June 21, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For June 21, 2006

Post off-topic ideas and craigslist finds here! Links to webpages with homebuilder incentives are also appreciated.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

159 Comments »

Comment by short ride
2006-06-21 04:46:32

any information or input on the housing market in toronto?

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 05:10:30

Hypothetical scenarios for the # gurus on this site - I think it is appropriate because many flippers thought they saw ‘easy street’:

How much $$$ do you think each of these people need to retire from working a meaningful job (non-minimum wage stuff)?

A.”Cindy” age 50, owns home, no children, decent health - slightly high BP, car(s) paid for and no credit card or other debit of any kind. Wants to get out of the rat race and work odd jobs or here and there - nothing meaningful. How much should be in the bank, 401(k), pension?

B. “Bud”, age 50, owes $300,000 on mortgages, but has $200,000 of meaningful equity, 2 children (non-professionals), wife who likes to spend disposable income, ok health ewxcept for back problems, wants to retire w/in 3-5 yrs because of back, but may take odd jobs. How much $$$ should be in the bank, 401(k), pension?

Interested in your comments and input.

-Ed

Comment by Robert Cote
2006-06-21 05:41:29

Moving targets. Age 50 retirement for SocSec will be about 72, forget that 57 1/2 stuff. What didn’t you know that there was a time when? Anyway this will certainly change before they actually retire. Then there’s inflation. SocSec and any other indexed benefits programs are being eroded by false CPI numbers. This may change inmyriad ways. Then there’s taxes. These 50 yos are yje only place to get more so any anticipation of lower taxes in the future are fantasy. Then there’s inhieritance, some will winn the intergenerational lottery others will not. Don’t forget lifespan and changing standards of retirement.

Short answer; ask me something easier like curing cancer.

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 05:58:54

LOL. Assume no SS!!! I think Bud is SOL and cannot retire. I think Cindy can retire and live low somewhat early if she has at least 700k liquid and a pension that will cover ppty taxes, etc. Healthcare/insurance is the big issue for her.

So, how about that cure for cancer?! :)

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 06:56:14

I consider keeping yourself in prime physical condition to be a retirement savings strategy - i.e., minimizing the health care you will need due to preventable conditions and the cost of medications. I have never taken a prescription drug in my life (in my 40s) other than an antibiotic once when I got a spider bite and birth control. I have never been in the hospital other than to the ER to have body parts reattached (LOL) or stitched up and broken bones set. Haven’t seen a doctor in 25 years other than above. I’m hoping to leave this earth with most of this record intact and to not have to spend a dime on medications when I’m old. That alone saves what, $300 a month or so?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by eyefo
2006-06-21 07:25:45

Also, never took a prescription drug in my life other than the occasional insulin shot (lol) and never been in a hospital except for body part repair like the broken skull from the motorcycle accident and the liver transplant. Never, I tell you. Or the occasional pain killer for detached ligaments and minor spine misalignment and chronic back pain and still haven’t seen a doctor cause I was unconcious and am saving literally thousands and thousands, I tell you! HA!

 
Comment by AZgolfer
2006-06-21 07:45:09

Txchick

I have the same lifestyle. I work out every day and keep my weight in check. There is a girl in the office that just turned 40. Weighs about 350 and takes hundreds of dollars a month of medications. I have tried to get her into Weight Watchers with no luck.

I am still planing the Phoenix bubble party for July 9th. scdave can not make it but I have you and about 4 others that have e-mailed me. Anyone else in Phoenix that would like to come, e-mail me at Kbarrett(at)CSKauto.com. Be there or be square.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-06-21 08:20:57

I was in perfect health at 32 and then got cancer with all sorts of wonderful followup issues… so it doesn’t always work, sorry. I’m glad you guys are healthy though. I also keep my “healthy”, but it can be a lot harder than before.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-06-21 10:52:35

txchick57 has had body parts removed and reattached!?!? :D Remind of that if I ever decide to argue some point with her.

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-06-21 12:44:36

Agree w/ Feepness here. Both of my parents have exercised regularly all their lives, eat well, never smoked and drank little alcohol. There are five (5) cancers between them.

We all like to believe we have control over our lives. Unfortunately, life just doesn’t tend to work out that way. It’s why I am amazed at how naive some are about health care, and how they don’t believe in “paying someone else’s bill” because they are slim or some nonsense. We ALL can have something tragic happen to us in a moment’s notice. Yes, it’s wise to be 120 lbs. instead of 350, but **in my experience**, the young people I know who’ve died of tragic diseases (and there have been a few) were **ALL** health nuts, even to the extent of jogging many miles each day and eating only organic. Lifestyle choices seem to matter more in old age, from what I’ve seen.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-21 16:06:17

“I was in perfect health at 32 and then got cancer with all sorts of wonderful followup issues…”

Feepness –

Did you check out Taleb’s book yet? One of his black swan examples details his bout with cancer…

 
 
Comment by holgs
2006-06-21 07:06:55

Holy, 700k!

You’re nuts!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 07:51:16

I agree w/TX chick about keeping ourself as well as you can. It is those pesky genetic issues though. Some is the luck of the draw, but 350 lbs is asking for slow, painful death.

Yes, holgs, 700k. If your living expenses are 25-30k a year, your pension pays at least 10k, you work on and off part-time, and you have it invested properly, I think 700k is the base minimum…. Remember, I was talking about retiring early 50s…not 65 or 67.

 
 
 
Comment by fred hooper
2006-06-21 07:05:13

One of the selling points for taxed at withdrawal IRA’s was that the money can grow tax free, and would be withdrawn in retirement years at presumably a lower income tax rate. This is just another example of wishful thinking just as Social Security is slowly eroding and ultimately will become bankrupt.
If you have a substantial amount of money in IRA’s it may be wise to pay the 10% early withdrawal penalty and any taxes now.

Comment by Dorothea
2006-06-21 07:14:49

Wouldn’t a Roth conversion make more sense? Taxes are still due, but no penalties.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by fred hooper
2006-06-21 07:24:00

Maybe, but I don’t trust the politicians to not change the rules sometime down the road. I’ve already heard some blather that Roth is unfair because all gains are tax free at withdrawal.

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 08:09:16

But you have income limits on a Roth.

Quite frankly, I think they should make the limits much higher. If you are a single person making 150k a year and you have paid off your mortgage, or you are at the end of the mortgage and your interest deductions suck, you are $h!t out of luck because SS will not be there, pensions are eroding at a frightening rate and 401(k) caps are subject to discrimination rules at where you work. I, personally cannot even put 15k in my 401(k) - they cap me at 11k. Tax, tax, tax. No relief.
No deductions for the high middle. Now if you are Dick Cheney, you are golden. I need to post the link to his return.

 
Comment by robert
2006-06-21 08:50:41

High-incomed salaried people are truly screwed. If you make more than 250K, you pay AMT (no deductions!) and you’re “too rich” for IRAs (roth or otherwise). The only tax-deferred savings you can do is 401K, which has a low limit, too. (15K or so this year.)

Self employed folks have it easier…you can shelter more $$$.

BTW: Anyone here who doesn’t pay AMT has no right to complain about taxes. You’re a “lucky duck” getting a free ride.

 
Comment by dc_frustrated
2006-06-21 10:44:55

How about I take your 250K and you take my 60K since you don’t want to pay AMT.

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-06-21 12:55:42

DC_frustrated,

LOL!! I’ll trade my income with Bill Gates as well. That way, he won’t have to pay AMT or all those pesky taxes either.

Wow, you just came up with the best way to save all the rich people from their evil, oppressive taxes. I’m sure they will be eternally grateful. ;)

As to MBA’s question: it is very difficult to guess because we don’t know what inflation/deflation, SS, pension defaults, etc. might do in the future. If we assume a very mild inflation (2% or less), I would say she needs around $1 million or more. She needs to have reserves in case “something” goes terribly wrong. A health crisis is always my first concern, especially when she is only 50 and has a long, long way to go, potentially. Much also depends on where she lives and how much she can make from “odd jobs.” IMO, she should have 80% in Treasuries, 5% in municipal bonds, 5% in metals (maybe) and 10% in stocks (including overseas).

The male friend is dreaming. I don’t see any way for him to even consider retiring any time in the near future.

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 13:00:07

not just 250k.
If you are single and make 6 figures, folks, that is only 110-120k, you are boxed out of quite a bit of deductions or tax shelters. I will be the first one to say that there is a huge difference in 120 and 250k - unless you are stupid enough to have purchased a huge McMansion and a Ferrari. Why? At 250k, you can at least be socking away $$$. At 120k, you are paying the regular stuff and maybe have a little left over for stuff - but not MUCH. And that is “wealthy”? No, it is not. A house still costs the same whether you have one or two incomes.

Tax, tax - and then bend over, America.

 
Comment by HHH
2006-06-21 14:36:09

I”d still like to know how a self-employed person can “shelter” income, unless you mean taking payments under the table, which is certainly not worth the risk. The only good reason to be self-employed is for the personal freedom. Double the medicare/SS taxes, hyperinflated health insurance premiums and lack of 401k matching contributions erode the financial benefits for all but a few SE workers.

 
Comment by LA notary
2006-06-21 20:28:15

Highly compensated employees can not contribute 15,000, they can only contribute 2 1/2%. So if you make 250,000, you can only contribute 7500 per year, at least that’s what my husbands 401k administrator says. In order to contribute 15,000 I think you have to make under 90,000.

 
Comment by LA notary
2006-06-21 20:46:10

Depending on where you work I guess I should say

 
 
 
Comment by ocjohn
2006-06-21 13:05:33

Standard answer for most financial questions - it depends …
What is their life expectancy? What is their current lifesytle and expenses? Do they want to maintain their lifesytle in retirment? Financial planners usually recommend 70% of preretirement income, but this is to low. Your probably spend at least 100% of your preretirement income in the “early” years. A better financial rule of thumb the 70% retirement income is you can draw 4% from you investment portfolio without touching principal. They you can work backwards to find out how much you may need.

 
 
Comment by robert
2006-06-21 08:38:38

Here’s the thing that terrifies me.

Suppose you’ve been a great person. You have no debt, and every year of your life you’ve earned enough to pay the MAXIMUM social security tax.

You want to “retire” and have 3M in the bank. You put it all in 5% bonds, reinvest 1% of the return (to keep up with inflation) and have 120K income.

Here are the dangers:

1. The gub’ment thinks you’re “too rich” and takes away your social security, medicare, and taxes you up your ass. You’ve been a model citizen, but you would have been better off if you saved nothing and got medicare and social security. (This is a very real danger for people in their 40s now…one way they can make SS not go bankrupt is by taking it away from the “richest” (i.e., most responsible and worth) people.

2. You live in a state with no “Prop 13″. There’s another bubble. All of a sudden crazy folks with dirty dot-com dollars (or whatever the latest craze is) bit up homes in your neighboorhood to 10 million dollars. Your property tax goes up to 60K a year, even though your little house hasn’t changed. You’re broke. But you have too much $$$ to qualify for any assistance.

I’m terrified that with cuts in SS and medicare for retired people who have “too much money”, it’ll make no difference whether you save or not.

Comment by Dorothea
2006-06-21 09:22:45

I don’t see how SS benefits are a drop in the bucket to the person you have described. Could you explain?

Medicare, now, that I get — because health-care needs are unpredictable, be our lifestyle howsoever healthy. (If nothing else, we all have to worry about environmental threats to our health.) I completely agree that a better health safety-net for all citizens (because youngsters get wiped out too!) would ease a lot of worry.

Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 10:18:23

The chances of Soc Sec being around in 15 years is slim.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 13:04:09

because 120k is NOT that much. This person is not necessarily saving buckets of $$$. SS would cover some fixed expenses, like ppty tax, some insurance, drugs, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Marc Authier
2006-06-22 00:01:28

No It won’t make any difference. Enjoy Coca Cola.

 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-21 16:12:37

Bud needs to hook up with Cindy.

 
 
Comment by bystander
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-21 07:18:41

Hey, it’s cheaper than paying 2%-3% to outside agents to bring in their buyers, which is what most builders are now doing. I don’t blame the builders (clever thinking, actually) I blame the “Judas” friend who pulls out his phone book and starts doing the devils work.

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-21 12:57:55

I just got a mailer for new homes in SD County yesterday. On one site, they are offering 6% to agents who bring buyers!

 
 
 
Comment by samk
2006-06-21 05:33:06

I posted this house on a different blog a few weeks ago, but here it is on CL again.

http://www.craigslist.org/eby/rfs/172974169.html

“Please do not enter building. Drive by only.”

For your ‘less than 600,00′ you also get a Notice of Substandard Building and a Nuisance whatever-the-document-is-called.

Comment by SlashChick
2006-06-21 07:00:43

Wow, that house looks suspiciously familiar! I could swear I looked at this house as a rental in 2003 when I wanted to rent in Orinda. (I just looked back through my email; unfortunately I seem to have deleted the email from the craigslist poster.) If this is the same house I am thinking of, it really is a tear-down. The wood floor was sinking at a fairly regular rate. The owner was then looking to rent it very cheaply to someone who would fix it up (heh.) I am pretty sure it would have needed some serious foundation work, however. I doubt it ever rented, or if it did, the tenant finally gave up this POS property a while back.

 
Comment by Banteringbear
2006-06-21 08:41:09

This is definitely the worst I have ever seen. Is there an ocean view or something I am missing?? Talk about price gouging. I think this may put an end to the term “there is a buyer for everything”…

Comment by Wickedheart
2006-06-21 13:52:54

“This is definitely the worst I have ever seen.”

I guess you haven’t seen the Marin POS blog then.

http://marinpos.blogspot.com/

Comment by Banteringbear
2006-06-21 15:21:53

LOL…anyone willing to pay those prices deserves to be cornholed…i’d camp with my dog, live out of my truck, and shower at the local gym before I’d lay down my hard earned money on those pathetic places. Any appraiser signing off on those should be sued.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 13:07:54

6 cane corsos inside

 
Comment by HHH
2006-06-21 14:47:40

Don’t enter the building because it will likely collapse on you, and in the event that it doesn’t, you’ll run away so fast that you may have a heart attack. Just stay 100 feet away at all times, at least until that 600k check from your lender clears.

 
 
Comment by samk
2006-06-21 05:36:16

Orinda fixer:
http://www.craigslist.org/eby/rfs/172974169.html

I posted this property at another blog a few weeks ago and here it is on CL again.

Can you believe this is less than $600k?

Comment by samk
2006-06-21 05:46:57

Sorry for the dupe. I didn’t wait long enough for the page to update.

Comment by WillM
2006-06-21 06:18:14

This has to be a crank listing.

Comment by SlashChick
2006-06-21 07:04:41

You obviously don’t live in the Bay Area. ;)

At “only” 600K, I imagine it’ll sell just for the land. Seriously. There were many 800K+ tear-downs in Cupertino recently… Orinda is a similar market (very upscale).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by JungleJim
2006-06-21 05:37:57

Front Page Sarasota HT:http://heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060621/BUSINESS/60621002

Comment by JungleJim
2006-06-21 05:43:59

I don’t know why I can’t get my links to work. Can anybody advise. “Builders take frugal view of market” Todays Sarasota HT:Construction of new homes staged a rally in May after three straight months in the doldrums, but local builders don’t see it as the sign of a return to the rowdy sales of 2004 and ’05.

In fact, even Southwest Florida’s big custom builders are being particularly frugal, living for the moment off as much as 18 months of backlogged orders for new houses.

John Cannon, Pat Neal and Lee Wetherington all are coping with unit sales that are off by at least half from what they were this time last year.

Wetherington is thanking his wisdom in paying down debt during the heady sales days. Cannon has instituted a hiring freeze.

They expect that the pain they are feeling is magnified considerably among smaller, less well-financed builders in struggling markets such as North Port.

Neal expects a “thinning of the herd” among those builders in this phase of the boom-and-bust real estate cycle. In fact, he thinks there is the potential to use his size advantage to pick up new, talented subcontractors “of choice” as things shake out.

The tale of the times is found in the numbers.

As an industry, Neal said “last year we built maybe 10,000 new homes in the region” while the real demand “was perhaps 8,500.”

Even the backlog of homes to be built has dropped during the last two quarters, says Tony Polito of Tampa’s Metrostudy, a leading national provider of housing market information.

Meanwhile, the number of units finished and vacant has grown and overall inventory levels are up.

To Polito, a key number is the “units completed” compared with “move-ins.”

In the Sarasota-Bradenton market, the units completed have exceeded the move-ins each of the last five quarters with the “biggest gap ever” appearing during the first quarter this year.

That led to an overall increase of finished vacant units from 780 in March 2005 to 2,004 by March 31, 2006, Polito said. That is a growth in supply from 1.4 months to 3.2 months.

“Sarasota-Bradenton has the highest level of months of supply among major cities in Florida,” Polito said.

Short-term glimmer

Despite the one-month improvement, analysts said higher mortgage rates would continue to buffet the once high-flying housing market for the next two years.

Home buyers are seeing some benefits in the form of more builder incentives being offered to move inventory.

The Commerce Department reported that builders started construction at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.957 million units last month, a better-than-expected 5 percent gain from April when construction had fallen 5.5 percent.

Analysts attributed the increase to an unusually dry spring in many parts of the country that allowed builders to start work on more new homes.

But they cautioned that construction activity is likely to slide further in coming months as the housing industry continues to slow, but not crash, under the impact of rising mortgage rates.

They noted that applications for new building permits, considered a good sign of future activity, fell for a fourth straight month, declining 2.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.932 million units.

“The longer-term trends are downward, but it is not a disaster,” said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor’s in New York. “We are not expecting a housing bust, just a housing slowdown.”

Cannon, Neal and Wetherington said they are building at a pace that is largely unchanged from the past couple of years.

“We still have sales contracts we’re working through, as do most of the builders,” Wetherington said.

He thinks crunch time will come in the late fall.

Cannon’s got “18 months worth” of homes that he still needs to complete and “zero inventory,” a position leaving him well-prepared to “ride this thing out,” as he put it.

Soft-market strategy

Neal’s soft-market strategy is to keep his core employees intact while possibly picking up talent from struggling builders to help him work through his backlog while “maintaining” market share.

Cannon, Neal and Wetherington all have heard tales of small builder distress — in North Port especially — and expect some failure in that market.

Some of the smaller builders are at risk, especially the ones that have little more than a truck, a leveraged home model and a phone list of subcontractors.

Despite slower times, Neal said he is prepared to build more speculative homes this year and next.

“Sure, it’ll be quite a lot more risk,” Neal says, but all the leading builders have made record profits during the last few years and are in better shape to manage risk now than at any other time.

In 2007, Neal expects to build 40 percent to 50 percent of his homes on a spec basis. He is pushing ahead on his newer communities, such as Forest Creek in Manatee County, where buyers are seeking lower price points.

In the first five months of 2005, Neal sold 104 homes at an average price of $594,000 — about $61.7 million in gross revenues.

This year, he has sold only 57 homes, but at an average price of $706,000, or about $40.2 million. That means his revenues may be off by about one-third, despite the increase in unit prices.

‘I can ride’

Wetherington says he is pulling in his horns a bit: “I’m pretty frugal.”

He has put off for six months breaking ground at a new development in Venice called Bella Terra, but is proceeding as planned at the giant Gran Paradiso project in North Port’s Thomas Ranch. That is despite recent news that he and partner Sam Rodgers are still looking for a third player to commit to building 666 homes during the next decade.

Wetherington sold about 65 homes by this time in 2005. So far this year he has sold 22. But the average price has risen from $750,000 to $1.2 million.

Gross revenues based on those sales numbers would be about $49 million by this time last year, compared with $26 million so far in 2006.

But Wetherington says that his financial situation is good because he taken advantage of the recent fat years to pay off debt.

Not everybody in the industry has followed suit. He expects “a few failures” among his less frugal and smaller competitors.

It is the players who “built too many spec homes, offered builder financing, bought big planes and big spreads in Montana or North Carolina, or built headquarters they can’t afford,” who might hit the wall, Wetherington said.

“I can ride for three-and-a-half or four years.”

And if the market has not recovered by then? “Lots of folks will be in a bad way.”

Despite building a new headquarters in Lakewood Ranch that is not fully rented yet, and seeing unit sales drop by half from 43 last year by this time to 20, Cannon is likewise hanging tough.

As with his counterparts, Cannon said his average sales price has risen — in his case from about $1.1 million to $1.8 million. The drop-off in units sold means his gross revenues are off by about a quarter from 2005.

He says he is not worried about his exposure.

“I have not built a spec house in years” and consequently has no inventory because all his homes are pre-sold.

Cannon is not lowering his staffing levels yet, but has decided to let attrition work its way through his work force. He also is “not taking on any new debt.”

“We’ll ride this thing out.”

– Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.

Comment by jp
2006-06-21 06:05:37

I don’t know why I can’t get my links to work. Can anybody advise.

Try putting the link on a line by itself. Works for me.

 
Comment by Flic
2006-06-21 09:26:30

Just drive through any new home development in Sarasota/Bradenton and you will see what’s happening. Nearly every house bought pre-construction was a flipper…err..sorry..”investor”. Now they are all trying to sell the newly completed houses. Some of these communities have every other completed house for sale.

Oh, here’s a f’ed flipper in one of these new home developments in Bradenton. Last time I drove through, 50% of the houses were for sale. She “sacrificing for $2k less than she paid:

http://sarasota.craigslist.org/rfs/173623603.html

 
 
 
Comment by jp
2006-06-21 05:38:05

FYI: No decline in CA. Thought you’d all like to know.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/14867139.htm

Comment by JA
2006-06-21 07:01:14

“REPORT PREDICTS EVENTUAL DROP IN HOME VALUES BUT NO DECLINE IN PRICES”
What does that even mean?

 
Comment by scdave
2006-06-21 07:18:48

I am here in Silicon valley and “AS OF TODAY” I would agree with the statements in the article….Don’t ask me about the future…I have quit trying to guess…

 
Comment by Stephanie Ellison
2006-06-21 11:22:50

They’re forgetting inflation, real rates being about 8-13% (CPI and PPI are meaningless number massagings).

Stephanie

 
Comment by Out at the Peak
2006-06-23 00:10:04

Maybe not in CA as a whole, but parts are coming down. The latest DQ numbers are out. Marin, Napa, and Sonoma Counties are down YoY.
http://dqnews.com/RRBay0606.shtm

 
 
Comment by Housegeek
2006-06-21 05:41:26

Ben, REBNY report in and freshly spun and expunged - it’s all about price increases from last year -not a word on number of sales, as they had disclosed in prior 1st q reports. But one telling quote about prices not increasing as much as last year:

http://www.rebny.com/pdf_files/ResidentialReport6_06PressRelease.pdf

You can compare this with the more narrow but more informative halstead report, which shows avg/median sale prices declining to flat:

Both of course are from the Realty industry in a market where info is tightly controlled, so take it with a grain of salt…

 
Comment by Housegeek
2006-06-21 05:42:17
 
Comment by Richie Rich
2006-06-21 05:43:07

Question for schadenfreude posters, Are you renters, owners? What motivates you to watch this RE market this closely?

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 05:51:24

Renter for 10+ years. After the last FDIC/RTC bust, was very reluctant to commit to illiquid real estate.

What motivates me is I want to buy something to retire on in one of the prime bubble/second home/resort areas and I refuse to pay these prices. I’m waiting for the blood to flow and will then drop in with cash to pick something up.

Comment by Banteringbear
2006-06-21 08:46:52

I’m hoping for the same in my old stomping grounds (Lake Tahoe) but fear that these second home/resort areas are never going to get hit because the people who own there throw millions around like loose change….

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 09:02:54

They did in the 80s too and look what happened to them. John Connally went bankrupt. That’s one big one I can remember having worked around him after he retired from public service.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Banteringbear
2006-06-21 09:30:22

I don’t know much about John Connally. I don’t hope for bright self made millionaires to lose their asses, but I also become disenchanted with the system when middle class folks cannot even afford a starter home in a lot of markets. The fact that Michael Milken has a multi million dollar spread in Incline Village (my favorite area of Lake Tahoe), does not sit well with me. This guy should be living in a weekly motel rental for how many lives he ruined. The fact that he made off with all those millions despite his conviction underscores the sickening truth about our country. White collar crime pays big time.

 
Comment by Mark
2006-06-21 11:03:01

You cannot name one single person Milken hurt. The gov’t persecuted him because of his success. But I don’t really care because he should have used his money to fund armed militias instead of a Tahoe house.

 
Comment by Banteringbear
2006-06-21 11:12:53

You are related to him either in blood or absence of moral code.

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-06-21 17:16:22

I know several people that he hurt. If you look at the charges and his guilty plea, your naivety regarding his “The gov’t persecuted him because of his success” doesn’t amount to a bucket of spit. He was not the good person you make him out to be. I worked with him, he is human prone to all the same wishes, hopes, dreams and greed. Sometimes he let greed win.

 
 
 
 
Comment by sigalarm
2006-06-21 06:07:11

I own, fixed rate 30 year with about 20 left to go on it. Bought cheap at what later turned out to be the bottom or so in 96. I watch this blog because having been in Southern Califorina for a long time, I was amazed that for the last 4-5 years that even our insane housing prices had kicked it up to “overdrive”. Given how much this false weath effect was inflating the local economy, I was very worried that we were going to be in for a worse time than the 90’s defense implosion. I monitor this situation in order to stay informed, and to be proactive about what many here feel are changes that will take place to the economy as a result of this period of stupidity we are now transiting out of.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2006-06-21 06:10:44

I’m a long time owner, and was an active investor until about two years ago because I thought prices were out of whack (which caused me to miss the biggest run-up ever). I watch because I’ve got a ton of cash ready when cash is king, and to get ideas for ways to safely invest the cash in the meantime. I’m thinking something from the treasury…Also, I get pleasant feelings of Schadenfreude and hope to get more and more.

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 06:10:58

owner. This is one blog that attracts non-dummies and ppl who are interested in finance and the econny overall. Obviously, RE is tied into this big time.

I also think that just because I am ok does not mean that all the idiots and their poor choices will not adversely affect me in some way. All finance is tied togetther and I think that a lot of the posters on this blog have it right. They are thinkers, not the lemmings who will follow a trend until they jump off a cliff.
;)

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 06:13:50

it would help if I could type: economy.

Comment by priced out
2006-06-21 16:11:03

I thought that was a cool new abbreviation for economy. Econny. Make it work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by diemos
2006-06-21 06:15:10

No matter how strong your conviction or how solid your analysis of the market it’s always hard to go against the herd. It’s reassuring to be around like-minded people and to see events unfold exactly as predicted.

Out in the real world one still gets the pitying look when you say you’re still renting.

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 06:17:06

No, the less than 5 year owner gets the pitying look from me!!!

Comment by Kiya
2006-06-21 12:36:08

*raises hand*

That would be us. We actually brought AFTER starting to read this blog - I thank this blog on a regular for firming my spine on the idiocy of any ‘hybrid’ loan types.
The house we got went for $41/sqft, and was on a lot of land. It’s less than rent for a nice apartment in Memphis, and we plan on staying in the house for at least 10 years, if not more.
According to a recent report, Memphis is underpriced by 10%, so we feel good about our purchase.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michigan Born and Phoenix Bound
2006-06-21 06:38:24

I am a home owner in Michigan that cannot sell my home (bought in 2001 w/20% down and 30 yr. fixed) and I work/rent in Chandler, AZ. I was intrigued by this blog after looking at the Phoenix market go crazy over the past year and couldn’t figure out why people behaved this way (camp outs and bidding wars). These homes were cheaply built with the garage as the main focus, no basements and on tiny plots of desert land.

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 06:46:35

Some of us are fascinated to watch a mania unfold in real time, made especially amazing given that the ashes of the dot com bust are still smoldering. Further, getting caught on the wrong side of the market could cost those of us who still claim middle class status half-a-decade or more of pretax income, so there is a high return to staying informed. Given that the real-estate-industrial-complex has captured the mainstream press with advertising revenue, they do not constitute an objective source.

 
Comment by samk
2006-06-21 06:47:33

Owner of a 30 year fixed with 10 or so left if everything goes well. I am actually learning something here. Trying to, anyway.

 
Comment by Mort
2006-06-21 06:56:53

I have owned my same small house for some time. I have endured the scorn of family and friends as they bought bigger and bigger houses and now they are getting their a$$ handed to them. I mostly fear that this credit bubble is the symptom of a much bigger problem and is history in the making. I never saw the S&L crisis coming, this one I am watching in real time. It is a shame so many people cannot find decent housing at affordable prices because of all the speculation so I am going to enjoy watching them get their just desserts.

 
Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-06-21 07:17:22

I have owned RE before. Sold to advance my career. Can’t bring myself to purchase in So Cal at these unsupported valuations.

I suspect we have an internet morality lecture coming from the new poster Richie Rich.

Comment by Mort
2006-06-21 07:23:37

I think you are quite possibly right.

 
Comment by Richie Rich
2006-06-21 09:03:24

No, no, just very interested in the viewpoints and motivations! Thanks for all the candid responses!

 
 
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-21 07:22:21

Like some on this blog I’m a former home owner (14 yrs total) who got lucky by seeing the mania for what it was and decided sell high and sit on the sidelines for a while. Ultimate goal is to buy a home in a country setting with lots of acres preferably with a shop, guest cottage and other outbuildings. I’m old enough to remember the housing market slumps of the 80’s and 90’s and have the patience the wait this out.

This blog says “housing bubble” but most readers and posters understand the interconnectivity of housing to the larger economy, politics, world, etc. This blog is great because the honest discussion and lively debate defied the bought and paid for “experts”. The future is still up for debate but I’d rather discuss possible strategies on this blog rather than wait for the govt. and msm to spoonfeed it to me.

 
Comment by Peter
2006-06-21 07:23:02

I don’t feel so much schadenfreude but concern about the economy and how the debt bubble will deflate. We rent but would like to buy when the fundamentals are right again.

 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-21 07:35:12

Sold my last property, the home I lived in, 10/01/2005. It required getting on my hands and knees, begging my wife to let go. (We designed and built the house in ‘01. She was a little attached, to say the least) Now, over 8 months later, she thanks me daily for making her jump. We currently are on the sidelines renting.

The answer to the second question is, as an industry insider, this blog gives me a voice to air-out how I really feel about this nonsense. I have already, in many instances, recieved the wrath of my peers for being vocal on my conviction of a housing bubble. People need to be informed! Finding this blog has allowed many of them to be informed. If I feel I can add anything that will be an aid to that effect, I’ll do it.

Besides, real estate is dead here. What else am I going to do?

Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-06-21 12:27:36

Wait five years and get your house back at half price? :D

 
 
Comment by homoaner
2006-06-21 08:42:14

I’m an owner. I was in my early-mid twenties when the last RE bubble hit our area. People of my generation felt so down, watching the prices soar so much faster than our wages. We believed we’d never be able to afford our own homes. Then the bubble burst and prices dropped 30%, while we moved into career jobs, and finally, the house price/income ratio worked out for us, and we could acquire homes.

So I’ve been watching this bubble since its initial run-up with a sense of deja-vu and no small amount of concern. It’s not fun watching people line up to get sheared, because the eventual repercussions affect all of us. It’s not fun watching people get caught up in the emotional frenzy of “must. buy. NOW” while you’re trying to explain to them that if they can just wait a few more years, prices will be cycling back downward.
It’s not fun knowing fellow homeowners who re-fied from fixed mortgages into ARMs to get at their equity, and are now watching their ARMs reset while they wonder how they’re gonna make the payments.

Yes, most of these people were idiots in one way or another. But most of them also took the mortgage lender’s word for it that it would be okay, because they trusted the professional. They assumed the old business relationship model was still in force, where the lender and borrower worked out a win/win, and if that couldn’t happen, the lender refused to make a deal. Now they’re gradually realizing they’ve been screwed by a lender/broker who was only interested in the short term deal, and who didn’t give a flying fig what happened to the borrower down the road. And it’s too late for them to do anything about it.

I’ve got an illegal immigrant relative who built himself a fortune and lavish lifestyle by playing the RE/mortgage vulture game. While his idiot in-laws brag about his ’sucess’, I have nothing but contempt for Mr. Married to Get a Green Card. When his house of cards tumbles, *he’s* the one I’ll be pointing and jeering at. Whatever happens to him he’s earned in spades.

 
Comment by robert
2006-06-21 08:44:44

I’m an owner! I have a house in “Silicon Valley” ca, and am building a vaction home in Florida (on 20 acres of land I’ve owned for a while, that is outside of any “development” or “home owners association”)

Why do I want to see a “correction”? Because having people buy homes they can’t afford is bad for America. Having houses priced at more than they’re worth is not good.

My house is to live in. It’s not an ATM. I really don’t care what it’s “worth”. Not at all. If the “value” dropped by 40% next year, I wouldn’t blink an eye. It’s still my house.

My house is to

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-06-21 08:58:50

Owner, modest ranch house, bought pre-bubble in fair condition for a good price from a FSBO, handled by my lawyer, no agents. Mortgage payment about the same as rent on a big apartment here, so I’m not worried about owning. No plans to move (yet!). Mortgage due to be paid off by (ouch!) 2025 unless I can’t figure out what to do with the cash and pay it off earlier.

In the meantime, with spare cash in hand — and piling up through modest living — I was looking for rental properties. Not for speculation, for proper rental property management. Unfortunately, nothing works here when you do the math, unless you build some huge appreciation into it, and then its not invesment at all, but speculation. Without double digit appreciation in the formula, you lose money for years on a rental. Nothing like renter-landlord hassles AND losing money, eh? No thanks!

So I watch this blog and wait. And the best things about this blog? Not just moral support, which makes me feel like not the only one saying the “bubble” word, but also the on-topic discussion and links that you guys provide. I really hope that armed with the info, I can at least help a lot of my friends who are less cautious than I am, especially some of my eager young friends who aren’t old enough to have ever seen a real estate bubble explode.

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-06-21 09:13:37

Oh, let me add this: We refinanced a few years ago. The bank’s agent(s) could simply not believe that we wanted to finance LESS than what we then currently owed on the house. “No cash out? Sir, you want to refinance LESS than you actually owe now? You realise you’d have to give us a certified check at closing. This is a complication…” Arrghhhh! They were rather unhelpful (only) in that regard, but obviously, OK, their job is to lend money.

At the actual refinance closing, the agent at our house said she’d not had anyone want do that before in her year or so as a “handler” or whatever they call the people who handle the final paper signing. And then…

To make matters worse, we’d even wanted to “round up” our monthly payment, thus paying it off a wee bit faster. Well, round it off a couple hundred dollars. She said scheduling extra payments from the start of a refinance was REALLY unusual. I mean, really? Were we that unusual? I mean c’mon!

I guess we just completely missed the whole house-as-ATM craze. All we did, we blundering fools, is to use refinancing as a way to lower our payments. Doh! Dumb us! :-)

I guess that’s why I don’t have a Hummer *or* a plasma TV.

Comment by samk
2006-06-21 09:52:57

Every once in a while I ask my wife why I can’t buy a nice plasma for watching the NFl and NHL. She directs my attention to thte online banking site we use and refers me to all the extra mortgage payments we make in order to maybe pay off a few years early. That’s when I remember that I really don’t need a plasma TV.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-21 11:03:16

Can we trade wives, please?! :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-06-21 10:10:03

Long time expat. Own two flats in Moscow. One flat is my primary residence and the other is rented. Planning to return to the States.

Scouting out a house to buy in the States became shocked by the increase in housing prices over the last few years. A bit more research and searching led me to Ben’s blog that provides a clearing house of information, research, and opinion that is not available to me in Moscow about the US re market and the housing bubble in particular. I find this blog very educating and as an expat I like the feedback from the guys on the ground.

Comment by VladM
2006-06-21 15:42:36

Your fellow international professional here. I travel frequently between Moscow, Russia and LA, CA. What do you think about the Moscow City housing bubble? Seems just as crazy as CA to me.

 
 
Comment by SlashChick
2006-06-21 11:19:08

I’m an entrepreneur who has been running a successful business for the past 5 years. Since I have lived in San Jose since 1999, and do not see myself moving away any time soon (my business is very much tied in here to downtown SJ), I’m very interested in buying a house. Unfortunately, housing prices are so far out of whack here that it’s become ridiculous, so I watch this blog for hopes that the insanity will end. Of course, I’m also hoping the insanity does NOT end in a prolonged slowdown for the economy, which would (obviously) be damaging for my business. Though my business is insulated a bit because we sell directly to other businesses, not directly to consumers, consumer spending does drive this economy, and the current debt-obsessed-spenders are scaring me.

My goal was to sell my business for $1 million. By the end of this year, my business will be worth that much (seriously… 5 years in, I can easily project the numbers), but my dad cracked a joke at me that just goes to show how bad it’s gotten. He said “What are you going to do with your million dollars… take a mortgage on a house?” Sad but true; if I sold my business for $1 million, after taxes, I couldn’t even afford to buy outright the duplex I live in now in south San Jose. This is a sad and pathetic part of the country when it comes to real estate. I am divided between hoping for a 50% downturn and dreading what a 50% downturn and the corresponding total stoppage of consumer spending will do to both my business and our economy as a whole.

That’s why I read this blog every day.

Comment by samk
2006-06-21 11:37:12

Get your million and move to a ranch in another state. I live near Pittsburgh, PA and a million gets you a lot out here.

 
 
Comment by Tulkinghorn
2006-06-21 11:38:37

Richie:

I need to buy a five bedroom house in a decent school district.

I don’t want anything fancy, am perfectly happy with formica and a cheap range, with an efficient heating system, safe wiring, and no peeling paint. In short, I don’t give a damn what impression I give the world, I just want safe, effective shelter for five kids, in-laws, a couple dogs, etc. What would have been considered a normal family couple generations ago.

And we are not indiscriminate, undereducated breeders - wife and I together make 150,000 per year, which is not a lot but ought to be enough for people who do not have a taste for luxury or social grandeur. Given the irrational market, it is not nearly enough.

I will not spend more than 3X gross earnings for a house - I would rather rent the rest of my life. Thus, since I would like to buy a house, I am looking for a 40% drop from the peak in order to afford something.

Since there seems to be no-one making a market for people like me, I have little sympathy for the flippers about to take a bath on their luxury one bedroom $600,000 condos or SFH superluxury 3 bedroom 3500sf 1.2 million $ houses.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-06-21 12:40:44

I’m a renter who came home to San Diego for grad school. By 2003 when I was done the prices were too high for me to purchase. )Actually, I could have purchased but refused simply because I thought the market was so over valued.) At the time I did not have the data to back up my thinking, just that the prices were absurd to a fiscal conservative which is how I was raised. (Also a social liberal - not how I was raised - sorry Mom.)

Over the next two years I watch low income friends buy high priced toys, remodel homes, and take great vacations all on less than $40,000/year. It was all “easy and stress free wealth” and I for one will never trust that. When I finally found this site (a friend introduced it and he was very good at verbalizing and backing up statistically all my fears about the market - thanks Kevin!) I realized that my gut was right and we were (assuming there is no interference) about to see a huge market correction. So I sit on the sidelines with cash in hand ready to buy if and only if the market goes back to traditional fundamentals.

On the other hand, if I am wrong I can leave San DIego (another highly educated professional leaving for greener pastures) in a year’s time. Regardless of what happens I will NOT pay half a million dollars for a shack. And the people who thought it was normal and acceptable are about to get their herd following lives destroy. Which I actually feel really bad about but there’s nothing I can do. At least they had new cars, great trips, high fashion and lots of meals out. :D But cash in the bank makes my 9 year old truck look really pretty!

 
Comment by mmrtnt
2006-06-21 13:23:05

Having sold in ‘05 to pay off credit cards and move to Las Vegas from Tucson, I was astounded at housing prices. The more I saw, the more suspicious I became about the whole real estate environment here in Nevada.

I saw 20-something RE agents with Beemers, half-million dollar 1970’s crackerboxes and a ever-expanding horizon of stucco.

I heard the term “housing bubble” somewhere and looked it up on the internet and landed here.

While we’re at it, thanks to all for the fascinating anecdotes and in-depth advice.

MjM

 
Comment by sm_landlord
2006-06-21 13:51:49

I’m a lifetime renter who owns multi-family income properties in addition to significant parts of three non-RE-related businesses. Bought my first 8-unit building (in Venice, CA) when I was 21 years old in order to shelter my employment income and build some equity.

Thirty years later, I’m looking for a house to retire in, and trying to time it so that I don’t overpay, and can afford the taxes and upkeep after retirement. Of course, I’m also very interested in the various forces that affect the rental property market :-)

 
 
Comment by BrownBear
2006-06-21 05:44:19

I am on vcation in the Bay area and took the usual tourist drive through Pebble Beach on the 17 mile drive. What the heck is happening there? Practicallyevery mansion we passed had a for sale sign. and then when we drove through Carmel, there were still more for salesigns. Looks like the market has pretty well collapsed there!

Comment by jp
2006-06-21 05:48:56

And did you throw out any lowballs?

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-06-21 07:52:34

I want the one just behind the 10th green. Yep, that’ll do!

Comment by Stephanie Ellison
2006-06-21 12:26:41

I want the one just behind the 10th green. Yep, that’ll do!

———————–

Why, so you can do target practice, shooting down golf balls that fly near your house? Funny, golfers wondering where their balls went or why it went up, and just suddenly bogeyed to the left, landing in two pieces. LOL!!

Stay out of trouble, you hear!?!

Stephanie

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Michigan Born and Phoenix Bound
2006-06-21 06:02:22

I have been watching the Phoenix housing market for a while, especially around Val Vista Lakes. Given the amount of inventory, why would anyone pay list price. I just looked at 8 sales for June and 4 paid list price despite the fact that they have been on the market for a while (3-6months). (MLS 2443895 is one) Another sold for 989k (list 989k) and it is only 3500 sf (2515676).

Am I missing something, or are these people just fools? Given the amount of discounts the builders are offering in the area, I expected that resale homes would be more effected by now.

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 06:29:02

They’re fools. Turn on your television during prime time and watch for 10 minutes.

Case closed.

Comment by Amazed viewer
2006-06-21 06:55:14

I watched some TV last night just to see what the mainstream media was pushing to the lemmings. It shocked me. One show which features 4 bimbos in NYC having lots of random sex had nothing but payday loan and car title loan ads. The ads stressed fast easy cash to let you maintain your lifestyle.

My cubicle neighbor described a young 20 something female friend of his sisters. She is married with one child. her attitude is she will live the lifestyle she wants and does not care about debt.

I can only conclude that there are a lot of people that have been sucked into the lifestyle they “deserve” by TV and media. That may be how the system has suckered them into debt levels they cannot sustain. Now I know there is a lot of affluence in this country, but there is also a debtor class.

It will be interesting. I am not rich but I am debt free and I am saving and I do have a somewhat secure job. And I am very worried what will happen when the lifestylers get the rug pulled out from under them. It will have to result in an increase in taxes unless the rules change.

 
 
 
Comment by Salinasron
2006-06-21 06:03:35

From local Credit Union: Simple ways to prepare your home for sale

1) Pay attention to pet or cigarette odors.
2) Place scented potpourri around the house.
3) On the day you’re expecting a potential buyer, pop a batch of frozen cinnamon rolls or home made bread into the oven for a great aroma.

Comment by Max
2006-06-21 07:20:14

And don’t forget to trim the bushes! (wink wink)

 
 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 06:27:20

Where is Don Meredith when you need a singer?

Fed Steals Punchbowl, Party Ends, Hangover Starts: Mark Gilbert
June 20 (Bloomberg)
The Federal Reserve has taken away the punchbowl it spent two years pouring absinthe into. The party is over, and the guests are staggering off to endure skull-cracking hangovers. So far, so predictable.

“Excess liquidity leads to mispricing of risk,” says Nick Parsons, head of the macro research group at Commerzbank AG in London. “Repricing of risk involves deleveraging, and deleveraging is brutal and indiscriminate.” …
The U.S. central bank has raised its overnight rate 16 times, and there’s more to come. Investors are bound to price risk differently when the Fed funds rate is 5 percent and rising, rather than 1 percent and flatlining.

It’s not just the Fed. The European Central Bank has cranked its benchmark rate to 2.75 percent from 2 percent in three moves, and threatens to keep going. The Bank of England now looks more likely to raise borrowing costs than cut them.

In Asia, the Bank of Japan is poised to end its zero interest-rate policy. China’s central bank said yesterday it will stamp harder on the brakes to slow its juggernaut economy. …
When the price of money changes, the costs of investing change. It’s got nothing to do with whether U.S. consumer prices excluding food and energy increased by 0.3 percent or 0.2 percent in May. Stocks, bonds and commodities are following their script to the letter. When global central banks remove liquidity by raising rates, asset prices decline.
http://tinyurl.com/jnj5v

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 06:33:51

Some economists (e.g., Berkeley’s Robert B. Reich) have suggested that BB should tread lightly on future rate hikes. Reich goes so far as to assert that the Bernanke Fed is making the mistake of fighting the last war — against 1970’s stagflation — instead of exercising sufficient precaution in the face of a deflation risk.

But if prices are rising pretty much everywhere due to a massive liquidity glut left over from the punchbowl spiking of recent years, and if other central banks are in mop-up mode, don’t rising inflation and the policy response of other central banks force BB’s hand?

Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 06:57:32

Yep! Which is why we are entering a spiraling rate increase phase world wide. Sweden raised rates yesterday, the ECB will raise rates in July, The FED - to keep foreigners buying bonds (remember we need 3Bil every single day just to stay afloat) - will continue to raise rates to get foreign investment. I would not be surprised (in fact I expect) rates going to the double digit levels. The credibility of the US is at risk. As international liquidity dries up, rates will rise to combat the world wide inflation.
…”Inflation is likely to remain a problem for central banks over the next two years, as the excess liquidity in the financial system turns into inflation in the absence of deflation shocks. As central banks fight inflation, liquidity could decline significantly, which would cause re-pricing of all assets. The global economy could experience a period of all assets depreciating.”…
Fro Morgan Stanley
June 20, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/jdbpd

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 07:02:29

I have always suspected Reich was not really a qualified economist, and I lost further respect for him when I heard his commentary today. Either he is ignorant, or disingenuous, as anyone who is paying attention realizes that Bernanke is more fearful of deflation than inflation…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 07:23:20

GS - IMHO The dollar is going to devalue by 50%. I do not see how it is possible to have deflation with a devaluation of the dollar. From the Mogombo Guru 21 June 2006
“…And if you think that gingerly raising interest rates will stop a rising inflation, you are wrong, wrong, wrong. Until the rates get so high that they cripple the economy, higher interest rates only produce higher prices, which is de facto inflation: As the producer of goods and services borrows money to finance the on-going business, the higher costs of that borrowing have to be figured into the higher prices of the final output of goods and services so that the business can make a profit. So in the short run, higher interest rates actually cause higher prices. And that’s another compelling reason, as if you needed any more reasons, not to let inflation in prices get started by letting inflation in the money supply get started.”…
http://tinyurl.com/pyftb

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 08:08:49

Hoz –

I would be curious to hear your take on this passage from the Mogomo Guru’s piece, given that you have often taken the other side when I have occasionally suggested the possibility that our asset markets have been recently subject to nontraditional forms of govt intervention:

‘To prevent that and to prove that we Americans are now as corrupt as any other dirtbag nation on the earth, the article continues “There is evidence that the US is attempting to manage the decline by purchasing its own debt. As Asian purchasing of US paper declined last month, the slack was taken up by Caribbean and UK banks that would not normally have the liquidity to make such purchases. Therefore, they are acting for a third party, and the only party that would buy dollars when a loss in value is inevitable is the US Treasury.’

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 08:49:49

GS - The US intervening or purchasing US TBills and Bonds is well known and they did not have to use the straw purchase by the UK. The US is in a credibility crisis for foreign currency. The FED does not have the ability,the bullets (ready reserve of capital) to interfere in the stock markets. The stock market (imho) is going down 50%+. To try to predict any individual stock on any given day would require a trader to know every “players” position, hedged strategy and derivative holdings against the underlying stock. The idea of a PPT being able to contain a world wide derivative market of $870 trillion with over $100 trillion in the US alone is just not feasible.
It is a lot easier to buy a few billion in bonds and hope for the best.
Signing off from the land of Hoz, Sincerely one scared rabbit

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 09:49:03

“The idea of a PPT being able to contain a world wide derivative market of $870 trillion with over $100 trillion in the US alone is just not feasible.”

Couldn’t one make a similar statement about efforts to influence exchange rates through intervention in the currency markets? Or attempting to divert the flow of lava out of erupting volcanoes?

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/of97-724/edintro.html

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 10:16:59

I am in agreement - at any given time individuals and governments acting alone or together can influence prices - the market will quickly adjust especially if there is profit to be made by getting to ditch the last dollars on the dollars “dead cat bounce”. It also allowed every decent hedge fund manager to switch to gold. I expect gold to be $1200 by November.

 
Comment by Mark
2006-06-21 11:15:24

Deflation is coming, not inflation. Gold has already hit it’s high and will trend further down from here. Austrian school says deflation.

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 11:37:22

Mark, IMHO the dollar is going to devalue. If a Frisbee from China costs $3 today and $6 after the dollar is devalued that is inflation. Salaries are not going up. The US is 47 Trillion dollars in unfunded debt - inflation is the only way out of the debt.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-21 16:15:10

Hoz,

BB perceives the twin abysses which lie to either side of the violently shaking tightrope on which he walks. Don’t you think he would honestly favor the risk death by freezing in the face of deflation to immolation in the brimstone fire of a currency devaluation? I would guess he is managing his risks accordingly. In particular, the Fed’s recent preoccupation with explaining how they favor price stability over fretting about the risk of a slowdown suggests they would prefer to risk deflation to loss of dollar hegemony. You might argue that this may not be doable, given the challenges in the hand he was dealt, and to that I will say “Time will tell…”

 
 
 
Comment by solvingadream
2006-06-21 07:38:39

Robert Reich is a political animal. For politicians and political appointments bubbles are a glorious thing; they bask in the public adoration.

Deflation is always a future possibility as the Fed eventually overshoots its mark, but right now INFLATION is romping through our economy and should have been stomped out 2-3 years ago before it got this ugly.

Things that show this inflation like $3.50 gasoline, $40 sheets of plywood, copper wire and copper piping through the roof, and just about everything else that can’t be cheaply made in China. Actually cheaply made Chinese goods have been masking this underlying inflation. On one hand this is good, as we enjoy low prices on microwave ovens, blow dryers, and rubber bands. On the other hand it skews the stats so the pain of expensive commodity goods (mentioned above, for example) is masked from the masses.

Solvingadream

Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 10:02:50

Saw this and as an aficionado of the $.50 burger from George Webb, find this inflation bizarre.
“The bill for one burger, with garnishing that includes organic greens, exotic mushrooms and tomatoes, comes out to $124.50 with tax and an 18 percent tip included.”
http://tinyurl.com/mwxqy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-21 10:57:41

I heard that commentary this morning, and realized that Reich is preaching “rachet and pawl” economics. In an R&P economy, the government will take dramatic steps to preserve any expansion in the economy. Any new high in the stock market, corn prices, export levels, etc. becomes the new “floor”, and the government intervenes to preserve those levels with interest rate cuts, price controls, and import tariffs.

Reich was saying that deflation (he mentioned the housing market specifically) is always bad. And this is dead wrong! I suppose he would have taken steps to preserve the stock prices of the dot.coms when thier P/E ratios of 10,000. Because that’s progress (according to him) and it doesn’t matter how we got here, as long as we don’t allow a backslide!

I vote for real prices based on real fundamentals, even if it means pain in the near term. Speculative bubbles always unravel with consequences. Might as well take our lumps now and get back to normal.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 11:03:40

“I suppose he would have taken steps to preserve the stock prices of the dot.coms when thier P/E ratios of 10,000.”

I suppose if Reich had been in control in the early 20th century, then we would currently be discussing the bubble in buggy whip manufacturing stock prices…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-21 11:29:46

…and we’d still be using buggy whips - because the introduction of automobiles would have reduced demand (and hence price) for buggy whips - AND REICH WILL NOT STAND FOR ASSET VALUE DEFLATION!

I saw Riech at Logan airport in Boston in 1998 or 1999. He is so small - his suit bag was bigger than he was. I should have squashed him when I had the chance!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 06:29:35

Check out Gloria Penner’s Full Focus interview with economist Alan Gin and “foreclosure broker” Eric Weichelt for a ground-zero view of San Diego’s rapidly evolving real estate market conditions.

http://www.kpbs.org/airchecks/fullfocus-tue.asx

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 06:39:38

One spurious point that Gin made in the interview was that San Diego real estate prices will hold up because of the strong job market, growing population, etc. Check out the contradictory evidence from the headline article in today’s San Diego Union Tribune, which shows that San Diego population is shrinking, and San Antonio just bumped us from the #7 to the #8 spot in the population ranking of US cities. A leading factor cited in the article is, naturally, San Diego’s unaffordable housing prices…

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20060621-9999-1n21pop.html

 
 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-06-21 06:45:02

I am so wanting to hear about price declines in California. Everyone thought I was nuts when I said they were too high back in 2002. Way late, but is my vindication. Finally forced me to leave, as wife wanted house. Now in much better quality of life area (ABQ). Burn, baby, burn - for the CA housing market.

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 06:58:09

Dude, I thought Dallas prices were too high in 1998 and 1999! I thought there was a bubble fomenting even then. Imagine my suprise that it has lasted another 8 years! LOL

Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 07:27:59

I agree with you. The asset inflation in housing started from the 1994 Fed meeting that increased liquidity. The first mention of a housing bubble seems to be from 1997! Which is why I expect a larger drop than 20% and would not be shocked by oversell to 1994 levels.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-06-21 08:11:37

It is quite amazing to me that it took 12 long years for the malinvestment in the housing sector to reach such a gargantuan scale that only those in severe denial fail to notice a problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Robert Cote
2006-06-21 10:33:17

That would be adjusted for true inflation right? My 1995 purchased house comps for 5x plus that price. An 80% decline (round trip) would put a hundred million people into permenant serfdom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 11:04:46

M. Robert Cote, Look at the Japanese RE collapse app ~80%, if anything we are in a worse position.
And now we are in a perfect financial storm; Housing is a very minor part of it. If China bails - look out below!
“…The euro is strong, stable and now increasingly seen as an alternative international currency to rival the kitten-weak United States dollar.

In late 2000 in what was intended as a rebuke to Washington for the ongoing sanctions, the Iraqi regime switched its oil transaction currency from the US dollar to the euro….
The imprecations spurting forth from Washington crones increasingly smack of the bankrupt who rails against his or her bank manager.”
June 22, 2006
Decline of dollar’s dominance
Douglas Williams
Shanghaidaily
http://tinyurl.com/hrb7j

 
Comment by Robert Cote
2006-06-21 11:54:29

The Iranian Euro/Oil bourse is not even operative today nevermind in 2000. Check the facts of those doombloggers before accepting them on face. Japan’s RE bubble wiped out $20T in value, the entire US residential RE market is only $19.5T. The Euro has half the same problems as the USD and half unique problems, just like the US. FI: the don’t have domestic oil like the US has but they have Nuclear capacity far in excess of ours. There’s dozens of similar tit-for-tats. The EU has a demographic implosion that has only two historic parallels; AIDS in Africa and the Black Plague. Mix’n'Match but it don’t look good.

I don’t care who eats this anti-American tripe just don’t ask me to eat it.

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-22 07:10:57

You are welcome to eat whatever you wish! I posted a newspaper link that is read by millions of people. Why don’t you post your links for your specious data?

 
Comment by Out at the Peak
2006-06-23 00:13:42

hoz is refering to the Iraq Petroeuros, not Iran’s. As soon as we invaded Iraq, we switch them back to Petrodollars.

 
 
 
 
Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-06-21 07:21:04

pointing out an extended asset class heading for a correction isn’t wrong.

 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-21 10:44:47

Guys, we don’t have to lose 80% or retreat to inflation-adjusted 1994/95 prices to cause mass panic and chaos. That will happen even if YOY appreciation drops into the low single digits. The flippers will pull out (or at least try), HELOC-financed lifestyles will be dramatically curtailed, and all the smug grins will turn to expressions of puzzlement.

 
 
Comment by mol666
2006-06-21 08:26:02

any of you Denver-watchers have any ideas on when the bubble might finally deflate around here? A friend just bought a place and it is giving me serious house envy.

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-21 09:00:51

Go get a 6 pack and mellow out! Your smart $$$ is on the sidelines for at least another year or two - no matter where you live.

 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-21 10:35:04

Mol - I think Denver is going to be hit hard this time, just like it was a few years after the last wave of California equity locusts moved through town. Be patient. Read this blog and the Denver media - which seems to be fairly open to the idea of an RE pullback. Rent and smile.

 
Comment by Mort
2006-06-21 10:46:26

Won’t be long now. CO is ahead of the curve because the bust started several years ago. CO is the foreclosure capital of the U.S. right now. I would say by spring you can go take a look around. Don’t get attached to anything in particular and have a discerning eye for quality.

 
 
Comment by Wickedheart
2006-06-21 08:51:30

I can tell why people are leaving, they can’t find a decent place to rent either. I’ve been looking for a 3 bedroom house to rent (I have pets)in San Diego and I’m having a tough time finding anything reasonable. I’d like to find a 3 br house, about 1200 ft nothing fancy in a decent neighborhood for 1500 to 1700. The houses I’m seeing for rent are owned by flippers going to Plan B - rent it out and cover your payment. I saw a 1000 ft 3 bedroom in the College area (a nasty, seedy neighborhood) going for $2100 a month. And the outragous price wasn’t because its by the college. The college area is pretty large. The area I’d like to rent in Mission Village/Serra Mesa has been a flipper party zone. There are waaay more homes for sale in Serra Mesa than I’ve seen MLS. Some of them are looking to sell while your renting it. I saw a small awkward 3 bedroom w/ no garage on Mission Village Dr for 1900. You could tell the guy didn’t really want to rent to me, didn’t like the pets but he was desperate. He’ kept saying the deposit is 1900, like if you can afford the deposit I guess I won’t worry about the pets. Truth is the deposit wasn’t a problem. I’m not desperate enoughto pay 1900 for that place.

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-21 09:09:07

I find San Diego rents to be beyond ridiculous. I also have pets. We gave up on moving back there after about 2 days of looking at the various ads. You have to watch out for these losers trying to sell the house while you’re in it. I see those on Craigslist all the time. “Good tenant in place!” They’d have a serious headache on their hands when they found out that I would not permit any showings while I lived there. I tell them up front that I will not cooperate with any attempts to sell and if they have that in mind, they had better find another tenant.

 
Comment by Waiting in SD
2006-06-21 12:39:46

I live in Serra Mesa, there is a house across the street for rent. I will check to see what they are trying to get for rent. I will post the info here tomorrow.

Comment by Wickedheart
2006-06-21 17:43:06

If it’s the one on Murray Ridge Rd close to Encino it’s 1700. I called and I’m waiting for an answer on pets. *crosses fingers* I looked it up on Zillow and its not owned by a flipper. :)

 
 
 
Comment by Wire Fly
2006-06-21 10:04:23

Just got this in a newsletter from an agent that sold my parents house in the sf bay area. It’s turning….

A Tale of Two Sellers in the Current Transitional Market

In having an inside view of the local real estate market over time, one of the greatest gifts brokers have is the gift of 20/20 hindsight. By using this gift, we can help clients benefit from others mistakes. Last September the local market started a significant shift away from a seller’s market. Prior to September, sales prices were increasing rapidly. Sellers were getting top dollar without doing much in the way of fix-ups or repairs. Few escrows failed as buyers were just happy to get an accepted contract on a home and they oftne closed escrow without making any requests. Today, after almost seven months in a transitional market, the situation has changed. Only the homes in the best condition and/or priced very competitively are receiving attention from buyers. Buyers are offering below list price, and, often, are requesting that the seller make additional repairs during the escrow period. Sellers who are 1) highly motivated to sell and 2) still living with a pre-September vision of the market are not getting any offers in the current market. To illustrate the problem, below are two stories about recent sellers.

Seller #1 met with their agent in August, 2005. Although their home was ready to go on the market, they wanted to make additional minor repairs and upgrades. Their agent, who was pretty insightful, suggested that the market might be about to change. He suggested that they get on the market immediately at a price around $600,000. They decided against the agent’s advice and, eventually, came on the market in October in the mid-$600,000 range. Today, these sellers are on their second agent (the listing with the first agent expired) and have finally brought their price down to $600,000. Unfortunately, the market has fallen in the interim and the home is currently worth about $560,000. By not paying attention to a changing market, these sellers have lost about $40,000 in equity, have suffered considerable stress, they are still on the market and may be for a long time.

Seller #2 met with the same agent in September, 2005. They felt their home was worth about $640,000 and wanted to do some pre-market repairs. The agent convinced them to get on the market immediately. The agent marketed the property heavily at their list price for two weeks. The sellers and agent then met again and reviewed the response of the market to the home. Based on what they learned, the sellers dropped their price to $600,000. Two more weeks of heavy marketing and still no offers. Again, the sellers and the agent met to review what was happening. The sellers adjusted their price slightly and immediately received an acceptable offer. While the sellers did not get their dream price, they were able to get a realistic sale by listening to their agent and being sensitive to the trends in the market. Had they not sold in late November, they would have lost many additional thousands of dollars in the transitional market this spring.

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-22 00:24:18

Good one, wire fly! :)

 
 
Comment by dizzard
2006-06-21 10:16:37

I’m writing from Hoboken Nj-Long time renter that bought preconstruction in jan 05 and flipped for profit in Jan 06, w/o moving in because my rent on a larger place was cheaper than the mortgage. So Richie Rich, like alot of people here, I was looking to find info from level headed people who are going against the herd, which was tough when everything is flying. Hoboken, which is far from AZ or Ca has seen some of the craziest appreciation.

A Toll Bros urban living building called Maxwell House had a waiting list of 2000 people for 50 first phase apts. All of the recipients were connected(including a few Ny giants). Now the waiting list is down to 30 for new phases and the offices are empty. And the building won’t be done for another 2 years.
LMAO and yes with a bit of schadenfreude

 
Comment by Pamela
2006-06-21 10:29:48

I just can’t put my finger on what I don’t like about this ad at ZipRealty regarding a house for sale in Oceanside, CA, listed for $599,000 - 674,900: “Recent comp sold for $722,000. All proceeds over $650,000 can be credited back to buyer for closing costs.” Why would you pay anything over 650? Or 599 for that matter? I picked the wrong week to stop drinking.

CA Renter: Whatchathink about our old ‘hood?

Comment by Tulkinghorn
2006-06-21 14:51:39

I think you can put your finger on fraud, as the buyer would be using a falsely high appraisal, then putting 20% cash in his pocket, all the while being able to walk away from the property as a purchase money mortgage in California will not leave him with a deficiency after foreclosure.

Do not try this at home, unless you like the idea of spending a few years in Club Fed (at least the meals are catered).

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-06-22 00:33:56

Hi Pamela! Hope it’s not to late for this post.

As you might already know, our section (NE) of O’side was one of the strongest markets I follow (especially the presidential area, for some reason — no HOA’s??? — not sure why it did better than most).

I am **just now** starting to see the cracks in that area. Some motivated sellers are pricing homes at around 2004 levels, and they are not selling as fast as they did in 2004. Mind you, this area saw at least a 20% increase since we sold in spring/summer 2004, even though much of SD was stalling.

The inventory in O’side has increased rather dramatically, since there is significant price compression relative to much better areas. For instance, in our ‘hood in Carlsbad (La Costa), the price per SF is actually CHEAPER than O’S. I am seeing the activity shift from the lower-priced areas to the slightly higher-priced (and better) ‘hoods.

Let me know if you want any addtl. info. I’ll give you my e-mail, if you’d like (post here, and I’ll return to the thread).

Take care! :)

 
 
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-21 10:51:29

Good news to Chicago flippers now stuck with a rental! It looks like there’s a solution to the empty houses in the suburbs.

Here’s how the story begins: “Chicago street gangs are increasingly moving into the suburbs, driven by the demolition of housing projects that once hid their illegal activities and by the perception that police in smaller communities lack the experience to deal with them, a city crime commission found.”

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060621/ap_on_re_us/chicago_gangs;_ylt=Apj4g9.4zc9kUozs80CsgGKs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MjBwMWtkBHNlYwM3MTg-

Comment by Mark
2006-06-21 11:39:40

The future of the US is Katrina on a national scale.

Comment by hoz
2006-06-21 11:50:29

It has been over 5 years since the World Trade Center went and all New York has to show for replacement is a big hole in the ground. Not proud to have as a Track record.

Comment by Robert Cote
2006-06-21 11:59:22

But the Bush Admin is an abject failure for its lack of total progress in 2 fewer yerar of rebuilding an entire nation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by HHH
2006-06-22 00:49:57

No, he’s an abject failure for starting a pointless, costly war based on lies. He shows zero leadership capabilities, and that has been the story of his life.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mark
2006-06-21 14:33:57

The global real estate bubble bursts; then mass layoffs in the real estate and auto industries; many bankruptcies and deflation; ethnic conflict when the various governments run out of money for welfare entitlements, warfare and bureaucrats. It will be New Orleans after Katrina on a national scale.

Comment by Tulkinghorn
2006-06-21 14:56:53

As a global bubble, expect global fallout, akin to the 1930s.

 
Comment by Rancho Cal
2006-06-21 15:59:52

Yeah, what a great environment to give amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. When they all lose their low skill construction and landscaping jobs, they will be able to qualify for welfare.

What kind of ’strategery’ is that.

 
 
Comment by Portland Mainer
2006-06-21 19:16:14

Here’s an interesting little article on the growing rivalry between Portland, Maine and Manchester, NH.
http://www.maine.rr.com/06/portmag/manchester/default.asp

Apologies to all outside northern New England who may not care!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post