January 14, 2016

Bits Bucket for January 14, 2016

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here. Please visit my Youtube channel which you can also find here:

http:tinyurl.com/http-hbb-com




RSS feed

285 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 03:44:21

Did you miss out on the chance to win the Powerball jackpot?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 03:51:37

DEVELOPING
News
Jan 14 2016, 4:00 am ET
Powerball Jackpot: Winning Tickets in $1.5 Billion Lottery Sold in Calif., Fla., Tenn.
by Phil Helsel

History’s largest-ever lottery jackpot has at least three lucky winners.

Three states — California, Florida and Tennessee — sold winning tickets for the monster $1.58 billion Powerball lottery, according to California lottery spokesman Russ Lopez,

Six numbers — 08, 27, 34, 04, 19 — and Powerball 10 were drawn Wednesday night in the historic lottery event.

The three winners will split the colossal jackpot resulting in $528.8 million prize for each, according to officials.

One of the winning tickets was sold at a 7-Eleven in Chino Hills, California, officials said.

Local TV helicopters captured images of a large crowd of people gathering at the 7-Eleven, with crowds chanting “Chino Hills! Chino Hills!”

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-14 05:56:47

“One of the winning tickets was sold at a 7-Eleven in Chino Hills, California, officials said.

“Local TV helicopters captured images of a large crowd of people gathering at the 7-Eleven, with crowds chanting
‘Chino Hills! Chino Hills!’”

Bahahahahaha … I’ll bet they did! They, the residents of Chino Hills, sound as if they have the mentality of “WE won $528.8 million dollars”.

Let’s wait and watch to see just how “lucky” the winner in Chino Hills turns out to be. Let’s see if he has what it takes to “stand” prosperity. The odds are good that he doesn’t.

Stay tuned.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 06:01:21

Let’s wait and watch to see just how “lucky” the winner in Chino Hills turns out to be. Let’s see if he has what it takes to “stand” prosperity. The odds are good that he doesn’t.

That’s a bizarre sentiment. What the heck do you mean?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-14 06:07:04

I mean many people just cannot stand prosperity, especially when prosperity is something that is new to them and comes suddenly to them.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 06:35:13

I believe what he means is that most lottery winners soon learn that buckets of money is no ticket to happiness.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 06:50:09

Prosperity is much nicer then poverty. Very, very few people would disagree with that sentiment.

 
Comment by ibbots
2016-01-14 06:58:52

The main thing for lottery winners is to maintain anonymity. otherwise, they can count on the tremendous amount of unsolicited Invitations for donations, people jumping out in front of their car, etc.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:02:18

Mike, stop acting lie a know-it-all bully and read a little more.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:05:29

adventures in classic psychology
January 13, 2016 1:16 p.m.
Classic Psychology Study on Why Winning the Lottery Won’t Make You Happier
By Melissa Dahl
A woman buys a Powerball lottery ticket at a newsstand in New York City on January 12, 2016.
Photo: Kena Betancur/AFP/Getty Images

Someone could win the $1.5 billion Powerball jackpot tonight, though as killjoys across the internet have already noted, that someone will likely not be you. But let’s say some other massive upswing in good fortune comes your way this year. What happens to a person’s emotional life after winning the lottery, literally or metaphorically?

In 1978, a trio of researchers at Northwestern University and the University of Massachusetts attempted to answer this by asking two very disparate groups about the happiness in their lives: recent winners of the Illinois State Lottery — whose prizes ranged from $50,000 to $1 million — and recent victims of catastrophic accidents, who were now paraplegic or quadriplegic. In interviews with the experimenters, the two groups were asked, among other things, to rate the amount of pleasure they got from everyday activities: small but enjoyable things like chatting with a friend, watching TV, eating breakfast, laughing at a joke, or receiving a compliment. When the researchers analyzed their results, they found that the recent accident victims reported gaining more happiness from these everyday pleasures than the lottery winners.

This is how the study is usually written about, in a “gee whiz, ain’t that counterintuitive?” kind of tone. But what’s really striking when you look at the results reported by the researchers is how close their answers actually are: On average, the winners’ ratings of everyday happiness were 3.33 out of 5, and the accident victims’ averaged answers were 3.48. The lottery winners did report more present happiness than the accident victims (an average of 4 out of 5, as compared to the victims’ 2.96), but as the authors note, “the paraplegic rating of present happiness is still above the midpoint of the scale and … the accident victims did not appear nearly as unhappy as might have been expected.”

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 07:14:15

“Mike, stop acting lie a know-it-all bully and read a little more.”

Well he is a Better, and as you know a Better just knows better.

Look at Dumbo in Brooklyn, the Betters know that if their kids had to go to school with “low test score” kids from the projects it would not be better, it would be worse.

So as you can plainly see the Betters always know better.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 07:20:49

I was disagreeing with Mr. Banker, who was making a different point, I think, than you were, Professor.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:31:07

Those studies about money not buying happiness have been shown to be flawed and incorrect.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 07:43:01

Having money beats not having money, but being rich doesn’t make you happy, and being poor doesn’t make you unhappy. There are plenty of rich gloomy bast@rds, and plenty of cheerful happy poor people.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 08:30:55

Cheerful happy poor people stay cheerful until an unexpected expense forces them to go homeless. I know of some.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 08:36:01

Unhappy rich people do hate the happy poor, though.

 
Comment by Ann Gogh
2016-01-14 09:43:06

I’m rich and I’m miserable! But at least i have enough money to pay my obamabills and taxes!

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2016-01-14 09:48:33

One thing that money can’t buy is poverty.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 09:50:41

Too bad you blew every last dollar on that rapidly depreciating shanty at a grossly inflated price Rental_Frau.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:16:50

I’ve read a little about this research. For example, that CEO in Seattle who decided to institute a corporate minimum salary of $70,000 did so because he read about studies that show money can buy happiness up to that level of income. Mr. Banker appears to think that lottery jackpots can lead to a decrease in happiness. I doubt that that’s supported by any research.

 
 
Comment by salinasron
2016-01-14 09:48:45

It would take me about 6 months of preparation before cashing in that ticket. A lot of legal preparation, what tax exempt state to avoid taxes, where to safely park the money, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jbunniii
2016-01-14 12:01:35

Let’s wait and watch to see just how “lucky” the winner in Chino Hills turns out to be.

Let’s see how long it takes before he moves out of Chino Hills…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 15:14:20

I wonder if he will get not only a trampoline, but a huge above ground pool–mafia high living style.

I’d head for Tuscany, lay low for a year and travel.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 15:46:04

Instead you’ll remain in the meat packing districut bumming cigarettes on the stroll.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 18:07:31

Instead you’ll remain in the meat packing districut bumming cigarettes on the stroll.

very specific details we dont need to know about you

funnyshet!

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 18:25:57

And that’s where you’ll stay.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 05:29:25

Renters win the lottery every day of their lives.

People with mortgages have a lifetime of incalculable losses.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 08:28:25

I won a jackpot by dollar cost averaging over fifteen years into the S&P 500 index fund.

Comment by Overbanked
2016-01-14 13:03:51

But you are also a market timer, correct?

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 20:58:25

Yes but with a very small amount compared to what I have in mutual funds. I had luck on company stock and gained over $100k mostly long term. I don’t expect that to happen again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:42:44

Record High Lottery Prize Brings Alabamians to Florida to Buy Tickets
January 13, 2016
by Caitlyn Cline

Even though Alabama legislature is still debating on having a lottery in Alabama, that is not stopping many Alabamians from playing the game. Currently the jackpot is set at a record $1.5 billion dollars.

When Rhett Joyner took over R & R State Line Lotto, he never imagined most of his revenue would come from out of state ticket sales.

“Most of our business is Alabama. I would say 80 percent of our business is residents from Alabama,” Joyner says. The line in the lotto store stretches out the front door and into the parking lot, something Joyner says happens daily since the Powerball numbers increased.

“We’re so close to so many small communities, that it’s just, you know, a drive over,” Joyner says. “It’s six miles from the Alabama state line.”

Nearly every car in the parking lot sports a Alabama license plate, and most players drive miles just for a chance to win.

“When I lived in Mobile, we would go to the Florida line fairly often, but since moving to Wilcox County, which is in the middle of the state, I haven’t played lotto in years,” says Virginia Dailey. Dailey might not think she is a professional player, but she won a hundred dollars on a one dollar scratch off ticket while in Joyner’s store.
The odds of winning the lottery are one in 292.2 million, but that has not stopped anyone from stopping in to buy a ticket at R & R State Line Lotto.

“You know, if you really think about it, why not? You know, you can’t win if you don’t play,” Joyner says with a laugh.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:45:07

Google is amazingly smart!

For an example, ask it to calculate the number of different possible Powerball number combinations by entering this on the search line:

(69 choose 5)*(26 choose 1)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 03:56:47

Any insights on why Mr Market is so glum in early 2016?

Is it merely a matter of liftoff lividity on Wall Street, akin to the taper tantrum of a couple of years ago?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:07:25

Is it best to just sell everything, or to ride the falling knife all the way to the ground?

Why it’s wrong to sell everything when markets fall
By Anora Mahmudova
Published: Jan 13, 2016 2:56 p.m. ET
‘Too many variables affect the price in the short term’
Timing markets correctly rarely works over time

The drumbeat of bearishness is reaching a crescendo. Scary, attention-grabbing headlines have become the norm in a market overwhelmed by fear after U.S. stocks kicked off 2016 with the worst calendar-year beginning ever. And it isn’t as if 2015’s returns were anything to be cheerful about.

Regular readers on MarketWatch, for example, have been subjected to headlines ranging from it isn’t a good time to buy to the more extreme calls to sell everything.

But for average investors with a retirement account or 401(k) plan, those recommendations aren’t exactly helpful, according to Michael Batnick, who runs financial blog The Irrelevant Investor and is director of research at Ritholtz Wealth Management.

“For a lay person, the ‘sell everything’ type of stories have no value and are pure entertainment and should be taken as such,” Batnick said.

In a recent blog post, Batnick attempts to put the current rout in the market — which he admits may turn deeper — into a historical context, explaining why short-term fluctuations should be ignored.

In a chart, dating back to 1926, Batnick shows annual returns for the S&P 500 (SPX, -2.50%) and points to three distinct secular bear markets. A secular bear market is a trend when prices fall or move sideways for years or even decades to regain their last peak.

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-14 05:44:20

It is best to have sold some in Jan. 2015 and some more in June 2015. Now it is time to start buying!

Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 06:04:01

start buying? this bear market is just getting started.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 02:53:01

Just bought Invesco Energy Class A. $19. Seemed like a good opportunity. We shall see!

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 06:30:44

Buying into a Ponzi market? Are you on crack?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Puggs
2016-01-14 11:55:52

Buying now is like high retail, dude. And you know what they say…”retail is for suckers”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 12:45:28

not many real investors on here it seems. they always talk themselves out of buying after a drop. first you need to save some $$.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 14:06:15

not many real investors on here it seems. they always talk themselves out of buying after a drop……this bear market is just getting started.

The Brazil bear market is about 5 years old. I haven’t owned Brazilian stocks for about a decade but I’m going to start dollar cost averaging into them next week. I see a 10% currency/20% downside risk and a potential 40% upside risk in the next 18 months. I’ll go max 8-10% of my investing assets in it over about a year. Looking at maybe a 5 year hold. Buy when there’s blood in the streets. (There has been literally and maybe more soon.)

iShares MSCI Brazil Capped (EWZ) Down over 75% the past 5 years.

19.05 +0.47(+2.50%)
Prev Close 18.58
High 19.06
Open 18.60
Low 18.41
52 Wk Low 18.405
52 Wk High 38.2

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 14:28:33

Can I buy beachfront property there for $10k yet? Or a nice coffee bean ranch?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 15:22:28

Can I buy beachfront property there for $10k yet?

In Brazil? You always could. Just not around anywhere any Gringos would want to.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 02:58:41

“…….they always talk themselves out of buying after a drop. first you need to save some $$.”

+1,000,000.

No ticki….no washy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:37:48

European stocks set to hit 1-year low as oil, China spook investors
By Sara Sjolin
Published: Jan 14, 2016 5:17 a.m. ET

European stock markets slumped on Thursday, as investors continued to fret about the ongoing selloff in oil prices and choppy Chinese markets.

The Stoxx Europe 600 index (SXXP, -3.16%) dropped 2.5% to 336.06, setting it on track for the lowest close since January 2015, according to FactSet data.

The steep loss comes after the pan-European benchmark mustered gains over the two previous sessions on the back of calmer markets in China.

“Investors have once again realized that nothing has changed and a bounce wasn’t really warranted,” said Mike van Dulken, head of research at Accendo Markets, in a note.

“A depressed oil price remains hindered by global oversupply and the prospect of it getting worse as Iran returns to market, while China jitters continue to shake everything from commodities to financials,” he added.

 
Comment by Larry Littlefield
2016-01-14 07:29:05

Everything is overpriced and everybody knows it. Everyone is just waiting the dog whistle to get out ahead of the suckers.

The only thing inflating asset prices now is flight capital from places where the collapse is greater.

How much do you believe deflation? Are you willing to buy and lock in a 2 percent dividend yield and a 2 percent bond yield — minus taxes? Or do you think you are entitled to more, and will wait it out until you can get it?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 08:01:23

Dang…the Dow is dropping again. Whatever happened to the January effect?

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 03:03:10

This IS January…. And this is is the effect! Last January was for selling ($17,500). This one is for buying ($16,000).

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:09:51

What’s cheaper: Oil or bottled water?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:14:00

Finance
Oil price crash means petrol could become cheaper than bottled water
Petrol prices could head back to their lowest level in seven years
By Mehreen Khan
12:01AM GMT 14 Jan 2016
Brent crude prices fall below $30 for the first time since April 2004 and could make fuel cheaper than water

Petrol will soon cost less than bottled water as the relentless decline in oil prices sends fuel down to 86p a litre, it has been claimed.

Brent crude fell to below $30 a barrel for the first time since 2004 on Wednesday evening - and has fallen by more 73pc since reaching highs of $115 last summer.

Motoring group RAC said pump prices now could fall back to levels last seen in the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2009, if the commodity plunges to as low as $10, a forecast made by Standard Chartered bank earlier this week.

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-14 04:55:33

The price of oil is now below the long term trend line. I am starting to buy Inesco Energy Class A and VDE. The lower it goes, the more I buy.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 05:19:49

Buy high and sell low. Sounds like your strategy Jingle_Fraud.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-14 05:49:25

Did you get to your ESL class last night, because you need reading lessons. I sold high last year. Now I am starting to buy low.

You just keep renting HA!

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 05:51:44

You can’t keep your stories straight Jingle_Fraud.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 06:07:23

It looks like our short term memory day traders are all in. Possibly they have no idea where “long term trend” is, or the crater beneath it.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 06:24:56

There are so many on here that have this day trader mentality.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 10:46:13

Degenerate gamblers.

Oil is priced many multiples over production cost and oil demand continues to collapse.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 03:06:33

HA!, Ha!, ha………if only you knew something useful!

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-15 04:10:40

degenerate.gambler.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:46:49

Oil wavers on jitters over U.S. inventories, Iran supply
By Biman Mukherji and Georgi Kantchev
Published: Jan 14, 2016 5:55 a.m. ET
Don’t be surprised to see Brent hit $25: analyst
Reuters
Gas field in Asalouyeh Seaport, north of Persian Gulf,

Oil prices switched between gains and losses on Thursday amid concerns about swelling U.S. inventories and the return of Iranian barrels to the market.

By midmorning in Europe, Brent was up 0.3% at $30.40 a barrel on London’s ICE Futures exchange, having fallen as low as $29.73 a barrel earlier in the session. On the New York Mercantile Exchange, West Texas Intermediate futures were trading up 0.7% at $30.69 a barrel.

This week, both contracts breached the key $30 a barrel level for the first time in more than a decade.

Analysts say international sanctions against Tehran’s nuclear program could be lifted as soon as this weekend. That would pave the way for an increase of Iranian oil exports, which would add to the persistent oversupply of crude around the globe.

“Most of the bearishness is coming from worries over Iranian sanctions being lifted,” said Daniel Ang, an analyst with Phillip Futures. “I won’t be surprised if prices continue falling toward $25 per barrel.”

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:18:35

Has the Baltic Dry Index finally stabilized?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:23:41

Business Standard
More bad news for ocean trade
Aditi Divekar | Mumbai
Jan 14, 2016 12:15 AM IST
More-bad-news-for-ocean-trade
A fresh plunge on the main global index of the cost of moving major raw materials by sea has potential implications for trade.

The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) slid to a level of 402 on Wednesday, a new low, and this might stop much of trade across the Indian Ocean and Asia-Pacific market, say observers. There could be a strong aversion, for instance, to long-term deals.

The BDI is an economic indicator issued daily by the London-based Baltic Exchange.

“The trade climate is full of insecurity, as charterers are not sure if the price at which they have negotiated is the right low price,” Kiran Kamat, owner of Link Shipping & Management Systems, a leading chartering and shipping company, told Business Standard. “Charterers are unable to take a call, leading to last-minute back out (from deals), even if ship-owners are being flexible.”

The index began falling from early August last year, when China initiated a devaluing of its currency. From a high of 1,222, it has lost two-thirds in five months. Wednesday’s level is a three-decade low; the all-time high of 11,793 was on May 20, 2008. Since then, the index has been volatile, being down for much longer than thought likely.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:39:58

The Baltic Dry
Don’t Lie

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-14 05:08:29

I think you are on to something, PB. This index, posted in London, cuts through all the uncertainty about trusting Chinese numbers.

The index is dropping substantially! Down from 12,000 in 2008 to 1200 in 2015!

And now from 1200 to 402 in 5 months. That is a CR8TER!

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 05:25:59

lol.

All of a sudden the data has credibility after the fact? That’s priceless Jingle_Fraud.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 03:10:48

HA, if only you could say something useful. ALL data is “after the fact”. That is why it’s DATA. It happened and someone collected it. HA!

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-15 04:09:13

And the data has been trending in one direction for 14 months and now you publicly admit you’ve been backpedalling.

You’ll forever be known ad Jingle_Fraud.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-16 02:45:04

If only you could post something useful. HA!

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-18 12:37:46

If only you could post something truthful Jingle_Fraud.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:54:31

ft dot com > Comment >
Columnists
January 14, 2016 4:35 pm
Shipping’s globalisation woes
Gillian Tett

- For sign of how the tectonic plates of the global economy are shifting, look at the Baltic Dry Index

- A general view of containers on a container ship at the Port of Qingdao, eastern China’s Shandong province, China

This week, the eyes of investors have been fixed on tumbling oil prices. Little wonder: with oil now costing as little as $30 a barrel, 15 per cent down since the start of the year, energy markets are signalling trouble ahead — particularly given the continuing turmoil in China.

For another sign of how the tectonic plates are shifting in the global economy, try looking at the Baltic Dry Index, which measures the cost of shipping raw materials such as coal, metal and fertilisers across the globe.

Normally, this does not attract much public attention; after all, in an era where investors are obsessed with capital flows — or the latest digital gadgets — it seems rather retro to focus on the humdrum details of harbours and containers.

But right now, the behaviour of that Baltic index is almost as dramatic as those oil prices. This week, the index fell below 400 for the first time since records began in 1985, after several weeks of steady declines. Last summer the index was well above 1,000, in 2010 it was around 4,000. So if you are gripped by a desire to dispatch a cargo of coal, cement or oil across the seas, it will currently cost you less than it has for at least 30 years.

Now, it would be nice to think that this is just another sign of our modern technological revolution. But the key reason why shipping prices are falling so fast is that the patterns of modern trade and global growth are not behaving in 2016 as western and emerging market financiers might have expected, or as they did during earlier booms.

Over the past decade, shipping companies everywhere from Greece to China have expanded their dry bulk capacity. They did this partly because it was cheap for them to borrow money. New investors, such as western private equity funds, have also piled in, seeking innovative ways to deploy their cash.

The other reason for the boom was that it was widely assumed that global trade would keep expanding. Until recently, this assumption did not seem unreasonable. In the decade before 2008, global trade rose by an average of 7 per cent a year, faster than global GDP growth, because countries such as China were booming and western businesses were creating a web of cross-border supply chains.

History, however, does not unfold in predictable ways. As the World Bank described in a sobering report last week, global trade growth has slowed down sharply in recent years to around 3 per cent, or roughly the pace of global GDP expansion, and it is slowing further now.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:58:13

Baltic Dry Index falls to 383, down 11 points.
in Dry Bulk Market 14/01/2016

Today, Thursday, January 14 2016, the Baltic Dry Index decreased by 11 points, reaching 383 points.

Baltic Dry Index is compiled by the London-based Baltic Exchange and covers prices for transported cargo such as coal, grain and iron ore. The index is based on a daily survey of agents all over the world. Baltic Dry hit a temporary peak on May 20, 2008, when the index hit 11,793. The lowest level ever reached was on Thursday, January 14 2016, when the index dropped to 383 points.

Source: Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 04:25:22

CRATER!

Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 05:31:48

Realtors are liars.

Comment by rj chicago
Comment by rms
2016-01-14 21:41:56

“The U.S Attorney’s Office said that as a consequence of his actions, Pasquale helped to cause a loss of approximately $937,000 to Wells Fargo Bank when the mortgages involved in the case went into foreclosure.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:26:44

Is the Chinese government badgering corporate managers to lie about the health of their firms?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 04:30:28

Markets
The Quiet Side of China’s Market Intervention
In addition to spending billions on stocks, Chinese officials quietly cajole companies to issue statements of support
By Shen Hong
Updated Jan. 13, 2016 9:11 p.m. ET

As Chinese markets tanked last week, China Inc. appeared to be rallying to their support.

At least 75 Chinese companies issued statements during the past week and a half, saying their biggest shareholders would be holding on to their stakes in order to protect investor interests.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 04:47:12

The luxury home market in NY and MIA is “threatened” by demands for transparency:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-14/luxury-home-market-seen-threatened-by-transparency-in-nyc-miami

Oh, fer cryin’ out loud, the market was already “threatened”. And oh, gee, I really feel sorry for those who might be “outed” by this. Cry me a river.

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-01-14 05:14:15

‘For luxury-home developers and brokers in Miami and Manhattan who are already contending with slumping prices and slowing demand…’

They’ve already milked the money-laundering fools and it’s time to shut the door.

‘Demand for Manhattan’s most-expensive homes is slipping while apartments from a high-end construction boom aimed at wealthy investors pile up on the market. Resale prices for the top 20 percent of the market peaked in February and have fallen every month since then.’

Just the other day it was reported that Manhattan condos it an all time high. Problem is, the price was simply closing on super expensive new units that had been closed months before they were finished.

‘The most expensive completed sale of an apartment in New York City, the $100.5 million purchase of a penthouse atop Extell Development Co.’s One57, was to a buyer known only as P89-90 LLC.’

‘The New York Times last year examined the increasing use of anonymous shell companies by global buyers seeking havens for cash. Among the findings were that 64 percent of condos at Manhattan’s Time Warner Center were owned by shell companies, and that at least 16 foreigners who have owned in the building have been targeted by government investigations. Secret buyers included former Russian senators, a Greek businessman who was arrested as part of a corruption sweep in his home country and a financier linked to the prime minister of Malaysia, according to the paper. Nationwide, almost half of the most-expensive homes are bought through shell companies, the Times reported.’

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-01-14 05:16:16

I posted this in the comments yesterday:

‘After five years of record growth, signs of stress are emerging in New York City’s real estate market, especially in the past three months. Although new office leasing hit 28.2 million square feet last year, the third-highest Manhattan total in a decade, the figure is 14% below 2014 levels, according to a year-end report from Cushman & Wakefield released Tuesday morning.’

‘The drop came as several of the bulwarks of the bull market—including a steep rise in retail rents and a booming property sales, from residential towers to development sites—lost steam. “Last year was a great year, but as we progressed we began to see some cracks emerging,” said Bob Knakal, the head of property sales for Cushman.’

‘While the dollar volume of such transactions soared to $74.5 billion last year, the number of transactions—the ultimate barometer of the market’s health—sagged. He noted that a decline in activity accelerated in the fourth quarter, and that such softness is now being reflected in prices of raw land. For example, he pointed to a couple of Manhattan properties that sellers thought would command prices of $700 to $800 per buildable square foot that had instead drawn bids of $600 to $625 per square foot. In both cases, the seller decided to put off the transaction.’

‘The weakness in the pricing of developed properties has been led by a cooling in the formerly white-hot market for retail space. Per-square-foot retail rents that topped out in four-digit-dollar sums in areas such as Fifth Avenue and Times Square have softened. That trend shows no sign of abating in 2016.’

“We do see a slowdown in rents and more vacancies,” said Joanne Podell, Cushman’s head of retail leasing. She noted that on the gilded strip of Fifth Avenue, the city’s priciest in terms of leasing cost per square foot, rents ebbed 8.5% last year. Meanwhile, in the trendy meatpacking district, the amount of retail space available to rent jumped nearly 20% last year. And farther south, in SoHo, she said that so many spaces are available that “much of the talk is about how difficult the market is.”

‘Steve Kohn, head of Cushman’s equity and debt market operation in New York, reported that it’s getting harder to finance construction, “especially for high-end condos.” On that score, Knakal noted that a big client he described as a firm that has built condos for decades recently told him flatly: “I will not buy real estate to build condos in 2016.”

‘As for himself, Knakal termed this year almost too tough to forecast. On the one hand, he pointed out that the moderate pace of economic growth in recent years could leave plenty of gas in the tank for further growth. On the other hand, he said, we face the risk “of a deflationary spiral.”

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 05:59:14

“the city’s priciest in terms of leasing cost per square foot, rents ebbed 8.5% last year.”

So a near double digit decline in Manhattan rental rates in 2015.

Imagine that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Larry Littlefield
2016-01-14 07:31:31

“After five years of record growth, signs of stress are emerging in New York City’s real estate market.”

Are they kidding? There has been massive stress due to overpricing.

My daughter now lives in the Midwest. My friend is considering closing his business when his lease expires, and just downsizing to freelancing at home in semi-retirement rather than doubling his monthly nut.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 05:25:12

The timing is interesting. Now that they’ve gotten all the money they can out of the luxury RE bubble and now that the air is leaking from the balloon, NOW they decide there’s a need for “transparency”.

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 05:28:26

Are all the horses safely out? Good. Shut that barn door!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 06:52:31

Manhattan luxury condos:

Where bad money from abroad goes to die…

 
 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-01-14 05:08:51

on the million dollar listing” shows some brokers were buying and one was even building a snazzy office building
=peakers

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 05:21:55

Looks like that Rainbow Coalition isn’t feelin’ the love in NY.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebrity/new-york-taxi-driver-accused-of-refusing-al-roker-is-fined/ar-CCpTJj?ocid=ansmsnent11

I could see the guy bypassing someone who looks like Snoop Dog, but Al Roker?? Oh, no, NOT Al Roker!

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-01-14 05:30:36

‘A quote from China’s architect of free market reforms, Deng Xiaoping, has resurfaced on the country’s social media after multiple trading halts failed to keep Chinese stocks from plunging in January, leading a rout in Asian equities and causing global markets to fall. “Certain aspects of capitalism can be adopted by socialism. We should not be worried about making mistakes,” the late Chinese leader said in a 1992 speech about opening the country’s first stock market.’

‘At the time, Deng had already set up special economic zones to experiment with capitalism, paving the way for the country to rapidly become the world’s second-largest economy. “If we fail we can close [the stock market] and re-open it later,” he said.’

‘Chinese internet users were sharing Deng’s comment to mock a short-lived “circuit breaker” mechanism that automatically shut down the country’s primary exchanges twice during the first week of the year.’

‘Online jokes expressed envy at the lifestyles of the country’s stockbrokers and investment companies: “Everyone sing along with me now: ‘A stockbroker’s job sure is great, other jobs cannot compare. In bull market time we make a lot of money, and in a bear market we get to go home early!’”

‘Meanwhile analysts writing in the country’s leading economic publications questioned the judgment of government regulators – arguing that frequent government intervention has only worsened panic and prevented the market from being able to correct itself. Some compared the regulators’ action to closing a casino early because gamblers were holding bad cards.’

‘To add to concerns, a recent Barclays report has warned of a possible housing bubble burst in China. The real estate market underwent rapid growth from 2000 to 2008, and is an important driver of the economy; however, vacancies are sharply rising, with many apartments standing empty. A collapse of the housing market could lead to a disastrous domino effect on areas such as banking and construction.’

“The circuit breaker fiasco was not the main reason for the current panic,” says Ye Tan, an independent analyst in Shanghai. “The fundamental reasons are the economy itself, poor performance of listed companies and the currency exchange rate drop.”

‘Then many seasoned investors pointed the finger at amateurs whom they said were borrowing money to invest and then panic-selling at the first signs of trouble. “I have been investing in stock markets in mainland China and Hong Kong for 16 years,” says Wang Feng, an investor in Beijing. “Those who jumped on the bandwagon and chose to buy inflated stocks cannot blame anyone but themselves.”

‘A viral joke at the time said: “These are the world’s most extreme sports for your heart: Rock climbing, bungee jumping, skydiving, skiing, surfing and China’s stock market.”

Other internet users posted possibly doctored photographs of firefighters looking at the top of a building and holding up a banner saying: “Don’t jump! Wait until the stocks go back up.”

Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 06:05:49

parachute sales must be doing well.

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 06:27:47

I don’t like to take shots at Abq Dan, especially since he’s not around and also, other than the China cheerleading, I rather liked the guy.

However, I do have to say that one of the funniest comments on this blog was yours the day China had its first major hiccup. Dan had posted a comment and your response was something like “Good morning, Dan, you’re up rather early today, it’s —oh, dear..”, followed by a link to the story on the Chinese stock market. I’m paraphrasing, but it did make me laugh.

Always felt that China was a paper tiger that was going to implode sooner or later. The sad thing to me is all that environmental wreckage they’re going to be left with. And for what?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:09:08

I sure wish Dan were here posting Rasmussen poll numbers for Trump. It could have been Hillaryous!

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:35:45

No other R can seem to surpass him. Only one close is Cruz in one state that has a shill caucus and not a vote.

But I know you are proHillary.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:40:48

I know you are full of shit.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:47:00

Only black-and-white thinkers for Trump believe that not groveling at The Donald’s feet is tantamount to supporting Hillary.

I dislike both of them.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 08:25:04

believe that not groveling at The Donald’s feet is tantamount to supporting Hillary.

It’s a logical fallacy (false either/or), and therefore a preferred argument technique of the unscrupulous.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 09:26:00

Trumplings gonna trumple.

 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-14 10:40:59

You may dislike both of them but at the end you will vote for Hillary like you are told.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 13:00:08

And the boo boo faces on the trumplings as they cry ‘boo hoo’ will be hilarious.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 18:02:36

Central Scrotalizer and Professor Pomposity will vote straight D with a cherry on top of Hillary.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:27:34

Contributing Op-Ed Writer
Why I Will Never Vote for Donald Trump
West Des Moines, Iowa
Jae C. Hong / Associated Press
January 14, 2016
Peter Wehner

Beginning with Ronald Reagan, I have voted Republican in every presidential election since I first became eligible to vote in 1980. I worked in the Reagan and George H. W. Bush administrations and in the White House for George W. Bush as a speechwriter and adviser. I have also worked for Republican presidential campaigns, although not this time around.

Despite this history, and in important ways because of it, I will not vote for Donald Trump if he wins the Republican nomination.

I should add that neither could I vote in good conscience for Hillary Clinton or any of the other Democrats running for president, since they oppose many of the things I have stood for in my career as a conservative — and, in the case of Mrs. Clinton, because I consider her an ethical wreck. If Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton were the Republican and Democratic nominees, I would prefer to vote for a responsible third-party alternative; absent that option, I would simply not cast a ballot for president. A lot of Republicans, I suspect, would do the same.

There are many reasons to abstain from voting for Mr. Trump if he is nominated, starting with the fact that he would be the most unqualified president in American history. Every one of our 44 presidents has had either government or military experience before being sworn in. Mr. Trump, a real estate mogul and former reality-television star, hasn’t served a day in public office or the armed forces.

During the course of this campaign he has repeatedly revealed his ignorance on basic matters of national interest — the three ways the United States is capable of firing nuclear weapons (by land, sea and air), the difference between the Quds Force in Iran and the Kurds to their west, North Korea’s nuclear tests, the causes of autism, the effects of his tax plan on the deficit and much besides.

Mr. Trump has no desire to acquaint himself with most issues, let alone master them. He has admitted that he doesn’t prepare for debates or study briefing books; he believes such things get in the way of a good performance. No major presidential candidate has ever been quite as disdainful of knowledge, as indifferent to facts, as untroubled by his benightedness.

It is little surprise, then, that many of Mr. Trump’s most celebrated pronouncements and promises — to quickly and “humanely” expel 11 million illegal immigrants, to force Mexico to pay for the wall he will build on our southern border, to defeat the Islamic State “very quickly” while as a bonus taking its oil, to bar Muslims from immigrating to the United States — are nativistic pipe dreams and public relations stunts.

Even more disqualifying is Mr. Trump’s temperament. He is erratic, inconsistent and unprincipled. He possesses a streak of crudity and cruelty that manifested itself in how he physically mocked a Times journalist with a disability, ridiculed Senator John McCain for being a P.O.W., made a reference to “blood” intended to degrade a female journalist and compared one of his opponents to a child molester.

Mr. Trump’s legendary narcissism would be comical were it not dangerous in someone seeking the nation’s highest office — as he demonstrated when he showered praise on the brutal, anti-American president of Russia, Vladimir V. Putin, responding to Mr. Putin’s expression of admiration for Mr. Trump.

“It is always a great honor,” Mr. Trump said last month, “to be so nicely complimented by a man so highly respected within his own country and beyond.”

 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 10:12:54

The sad thing to me is all that environmental wreckage they’re going to be left with.

Just think of all of the economic activity they can generate paying themselves to do environmental cleanup down the road!

(Kidding—I agree, it is both a tragedy and a travesty).

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 06:55:14

‘Some compared the regulators’ action to closing a casino early because gamblers were holding bad cards.’

They nailed it!

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 07:26:28

closing a casino early because gamblers were holding bad cards.’

More like closing the casino when everyone tries to cash in their chips.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 12:53:22

so…. did you short China and profit from your wisdom?

 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 05:47:59

John Kerry apologizing to Iran = Obama is a p*ssy, therefore a trillion dollar neocon war is needed. American taxpayers you’re getting played for suckers and fools.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 06:10:42

John Kerry apologizing to Iran = Obama is a p*ssy, therefore a trillion dollar neocon war is needed.

Good point. (Obliquely made as it is.)

Many American neo-cons are against the Iran Nuclear Deal because it can lesson the tensions between Iran and The USA - thus making war less probable. It looks like it did just that a couple days ago.

Sign of warmer relations : Iran releases 10 United States Navy sailors

http://diplomat.so/2016/01/13/sign-of-warmer-relations-irans-releases-10-united-states-navy-sailors/

Tehran,Iran ( Agencies + DIPLOMAT.SO)- Iran’s release of 10 United States Navy sailors on Wednesday, less than 24 hours after they were detained on the Persian Gulf, is being hailed in both countries as a sign that their relations have evolved since the signing of the nuclear accord last summer.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:36:56

Obama signed over the bomb to them, as did Hillary.

 
 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-14 10:42:38

I don’t think we be going to war with Iran but I don’t think we need to be groveling at their feet either.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 10:58:17

False either/or.

 
 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 06:02:03

Why buy a house when you can rent it for half the monthly cost?

Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 06:09:12

buying a house is like playing powerball thx to wall street.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 06:25:14

Lottery tickets require cash. Keep pulling on that housing debt wagon.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 11:06:25

Lottery tickets require cash.

Houses require cash too if you don’t want to rent and don’t want a mortgage.

I built my house by pulling CASH out of an ATM about 4 times a week. (For months and months.)

Cash’n'Build.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 12:51:45

Lola…. You couldn’t build a doghouse if I gave you the materials and 6 months.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 06:59:14

You can’t take use a government guaranteed subprime loan to pay for your Powerball tickets, UNLESS you first buy a home with the loan proceeds.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-14 06:10:24

This is important enough to post again:

—————-
Comment by Neuromance
2016-01-13 19:34:40
Neutralizing unfriendly pieces of Dodd Frank is a cottage industry in DC.

It sounded good when people were watching, but the defanging is done quietly and continuously.

https://www.cfpbmonitor.com/2015/11/23/house-passes-bill-to-curb-qm-requirements/
—————-

It’s a short but tough read, but basically, the bill would allow loan originators and banks to simply break the existing rules without fear of being sued. A bank could make a loan without following the LTV rules, a loan originator could steer a consumer into a risky loan, or still sell loans with a balloon payment. Don’t like a regulation? Pass a law to override.

Your Republican Congress at work.

Comment by taxpayers
2016-01-14 06:16:16

GOOD !-dodd frank is a disaster
I’d take Glass Stegal
better yet deregulate and let weak hands fail

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 06:38:50

President Bill Clinton, at the urging of his Wall Street-captured Treasury Secretary Rubin, led the charge to do away with Glass-Steagal, which led directly to the 2008 financial crisis. The Clintons subsequently amassed a fortune worth an estimated $200 million by giving speeches to audiences comprised of employees and officers of the financial firms that benefited the most from the repeal of Glass-Steagal and subsequent orgy of speculative excesses. Now with the talk of bringing back Glass-Steagal, the Clintons must be salivating at the prospect of reaping another financial windfall by having President Hillary Clinton continue the influence-peddling and crony capitalism where Bill left off. The ultimate loser, of course, will be the US taxpayer who ends up funding the next Wall Street bailout. But since 95% of ‘Murican voters have shown they will gladly and willingly bend over for Wall Street by voting for its water carriers, the banksters can gamble, defraud, and loot with impunity, knowing the Fed’s printing press and middle class taxpayers have their back.

 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-14 09:19:34

Dodd-Frank is only a disaster for bank profits.

I’m all for banks making any toxic or liar loan that they want, as long as they hold on to the loan themselves. And if they make too many loans and go belly up, that’s their fault.

But these banks want to make toxic and liar loans and sell them to Fannie Mae (taxpayers) with no skin in the game. Or, they want to keep the loans and cook the books until there are defaults and they need a bailout (taxpayers again.)

This disaster tries to prevent that and protect YOU, the taxpayers.

Comment by taxpayers
2016-01-14 09:59:45

over 300,k000 bankers have lost their jobs since 2008
the gov workers kept theirs

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 10:15:28

… And here you are, barfing up irrelevant talking points.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:22:24

Actually, a lot of state and local government workers lost their jobs.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-30_ooa6S8I4/VmG8NS1o29I/AAAAAAAAl5g/otX4xKX5GzA/s1600/StateLocalNov2015.PNG

 
 
 
 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:38:52

Still waiting on Sarbanes-Oxley to work. Throw out accounting rules, why not.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 09:25:55

Why bother passing laws if the executive branch can simply choose to not enforce them?

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2016-01-14 12:35:39

Your Republican Congress at work.

Oxide,

At least in this case, a law needs to be passed in order to soften Dodd Frank. In most cases, the lobbyists simply push the SEC rules in a direction to soften the intent of the law.

Instead of having an open debate and being specific on the regulations, the chickensh*t Democrats who wrote Dodd Frank put the law in general terms which then required hundreds of new rules to be written by the SEC, all of which are subject to comment from the public (ie. the lobbyists).

As such, we have massive amounts of new ineffective regulation. Awesome.

As Chris Dodd said himself: “What do they expect me to write, a 100,000-page bill? This is far beyond the capacity, the expertise, the knowledge of a Congress”

Exactly.

So instead of doing the hard work of putting their detailed intent in writing, they allowed the SEC…ahem, the lobbyists…to write the detail of the regulations.

Comment by taxpayers
2016-01-14 13:03:26

So small banks have to spend big for compliance

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 06:17:09

Humans could evolve webbed feet if sea levels rise, scientist claims

By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor

12:01AM GMT 13 Jan 2015

Comments223 Comments

The perils of climate change are well known, but rising sea levels could also alter human evolution, scientists have claimed.

Rising sea levels could force communities to live in underwater or semi-aquatic towns which could change out physiology.

Dr Matthew Skinner, a paleoanthropologist from the University of Kent, claims that humans could evolve to have webbed hands and feet and less body hair so they could move quickly through the water.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…d-evolve-webbed-feet-if-sea-levels-rise-scientist-claims.html -

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 06:21:25

Waterworld!

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 06:37:47

We’ll be following the Baltic Wet Index.

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-01-15 03:27:03

+6 Fathoms!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 06:23:08

and martians could land any day.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:39:57

Lolas already got webbed feet from one too many favela showers.

Comment by Bubbletbot
2016-01-14 21:25:25

I had to Google Favela. That was really funny.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 06:23:53

Sneak preview from the documentary of Dr Matthew Skinner’s research.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l1GvDWtccI - 169k -

 
Comment by Combotechie
2016-01-14 06:26:55

“Our eyes would even become more like cats, so we could see in the murky gloom of seas and rivers and our lungs would shrink as we became used to using artificial tanks to breathe underwater.

“’Regular underwater foraging would lead to the evolution of longer fingers and toes which would then likely develop ‘webbed’ interconnecting skin to enable easier swimming,” said Dr Skinner.

“’We may evolve a tapetum lucidum, an additional layer in the retina, like cat’s eyes, that would improve our vision in low light conditions such as underwater.

“Due to the cold environment of being submerged in water regularly, we would maintain a layer of ‘baby fat’ into adulthood as an insulator.”

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 08:34:34

So evolution wouldn’t stop. Seems reasonable.

 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 06:51:56

Warmists gonna warm.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 07:02:15

Now the theme is Global Wetting.

Wetters gonna wet.

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 07:22:24

Are you saying the Betters are wetter?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 07:25:57

I’m sorry, the Betters are wetters.

 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 07:56:47

Incontinence is the next frontier of civil rights.

Now that our betters have convinced us that you deserve a trophy for wearing women’s panties, wearing adult diapers deserves a double trophy.

Urinals = Patriarchy.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 10:43:00

Maybe it will become fashionable to wear bulky adult diapers even if you don’t need them

 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 11:51:07

Winter in the Atlantic.

Alex, first January hurricane since 1938, forms in Atlantic

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2016/01/14/hurricane-alex-azores/78785472/

Alex became the first hurricane to form in the Atlantic Ocean in January in nearly 80 years Thursday morning, the National Hurricane Center said.

A hurricane warning was in effect for the Azores as the storm headed north-northeast at 20 mph toward the island chain with winds of 85 mph. The storm is forecast to bring hurricane conditions to the central Azores by early Friday.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 11:56:38

We have a very rare January tropical storm in the Atlantic while having the earliest Central Pacific hurricane on record in the Pacific. “Warmers got Balance”

Pali becomes earliest hurricane on record in Central Pacific

http://www.staradvertiser.com/breaking-news/pali-could-reach-hurricane-strength-surf-rises-on-south-shore/

Pali intensified into a category 1 hurricane today with sustained winds of 85 mph, far southwest of Hawaii.

The storm is the earliest hurricane on record in the Central Pacific.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 10:25:16

could evolve to have webbed hands and feet and less body hair so they could move quickly through the water.

Cause those sea lions and seals, they definitely have less body hair.

LOLZ.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 11:05:05

The rhino, elephant, dolphin, and whale (and maybe man, according to the water ape theory) all lost body fur due to an aquatic phase (which some still are in), but other mostly aquatic mammals didn’t. I guess those that retained their fur are in colder regions where its benefits outweigh its problems.

 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 10:34:13

Screw webbed feet, I want a tail.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 10:44:00

I want to be Spiderman!

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 11:07:17

I like the dinosaur option: let’s go with flying.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 17:08:25

“Screw webbed feet, I want a tail.”

I was told you already had one.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 06:29:54

Another Brit celebrity bites the dust:

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/british-actor-alan-rickman-died/story?id=36283232

RIP, Alan Rickman. Class act.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 07:02:24

BTW, I’ve posted this before, a relative who has toiled in the tabloid industry for years once told me that it is fairly reliable lore in the industry that celebrity deaths tend to come in three’s, so when one major or semi major name expires, all the reporters are put on alert, sometimes even recalled from vacation or time off, in order to provide the coverage.

So, Bowie, Rickman, I guess we’ll have to wait and see if another one bites the dust.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 07:18:15

Hopefully someone who won’t be missed.

 
Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:47:48

What about Meadowlark Lemon?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 08:52:52

fairly reliable lore in the industry that celebrity deaths tend to come in three’s,

It pleases the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 09:29:35

You forgot Lemmy.

 
Comment by Ann Gogh
2016-01-14 09:46:20

wayne rodgers

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:13:20

Severus Snape dead and gone…a sad day at Hogworts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 07:19:26

You may not be full-blown gay, PB, but you’re definitely peering over the fence with that comment.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 07:48:53

Careful, he may hike up his hijab for you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-14 07:51:30

I am too old and have way too many kids to take any offense in your remark.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 10:20:04

Being labeled a cross dressing Muslim homosexual for daring to make a Harry Potter reference doesn’t send you into apoplexy?

You’re kicked out of the crybaby conservative club.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-14 06:31:03

Soros backed moveon.org endorses Bernie Sanders!

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-14 08:44:49

Looks like hedging his bets.

Comment by redmondjp
2016-01-14 11:04:54

I said this yesterday: Soros is backing both of them.

Then somebody said there is no proof of that.

So here is your proof.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:31:56

No, it’s probably the same story from yesterday about Soros’ support of Hillary Clinton. There’s still no proof that he’s also supporting Sen. Sanders.

 
 
 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 13:01:18

Soros touched you in a personal area!

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 06:45:24

Yet another flashing red warning light.

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231026

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 06:48:48

A foretaste of what we can expect when we have our own Soros-installed Frau Merkel, Hilary Clinton, implementing the next phase of the oligarchy’s “fundamental transformation.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/12097762/Angela-Merkel-faces-new-rebellion-over-refugees.html

Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 08:37:34

New York Times real journalists provide a narrative:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/world/europe/a-climate-of-fear-widens-divisions-in-europes-migrant-crisis.html

Every immigrant, migrant, refugee, dreamer, etc will grow up to be doctors and astronauts. Every single one of them, my betters tell me. Getting raped = checking your privilege.

Forward.

Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 08:54:00
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 12:49:38

He said it appears the two — who had been consuming alcohol and possibly using drugs — had consensual sex.

Sounds like her “bad boy” turned out to be badder than expected.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:34:05

Someone promised you that no one would die anymore?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 06:58:55

‘Yesterday, four members of Congress sent a joint letter to both Richard Cordray, head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, demanding an investigation into predatory practices at Warren Buffett’s mobile home unit Clayton Homes.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-14/slumlord-buffetts-disturbing-business-model-be-probed-feds

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 07:13:30

Obama’s favorite oligarch accused of being a slum lord? I am shocked, shocked! And I’m sure it is purely coincidental that “connected” TBTF financial firms got trillions in printing-press Bernanke Bux to buy up distressed housing from FBs so they could turn around and rent back to those same FBs.

If you like your crony capitalism, you can keep your crony capitalism…especially since Hillary will ramp it up into turbo mode.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:36:58

Buffett is a very mild traitor to his class. That enrages the wealthy and their supporters.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 07:16:39

What could possibly go wrong when we allow the neocons to run amok with their “regime change” nation-destroying agenda in the Middle East, then welcome in waves of embittered, radicalized refugees from those same devastated nations?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/12097587/Istanbul-suicide-bomber-registered-as-a-refugee-a-week-before-attack.html

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 09:35:35

Invade the world, invite the world.

It’s as American as Pizza and Burritos.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 07:17:43

Self-appointed ‘judge’ arrives in Burns to ask local residents to charge government officials with crimes

A self-proclaimed “U.S. Superior Court judge” who has been involved in past property rights protests in other states arrived Tuesday in Burns with plans to convene an extra-legal “citizens grand jury” that he said will review evidence that public officials may have committed crimes.

Bruce Doucette, a 54-year-old owner of a computer design and repair shop in suburban Denver, told The Oregonian/OregonLive, that he made the trip at the request of Harney County residents. He said he met with the armed occupiers of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge to hear their evidence, which he called “significant,” that government officials have committed crimes.

But he declined to say which officials or which crimes they discussed and said a privately appointed “grand jury” of Harney County residents, not he as a self-appointed judge, would decide whether to charge anyone with a crime.

“The grand jury will convene in private and make its decisions in private,” Doucette said. “The role of a superior court judge is not very glorified. All we do is write up” what the local citizens decide, he said.

Doucette’s entry into the fray and claim to special Constitutional powers is the latest in a 11-day drama that has drawn a series of attention-seeking, Constitution-citing characters who say they can help Harney County residents solve their problems with federal restrictions on use of public lands.

Ammon Bundy and other organizers of the occupation have said in blog posts and other statements that they believe that lawyers in the U.S. attorney’s office, federal court judges and leaders of the Bureau of Land Management, among others, have broken laws and violated the Constitution in their treatment of ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond.

The Hammonds, who have owned ranch land adjacent to the refuge since the 1960s, were denied access to federal rangelands, to water on federally owned land and have been jailed for five years each for setting fires they say were necessary to protect their property.

In Bundy’s view, setting those restrictions on use of federal resources and using the courts to punish the Hammonds for burning 139 acres of federal rangeland represented unconstitutional overreach by federal officials. And the failure of state and local officials, including Sheriff Dave Ward, are also guilty, for failing to protect their citizens from those federal actions.

Doucette would easily reach the same conclusion since the leader of the movement under which he was declared a judge insists that the BLM is a private corporation, not a government agency, and the federal government ceased operating under the Constitution in the 1860s.

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/01/self-appointed_judge_arrives_i.html#incart_big-photo

Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 07:27:16

Wetters gonna wet.

Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 07:48:26

Hillary Clinton is incontinent.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 09:11:37

Wetters gonna wet.
Hillary Clinton is incontinent.

You have to wonder about the connections between political beliefs and certain types of humor, and what they reveal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 07:30:37

meanwhile everyday cnbc is wheeling out some shrill to say the bull market is not over. These folks are really pathetic.

Comment by oxide
2016-01-14 12:59:11

I wonder how Larry Kudlow’s run for Senate is doing.

Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 13:53:37

cocaine kudlow at your service.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-14 07:41:41

Meanwhile, back on the southern border:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2016/01/14/judge-lawsuit-saying-central-american-migrants-are-held-in-filthy-inhumane-conditions-can-go-forward/

Sure, I’m guessing these illegals traveled in luxury until they got to the US. Deport the lawyers.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 07:56:11

I would expect the DNC to fund better temporary detention conditions for their future votes-for-benefits entitlement bloc.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 10:33:51

Was listening on the radio to some SJW whining about how Obama is the “Deporter in Chief” and has deported more people than Dubya did. Then on another news segment they were whining about non citizen veterans being deported after they committed a crime.

Everyone seems to think they have the right to live here (and join the FSA)

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 13:42:22

I’ve known some legal immigrants from both Latin America and Eastern Europe who seem to think that illegal immigration is essentially a victimless crime. It’s a little surprising to me that they wouldn’t resent the people who didn’t fill out the forms and subject themselves to fingerprinting and so forth.

Comment by Canklepants
2016-01-14 18:07:43

He’s no deportee in chief. He changed what was counted to include turnarounds, something not counted before.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 08:19:20

Huffington Post betters ask will America succumb to Trumpism:

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5695d449e4b09dbb4bad43fb

Remember, it’s not about the content of a narrative, it’s about controlling a narrative.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 09:31:59

What if no one (other than cry bully SJW’s) cares about the narrative and ignores it? Does HuffPo or the NYT still control it?

 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 08:24:22

Salon dot com leads with the following narrative:

http://www.salon.com/2016/01/14/thank_you_oregon_militiamen_the_longer_you_stay_the_more_ridiculous_you_and_the_conservative_movement_look/

Lena Dunham is running Hillary Clinton’s Instagram account. She also made false rape accusations and admitted in her autobiography to molesting her baby sister.

It’s the progressive way.

 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 08:30:25

New York Times real journalists provide a narrative:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/style/was-he-gay-bisexual-or-bowie-yes.html

Bowie’s legacy can’t just be about the music, the narrative must be scripted to justify the awarding of trophies.

Forward.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 09:14:37

Bowie’s the kind of guy you’d run out of town if you the darn government would get off your back and respect your freedom, right goon?

Comment by Goon
2016-01-14 12:03:00

Better, this is a ticket stub from a David Bowie concert I attended in 1990

http://i.imgur.com/D7xjucz.jpg

While you were listening to DJ Jazzy Jeff & Fresh Prince on your Sony Sports Walkmen, I had better music taste than people a decade older than me

You probably thought Kasey Kasem was cool when you were in high school, LOLZ

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 20:20:46

What do you think David would have thought of your regular attacks on trannies? That they were cool and edgy? Or the kind of crap he’d been hearing from the lamebrains for most of his career?

I bet he’d have thrown you out of his concert. And what were you doing there anyway, hypocrite? Guffawing at the weirdos?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-14 09:29:49

As far as young SJW’s are concerned, his music is from the “olds” generation and they don’t care about it. All that they care about is his sexuality.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 10:12:42

One thing about David Bowie - he had a great sense of fashion. Well dressed up to nearly the end. He posed for a picture in a suit and Fedora with a big smile just three days before his death.

Robert Palmer also was well into fashion.

Maybe that’s part of the key to being a well remembered star - to look very decent, healthy, clean even up to the last breath.

Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-14 11:49:26

It’s important to Californians.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 17:22:29

In flyoverland, one is judged by the ostentatiousness of one’s mobility scooter.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:16:35

Also by whether an American or Confederate flag flies outside your garage…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Donald Trump
2016-01-14 09:48:58

Show me someone without an ego, and I’ll show you a loser.

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 10:14:59

Real egoists are too good for having a leader. Real egoists have the stones to rule themselves.

No Trump, no Sanders, no Hillary, no Jeb, no Cruz, no rulers. Just rulz.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 10:32:52

Barney Sanders is pro-debt slavery.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:17:35

Trump is pro-torture.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 11:46:23

Just rulz.

And who enforces the rulz?

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-14 21:27:33

Common sense rules are what we have and they are enforced by your peers. For example, imagine that heroin and cocaine are legalized for recreational use. Would you or I take either now that they are legal? Most likely not. We don’t want to become addicted and end up overdosed. And if for some magical reason we would never overdose, we would not want our lives centered on drugs. Social rule is you work or you don’t eat. And if drugs prevent you from working you don’t eat. Society enforces the rule.

Cops are not around me. Anyone can come and try to invade my place and shoot me down. I live in a very safe community and it is not cops that make it safe. It is the community. We mostly work for a living and are rational enough to know we profit more by treating each other how wpwe want to be treated ourselves.

We will see a massive decentralization of power partly because of the blockchain technology, which uses consensus-based proofs of work. As for justice, the system of higher courts for appealing is the right direction. But there will be overlapping competing courts tied to insurance companies (and police and even defense companies). Just as insurance companies communicate when a car accident happens they will communicate and negotiate in a criminal matter. There have been well written books for decades regarding competing governments. It is not my wish to recite them all here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Puggs
2016-01-14 11:57:28

“I could care about you but then who’s looking out for me…?”

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 10:05:15

I’ve been meaning to announce this to my HBB friends; I hope you’ll forgive me for being somewhat tardy in this announcement, but I suspect you’ll understand my general lack of available time recently:

http://picpaste.com/IMG_20160102_110832-DFThrvmr.jpg

:-)

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 10:53:20

A cute Primeling! Congratulations.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 11:33:40

Thanks, Blue! :-)

 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 11:11:03

Congrats! His/her costs will be contained.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 12:31:11

Thanks! Not sure how _well_ contained they will be—though I can take solace that they are at least finite! :-)

 
 
Comment by Tarara Boomdea
2016-01-14 12:09:46

Adorable. He or she?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-01-14 12:32:21

Thanks! :-) I find her to be so as well, but I know I’m biologically programmed to think so no matter what, so it’s nice to hear that others find her so. Little girl, btw… :-)

Comment by inchbyinch
2016-01-14 16:11:14

Prime
Congrats on the baby. She is adorable.
What is her name, dob, and her stats? Your engine, car or caboose? Are you two using Q-Tips to keep your eyes open? lol

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-14 15:01:55

Nothing short of BEAAAUUUUTIFULLLL!!!!

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 17:03:28

That’s a keeper

Congrats

 
Comment by Muggy
2016-01-14 18:21:03

Congrats!

 
Comment by jane
2016-01-14 19:23:39

OMG how cute! Congratulations!

 
Comment by ahansen
2016-01-15 00:58:16

Awww. Many congrats, Primey! Hope you and baby Primette have the best times evah!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:18:35

A beaut!

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 10:07:19

“Cheap Oil Hits Housing In North Dakota, Texas, & Others”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-14/cheap-oil-hits-housing-north-dakota-texas-others

And housing is gonna get a whole lot cheaper in the coming years and decades my friends.

Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 15:34:28

when hookers are struggling you know the economy sucks.

Comment by rms
2016-01-14 23:46:56

Fortunately the raw materials have a long shelf life, so it’s just a matter of incentivizing the service.

 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 12:43:39

Goldman’s puppet Cruz is is big trouble. Trump will ride him on this and being a Canadian tonight. Trump is ripping the GOP apart, gotta love it! Better than watching The Apprentice.

Cruz missed the vote to audit the fed too. Bye, bye Cruz….

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 17:25:18

I’d rather see Trump ride Cruz on being a Goldman Sachs puppet (following in the Obama tradition - Goldman was his #2 campaign contributed) and being AWOL in the fight to rein in the Fed.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:22:34

Dan’s man Ted…

Politics
Ted Cruz Didn’t Report Goldman Sachs Loan in a Senate Race
By MIKE McINTIRE
JAN. 13, 2016
Ted and Heidi Cruz, after he won the runoff for the Republican nomination for a Senate seat from Texas in July 2012. Credit Johnny Hanson/Houston Chronicle, via Associated Press

As Ted Cruz tells it, the story of how he financed his upstart campaign for the United States Senate four years ago is an endearing example of loyalty and shared sacrifice between a married couple.

“Sweetheart, I’d like us to liquidate our entire net worth, liquid net worth, and put it into the campaign,” he says he told his wife, Heidi, who readily agreed.

But the couple’s decision to pump more than $1 million into Mr. Cruz’s successful Tea Party-darling Senate bid in Texas was made easier by a large loan from Goldman Sachs, where Mrs. Cruz works. That loan was not disclosed in campaign finance reports.

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 13:05:27

Housing and bubbles:

A Tale of Two Bubbles (Or the Brazilian Title:) É Diferente Aquia.

Here’s a chart of Rio house prices going back to 2008. Brazil’s been in a major recession going back about a year and worsening but look at the slow roll over in house prices. There is no “crash.” (So far?)

http://www.zap.com.br/imoveis/fipe-zap-b/?_ga=1.268038286.1033231274.1451500501

Compare it to the USA chart below which showed a massive decline (crash) beginning even before USA’s recession in about 09. Why the difference? IMO because the USA bubble was facilitated by massive mortgage debt while Brazil’s was not. (To USA’s extent) Also, Brazil has very low turnover and much less the flipper’s get rich quick mentality. And Brazil has a chronic shortage of housing. Much more than even California imo. I predicted years ago that any downturn in Brazil housing would not be a crash but a slower downturn. So far I’ve been correct. But in a major Depression, all bets are off. :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case%E2%80%93Shiller_index#/media/File:Case-Shiller_data_from_1890_to_2012.png

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 13:36:25

We’re not in Brazil Lola. And neither are you.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 20:54:46

The Brazil Peso is worthless.

 
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-01-14 14:38:36

Boca Raton, FL Housing Market Craters; Prices Plummet 8% YoY On Surging Defaults

http://www.zillow.com/boca-raton-fl-33076/home-values/

 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-14 15:00:02

Barry says: “It’s all good - no need to worry….”

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/01/14/barrys-real-legacy/

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-14 15:06:30

Cruz, according to the Times, took loans totaling about $1 million from two Wall Street banks: Goldman Sachs (GS) and Citibank (C). The Goldman loan is a particular eyebrow-raiser because Cruz’s wife, Heidi Cruz, is a Goldman executive (who’s on leave while Cruz campaigns).

release the skeletons from the closets! ooops!

on one hand he bashes Wall St….then…… he hides this loan….

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 15:45:20

The man has Wall Street AND Jesus on his side! Trump is toast.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 16:00:40

The man has Wall Street AND Jesus on his side!

Because VanillaISIS “owns” Christianity. Scary huh?

“Our side, the conservative side, needs to reeducate its people that we own the entire (Christian) tradition,”

GOP Lawmaker Says Conservatives ‘Own’ Christian Tradition

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dave-brat-conservatives-own-the-bible_5697536fe4b0ce4964234b53

A Republican lawmaker in Virginia suggested President Barack Obama and other Democrats shouldn’t cite the Bible because conservatives “own the entire tradition.”

Dave Brat, the Tea Party Republican who beat former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a primary race and then went on to win a seat in Congress, was agitated that Obama said last year that Republicans opposed to allowing refugees into the country were “scared of widows and orphans.”

…He said it’s time for conservatives to take back the Bible.

“Our side, the conservative side, needs to reeducate its people that we own the entire tradition,” he said.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-14 20:28:54

we own the entire tradition,” he said.

They own the witch hunts and Crusades, at least.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2016-01-14 20:44:27

Yep put these clowns in charge and maybe we can resemble the shia sunni fighting for a few 1000 years.

Theocracy leads to vote for me God’s on my side and that other christian running works for the devil.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:23:34

Jesus and Wall Street don’t mix well…

 
 
 
Comment by Donald Trump
2016-01-14 15:40:10

I’m worth far too much money. I don’t need anybody’s money.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:27:26

Sean Bean: British people can’t believe ‘buffoon’ Donald Trump could be President
The Sheffield native weighed in on what Brits get wrong about Americans and vice versa
Olivia Blair
20 hours ago
Bean has a career spanning 20 years Joshua Blanchard/Getty Images

Sean Bean has explained how many British people feel about Donald Trump to Americans.

When appearing on Larry King Now, the actor and host discussed Trump who is still currently leading the GOP candidate polls.

After being asked by King what British people get wrong about Americans, Bean said one major misconception centres around the real estate mogul.

I don’t think British people can believe that this buffoon is a prospective American president,” he said.

He then went on to explain the petition which garnered over half a million signatures suggesting to ban Trump from the UK following his call to ban all Muslim immigration to the US.

 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 15:44:04

Watch Tara and the Trumplings sing of their love for Dear Leader:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPRfP_TEQ-g&app=desktop

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 16:41:28

Watch Tara and the Trumplings sing of their love for Dear Leader:

Good lord, 9 year old War Cheerleaders. It figures.

Expect Tonight’s Debate to Be All “Bomb the Hell Out of Them,” All the Time

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/01/14/without_rand_paul_expect_tonight_s_debate_to_be_all_bomb_the_hell_out_of.html

Fox Business Networks’ decision to drop Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul from the main stage at Thursday night’s Republican debate, as well as Paul’s decision not to participate in the undercard event, has eliminated the sole dissenting voice from what could be called the “bomb the shit of them” consensus in the Republican field.

The libertarian senator’s isolationist (though he rejects the term) foreign-policy views stand out from the rest of the field…..

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 17:16:24

Reality is starting to feel like the sequel to Idiocracy.

Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-14 18:00:39
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 18:08:39

I only looked at about half of that, but I didn’t see any problem. Was it the part about pursuing stem cell research that bothered you, or the part about planting trees?

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-14 18:33:07

You can not be this stupid, can you?

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-14 18:37:56

To be servant to our president…..

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 18:47:59

You’re calling me stupid because I can’t figure out the wacky thoughts running around in your head. That’s a good one.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 17:16:25

Hillary Clinton has webbed feet and Barney Sanders can breathe underwater through his gills.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 17:18:30

Trump bites his fart bubbles in the bathtub.

Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-14 17:21:40

Speaking from experience?

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-14 18:07:04

Have you stopped biting your fart bubbles in the bathtub?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 18:13:22

Ragin’ Russ Scrotalizer

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 17:19:48

“Hillary’s Lead Disintegrates: She Is Now Doing Worse Than In 2008, As Trump Surges”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-14/hillarys-lead-disintegrates-she-now-doing-worse-2008-trump-surges

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 17:28:13

Yes, but Hillary has a secret weapon. 47% of ‘Muricans are receiving some sort of gub’mint benefits, and 95% of the electorate are stupid. That pretty much clinches it for Her Essence of Snake Oil.

Comment by Obama Goons
2016-01-14 17:42:03

Hillaryous is unelectable.

 
 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-14 17:29:54

Hillary is in race to make Trump look good.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 17:39:12

Obama didn’t think she should be President.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 18:11:34

He gave her a pretty big job. If he trusted her that match, that’s quite an endorsement.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 18:31:47

Maybe. Maybe a concession. Maybe he was hoping she would get shot flying into combat zones in helicopters. She said she was under fire, didn’t she?

I just thought it was ironic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-14 18:59:36

I don’t think that any Secretaries of State have died flying into combat zones. It’s highly unlikely that the president was hoping for that. It’s also unlikely that his appointment was ironic, whatever that might mean. It’s the most senior position in the cabinet.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 19:10:25

Maybe he was hoping she would get shot flying into combat zones in helicopters.

Say what??

That and the debate tonight’s like “Dumb and Dumber”.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 20:39:32

“….any Secretaries of State have died flying into combat zones.

Didn’t she say she was under hostile fire though?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 21:03:35

Didn’t she say she was under hostile fire though?

So that would lead you to actually believe Obama would give Hillary the Sec of State position because “maybe Obama was hoping Hillary would get shot flying into combat zones in helicopters.” ??

I don’t find your supposition ironic. I find it outlandish.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 23:28:03

to actually believe Obama would give Hillary …

Oops. Hillary lied. Forget the whole irony thing.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:29:01

Proving again that American voters are morons…

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 17:38:58

Obama’s puppetmasters paying yet another fine related to their bundling toxic-waste MBSs and selling it as AAA rated “investments” to gullible investors. Of course, there are no admissions of criminal wrongdoing, and no one at GS will ever face criminal penalties.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/01/14/investing/goldman-sachs-settles-mortgage-probe/index.html

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 17:48:25

Why would Web foot put herself or the country in a position like this?

Foreign donations to foundation raise major ethical questions for Hillary Clinton

By Jennifer Rubin February 18, 2015

In an extraordinary report that has not yet been fully digested, the Wall Street Journal tells us that the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation has received millions from foreign governments including Qatar, a prominent backer of Hamas:

The Clinton Foundation has dropped its self-imposed ban on collecting funds from foreign governments and is winning contributions at an accelerating rate, raising ethical questions as Hillary Clinton ramps up her expected bid for the presidency.

Recent donors include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline. . . .

United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, gave between $1 million and $5 million in 2014, and the German government—which also hadn’t previously given—contributed between $100,000 and $250,000.

A previous donor, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation was created in 1999. Part of that came in 2014, although the database doesn’t specify how much.

The Australian government has given between $5 million and $10 million, at least part of which came in 2014. It also gave in 2013, when its donations fell in the same range.

Qatar’s government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup gave between $250,000 and $500,000 in 2014. Qatar’s government had previously donated between $1 million and $5 million.

Oman, which had made a donation previously, gave an undisclosed amount in 2014. Over time, Oman has given the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Prior to last year, its donations fell in the same range.

The foundation of course provides luxury travel for Hillary Clinton and her spouse, a high-visibility platform and access to mega-donors. She is beholden in a meaningful sense to its donors. No presidential candidate can justify a conflict of interest of this magnitude; it is not merely the appearance of conflict but actual conflict of interest.

If former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell (R) might go to jail for receiving lavish gifts for a donor for whom he made a few phone calls, what would be the remedy if, once in office, Hillary Clinton extended her office not only to make calls but also to approve policy and financial arrangements worth billions back to these countries? How will the American people ever be satisfied we are getting her undivided loyalty? No matter how much she protests, her judgment would be questioned as influenced by gratitude toward the foundation’s wealthy patrons. And, of course, a president cannot recuse himself or herself from dealings, so there is no practical way to avoid the conflict.

It is bad enough when Clinton takes gobs of money in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, oil and chemical companies, and other titans of industry — although that, too, raises the potential for conflicts of interest. But a foreign government should never have any claim on the loyalty of a U.S. president, which is why foreign donations directly to a campaign are illegal. We cannot give her a pass simply because her entity is a “foundation,” not a PAC or campaign entity.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/…/ -

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-14 21:26:25

This is straight-up influence peddling, something our resident HBB progressives, who are blind in the left eye, refuse to acknowledge.

 
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-01-14 18:02:25

San Clemente, CA Housing Market Stumbles; Prices Crater 9% YoY

http://www.zillow.com/san-clemente-ca/home-values/

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-14 18:11:36

Oh what a tangled web we weave

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL 23, 2015

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.

Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

http://www.nytimes.com/…oundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html -

 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-14 18:30:52

are we in a new bull market now?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 18:51:29

If Trump wins the nomination this why I will think he’ll get killed in any one-on-one debate in the general election. Watch tonight. Trump’s one of seven which means there’s very little time for any in depth policy stuff - just a lot of broad general strokes. But even then, Trump will be the least able out of all seven to articulate any type of coherent policy specifics. Trumps mostly all insults and empty platitudes and slogans spouted in an arrogant 4 grade level. Oh yea and “I’m leading the polls” stuff.

Now this might be OK in a 7 man Repub mud-fest with a Repub audience, however it won’t cut it in a 1 on 1 in a general election debate with undecideds. Because there, tougher policy questions and intense follow ups will put Trump in a place where he’s unable to excel. After about an hour, he goes glassy eyed and looks tired and bored.

So let’s see.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-14 19:08:28

Mafia Blocks, Ben Jones, Phony Scandals And Donald Trump live in your empty skull, rent free.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-14 20:45:05

One wonders why such a worthless poser comes crawling back over and over. It’s a dingleberry for sure.

Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2016-01-14 20:54:32

I guess it’s because you’re bored as well as blue. Is it snowing?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-15 04:13:21

your.empty.skull.rent.free.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-01-14 19:31:47

Keller, TX Housing Market Collapses; Prices Crater 24% YoY As Sellers Slash Prices

http://www.movoto.com/keller-tx/market-trends/

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 00:59:13

Is $20 the new $40?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:05:20

The oil market
$20 is the new $40
Why the oil price has plunged
Jan 16th 2016 | From the print edition
Timekeeper

SINCE the new year, the price of oil has surprised even the most bearish punters, plunging by 18%. On January 12th West Texas Intermediate (WTI), America’s benchmark, briefly dipped below $30 a barrel, its lowest level since 2003. The next day an incipient rally was undone by the news that American stocks of crude oil and petroleum products had reached 1.3 billion barrels, a new record. Firms are hunkering down. BP this week announced hefty job cuts; Petrobras, Brazil’s state-controlled oil firm, slashed planned investment.

Some blame factors other than supply and demand for turning increasingly bearish. For instance, Standard Chartered, a bank, said oil might need to fall as low as $10 a barrel before speculators concede that “matters had gone too far”. But it’s mostly guesswork. Such is the level of uncertainty that American derivatives contracts tied to deliveries in April imply an oil price of anything from $25 to $56 a barrel, according to official number-crunchers.

Neil Atkinson of the International Energy Agency (IEA), a forecasting outfit, finds lots in the physical oil market to be bearish about—particularly regarding consumption, which was one of the few factors supporting prices last year. The sell-off in oil in the past fortnight has occurred concurrently with a slide in the Chinese stockmarket and the yuan, which some investors think reflects weakness in China’s economy and hence in demand for oil. Though Mr Atkinson acknowledges that possibility, he thinks this risk is overplayed: figures on January 13th showed China imported a record 6.7m barrels a day (b/d) of oil in 2015.

The trouble, though, is that apart from India and a wobbly China, demand is not looking promising anywhere this year. Europe is unlikely to see a repeat of its relatively strong oil-demand growth in 2015. Although America’s economy continues to grow, tightening fuel-efficiency standards cap the upside. Drivers in the Middle East, where fuel use rose last year, are more likely to keep their cars off the road after their governments raised petrol prices or eliminated fuel subsidies altogether to shore up public finances. “There are now considerable uncertainties about oil-demand growth globally,” Mr Atkinson says.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-15 01:08:09

Though most don’t yet know it, and many others will deny it, global asset markets have begun to crater.

First up: Commodities, shipping and share prices.

Next up: Global housing crater…

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post