January 4, 2016

Bits Bucket for January 4, 2016

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here. Please visit my Youtube channel which you can also find here:

http:tinyurl.com/http-hbb-com




RSS feed

249 Comments »

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 05:52:43

Will the first working day of the new year bring the return of Lola and the Pineapples?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 06:42:07

They never left, alas….

Comment by oxide
2016-01-04 08:04:23

Just returned from spending some off-time with rural conservative friends. Got to speak some Redneck and get some insight into their mindset. Main takeaways: they don’t like being nickeled and dimed by the smaller taxes and fees on stuff like water/sewers; major kudos to the Secret Service for keeping “that b@st@rd” alive because he’s been a real boon to the firearm industry; they think Trump is great but they are being realistic about this chances and prepping for President Hillary … by buying even more guns and prepper supplies.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 08:31:18

…waiting for the day when Jesus raptures away the infidels.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by wondering
2016-01-04 10:21:19

“Waiting” for the rapture is one thing. Actively trying to speed it up (i.e. Ben carson, Ted Cruz) is something else entirely.

 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2016-01-04 12:20:38

After the rapture, those of us who are left will suffer!

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 13:09:14

waiting for the day when Jesus raptures away the infidels.

Actually, the Evang/Fundy narrative is that the believers will be raptured away and the infidels will be left to suffer the tribulation with the Antichrist and Armageddon.

 
Comment by tangouniform
2016-01-04 14:47:44

There are some who’d say that the Rapture happened almost 8 years ago and the Antichrist wears many hats. Have you ever seen the Prez, the FED and duh Mayor of Chicago in the same room at the same time? Thought not…

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 20:20:15

Heinleins “Job: A Comedy of Justice” was what I needed to counteract all the BS from Christian fundies.

 
 
Comment by Ann Gogh
2016-01-04 08:36:44

Over here in rural oceanside my water bill is 151.00 a month and i live alone, I am watering 9 gopher bitten lawns and do my laundry once a month. My health insurance bill went from 739.00 every four months in 2009 up to 1750.00 for 4 months in 2016. I cost the government nothing yet i am paying for the 50% of californians who have no jobs!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-04 09:15:40

Don’t forget national security. The government spends a lot on the armed forces to keep you safe.

 
Comment by Ann Gogh
2016-01-04 09:26:29

most of the marines get to own or rent the finest homes in encinitas. Nobody is complaining about the armed forces!

 
Comment by cactus
2016-01-04 09:33:11

security yep I got jumped by 4 cop cars yesterday apparently someone matching my description was reported to be carrying a rifle around ..

that took about a hour of my life as they all surrounded me not really knowing what to do since I was just out walking, no rifle.

The main cop was Ok though he just didn’t get it why he was called out. I suggested people were scared and seeing things he agreed.

kingdom of fear

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 11:04:10

Ann - why do you chose to stay? So Cal is awful. Oceanside is horrible with your “temporary” residents from the base.

The Bush wars are expensive, someone has to pay the bills.

If you are retired, have you looked into Belize?

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 15:38:36

Everywhere poverty is raging in CA. It’s not just socal.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2016-01-04 17:33:28

Hi Ann! Miss ya! I can recommend Kansas. :D My water bill is decent, but electric is another story. But of course we do have to deal with this thing called rain every year (not just every 5 years) and sometimes even some snow. :D

Leaving CA was the best thing I ever did. And as a native I do resent not being able to afford what my parents could. But sunshine was never that important to me (although I do miss dog beach.)

I do hope that if Ben ever has a midwest meetup you’ll come out too. Like him, you’ll always have a place to stay. -S-

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 17:49:38

Mafia-aci - Ever been to Palo Alto? Carmel? Santa Barbara? St. helena? SLO? La Jolla? the richest people on the planet call these places home by choice. no one lives in upper NY by choice. How is your snow blower?

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 20:26:18

Hey Cactus. You are lucky you live to talk about it. Rest assured the cops put a ceiling on IQs of who they hire. Unfortunately for over 1000 dead Americans in 2015 that IQ li I is an upper limit.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-04 08:54:00

Oh, and I saw Star Wars too. I heard fanboys call it “the best” of the Star Wars, and in a strict cinematic sense of script, acting, design etc, that’s probably true. But yeah, it’s a plot retread.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-04 10:34:02

I had a date with a young lady to see “Alvin and the Chipmunks”. It was pretty good.

 
Comment by Biggvs_Richardvs
2016-01-04 15:35:19

Or as I like to call it, “You GO Wars!”

Name one (new) male character you would like to be like in that movie the way you did with Han Solo and Luke Skywalker in the previous movies.

Didn’t think so.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 10:55:49

Reagan tripled the deficit, someone has to pay.

Bush wars are expensive too.

If only we could export American Ignorance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-01-04 18:07:48

U go girl

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-04 09:25:29

the return of Lola and the Pineapples?

Conversely, have goon and the go-timers gone to help in the bird sanctuary takeover?

[Goon and the Go-timers would be a great name for a band.]

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 09:43:22

They’re fighting for Mining, Ranching, Logging, and recreation.

A building full of heavily armed twits is about to get smoked.

Comment by oxide
2016-01-04 11:01:53

Smoked as in tear-gassed? Probably. Won’t work. These guys are pretty well prepped with masks and such. Set on fire ala Waco? Doubtful.

I’d be interested in Ben’s take on this. These armed men are demanding the Federal lands be opened to The People, and Ben has expressed a similar opinion. These guys want the land for themselves, of course, but what if some blacklivesmatter hippies wanted to start a peace homestead on the land? Don’t they have as much right to the land as the Bundys do?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 12:43:53

Smoked as in blown to tiny bits that will then be burned to ash.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-04 14:38:21

“as the Bundys do”

Love that the Hammonds told the Bundy’s to bugger off. State’s rights! (or something)

 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-04 10:50:58

“[Goon and the Go-timers would be a great name for a band.]”

I saw them before they were cool.

 
Comment by Southern Poverty Call Center
2016-01-04 11:22:43

Nice narrative but I have better sh*t to do today:

http://i.imgur.com/SdcdJ2w.jpg

#SkiNowWorkLater

Region VIII

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 11:12:55

Lola doesn’t work. Not in the traditional sense.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 05:59:30

2banana’s Law:

Long term democrat rule + insane public unions + huge free sh*t army = misery, ruin and bankruptcy

Gawd help you if you won a house or a business in Chicago.

————————–

Escape From Chicago
Chicago: The mess that Democrats made.

January 1, 2016, Daniel Greenfield, Freedom Center

Chicago is on fire. It’s America’s mass shooting capital. Its deadliest neighborhoods are gang territories prowled by thousands of killers with some of the highest murder rates in the world.

So far, 442 people have been shot and killed in Chicago this year. 2,540 were shot and wounded. 2,982 were shot. Fewer Americans died fighting Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War than in a year in Chicago.

But in Chiraq, the devil is a Democrat. Chicago Democrats are closely entangled with its 68,000 gang members who deliver the votes and the money. There are more gang members in Chicago than people of English ancestry. That makes them a powerful voting bloc. And Democrats bow to their wishes.

A Latin Kings member described how the vote organizing worked. “Every chapter had to vote for that guy… That was a direct order. That means you can’t say no.” Under the Dems, that’s Chicago democracy.

Chicago Democrats ritualistically demand gun control, but carefully avoid cracking down on their own political base. Obama calls for “common sense solutions” after every shooting, but like a good Chicago Democrat he voted against a 1999 bill to try anyone carrying out a shooting in school as an adult. Under Obama, Federal gun-crime prosecutions in Chicago have became as rare as honest Chicago Democrats.

Chicago is a dead city. It was shot and killed generations ago. Now it’s just lying in a gutter and waiting to die. As in Detroit, Baltimore and so many other once promising cities, the killers were Democrats.

Rahm’s public school chief, whom he called “the best and the brightest”, pleaded guilty in a corruption scheme for accepting kickbacks while writing in an email that she needed money because she had “casinos to visit”. That was convenient because Rahm had been pushing for a city-owned casino to fund schools. But under Democratic Party corruption, school corruption funds casinos instead.

Rahm Emanuel had a simple job. In true Chicago style, his job was a con job.

The con was attracting enough prosperous young people to slow down the rate at which Chicago will go bankrupt. Chicago has a $63 billion debt. It will be paying off bonds from 1993 in 2039 for public housing that was already torn down. It’s no wonder that its bonds were downgraded to junk this year.

But the rich, young people who were supposed to bail out Chicago didn’t show up. Instead they left. Their top reasons for getting the hell out of Chicago included high taxes and lots of shootings.

So Rahm Emanuel piled on even more taxes on top of taxes. He taxed cable, hotels, cigarettes, parking in garages (it’s 22 percent on weekdays) cloud-computing services and Netflix. Water and sewer rates nearly doubled. And more companies left. Many of them blamed the rising taxes.

But his attempts at technocratic progressive tinkering with school reform at the expense of the powerful and greedy Chicago Teachers Union (the organization called a strike demanding a 30% raise) made the organization and its crazed head, Karen Lewis, into his enemies. Rahm Emanuel had also done such politically incorrect things as trying to lure companies to move to Chicago which earned him a 1% label.

The last Republican mayor of Chicago was born shortly after the Civil War. In his last year in office, the population of Chicago stood at around 3.4 million. A few years ago, the population fell to levels not seen in a century as the escape from Chicago continued.

Chicago’s population has been falling since the 50s. 200,000 fled between 2000 and 2010. Tens of thousands of homes stand vacant. In some neighborhoods 1 in 6 homes are empty. And with an underwater mortgage rate that hovers around 20 percent, they’ll soon have plenty of company.

Democrats killed Chicago’s future. All that’s left is a skeleton for the aldermen to pick apart, for the political machine to bankrupt and for activists to run against. It’s the same familiar cycle of Democratic rule that shrank the city, destroyed its economy, stole its jobs and drove away its families.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:51:10

“A Latin Kings member described how the vote organizing worked. “Every chapter had to vote for that guy… That was a direct order. That means you can’t say no.” Under the Dems, that’s Chicago democracy.”

This. Geez.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:09:22

Every single Democrat voter is corrupt. Every last one of them. You can’t vote for that kind of systemic sleaze and corruption and consider yourself an honest, moral person.

Comment by Biggvs_Richardvs
2016-01-04 15:47:14

Every single Democrat Republican voter is corrupt. Every last one of them. You can’t vote for that kind of systemic sleaze and corruption and consider yourself an honest, moral person.

Fixed that for you.

/Independent

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-04 10:34:52

There is a very good interview by Dan Proft (local radio talkie) with the great John Kass of the Trib on a site called upstream ideas.

Linky here: http://www.upstream-ideas.com/ideas/against-the-current-john-kass/

I listened to it for a second time over the weekend. And Kass - given his 3 decades of following Chicago and ILLANNOY politics on a daily basis and writing continuously about it on page 2 of the Trib for the last 20 years provides interesting insights. If you plan to move here - don’t - you won’t like it.

Comment by Middle Coaster
2016-01-04 13:47:08

John Kass? Great? That guy is a wannabe right wing Mike Royko and failing miserably at it. And he isn’t funny, although he thinks he is.

Rex Huppke is hilarious, cutting, and in a just world would have Kass’s prized page 2 spot. Maybe soon he will.

Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-04 15:20:53

Nah - Huppke - Kass is still his better -
The interview is worth a look.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 11:06:10

No complaints from Marin County, CA.

I blame a certain race, not liberals.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-04 11:47:07

You blame an entire race of people for the decline in Chicago’s population. Is every member of that race, however many of tens or hundreds of millions people it may contain, responsible?

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 12:15:28

yep, in Chicago and other war torn lazy towns.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-04 11:13:47

This just in…..

BUSINESS
Illinois still losing residents to South, West: surveys

Kim Janssen
Two recent surveys — one published by the U.S. Census Bureau and another by movers United Van Lines — both put Illinois among the top three states losing residents to the rest of the U.S. in 2015.

Comment by DinOR
2016-01-04 12:17:00

For the life of me I can’t figure out why IL is still running a lottery? They haven’t paid out anything over $25k ( and I’ve heard of late down to $600 ) since last Summer.

Were it a privately owned casino, it would’ve been shut down by now.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 12:38:25

Listen to yourself:

“For the life of me I can’t figure out why IL is still running a lottery?”

No clue? Not one? Here, consider this next statement of yours as a rather hefty clue:

“They haven’t paid out anything over $25k ( and I’ve heard of late down to $600 ) since last Summer.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 12:42:58

What pisses me off about this situation is I’m not in on it.

The lottery players have obviously been severely dumbed down but the profit is going to others.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2016-01-04 14:42:56

DinOR

Dude, good to see you posting again

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-04 06:01:30

It looks like you guys will have another opportunity to BTFD today.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:21:23

My memory’s a little fuzzy on this, but I seem to recall that txchick commented on that bad market day during October that she didn’t think it was the big one, but the big one would probably be in January after the first of the year.

Hmm…

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 06:55:56

Seems a little early in the year for Mr Market to get Shanghai’d, but who knows?

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 07:09:17

txchick has corrected me below. Not go time yet. Oh, well.

OTOH, I’ve been reading some tasty stuff about the tech bubble 2.0. I’d like to think there’s going to be an implosion there, but I’m not holding my breath yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:10:35

The Chinese Ponzi market implosion will start the dominoes tumbling.

Got gold?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 07:25:46
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:52:50

BloombergBusiness
China Stock Selloff Tests New Market Circuit Breakers
New measures to curb volatility risk doing the opposite
Stock investors rushed to sell after first trading halt

The sell orders piled up fast on Monday at Shenwan Hongyuan Group, China’s fifth-biggest brokerage by market value.

China’s CSI 300 Index had just tumbled 5 percent, triggering a 15-minute trading halt, and investors were scrambling to exit before getting locked in by a full-day suspension set to take effect at 7 percent. When the first halt was lifted, the market reaction was swift: it took just seven minutes for losses to reach the threshold for a second suspension as volumes surged to their highs of the day.

“Investors rushed to the door during the level-one stage of the circuit breaker as they fretted the market would go down further,” said William Wong, the head of sales trading at Shenwan Hongyuan in Hong Kong.

Spiraling losses on the first day of China’s circuit breakers show how measures meant to help restore calm to one of the world’s most volatile equity markets risk doing just the opposite. The selloff could spur policy makers to “fine tune” the new rules, according to Andrew Sullivan, managing director for sales trading at Haitong International Securities Group Ltd. in Hong Kong. Unlike similar circuit breakers in markets including the U.S., the threshold for trading halts in China is low enough that they would have kicked in 20 times last summer alone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:27:19

-300 at the bell right now…

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 07:52:12

Well, I guess they’ll be playing pocket pool between 300 and 400 down for a while.

Yawn. Wake me up the TS really HTF.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:04:20

I was expecting an article on living within your means and not using your house as a free piggy bank ATM…

—————————–

6 Ways to Protect Your Home From the Coming Foreclosure Crisis
John Persinos - 01/03/16 - The Street

Think the mortgage foreclosure crisis is long over? Think again. A legacy of the Great Recession of 2008-2009, the problem of financially pressed Americans losing their homes wasn’t solved — only deferred.

Many public and private temporary relief measures will expire in 2016, likely triggering a new wave of home repossessions. This scenario is only one of many dangers lurking for investors in the new year. Below, we show you six ways to protect your home from foreclosure.

To be sure, eight years after the mortgage crisis initially emerged, foreclosures are down. At the peak in 2010, nearly 3 million homes experienced foreclosure filings in 2010; in 2013, the number was down to 1.1 million.

But that’s about to change. Notably, home equity lines of credit that homeowners took out during the prerecession “go-go” years (when homeowners routinely used their homes as ATM machines) will start to feature increased payments in 2016, as borrowers are forced to pay back principal instead of merely the interest.

1) Carefully Scrutinize All Information

2) See if a Payment Will Extricate You

3) Seek a Compromise

4) Borrow Money From a Family Member or Friend

5) Refinance the Loan

6) Sell the House

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-04 06:43:50

7) You should have refinanced by now, rolling the new car, vacations, box wine and stock purchases into a shiny new 30 year loan. Keep making payments as long as prices in your neighborhood keep going up.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 06:51:50

8) Sell your blood, sell your body parts, sell your teen aged daughter - sell whatever you need to sell in order to keep up with those house payments.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 06:58:29

“3) Seek a Compromise”

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:01:36

Here’s what seeking a compromise looks like …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XGAmPRxV48

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:18:38

Oh, I almost forgot …

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

 
 
 
 
Comment by bink
2016-01-04 07:31:29

4) Borrow Money From a Family Member or Friend

(and then immediately write them off as family members or friends)

Comment by rms
2016-01-05 19:03:47

Recall that 62% Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. :)

 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:32:36

Of all the words listed in the dictionary my favorite word by far is the word …

“ADJUSTABLE”.

If you have to wonder why that is then come in to my bank and I will be happy to explain it to you over a free cup of coffee.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:46:01

That “free” cup of coffee will cost bagholders almost as much as Susanne’s “research” on a new house.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:47:35

Suzanne researched this…the infamous Century 21 ad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20n-cD8ERgs

Comment by rms
2016-01-05 19:15:47

Gotta love her rattlesnake twitch that intimidates her eunuch husband to fold like a bed sheet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-04 08:20:53

The article implies that these are temporary tactics to stall the foreclosure for a few months so you have a chance to “clean up your finances.” Yeah, this works if you’re already rich and just need to free up some liquidity from somewhere else (and then sack your adviser for neglecting your loan). But if your income is $50K and you cashed-out into a $300K loan for a now-$150K house, ain’t no amount of “scrutinize” is going to save you.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 08:36:05

Sometimes it’s not about saving, sometimes it’s about bleeding.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-04 12:44:23

Yes, bloodletting is one strategy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:04:28

Looks like a bad day in store for Mr. Market.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:11:48

Will 2016 be the year our Fed-blown asset bubbles and Ponzi markets finally meet their financial reckoning day?

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 07:33:59

If things were to go to hell in a hand basket like in 08 would both Hillary and Trump be playing kissyface over a bailout like both sides did in 08? Any other R or D would. Least I’m not sure on Trump.

Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2016-01-04 14:48:04

Trump the RE media star? Of course he would.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 20:49:25

“Least I’m not sure on Trump.”

That’s because you don’t pay any attention to history.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 20:51:22

Donald Trump was one of the first to be ‘too big to fail’
Business Insider By Eames Yates
October 26, 2015 8:24 AM

Donald Trump has had many highs and lows when it comes to his finances. Author Michael D’Antonio reveals the reason why Trump was one of the first to be “too big to fail” in his book Never Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success.

 
 
 
Comment by rms
2016-01-05 19:22:00

“Will 2016 be the year our Fed-blown asset bubbles and Ponzi markets finally meet their financial reckoning day?”

They can still send everyone a $50k check to stimulate the economy.

 
 
Comment by Dudgeon Bludgeon
2016-01-04 07:15:07

YANG Leveraged ETF, baby. It’s going to be a good day.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-04 07:22:02

It’s interesting to keep an eye on the Chinese. Another month of contracting manufacturing reported. Looks like their echo stock bubble is rolling over. Markets closed on max down limit. This week their rule against big players selling times out.

Remember, China is the engine that pulls global growth!

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:35:47

“Remember, China is the engine that pulls global growth!”

Also remember, what fuels (fueled?) this “global growth” (chuckle) is (was?) lots and lots and lots of borrowed money.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:10:39

2banana’s Law:

Long term democrat rule + insane public unions + huge free sh*t army = misery, ruin and bankruptcy

FYI - for all those looking to retire or just starting out in life. From the chart in the article, I would choose a state in the bottom 15. And yes, they all do seem to have a few things in common.

———————-

Puerto Rico Is Greece, & These 5 States Are Next To Go
ZeroHedge - 01/03/2016

As Wilbur Ross so eloquently noted, for Puerto Rico “it’s the end of the beginning… and the beginning of the end,” as he explained “Puerto Rico is the US version of Greece.” However, as JPMorgan explains, for some states the pain is really just beginning as Municipal bond risk will only become more important over time, as assets of some severely underfunded plans are gradually depleted.

But, as JPMorgan details, Muni risk is on the rise for US states, but broad generalizations do not apply (in other words, these five states are ’screwed’)…

The direct indebtedness of US states (excluding revenue bonds) is $500 billion. However, bonds are just one part of the picture: states have another trillion in future obligations related to pension and retiree healthcare. In the summer of 2014, we conducted a deep-dive analysis of US states, incorporating bonds, pension obligations and retiree healthcare obligations. After reviewing over 300 Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports from different states, we pulled together an assessment of each state’s total debt service relative to its tax collections, incorporating the need to pay down underfunded pension and retiree healthcare obligations.

While there are five states with significant challenges (Illinois, Connecticut, Hawaii, New Jersey, and Kentucky) , the majority of states have debt service-to-revenue ratios that are more manageable.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:22:45

Yep, Malloy has done a bang-up job screwing Connecticut. Can’t wait to see how and when that pans out.

 
Comment by DinOR
2016-01-04 12:25:07

Sure he didn’t mean these are the 5 states that will be the most, pyrotechnic?

Probably why mutual fund companies began rolling out those “life cycle funds” the 2010, 2020, 2030 etc. That way they can spread the risk by palming them off on younger investors w/ no choice but to Hold.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:21:21

obama will ignore the US Constitution and the will of the Congress/Senate and impose gun control through EOs.

His first step, as always, is to go after his political enemies using the vast resources of federal agencies (such as the IRS).

Democrats always believe that the tactics they use against others will never be used against them.

And they will burn in the camps…

—————–

Years of NRA tax filings are loaded with apparent falsehoods
New York Post | January 3, 2016 | Isabel Vincent and Melissa Klein

The National Rifle Association doesn’t shoot straight when it comes to documenting its lobbying and political activities, filing tax forms for years that were littered with information gaps and apparent falsehoods, a Post review of the filings found.

And for six years on tax filings, the NRA failed to list the Political Victory Fund, its PAC, as one of its associated organizations. These tax documents are signed under “penalties of perjury.”

CREW also asked the Federal Elections Commission to audit the NRA. The FEC wouldn’t comment, but a recent filing on its Web site shows the NRA paid the agency $2,750 as part of a settlement agreement.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office, which regulates nonprofits and collects both the federal tax return and audited financial statements from the NRA, refused to comment on whether it was investigating the organization.

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 07:56:49

Those EOs - obammy can shove them up where the sun don’t shine. No patriotic gun owner will follow them.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 09:00:19

Will be exactly as effective as the war on drugs.

 
 
 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 06:23:42

Another year of fake HGTV shows selling lies about how cheap it is to remodel and flip or cupcake shows lying about how making a cupcake is somehow hard.

Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-04 06:29:59

The molding of fondant is both an art and a science.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 07:34:58

Fondant makes cupcakes taste awful.

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 11:10:25

Throwing more good money after bad on a depreciating asset at a grossly inflated price results in Empty Pockets.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:25:56

I ask my liberals friends - name ONE thing obama has done to increase the size of the middle class or to create jobs.

There is no answer.

So who is going to buy all these $500,000 crack shacks?

———————

Obamacare Tightens Yoke on Small Business
American Spectator | 1/4/2016 | David Catron

One of the worst of Obamacares ill-conceived provisions went quietly into effect on January 1. The employer mandate, previously inflicted only on businesses with 100 or more employees, will now be imposed on those with as few as 50. This mandate will prevent countless small employers from hiring workers they would otherwise have hired and incentivize many others to replace full-time employees with part-timers. It is such an obvious job killer that the Obama administration delayed enforcement until after the 2014 midterms, the liberal Urban Institute has called for its repeal, and it has even been obliquely criticized by Hillary Clinton.

The employer mandate requires all businesses with 50 or more full-time employees to provide health coverage to at least 95 percent of these employees as well as any dependents they may have under age 26, or pay crippling fines. But not all small employers can afford to offer insurance. Those which lack the resources to do so will avoid the mandate by assuring that the number of full-time workers they employ remains below 50. And, because Obamacare has arbitrarily redefined full-time to mean 30 or more hours per week, the employer mandate effectively caps both the number of workers many businesses can hire and how many hours they will work.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:14:16

The middle class hope ‘n change veggies lack the intelligence to connect the rectal bleeding they are experiencing with their votes for Obama and the status quo.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 08:11:24

Your conversations with your imaginary friends form no basis for rational thought.

 
 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-04 06:28:38

The nation survived Jimmy Carter so the nation will survive Donald Trump.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:34:11

The nation has not survived. ’tis but a toe tag on a corpse.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2016-01-04 06:36:22

Looking like 2000 at the start. That year, the market puked into February and then made the big drive to the top in March. Personally I wouldn’t chase this move on the downside. Second mouse gets the cheese. A nice preview of what’s to come though.

I like natgas if you must be long something.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 06:48:57

Not go time yet? Sigh.

Comment by txchick57
2016-01-04 07:03:37

Don’t forget all the new money that comes in at the beginning of the year. I suspect this dip will be bought. I’m not interested in being jerked around. If I’m wrong, there’s plenty of room on the downside.

 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-04 06:53:05

pg&e is raising rates and charging 1.15 / therm this as nat gas has cratered. They are trying to pay for their lawsuits.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:15:19

Seems like the good ole days have returned, with txchick advising again on short timing…

Comment by bink
2016-01-04 07:33:17

It brings a tear to my eye. *sniff*

Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2016-01-04 20:31:48

A tear to the eye and hope to the heart. :D

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:16:15

Yellen the Felon is itching for an excuse to announce QE4 and NIRP. A near-term dump could give her just the pretext she needs to tell her insider cronies to BTFD, then dump more financial crack on the markets.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 07:54:10

Lotsa Lolas long on gas already

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 06:44:34

Looks like the Flight to Safety (and Dash From Trash) has begun in earnest.

http://www.kitco.com/market/

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 06:47:42

Palladium gets no respect…

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:00:10

Commodities got no respect for five years running already.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-04 07:16:41

Yes, I read this little gem yesterday.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-03/why-silicon-valley-may-be-defcon-1-status

Of course, the market is grossly manipulated, so it remains in unicorn territory.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:03:15

Has one round too many round of quantitative easing left the global central banking cartel trying to steer a rudderless ship adrift in a sea of volatility?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:17:43

It’s more like the Oligopoly-looted 99% have lost so much in purchasing power and net worth (in real terms) that there is no demand to prop up the ficticious market valuations anymore.

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-01-04 07:21:48

Comment by Patrick
2016-01-03 19:22:19

Fake capital purchased shares and created untrustworthy market prices supported by free money to a select handful of insiders.

What happens when this small handful panic ?

They appear to be gambling that they will be able to spot when interest rates start to hurt well in advance of the general market. Really !

Remember, one world event overnight could trigger a pin to break these bubbles.

We have more well educated people in business than ever before - MBAs by the truckload.

Why do they seem to think that the financial markets are more important than the shop floor ?

We all know that this bubble will break with higher interest rates. But when ?
Reply to this comment
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-01-03 19:31:16

Oh dear…

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/shcomp?countrycode=cn&mod=MW_story_quote

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-03 20:48:15

Let’s put that right out in the open so AlbqDan can clearly see it (assuming he still lurks here):

Shanghai Composite Index 3,399.91
Change -139.27 -3.94%
Volume 145.84m
Jan 4, 2016, 11:30 a.m.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-03 20:52:32

It’s still turtles all the way down in China.

Asian markets slide on fears of stalling Chinese economy
Published: Jan 3, 2016 10:32 p.m. ET
Shares tumble across region; oil futures rise on Saudi-Iran rift
Women wearing traditional kimono dresses ring in the new year at the Tokyo Stock Exchange on January 4, 2016.
By Chao Deng

Shares across Asia tumbled Monday, the first trading day of the year, after the latest signal that China’s economy is stalling.

The Shanghai Composite Index (SHCOMP, -3.94%) fell 3.4%, the smaller Shenzhen Composite (399106, -5.34%) is down 4.5% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index (HSI, -2.33%) fell 2.1%.

Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average (NIK, -2.59%) was down 2.6% while South Korea’s Kospi (SEU, -1.46%) was down 1.6%.

Markets around the world were closed Friday for the New Year’s holiday.

The losses in the region deepened after a private gauge of Chinese manufacturing activity continued to weaken. The Caixin China manufacturing purchasing managers index fell to 48.2 in December from 48.6 the previous month. A figure under 50 indicates contraction.

“I think this will raise expectations of more government action to support the economy,” wrote Andrew Sullivan, managing director at Haitong International Securities, in a note, adding that manufacturers continued to trim their staff numbers.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 00:46:51

It’s broken, but not everyone knows it yet.

ft dot com > Companies > Transport >
Shipping
January 3, 2016 4:17 pm
Shipowners rocked by sinking charter rate
Robert Wright in New York

China’s slowing growth and a glut of ships have hit earnings for vessels carrying coal and other dry bulk commodities so hard that owners face forced sales, emergency capital raisings and possible bankruptcy.

Charter fees are not covering vessels’ operating costs, let alone their financing, in the latest bad news for the many private equity firms that have invested in the sector.

Short-term charter rates for Capesize ships — the largest kind — were as low as $4,897 a day on December 23, down from more than $20,000 a day in August. Vessels typically cost around $13,000 a day to operate and finance.

The Baltic Dry index, which measures overall average charter rates, has been at its lowest levels since it started in 1985.”

And this was on a post about global recession.

The bits bucket = azdude at the roulette table,”red or black, RED OR BLACK?!”

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:26:44

“We have more well educated people in business than ever before - MBAs by the truckload.”

Bahahahaha …hence we are saved!

Bahahahahahahaha …I love this blog

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:32:54

Trying to rescue the global economy by artificially jacking up asset prices to financially engineer artificial wealth effects was a dumb idea, and the bad results are just beginning to bite.

The worst part is that the wizards who run the global central banking cartel have yet to admit that this approach is guaranteed to fail.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 07:39:17

“The worst part is that the wizards who run the global central banking cartel have yet to admit that this approach is guaranteed to fail.”

Fail? You think it has failed? It’s working just as I hoped it would work.

Pukes work, bankers reap. God’s plan.

 
Comment by Neuromance
2016-01-04 09:33:47

Professor Bear: The worst part is that the wizards who run the global central banking cartel have yet to admit that this approach is guaranteed to fail.

In one way it succeeds. It preserves privilege, which the fortunate in societies have been trying to do for millennia.

Yes, Japan is the model. I remember Japan being pilloried in the 90s in the popular press for its zombie companies, but it panicked and did what it needed to preserve the status quo for the privileged. When push came to shove, the rest of the world did the same sorts of things.

It’s not just financial machinations, it’s government - politicians - refusing to contemplate sane industrial policies. Politicians nowadays are first and foremost skilled development officers, not legislators.

So, stagnation it is. Had creative destruction been allowed, had there been an attempt to hold malefactors responsible, the US would have done what many had assumed it would do, based on the propaganda fed to the public. However, when push comes to shove - when the tide goes out - the average citizen finds out how the system really works. It had been rotting for a while, but it was well hidden.

Comment by Neuromance
2016-01-04 09:39:58

Neuromance: Had creative destruction been allowed, had there been an attempt to hold malefactors responsible, the US would have done what many had assumed it would do, based on the propaganda fed to the public.

“Socialism for the elites, rugged individualism for everyone else.”

We thought it would be rugged individualism for everyone, based on the national meme. Now we know better :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 09:51:14

Bottom line: Dumb ‘em down, and profit.

Forever! Dumb ‘em down and keep them dumbed down forever and you will profit forever.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2016-01-04 09:43:33

Trying to rescue the global economy by artificially jacking up asset prices to financially engineer artificial wealth effects was a dumb idea, and the bad results are just beginning to bite.”

with no inflation how will they pay back all the debt plus entitlements ? This is the real doomsday scenario.

 
Comment by redmondjp
2016-01-04 14:18:49

No, the truth is (tinfoil hat now on), they KNOW that this behavior will cause the existing financial system to fail. It’s by design.

Then, they can trot out the new, global UN-based financial system which will make all of our regional central banks obsolete and unnecessary overnight. Along with a new global currency, of course.

What choice will we have but to accept it? It will be proposed as an improvement, the solution to our global economic woes. Just like we bailed out the “too big to fail” banks and other institutions, the new global system will do the same with “too big to fail” regional economies (China, US, Europe, etc).

This has been the plan all along, and it’s all going according to the plan.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 15:51:28

A little dramatic are we?

Remember…… Nothing accelerates the economy and lifts the standard of living like falling prices to dramatically lower and more affordable levels. Nothing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 17:07:50

ft dot com
January 4, 2016 6:03 pm
Deflate stock market and allow China’s fortunes to swell
Joe Zhang
An investor sits in front of a screen showing stock market movements in a stock firm in Fuyang, east China’s Anhui province on January 4, 2016. Trading on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges was ended early on January 4 after shares fell seven percent, the first time China’s new “circuit breaker” intervened to curb market volatility.
AFP PHOTO CHINA OUT / AFP / STR

China should celebrate the collapse of its stock market. That was not the instinct of officials last summer when the Shanghai Composite index lost close to one-third of its value in four short weeks.

Back then, Beijing launched investigations into what it called “malicious short selling” and spent $200bn to prop up falling equity prices. But give the Communist party its due. When one trick stops working, officials are not shy to admit it.

The Shanghai Composite fell 7 per cent on Monday; further falls are likely. Yet we are unlikely to see more of the heavy handed intervention to which officials resorted in 2015. This is not because Beijing does not have the means to prop up the index, but rather because officials have come to believe it desirable for high stock market valuations to be unwound. Large sections of the public are beginning to agree with them.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:36:14

So if I am a wealthy Chinese guy, I want to get my wealth out of the country while currency devaluation is underway, then to repatriate it when the fire sale begins, right?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 07:38:20

The Sydney Morning Herald
China cracks down on foreign banks to stem cash flowing out of country
China’s central bank had suspended at least three foreign banks from conducting some of their foreign exchange business until the end of March
Photo: Remi Bianchi
By Engen Tham and Denny Thomas

Chinese authorities are starting to police the nation’s foreign exchange market in a way currency traders have rarely seen before, levying penalty payments for aggressive trading and prompting some banks to turn down business.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that China’s central bank had suspended at least three foreign banks from conducting some of their foreign exchange business until the end of March.

China’s past willingness to tolerate some capital flight has paved the way for locals to take billions from the country for funnelling into assets such as French vineyards and luxury properties in the world’s leading cities.

But with the country’s growth at its weakest in 25 years and the currency heading for a record fall this year, China is aiming to stem the capital outflows, which can be exacerbated by the widening gap between onshore and offshore exchange rates for the yuan, or renminbi.

“China is essentially trying to close that gap and it’s much more difficult to do that if you have these outsiders coming in and taking advantage of the arbitrage,” said Jimmy Weng, Hong Kong-based fund manager at Genesis Capital Investment.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-04 07:47:11

Repatriating money might not be a safe thing to do for quite a while, unless you are encouraged to give it back by the authorities.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 07:41:50

Hope and change for the native born youngins….

They still can’t seem to see the linkage of their vote for obama and having no jobs and no future.

———————-

Yellen’s Job Puzzle: Why Are 20-Somethings Retiring?
Americans are increasingly foregoing paychecks due to disability, school
Bloomberg - January 4, 2016

How come more people are retiring in their early 20s? Why are middle-age men becoming stay-at-home dads? What’s keeping women out of the workforce other than illness, kids or school?

Those are some of the questions raised in a new Bureau of Labor Statistics report that shows changes over the past decade in why people stay out of the labor force. Finding answers is key for the Federal Reserve as it maps the contours of a job market that’s becoming harder to predict with the aging of the baby boomers and shifting household priorities.

Here’s what the bureau found, broadly: Thirty-five percent of the U.S. population wasn’t in the labor force in 2014, up from 31.3 percent a decade earlier. (You’re considered out of the workforce if you don’t have a job and aren’t looking for one. That’s distinct from the official unemployment rate, which tracks those out of work who are actively job hunting.)

Other reasons for not working are also on the rise. More men between 25 and 54 cited home responsibilities, while women of the same age range increasingly point to illness or school as the leading cause. The data also show, perhaps not surprisingly, that men and women without a high-school diploma are more than three times as likely to be out of the workforce than their peers with a college degree.

Understanding why people aren’t in the workforce — and whether it’s permanent or temporary — is important for the Fed. Policy makers are trying to estimate remaining slack in the labor market and the outlook for inflation as they weigh the timing of the next interest-rate increase.

Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2016-01-04 16:03:24

Unemployment has halved since Obama took office, genius.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-04 07:50:25

The best contrarian indicator ever. There are no more inept prognosticators on the planet than the clueless/co-opted Fed hacks.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/feds-mester-sees-slight-pickup-in-growth-in-2016-and-is-not-worried-about-risks-2016-01-03

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 07:53:09

Teaching your kids the value of financial responsibility through Bitcoin

https://news.bitcoin.com/value-of-a-bitcoin-teaching-kids-financial-responsibility/

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 08:02:22

Oh Mr. Banker…

Bitcoin Encourages Kids to Save and Avoid Debt

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 08:08:37

Bahahaha … I’ll wait until these kids have accumulated some big bucks then, when they are of age, I’ll shove a sheet of paper in front of them and have them sign a dotted line or two and - presto! - their hard-earned savings will be on its way to belonging to me.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 09:55:53

Thank you God for the Dream Merchants, the Amys of the world who bring to me an endless supply of throughly prepped starry-eyed dotted-line signers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 08:07:45

Yellen’s Job Puzzle: Why Are 20-Somethings Retiring?

Americans are increasingly foregoing paychecks due to disability, school or retirement

Kasia Klimasinska
Benchmark
January 4, 2016 — 8:00 AM EST

Here’s what the bureau found, broadly: Thirty-five percent of the U.S. population wasn’t in the labor force in 2014, up from 31.3 percent a decade earlier. (You’re considered out of the workforce if you don’t have a job and aren’t looking for one. That’s distinct from the official unemployment rate, which tracks those out of work who are actively job hunting.)

Drilling down into the numbers reveals more about the shifts in the reasons some people forego a paycheck. In all age groups, for instance, more people cited retirement as the reason for being out of the labor force, and it wasn’t just older people.

For Americans between the ages of 20 and 24, the share of those sidelined over the past decade because they were in school increased, unsurprisingly, during the decade that included the Great Recession. What’s more unusual is that the share of 20- to 24-year-olds who say they’re retired doubled from 2004 to 2014.

Comment by "Auntie Fed, why won't you love ME?"
2016-01-04 16:04:42

So the number of retired 20-year-olds doubled from two to four? And this is based on their own word, correct?

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 08:24:55

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton LASHES OUT at Rape Survivor at NH Town Hall – After Questions About Husband Bill

Hillary LASHED OUT at the questioner

Gateway Pundit | Jim Hoft - January 4, 2016

Hillary Clinton held a small town hall event at Derry, New Hampshire on Sunday.

During the event State Rep. Katherine Prudhomme-O’Brien (R) repeatedly asked three times about her husband’s past sexual misconduct.

After the third attempt Hillary LASHED OUT at the questioner.

Rep. Katherine Prudhomme-O’Brien (R) told reporters she is concerned about the issue because she is a rape survivor.
CNN reporter: Why does this matter to you?

Prudhomme-O’Brien: Because I’m a rape survivor myself.

Lawmaker heckles Clinton over sex scandals - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7cEnRkOaXE - 188k -

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 08:46:38

“Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault. Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed and we’re with you.”
– Hillary Clinton, 14 SEP 2015

Video here:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/09/14/hillary_clinton_women_should_be_believed_when_they_claim_rape_have_to_increase_prevention.html#!

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 09:25:31

Hillary to rape survivor…

“You are very rude and I’m not going to ever call on you.”

Cheers from Hillary supporters.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 11:10:00

Hilary can be tough. Did she tweet the girl was ugly later, Trump-style?

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 13:53:14

“Hilary can be tough. Did she tweet the girl was ugly later, Trump-style?”

Well that would be the pot saying the kettle has cankles and wears adult diapers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 08:32:43

“Obama will also take questions from the audience.”

I’m sure the Kokos in the audience will do a fine job reading their questions.

Obama To Lead Town Hall On ‘Guns In America’ Thursday On CNN
Will take questions from the audience…

Kinsey Lowe | Deadline.com - January 3, 2016 101 Comments

In a move that is certain to stir things up as the political new year unfolds, President Obama will lead a televised town hall Thursday to address tightening restrictions on access to guns. Obama will sit down with Anderson Cooper on CNN at 8 p.m. ET for the one-hour event titled “Guns in America,” which coincides with the fifth anniversary, next Friday, of the shooting of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, in a mass shooting that left six dead and 13 others wounded.

Obama will also take questions from the audience. The President has repeatedly expressed his frustration with Congress’ unwillingness to pass new gun laws and has frequently spoken out about increased gun control in the wake of mass shootings.

Obama also plans to meet Monday with Attorney General Loretta Lynch to discuss options for tougher gun restrictions and is expected to announce soon an executive action with the goal of expanding background checks on gun sales.

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 08:42:25

Q: “Should not politicians that vote to disarm American citizens have their own armed body guards taken from them so that they can lead by example?

Q: “What is the difference between instituting gun control by EOs and a dictator?”

Q: “Will people go to jail or be fined by violating your EOs? On what basis?”

Q: “When republicans, in the future, use these same tactics against democrats (ie. ignoring the constitution and the congress/senate) - will you support that republican?”

Q: “Do you think ANY of your EOs will make even the smallest dent in gun violence? Especially black on black gun violence. If yes - How?

Q: “Why do you hate freedom and the US Constitution so much? Especially when you took an oath to uphold and defend it?”

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 08:51:57

Scare tactics, dividing people along class and racial lines, fear mongering, promising more free sh*t and never let a crisis go to waste.

Standard democrat playbook. Democrats could never be elected otherwise…

——————–

Al Gore Armageddon Clock About To Hit Zero After Ten Years
Dailycaller.com ^ | 1-2-2015 | KERRY PICKET

Gore predicted, when his film “An Inconvenient Truth” was first released at the Sundance Film Festival, that the earth would be in “a true planetary emergency” within the next ten years unless drastic action was taken to reduce greenhouse gases.

CBS News reported at the time that Gore’s film predicted the worst-case scenarios would be a new ice age in Europe, massive floods in China, India, and other areas. Gore described himself as a “recovering politician” to the Sundance audience at the time and that he “benefits from low expectations.”

“What really attracted us to this presentation is the tone Al strikes,” said “An Inconvenient Truth” director Davis Guggenheim to CBS. “It’s not righteous. It doesn’t have a political agenda. It lands right in the middle, and Al just lays out what is this inconvenient truth. And I think that’s why the audience is willing to receive it.”

Climate models scientists referred to for the past six decades were incorrect, a working paper released in December by CATO scientists Patrick Michaels and Chip Knappenberger said. Both Michaels and Knappenberger discovered the models over-projected the warming rates than what actually happened.

“During all periods from 10 years (2006-2015) to 65 (1951-2015) years in length, the observed temperature trend lies in the lower half of the collection of climate model simulations,” Michaels and Knappenberger said, “and for several periods it lies very close (or even below) the 2.5th percentile of all the model runs.”

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-04 09:05:44

Scare tactics, dividing people along class and racial lines, fear mongering, promising more free sh*t and never let a crisis go to waste.

(Psst, banana! You’re accidentally including your supervisor’s instructions in your posts.)

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 09:11:33

Terrorist flatulence is the REAL cause of global warming.

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 09:53:57

“Terrorist flatulence is the REAL cause of global warming.”

Don’t be silly.

Everyone knows that the settled science which had global warming playing hide and seek under the Atlantic Ocean discredited the deniers Terrorist flatulence theory before the NOAA scientists had “adjusted” the temperature models to show that there had been no hiatus at all even though the federal government’s chief climate research agency is refusing to give House Republicans the detailed information they want on a controversial study on climate change.

Citing confidentiality concerns and the integrity of the scientific process, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said it won’t give Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) the research documents he subpoenaed.

“We stand behind our scientists who conduct their work in an objective manner. It is the end product of exchanges between scientists — the detailed publication of scientific work and the data that underpins the authors’ findings — that are key to understanding the conclusions reached.

Clayton also refuted Smith’s implication that the study was political.

“There is no truth to the claim that the study was politically motivated or conducted to advance an agenda,” she said. “The published findings are the result of scientists simply doing their job, ensuring the best possible representation of historical global temperature trends is available to inform decisionmakers, including the U.S. Congress.”
Smith defended his investigation, saying NOAA’s work is clearly political.

“It was inconvenient for this administration that climate data has clearly showed no warming for the past two decades,” he said in a statement. “The American people have every right to be suspicious when NOAA alters data to get the politically correct results they want and then refuses to reveal how those decisions were made.”

Cause of hiatus found deep in the Atlantic Ocean
Posted on August 21, 2014 | 421 Comments

by Judith Curry

Rapid warming in the last three decades of the 20th century, they found, was roughly half due to global warming and half to the natural Atlantic Ocean cycle that kept more heat near the surface. When observations show the ocean cycle flipped, the current began to draw heat deeper into the ocean, working to counteract human-driven warming. – Chen and Tung

An important new paper has been published in Science, by Chen and Tung.

Excerpts from the press release (which was emailed to me by KK Tung):

Following rapid warming in the late 20th century, this century has so far seen surprisingly little increase in the average temperature at the Earth’s surface. At first this was a blip, then a trend, then a puzzle for the climate science community.

New research from the University of Washington shows that the heat absent from the surface is plunging deep in the north and south Atlantic Ocean, and is part of a naturally occurring cycle.

Subsurface ocean warming explains why global average air temperatures have flatlined since 1999, despite greenhouse gases trapping more solar heat at the Earth’s surface.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 10:12:12

The only ‘detailed information’ house republicans want is the arrival date for Rapture Jesus, and Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi!

 
Comment by Diane Reynolds
2016-01-04 11:30:56

“Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi!”

 
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 11:25:33

The GOP is also pretty good at scare tactics and catering to certain racial demographics. They also give away “free sh!t”, they just give it to different people.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 09:16:43

Immigration raids targeting Central Americans with removal orders have begun across the U.S.

By Chris Quinn Updated 5:39 pm, Sunday, January 3, 2016

Various news reports and social media posts from immigrant advocacy groups indicate that raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials targeting Central Americans have begun across the country.

In a tweet posted on Sunday by the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, the group said that raids had begun just before dawn.

The group #Not1More posted on their website that children as young as 4 years old were among those swept up by the raids.

The Dallas Morning News and Los Angeles Times also report that raids have begun.

In a blog post the Morning News said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a statement Sunday morning that referenced and reaffirmed “policy priorities” in a memo from November 2014, which stated the intent to detain and deport “aliens” who have been ordered by a federal judge to be removed.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/…/Immigration-raids-targeting-Central-Americans-6734063.php - 798k -

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 10:13:47

Here is a dirty little secret: Mexicans and “Central Americans” don’t like each other. I’m sure Mexicans in the USA are just fine with Guatemalans, Salvadorans, Hondurans, etc. being deported. No tears will be shed in the offices of MEChA or La Raza.

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 11:00:57

“I’m sure Mexicans in the USA are just fine with Guatemalans, Salvadorans, Hondurans, etc. being deported.”

Through the years I have known and become friends with quite a few Mexicans, Salvadorans, Hondurans and a couple of Guatemalans.

I couldn’t detect any animosity among them or between them and a French Canadian for that matter. Of course we all work, we all work doing the same thing and for the most part we all have families.

Maybe that makes a difference.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 12:51:09

Well, yeah, if you work together you’re going to be civil.

A common complaint that Central Americans have with Univision is that it caters to Mexicans first, Cubans second, and all other Latinos are pretty much ignored.

For example: Univision shows Mexican League Soccer, but rarely shows games from Central American countries.

Another factor is how Mexico treats Central American illegals, especially those crossing Mexico to get to the US . Let’s just say that they are little harsher with them than we are.

To get a better idea of the animosity, when Team Mexico has to play in a world cup qualifier in Central America, they have to keep the team’shotel location a secret. Team USA has to resort to that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 18:03:57

“Let’s just say that they are little harsher with them than we are.”

A little harsher?

Police state: How Mexico treats illegal aliens
Share
By Michelle Malkin • April 28, 2010 12:36 AM

Mexican President Felipe Calderon has accused Arizona of opening the door “to intolerance, hate, discrimination and abuse in law enforcement.” But Arizona has nothing on Mexico when it comes to cracking down on illegal aliens. While open-borders activists decry new enforcement measures signed into law in “Nazi-zona” last week, they remain deaf, dumb or willfully blind to the unapologetically restrictionist policies of our neighbors to the south.

— The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” How’s that for racial and ethnic profiling?

— If outsiders do not enhance the country’s “economic or national interests” or are “not found to be physically or mentally healthy,” they are not welcome. Neither are those who show “contempt against national sovereignty or security.” They must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam and prove they can provide their own health care.

— Illegal entry into the country is equivalent to a felony punishable by two years’ imprisonment. Document fraud is subject to fine and imprisonment; so is alien marriage fraud. Evading deportation is a serious crime; illegal re-entry after deportation is punishable by ten years’ imprisonment. Foreigners may be kicked out of the country without due process and the endless bites at the litigation apple that illegal aliens are afforded in our country (see, for example, President Obama’s illegal alien aunt — a fugitive from deportation for eight years who is awaiting a second decision on her previously rejected asylum claim).

— Law enforcement officials at all levels — by national mandate — must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The Mexican military is also required to assist in immigration enforcement operations. Native-born Mexicans are empowered to make citizens’ arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.

— Ready to show your papers? Mexico’s National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens’ identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.

 
 
 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 10:14:10

Buh but OBAMA! Permanent Democrat Supermajority! Open Borders! Gun Grabbers! BENGAAAAAAAAZI!

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:27:40

So they deport a couple a hundred, and legalize MILLIONs

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 18:00:31

Reagan gave amnesty to 3 mill illegals, can O top that? He better hurry up!! Then blame congress for being tricked in his memoirs.

history.//

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:35:30

We are talking 20-30 plus another 40 to 60 million from chain migration, so he certainly can top that. He’s already doubled Reagan’s with the stroke of a pen, DACA and DAPA > 6 million.

Checkmate.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 18:54:26

Thus ends this round of chess with pigeons. Now crap all over the board and fly away.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 19:17:54

You can keep your hotel maids, dishwasher and cooks…
D Trump

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 19:20:10

only people who fear Mexicans taking their jobs are the unskilled who cant compete. I have never hired anyone but Mexicans as my gardeners. All the cooks here are Mexicans.

Viva la fiesta!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 09:22:45

Where is the PPT?

The S&P 500 just breached 2000…

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 12:17:37

S&P 1700 in 2016.
Iran flood market with oil.
Hillary wins, everyone yawns.
CA has nasty mudslides and damage from el Nino.
RE starts to crash…..again

 
Comment by Mr Grinch
2016-01-04 12:46:47

Oh the humanity!

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 09:29:32

Thought for the day….

obama, his cronies at the Fed and democrats in general are trying desperately to hold off the inevitable bursting of the dam.

Big stock market and housing bubbles need to be timed to burst upon the first day of the Donald Trump presidency.

Things are happening ahead of the time line…

 
Comment by Neuromance
2016-01-04 09:35:24

I saw The Big Short the other day. I highly recommend it. It’s funny, dramatic and informative. The book may be different (haven’t read it), but the movie doesn’t absolve the big players of control fraud. It doesn’t focus on control fraud, but it definitely allows for the possibility. It’s a well done film, balancing entertainment and chronicling the run up to the Financial Crisis.

In an environment where 70 percent of Americans don’t know who Janet Yellen is, this will give people a neatly packaged and entertaining look at some of the issues that brought on the crisis.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 09:59:24

“70 percent of Americans don’t know who Janet Yellen is.”

Bahahahahahahaha … truly, a nation of dummy’s.

Comment by DaveBro in SonomaCo
2016-01-04 10:59:26

>Bahahahahahahaha … truly, a nation of dummy’s.
Oh, the irony.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2016-01-04 10:00:21

http://www.propublica.org/article/all-the-magnetar-trade-how-one-hedge-fund-helped-keep-the-housing-bubble

According to bankers and others involved, the Magnetar Trade worked this way: The hedge fund bought the riskiest portion of a kind of securities known as collateralized debt obligations — CDOs. If housing prices kept rising, this would provide a solid return for many years. But that’s not what hedge funds are after. They want outsized gains, the sooner the better, and Magnetar set itself up for a huge win: It placed bets that portions of its own deals would fail.

Along the way, it did something to enhance the chances of that happening, according to several people with direct knowledge of the deals. They say Magnetar pressed to include riskier assets in their CDOs that would make the investments more vulnerable to failure. The hedge fund acknowledges it bet against its own deals but says the majority of its short positions, as they are known on Wall Street, involved similar CDOs that it did not own. Magnetar says it never selected the assets that went into its CDOs.

Magnetar says it was “market neutral,” meaning it would make money whether housing rose or fell. (Read their full statement.) Dozens of Wall Street professionals, including many who had direct dealings with Magnetar, are skeptical of that assertion. They understood the Magnetar Trade as a bet against the subprime mortgage securities market. Why else, they ask, would a hedge fund sponsor tens of billions of dollars of new CDOs at a time of rising uncertainty about housing?

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-04 14:20:04

“70 percent of Americans don’t know who Janet Yellen is.”

I’d be willing to bet over 70% of Portlanders don’t know whose blood money currently owns the Timbers…then again, championships have a Jedi mind trick effect over such matters especially over impressionable hipsters.

 
 
Comment by clark
2016-01-04 09:36:23

More joys for Mr. Banker:

“Why Not Sell a Portion of Your Home?”

“… a fund that would invest to co-own houses. “They could own 10 percent or 15 percent of your house, so you don’t have to borrow as much,” Rampell told NYT. “I think there’s a lot of room for more of those kind of new asset classes.”

The originality of the idea seems to make is appear somewhat insane, but I think it could have some sound uses.

Rampell is apparently thinking about such financing in terms of aiding in buying a house:

Mr. Rampell said, such a fund could invest to co-own houses in, say, pricey Palo Alto, Calif., making it easier for prospective home buyers to make down payments and reduce their mortgage burden.

That’s one possibility, but I think where it could have even a better possibility is after there has been an extensive boom in prices of real estate. If a homeowner doesn’t want to move, but would like to cash out some of the equity in his house, the only way to do that now is with a second mortgage, which, of course, leaves the owner extremely vulnerable during a downturn, But if instead of taking out a second mortgage a 10% to 15% stake in the house is sold, the downturn wouldn’t be so financially devastating if the first mortgage isn’t that large in the first place.” …

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/why-not-sell-portion-of-your-home.html

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 09:46:31

Hell yeah… sell 100% stake, stop making payments, sell the appliances and copper, then have a massive blowout party that leaves nothing but a smoking ruin.

What the hell are these people thinking?

 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 10:33:41

Or just do AirBnB 365 days a year…

And live in the closet.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:28:48

Lola?

 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 12:17:40

“More joys for Mr. Banker.”

Very possible. Let us take a peek at some of the possibilities:

First, there’s the upkeep; if the partial owner can get the majority owner to agree to pay for all the upkeep then the partial owner will get to enjoy a free ride.

Next comes taxes; if the partial owner can convince the majority owner to pay all the taxes then the free ride is extended to the partial owner accordingly.

If/when it comes time to sell the house then … what? Does the partial owner get to have his say in the deal? If the answer is “yes” then the partial owner gets to enjoy some leverage over the majority owner.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 10:26:04

What ever happened in Dumbo where the limousine liberals didn’t want their kids going to school with those poor black and brown students from the housing project?

I can’t find a follow up.

Brooklyn school battle not so ‘black and white’

By Andrea Peyser
October 2, 2015 | 2:53am

The story played out in much of the media as A Tale of Two Cities — on methamphetamines.

Wealthy, white Brooklyn parents were said to be lunging for the Xanax en masse. Under a plan put forward by the New York City Department of Education, little Matilda or Asher could be booted from their precious, racially segregated and woefully overcrowded (read: majority-white) public elementary school. And some kids who live in million-dollar-plus condos in the gentrified Dumbo neighborhood would be sent to an underperforming and under-enrolled school that draws many of its overwhelmingly poor black and brown students from a housing project.

Are racists hiding out among progressive New Yorkers?

“Brooklyn — The Capital of Liberal Hypocrisy,’’ declared the National Review.

Then, on Sept. 21, another town hall was held at mostly white PS 8. And this time, reporters leapt at the chance to cast bourgeois parents as opposed to racial diversity.

One white dad complained that he didn’t “want to be the bad guy’’ by pointing out that PS 307 was “severely underperforming.’’

“How does sending Dumbo and Vinegar Hill children to the school solve PS 307’s problems?’’ he asked.

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 10:41:47

2banana’s Rule:

Conservatives are more than happy to live under the same laws and taxes they want for everyone else.

Liberals/Progressives/Democrats expect to be exempted from the same laws and taxes they want for everyone else.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 11:11:56

Angry old men aren’t happy unless they can complain about how the world is going to hell in a handbasket. Give you guys a tax free libertarian paradise and you’ll be forced to bitch about the gays and the trannies and the pot smokers all day.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 12:54:03

Plus they’ll be screaming for those lost SS checks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 17:49:54

“Plus they’ll be screaming for those lost SS checks.”

The money they paid in?

Shouldn’t they at least get that back?

Hell, give me what I paid in to SS and half the money I paid in as a match for others and I would be rich beyond my wildest dreams.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 13:13:45

+1
old people with nothing better to do but complain. Ever go to an HOA meeting?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:30:00

Angry old men? You seem to have left out your usual “white”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 18:20:16

Old men bitching is a quality that transcends race. Bitching about black people getting stuff is the province of angry old white men.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:38:54

I think you’re just getting old in your alzheimers and forgot to throw it in like you normally do. Daddy Soros won’t cut you a bonus check if you keep slipping like that.

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 11:29:53

“Conservatives are more than happy to live under the same laws and taxes they want for everyone else.”

As long as those laws and tax loopholes are favorable to them.

Wake up, Banana, both parties are corrupt.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 11:39:22

But there are no fiscal conservatives in the GOP. none. nada. zip.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:31:06

Open borders isn’t fiscally conservative Lola.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 11:36:28

I wonder if Jeb is on the phone with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to see how he can help? Maybe they will sell Fox News and all their Houston properties now before Iran kicks their arsse.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 12:52:33

I’m sure the USA would run to defend SA in a war with Iran.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 13:13:45

Saudi Arabia will fight off Iran all the way down to the last American if need be.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 13:18:43

Bahahahahahahaha … what is really funny is the U.S. going from having a War Department to having a Defense Department.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 13:32:22

but if we dont need their oil any more….

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-04 15:09:20

If the Saudi’s suddenly stopped producing then things would get “interesting”

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:40:16

Not all in on nuclear = don’t care about the Saudis.

 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-04 13:20:31

There is no way someone who won the Noble Peace Prize would do that…

OH WAIT…

 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 12:51:45

You only live once, why do it in Detroit or Chicago?

Comment by redmondjp
2016-01-04 14:23:45

Well, President O isn’t going back there. He’s already purchased his toe-tag home in beautiful, tropical Hawaii.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 20:55:29

Affordable housing?

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 13:12:00

Chinese investors run for the exit. Will the gov prevent this again? if so, then why do we consider the Yuan worthy to be traded for real property in the USA?

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 14:29:48

If you look at the national maps of support for Donald Trump, you’ll see that the poorer, less educated parts of the USA are among his strongest regions. And now with the Internet, they have a voice.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:41:40

Look at maps of Mexico and China for those supporting Cankles.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 18:57:40

The man knows morons, and how to exploit their fear, I’ll give him that.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 20:57:07

There is something comforting about a presidential candidate who is smart enough to exploit morons, as opposed to a candidate who himself is a moron.

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2016-01-04 14:45:12

My parents just moved their money (all of it) to money market.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 15:00:49

Are they Chinese?

 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 14:59:48

Is the stock market reacting to a GOP goofball as POTUS? Things have gone downhill since 2014 and the GOP congress.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 15:23:47

More like chinese goofballs unable to command their stock market to rise.

 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2016-01-04 16:07:49

Can some of you liberal folks help me out here. I need to know whom to blame if Trump is elected. I guess everything will be his fault? Or will the problems still be Bush’s fault? If Hillary is elected, will she finally solve all of America’s problems? Or will she need another 4 years after her first 4 years to accomplish her agenda? Will her 8 years plus Obama’s 8 years be enough to accomplish stuff? Or will we still be able to safely blame Bush and Reagan?
I’m going to predict that if a Republican wins the election, our SJWs will blame everything on him, while if a Democrat wins, our SJWs will blame everything on Bush.
You heard it her, first.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:33:16

Lola’s been blaming Reagan and ignoring Bubba’s tenure for years.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 18:05:52

Simple. Blame Bush for:
Wars
Patriot Act
Deficit
Dick Cheney
too big too fail
Iraq Treaty
Saudi love
no child left behind failure
Recession

Obama:
ACA
not jailing bankers
Trump:
WWIII
Deficit spending

(need more space)

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 18:37:21

Lola and Liberace:

Street crimes
Venereal diseases
Dumbing down of America

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:45:30

Also drones and millions of illegals

 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-04 16:34:12

Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-03 12:03:46

Vacate the banks and vacate the vote. Ignore the sociopaths who want to rule over others. Grow a set of balls. Fractional reserve is a big ripoff that plunders the world. Starve the beast.

Bill, last I heard, you had a SIGNIFICANT nest-egg invested in the markets, in both stocks and bonds. That makes you deeply invested in the current system, and strongly benefiting from it. In other words, you are an owner of the current system.

Discuss.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-04 16:44:35

Bill, just South of Irvine = A Voice in da Wilderness.

That 95% of the population never listens to (which makes me VERY happy).

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 17:37:00

Bill wants to free ride as a one man island in a society of others contributing. He needs to invest in LOVE so he has a network of those who care about him when he gets older. Otherwise it’s the care facility with no visitors and no one to check if you are getting your money’s worth other than government regulators of nursing homes who come by once a year, if that. Also no one to check if they money in the bank is being robbed away.

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 20:47:44

Last I checked. JNJ, Apple, Southwest Airlines, Google, Exxon, Microsoft are not banks.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-05 10:09:46

So it is only the banking system that you reject? Your critique of the system sounded broader to my ear—e.g. what does fractional reserve have to do with not voting?

 
 
 
Comment by Mike in Carlsbad
2016-01-04 17:30:35

Isn’t it about time our Justice department started putting people in jail?

—- Knapp Gets 6 1/2 Years for S&L Fraud : Thrifts: The once high-flying chief of American Savings is also ordered to pay $11 million in restitution.
December 15, 1993|JAMES F. PELTZ | TIMES STAFF WRITER
Email
Share

Charles W. Knapp, the maverick money man who once headed the nation’s largest savings and loan, was sentenced Tuesday to 6 1/2 years in prison for duping an Arizona savings and loan into lending him $15 million.

Knapp, 59, was also ordered to pay $11 million in restitution–a sum prosecutors claimed was the amount Western Savings & Loan in Phoenix lost on the Knapp loan.

The stiff sentence, handed down by U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson in Los Angeles, followed Knapp’s conviction in July on two criminal counts of making false statements and one count of conspiracy.

Knapp–wearing a gray suit, white shirt, maroon tie and wire-rimmed glasses–sat stiffly and showed no reaction as the sentence was read. He remains free on bail until he must surrender Jan. 18. Wilson, acting on a request by Knapp’s lawyer, recommended that Knapp be sent to a federal prison in Pleasanton, Calif. Knapp turned down Wilson’s invitation to speak to the court before sentencing. After the hearing, Knapp said he intends to appeal but declined to comment further.

Before issuing the sentence, Wilson chided Knapp for having “no qualms” about using crime “to salvage his crumbling financial empire.” The judge called it “an egregious offense that was callously committed by a sophisticated defendant.”

Bill Morgan, a former business associate of Knapp’s until they had a bitter falling-out and who testified against Knapp during his trial, said in an interview that Knapp “got exactly what he deserved.”

“When it comes to robbing banks, the only difference between Charlie Knapp and Jesse James is that Jesse used a gun and Charlie used a fountain pen,” Morgan said.

Mark S. Dodge, who worked with Knapp at Trafalgar Holdings, a Los Angeles investment firm Knapp formed, said after the hearing that he had mixed emotions about Knapp’s downfall. Dodge left Trafalgar before the Western Savings loan was made.

*

“The years I was with him were beneficial to me in many ways,” Dodge said. “But I also feel he did take advantage of, and victimize, a lot of people when he became a desperate person. It was so needless. He had everything at one point in his life.”

Two of Knapp’s former business associates were also convicted in the case. One, Anthony C. Sarno, was sentenced Tuesday to 5 1/4 years in prison and ordered to pay $500,000 in restitution. The other, Joseph V. Nash, had his sentencing delayed a week.

Knapp becomes the latest major figure of the nation’s S&L debacle to be sent to prison on criminal charges.

In July, Charles H. Keating Jr. got a 12-year, seven-month prison term for looting Lincoln Savings & Loan. But in Knapp’s case, his conviction was not related to his stewardship of Financial Corp. of America and its Stockton-based American Savings & Loan, which Knapp built into the largest U.S. thrift.

Regulators ousted Knapp from his job in 1984, and American Savings eventually collapsed because of a mountain of bad loans made during the Knapp era. But no criminal charges were ever filed in connection with the case.

Instead, Knapp got into trouble after forming Trafalgar.

He was found guilty of conspiring to concoct financial statements that grossly overstated the assets of one of his Trafalgar units so it could qualify for the unsecured loan from Western Savings in 1988.

The assistant U.S. attorneys who prosecuted the case, David J. Schindler and Carolyn J. Kubota, alleged that the loan was never repaid and that Knapp never intended to repay it. They also said the loan contributed to Western Savings’ 1989 collapse, which cost U.S. taxpayers about $500 million.

Knapp, a charming, flamboyant financier who piloted vintage airplanes and cruised on his yacht in the Mediterranean, had a free-wheeling style at American Savings that made him a role model for other executives who wanted to rapidly expand their newly deregulated savings and loans.

*

After being ousted from American Savings, Knapp hoped Trafalgar could become a major force in financing corporate takeovers, but prosecutors alleged that by mid-1988, Knapp and Trafalgar were “flat-out broke” when Knapp secured the Western Savings loan and that at least $1 million of the loan went toward Knapp’s own expenses.

Trafalgar dissolved as Knapp’s personal financial problems began mounting three years ago, and he and his wife, actress Lois Hamilton, filed for personal bankruptcy protection in September, 1992. But prosecutors claim Knapp still has a net worth in the millions of dollars.

Knapp said Hamilton filed for divorce in July, near the time of his conviction.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:47:28

Bank fraud statute of limitations is 10 years, they still got plenty of time for stuff done during the big bubble. Zero chance it will happen.

 
 
Comment by Donald Trump
2016-01-04 17:41:26

Show me someone without an ego, and I’ll show you a loser.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 17:50:58

Mother Teresa, the Pope, Steven Hawking….

Comment by Michael Viking
2016-01-04 18:15:51

Mother Teresa

Ever watched the Penn and Teller “Bullsh!t” episode on her? “Penn and Teller reveal that Mahatma Ghandi was a racist, Mother Teresa a religious zealot who was happy to see the poor suffer, and that the Dalai Lama is not as squeaky clean as he seems. “

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-04 18:48:28

Google Christopher Hitchens and Mother Theresa.

Bringing up the pope outs you as Lola also.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 19:22:29

look Lola, religion, sheeple and the GOP go hand in hand with their alter boys.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 19:21:27

i am a fiscal conservative, religion is a joke to those with strong minds

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 20:14:43

“religion is a joke to those with strong minds”

Then CalifoH20 must have strong religious convictions.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 20:59:09

I’d argue they all have strong egos, however humble their exteriors.

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 18:03:49

Lola, Liberace and few other hopeless types around here.

 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-04 18:35:06

looks like the PPT came to the rescue the last hr of trading again.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 18:42:06

It’s -1 degrees right now.

So much for global warming.

Comment by azdude
2016-01-04 19:26:40

people should do the opposite of whatever u r doing and they will make money hand over fist.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-04 19:33:42

Houses depreciate Poet…… houses depreciate rapidly.

Edwards, CO Housing Prices Crater 6% YoY

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 20:25:29

“do the opposite of whatever u r doing and they will make money hand over fist.”

George Costanza Does the Opposite - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RerJWv5vwxc - 187k -

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 20:37:28

I forgot how funny this was.

George Costanza - The Opposite 1.mov - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vyb5dkQZPw - 249k -

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-04 19:13:18

This is the typical hypocrite-Republican:

As one of the leaders of a band of armed, anti-government activists who have taken over a National Park Service building in Oregon, Ammon Bundy has denounced the “tyranny” of the federal government. And he has brought a new round of attention to the anti-government militia movement that in 2014 rallied behind his father, Cliven Bundy, when the elder Bundy and armed supporters confronted federal agents in Nevada. But not long ago, Ammon Bundy sought out help from the government he now decries and received a federal small-business loan guarantee.

Ammon Bundy runs a Phoenix-based company called Valet Fleet Services LLC, which specializes in repairing and maintaining fleets of semitrucks throughout Arizona. On April 15, 2010—Tax Day, as it happens—Bundy’s business borrowed $530,000 through a Small Business Administration loan guarantee program.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-04 19:47:08

Government handouts aren’t handouts if you give them to somebody toting an AR15.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-04 20:03:33

Obama Calls Executive Actions on Guns ‘Consistent’ with Second Amendment

President says proposal “well within my legal authority and the executive branch”

Mikael Thalen | Infowars.com - January 4, 2016 574 Comments

President Obama labeled his upcoming executive actions on gun control “consistent with the Second Amendment” Monday during a public address from the Oval Office.

“I’m… confident that the recommendations that are being made by my team here are ones that are entirely consistent with the Second Amendment and people’s lawful right to bear arms,” the president said.

Obama defended the proposed actions, which have yet to be specified, following a meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.

“These are not only recommendations that are well within my legal authority and the executive branch but they’re also ones that the overwhelming majority of the American people, including gun owners, support…” he added.

According to reports, President Obama is expected to expand background checks while also barring Americans secretly placed on the government’s controversial no-fly list from purchasing firearms.

The president, who also argued that bypassing Congress would “potentially save lives,” plans to announce the executive actions “over the next several days.”

Despite President Obama’s insistent stance on gun control, a new Gallup poll found that only 2 percent of Americans view “guns” and “gun control” as a major issue facing the country. In contrast, 16 percent of Americans agreed that the government itself was the “top problem.”

Multiple Republican lawmakers, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott, have vocally protested the president’s plan.

“Obama wants to impose more gun control,” Abbott tweeted Friday. “My response? COME & TAKE IT.”

 
Comment by Bill, just South of Irvine
2016-01-04 20:16:51

Bail ins in U.K. before the USA. IT IS NEAR. If this article does not get your money out of U.S. banks and into crypto and precious metals, you are are a state worshipper.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/tax/10819885/David-Cameron-Taxes-will-rise-unless-we-can-raid-bank-accounts.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 21:03:02

El moment es verdad…

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 21:07:16

Markets | Mon Jan 4, 2016 9:38pm EST
Related: China
China stocks face moment of truth after unprecedented trading halt
SHANGHAI | By Pete Sweeney and Samuel Shen
A man walks past a panel displaying the benchmark Hang Seng index during afternoon trading in Hong Kong, China January 4, 2016.
Reuters/Bobby Yip

China’s six-month-old campaign to calm share markets will be put to the test when stocks reopen on Tuesday, a day after selling triggered an unprecedented trading halt and risked undermining state rescue efforts estimated to have cost around $140 billion.

China’s major stock exchanges tanked on the first trading day of the year on Monday, triggering a “circuit-breaker” that halted equities trade nationwide for the first time and put at risk months of regulatory work to restore market stability.

The selloff saw the CSI300 index of the largest listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen lose 7.0 percent before trading was suspended, its worst single-day performance since late August 2015, the depth of a summer stock market rout.

And more weakness may be in the cards on Tuesday if the behavior of a U.S. exchange-traded funds tracking mainland China shares is a guide. The Deutsche X-trackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF slumped nearly 10 percent in U.S. trading, hitting its lowest since October 2014, before ending the session down 8.5 percent.

Shares of several Chinese firms that trade primarily in U.S. markets, and are not subject to Chinese trading restrictions, slumped as well. Alibaba Group Holdings Ltd (BABA.N) shed 5.6 percent and Baidu Inc. fell by 2.7 percent. The Bank of New York Mellon China ADR Index lost 4.0 percent.

The collapse, which followed the release of weak economic data, raises fresh doubts about regulators’ capacity to wind back trading restrictions implemented in the wake of a summer stock market crash in which major indexes lost as much as 40 percent before Beijing intervened.

Many analysts attributed the decline to the imminent end of a six-month lockup on share sales by big institutional investors.

Major Chinese brokerages and asset management firms spent vast sums to buy up shares during the crash in a state-coordinated rescue that Goldman Sachs estimated at the time to have cost around 900 billion yuan ($138 billion).

This is quite unexpected,” said Gu Yongtao, strategist at Cinda Securities, said of Monday’s fresh sell-off.

The slump apparently triggered intensified selling, while the trigger of the circuit breaker seems to have heightened panic, as liquidity was suddenly gone and this is something no one has experienced before. It was a stampede.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 21:10:07

Business
It’s the worst day first day of the year for U.S stocks since 1932

A concerned Chinese investor looks at prices of shares (green for price falling) at a stock brokerage house in Hangzhou city, east China’s Zhejiang province, 4 January 2016.
Image: Imaginechina/Associated Press
By Jason Abbruzzese
12 hours ago

In the Chinese calendar, 2016 will be the year of the monkey. It may also be the year where China has to address the monkey on its back.

China’s stock market has opened the year with a crash, opening up a new frontier of nervousness about one of the world’s most financially powerful countries. Chinese consumers play a big role in fueling sales of of fashion, technology, and cars, so many international companies from Apple to Burger King carefully watch the country to watch their own prospects. A Mashable explainer on China’s economic troubles can be found here.

The fears, which started last summer, started anew when the Shanghai Composite Index — China’s equivalent of the Dow Jones Industrial Average — dropped 7% on Monday, which then created a global downturn in stocks.

The China decline meant a rough start to the year for the U.S. stock market, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping by more than 340 points by early afternoon on Monday. The Nasdaq Composite Index of tech stocks and the broader S&P 500 suffered similar drops, off 2.4% and 1.9% respectively.

Unless there’s a rebound, it will be the first first day of the year for the DJIA since 1932.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 23:33:21

Happy Chinese New Year and Christmas!

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 23:34:46

China regulators flood markets with cash
Leslie Shaffer
8 Mins Ago
CNBC.com
Yuan currency China

Chinese authorities Tuesday flooded the banking system with the largest cash injection since September, likely helping soothe equity markets a day after a stock rout that rocked global financial markets.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) injected 130 billion yuan ($19.95 billion) during its open market operations. A Dow Jones report Tuesday noted that the move followed a PBOC decision Monday to not renew a credit line of the same amount to policy bank China Development Bank, a move which may have spurred investor worries that the central bank might tighten policy.

“Around this time of year, the PBOC does typically do large repo injections just for seasonal reasons,” noted Julian Evans-Pritchard, a China economist at Capital Economics, citing an increase in demand for cash for the Lunar New Year holiday period. “That said, it seems a bit early to do that now given Chinese New Year is still a few weeks away. There might be an element of easing liquidity conditions a bit following the stock market fall yesterday.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-04 23:48:13

Chinese plunge protection is failing, as prices keep falling.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-05 00:06:08

$20 bn has been dumped into the Chinese markets to prop up share prices. (Source: BBC NEWS)

 
 
 
Comment by It will get worse!
2016-01-05 00:14:45

For all the complaining snowflakes here, things will only get worse! Americans today have no idea what real suffering is or what a bad economy looks like. There are countless snarky posers on the internet who seem to think that they are wise or smart, but their only qualifications are that they hang out at websites like this.

The present world economy is a product of lots of things, but everything probably points back to China. No one understands anything about the “world economy” since economics isn’t a science. But lots of wealth has been created and it seems that the good times can’t last forever.

Countless people, governments and businesses are overextended and I bet that this is not going to end well. However, if there’s anything that can be learned by examining history, it’s that people will continue to make the same mistakes over and over.

My parents lived through the Great Depression and World War II. People born post WW II don’t know what hard times are. I can’t wait for the show to begin.

Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-05 09:09:51

We’ve all moved on to today’s bits bucket, fool. Why taunt an empty room?

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post