June 25, 2006

Weekend Bits Bucket & Craigslist Finds

Post off-topic ideas and Craigslist finds here. This thread will be forwarded through the weekend. Also, don’t forget to send your housing bubble pictures to:

photos@thehousingbubbleblog.com




RSS feed | Trackback URI

177 Comments »

Comment by X-underwriter
2006-06-23 04:48:41

I know this is way too early yet, but I’m considering my strategy for timing the bottom of the market.
My thoughts are to watch the listings information. In most cities, the listings have been going up month after month. I think if we see the available listings go down for 3 or so months, that should be the bottom of the market.
Any comments?

Comment by grim
2006-06-23 05:01:08

It’s impossible to time any market. You might as well play craps, because we at least know the odds for certain.

Psychology and sentiment are going to be your indicators, not statistics. When Joe Sixpack decides that real estate “is the worst investment you’ll ever make”, take that as a sign that we are probably nearing the bottom.

grim

Comment by X-underwriter
2006-06-23 05:17:07

Grim,
I think when Babababa Bob buys a house, that’s the bottom

Comment by bulwark
2006-06-23 05:51:25

You can call the bottom with hindsight when prices are rising and inventories are falling–otherwise, it’s a risky guess.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Inspired
2006-06-24 10:41:16

Little did we know that back in 2005 we bubble seers, could not have dreamt that the historic real estate bubble would have been a precursor of this!!!!
Do you recall the Supreme Court decision on Eminent Domain, confiscation of ones private real property for the good of the cummunity?
Well king george decided to correct the Supreme’s ruling.
All the media will give great and loud priase, truth is the Executive order EXPANDs the Supremes to all goods and private property for the GOOD of the General PUBLIC!
All the animals cheered, “Welcome back Comrad Snowball, its so nice to see your return, Hiel Bush and the American people, land of the meek and home of the indifferent!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/20060623-10.html

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2006-06-25 02:50:14

Well said, sir. In response to the truly Orwellian and creepy proclamations coming out of the Justice Department, and the Supreme Court rulings stripping away individual rights and civil liberties, the bovine masses contentedly chew their cud with utter indifference.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 17:40:47

“Heil Bush”

 
 
Comment by ml in fl
2006-06-25 14:55:30

I think it’s when you cry when you sign the offer

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:17:33

We can measure the real price of homes using the price/rent or price/income ratios. I cannot speak for your part of the planet, but in California, these ratios have exhibited cycles of 10-15 year duration for a very long period of time (at least to 1890), and we are currently at the highest-ever real price level, according to these measures. Are you suggesting that we may have reached a permanently high plateau, or would you predict these measures of real prices of housing to revert closer to historic norms over the next seven-or-so years?

 
 
Comment by bystander
2006-06-23 05:21:57

We aren’t even close until your local paper runs WEEKLY ads from HUD and VA listing at least 25 repossessed homes in your area that are all vacant and have been for some time. Also, other than HUD and VA, you can’t get a loan from anybody with less than 30% down for an investor and 10% down for a primary residence.

Then you can start thinking you may be at the bottom.

Comment by DC_Too
2006-06-23 05:28:49

You guys are all right - calling the bottom will be mostly art. Sentiment, when even the pros are counseling young people to “stay away from the real estate business,” will be a good indicator.

I don’t know where ‘Bystander’ is from, but there was a separate, weekly insert in the Washington Times during the ’90’s with all those HUD/VA foreclosures - an insert! Not just a few ads.

Time will tell.

Comment by bystander
2006-06-23 06:02:25

I’m in the Phoenix area. An insert. That’s big. I don’t remember those but don’t doubt they appeared somewhere.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by waiting_in_la
2006-06-23 06:25:13

I think that we all did an awesome job of calling the top last July!

…even if it was the fourth or fifth time it was called ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by DAVID
2006-06-23 05:43:34

When foreclosures are running rampant and equity lenders are pulling their hair out trying to keep things going, then the market has hit bottom.

Comment by Inspired
2006-06-24 12:10:29

David:

I would define the bottom this way!
When one’s home is not an investment but a depreciating asset.
That is what it once was and infact that is what it is…a capital good, that over time devalues due to wear, lack of maintenance, life styles, etc.
Also long before the bottom there will be 6 month mortgage payment moritorium as in Detroit in the 70’s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:20:38

Inspired –

I totally agree! The mania mindset that houses are the source of another paycheck has to give way to the realization that existing homes impose an aggregate maintenance burden on society, as they are a depreciating asset which suck in $$$ for maintenaince, insurance, property taxes, and interest payments on the loans used to buy them. Only when it dawns on society at large that a home cannot be used as a source of wealth creation will we be sure this mania has ended.

 
2006-06-25 19:17:40

Can we get a 6 month moratorium on rent too? (smile).

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2006-06-25 02:52:17

When fistfights break out between rival groups of day-job seekers - Mexican illegals vs. unemployed realtors and FBs — then I’d say the bottom is in.

 
 
Comment by Steve in Flyover Land
2006-06-23 06:22:07

When you see the cover story on Time Magazine about how home ownership is dead and future generations will all be renters because homes are such bad investments.

Comment by X-underwriter
2006-06-23 06:25:37

I agree,
I remember last summer Time had an article about the housing market and how everyone was flipping and making millions.
Last summer was the peak

 
Comment by NH_renter
2006-06-23 06:40:02

I called the peak based on a Fortune (or was it Forbes?) special real estate edition last summer. I learned from the dot.com phase that as soon as the mainstream media is talking about a hot investment that investment is about to get pretty cold. Hmmm, a lot of stories about hedge funds lately…

Comment by X-underwriter
2006-06-23 06:48:09

You’re right, that article was in Fortune not Time

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by JungleJim
2006-06-23 08:51:24

BINGO!!

 
Comment by Upstater
2006-06-24 07:18:48

I was just thinking that if the market is going to be stagnant for 10+ years, finding the bottom may not be good enough. Timing the next rise and beating it may be what you want to do. Just a thought. Everyone’s housing needs will be different.

 
Comment by fiat lux
2006-06-24 10:56:30

The ‘cover story phenomenon’ is a good indicator that you’re near a turning point in many trends, either top or bottom.

 
 
Comment by Max
2006-06-23 07:12:30

The sure way to time the bottom - when YOU think the RE is the worst investment, when you won’t even contemplate of buying, then it’s probably the bottom.

Bottom - when the last bull capitulates.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:24:04

I might add that the reason you won’t even contemplate buying will be partly due to recessionary conditions, which will make prospective sellers question whether it is a wise idea to lock in a commitment to purchase a home, given the risk of job loss coupled with falling home prices. This combination of conditions increases the risk of getting stuck in the position of having to sell a home while underwater…

 
 
Comment by Bubble Butt
2006-06-23 08:19:28

I would add this to the list of one of many indicators I have.
One of the best ones I have is three friends who always buy at the top and sell at the bottom (both stock market and housing).
When they start saying how terrible RE has been for them and their friends, then I know we are probably at a good time to start looking.

 
Comment by passthebubbly
2006-06-23 09:48:11

When you’ve finally decided to buy, and 6 months/1 year/5 years later you’ve become so frustrated that you’re regretting the decision and are thinking of selling, then THAT will be the bottom.

That’s the way it works with value stocks, at least.

 
Comment by HouseWatcher
2006-06-23 10:28:48

What about the trends in affordability index? I had the same thought this morning and, while it is all guess and hunch, there is educated guess and hunch vs. pure guess and hunch. My thought was to look historically to see if there is a correlation between the affordability index for an area and the percent decrease from peak. Thoughts?

 
Comment by HouseWatcher
2006-06-23 10:46:48

Not sure where my earlier post went, so this is a repost.
My comment/question is: how do people figure the affordability index factors in? I know that in California it is extremely low from a historical standpoint. Not that, for my hometown, affordability is almost nonexistent (from CNN article): “In Los Angeles, the least affordable big metro area, only 1.9 percent of the homes sold were within the reach of families earning a median income for the city of $56,200.” Crazy.
So, to rephrase, is there an index number generally associated with the bottom of downturns?

Comment by mousebender
2006-06-23 12:03:07

Here is the complete history of affordability index figures from the NAHB. It’s a 487 kb Excel spreadsheet, so it’ll be slow over dialup.

Here is the history of the last peak in the Los Angeles market:

Quarter/Affordability/Median price

Previous market peak:
1991-Q3 12.9% 186,000

Previous market low:
1997-Q1 50.2% 158,000 (lowest price: -15% from peak)
1998-Q1 50.7% 172,000
1999-Q1 51.3% 180,000 (highest affordability)

Current market stats:
2006-Q1 1.9% 500,000

The last peak topped out at 12.9%. Now LA’s at 1.9%. It passed 12.9% two years ago.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 06:21:05

Nice link Mousebender!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 06:23:00

Get my tinfoil hat on…

Good, Why does Santa Ana-Irvine have so little data?

2 yrs instead of 11 yrs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-24 09:02:17

I posted this video about the tinfoil hat on another thread but really it’s just too funny to miss so I’m re-posting. I swear it’s funny!

http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 18:16:13

Huggybear –

That is funny, but also irksome in a way, as it reminds me of the standard practice on this blog for dismissing any idea which seems farfectched to the reader:

“Put on your tinfoil hat.”

That is a cheap way to communicate the message, “I am too lazy or dumb to bother constructing a coherent argument about why your idea does not hold water. So instead, I will just insinuate that you are a wacko, and be done with it.”

 
 
Comment by solvingadream
2006-06-24 09:03:27

Those numbers are just wild, hard to believe. From 51% affordability in 1999 down to 1.9% now.

WOW!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by robin
2006-06-24 17:49:49

Yeah, but it’s based solely on income. With 65 to 70% of our citizens owning homes, you have to think about their equity.

Unless they bought in the last two years, most homeowners sit on a fair chunk of cash.

I know I sure as hell couldn’t buy my house at today’s price with our income. NO chance at all.

If I add in my equity, it’s affordable. I bought it in 1987, though. No HELOCs.
Lifestyle differences may prove a greater factor than previously thought in analyzing the affordability situation.

Still, 51% to 2% speaks volumes.

 
Comment by Peter Gerard
2006-06-25 09:29:40

Robin- Great point! I have spoken with many of my friends, all over 50, no way in hell could we afford to buy our houses today. Bought mine in 1980.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:28:53

Nice post. My guess is that the lending industry did not loosen the purse strings in the early 1990s to the degree they have this time, in part due to the fact that a recession had officially just taken place from 1990-1991, and the risk of having to sell due to job loss was quite high (esp. in CA).

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SeattleMoose
2006-06-24 21:38:42

Slam dunk! When Ben starts “The Housing Bust Blog” it is time to start buying. He has a much better barometer than all the so-called “experts”.

 
Comment by Paul Cooper
2006-06-25 08:26:16

I disagree. Looking at the last bubble in the 80s, prices will continue to go down even if inventory stabilises or even if it starts to reverse course. IMO, the housing bottom will not be reached for at least 5 years and after that prices will stay stagnant for at least that much more. We are just but at the first inning. I expect house prices to be down 50% from current ones once it’s all said and done.

 
Comment by bearmaster
2006-06-26 06:22:17

Ever read a book called “Timing the Real Estate Market” by Robert Campbell, a very experienced San Diego builder who has gone through a few decades of market ups and downs? Here is a review.

 
 
Comment by short ride
2006-06-23 04:56:55

Any comments/opinions on the housing market in Toronto?

Comment by TroutMask
2006-06-23 05:19:04

the time it takes to sell a home has grown longer, prices are holding (for now), lots of propaganda in toronto about a ’soft landing’.

the chief economist for BMO says ‘dangerous conditions exist’ and ‘this will all come to an ugly end’ (i’m quoting from memory but he used those words).

 
Comment by PT
2006-06-23 06:23:09

Massive high-rise luxury condominium projects continue, with a lot of the units being sold to investors who will not be able to rent them at a price high enough to cover PITI + fees. sound familiar?

 
Comment by TroutMask
2006-06-23 06:56:19

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1150408210837

some choice quotes:

“Speculative buying in some condos could be as high as 40 per cent, according to some estimates.”

“The analyst has said in the past that there was “high risk” that the Toronto market is being overbuilt.”

“While banks have cut down their exposure to condo loans, some analysts have said the risks have shifted toward condo buyers who are putting up the bulk of the down payment for condos in hopes that the market will continue to appreciate.”

Comment by TroutMask
2006-06-23 07:00:10

more canada stuff:

Net worth hits $141,000 a person

Globe and Mail

Canada’s national net worth rose to $4.6-trillion, or $141,000 per person, at the end of the first quarter as real-estate values and equity markets swelled, a government report said Friday.

full article:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060623.wnetworth0623/BNStory/Business/home

 
 
 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-23 04:57:37

The bubble made the front page of yahoo this morning!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060622/us_nm/economy_housing_usa_dc

 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-23 05:00:24

X-underwriter,
If it was me, I would wait until prices bottomed out and then started to increase. You wouldn’t get the absolute cheapest price, but almost the cheapest price. But I’m pretty risk-adverse.

Here is my craigs list contribution, for those of you looking for an investment opportunity.
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/rfs/172579998.html
The current owner bought it in June 2005 for $520k and it looks like he refinanced in September 2005. I guess he didn’t spend any of the money on the house since it needs so much work. Funny that he would be looking to sell such a sure-fire investment. The assessed value is only 478k, FWIW.
More pics (nice kitchen–the aluminum foil adds that special something!)
http://www.obphomes.com/property/index.cfm?ID=49172&start=1&sc=16943&propertytype=&winpop=0&show=1&listingsperpage=22

Comment by L
2006-06-23 06:12:28

Isn’t there some kind of law forbidding people from making these kinds of promisses? Telling people if they buy something how much money they will make on it unless they are gauranteeing a refund? Did’nt Amway get in big trouble a few years back with the government for making false claims on income you could be making for an “investment opportunities”?

Comment by PontiacMI
2006-06-23 07:46:15

Amway did get into trouble. They simply changed a few things, and are still here today. The scam goes on…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quixtar

 
 
Comment by Me
2006-06-23 06:59:29

Zillow the house. Note how the house at 5226 (with a double lot) sold for 360k 5/2006.

http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?city=SPRINGFIELD+&state=VA&zprop=51884951

 
Comment by Out at the Peak
2006-06-23 07:22:45

That alone might not be a good indicator, as you might fall victim to a dead cat bounce. The last bubble gave you almost three years of flat prices during 1994-1996, but other fundamentals were involved such as touching the mean.
In the end, you should start seeing good fundamentals as well as psychology running from RE.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-23 08:22:41

That dishwasher looks like a near-mint collectible. So easy to use, too — just “on” or “off.”

 
Comment by Bubble Butt
2006-06-23 08:31:53

I think some of you may have overlooked that the scam some of these guys are doing is that they are paying full price and getting cash back at the close.

They can still sell at a loss and have made money.

 
Comment by bacon
2006-06-23 08:32:37

speaking of Amway/Quixtar, there’s a dude that hocks herbalife crap at the gym in the Bradlick stripmall by this house. it wouldn’t surprise me if this was his place…

 
 
Comment by david cee
2006-06-23 05:11:36

Look for vacant houses and condos with out of state owners. Most likely investors feeding an alligator. Find out what they paid for house (agent, title company, assessor)and start offering way below comps.

 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-23 05:15:28

I think my post disappeared? Apologies in advance if this is duplicative!

Great investment opportunity for all you savvy investors!
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/rfs/172579998.html

Purchased in June 2005 for 520k and refinanced in September 2005. Doesn’t look like any of that refi $$ was put back into the house, what a dump! Assessment is 478k.
Pictures (check out the divine kitchen!)
http://www.obphomes.com/property/index.cfm?ID=49172&start=1&sc=16943&propertytype=&winpop=0&show=1&listingsperpage=22

Comment by DC_Too
2006-06-23 06:45:45

Good find, MeShell. I know exactly where that house is - I’ve a friend who lives in that development. She bought when her kid was born in 1999 for $175,000, if I remember correctly. Half a million in that subdivision is really astounding.

Comment by X-underwriter
2006-06-23 06:53:56

I’d say the post-bubble value of that home will be around $250,000 - $275,000, not much more

Comment by Incredulous
2006-06-23 07:09:50

Am I the only one who sees a price of forty thousand, not four hundred thousand?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-06-23 07:19:06

You’re not the only one. I htik “40k gets you in”, that kind of scam, and then you get to assume the $3400/month note on the house. What a deal — NOT!

But if you do go for it, make sure you write into the contract that the tin foil stays!

 
Comment by Incredulous
2006-06-23 07:25:11

Isn’t this extremely deceptive?

 
 
 
 
Comment by KIA
2006-06-23 09:28:17

Ooo, that’s nice. Notice the “rent the upstairs for $1,800 and the downstairs for $1,100″ (illegal zoning code violation) against the advertised mortgage of $3,400.00 per month, for a net of -500.00 per month. Let me rephrase: “Hey, buddy! Why don’t you give me a chunk of cash and go negative on your cash flow by illegally renting this house out!” Then the ad suggests you’ll be able to sell it in 18 months.

Why do I have the impression that the current owner bought into this exact same line of hooey and now wants to pass along the joy?

 
 
Comment by bobbymac
2006-06-23 05:32:40

As I was leaving for work this morning, there was a pamphlet stuck on the knob of my door from a Century 21 agent advertising some homes in the area. Every last apartment had the same pamphlet. I felt like I was back in New York where the Chinese food delivery guy slips the menus under everybody’s door. The end is near…

Comment by Bill In Phoenix
2006-06-23 06:12:16

“As I was leaving for work this morning, there was a pamphlet stuck on the knob of my door from a Century 21 agent advertising some homes in the area. Every last apartment had the same pamphlet. I felt like I was back in New York where the Chinese food delivery guy slips the menus under everybody’s door. The end is near…”

Actually, about 18 months ago while living in Los Angeles, my apartment building’s bulletin board had a real estate agent’s glossy flier posted. It was far from the end. I think the post lasted only a week before someone took it down. I was laughing at such a tactic. I thought the end was near. I’ve been completely out of real estate for ten years and no longer have regrets about it. This weekend I’m going to order a T-Bill online and perhaps a savings bond along with it. I sold some stocks and have lots of cash, so I’m in a good situation, waiting for good buying opportunities. I prefer to wait for good stock buys for now. I think the bottom in Real Estate will be several years away.

 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2006-06-23 09:52:32

I finally had to post a sign on my door a few weeks ago telling the bored realtors and loan officers to go away and take their flyers with them. The DHL delivery guy was laughing about it as he dropped something off yesterday.

 
 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-23 05:35:16

Sorry for the double post. ESTO. ;)

 
Comment by Atlanta_Renter
2006-06-23 05:38:40

I want to know when the Fed’s going to update the Statistics for Household Debt Service and Financial Obligations Ratios. The last report was 4Q 2005. Is there a good reason why they’re not updating this anymore? In 4Q 2005, the household debt due to mortgages is the highest it’s ever been since 1Q 1980. Interesting….

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/default.htm

Comment by hoz
2006-06-23 07:50:25

“The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.”
- John Kenneth Galbraith

Comment by hoz
2006-06-23 08:07:03

I am posting the FOMC Transcripts from March 22, 1994
(caution 63 pg pdf)
This meeting is the start of the asset bubbles including housing both in the US and International.
Greenspan et al discuss the implications of the Bubble and why it did not burst when they tightened up credit for several weeks before they finally open the spigot.

IMHO this took 12 years to get to this F’d position - it will take at least that long to get out.

http://tinyurl.com/ptw3d

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 17:59:22

Hoz –

To be honest, I believe the annals of history will date the beginning of the asset bubble economy to June 2, 1987…

“Chairman of the Federal Reserve

On June 2, 1987 President Reagan nominated Dr. Greenspan as a successor to Paul Volcker as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the Senate confirmed him on August 11, 1987. After the nomination, bond markets experienced their biggest one-day drop in 5 years. Just two months after his confirmation he was faced with his first crisis — the 1987 stock market crash. His terse statement, “the Fed stands ready to provide all necessary liquidity” is seen as having been effective in controlling the damage from that crash. Another famous example of the effect of his closely-parsed comments was his December 5, 1996 remark about “irrational exuberance and unduly escalating stock prices” that led Japanese stocks to fall 3.2% [7].”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Greenspan

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 18:04:32

‘His terse statement, “the Fed stands ready to provide all necessary liquidity” is seen as having been’ …

the birth of the Greenspan put.

 
 
 
Comment by robin
2006-06-23 22:36:45

Priceless!

 
 
 
Comment by wawawa
2006-06-23 06:02:36

Any comments or observations about housing market in Temecula/Murrieta (California) market.

Comment by txchick57
2006-06-23 06:11:44

Other than you’d have to be certifiably insane to buy there?

 
Comment by Bryce Mason
2006-06-23 06:21:55

My Realtard(R) informed me that Temecula would keep going up forever, and that soon it would take 4 hours just to exit Winchester Road off the I-15.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 17:36:10

Realtard (R)

 
 
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-23 06:24:23

My observation is it used to be nice when it was called “Rancho California.” Since then it’s gone downhill.

 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-23 06:51:57

Come on people! Temecula isn’t that bad. There are some nice new neighboorhoods there, the setting is nice (surrounded by desert mountains) and the casino virtually guarantees a regular traffic of visitors with money to spend. I wouldn’t mind living there so much if I worked in Riverside or north SD county.

The problem with the Temecula/Murrietta market, IMHO, is that the speculator activity there over the past couple of years has been even more intense than in other parts of the inland empire. So it’s probably set up like Riverside/Corona/SB/Rancho for a big backslide in median price over the next couple of years.

I work in El Segundo (between LAX and Manhattan Beach), and I have almost two dozen co-workers that commute back and forth to Temecula 4 days a week. That’s a brutal 2.5 hour ride in heavy traffic. Once they see thier property values start to slip, they are going to want to downsize out of thier McMansions and move back into smaller houses closer to work.

Comment by SlashChick
2006-06-23 11:49:41

El Segundo to Temecula? Jeez… I hope they bought stock in oil companies with the money they saved by that commute.

 
Comment by azrenter
2006-06-24 12:32:35

i used to commute from riverside to el segundo air station 91 freeway on fri nite is lots of fun.

Comment by huggybear
2006-06-24 15:57:25

I met someone at LA AFB (worked at the wellness center) who said she commuted from LA to Palm Springs. That’s alot of time on the I-10.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by peter m
2006-06-25 11:54:16

I sympathize with your friend. That is a long.long commute. Must be really bad on fridays. I once commuted from Palm springs on a friday afternoon and it took me 3.5+ hrs to get to Long Beach. I took every shortcut possible, using van Buren ave to get around the 60/215/91 bottleneck in Riverside.

 
 
 
 
Comment by sellnrun
2006-06-24 19:55:48

Inventory has doubled since July 2005. No place to buy right now…

 
Comment by lililegs
2006-06-25 08:24:50

Every time I hear the name “Temecula” I can’t help but think of some sort of STD or skin disease:
Oh my god! You’ve got Temecula!

 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-25 11:25:00

temecula has a quaint little well preserved old town. It and murrieta also have a large and growing modern industrial park. The whole area is expanding very fast but at least in an orderly fashion (unlike the slapdash unplanned growth in Much of the inland empire).

New Housing developments/residential communities are springing up and down the temecula valley from Corona south thru temecula, with the 15 frwy as the central trunk. Dos lagos is one of many master-planned communities in this mix:it is off the 15 at cajalco rd and is half-way to completion.

Traffic congestion will only get worse along the 15 and the 91 as there is no way to get around the corona bottleneck.

Comment by peter m
2006-06-25 12:26:17

Didn’t mean the Beer by that name. What I mean’t was that if you commute from Temecula up the 15 frway toward corona on your way to LA/oc there is no alternate fast highway or parkway which will get you around the frequently jammed 15/91 corona “bottleneck”. In cases where there was a sigalert or bad acident( I keep tuned in to traffic conditions on AM 1070))I Have used temescal Canyon road as aternate side road all way to ontario rd(Corona). then gotten back on 91 using either lincoln or main st, both slow corona city street routes.

This still leaves you with the section of 91 goin.g thru the Santa Ana Canyon from Corona to east anahein, for which there is no alternate route.( except taking the 71 north to the 142(carbon canyon rd) then over the chino hills and connecting to the 57 at lambert-imperial hwy, a long out of the way diversion taking over 1 hr

 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-06-25 15:09:20

The entire southwest riverside county region(south of the 91-60/east of the 15/west of the 79(basically a giant inverted triangle with temecula as the southern tip)is exploding with new and recently built housing tracts. Did a zillow map pan and the entire level surface(and every available hillside) of this rather arid and sun-baked area is being gouged and bulldozed for housing .

This won’t pan out too well for the current homeowners in this region who are trying to sell for top dollar. As many developments are just being graded or halfway/close to completion this will result in a crush of new homes coming on line over next several years, resulting in inventory overload and probable price reductions, maybe as bad as phoenix bubble.

I always though that the San bernardino/rialto/fontana area was the biggest IE area in exploding new home tracts but southwest riverside may be even bigger, far bigger.

 
 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-23 06:51:04

$175,000 seems like a fair price for that place! Maybe even 200k.
But for over a half a million bucks, the greedy sellers should at least clean the place up! There was rubbish piled in the yard!

 
Comment by homoaner
2006-06-23 07:22:10

Ameriquest Parent Sees Steep Drop in Earnings
By E. Scott Reckard, Times Staff Writer
June 23, 2006

Profit at Ameriquest Mortgage Co. and its affiliates plunged 81% last year, reflecting a brutal price war over loans to higher-risk borrowers, rising interest rates and the company’s agreement to pay $325 million to 49 states to settle allegations of predatory lending.

Orange-based ACC Capital Holdings Corp., the privately held parent of Ameriquest and its sister lenders, earned $257 million in 2005, down from $1.34 billion in 2004, according to copies of its annual financial statements obtained by The Times. Revenue fell from $4.13 billion to $3.67 billion.

The numbers shed light on Ameriquest’s recent decisions to close its national network of 229 retail branches and eliminate more than 5,000 jobs to operate more efficiently. In addition to these moves, the company says that this year it has scaled back its aggressive price cutting on loans.

The steep discounts, part of an industry battle for market share at a time of rising interest rates and slowing housing markets, drew an unusual rebuke last February from Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, who accused rivals Ameriquest and New Century Financial Corp. of Irvine of being “irresponsible” spoilers of the industry’s profitability.

ACC Capital caters to the “subprime” market of borrowers with spotty credit or other issues that stop them from getting lower-cost “prime” loans. It was the largest subprime lender in 2004 and 2005, but fell to No. 6 in the first quarter of this year, according to a mortgage industry publication.

If anything, Ameriquest’s market share is likely to erode even more, said Robert P. Napoli, who analyzes the mortgage business for investment advisor Piper Jaffray Cos. “They’ll be lucky if their volumes don’t fall by 90% on the retail side,” Napoli said. “Maybe they can eventually come back, but I think they’ll become a minor player for a while.”

In a series of articles last year, The Times detailed allegations from current and former employees that management pressure to boost loan volume created a “boiler room” atmosphere in which Ameriquest workers forged documents, misled borrowers about rates and fees and inflated customer incomes and home values to qualify them for loans they could ill afford.

The subprime mortgage industry overall expanded from $530 billion in 2004 to $665 billion last year, according to the industry publication Inside B & C Lending.

But some observers saw in Ameriquest’s earnings a reflection of hard times ahead for the entire industry.

“We are expecting some subprime lenders to go out of business this year,” said Christine Clifford, vice president of Wholesale Access Mortgage Research & Consulting Inc. in Columbia, Md.

“The combination of a shrinking market, rising costs and lots of lawsuits is extraordinarily difficult to manage,” she added.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ameriquest23jun23,1,6075466.story?coll=la-headlines-business

 
Comment by hoz
2006-06-23 07:28:22

And if you don’t think you should be scared about a coming depression.
Read this.

The life of a twenty-something on a Wall Street trading desk can be miserable. If you’re not slaving over a spreadsheet late into the night, your boss is whacking you on the head with his BlackBerry for botching an options order. So it’s no surprise that many beleaguered Gordon Gekko wannabes fantasize about running their own hedge fund — and, oh yeah, collecting the standard 2% of assets and 20% of profits….”Opening a hedge fund is easy: It’s just paperwork,” says 30-year-old Jonathan Hoenig, managing partner at Chicago hedge fund Capitalistpig Asset Management, which he founded in August, 2000, following a two-year stint as a futures trader at the Chicago Board of Trade (after dropping out of college). The tough part, Hoenig says, is raising money. After all, who in his right mind would entrust a million bucks to someone born during the third season of Cheers?…”
http://tinyurl.com/msa4h
Getting in does not worry me - It is getting out of a crap position that scares me.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-23 07:34:17

Hedge fund are kind of like hell, easy to get into and very hard to get out of.

Apologies to Buffet/Munger as they had a similar quote in 2003 in their annual report.

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-06-23 09:43:01

I remember Hoenig getting booted off Realmoney a few years ago for insulting Booyah Boy or something like that. He was a little worm.

Comment by Joe
2006-06-25 05:10:42

Hoenig is on Cashin-In on Foxnews every Saturday at 10-11 am. Has been right quite a bit this last year.

 
 
 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-06-23 07:38:01

The way I read that ad, is that I pony up $40K, and I would own that property and clear. If I don’t have 40K, he will let me make him payments of $3400 until the 40K is paid. That would take about one year. I’m sure he wants $40K cash now, and someone to take over the $3400/mo note. Assuming that, he is a spectacular flopper.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-23 11:07:10

Be careful ,if it isn’t a assumable loan note the lender could call the note .

Comment by Waiting in SD
2006-06-24 09:26:37

Be careful is an understatement, who in there right mind would by that POS. A better statement is, do not even think about buying that POS.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-25 06:53:14

Yep , thats the real truth Waiting in SD , I should of been stronger in my statement .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Brandon
2006-06-23 08:11:02

More instant equity in Boise: http://boise.craigslist.org/rfs/174564659.html

The seller/investor says “I have other real estate deals and would like to move on. Discounted for fast sale”

He probably can’t cover the negative cash flow.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-23 08:39:18

I was reading an Orlando Sentinel article online and saw a link to this article from April 14:

“Orlando housing values are safe
The risk of a drop in local home prices is far less than the U.S. average, data show.”
“Don’t worry about that real-estate bubble bursting just yet — at least not in Metro Orlando. But homeowners in Tampa, Fort Lauderdale and Miami might be in for a rough time.”

Yup. Anywhere but here.

 
Comment by KIA
2006-06-23 09:21:38

I just received a foreclosure referral for a loan which was taken out January 31, 2006 for $525,000.00 + . It will now be foreclosed and I’ll bet a dollar that nobody wants the property at anywhere near the total debt. I’ll tell you, it’s unsettling to be foreclosing large loans which are only six months old. This sort of thing would never have happened back when there were lending standards in 2000-2002. ;)

Comment by hoz
2006-06-23 09:30:47

Since it appears the borrower never made a mortgage payment, Doesn’t the end lender have recourse against the Mortgage Lender?

Comment by KIA
2006-06-23 17:46:39

Whoever’s holding the bag (Note) when the music stops has a complaint for sure. Unfortuantely, smart sellers would have endorsed the Note “without recourse” so they’re no longer on the hook. They may need to go all the way back to the buyer and look at whether the loan app was fraudulent to avoid a discharge in bankruptcy. Not pretty.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-06-23 09:44:42

Thats probably one of those fraud deals where the buyer and seller were in it together. This is why you simply cannot buy at these prices. We’re just seeing the tip of the iceberg at this point.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-23 11:13:56

Yep txchick ,I think its one of those ,never intended to make any payments ,take the money and run ,buyer and seller in on it foreclosure.

Comment by KIA
2006-06-23 17:47:51

Not really sure what money these folks would have achieved. Like any flipper, they were planning on selling the property to a greater fool, only the music stopped and their lies were beyond their means.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-24 06:40:14

Kia ….Usually when you don’t see even a attempt to make one payment on a new purchase or refinance , some sort of fraud is involved .Sometimes it’s a husband taking the equity out and taking off with the maid .

 
 
 
 
Comment by mrincomestream
2006-06-23 10:07:47

Nah, I disagree those sorts of things always happen. Lending standards or no lending standards. It’s just now they are going to be super amplified because pricing is so out of wack. But if it foreclosed within 6 mo’s look like some broker just bought a house.

 
 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-06-23 09:29:26

Isn’t everyone on this blog scared about how seriously in the bag our whole media industry is? ???? I mean I feel like we are in Russia.

Comment by hoz
2006-06-23 10:01:12

I don’t think the media is evasive or failing. The housing bubble collapse is not going to happen like the stock market collapse and lose 300 points in an hour. It is not glamorous and is essentially boring if you are not a bubble market player. For long time readers of this blog, forecasts from 2 years ago are just starting to occur. Yet even with such a non glamorous story (Home Builders Stock increases by 4.7%), there are articles every day in the US as well as International press - including Russia see MoscowTimes.com.
(Which reminds me of an old joke, An American and a Russian are talking about their respective countries and the American says “In the US we have Freedom of speech. I can go to the gates of the White House and yell “George Bush sucks!” and not get in trouble. The Russian says “In Russia we have Freedom of speech also, I can go up to Red Square and yell “George Bush sucks!” and not get in trouble either!”

Comment by Chip
2006-06-23 18:41:20

Hoz — this blog is not 2 years old yet, as I recall. Correct me if I’m wrong (or Ben, if you have time) — I thought it started right around January 2005.

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-24 00:04:59

Chip,

You are right. This blog was started in around Dec 2004, but no comments until around Feb/Mar, IIRC. However, some of the posters here were on other blogs which existed prior to Ben’s (including Vegas Gal/LV Landlord, I might add; she’s been around for a while). Hoz might have been referring to the same characters, but from prior blogs/boards.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hoz
2006-06-24 07:45:16

There are other bubble blogs that have been posting since 1999 - Just most do not deal with just Housing bubbles but with Asset Bubbles which unfortunately includes housing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 06:29:18

HOZ:

Everyone is a bubble player unless they are homeless. That alone makes it a compelling story!

Yeah, the media is lazy and spineless.

Comment by Hoz
2006-06-24 07:41:06

LOL! Too True, What I meant by a bubble player is an investor in bubble markets as in the stock market, art, commodities, etc. Housing should never have been allowed to become a bubble market and that is a crime of the bubble economy the US has become.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by huggybear
2006-06-23 11:30:07

M.B.A. - I think your comment refers to how scared we should be because the media seems to have lost its journalistic integrity? If that’s what you mean then I agree.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-23 18:44:14

M.B.A. — whether by Providence or other, the Internet has (temporarily at least) set us free. Do you personally know well any people who think for themselves and also get their news from the media and not, in whole or in at least 50% part, from the Internet?

 
 
Comment by memphis
2006-06-23 10:07:57

Agreed, and by the time this is over, we will be sick to death of hearing the talking heads assign scapegoats. Meteorologists forecast, news readers describe the picture in the rear view mirror.

 
Comment by samk
2006-06-23 10:56:07

Why you should buy my house from Newsday.com:

Someone posted a link yesterday and today is the first of this series.

http://newsday.mycapture.com/mycapture/enlarge.asp?userphoto=1&image=4790&thispage=1

Comment by Mort
2006-06-24 08:19:51

Commercial clam diggers? Well, they going to have to dig up quite a few more clams to right that ship. She’s listing to starboard and takin’ on water in heavy seas. Arg! Avast there, ye landlubbers, scoundrels, why don’t ye buy me domicile?

 
Comment by LIrenter
2006-06-24 09:54:35

wow, very persuasive. and we should buy this house because..??

don’t think so.

 
 
Comment by gt
2006-06-23 11:01:49

DC craigslist, lately been about 250 when searching for “reduced”. now 416.

of course you can search reduction, closing, other hot words for a cool market

 
Comment by MeShell
2006-06-23 11:55:08

Samk-
Did you see that other house on the street that was sold in September and is re-listed for 675k!?!?! Unbelievable.

 
Comment by motorcityjim
2006-06-23 12:34:40

Did anybody catch Primetime Live last night? It profiled sociopath Mark Unger, a guy from Michigan who killed his wife when she tried to divorce him. He tried to cover up the crime but the police investigators were too smart and tore holes in his story. He was convicted of first degree murder.

His occupation? Mortgage broker. Killing his wife was like putting an unsuspecting FB into a suicide loan just so he could get a fat commission check. Attempting to cover up the crime by moving the body and fabricating a story was like using fake appraisals and comps, and lying about the loan terms.

I know, not all mortgage brokers are sociopaths who would hurt others for personal gain. Just most of them :)

Comment by Joe
2006-06-25 05:17:23

Ridiculous analogy.

 
 
Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-06-23 17:01:32

OK, I finally made a donation to Ben after all the time I’ve spent reading “sane buyers” posts.

Haven’t yet? It’s your turn! Log into PayPal and send to:

ben262@hotmail.com

Comment by Chip
2006-06-23 18:48:39

Great fund-raising idea. I did. Mozo Maz — I often make the mistake of cheerleading late in the day, after many readers have moved on to other activities. I think your call to “pledge,” if duplicated and at the start of a blog day, will not offend anyone in the least and might generate an even better outcome.

 
 
Comment by Phx Tim
2006-06-23 17:22:26

http://phoenix.craigslist.org/apa/174682797.html

Came across this gem of a post while hunting for a rental house. I wouldn’t trust this guy to make my burger, let alone with my personal info.

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-06-24 05:31:10

Haha, his spelling and typing skills are about on par with “419 scam” e-mail from Nigeria.

Comment by david cee
2006-06-25 08:57:12

How IS the real estate market in Nigeria???

 
 
Comment by robin
2006-06-24 18:27:55

Yeah, pretty eloquent!

 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 06:06:38

For the OC readers (Auction and C&C):

Lansner has another interview with another bubble denier.

I don’t think my post will make it up on his site but here is my post.

Hmm, we are awash in liquidity.

Isn’t that one of the conditions of a bubble?

The RE center at Pomona derives its funding from the RE industry.

Sponsoring Members
B of A
FNC
First American Real Estate Solutions
Wells Fargo

Sustaining Members
Dataquick
Fannie Mae
Grubb & Ellis
Marcus and Milchap
Option One Mortgage
Washington Mutual
Weyerhauser

What do you think he was going to say?

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” — Upton Sinclair

Jon, nice softball questions are you a journalist or playing pattycake?

Let’s try some real questions:

Why don’t median-income-to-home-price ratios matter anymore?

Why don’t rent-to-home-price ratios matter any more?

What about the So Cal’s taste for exotic mortgages with 2 Trillion resetting next year?

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 07:48:29

Well, I have to eat my words. Jon published my comments unedited.

Jon, we know you lurk here or someone on your staff does, thanks for publishing it, now how about asking the tought questions of these RE experts?

OR interview someone in a finance or economics background that doesn’t derive a paycheck from RE on the fundamentals of the housing market.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-25 07:03:56

Jon published my post last week unedited and in spite of my bearish statements . In fact I rang the alarm bell and he published it . I was surprised .

 
 
 
Comment by MC_White
2006-06-24 06:29:39

From MarketWatch:

=

‘Housing is the key

The rosy 3% scenario is based on economists’ best guesses that housing will slow, but not collapse, and that consumers will be able to keep spending at a healthy rate, bolstered by decent wage gains. Capital spending by businesses is expected to fill some of the gap left by housing.

The danger, of course, is that growth might be much weaker than 3% if housing prices fall rather than just level off, or if energy prices go higher, or if wages continue to stagnate, or if the dollar collapses. Or if the Fed overtightens.

“The risks are on the downside,” said Robert McGee, chief economist for U.S. Trust, who says the dangers of a housing collapse are underappreciated.

Housing was the pillar of strength in the economy for the past four years, contributing not only to investment but also to employment and to consumer spending. Deutsche Bank figures about 2 million of the 5 million jobs created since 2002 were related to the housing boom. The Fed figures that income from mortgage equity extraction increased from about 3% of personal incomes to about 7%, adding trillions of dollars to consumers’ spending and allowing the personal savings rate to fall into negative territory.

All that growth was based on ever-higher home prices. But now home prices are leveling off. Even assuming a gentle slowdown, the housing sector will be a significant drag on growth, employment and spending.

A few people think home prices could actually fall nationwide.
“The outlook for home prices is much worse than the consensus thinks,” said Anirvan Banerji, director of research at the Economic Cycle Research Institute. Banerji said the ECRI’s leading index of home prices is flashing warnings that real home prices (adjusted for the rise in consumer prices) could fall.

“We’ll have a harder landing than people expect,” Banerji said.’

Comment by MC_White
2006-06-24 06:34:49

The above article is entitled “Bernanke’s risky business” and can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/o32vl

The key quote in this article is the comment about the increase in “income” from mortgage equity extraction. 7% of personal income can be traced to HELOC borrowing? Holy $hit, batman.

 
 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2006-06-24 08:43:26

Today’s silly sales tactic from Craigslist SD.
A ‘tour’ of several homes for sale with a free progressive dinner along the way! Loan officers standing by!

$769000 - OPEN HOUSE TODAY 1-4 P.M. 3BR/2BA, in El Cerrito, Food Served

Please join us for a 6 home Open House Tour on Saturday, June 24th from 1-4 p.m.
There will be Progressive Mexican Style Buffet beginning at Home #1, and ending at Home # 6. All the homes are located in the El Cerrito area.

OPEN HOUSE TOUR

Home #1 4658 55th Street
Home #2 5470 Collier Street
Home #3 4634 56th Street
Home #4 5765 Adams Ave
Home #5 4626 60th Street
Home #6 6155 Estelle Street

Would you like some desperation with your enchiladas?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2006-06-25 03:04:26

Wonder how many of the tour-and-graze crowd are going to end up taking a dump at Home #6?

Comment by Know Nothin About Buyin No House
2006-06-25 08:23:51

lol

 
 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-06-24 09:31:13

Here is a weekend topic suggestion:

Why does the general population believe housing prices going up is good?

What if you went into your favorite store and found prices had tripled from 2001?

Would you be elated?

Comment by Brad
2006-06-24 16:21:07

the same people say that gas prices going up is bad. Hey, just buy some Exxon stock and be happy! Oh I forgot, you have to pay cash money for the stock, no 100% financing.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-06-25 07:08:17

Good topic Sunsetbeachguy .I guess people like Ponzi schemes they can get in on .

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:39:16

“Why does the general population believe housing prices going up is good?”

Because over 2/3 own one already. You only need to buy a home once a decade or so — not like the tomatoes you buy from your favorite store. And the house is an investment — you get to resell it later on, and if its value doubled over the time you live there, you get to pocket up to $500,000 in tax-free gains. And very bad stuff goes down when home prices fall (e.g., last time they fell throughout the US was during the Great Depression, and there is a serious chicken-and-the-egg question regarding which was the cause and which was the effect).

So the answer to your question seems like a no-brainer to me. Too bad that if home prices get artificially inflated beyond the value dictated by fundamental considerations, they have a tendancy to subsequently fall.

 
 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2006-06-24 09:52:45

Here’s a Craigslist poster who bought at the top of the SD market back in June of 2004. This owner/agent now wants his 2 year capital gains exemption and an extra $541,331 of your money over what he paid for the then new house. What a deal!

$1550000 - Dream Home in Encinitas Ranch

Built in 2004
Small yard. No View.
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/174792223.html

And the County Assessor’s Office says:
This little agent paid just $1,008,669 in June ‘04

Keep dreaming buddy.

Comment by Tulkinghorn
2006-06-25 07:54:19

“designer paint”?

 
 
Comment by Polestar
2006-06-24 10:24:53

Japanese RE ad…. funny if you are a golfer.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/44447/need_more_room/

Comment by CA renter
2006-06-24 14:59:34

LOL! That is funny. :)

 
 
Comment by Polestar
2006-06-24 10:29:48

Ok, these are weird!!

Found this Metacafe site awhile ago and just put in “RE” or “house” to find these.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/52989/cool_and_strange_houses/

 
Comment by homoaner
2006-06-24 14:36:12

I was thunderstruck to read the following piece of advice given to an underwater speculator at the SDCIA forum:

“However, if you ARE NOT personally responsible for the loan, I’d suggest the following approach. Deed the property over to somebody who does not care about their credit report. Perhaps a minor, a derelict, a very elderly person who never buys on credit, somebody else who does not care. Make sure that you “sales agreement” makes you responsible for the ownership expenses so you will be able to deduct them from your taxes. Then rent out the property for as much rent as you can. After a few months, stop paying the mortgage and let the property go to foreclosure. Later you have “credible deniability” for the loan. That is, you can explain to credit granters that you were not responsible for the new owner’s having defaulted on the loan.”

Un-bleepin’-believable. Get a minor or a senior citizen to sign a paper and take over your problem, while you walk away whistling. Nice set of ethics these a$$holes have.

 
Comment by txchick57
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-06-25 08:22:43

All eyes should be on China.
* They hold a lot of the junk debt.
* They are facing a pension crisis worse than ours.
* Their housing bubble is worse than ours
* Their economy is highly dependent on exports-U.S. consumers buying their cheap goods; U.S. consumers will be buying less of their stuff as the economy slows.

When China busts so will the housing market-badly
..my 2 cents

Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 08:29:53

“They are facing a pension crisis worse than ours.”

This is one area where a totalitarian regime can solve the problem a lot more quickly and efficiently than ours. “Pension? What pension, comrade? The People need your sacrifice, comrade! That’s good, comrade, very good — we knew you’d understand.”

Comment by arlingtonva
2006-06-25 08:43:42

Some of the people I know and work with are from China. They don’t consider it communist or democratic-simply capitalist. The ones I know have little interest in politics, but lots of interest in stocks, RE, investments etc. They say just in the last 10 years it has changed dramatically-local elections, more ownership, free trade, etc.

Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 13:38:17

Agreed — but they do not call the shots when the pension funds go under — the government will and it will not be touchy-feely like in the U.S. Any citizen of the PRC who believes otherwise is foolish, IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 13:43:20

Oh, and whether or not they consider China a Communist government, it most definitely is. Suggest you read up on I suggest that your colleagues propose, to their leaders, a replacement for the hammer and sickle in their national flag, for starters.

Please read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_China

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sigalarm
2006-06-25 12:08:35

It will be interesting to see if we have problems first or China. I think (and people who are really good at this can correct me) that the situation we have at hand is unprecedented in our recorded history. On the good side we have the means to record these events so that our children might avoid it.

Thankfully, due to vigilance and a spot of good luck, we have not had the El Queso terrorists pull any crap using shipping containers yet. Shut down the Pacific Conveyor and the US / China co-dependency would come apart.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 18:07:15

The nature of the symbiosis suggests our economic fates (US & CH) are inextricably linked…

 
 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-06-25 08:37:55

8 month and 10 month supply of housing in Northern Virginia.
YoY declines in SFH in Loudon and condos in Arlington.

See stats here:
http://www.virginiamls.com/charts/

Comment by ml in fl
2006-06-25 15:09:53

just heard from a broker in FL that there is no bubble as they only have 18months of supply. When I asked when this last happened I was told never.

 
 
Comment by Ultimate Warrior
2006-06-25 08:58:47
Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 13:52:13

Timberrrrrr!

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 17:40:13

“Seven years ago to the month, the typical house in the Sarasota-Bradenton market would have cost you about $128,100.

Now, at the tail end of a price run-up that nearly tripled that value, you can get $120,000 knocked off a home just to entice you to buy.”

This is a Famous & Barr Company “sale.” Mark the price up by 200%, then tell your customers you are having a 33%-off sale.

 
 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2006-06-25 10:17:58

Look at this sudden spike of Bay Area rentals on Patrick.net.

http://www.patrick.net

My friend who just rented out a place last week (he doesn’t play financial games, he would have been renting it out regardless of what the market was like) confirmed that the rental market in the area is red hot. Why so many renters all of the sudden? And what caused things to spike this way? I wonder if I can email this to Ben Bernanke for any last minute adjustment of the CPI before any final decision as to interest rate hikes.

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-06-25 12:56:00

My Guess? People are wising up that buying is a bad idea. So they are renting. More demand with constant supply == rising rent.

Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 13:55:38

“More demand with constant supply == rising rent.”

That is true. But the supply will not remain constant. Think “bleeding flippers.” The supply will rise a LOT in the next 2-3 years, IMO, but short-term — the next 12 months — rents quite possibly could rise. Solution for renters: max 12-month lease.

 
 
 
Comment by jack
2006-06-25 10:41:43

I am an appraiser in Orlando and had a meeting today with the president of a homeowners association in our area. They are having us estimate the cost to replace the common elements for the new Citizens insurance company owned by the state of Florida. Their insurance rates are tripling. During the meeting he stated that he has tearful owners in his office everyday crying about the fact that they cannot sell their mobile homes for $200k plus. He said that they are threatening to just dump them and go back home. He is fearful of this as it will impact on the other 75% of the full time residents. Not only will it hammer the home values but they will have to assess the other owners for the loss in monthly fee income which is going thru the roof. These are retirees and they may not be able to handle the increases. Now this is a modest mobile home community. Imagine what it is like in a highrise condo on the coast where fees are quadrupling for insurance alone.

Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 13:30:36

Jack — I’m also an Orlandoan. I don’t understand where the $200K plus number comes from, unless the mobile home owners assume that they will need $200K to buy equivalent brick and mortar living space. They still have the option of renting and, before long, there will be a lot of condos for rent in Florida’s bubble areas, especially South Florida, for rent at great rates. Or they can sell their mobile home and rent one, including in an inland area that doesn’t have the big insurance rate increase. Or they can move to an area that they can afford to live in, as I likely will have to do.

No one will be happy to see these people displaced, but neither is anyone else responsible to see that it doesn’t happen. If the insurance is relative to the risk, the unfortunate mobile home owners to whom you refer are living in the wrong place in the wrong part of the century. Someday the same will be true for a lot of Californians. We are guaranteed only death and taxes — no one has a “right” to live in any particular place at any particular time if they cannot, or can no longer, afford to do so.

Comment by michael
2006-06-25 16:08:25

The insurance thing is pretty tough and reminds me of that call for national home insurance here a few days ago (don’t remember the article it went with). But I’d guess that insurance companies would raise rates wherever they could to make up for losses in Florida. Or just plain get out of the state.

Someone has to pay for the risk and the folks inland don’t want to pay for the folks near the coasts. The folks with private insurance don’t think that it’s fair for the state to bail out Citizens.

Insurance is a funny thing. It allows us to take risks that we otherwise wouldn’t take because we can avoid very big consequences. But it also allows us to offload some of our risky decisions on other people.

Comment by Chip
2006-06-25 18:08:04

Michael — I don’t remember any call on this blog for “national home insurance,” but if there was such, it was by an individual or two. I feel confident in saying that most of Ben’s bloggers, at least the year+ ones, would not/not support such an idea.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2006-06-25 23:22:11

Chip,

I believe there was a link to an article which suggested national insurance.

Personally, I’m mixed about it. On one hand, I completely disagree with building on beaches (on either coast, as long-term Malibu residents can attest). Just too many risks. Also, I believe beach areas should be open to the public — just MHO.

That being said, how many places have no risk? Hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornados, etc. exist almost everywhere in the U.S. I’m a big fan of insurance, as it enables us to be more resilient as a society, IMHO.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 12:41:18

Would this be a good time to invest in Las Vegas? (LV Landlord — please read this article and give us your opinion, which is sorely missed as of late…)

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060625/news_1h25vegas.html

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-06-25 13:01:09

In today’s LATimes business section, the Donald T. Sterling Corporation announced two new credit facilities “For Acquisition of Real Property in Sounthern California and Nevada”. The two facilities add up to $775,000,000.

Based on past history, my guess is that they’re planning to buy high-end rental properties. Or maybe take out a bunch of condos and convert them to rentals. Just guesswork on my part.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2006-06-25 13:00:49

LV Landlord is AWOL — do they still have debtors’ prisons? If not, I’m guessing she’s undergoing some serious, long-term, in-residence pyschiatric treatment as her shattered delusions have left her in a near-vegetative state. Remember, LV Landlord: Don’t make the mistake of assuming the State Psychiatrist is your friend….

Comment by GetStucco
2006-06-25 17:26:29

D’ya think LV Landlord and BeaConst went into hiding together?

 
 
Comment by DAVID
2006-06-25 21:04:44

Just got finished watching the CNBC realestate survival guide. Is it me or was that just another propaganda machine for the national realator association.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post