November 4, 2015

Self-Delusion Is Common During Bubbles

The Province reports from Canada. “In a recent six-month period about 70 per cent of all detached homes sold on Vancouver’s west side were purchased by Mainland China buyers, an academic case study shows. Even more stunning, the study shows that of all self-declared occupations among owners — on homes worth an average $3.05 million — 36 per cent were housewives or students with little income. And 18 per cent of the 172 homes purchased were not mortgaged by banks. That means roughly $100 million in questionable cash was poured into Vancouver’s west side from August 2014 to February 2015, much of it from China. Total value of all homes sold in the study period was $525 million.”

“David Eby, the NDP MLA for Vancouver-Point Grey, told The Province he helped city planner and researcher Andy Yan undertake the B.C. land-title study because many of his Vancouver west side constituents have complained about hollowed-out neighbourhoods, absentee investors, property flipping, and suspicions of money laundering and unfair tax avoidance. Eby said the study fills a data gap in Vancouver and ‘bears out the anecdotal feelings that people have about Mainland China buyers.’ ‘We’re still at the point where we won’t even admit we have an issue, while other jurisdictions have studied this or taken action,’ Eby said. ‘It’s my hope this data shows that this money has a profound influence.’”

“‘When you see all the homemakers and students on the titles buying $3-million homes with mortgages, it really supports the idea that money from somewhere else is coming in,’ Eby said. ‘The questions that come up for me are: China is an authoritarian state that has lots of issues with corruption. Is the money coming into Vancouver the kind we want to be encouraging? And are we doing everything we can to make sure we leverage this investment to benefit British Columbians as much as possible? Or is this just benefiting the super-car dealerships on Burrard Street?’”

The Montreal Gazette. “A red flag has been raised on Montreal’s housing market in the latest Housing Market Assessment from the CMHC. Weak growth in demand from first-time home buyers, relatively modest growth in disposable income, and a glut of completed and unsold condos are among the factors cited by the CMHC in the strong evidence of over-valuation. In the condo market, where there is a lot of supply and it is a buyer’s market, there could be price decreases if economic conditions deteriorate.”

“The report states that management of inventory is necessary to ensure the current high number of condos under construction does not remain unsold when completed. Steps in the right direction were reported this week, with housing starts to drop significantly in 2015 — 26 per cent in the condo market this year — before picking up slightly in 2016 and 2017. ‘What’s encouraging is that we’re seeing builders slowing down the pace of new condo projects this year. That will help to absorb units in inventory or under construction,’ said David L’Heureux, principal analyst for Montreal with the CMHC. ‘We’re still going to monitor it closely because there is still a lot of supply to be absorbed.’”

The Financial Post. “For landlords there’s no denying it: Apartment renters are in the driver’s seat like never before, with the situation most obvious in Alberta where vacancy rates have spiked. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.’s October rental report showed that vacancy rates have risen to 3.5 per cent nationally, from 3 per cent a year earlier, for purposed-built units (buildings with three or more apartments). For condominium units, rented out by investors, the national vacancy rate jumped from 1.6 per cent to 2.3 per cent.”

“Nowhere is the situation more dire than in the energy dependent provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Alberta’s vacancy rate jumped to 5.6 per cent from 2.1 per cent for purpose-built units while Saskatchewan’s rose to 6.8 per cent from 4.1 per cent. ‘It’s the outcome of a weakened economy,’ said John Dickie, president of the Canadian Federation of Apartment Associations. ‘Alberta is a tenant’s market. I’d be negotiating on a renewal. I’d be seeing if there’s any softness in the asking rent.’”

“Even in Toronto’s still strong housing market there are some signs of weakness. The condominium apartment vacancy rate rose to 1.8 per cent in October from 1.3 per cent a year earlier while the average rental rate for a two-bedroom condo unit fell to $1,754 a month from $1,818 a year earlier.”

From CBC News. “Once a landlord’s paradise, Calgary’s rental-housing market has become a tenant’s dream — at least when it comes to what’s available. The city’s vacancy rate has nearly quadrupled in the span of just one year, according to the fall Rental Market Survey from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Calgary’s vacancy rate stood at 5.3 per cent in October, according to the survey, up from 1.4 per cent in fall 2014.”

“‘The rise in the national vacancy rate was due to lower net migration in regions most affected by low oil prices as well as an increase in the supply of purpose-built rental apartment units,’ chief economist Bob Dugan said in a release.”

From 660 News. “Gerry Baxter with the Calgary Residential Rental Association said that he knew it was up with all of the out-migration happening, but this is bigger than anticipated. ‘Right now, it’s a tenant market because there’s an abundance of vacant units across the city,’ Baxter told 660 NEWS. ‘Most people that I speak with today are certainly not looking to increase rents. In fact, many of them have actually reduced their rents to try and attract clientele or customers to their buildings. So many people have left the province, again. We went through this back in 2008 and 2009, but not quite as severe as what we’re seeing today.’”

The Calgary Herald. “The average MLS sale price of homes in Calgary in October had the biggest year-over-year drop in value this year and total dollar volume for the year is now down by about a staggering $3 billion. October was the 10th straight month that average sale prices have dropped from the year before in the city. In October, they fell by 6.1 per cent to $457,513 – the lowest average sale price of any month this year. It is also the lowest monthly price since December 2013. October also was the 11th straight month of year-over-year sales declines, falling by 33.3 per cent to 1,421 transactions. It was the lowest level for an October since 2011.”

“‘The plummeting house prices are indeed a reaction to the declining provincial economy. Real Estate fundamentals show the relationship between the GDP, jobs, and people. As the economy improves, jobs are created and people move to the area, putting upward pressures on vacancy, rents, and values. The opposite is also true,’ said Melanie Reuter, director of research with the Real Estate Investment Network.”

“Year-over-year, MLS sales fell by 32.4 per cent in the detached city market, by 30.9 per cent in the attached market and by 38.9 per cent in apartments. Average sale prices also declined in all three categories – 7.3 per cent for detached; 6.9 per cent for attached; and 1.5 per cent for apartments.”

“‘Persistent weakness in the overall economy continued to impact housing demand in Calgary as October sales were nearly 16 per cent below long-term averages,’ said Ann-Marie Lurie, CREB’s chief economist. ‘In addition, new listings did not decline enough to prevent inventory gains and, ultimately, price contractions.’”

The Daily Observer. “Saturday was Halloween, and children were saying ‘trick or treat’ as they helped themselves to some candy. As Halloween happens but once a year and involves sweets, trick-or-treating is seen as harmless fun. By contrast, the trick-or-treating (or, more accurately, trick-and-treating) that has come to shape the Canadian economy is likely to end in tears. For the past 15 years the financial system has been busy performing the one trick it knows - expanding the quantity of money and credit - on an ever-grander scale.”

“Today, Canadians are among the most indebted people on earth. Much of the money borrowed by Canadians was used to buy real estate. As billions of dollars flooded into the property market, prices rose markedly. To understand the risks associated with rising debt levels which both support and are supported by rising asset prices, it is helpful to have a look at something Charlie Munger (Warren Buffet’s business partner) has dubbed ‘the febezzle’ or ‘functionally equivalent bezzle.’”

“The Canadian economist John Kenneth Galbraith coined the term ‘the bezzle’ to describe the increase in imagined wealth that results from embezzlement. As the economist John Kay put it in his recent article entitled ‘The Bezzle Years’ - ‘The joy of the bezzle is that two people - each ignorant of the other’s existence and role - can enjoy the same wealth.’ Munger’s febezzle does not depend upon criminal embezzlement but rather upon self-delusion of the kind that is common during market bubbles. Credit-fuelled asset bubbles create a great deal of illusory wealth.”

“So long as the illusion is maintained, though, everyone can experience the joy of the febezzle. In the case of a housing bubble, existing homeowners can borrow against and spend the gains resulting from higher home prices, the banks can increase lending, earn record profits and pay their employees large bonuses and the government can collect higher property taxes and development fees.”

“However, it is good to keep in mind that the houses themselves have not changed. Fundamentally, the increases in income and spending that are attributed to rising home prices are in fact the result only of increased borrowing and rising debt. Long after the joy of the febezzle is a distant memory, the debts incurred by households against their homes will remain. Unhappily for many, the apparent treat of rising home prices resulting from the trick of expanding the quantity of money and credit will be revealed to have been just another trick.”




RSS feed

43 Comments »

Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2015-11-04 04:17:21

Sacramento, CA Foreclosures Skyrocket 49%

http://www.capradio.org/57264

Comment by taxpayers
2015-11-04 09:17:09

is that jingle or rental king
I get them confused

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 13:12:57

Debt Donkeys all look the same after a while.

 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-11-04 04:48:35

“‘The questions that come up for me are: China is an authoritarian state that has lots of issues with corruption. Is the money coming into Vancouver the kind we want to be encouraging? And are we doing everything we can to make sure we leverage this investment to benefit British Columbians as much as possible? Or is this just benefiting the super-car dealerships on Burrard Street?’”

The same question about money coming in from somewhere else into Vancouver could also be asked about such places as, say, Aspen.

The people of Aspen - ALL the people of Aspen - benefit directly or indirectly from money coming in from the outside; This money that comes in from the outside, money that comes from someplace else, is what makes Aspen work, and it’s what makes Vancouver work.

If you want to see an example of a place that used to work because of money flowing in from the outside then suddenly stopped working because the money flow was shut off then go here:

https://www.google.com/search?q=bodie+ca&biw=1360&bih=643&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAmoVChMI0MfS2dj2yAIVF_VjCh2LqwAQ

These people of Vancouver who bitch because of all the wealth that gets transferred into their city can’t really be serious. If they really are serious then they are fools.

Comment by snake charmer
2015-11-04 08:19:41

Does the wealth coming into Aspen have a foreign criminal origin? Is it the product of looting or money laundering? I can’t agree with the comparison. The people of Vancouver who are bitching are those who don’t benefit from the hyper-bubble caused by corrupt foreign cash, which is to say, most of them. The city was able to function economically without dirty Chinese money for 125 years and I don’t believe it would turn into Bodie if that flow ceased.

One seldom-discussed aspect of globalization is that the effects of elite crime have now become global.

Comment by In Colorado
2015-11-04 09:08:27

They need not bitch, as the incoming money flow will come to an end of its accord. Then we will be regaled with stories of financial calamity in Vancouver as housing prices collapse and there is a tsunami of foreclosures, straining banks and other mortgage lenders.

 
 
Comment by Anonymous
2015-11-04 09:30:13

How is an 18th century mining town comparable to a big, long-lived metropolis like Vancouver?

There are countless “ghost towns” around the west and they all have the same story. They popped up almost overnight when some gold, silver, etc. was found nearby. They existed solely to serve the mines and miners. Then when the mines proved unprofitable or played out, the towns emptied just as quickly. In many cases, this all played out in just a few years.

Comment by redmondjp
2015-11-04 11:50:05

Exactly. Williston, ND is the modern-day equivalent, although it will probably never get down to population zero.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2015-11-04 10:22:23

These people of Vancouver who bitch because of all the wealth that gets transferred into their city can’t really be serious. If they really are serious then they are fools.”

Same with the US because the dollar is the worlds reserve currency.

Not just cash also skilled workers. And unskilled, they all show up here to work makes the US wealthier, well some people more than others.

 
Comment by Patrick
2015-11-04 12:04:34

Sample size 172, most paid cash. Actual market hundreds of thousands.

Vancouverites are not foolish - they know they cannot wander from their current home and worry about their kid’s abilities to stay in town.

Canadians will suffer from abuse by outsiders for only so long - and these prices are an abuse of our system -

How can we allow a sample of 172 units to decide the municipal tax base, the civic employee’s remuneration, your families domicle?

 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2015-11-04 05:07:30

“So long as the illusion is maintained, though, everyone can experience the joy of the febezzle. In the case of a housing bubble, existing homeowners can borrow against and spend the gains resulting from higher home prices, the banks can increase lending, earn record profits and pay their employees large bonuses and the government can collect higher property taxes and development fees.”

“… gains resulting from higher home prices …”

Higher home prices translate to higher home values, a clear case whereby Price equals Value.

The prices are voted up by the decisions of the buyers and the sellers which means the so-called values are voted up by these buyers and sellers.

Fundamentals are then set aside and ignored while the price rise takes over because the change in fundamentals can’t keep up with the change in the price; If you are going to use fundamentals to gauge value then you are going to get out voted by those who use the price to gauge value.

For a while, at least. While the mania is going strong. But when the mania ends and the price is way, way far above by what can be justified by the fundamentals then look out below.

Comment by Combotechie
2015-11-04 05:27:35

“The prices are voted up by the decisions of the buyers and the sellers which means the so-called values are voted up by these buyers and sellers.”

Ooops, I left out an important part, the borrowed money part. The price can rise because money is made available due to borrowing to power the rise. If there is no money made available then there will be nothing to power the price rise.

Available money one part that is needed, the other part is willing borrowers. Not necessarily smart borrowers, just willing borrowers. Which brings up a famous quote:

“When you combine ignorance and borrowed money, the consequences can get interesting.” - Warren Buffett

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 05:33:31

“Ooops, I left out an important part, the borrowed money part. The price can rise because money is made available due to borrowing to power the rise. If there is no money made available then there will be nothing to power the price rise.”

Don’t forget, it’s the availability of borrowed money on easy terms which makes those rising prices affordable…then makes them rise further.

Comment by Combotechie
2015-11-04 05:51:45

“… affordable …”

Break down the high price into numerous parts that are stretched out over thirty-years-or-so and make each part doable (barely, barely doable) and - presto! - the high price is suddenly made affordable.

The problem is: The barely doable cost of paying for the part leaves little money left over for buying other stuff. So the solution the this situation is …

ta da

… more borrowing!

Since the price of the house has gone up the value of the equity has also gone up (see? price equals value) and this increased equity is something that can be borrowed against, so the homebuyer that can barely make ends meet due to the enormous amount of money that go into monthly payments on the house can make up for the shortfall by borrowing against the rising equity and once again he can enjoy endless prosperity!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2015-11-04 06:17:29

I’d be very interested to see how many 30 year mortgages actually go 30 years and get paid off. a lot of sh@t can happen in 30 years.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-11-04 07:11:23

Don’t hurt yourself Combo!

Honest money cannot compete with stupid borrowed money.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2015-11-04 08:12:56

Isn’t it interesting that Mel Watts and team have been slashing loan restrictions for a year, even as house prices go up? The incremental nature of it; why not just have a 100% increase in a month if houses are too low? Nah, that would be nuts! But we can have a loan fueled 7 or 8 or 20% a year increase, then again, and again. Now that’s what I call healthy!

I said yesterday; house prices should never go up like this. They didn’t for hundreds of years.

 
Comment by snake charmer
2015-11-04 08:25:03

Blue Skye, that is correct. One of the reasons I gave for not buying in the 2004-06 timeframe was that I’d be bidding against people who could borrow 100%, or even more than 100%, of the purchase price. That’s why reckless credit and easy money are such a distortion. My earned and saved dollars had no chance whatsoever against borrowed dollars.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 08:28:25

“I’d be bidding against people who could borrow 100%”

That hasn’t changed. The standard is and has been 3.5% down with downpayment assistance.

Remember…..3.5% downpayment mortgages are the definition of sub-prime.

 
Comment by Young Deezy
2015-11-04 09:15:26

Without getting too specific about what I do for a living, I’m seeing a lot of paperwork indicating buyers putting less than the 3.5% down. All the rhetoric about tighter lending standards since the end of the bubble have been total bs.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 09:19:34

That’s no surprise at all. DP assistance programs with all the extras in conjunction with 3.5% down mortgages result in >100% financing, i.e instantly underwater. This is the norm and has been all along.

Realtor?

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2015-11-04 09:56:39

http://www.bkfs.com/Data/DataReports/BKFS_MM_Sep2015_Report.pdf

See pages 8, 10 and 13

Page 8 shows that loans made before 2005 are becoming delinquent at a rate of about 1%. Loans made during 2005-2008 are still becoming delinquent at a high rate of 1.7%. Loans made 2009 and after are becoming delinquent at 0.3%.

Page 10 shows relatively few sub-700 FICO score loans, and that the weighted average FICO score purchase loans is the highest of the data set (which extends to early 2005).

Page 13 shows that people are obtaining 1-year ARMs with less frequency as time goes on, and 10-year ARMs with nmore frequency as time goes on.

You can draw your own conclusions from these pages, but they don’t seem indicative to me of a mortgage market that is giving money to less and less capable borrowers, nor does it seem indicative to me of borrowers taking out riskier and riskier loans in order to afford a home purchase.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 10:30:12

With foreclosure moratoriums in effect in all 50 states the data is meaningless.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2015-11-04 10:52:13

None of the data relates to foreclosures.

It relates to:

New DELINQUENCIES that were current 6 months ago;
FICO scores on purchase loans;
The type of ARMs that borrowers are obtaining (and lenders are making);

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2015-11-04 11:03:57

[not] “riskier and riskier loans”

It’s the price, not the FICO or the interest rate. The price is too high, so all these recent loans are subprime.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 11:04:55

Precisely. Delinquencies and foreclosures are set aside as a result of moratoriums in every state.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2015-11-04 21:46:35

Loans made 2009 and after are becoming delinquent at 0.3%.

RW: that sounds very low alright—but keep in mind, delinquencies were very very low during the go-go years of the previous bubble as well.

The proof is in the pudding; in other words, what happens to delinquencies when prices are not going up, up, up??

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-05 08:07:23

Understating delinquencies isn’t helpful to anyone.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 05:09:21

“‘When you see all the homemakers and students on the titles buying $3-million homes with mortgages, it really supports the idea that money from somewhere else is coming in,’ Eby said. ‘The questions that come up for me are: China is an authoritarian state that has lots of issues with corruption. Is the money coming into Vancouver the kind we want to be encouraging? And are we doing everything we can to make sure we leverage this investment to benefit British Columbians as much as possible? Or is this just benefiting the super-car dealerships on Burrard Street?’”

I’m curious how many years ago we first raised the issue of dirty Chinese money driving the Vancouver bubble. It was long ago, for certain.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 05:14:11

“‘The rise in the national vacancy rate was due to lower net migration in regions most affected by low oil prices as well as an increase in the supply of purpose-built rental apartment units,’ chief economist Bob Dugan said in a release.”

What is a non-purpose-built rental apartment unit, in contrast with the purpose-built variety?

Comment by Ben Jones
2015-11-04 08:02:20

Condos turned into apartments, SFH turned into rentals, etc.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 05:18:59

“The Canadian economist John Kenneth Galbraith coined the term ‘the bezzle’ to describe the increase in imagined wealth that results from embezzlement. As the economist John Kay put it in his recent article entitled ‘The Bezzle Years’ - ‘The joy of the bezzle is that two people - each ignorant of the other’s existence and role - can enjoy the same wealth.’ Munger’s febezzle does not depend upon criminal embezzlement but rather upon self-delusion of the kind that is common during market bubbles. Credit-fuelled asset bubbles create a great deal of illusory wealth.”

Galbraith must be splitting a gut over Canada’s housing bezzle from wherever he resides in the aftrelife.

Comment by redmondjp
2015-11-04 11:52:16

Ancient Chinese Proverb: He who wash rich man’s clothes, sometimes find money in pocket.

 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2015-11-04 05:19:06

My county voted for future higher taxes=stalled ‘re market

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 05:23:33

“However, it is good to keep in mind that the houses themselves have not changed. Fundamentally, the increases in income and spending that are attributed to rising home prices are in fact the result only of increased borrowing and rising debt. Long after the joy of the febezzle is a distant memory, the debts incurred by households against their homes will remain. Unhappily for many, the apparent treat of rising home prices resulting from the trick of expanding the quantity of money and credit will be revealed to have been just another trick.”

Tricks and traps are the hallmarks of a central banker’s financial utopia.

Comment by azdude
2015-11-04 06:18:46

when is walmart gonna roll out a 30 year?

Comment by taxpayers
2015-11-04 07:32:32

84 month car loans be happinin

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2015-11-04 07:54:47

Remember….. If you have to borrow for 48 to 84 months for a car, you can’t afford it nor is it affordable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Anonymous
2015-11-04 09:37:33

True, they are already providing “banking services” to a lot of people, they might as well take the next step and provide auto and home loans.

 
 
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2015-11-04 09:02:19

30,932 nearby properties found Dallas, TX Real Estate and Homes for Sale

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Dallas_TX?ml=4

8,774 nearby properties found Dallas, TX Price Reduced Homes for Sale

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Dallas_TX/show-price-reduced?ml=4

28% of Dallas sellers slashed their price at least once.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-04 17:48:25

“However, it is good to keep in mind that the houses themselves have not changed. Fundamentally, the increases in income and spending that are attributed to rising home prices are in fact the result only of increased borrowing and rising debt. Long after the joy of the febezzle is a distant memory, the debts incurred by households against their homes will remain.”

Isn’t this the point where short sales and federally tax-exempt mortgage debt forgiveness normally come into play?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-05 00:10:11

Speaking of self-delusion during bubbles, have you noticed how many folks can’t escape from the denial phase of dealing with their massive losses in the commodities bust?

Comment by Professor Bear
2015-11-05 00:16:00

Barron’s
Nov. 3, 2015 12:01 a.m. ET
How Low Can Gold Go?
By Isabella Zhong

Diwali, or the festival of lights, usually brings a gold rush to India as households splurge on jewelry and artifacts crafted from the precious metal. But, this year, gold hasn’t sparkled ahead of next week’s five-day holiday. The SPDR Gold Shares ETF (ticker: GLD) is down more than 4% over the past five trading days.

The yellow metal has been hurt by shifting expectations for the first hike in U.S. interest rates in a decade. The more hawkish than expected tone following last week’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee suggested a December tightening of monetary policy may be on the cards. Higher interest rates loom as bad news for the non-yielding metal as they make cash and fixed income investments look more appealing than gold. The gold price also tends to move in the opposite direction as the U.S. dollar, which would strength on higher interest rates.

The sharp downturn in the gold price, coupled with a stronger Australian dollar, has snapped a rally in Australian gold miners Northern Star Resources (NST.AU) and Evolution Mining (EVN.AU). Northern Star has tumbled 18% since the beginning of last week, while Evolution is down 14%. And there could be more pain ahead for the gold miners if analyst forecasts for the precious metal prove true.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post