015-06-25 17:40:25

I should clarify that they should rot if they were not willing to submit to housing that would not be up to American standards and fuel consumption at present. I don’t expect my views to be popular because most Americans and people of the world are narcissistic and therefore only concerned about personal happiness. Most women own lots of unnecessary dresses and men have boats, fancy cars, and oversized houses all for the purpose of getting laid. Can you actually expect such ignorant fools to make rational decisions that will benefit future generations. If you have ignorant yahoos who can’t comprehend the simple notion that a finite planet does not have an infinite supply of oil, and using our air supply as a sewer of toxicity cannot end well. As well as wiping out major animal species at an alarming rate. Modern man is doing a horrible job of policing himself. Drastic measures would have to be taken to ensure the existence of civilized man in the future, and it would have to be made by a world government that does not exist.
I have absolutely no faith that man is smart enough to bring this into effect on his own. The majority will never leave the safe and comfortable shore of short-sightedness, complacency, and stupidity.
For example, 7 billion people on the planet is unsustainable. A third grader should have no difficulty understanding the math on that one. Thus, people have the intelligence to see the truth and do nothing about it.
Obviously Jeb and Hillary would be unelectable on this platform, and true world cooperation is highly improbable so why am I so passionate about an impossible dream?

 
 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2015-06-25 09:07:55

I heard someone make the same argument…that we have a recession every x years, they they produced a long list of dates that were generally approximately x years apart.

Notable exceptions were the expansions following major events (Great Depression was a big one).

In other words, expansions are generally x years long, except for the few times that they were shorter, and few times that they were longer.

This is consistent with Dalio’s view of how credit cycles work in his “Economic Machine” video. If we are part of a recovery following one of his long-term debt cycles, it may just be true that we are in for a longer expansion than “typical” this time around.

I’m clearly not saying that it goes on forever, but I think Rogers is right when he says “The U.S. is not in a bubble right now but it’s also not cheap. It will turn into a bubble when people are convinced there is no problem and the Fed will always save us.”

Complacency isn’t yet rampant enough for a bubble.

Comment by Housing Analyst
2015-06-25 09:29:57

Another DingBat Story from Rental_Fraud.

The reality is prices are massively inflated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 05:11:23

Showdown at the EU Corral…

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 05:12:30

Market Pulse
Greece’s lenders set deadline, threaten ‘take it or leave it’ choice: FT
By MarketWatch
Published: June 25, 2015 7:05 a.m. ET
A previous version of this story misstated a U.S. time conversion.

Greece’s creditors gave the country’s leader, Alexis Tsipras, until 11 a.m. Brussels time, or 5 a.m. Eastern Time, to deliver an acceptable plan, the Financial Times reported Thursday. If a deal is not done by then, the lenders’ own proposal will be presented to the Eurogroup of eurozone finance ministers as a “take it or leave it” choice for Greece, the FT reported, citing two senior eurozone officials. “The level of frustration is so high. I don’t see a deal,” one official said, the FT reported. An hour after the 11 a.m. deadline, it was still uncertain whether the Greek premier had submitted a new plan for economic overhauls. However, Tsipras’s meeting with leaders of the lender institutions broke up around noon Brussels time, with market participants waiting to hear the outcome of the talks. Austria’s finance minister, Hans Jörg Schelling, said the Eurogroup will look at new proposals on Greece, hoping to reach a compromise before 4 p.m. Brussels time, or 10 a.m. Eastern, according to media reports. That would be just in time for the EU summit of European leaders that kicks off in the late afternoon. Schelling stated that Sunday is the final deadline to reach an agreement on Greece’s bailout.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 05:16:55

“Far apart”

Frequently-used description of the two sides in the bailout negotiations…

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 05:19:38

Eurozone crisis
Greece bailout talks resume in bid for last-minute deal
EU officials insist agreement is still possible as negotiations start ahead of the eurozone finance ministers meeting in Brussels
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras leaves the European commission HQ without agreement.
Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras leaves the European commission HQ without agreement. Photograph: Yves Herman/Reuters
Jennifer Rankin and Ian Traynor in Brussels
Thursday 25 June 2015 07.38 EDT
Last modified on Thursday 25 June 2015 08.12 EDT

Crisis talks between Greece and its creditors are underway in a desperate search for a deal to prevent Greece from collapsing into bankruptcy.

Eurozone finance ministers have gathered in Brussels for an emergency meeting –their fourth in eight days – ahead of a long-planned summit of all 28 EU leaders.

Hopes of a breakthrough were falling as the ministers meeting began. Germany’s finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, said Greece had moved backwards. The chair of the Eurogroup, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, said ministers would be waiting to hear ideas from the Greeks.

EU officials are insisting a deal is still in reach, although Athens has not signed up to the latest proposal from creditors.

The Greek prime minister, Alexis Tsipras, spent more than three hours in a meeting with the leaders of the International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank and European commission on Thursday morning, but left without an agreement.

Rumours were swirling that Greece’s creditors were going to present Athens with an ultimatum to accept their austerity plan in exchange for releasing €7.2bn (£5.1bn) in desperately needed bailout funds.
Live Greek crisis: No deal despite creditors’ ultimatum - live updates
Read more

But one EU diplomat said there was no take-it-or-leave-it deal and institutions remained available for further discussion.

The two sides still appear to be far apart, however. Greece’s creditors want the Tsipras government to make deeper spending cuts, as well as faster and more sweeping reforms to the Greek pension system, according to a leaked version of the creditors’ counter-proposals that is very similar to an earlier version rejected by the Greeks on Wednesday.

Arriving for the talks, Austria’s finance minister, Hans Jörg Schelling, said that Sunday was the final deadline to reach an agreement with Greece, although he hoped to get a deal done on Thursday afternoon ahead of the EU leaders’ summit.

“Where there is a will, there is a way,” tweeted Pierre Moscovici, European commissioner for economic affairs.

Eurozone ministers had been expected to work through Wednesday night to resolve the impasse over the Greek bailout, but the meeting broke up after little more than an hour, when it became clear both sides remained far apart on how to fix the Greek economy.

Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 05:32:41

German taxpayers are already the ones who will foot the bill when Greece defaults - the German banks were bailed out by the “loans” to Greece, which were really just bailouts of the German banks by the German government. All that’s going on now is a tap dance by Angela Merkel to make it look like it’s the Greek’s fault, and not hers for paying off the banks first.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:09:39

All estimates I have seen show that Greek workers will take a 50% pay reduction if they leave the EU. So I think they “will foot the bill” too. Moreover, they know it and over 60% want to stay in the EU. However, there is no option that allows them to stay in the union and not pay their debts to the EU and IMF. So what always happens when a country runs out of OPM will happen, the working class will get hosed.

 
Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 08:56:10

“So what always happens when a country runs out of OPM will happen, the working class will get hosed.”

The working class is already getting hosed. All that money German banks gave to Greece’s oligarchs somehow never managed to trickle down to the rest of Greece, just the bill.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:16:11

All estimates I have seen show that Greek workers will take a 50% pay reduction if they leave the EU.

I haven’t seen anything anywhere about Greece leaving the EU. It’s all been about leaving the euro, which is not the same thing.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 10:41:51

I haven’t seen anything anywhere about Greece leaving the EU. It’s all been about leaving the euro, which is not the same thing.

No, but I have read it is going to be both. Think about it Greece is going to stiff the EU banks and still be allowed to stay in the EU, I do not think so.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 10:48:50

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government-debt_crisis

This article expects them to leave due to not being able to pay back the loans, of course I do not think they will even try.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 10:53:53

Key excerpt and proof that the election of the leftists with their pie in the sky promises has just made things worse and addressing the EU issue:

The prolonged time-span without any active bailout-agreement, caused an increasingly growing liquidity crisis, which resulted in a new fourth recession hitting Greece - starting from Q4-2014.[17][18] According to the European economic forecast published in May 2015, the impact of this sudden unexpected recession for the entire part of 2015, would be that economic growth (real GDP) now only was expected to rise +0.5% compared to the earlier forecast +2.5%; while it was emphasized this attainment of low positive growth for the current year as a whole - was even a best case scenario forecast - at the premise on a fast successful conclusion to the current bailout-programme negotiations held between the Greek government and its public creditors in May 2015. The reason why the economic outlook became downgraded, was because the “positive momentum” building up in 2014 after Greece’s savage recession came to an end, had been hurt by the political uncertainty erupting since the announcement in December of early elections, which further intensified after the election - due to the inability of the new-elect government to settle an economic policy agreement with its creditors within its first given deadline in February 2015.[95] The Hellenic Confederation of Commerce and Enterprises (ECEE) estimated, that each day without an active bailout agreement under the new-elect government, had entailed daily costs equal to €22.3 million shrinkage of GDP, bankrupt closure of 59 shops, along with 613 jobs being lost.[96] The political uncertainty, beside of damaging the economic growth, was found also to have caused a “significant shortfall” in collected state revenues beyond what could be explained by the lower growth, which led to a significant downgrade of the forecast Greek general government’s structural budget balance in 2015 (declining from a previously forecast +1.6%, now to become negative at -1.4%).[97] Finally, as a result of all these adverse developments, the debt-to-GDP ratio was also forecast to deteriorate, going up from the forecast six months ago of 170.2% in 2015 and 159.2% in 2016, now to be 180.2% in 2015 and 173.5% in 2016, making it increasingly unlikely for Greece to attain its bailout programme target of reaching a 124% ratio in 2020.[98]

Faced by the threat of sovereign default, which inevitably would entail enforcement of recessionary capital controls to avoid a collapse of the banking sector - and potentially could lead to exit from the eurozone due to growing liquidity constraints making continued payment of public pension and salaries impossible in euro,[24][25] some final attempts for reaching a renegotiated bailout agreement were made by the Greek government in June 2015.[22][23][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] Expectations are that Greece, beside of ultimately receiving its remaining transfer of frozen bailout funds in its second programme, in addition will need a follow-up support programme starting 1 July 2015. The Troika announced their premise to offer Greece (and begin negotiations about) establishment of a follow-up third bailout programme, would be a prior successful completion of the re-negotiated current second bailout programme.[62][63]

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 11:19:35

Where’s the section about leaving the EU?

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 15:39:47

Here this states it explicitly not implicitly and it is referencing the Greek central bank’s view:

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2015-06-17/greece-leaving-euro-would-be-catastrophe-for-europe/

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 10:16:00

Thursday
Jun. 25′th 2015
Greek talks postponed to Saturday
Deadlock until Saturday? Greece’s debt talks will reconvene at the weekend. (Photo: Consillium)
By Benjamin Fox
BRUSSELS, Today, 18:47

Eurozone finance ministers will meet for the fifth time in 10 days on Saturday (27 June) after the latest talks aimed at sealing a Greek debt deal were hastily aborted on Thursday.

It was the second false start in as many days, despite a morning of feverish negotiations between Greece and its creditors in the European Commission’s Berlaymont headquarters.

“The institutions informed us that on a number of issues there is still a wide gap with the Greek authorities,” Dutch finance minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who chairs the Eurogroup, told reporters.

Greece’s creditors - the European Commission, European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) - will now be tasked with assessing the latest offer from the Greek government, which was tabled just moments before the start of the meeting.

“In the meantime, the door is still open for the Greek authorities to accept the proposals tabled by the institutions”, he added.

At the heart of the disagreement remains the balance of tax increases and spending cuts needed to raise an extra €8 billion in 2015 and 2016, with the two sides divided on the scale of changes to pension contributions and new taxes on businesses and corporations.

Meanwhile, Greek sources indicated the creditors’ proposal - that Greece should find €400 million in new cuts on defence spending - would be particularly tough for Syriza’s coalition partners, the right-wing Independent Greeks party, to accept.

Speaking earlier at the pre-summit meeting of her centre-right EPP group, German chancellor Angela Merkel stated that an agreement would have to be reached over the weekend. Germany “would not be blackmailed,” she added.

For their part, Greek ministers sounded a more optimistic note.

“The institutions are going to look again at the two documents - our documents and their own. There will be discussions with the Greek government, and we’ll continue until we find a solution,” finance minister Yannis Varoufakis told reporters.

“European history is full of disagreements, negotiations, and then compromises,” said Greek prime minister Alexis Tsipras as he arrived at the EU summit.

A variety of contingency plans are now being hastily being drawn up to avoid Greece running out of money next week.

Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 13:10:49

Kickin’-the-can, kicking the can . . .

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 16:13:24

The instant Greece defaults, the wheels on the ECB Ponzi markets will come off and a cascading chain-reation derivatives meltdown will begin. For that reason the Greek can will be kicked into perpetuity.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 16:38:04

And now we return to our Kabuki Theatre Marathon . . .

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 16:42:02

The instant Greece defaults, the wheels on the ECB Ponzi markets will come off and a cascading chain-reation derivatives meltdown will begin. For that reason the Greek can will be kicked into perpetuity.

Yeah, that does sound pretty scary. It’s a good thing that they keep kicking that can.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-06-25 05:18:20

Say it ain’t so …

“Science, Now Under Scrutiny Itself”

The New York Times, June 15, 2015

“Still, the pressure to publish attention-grabbing findings is stronger than ever, these experts said — and so is the ability to “borrow” and digitally massage data.”

(snip)

“The most common reason for retraction because of misconduct is image manipulation, usually of figures or diagrams, a form of deliberate data massaging or, in some cases, straight plagiarism.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/science/retractions-coming-out-from-under-science-rug.html

And from across The Pond …

“Posted on May 27, 2015 by Steven Hayward in Science”

“Behind Science Fraud, Chapter 4″

“’A lot of what is published is incorrect.’ I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not to take photographs of slides. Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted . . . this symposium—on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London last week—touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. . .

“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations. Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication. . . nobody is ready to take the first step to clean up the system.”

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/05/behind-science-fraud-chapter-4.php

Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 05:36:18

The “science” of climate change denying researchers, funded by fossil fuel industries and the Koch Brothers, probably accounts for a lot of this.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-06-25 06:35:01

First assume that anyone who does not agree with what you think is evil, stupid, paid off or all three.

Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 06:43:20

Second assume that the scientists of the world are bent on world domination.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 16:14:30

She blinded me with science….

 
 
 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 05:39:34

If it’s in the New York Times it has to be true

Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 06:18:18

“Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted”

No denying that.

Gruber frequently visited White House

By Justin Sink - 11/18/14 09:55 AM EST

The ObamaCare consultant drawing fire for mocking the “stupidity of the American voter” visited the White House on nearly two dozen occasions and met with President Obama in the West Wing, according to a review of visitor logs.

MIT professor Jonathan Gruber held a series of high-level meetings with administration officials beginning in 2009 and extending through June of this year.

thehill.com/policy/healthcare/224490-gruber-frequently-visited-white-house - 142k -

“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to get the thing to pass,” Gruber said at the November 2013 event.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/12/in-third-video-obamacare-architect-talks-about-basic-exploitation-of-american-voters-video/#ixzz3e4ufiu3x

“Until a second Massachusetts hero arose, John Kerry. John Kerry said no, no we’re not going to tax your heath insurance, we’re going to tax those evil insurance companies. We’re going to impose a tax that if they sell health insurance that’s too expensive, we’re going to tax them. And conveniently the tax rate will happen to be the marginal tax rate on the income tax code. So basically it’s the same thing: we just tax insurance companies, they pass on higher prices that offsets the tax break we get into being the same thing. It’s a very clever basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”

#GruberGate Compilation “Stupid Is As Stupid DOES” - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_bBaXPVQns - 188k -

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 06:27:41

Salon dot com has an article titled: The Confederate flag is not enough: Why our new race debate misses the point

With a subtitle under that that reads:

You can kill a symbol, but it’s not easy to extinguish an idea — or the gun politics that help enforce it

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 06:42:33

On the Washington Post website, a link titled: PBS suspends ‘Finding Your Roots’ after review of Ben Affleck’s influence

With a subtitle under that that reads: The actor, who had volunteered to be featured on the genealogy program, asked show producers to leave out information about his slave-owning ancestor

Libtards gonna tard, LOLZ

 
Comment by oxide
2015-06-25 11:33:55

I was chatting with a friend about the Affleck incident. My friend’s first thought was that Affleck was trying to protect his school-age children. If Affleck’s roots were publicized, his children could be harassed at school.

That put PBS in a bad spot. If they revealed the info, they would be accused of exposing the Affleck kids. If they held the info back, they would be accused of a cover-up.

I dunno, what would be the best course of action? Reveal the info and then keep an eagle eye on the kids to make sure they’re cool at school, I guess.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2015-06-25 07:05:22

Publish or perish, and it applies to grad students just as much as it does to tenure-track professors.

“Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data.”

Yo, that’s not alarming behavior. That’s what you’re supposed to do. Modify your hypothesis to fit the data, make another prediction based on the new hypothesis, conduct an experiment and collect data to confirm or deny the prediction, refine hypothesis again. This is standard issue scientific method, and guess what, it takes time and money.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 07:55:27

But Oxide that is the problem with what is going on. What you described is exactly how science should work but is not working like that with the AGW theory. In the beginning, the scientists looked at how much the Earth had warmed and how much co2 in ppm concentrations in the atmosphere had increased and extrapolated the same amount of warming per ppm forward. However, these models have proven widely inaccurate. But instead of admitting that their estimates of man’s role in the past warming were wrong and they overestimated the climates sensitivity to co2. They began to hide data, manipulate data and fabricate data. They liked the religion behind AGW too much to conduct proper science. They are no different that the 99% of “scientists” that were perfectly willing to ‘explain” that the Catholic church was correct and the Sun revolved around the Earth. Just like the AGW scientists are constantly explaining why the data does not match up with the predictions, the previous scientists were constantly explaining why the Sun was not in its predicted path.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:41:13

Here is something I find interesting about that history particularly in light of people on this board suggesting that the early protestants were more “modern” than the Catholics and the fundamentalists of today are totally different. Once again that is just liberals projecting their present beliefs backward. While the Protestants’ belief that everyone should read the bible eventually paid dividends in literacy, the original protestants were much more fundamental on issues such as pre-marital sex, extra-marital sex, homosexuality, drinking and gambling. Today’s liberals would call them rubes. Their puritan lifestyle actually allowed them to accumulate more capital and it dovetailed nicely with capitalism. However, that was all in the future, this shows that many Catholic church leaders were actually promoting science when Martin Luther was dismissive of change:

The first information about the heliocentric views of Nicolaus Copernicus was circulated in manuscript. Although only in manuscript, Copernicus’ ideas were well known among astronomers and others. His ideas contradicted the then-prevailing understanding of the Bible. In the King James Bible First Chronicles 16:30 state that “the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved.” Psalm 104:5 says, “[the Lord] Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.” Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that “The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.”

Nonetheless, in 1533, Johann Albrecht Widmannstetter delivered in Rome a series of lectures outlining Copernicus’ theory. The lectures were heard with interest by Pope Clement VII and several Catholic cardinals.[59] On November 1, 1536, Archbishop of Capua Nikolaus von Schönberg wrote a letter to Copernicus from Rome encouraging him to publish a full version of his theory.

However, in 1539, Martin Luther said:

“There is talk of a new astrologer who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the earth and the trees walked and moved. But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he must . . . invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down. However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand still and not the earth.”[60]

This was reported in the context of a conversation at the dinner table and not a formal statement of faith. Melanchthon, however, opposed the doctrine over a period of years.[61][62]

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 09:05:46

From Wikipedia sorry.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2015-06-25 11:22:37

Just a quick memo for you Dan, the world does not revolve around you and your fossil paymasters.

The symposium on dodgy science was about biomedical research. And the rush to publish is prevalent in ALL fields of science, even in basic research. I read somewhere that some types of research have lost upwards of 90% of their

One friend told me that some of the best research was done in the Soviet Union, where the scientists had the luxury of devoting their time to science instead of fundraising. The resulting papers were infrequent, but rock-solid.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 05:35:05

Romney’s Revenge!

Gotta love it. He’s the one who sparked the FFF (Flag Feeding Frenzy) by “ordering” South Carolina to “take that flag down”. I remember thinking that it was sort of a WTF moment, but I realize he just paid the Republican Party back big time for using him as a place-holder for JEB! and scuttling his campaign. And EVERYONE fell into line, not just the politicians, but Amazon and Ebay and WalMart, etc.

Mitty must be in 7th heaven right about now. He just showed the Reboobican Party who’s boss.

Jim Webb wrote on Facebook: that the flag “has wrongly been used for racist and other purposes in recent decades. It should not be used in any way as a political symbol that divides us…”

“Honorable Americans fought on both sides in the Civil War, including slave holders in the Union Army,” and “many non-slave holders fought for the South,” he wrote. “This is a time for us to come together, and to recognize once more that our complex multicultural society is founded on the principle of mutual respect.”

I gotta admit, the writer Streiff at Red State put the whole thing in perspective. Take down the American Flag and erase it from history:

“We’ve managed to piss off a not insubstantial number of people who reject the South = racism meme that we are pushing with this… In short we are doing the Democrats’ work for them. If you think this will stop here you are fooling yourself. The United States flag flew over Constitutionally instituted slavery from ratification on June 21, 1788 until 1865. If you want a symbol of slavery, then the US flag is a much better one.”

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 05:41:39

We need some kind of new national holiday

Maybe call it White America Must Apologize Day™

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 06:28:26

I just want people to remember who lobbed the Molotov cocktail into that pile of dry tinder.

Romney. He just exacted his revenge and killed three birds with one stone: The Reboobican party, JEB! (who now doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of being president) and all that po’ white trash who refused to recognize Mitty’s superiority and vote for him.

Meanwhile, JEB!, not to be outdone, is calling for the resignation of Katherine Archuleta, the tubbalard who is the Director of the OPM for the fedgov. Not that she shouldn’t resign, the lady is completely clueless about what the duties of her position are and she doesn’t have the faintest sense of responsibility for that massive data breach. In fact she stated to Congress that it was the perpetrators who were to blame and it is the responsibility of “all of us”. Seriously, you can’t make this stuff up.

However, since Archuleta is a wise latina, it sort of looks like JEB! is saying he’ll be the one to tell the Mexican ladies what they can and can’t do.

Anyway, the Reboobican hopefuls and has-beens are issuing orders.

Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 07:17:35

Didn’t Romney win the entire Deep South anyway?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 07:50:14

Romney won the Deep Six from the Republican consultancy.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 08:49:57

Also remember that there’s plenty of po’ white trash in other parts of the country besides the Deep South. Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Maine, Wisconsin, etc.

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:56:35

Vermont?
Having grown up there and loving the Redneck Manifesto, I agree.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 09:07:58

Lived there myself. Saw it first hand. They even had some Stars and Bars up there, being used for curtains in windows. Although I think it had more to do with Easy Rider than the Confederacy.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:20:32

The Republican governor of South Carolina and the two GOP senators have endorsed removing the flag from the state capitol. I don’t think that it was a tweet from Mitt Romney that convinces them to do that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 10:56:43

He didn’t “convince” them. He ordered them.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 11:23:13

I read somewhere that it’s going to take a 2/3 vote of the state legislature to remove that flag. Will Romney order the legislators to do his bidding?

 
 
Comment by Neuromance
2015-06-25 16:28:12

In fact she stated to Congress that it was the perpetrators who were to blame and it is the responsibility of “all of us”.

When all of us are responsible, none of us are responsible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 10:10:27

Maybe call it White America Must Apologize Day™

or Hand Over Your Money and Women and Leave Day™

Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 19:27:26

They’re coming for our women!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2015-06-25 05:46:47

palmy the real reason we had slavery is because us stupid white people had more money then brains…..and we paid top dollar to those African tribal leaders for them……sounds familiar with multiple bids on houses.

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 06:06:37

Well, being from shanty Irish stock, no one in my ancestry ever had slaves, that’s for sure. In fact, my ancestors were too busy trying to lift the boot of the Brits from their faces, or at least avoid scrutiny. Sad that my great grandmother was unsuccessful along this line and had her back permanently disfigured for teaching children.

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 06:18:50

“no one in my ancestry ever had slaves”

That doesn’t matter, you still owe reparations

Whitey gonna PAY

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 06:31:37

I gave at the office. Seriously, I did. fedgov took a nice chunk every week and later on, every two weeks.

 
Comment by ibbots
2015-06-25 06:33:58

Here’s a video of a white teenager, holding an infant, getting attacked by a black teenager.

Http://i.imgur.com/trMokRf.png

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=86b_1435196070

I’m pretty sure if the Confederate flag is the cause of this.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 07:34:06

The fat lady is singing ‘Dixie’…

The confederate flag will now be removed from toy cars based on the Dukes of Hazard tv series. Walmart will no longer sell items displaying the flag. And NASCAR wants it removed from state grounds. NASCAR.

This is a redneck cultural crisis.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 07:48:28

Go all the way, baybeeeeeeeeeee! Yee-haw!

“The United States flag flew over Constitutionally instituted slavery from ratification on June 21, 1788 until 1865. If you want a symbol of slavery, then the US flag is a much better one.”

Take that flag down!

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 07:50:56

I’m pretty sure if the Confederate flag is the cause of this.

Why would you think that?

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 08:12:55

Interesting quote from an Ann Coulter piece. Really gave me pause, because this has actually happened to me, twice in my life, way long ago when I wuz a pup. And, I might add, with the complicity of one of my “liberal” family members. From the Northeast. Frankly, I had forgotten about these incidents. One was an actual beating, one was more of an alcohol fueled pawing. One of my more conservative family members caught wind and put an end to circumstances that might bring about future incidents. HUGE family ruckus, it all came floating back when I read this.

My first reaction was “Well, I never…” then, “Oops, uh-oh, wait, dang…

But it sort of proves the point about the real conflict being between two groups of white folks who hate each other’s guts, and one group uses people of color at their shock troops against the other. Right within my own family group, too.

“Ask around. You might be surprised at how many whites you know have been physically attacked by a black person at least once in their lives.”

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 08:26:55

Interesting theory. Was every racist once beaten up by a black person?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-06-25 08:43:08

Nevermind slavery, the Confederate flag represents sedition. It actually amazes me that it is allowed to fly at all.

 
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 08:43:09

Ooh, ooh, I wanna play, too. Here goes:

This blog post sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 08:53:01

“Nevermind slavery, the Confederate flag represents sedition”

ding ding ding we have a winner

 
Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 08:54:42

Or it symbolizes being a rebel and Americans love rebels with or without a cause.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:25:38

“Ask around. You might be surprised at how many whites you know have been physically attacked by a black person at least once in their lives.”

Was that Ann Coulter’s interesting point? What’s so interesting about it? If you ask white people whether they’ve been attacked or robbed by another white person, you’d probably get more affirmative answers.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:27:09

Nevermind slavery, the Confederate flag represents sedition.

It also represents big government and opposition to a free market economy.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 20:00:26

“What’s so interesting about it?”

It’s interesting how stupid it is. And how revealing.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 08:02:48

I don’t think Romney was a factor. The South ignored him. It was Big Bizness that got their attention and got called to heel. Same thing happened with the “religious freedom” laws in Indy and Ark., they caved as soon as Big Bizness told them to. Welcome to the oligarchy.

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 08:26:39

Well, dang, Romney is nothing if not Big Bidness. And he was the one who yelled “Fire” in the crowded theater. And then clammed up pretty fast, haven’t heard a peep since.

So we’re not really in disagreement here. I’d be willing to bet he’s been on the blower with Nikki Haley from the get-go, issuing orders to her.

I still wonder who is going to win the match-up, Romney or Jeb. When Romney lost the election, it was Jeb1, Mitt 0. Then when Romney tried for another go and Jeb had a little talk with him, Jeb 2, Mitt 0.

But this time, Jeb 2, Mitt 1. Not over yet.

Will he jump back in the race with Nikki as Veep? Film at 11.

Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:29:26

Nikki Haley might listen to Romney if he promised to make a big contribution to her next campaign. Otherwise, why would she listen to some former Yankee governor?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 10:58:20

I dunno why. But she did.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 16:17:00

I liked Jim Webb before, but his principled comment on the Stars and Bars puts him right up there with Rand Paul as the only 2016 candidate worth considering.

 
 
Comment by azdude
2015-06-25 05:55:38

I gave my broker a nice bonus this year.

Comment by Blue Skye
2015-06-25 06:36:35

I think you mean you serviced your banker.

 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 06:32:58

A public service announcement from the Social Justice Warriors™

http://jezebel.com/you-dont-have-daddy-issues-but-your-piece-of-shit-fathe-1712656531

 
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 07:04:24

California taxpayers, time to open your wallets and pay for these Acts Of Love™

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-06-25/california-to-foot-bill-for-health-care-of-undocumented-children

And if you don’t want to give more free sh*t to the Free Sh*t Army, you are a racist

Forward

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 08:18:31

Yeah, at least the undocumented kids will get inoculated. I’m more worried about the Americans who refuse to have their kids vaccinated. So, when the next epidemic comes, don’t blame the Mexicans and the Hondurans.

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 08:28:23

This blog post sponsored by the National Council of La Raza

Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 08:35:06

“This blog post sponsored by the National Council of La Raza”

That s gold, Jerry Gold - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm51Nx_MaDU - 166k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 08:37:34

It’s OK Media Analyst. No need to be a Hispanophobic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 08:29:07

“This blog post sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center”

 
Comment by In Colorado
2015-06-25 08:46:04

Yeah, at least the undocumented kids will get inoculated.

FWIW, they were probably already inoculated in Mexico, which has a higher vaccination rate than the USA.

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 09:01:46

Your antibodies just ate my talking point…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 12:52:15

“There are countries in Africa where they have higher vaccination rates than here in the United States.”

Katty Kay: Countries in Africa ‘have higher vaccination rates than here in the United States’

By Katie Sanders on Sunday, February 8th, 2015 at 2:21 p.m.
Katty Kay with Chuck Todd on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Feb. 8, 2015.

Sunday show talking heads continued to debate vaccinations of children — specifically, how there should be no debate — as they analyzed political missteps from the past week.

The countries besting the United States are Algeria, Botswana, Burundi, Egypt, Eritrea, Gambia, Kenya, Lesotho, Libya, Mauritius, Morocco, Rwanda, Seychelles, Tanzania, Tunisia and Zimbabwe.

United States

91 percent *

Algeria

95 percent

Botswana

94 percent

Burundi

98 percent

Egypt

96 percent

Eritrea

96 percent

Gambia

96 percent

Kenya

93 percent

Lesotho

92 percent

Libya

98 percent

Mauritius

99 percent

Morocco

99 percent

Rwanda

97 percent

Seychelles

97 percent

Tanzania

99 percent

Tunisia

94 percent

Zimbabwe

93 percent

http://www.politifact.com/…/katty-kay/katty-kay-countries-africa-have-higher-vaccination/ - 57k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rental Watch
2015-06-25 13:32:14

And is the data from these third world countries good/accurate?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 08:23:31

What, you defending that deadbeat? Bundy needs to man up and pay his bills.

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 08:26:44

This blog post sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center

Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 08:33:39

“This blog post sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center”

That s gold, Jerry Gold - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm51Nx_MaDU - 166k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 09:15:08

Bundy is a white guy mooching off the government - that’s the kind of FSA army some people would secretly love to join.

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 09:41:01

This post sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 11:31:22

That’s gold, Jerry Gold

 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2015-06-25 12:05:57

Bundy’s family and claim to the land his family uses predates any and all claims made by the Federal Government on that land, and in fact predates the Department of the Interior. But statists gonna state and everyone should just bend over and take it…

Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 12:54:40

The claim is BS and Bundy’s the statist.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 13:09:24

“The claim is BS and Bundy’s the statist.”

Why is the claim BS?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 13:15:47

He went to court and lost. His ideas make no sense.

Bundy’s claim that the land belongs to Nevada or Clark County didn’t hold up in court, nor did his claim of inheriting an ancestral right to use the land that pre-empts the BLM’s role. “We definitely don’t recognize [the BLM director's] jurisdiction or authority, his arresting power or policing power in any way,” Bundy told his supporters, according to The Guardian.

His personal grievance with federal authority doesn’t stop with the BLM, though. “I believe this is a sovereign state of Nevada,” Bundy said in a radio interview last Thursday. “I abide by all of Nevada state laws. But I don’t recognize the United States government as even existing.” Ironically, this position directly contradicts Article 1, Section 2 of the Nevada Constitution:

All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it. But the Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States; and no power exists in the people of this or any other State of the Federal Union to dissolve their connection therewith or perform any act tending to impair, subvert, or resist the Supreme Authority of the government of the United States. The Constitution of the United States confers full power on the Federal Government to maintain and Perpetuate its existence, and whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/04/the-irony-of-cliven-bundys-unconstitutional-stand/360587/

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2015-06-25 19:34:13

How long does your family have to live in America for you to be above the law?

 
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 08:37:53

The supreme court has ruled that affordable health insurance in the United States will remain illegal.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-06-25 08:51:15

Meh. ACA or no ACA, we’ve had the most expensive healthcare in the world for decades, and that won’t change anytime soon.

Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 11:22:08

“and that won’t change anytime soon.”

Got employer provided healthcare? You do don’t you Colorado.

Cadillac ‘whack’: Employers prep for Obamacare’s looming levy

Dan Mangan | @_DanMangan
Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 | 12:00 AM ETCNBC.com

Obamacare’s “Cadillac tax” doesn’t kick in until 2018, but that isn’t stopping companies from worrying about it now—and taking steps to avoid it later.

Nearly 3 out of 4 companies polled in a new survey by employee benefits consulting firm Towers Watson said they’re either “somewhat” or “very” concerned they will get whacked with that hefty tax targeted at high-cost health plans, either because of what those plans already cost or where they are headed.

Forty-three percent of those mid- and large-sized companies said that avoiding the Cadillac tax is “the top” priority for their health-care strategy in 2015, according to the survey.

That concern is accelerating an already strong trend toward having workers foot a greater share of their overall health-care costs in the forms of higher deductibles, copayments and coinsurance charges—whose dollar amounts are not factored in when calculating the tax.

More companies are also considering other cost-saving measures, such as encouraging use of telemedicine services and giving employees incentives to go to certain medical providers.

“Plan design is definitely being influenced” by Cadillac concerns, said Randall Abbott, a senior consultant at Towers Watson. He added the companies that aren’t worried about the Cadillac tax should be.

While 61 percent of large employers questioned by the same firm in another survey said they expected to be liable for the tax, the actual number that will be affected is way higher.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-06-25 13:00:09

We’re well below the Cadillac line, which is $27,500 for a family. Our is 18K, so we are well below the Cadillac threshold.

I don’t know where they get that 61% number. No place I have ever worked at offered something even remotely close to a Cadillac plan. Heck, many only offered crappy HD plans or (in the past) sh!tty HMOs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 13:21:15

“either because of what those plans already cost or where they are headed.”

 
 
Comment by cactus
2015-06-25 13:09:43

In the end all private employers health insurance will be judged Cadillac plans comrade.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 08:58:27

6.5 million Americans disagree.

Wow, the Sup Ct really burned the Repubs on this. All the court did was uphold a zillion previous rulings that legislative intent always trumps a typographical error. The Sup Ct should have declined to hear the case and let the 4th Circuit ruling stand. Instead the Sup Ct elevated the case to the national stage and burned the crap out of the Repubs. Wow.

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 09:10:11

Oh, man, the boobicans are sooooooooo done. Forget the Confederate Flag, they ought to be hoisting the white flag of surrender.

I’m lovin’ it.

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 09:26:56

And they might be dealt another blow if the Sup Ct says gay marriage bans by states are unconstitutional.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 10:34:39

Is the chief justice a RINO?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 09:17:34

Obama wins again. Sad pandas unite!

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 09:31:43

His legacy is to pass mandatory HMOs something corporate America always wanted and shut the door at least for decades on single payer and that is why the corporate lawyer Roberts has protected Obamacare. Obama takes the blame for poor service and soaring premiums and the corporations including the insurance companies and big pharma reap the benefits. Yea, that is some win.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 10:56:00

I have to admit you’re probably right on this one, ABQ.

 
Comment by oxide
2015-06-25 10:59:39

My impression was that Obama wanted people covered, now, even if had to make deals to do it. Sure, it would have been great to have single payer, or public option, but if Obama held out for that, millions would have had no coverage.

And few laws are ironclad. The Republicans always have the option of repealing and replacing with Medicare for all.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 11:25:43

I haven’t heard of any mandatory HMOs in the act. Who’s been forced into an HMO?

 
Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 13:19:57

Your employer forces you into it by dropping all of the non-HMO options.

 
 
Comment by Dman
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 10:02:40

“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to get the thing to pass,” Gruber said at the November 2013 event.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/12/in-third-video-obamacare-architect-talks-about-basic-exploitation-of-american-voters-video/#ixzz3e4ufiu3x

“Until a second Massachusetts hero arose, John Kerry. John Kerry said no, no we’re not going to tax your heath insurance, we’re going to tax those evil insurance companies. We’re going to impose a tax that if they sell health insurance that’s too expensive, we’re going to tax them. And conveniently the tax rate will happen to be the marginal tax rate on the income tax code. So basically it’s the same thing: we just tax insurance companies, they pass on higher prices that offsets the tax break we get into being the same thing. It’s a very clever basic exploitation of the lack of economic understanding of the American voter.”

#GruberGate Compilation “Stupid Is As Stupid DOES” - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_bBaXPVQns - 188k -

 
Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 11:57:53

“Stupid Is As Stupid DOES”

Nobody is stupider than the millions of red staters who STILL THINK that Saddam Hussein attacked us on 911, because that’s what liars like George Bush and Dick Cheney wanted them to believe. Repubs are outraged that families who have a child with cancer now don’t have to go into bankruptcy to pay their doctor bills. The conservative chickenhawk solution would be to send the parents off to some war in the middle east, and conservative chickenhawks are always going to want a war somewhere in the middle east.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 16:20:18

Anyone regardless of party affiliation who votes for Wall Street’s Republicrat water carriers is stupid, period. The morons who still spout the red pill/blue pill nonsense are still willfully blind and ignorant.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 11:36:05

“6.5 million Americans disagree.”

I talked to one of those 6.5 million people on a remodel job. He is a wallpaper hanger who makes about $50k a year, of course he only reports about $15k because most o his business is cash. He signed up and pays like $100 a month for his plan.

 
 
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 09:19:27

LOL!!

 
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 13:55:30

It’s pretty sad when your insurance premium for a family of 4 is as high as yer rent.

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2015-06-25 08:58:16

Yikes…..With all the various posts and diverging points of view….I have to ask you all again - is anything ‘normal’ in the true sense of the word these days? Is crazy the way of the future for us and our descendents? With all the crazy goin on I wonder if I am the one who is crazy and losing my mind - I think at times I am because I am like not with the ‘program’ as it were.
Very sad about supremes decision today and yet it was expected - Roberts et al are justice in drag as far as I am concerned. Pathetic, pathetic and more pathetic. Kiss states rights good bye.
I guess I can sum it up thusly……As I noted to a friend a long time ago - you my buddy are in a world of hurt and yet you choose to remain in your world of hurt because like a cess pool it is warm and oooey goooey and feels real warm and comfortable (read FSA here) but the fumes emanating from that pool are killing you. And you don’t even know it. This is America as I see it today.
Have a great day.

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 09:19:02

Everybody has a different point of view. Personally, I think we are living in a Second Gilded Age. During the first Gilded Age the wealthy had undue influence in Washington and treated the working class poorly, with very long hours, low pay, and unsafe conditions. There are parallels today with the shrinking middle class, huge profits by the rich and a sense that the wealthy control Washington and we common folk don’t have a voice.

When the pendulum swung too far, the people got fed up, voted out the fatcats and gave us the Progressive Era. On the plus side, women got the right to vote, child labor was ended, and government became more democratic and more pro-science. The one major error the Progressives made was Prohibition.

The ship of state in the U.S. follows a zig-zag course… too far to the right, then left, then right. I think we may be on the cusp of a new progressive era. The crowds of people at Bernie Sanders’ stump speeches suggests maybe people are getting fed up with the undue influence of the present day fatcats.

Comment by palmetto
2015-06-25 09:43:33

The Pit and the Pendulum.

 
Comment by rj chicago
2015-06-25 09:51:49

WPA - the country is zagging too far left - look at Scotus decsion today as an example. The scotus is now the most liberal in a generation +. Roberts write up has nothing to do with the law - it is per his written decision about economics and corporatism. The decision was not based in the law but in the economic benefit to a select few i.e. insurance companies.
I - being one of the ziggers on the right get the sense that NO ONE is being represented in this corruption excepting the big fat money interests - and now congress, scotus and Otrauma do at the behest of their monied handlers and the money handlers see no red or blue in their politics. They may have a D or an R - but they are all the same. Look at a guy like Steyer - here is a billionaire with a big fat D behind his name who is a big fat monied interest who made his fortune in the coal markets but is not a ‘greenie’.
There are very wealthy dems and very wealthy repukes. I agree that at some point J6P is gonna get fed up to the point where a cleansing will take place - until that time to use Rally’s moniker - FORWARD!!!
We all are being sold out to monied interests by the PTB - end of story.

 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 10:49:16

rj, when you stop pretending that America has any semblance of a future, you’ll feel a whole lot better

Marijuana is legal, I have Netflix on my smartphone, and when I’m too old to pull on Tinder I’ll just pay for escorts

Life is grand 8)

Comment by Bring Back the WPA
2015-06-25 11:02:16

For STD’s, swipe right ;-)

 
Comment by rj chicago
2015-06-25 12:51:08

Until the lights go out completely there Media - then what happens? You be in the dark by yo self and nobody but yo self.
Sorry to throw some cold water at ya.
And I want to say in all good faith, keep up the good posts -they continue to confirm the lower standards of our nation.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-06-25 14:05:28

I don’t get the obsession with “when the lights go out”. They didn’t go out in Mexico when its economy collapsed. The lights are on in economic basket case Cuba.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 15:27:41

Well, you do hear sometimes that third world countries have a lot of blackouts or “power cuts”. Though I thought that RJ may have been referring to growing old and dying alone.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2015-06-25 09:52:20

Detroit: Volume of abandoned homes ‘absolutely terrifying’
Detroit has had more homes foreclosed in the past 10 years than the total number of houses in several suburbs — or all of Buffalo, New York.

Since 2005, more than 1-in-3 Detroit properties — 139,699 of 384,672 — have been foreclosed because of mortgage defaults or unpaid taxes, property records show. The vast majority are houses, and the tally is so huge it shocked even those who spent years working on foreclosure in Detroit.

“When you see it on a map, it’s absolutely terrifying,” said Chris Uhl, a vice president of the Skillman Foundation that is working to prevent foreclosures…
“People come around and see no neighbors, so they steal, rob and strip,” said Talise Banks, 30, a single mother of two young boys. “They come by, take out windows, hot water heaters and whatever else from homes. There’re just a lot of problems.”

When she bought in 2002, all homes on the block were occupied. Her mortgage payment is $900 per month for a home appraised at $5,000. She owes $82,000 on the mortgage for the 900-square-foot home.

Banks said she’s lost more in break-ins than her home is worth today: Four TVs, a laptop, a tablet, a digital camera, a lawn mower and more.

“You don’t keep anything valuable here. Young guys are always trying to get in. I’d like to get some expensive stuff, but with no alarm system, I’d be a fool.”

By her count, there are more raccoons, 18, in one empty house on the block than there are people.

 
Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 10:06:02

“Her mortgage payment is $900 per month for a home appraised at $5,000.”

It’s a good thing she listened to that realtor who told her prices can only go up.

Comment by Albuquerquedan
2015-06-25 10:14:51

Her mortgage payment is $900 month, the excerpt is silent on whether she is even trying to pay it. My guess is that it hasn’t been paid for years an it is not worth it for a bank to even try to foreclose.

Comment by Dman
2015-06-25 12:13:14

I’m sure it’s not, that’s why you can buy so many houses in the City of Detroit for a dollar. And I wouldn’t even pay that, considering the legal liabilities it might involve.

 
Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 13:23:22

And let’s not even mention the unpaid city taxes and water bills . . . that are likely to add up into the tens of thousands.

 
 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2015-06-25 10:33:11

att Renters
sue your landlord today !
just use stats
won’t work if u r white

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 11:48:05

Well son it looks like while you were playing basketball Global Warming tore your ACL.

The White House Wants Your Doctor To Teach You About Global Warming

Must warn patients that global warming could make their health worse

by Michael Bastasch | Daily Caller | June 25, 2015

Americans trust their doctors, so the White House wants these medical professionals to be a mouthpiece for President Obama’s global warming agenda.

“We also need doctors, nurses and citizens, like all of you”President Obama said in a taped speech presented to medical professionals gathered at the White House, “to get to work to raise awareness and organize folks for real change.”

The Obama administration has been hard at work trying to draw a link between global warming and public health issues. The summit included the U.S. Surgeon General, top administration officials, and public health experts from around the country telling doctors, nurses and other conference goers how to talk about global warming with their patients.

The central message: doctors should warn their patients that global warming could make their health worse.

“I know we have people all around the country, in all of the regions, who are also listening to this conversation, and like all of you in the room, I hope will go out and continue to talk and educate,” echoed Nicole Lurie, assistant secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Health Department.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-25 12:00:53

Schools Still Struggling After Last Year’s Surge of Unaccompanied Minors

New York school board president: “We need more space, we need more teachers, we need more social workers, we need more staff”

by Victor Skinner | EAG News | June 25, 2015

The massive wave of undocumented minors who flooded across the U.S.-Mexico border last year have put in motion “a real cascading set of effects” that are overwhelming schools and communities.

Fox News Latino is highlighting the impact of last year’s surge in a seven-part series, the most recent part focusing on schools struggling to comply with federal requirements to educate every child, whether they’re legal residents or not.

“After being held temporarily by the federal government – for about a month, on average – more than 50,000 of children have been released to sponsors, usually a parent or relative, as they await their immigration court proceedings,” according to the news site.

“Over the last year, teachers and administrators have been left to teach these kids English, even though some of them had never stepped foot inside of a classroom and many are in need of mental health counseling following their traumatic encounters with gang violence, sex trafficking or kidnapping in their native countries.”

Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 12:23:31

Acts Of Love™

 
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 14:48:20

Free Chit Army grows by the hour my friend.

 
 
Comment by Clubber Lang
2015-06-25 12:47:11

FukenGrubered

 
Comment by Can_Bubble
2015-06-25 12:56:50

Shirley and Todd Ankenmann, a couple in the city’s neighbourhood of Bloor West Village, say their million-dollar dream home just isn’t the same since the electric utility installed a power pole in front of the house and ruined the view.

So what is to be done?

“I don’t look out the window anymore,” Shirley told CityNews Toronto for a segment that aired Wednesday. “It’s heartbreaking. It’s ugly.”

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/toronto-million-dollar-home-hyrdo-pole-809202

Comment by rms
2015-06-25 23:35:34

“It’s heartbreaking. It’s ugly.”

That $1-million dollar home is fugly too. It’ll never be paid for.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2015-06-25 13:07:46

$1 assessed value of Nova Scotia home caused by archeological find
The value of a waterfront home outside Antigonish, N.S., is in dispute after a Mi’kmaq burial site and artifacts were discovered on the property — ultimately reducing its assessed value to just $1.

The homeowner argues the discovery of the artifacts severely limits his ability to sell the property in the future. But the group that assesses properties in the province argues the unprecedented $1 assessment is well below market value and means the property owners wouldn’t pay any taxes to the municipality.

The artifact finds originally had no impact on the property’s assessed value, which PVSC set at $365,000 for 2014.

The assessment was first was reduced to $253,000 after MacDonald contacted assessors. He subsequently appealed and in August 2014 the Nova Scotia Assessment Appeal tribunal reduced the value from $253,000 to $1.

“The location of artifacts severely limits the use of the property and could adversely affect resale value,” the tribunal found.

Even though the Paq’tnkek First Nation allowed the home to be built, the tribunal stressed the Mi’kmaq connection meant “the future status of the property is unclear.”

Things would have been quite different if plain old MicMac connections had been found instead.

 
Comment by Califoh20
2015-06-25 13:11:06

Cheaper to buy US then bomb us.

Jack Ma, the Chinese billionaire and co-founder of e-commerce giant Alibaba, has quietly made a new acquisition: a 28,100-acre property boasting trout streams, woodlands and a maple-syrup operation in New York’s Adirondacks.

Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 13:26:52

And there is plenty more of Upstate NY to be bought up yet (and we’ll throw in a couple of escaped murderers for no extra charge)!

 
 
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 13:48:48

I was over at the usdebtclock(dot)org the other day and noticed in the flood of red how the “U.S. Federal Budget deficit” numbers are no longer going down but on the way back up. Hmmmmmm.

Man that clock is just pure depressing.

Comment by Califoh20
2015-06-25 14:20:15

We still haven’t paid for WWI. Why are you shocked?

Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 14:45:49

“depressing” holmes.

Comment by Califoh20
2015-06-25 15:50:38

Why so easily depressed? How does it effect your vacation in Kauai? :)

Life is good. Get the t shirt.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 17:39:52

Well, good point. We’ve been to Maui but now I’m gonna have to make plans to haul the wife and kids to Kauai!!

 
 
 
Comment by Puggs
2015-06-25 14:57:40

Oh, so we’ll throw Woodrow under the bus now, eh?

 
 
 
Comment by Califoh20
2015-06-25 14:17:50

This moocher is #2 in the polls:

Trump, his corporate entities declared bankruptcy on four separate occasions in 1991, 1992, 2004 and 2009. Typical Republican, socialize losses, privatize gains.

Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 14:54:27

Be very careful now, Trump says that HE has never gone bankrupt. You have to give him this: he knows how to work the system to his benefit.

And I would counter: Typical Democrat - Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, The Clintons, Algore . . . they all do the same, so your point is what, exactly?

Comment by MightyMike
2015-06-25 15:25:21

What do they do the same? Do they also go bankrupt?

Comment by redmondjp
2015-06-25 16:45:08

They all are very good at working the system for their own gain, regardless of party affiliation.

Get a clue - no difference between Rs and Ds in this department. Example, Billary: “We came out of the WH dead broke.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Califoh20
2015-06-25 15:52:46

huh? did Clinton(s) declare BK 4x? Al Gore? Pelosi?

I think you need to polish your Google. The truth is out there.

The DOW loves a DEM as POTUS, always has.

Comment by azdude
2015-06-25 16:36:08

pull some equity!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Media Analyst
2015-06-25 16:52:29

When you do a Google search for: Obama Africa Cannibal Communist you find some interesting things

Always remember: Media is CONTROL

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2015-06-25 19:49:33

While the fact that 95% of ‘Muricans voted for Obama, McCain, or Romney in the last two elections confirms we have become a nation of morons, the fact that most Americans have no idea what ten ounces of silver are worth confirms our national descent into IDIOCRACY.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-25/how-much-160-silver-worth-average-american-hint-less-10

Comment by Selfish Hoarder
2015-06-25 20:47:37

Actually 43% of the eligible voters did not vote in 2012. 93 million people did not vote in 2012. 66 million voted for Obama, 61 million for Romney, 1 million for Gary Johnson (I voted for Gary Johnson). Out of 221 million votes, Obama got 30% and Romney got 28% of the eligible votes. There was no mandate. A minority of people hired an agent that 70% of the people did not want.

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/library/2012-voter-turnout/

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 21:37:18

Grexit ON!? (GULP)

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-06-25 23:38:17

The Voice of America
No Debt Deal Yet for Greece
June 26, 2015 12:28 AM
VOA News

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (L), Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (C) and German Chancellor Angela Merkel attend a European Union leaders summit in Brussels, Belgium, June 25, 2015.

Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (L), Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (C) and German Chancellor Angela Merkel attend a European Union leaders summit in Brussels, Belgium, June 25, 2015.

Leaders of the European Council, France and Germany say the issue of Greek debt must be settled at a crucial meeting of eurozone finance ministers Saturday, after talks Thursday ended without a deal.

European Council President Donald Tusk confirmed Friday that no progress had been made so far at talks in Brussels, where a European Union summit is in progress. He said talks on Greece will resume - and must be concluded - Saturday at the finance ministers’ meeting.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2015-06-26 14:51:06

phony scandals

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post