January 22, 2016

Bits Bucket for January 22, 2016

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here. Please visit my Youtube channel which you can also find here:

http:tinyurl.com/http-hbb-com




RSS feed

238 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 02:48:30

Is euro stimulus on the way?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 02:54:28

‘The EU Is on the Verge of Collapse’—An Interview
George Soros and Gregor Peter Schmitz
February 11, 2016 Issue
The following is a revised version of an interview between George Soros and Gregor Peter Schmitz of the German magazine WirtschaftsWoche.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 20:31:23

That’s what evil Lord Soros WANTS us to think.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 02:59:46

4 key takeaways from Draghi’s ‘no limits’ statement
By William Watts
Published: Jan 21, 2016 1:02 p.m. ET
‘No limits’ to action within ECB’s mandate
AFP/Getty Images
He doesn’t want to disappoint again.

After leaving investors disappointed in December by announcing a smaller-than-expected expansion of the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing program, Mario Draghi zagged Thursday.

The silver-tongued central banker delivered a more-forceful-than-expected indication that additional action could be in store when policy makers meet in March.

Emphasizing that the ECB has “no limits” to using tools and instruments to achieve its mandate of steady inflation of near but just below 2%, Draghi said falling oil prices and a slowdown in emerging markets warrant a review and possible recalibration of the ECB’s policy measures in about two months. The remarks sent the euro tumbling and boosted European stocks and U.S. stock-index futures—at least temporarily.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 03:06:15

Top News
Thu Jan 21, 2016 | 6:10 PM EST
Badly bruised Wall Street finds solace in oil rebound
Thu, Jan 21 2016 | 01:18
Oil rebound, stimulus hopes boost stocks
By Noel Randewich

(Reuters) - Wall Street staged a modest rally on Thursday as oil prices recorded their biggest gain this year and ECB President Mario Draghi raised hopes of more stimulus for Europe.

Seven of 10 major S&P 500 sectors climbed, with a 2.88-percent jump in energy stocks .SPNY leading the way.

Helping global and U.S. stocks, the European Central Bank kept its main rates on hold and Draghi said the central bank would “review and possibly reconsider” its monetary policy as soon as March. Many analysts had not expected a rate cut before June.

Also boosting share prices, oil spiked from a 12-year low after U.S. crude stockpiles did not rise as much as feared.

In the prior session, the relentless drop in oil prices and fears of a China-led global economic slowdown had sent the S&P 500 to its lowest since 2014. The index remains at lows not seen since September last year.

A lack of upbeat technical measures made some investors doubt that Thursday’s gains would hold, and many remained cautious the market could fall further.

“It’s a different situation than in previous years when you could buy the dip and be very confident,” said Bruce Bittles, chief investment strategist at Robert W. Baird & Co in Nashville. “Here you have a trend that has turned negative and a Fed that is far less friendly than in 2012, ‘13 or ‘14.”

Billionaire investor George Soros told Bloomberg TV he shorted the S&P 500.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 03:11:02

Draghi to the Street: “Get shorty!”

Comment by azdude
2016-01-22 05:13:38

artificially priced assets are essential for a thriving economy.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by azdude
2016-01-22 05:56:11

lmao every week there is stimulus hopes.

what happened to work?

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 06:14:15

Every day I’m eating more and more hotdogs

http://youtu.be/2DdkP6U4WjY

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2016-01-22 06:46:25

LOL. I just can’t watch that chit… makes me sick.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 06:47:29

Careful. Lola’s gonna get all spun up over that.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 11:52:42

Looks like Mafia already had a reaction.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 16:23:57

Lola… Remember…. Nothing accelerates the economy and raises the standard of living like falling prices to dramatically lower and more affordable levels. Nothing.

 
Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 19:26:02

Lola’s been unusually absent. Did he join the team reviewing Cankle emails or just another bender.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 19:43:23

Lola’s working on copping three hots and a cot while the snowstorm bears down on the streets and alleys of DC.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 06:49:21

lmao every week there is stimulus hopes.

what happened to work?

automation?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:18:57

Hope and chains going full retard. Thanks, Obama!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 22:55:54

Does it seem to others that Draghi’s stimulus whispers could backfire by stimulating more oil production that adds to the glut and deflationary pressures?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 22:59:38

Moody’s may downgrade 120 oil and gas companies, 55 mining companies
Published: Jan 22, 2016 11:37 a.m. ET
Schlumberger, Gazprom and Alcoa may see their credit ratings cut
Getty Images
An oil glut has pushed prices to 12-year lows
By Ciara Linnane
Corporate news editor

More bad news for companies that are heavily exposed to the slumping commodities markets.

Moody’s Investors Service said it may downgrade the ratings of 120 oil and gas companies and 55 mining companies around the world, as the prices of a range of commodities remain at multiyear lows.

The credit rating agency said the mix of low prices, oversupply and weak demand “will continue to significantly stress the credit profiles of companies” in those sectors.

Increased production vastly exceeds growth in oil consumption, even with consumption growth by major consumers such as the U.S., China and India,” Moody’s wrote in a note. “Production now exceeds demand by about 2 million barrels per day, adding to already high global oil stocks.”

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 03:16:30

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” — George Orwell

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 06:04:55

Which is why Orwell portrayed a communist/socialist regime without capitalism. George Orwell would vote for Trump, anti-PC is anti-newspeak.

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-22 07:13:29

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they want to hear and what I want them to hear.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 04:29:15

Are the sheeple finally waking up and refusing to be herded into the Oligopoly’s incorporated neoliberal plantation?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-21/our-europe-dying-german-youth-blast-merkels-multicultural-utopia

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 06:55:38

The Identitaire movement began in France and it looks like it has spread to Germany. That video is very powerful.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:03:26

Merkel was the conservative candidate that the old people voted in. Not surprising the youth are the angry ones.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:18:51

Merkel is a tool of the banksters and globalists. A “conservative” she is not. To be a true conservative is to be diametrically opposed to selling out your countrymen.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 16:07:48

… And jump tall buildings in a single bound. I didn’t realize you were relegious.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 05:43:53

Time to buy Canadian oil trusts, yet?

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 06:44:45

What comes after the biggest expansion of credit in global history? What comes after the dead dragon bounce? The next big expansion or a trip to the dry cleaners?

Comment by rms
2016-01-22 06:50:51

“…the dead dragon bounce?”

+1 Indeed.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:04:47

Donald is gonna build a new bubble, and it’s gonna be huuuuuuge!

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 10:37:16

I guess you will be voting for him then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 05:46:53

Did you caucus for Trump, yet?

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 06:10:37

Latest CNN poll has Trump up 11 in IOWA

and

Barney up by 8 over Cankles.

Iowa is bs, though.

http://youtu.be/IgoB2JMEowc

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:40:34

It appears if you get the evangelicals, you will win IA republican caucus.

 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-22 09:12:54

Iowa does not mean much but Trump and Sanders also have healthy leads in New Hampshire as well.

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 19:43:47

I no longer want to hear anyone say Barney Saunders is any different:

“He has begun to talk about – and become more hawkish on – foreign policy. Initially, after the Paris and San Bernardino attacks, Bernie tried to avoid talking about ISIS. That’s not why he is running, after all. He memorably blew off questions about the issue during a visit to Baltimore, raising questions about his seriousness. Now he pledges to destroy the Islamic State, and this week he is running an ad in Iowa called “Defend this Nation.””

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/01/22/the-daily-202-bernie-sanders-has-a-eugene-v-debs-problem/?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_daily202

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 06:19:58

No, but Bernie Sanders has the best. political ad. ever. Jeebus, I don’t know who came up with it, I have to admit, this ad hits it out of the park. Sanders wasn’t kidding when he said he said he was looking for the Trump voters. This will definitely siphon some of them off.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/266605-sanderss-magnificent-america-campaign-ad

OTOH, seeing how Sanders invokes his Vermont roots in the ad and having seen the Sixty Minutes segment a while back on heroin in Vermont, the cynical side of me wants to say “where’s the teenager shooting up behind the barn and nodding off?”

Still, that is one heckuva ad.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 06:41:36

It’s nice and positive, smiles, hugs and feel good about being an ordinary American. It is 100% emotion invoking images, with no reasons given why we should vote for Bernie. Not sure how that is the best political ad ever.

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 06:50:38

A bunch of white hippies clapping to a 1960s song so they can vote for a socialist?

Apparently America was meant to be a Socialist Nightmare. Who knew?

“They’ve all come to look for America”

Like the San Bernardino couple or the Tsarnaev brothers?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 08:22:29

I saw Paul Simon on tour with Brian Wilson at the Greek Theatre in Los Angeles in 2001. Paul McCartney was in the audience and he came up on stage and played “I’ve Just Seen A Face” from Rubber Soul.

People with mortgages don’t get to see shows like that.

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:27:09

People with mortgages don’t get to see shows like that.

People with mortgage took your money with that crappy $hit show.

 
Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 09:03:07

People with mortgages will never occupy the same space with one of the two living Beatles (not that Ringo Starr actually counts).

The only songs that people with mortgages know are the songs that slaves sing while picking cotton on Ole Massa’s plantation.

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 09:27:04

songs that slaves sing

Those are probably some of the best songs out there.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:59:37

Those are probably some of the best songs out there.

Better than that “alternative” cr@p those fedora wearing hipsters play.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 06:54:15

Jeebus, Blue, yer disappointing me here. You’ve sort of answered your own question in your response.

Actually, the ad is a masterpiece of what, on Madison Ave, they call “positioning”. And it appeals, as you’ve said, to emotion and leaves the viewer to draw their own conclusion. Which, as we know, may be way off base. But I know that ad works, because it got to a cynic like me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 07:14:22

If it had shown some old guys taking over a bird sanctuary, Blue would have gotten misty-eyed.

“They’ve all gone,
to steal some free grazing land…”

 
Comment by Combotechie
2016-01-22 07:22:39

“And it appeals, as you’ve said, to emotion and leaves the viewer to draw their own conclusion.”

“They may forget what you said — but they will never forget how you made them feel.” —Carl W. Buehner

 
Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 07:23:31

We should all cheer for Barney Saunders. Putting the final nail in the coffin is god’s work. He also has zero chance in the general, so it’s a twofer. Go Barney!

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 07:51:23

Blue would have gotten misty-eyed.

Are you still sad that I didn’t take your bait on that one?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 08:11:01

Yes.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 08:16:25

Sorry, I was busy battling house depreciation.

 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-22 08:29:43

Awfully lily-white for a Lib commercial. Maybe the lyrics should have been “Their great-grandparents had all come to look for America a hundred years ago” ? Seriously, add a couple good old boys in Camo and it may as well have been a rally for Sister Sarah.

Bernie should have filmed this commercial at a more diverse rally, even if that meant waiting for… I guess South Carolina.

[and IIUC, Paul Simon was writing about a search for the metaphorical American spirit type thing -- which is what people were doing in the 1960's. If you want to sledgehammer on immigration, your go-to-musician is Neil Diamond.]

Palmetto, if you want to see the little starbursts and feel the thrill up your leg again, just plug in the Running-to-Jenny segment of Forrest Gump.

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:58:19

Awfully lily-white

So are the Bernie and Hillary supporters if you closely look at the audience in the rallies.

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 09:06:48

What’s wrong with white?

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 10:12:07

What’s wrong with white?

Too white, too corrupt, too angry, too fat, too old, too ugly, etc.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 11:33:44

Well, in your case maybe, but this white boy is young, fit, and highly amused. If you got off the couch you might be less crabby.

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 11:54:39

What’s wrong with white?

They don’t give Oscars to black people.

 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-22 12:45:53

What’s wrong with white? There are not enough of them on the Democratic side. Obama needed the minority vote, as will Hillary and Bernie. You don’t attract the minority vote with whites. Sorry that’s the way it is.

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 13:09:12

There are not enough of them on the Democratic side.

Just import more brownies.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 20:34:29

If all us honkeys would just vote democrat, there would be no need to import brownies…. And an orangotan wouldn’t be the republican candidate for president.

 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:07:07

The electorate is generally incapable of rational thought. Anything but an appeal to emotion goes in one ear and out the other.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:22:38

+1. It’s a feel-good ad utterly devoid of substance. Corrupt, vile people in this country - increasingly the majority - will still vote for their corrupt, vile candidate of choice: Hillary Clinton.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 20:36:02

It’s not their choice any more than trump is our choice. It’s the lesser of two evils, same as with us.

 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 07:37:35

best. political ad. ever.

Looks like Paul Simon is backing Bernie.

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:47:45

How many fools will vote for Bernie because he’s Paul Simon approved?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 07:56:17

That’s why I and others caution that Trump should not underestimate Bernie Sanders.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 08:39:50

America is almost ready for the rag-tag party of misfits, a coalition with nothing in common other than rejection of the PTB. Almost, not quite.

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 10:14:31

Almost, not quite.

That’s why Trump will fall short IMO.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:56:38

We’ll probably end up with it being Cruz vs. Hillary

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 11:35:11

The worst possible outcome.

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 13:15:47

Cruz vs. Hillary

Karma is a b!tch, America!

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:24:17

Unfortunately, the fact that 47% of the sheep are receiving taxpayer-funded benefits and 95% are stupid will ultimately dictate the outcome: President Hillary Clinton.

 
 
 
Comment by Fang nu
2016-01-22 08:07:17

Bernie is almost doddering.
I saw a video clip of him on some slight stairs.
Ten treads at the most, had there been two more he would have went to his knees.

A couple of well doctored pictures of a gray skinned and parkinsons nodding bernie…. And he’s out. He must look like the father of all ghosts in the morning. He looks like he farts dust.

I see one year as president and he’s dead… Of just dead. No mystery, just dead.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 08:23:13

Which means whoever he picks for Veep should be looked at closely.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 08:40:47

Elizabeth Warren?

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:51:24

Elizabeth Warren?

Dumb and Dumber is not a winning strategy.

 
Comment by oxide
2016-01-22 09:02:24

Sanders needs to make it to the nom before thinking of a Veep. And aren’t there rumors of Clinton’s health too? Although there isn’t much good evidence of that.

Fun story: After his stint with the Rough Riders in Cuba, Teddy Roosevelt was elected as governor of New York. Within two years, he had rooted out enough corruption to anger and frighten the corrupt political bosses. Their solution was to “promote” him to a high position that he couldn’t refuse, but had no real power.

They extracted him from Albany and sent him to stew in Washington with no other duty than to break ties in the Senate. Under McKinley. Oops.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:55:18

Bernie is almost doddering.
I saw a video clip of him on some slight stairs.
Ten treads at the most, had there been two more he would have went to his knees.

FWIW, FDR was wheelchair bound.

That said, Sanders is 74. If through some miracle he’s elected, I could only see him serving one term.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 10:59:17

That’s a good point. Climbing stairs isn’t in the job description.

 
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 13:06:55

But maintaining full faculty upstairs should be.

 
Comment by rms
2016-01-23 01:49:46

“FWIW, FDR was wheelchair bound.”

Yep, strap him to an easel for the state of the union. Hehe.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:18:22

Woody Guthrie, ‘Old Man Trump’ and a real estate empire’s racist foundations
The American music hero spent two years with Donald Trump’s father Fred as his landlord – and it inspired some of his most bitter writings
Composite of Donald Trump’s father Fred, and Woody Guthrie
Donald Trump’s father Fred, and Woody Guthrie.
Photograph: Corbis & Rex Features
Will Kaufman for The Conversation
Friday 22 January 2016 11.09 EST
Last modified on Friday 22 January 2016 11.45 EST

In December 1950, Woody Guthrie signed his name to the lease of a new apartment in Brooklyn. Even now, over half a century later, that uninspiring document prompts a double-take.

Below all the legal jargon is the signature of the man who had composed This Land is Your Land, the most resounding appeal to an equal share for all in America. Below that is the signature of Donald Trump’s father, Fred. No pairing could appear more unlikely.

Guthrie’s two-year tenancy in one of Fred Trump’s buildings and his relationship with the real estate mogul of New York’s outer boroughs produced some of Guthrie’s most bitter writings, which I discovered on a recent trip to the Woody Guthrie Archives in Tulsa. These writings have never before been published; they should be, for they clearly pit America’s national balladeer against the racist foundations of the Trump real estate empire.

Recalling these foundations becomes all the more relevant in the wake of the racially charged proclamations of Donald Trump, who last year announced: “My legacy has its roots in my father’s legacy.”

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 05:56:00

Lower housing costs?

Lower property taxes?

No - another government ponzi scheme.

——————

There’s Some Hope for First-Time Home Buyers
Bloomberg - Prashant Gopal, Heather Perlberg - 1/22/2016

First-time homebuyers are finally jumping into the U.S. property market.

Need proof? Look at the mortgage market’s fastest-growing segment: loans with low down payments insured by the Federal Housing Administration.

Originations of FHA-backed mortgages, used predominately by first-time buyers, were up 54 percent in September from a year earlier, according to the most recent data from CoreLogic Inc. By December, the FHA insured 22 percent of all loan originations, up from 17 percent a year earlier, according to data compiled by Ellie Mae Inc.

President Barack Obama’s administration, in January 2015, reduced mortgage-insurance premiums for FHA loans. That lowered the cost of getting a home loan and brought in at least 75,000 new borrowers with credit scores of less than 680, according to a November report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The FHA estimates that borrowers save $900 a year on average as a result of the lower premium. The move made FHA-backed mortgages more competitive with other loans that have low-down-payment options, said Guy Cecala, publisher of the newsletter Inside Mortgage Finance. While mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have an option for borrowers to put down as little as 3 percent, they require private insurance with risk-adjusted premiums based on credit scores, debt-to-income ratios and other factors.

 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 06:03:33

1. Now you know why obama wants to import as many muslims as possible. They will vote and support democrats for generations.

2. The destruction of the middle class, begun under obama, will be complete if Hillary wins. We will turn into a 3rd world cesspool. With a thin crust of uber wealthy and the masses of poor. Seperated by high wall with broken glass.

3. In the future, the best job for anyone to aspire to is to work for the government.

————————

Only Six People Greet Hillary at Texas Airport, She Ignores Them
Truth Revolt | 21 Jan 16 | Tiffany Gabbay

Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton is not the warm and fuzzy type. In fact, she often treats her supporters with what can only be described as thinly veiled contempt. You would think the former Secretary of State would show more appreciation to her followers, particularly in Texas, where her fan-base is small.

KFDM reports that during a fundraising stop in Beaumont, Texas Wednesday, the Democrat presidential candidate was greeted by a mere six people. Rather than show warmth and gratitude, however, she chose to ignore them.

No chance. Hillary’s motorcade sped from airport without so much as an obligatory hand-wave:

Meanwhile, 12 News Now reports Clinton was in West Beaumont to attend a fundraiser organized by Pakistani businessman Tahir Javed.

The news station reports the campaign collected about $500,000, making it one of the top five private fundraisers Clinton has had in this country.

Many of the Pakistanis at the event were pleased with Clinton’s vocal support of the Muslim religion, 12 News Now reports.

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 06:16:10

According to the latest CNN poll she is t the frontrunner in Iowa anymore, nor is she in NH.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 06:30:54

Nope. Barring any political shenanigans by the dem and rep establishments, it’s gonna be Trump vs Sanders. And if I were Trump, I wouldn’t underestimate Sanders. That ad of his was a direct invitation to the Trump base.

Comment by rms
2016-01-22 06:54:09

That ad of his was a direct invitation to the Trump base.

Can someone post a YouTube link? I don’t watch television.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
 
Comment by rms
2016-01-23 01:52:13

“Posted above, but here’s linky:”

Thanks for that!

 
 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:53:13

Beginning to feel sorry for Hillary. Is that right?

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 08:10:00

Who, me? Never. Cankles deserves some orange clothing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:26:20

A jumpsuit, to be precise. Hillary in prison would do a great deal to restore my faith in the system.

 
 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 06:28:57

Pretty tough to be cheery and plucky when you’ve learned your odds of being indicted for criminal behavior have increased yet again.

Can you imagine being a liberal this voting cycle? The best your party can do is to present you with Clinton and Sanders?

I thought it would take a few more election cycles for the Democrats to implode. I was wrong.

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 07:25:44

Hahaha. The Lolas and pineapples are enraged!

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 11:38:59

They just don’t have as many clowns in their car.

Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 13:46:17

Trabants are not large vehicles.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:29:30

Pretty tough to be cheery and plucky when you’ve learned your odds of being indicted for criminal behavior have increased yet again.

Hillary’s odds of ever being indicted, much less serving any time, are nil. As a member of the .1% she is literally above the law, and her corruption and evil is sanctioned and enabled by tens of millions of equally corrupt and amoral Democrats who will vote for her no matter what.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 06:31:53

“The destruction of the middle class, begun under Obama…”

If you don’t identify a problem correctly, finding a solution is difficult.

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 06:38:16

I have asked liberal this many times without an answer.

List three (or even one) policy of obama that either:

Created jobs or Grew the middle class

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:51:54

List three (or even one) policy of Bush Jr that either:

Created jobs or Grew the middle class

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:09:41

My bad. I forgot Bush Jr bailed out the banks and auto companies to “save” the yobs.

 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 08:28:57

Is that really your answer?

Seven years of obama, a super majority in the house and a filibuster proof senate…

And we get - oh yeah, well so is your mama (Bush).

The logic of seven year olds.

 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:35:05

The logic of seven year olds.

LOL. Can’t come up with anything, can you?

Obama is doing what Bush did and many other prezidents before him did. No difference.

 
 
Comment by Jimmy Carter is Hitler
2016-01-22 09:26:27

Obama has not helped the problem(and has actually made it worse) but he is not the origin of it. You have to recognize the culpability of both major parties before you can find a real solution. Too many people on both sides of the aisle will only acknowledge the role the “other side” played in it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 10:16:20

the “other side”…

The vast majority of people cannot blame themselves for their mistakes and problems. The mistake that the majority of people have made is consumerism beyond their means facilitated by accumulation of debt. The problems that result are legion. The blame is for the “other” guys.

Your party has been screwing you for decades and you are a partner in it because you bent over and went along. Straighten up and get out of debt. Then you won’t be such an easy target.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:30:46

The destruction of the middle class has been ongoing since 1964, when Johnson and Kenedy instituted uncontrolled Third World immigration, and accelerated in 1971, when Nixon took us off the gold standard and let the banksters run riot with printing press fiat currency.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 06:55:44

2. The destruction of the middle class, begun under obama

I think that began looooooong before Obama was elected. Sure, he contributed to it, but he certainly didn’t start it.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:11:56

No, was all Obama. He also made Track Palin beat up his girlfriend the other day. The man is an evil omnipotent supervillian, and we should all soil our diapers in fear!

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:22:53

“He also made Track Palin beat up his girlfriend the other day.”

I’ve been trying to understand that connection ever since I heard that Palin blamed Track’s personal problems on Obama.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 07:00:54

The destruction of the middle class, begun under obama, will be complete if Hillary wins.

No, it started back in the ’70s. This has been well-documented.

Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton is not the warm and fuzzy type.

She’s wants to be president. It’s a job. I can’t believe that truthrevolt thinks that warmth and fuzziness are requirements for the job.

Many of the Pakistanis at the event were pleased with Clinton’s vocal support of the Muslim religion, 12 News Now reports.

And, of course, we all know why this sentence is included.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 07:24:11

The destruction of the middle class, begun under obama

Begun? Are you that deluded, or just hoping we’re not very bright?

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:49:58

He is that deluded

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-22 13:59:17

Don’t forget, paid to post here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 06:24:08

Bill had no losses in the stock market from 2008-2015. Is it voluntaryist to reap profits from a market propped up by central bankers and fiat money?

Fortunately less than 5 percent of those gains are at risk of being lost when the Bitcoin ATM just stops working.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 06:57:02

“On January 18, 2016, the Bitcoin hash rate had made a gigantic leap towards one quintillion otherwise known as one exahash per second. The historical jump in hash rate hit 986,102,741 GH/s, which is almost making it to the one quintillion position though the numbers have since subsided. The entire month of January has seen a significant increase in the measured factors of total network hashes.”

https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-network-hash-rate-closing-one-quintillion/

Nothing says mania like new-speak that sounds like gibberish to all but insiders.

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 07:28:58

Does this mean someone is creating them out of thin air and now doing so at a crazy increased rate?

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-22 10:49:44

“Does this mean someone is creating them out of thin air and now doing so at a crazy increased rate?”

who does that? oh, banks. my bad.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:31:59

Is it voluntaryist to reap profits from a market propped up by central bankers and fiat money?

Hell ya! It’s always smart to capitalize on the foolish games the corrupt and profligate status-quo plays on us.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-22 10:47:34

Is it voluntaryist to reap profits from a market propped up by central bankers and fiat money?

Hell yeah. Hasten the collapse of crony capitalism.

Is it voluntaryist to get back your social security you and your employer paid in plus interest?

Hell yeah, crowd out government spending of the MIC. Hasten the bankruptcy of the crony capitalist system.

Next question?

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-22 11:16:03

“…is it voluntaryist to…”

Ever do a character study on Ragnar Danneskjold in “Atlas Shrugged?”

If not, wiki him. Learn what he did and why he did it.

Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 19:22:16

It’s fiction dude, just like voluntaryism (and Bitcoin).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 06:45:33

It will be interesting to see what effect the seasonal rise in oil prices (due to taking facilities offline - and the switch to summer grades) will have on the mindset of the market.

Could be that we’ve already seen the short-term low.

Same with the stock market. Wednesday was the interesting day…the markets that day certainly acted as if a short-term low occurred.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 06:48:39

Coordinated media effort/fail

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 07:05:34

Graham on choosing between Trump and Cruz: ‘It’s like being shot or poisoned’

Washington (CNN)—Sen. Lindsey Graham did not mince words Thursday about choosing between Donald Trump or Sen. Ted Cruz, comparing it to a choice between poisoning or being shot.

“It’s like being shot or poisoned,” the South Carolina Republican said. “What does it really matter?”

Graham was asked which of the two presidential candidates he preferred Thursday after going on a rant about both of them at a Capitol Hill press conference. He attached the real estate mogul and the Texas senator to Democratic presidential hopeful Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

“Donald Trump I think is the most unprepared person I’ve ever met to be commander in chief. And when it comes to Sen. Cruz, he’s exhibited behavior in his time in the Senate that make it impossible for me to believe that he could bring this country together,” Graham said.

He added that when it comes to the three men: “If the past is any indication of the future … I think America would be in trouble if any of them got to be president of the United States.”

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/politics/lindsey-graham-donald-trump-ted-cruz-poison-or-shot/index.html

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 07:16:52

LOL, and Graham would be like being poisoned and then shot. A real nasty piece of goods.

Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 09:34:52

NeoCons = Progressives

Not surprising that elitists on both sides of the aisle make statements such as Graham’s.

Not surprising that a progressive would post Graham’s remarks as indicative as some sort of signpost.

MightyMike, you are a progressive. You also are a NeoCon.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 09:45:24

I don’t think so. Then again, maybe only you know what you mean when you such wacky labels like neocon.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 10:03:25

I would phrase it this way.

Progressives = Neo Libs = Neo cons

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:16:22

Now you sound like Sarah Palin. All that’s needed is a “you betcha” at the end of each string of word salad.

 
 
 
 
Comment by BlueCollarMale
2016-01-22 07:30:51

CNN and Milky now care what Lindsey Graham thinks? Funny, CNN poll comes out showing Trump and Sanders up big in Iowa and they feature this story rather than the one about their own most recent poll.

Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 09:38:57

The populace clearly is telling the Establishment that they’re sick of their sh*t. The Establishment on both sides of the aisle are freaking out.

Good.

I may not like the Left, but I appreciate their push to tell the Establishment to stick it. I didn’t expect this to happen until 2020.

It’s been happening on the Right for a while now.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 11:40:35

There is just a little to much shit in this election sandwich.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:42:45

I read that as a good thing. Nobody has run as a pro war as him.

If you are tired of wars, don’t vote for me. –Lindsey Graham

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 08:21:11

Donald Trump. An esteemed statesman with a squad of sexy strumpets.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 09:01:27

As opposed to a bunch of sniveling crypto-Nazis with floppy trouser trouts.

 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 07:49:26

Against Trump
The Editors
The National Review

“Trump is a philosophically unmoored political opportunist who would trash the broad conservative ideological consensus within the GOP in favor of a free-floating populism with strongman overtones.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430137/donald-trump-conservative-movement-menace

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 07:57:24

These fookers supported who?

Ray-gun
Bush Sr
Bush Jr
McCain
Romney

They have no reason to complain about Trump.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 08:05:36

Amen. The NRO is ugly, and it wants to die.

I was watching some old clips of the Buckley-Vidal point counterpoints on youtube. Loved it when Vidal called Cuckley a crypto-Nazi.

Anyway, the NRO dissing Trump is a YUUUUGE endorsement.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 08:15:32

FWIW, this just in from Trump’s Twitter feed. The RNC just b*tch-slapped NRO.

“Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 48m48 minutes ago
The failing @NRO National Review Magazine has just been informed by the Republican National Committee that they cannot participate in debate”

Flush that rag. It’s no longer relevant.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 08:38:20

National Review Magazine has just been informed by the Republican National Committee that they cannot participate in debate”

The GOP is getting Trumped.

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 09:05:31

To be fair, I think given the tone of the NRO’s sniveling screed, they kind of have to do that because of the blatant bias that would be inappropriate to any debate. Not that these cattle calls even remotely resemble debates, but that’s what they call them.

No loss. The NRO stands for nothing but war and the MIC.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:19:17

The GOP establishment has embraced trump. All you freethinkers will be Trumplings by summer, and deny you ever had a doubt.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Red Pill
2016-01-22 08:30:52

This list of contributors looks like a who’s who of RINOs, Neocons, Globalists and at least one media turn coat.

I think this only helps Trump.

Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 09:19:06

Strictly hypothetical, but imagine if some Ammon Bundy types turned their efforts away from some worthless bird sanctuary and decided to occupy Aspen while all the globalists pigmen were convening there.

Again hypothetical, but were the airport and all planes and helicopters there destroyed, there is only one paved road open year round in and out of the Roaring Fork Valley.

With strategic roadblocks on CO 82 blocking passage to I-70, eastbound over Independence Pass (only open May to October), and unpaved Pearl Pass Road to Crested Butte, the globalist pigs would have no escape.

Hypothetical of course, but just picture some very fat bears feeding on the corpses of some Goldman Sachs bankers and hedge fund pigs, and most importantly, Bono.

Comment by palmetto
2016-01-22 09:37:12

Lol, sounds like something out of Matt Bracken.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 09:58:13

I’m not denying his influence on this idea.

I am intimately familiar with the geography of the mountains around Aspen, it is some pretty unforgiving terrain, two of my friends have died there in climbing accidents. The Castle Creek Valley is not nicknamed the “Valley of Death” without good reason…

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 10:12:39

Those Bundy people are good, conservative, pro-business Republicans. They respect all of finance people because capitalism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 10:46:35

This paid message sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:35:21

Someday, Mikey, I hold out the hope you’ll say something that is actually value-added. Sadly, today isn’t the day, again.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:42:59

Wouldn’t those globalists have heavily armed bodyguards to begin with? And do you doubt for a split second that elite US military teams would swoop in to rescue the pigmen were that to happen?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 10:58:34

Rockstar, don’t be such a buzzkill.

Were a vial of polonium to mysteriously crack open in the middle of the Aspen Ideas Institute while George Soros was speaking from the lecturn to an assembly of pigs, it would be no loss to the world.

Read about how Alexander Litvinenko died, he basically went from healthy to stage 4 cancer in less than a month.

 
 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2016-01-22 09:45:00

It does help Trump.

I am not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing.

It will be fun to see what happens once NY Times and other leftist media outlets endorse Clinton OR Sanders.

The National Review is the first of many MSM outlets that may find themselves in one hell of a quandary.

Again, good.

 
 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-22 11:25:51

Like a Facebook article by Jeffrey Tucker said, the National Review promotes the same exact issues Trump promotes, and can only focus on Trump as the personality.

The article should have been about whether Trump is fascist or not. It cannot. National Review is fascist.

 
 
Comment by butters
2016-01-22 08:22:20

Only in Florida.

West Palm Beach man decapitates dog to ‘cleanse himself’

 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 08:35:33

Government + health care = votes of the FSA

That is why.

—————————

Why Is There No Uber For Health Care?
01/21/2016 - IBD

Health Care: Ask anyone why health costs are so high, and one of the answers is likely to be “technology.” But why does technology add costs in health care when it lowers costs everywhere else?

‘Why isn’t there an Uber of health care?” That’s the question that Manhattan Institute health care expert Avik Roy asks in the opening of a must-read paper, “Health Care 2.0: Ushering In Medicine’s Digital Revolution.”

“Why can’t we deploy, in health care, the same forces that are improving quality and lowering costs in virtually every other sector of the economy?”

Here’s a typical explanation: “Medical advances can help us get well, avoid disease and delay death, but they also drive up spending,” says an NPR report. “Patients and doctors often demand the newest treatments, even if there is little or no evidence that they are better.”

In any other context, such a statement would be ludicrous. Why would any consumer demand a more expensive product if they had no idea whether it would work?

Roy correctly points to a huge, if largely unrecognized, problem in health care — the rise of third-party payments. The reason patients demand the latest technology, no matter the cost, is that they aren’t paying the bills — an insurance company or the government is.

The clearest trend in health care is that steady increase in third-party payments. Government data show that in 1960, insurers and governments paid about half the nation’s health care bills. Today, that figure is 89%. By 2024, it’s expected to hit 90%.

This trend is driven almost entirely by bad tax law — which provides an unlimited tax exemption for employer-provided health insurance — and government policy, which is increasingly subsidizing insurance or paying bills directly.

With so few cost-conscious consumers out there, there’s little incentive to create cost-saving products and services. At the same time, providers can charge far more than they would otherwise, knowing the direct consumer is largely indifferent to the price.

Roy points to a 20-year-old treatment for multiple sclerosis, Avonex. It costs six times today what it did in 1996, “despite the fact that over the intervening two decades, new drugs have emerged (that are) significantly more effective.” That would never happen in a functional marketplace.

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 10:39:32

Why Is There No Uber For Health Care?

The AMA would never allow it.

Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 10:56:11

The AMA would never allow it.

Wrong answer - try again.

Hint: The AMA has no power. Who would lose power? Who would lose votes?

Comment by In Colorado
2016-01-22 13:15:57

Of course the AMA has power. They determine who can become an MD, and they keep the numbers down. Heck, they control the number of students in medical school.

An “Uber for healthcare” implies that anyone could practice medicine. I can guarantee you that the AMA would not allow that. Sure, they will use the state (FDA) to enforce their monopoly, but that’s what it is, a monopoly, and they control it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 14:42:28

2ban’s brain can’t comprehend that.

Look, Obama! He’s bad mama jamma!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 09:16:04

They only failed because there was too little socialism…

————–

With Democrats In Charge The Result Is Racism,Rape,Riots,And Poison Water
Breitbart.com | January 22, 2016 | John Nolte

Pop quiz: Who almost exclusively has run Hollywood, America’s university system, and almost every big urban city in America, and done so for decades? The answer is more complicated than “Democrats.” Most of the people who run these institutions and communities are so much more than Democrats. They are leftists — hardcore, government-loving, Alinsky-worshipping, central planning, community-organizing leftists.

And yet, when they enjoy free rein for decades, take a hard look at the utopia these utopians create.

Let’s start with Hollywood, which is about as hard-left as any institution in the country. What we have here is a community run by leftists currently embroiled in a huge race scandal. For two years in a row, only white actors have been nominated for performance Oscars. Where leftists have enjoyed unchallenged rule for decades, 40 out of 40 acting nominations have gone to Whitey.

According to the left-wing mainstream media, there is a rape crisis rampaging though America’s university system. If you choose to believe the studies and reports, campus rape is a full-blown epidemic. How is this possible when for decades hardcore leftists have enjoyed unchallenged rule over America’s higher education system. There are exceptions, of course, like Liberty University, where there is no rape cris– oh, wait, Liberty is run by conservative Christians.

On top of all that rape, according to the leftists who for decades have run the American university system, there is a major racism problem at the very same American university system Leftists… have… run… for… decades…

Leftists take over Hollywood and the result is racism.

Leftists take over the college campus and the result is racism and rape.

And I’m just getting started.

The city of Flint, Michigan, has been imploding since the 1980’s. Now, due to mismanagement by city officials, the water is poisoned with lead. In every way imaginable, the city is an arm-pit. But how is that possible when Utopian-Democrats have run the city unchallenged for years? How is that possible when in 2006, Flint was voted the 10th most liberal city in America?

According to our left-wing media, armed, racist government-employees (police officers) who are employed by Democrats (mayors) in cities run for decades by Democrats, are gunning down innocent black people: Chicago, Baltimore, Ferguson (which is run by the St. Louis county), and in some of those cases, riots follow.

The youth black unemployment rate is an astonishing 21%. Don’t most of these young people live in Liberal Utopias?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:36:34

I love it when leftists get what they vote for and what they deserve.

 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 09:38:44

Bought a used car? Meh.

Pay a grossly inflated price for a rapidly depreciating house doubling your monthly shelter costs and saddling yourself with a lifetime of debt?

Priceless.

Lesson? Don’t be a DebtDonkey.

http://goo.gl/jXiSsk

Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 10:07:51

First time homeloaners are the oldest young people I know.

All the spark of life is gone, they have no creativity or spontaneity.

People with mortgages are living one foot in the grave.

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-01-22 11:22:59

It’s been like that for decades. They become less creative with their skills they were educated about and they tend to focus on home repairs.

Dullards.

Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 11:43:30

Loanowners are spiritually and physically broken people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 13:07:07

A mortgage on a house you could not afford to buy is a Faustian bargain. A lifetime of slavery exchanged for a day of feeling wealthy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-01-22 15:56:32

“Pay a grossly inflated price for a rapidly depreciating house doubling your monthly shelter costs and saddling yourself with a lifetime of debt?”

Why do you hate our freedoms?

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-22 10:19:02

BREAKING NEWS
Three weeks into new year, more than 200 people shot in Chicago
Deanese Williams-Harris and Alexandra Chachkevitch
Three men were killed and seven other people were wounded in Chicago on Thursday through early Friday as the number of shooting victims in the city passed 200 three weeks into the new year.

Chicago police, Cook County sheriff’s office team up in gang fight

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 10:22:15

Natural selection at work.

Comment by butters
2016-01-22 10:44:07

Raycis!

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 11:30:42

Everybody is racist. We just suppress it to varying degree.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 13:14:04

Yep you do a pretty good job.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-01-22 20:39:59

My girlfriend is black, so that helps. There is still a very hot racial dynamic in play though…

 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 10:37:45

No worries - dead or alive - democrats vote.

Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-22 11:14:13

@2B:
“Democrats vote”
There is an old saying in Chicago - Vote early, vote often; a generally tongue-in-cheek phrase used in relation to the activities of organized crime figures in Chicago.

CLOUT STREET
Mayor Emanuel: Gov. Rauner ‘can’t get out of his own way’ on important issues
John Byrne
Days after Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner called him out as a “failure” on critical issues, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said his onetime ally should show as much energy in finding solutions to problems facing the state as he has in name-calling.

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 10:40:20

Existing-Home Sales Surge Back in December

WASHINGTON (January 22, 2016) — Existing-home sales snapped back solidly in December as more buyers reached the market before the end of the year, and the delayed closings resulting from the rollout of the Know Before You Owe initiative pushed a portion of November’s would-be transactions into last month’s figure, according to the National Association of Realtors®. Led by the South and West, all four major regions saw large increases in December.

Total existing-home sales1, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, ascended 14.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.46 million in December from 4.76 million in November. After last month’s turnaround (the largest monthly increase ever recorded), sales are now 7.7 percent above a year ago.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, says December’s robust bounce back caps off the best year of existing sales (5.26 million) since 2006 (6.48 million). “While the carryover of November’s delayed transactions into December contributed greatly to the sharp increase, the overall pace taken together indicates sales these last two months maintained the healthy level of activity seen in most of 2015,” he said. “Additionally, the prospect of higher mortgage rates in coming months and warm November and December weather allowed more homes to close before the end of the year.”

The median existing-home price2 for all housing types in December was $224,100, up 7.6 percent from December 2014 ($208,200). Last month’s price increase marks the 46th consecutive month of year-over-year gains.

Total housing inventory3 at the end of December dropped 12.3 percent to 1.79 million existing homes available for sale, and is now 3.8 percent lower than a year ago (1.86 million). Unsold inventory is at a 3.9-month supply at the current sales pace, down from 5.1 months in November and the lowest since January 2005 (3.6 months).

“Although some growth is expected, the housing market will struggle in 2016 to replicate last year’s 7 percent increase in sales,” adds Yun. “In addition to insufficient supply levels, the overall pace of sales this year will be constricted by tepid economic expansion, rising mortgage rates and decreasing demand for buying in oil-producing metro areas.”

http://www.realtor.org/news-releases/2016/01/existing-home-sales-surge-back-in-december

 
Comment by Donald Trump
2016-01-22 10:42:04

One of the problems when you become successful is that jealousy and envy inevitably follow. There are people — I categorize them as life’s losers — who get their sense of accomplishment and achievement from trying to stop others.

Comment by Goon
2016-01-22 11:12:43

And then they graduate with a Masters Degree in Victim Studies with $80,000 of student loans and get a job pouring my coffee or detailing my cars.

Comment by rms
2016-01-23 02:17:22

“…a Masters Degree in Victim Studies with $80,000 of student loans…”

ROTFLMFAO!!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:31:34

Morning Mix
The unbelievable story of why Woody Guthrie hated Donald Trump’s dad
By Justin Wm. Moyer
January 22 at 4:50 AM

Woody Guthrie, folk singer supreme, is known for the magisterial portraits he painted of Dust Bowl America and his sweeping indictments of social injustice. What’s not there in the beautiful imagery of his song “This Land Is Your Land” — the ribbon of highway, the endless skyway, the diamond deserts — is right there in the slogan often affixed to his guitar: “This machine kills fascists.”

But artists who traffic in grand themes are also allowed to get specific. In one of the strangest stories yet to emerge from Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, it appears that, more than half a century ago, Woody Guthrie penned lyrics condemning the candidate’s father, Fred Trump, for racism.

“Donald did inherit his father’s racism, and was probably actively coached in his father’s racism, and worked with his father to perpetuate it,” argued Will Kaufman, the professor of American literature and culture at Britain’s University of Central Lancashire who unearthed the scoop, said in a telephone interview with The Washington Post. “He picked up the mantle and ran with it with his father at his side. That’s why people are interested in this I think.”

Trump has been repeatedly accused of racism after his comments about Mexicans and has repeatedly denied such charges. “I don’t have a racist bone in my body,” he has said.

The story begins with Kaufman, the author of one book about Guthrie already at work on another and a performer of the folk hero’s music, sifting through the Guthrie archives in Tulsa last year. There, in one of Guthrie’s notebooks — which contain pages upon pages of lyrics never set to music — he found these lines, written in the early 1950s:

I suppose
Old Man Trump knows
Just how much
Racial Hate
he stirred up
In the bloodpot of human hearts
When he drawed
That color line
Here at his
Eighteen hundred family project

There was also this:

Beach Haven ain’t my home!
I just cain’t pay this rent!
My money’s down the drain!
And my soul is badly bent!
Beach Haven looks like heaven
Where no black ones come to roam!
No, no, no! Old Man Trump!
Old Beach Haven ain’t my home!

“Beach Haven,” it turns out, was an apartment building erected by Fred Trump — that is, “Old Man Trump,” who died in 1999 — in New York to house large numbers of veterans returning from World War II. Guthrie, who served in the Merchant Marine, was among them. As Kaufman recounted in a story first published at the Conversation, the singer moved there in 1950.

“When Guthrie first signed his lease, it’s unlikely that he was aware of the murky background to the construction of his new home, the massive public complex that Trump had dubbed ‘Beach Haven,’” Kaufman wrote. “Trump would be investigated by a U.S. Senate committee in 1954 for profiteering off of public contracts, not least by overestimating his Beach Haven building charges to the tune of US$3.7 million.”

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-01-22 11:06:39

Yikes - maybe this company should be renamed Slumpberger?

Schlumberger Ltd - 10,000 job cuts

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 11:09:47

Amnesty says Kurds waging campaign to uproot Arabs in north Iraq

ERBIL, IRAQ

Kurdish forces have bulldozed, blown up and burned down thousands of Arab homes across northern Iraq in what may constitute a war crime, human rights watchdog Amnesty International said in a report published on Wednesday.

Amnesty said it found evidence of a “concerted campaign” by the Kurds to uproot Arab communities in revenge for their perceived support of Islamic State, which seized control of about one third of Iraq in the summer of 2014.

Kurdish peshmerga forces have since driven the insurgents back in the north of Iraq with the help of air strikes from a U.S.-led coalition, expanding their control to include ethnically mixed territories they claim as their own.

“KRG (Kurdistan Regional Government) forces appear to be spearheading a concerted campaign to forcibly displace Arab communities by destroying entire villages in areas they have recaptured from IS (Islamic State) in northern Iraq,” Amnesty’s Donatella Rovera said.

“The forced displacement of civilians and the deliberate destruction of homes and property without military justification, may amount to war crimes.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-amnesty-iraq-idUSKCN0UY0JE

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:37:57

Our allies engaging in ethnic cleansing?! Inconceivable!

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 11:14:24

Uh oh, Putin: Nobody seems to trust your currency

Russia has fallen victim to two of the classic blunders. The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia—oops—but only slightly less well-known is this: never think an oil-exporting business can substitute for having an actual economy.

Double oops.

The latest news is that Russia’s ruble is free-falling again. It’s dropped 12 percent since the start of the year, and as much as 5 percent on Thursday alone, before rallying a bit up to 83 per dollar. It climbed further Friday as oil had a good day. Even then, though, it’s still lower than it was a little over a year ago when a run on the ruble forced the government to jack up interest rates to prevent people from losing all faith in the currency. In other words, yesterday’s panic-driven fear has become today’s grim reality.

The simple story, as I’ve mentioned, is that Russia doesn’t have much of an economy other than its oil-exporting business, which is to say that it doesn’t have much of an economy at all anymore. China’s slowdown means that there isn’t as much demand for the black stuff, but, more importantly, there’s just a glut of it. Between the shale revolution, Saudi Arabia’s refusal to turn off any of its taps, and Iran’s nuclear sanctions being lifted, the International Energy Agency estimates that the oil market is oversupplied by 1.5 million barrels-a-day. The result, at least for now, has been a 75 percent drop in the price of oil the last 18 months, down to $30-a-barrel. That’s so low that some shale producers should start going out of business, at which point supply should come down and prices go up— well, except for two problems. The first is that so many shale drillers borrowed so much money that they can’t afford to stop drilling, and the second is that, even if they do, it’s pretty easy for them to turn their wells off or on as needed. That means that, at worst, they’ll be forced into hibernation and come out of it as soon as prices bounce back up to, say, $60-a-barrel, setting a ceiling there.

So even if things get better, they’ll still be bad for Russia. Consider this: its economy shrank 3.7 percent in 2015, and the International Monetary Fund expects it to contract another 1 percent this year based on the now-generous assumption that oil will average $42-a-barrel. And its budget doesn’t look any better. Oil revenues, after all, make up half of the government’s revenues. So even its just-announced 10 percent cut in spending might not be enough since that was based on the hope that oil will rebound to $50-a-barrel. It doesn’t help, of course, that the state-controlled bank VEB might need as big as an $18 billion bailout. How can you tell things are getting serious? Well, other than the fact that Russian oligarchs aren’t buying nearly as much high-end art in London anymore? Try this: Russia’s top officials have said it might be forced to cut its oil production to try to prop up the price, conceding defeat—and market share—in its cold war with Saudi Arabia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/22/uh-oh-putin-nobody-seems-to-trust-your-currency/

Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 13:43:54

which is to say that it doesn’t have much of an economy at all anymore.

Russia’s GDP is anywhere from 1.8 to 2 trillions. That sounds like a top 10 economy to me.

Is this a piece of propaganda? Washington Pravda is printing it and mighty mouse is loving it…..I guess it has to be.

Total external public and private debt owed:

USA - 16 Trillions
Russia - 630 billions

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 11:45:17

Schlumberger to Cut 10,000 Jobs
Energy industry layoffs have moved into six figures, a number bolstered by the decision of Schlumberger to cut 10,000 people.

Lower prices are great for the economy, unless you sell stuff

Comment by Puggs
2016-01-22 12:44:15

It’s a vicious cycle that repeats itself because people can’t help themselves to NOT be greedy. How many of those Schlumbergers that made 100K elected to have an emergency fund in lieu of a 50K Dodge Ram??

Slow and steady…

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 13:12:19

The only shame in cut bubble jobs is that they ever existed. We all paid too much for years to support the mania.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 14:24:49

What do layoffs do to the economy and do they add to the number of entitlements?

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 13:32:43

Lower prices are great for the economy, unless you sell stuff

In other words, they’re good for some people and disastrous others, just like higher prices.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 15:00:47

disastrous…

Higher prices were brought on by speculation by those who hoped to get rich from the misfortune of others, by hoarding necessities and overproducing goods with borrowed money. Their “disaster” is a good thing too.

Good all around.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 15:10:00

It’s good all around only if you forget about those ten thousand people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 16:47:51

Oh, those people.

We work at a bubble job at great risk to our security. Make bank and save it, win. Live it up and take out long term liabilities, lose. Should we feel sorry for them having a bonanza for a few years and then having to deal with reality? I don’t think so.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 17:08:21

This distinction between bubble jobs and other jobs is much less clear than you think. We’re talking about people who live and work in a given economy over which they have no control. They sought out employment for the same reason that everyone else does and found it. Now, ten thousand people will become unemployed. They’re not getting fired for poor performance. They’re losing their jobs due to developments in the global economy. I have as much as sympathy for them as I would for any group of 10,000 who lose their livelihoods for reasons beyond their control.

However, all of that is irrelevant to what we were debating previously.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-01-22 17:55:31

Better 10,000 lose their bubble job than billions of others pay grossly inflated prices.

*Read.Think.Learn.*

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 17:59:51

Of course Mike. Poor kids who made double regular pay to work a boom. BTDT. Booms are temporary. Don’t cry over the end of a boom any more than you did that they signed on for a temporary gig. They are not entitled to an eternal boom. Now they will just live like they did before and hopefully they did not borrow up. If they did, sympathy will not help them.

 
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-22 16:10:41

Who cares? Our economy is now based on $15 burgers, $4 donuts, and $5 double scoops of premium ice cream. Oh yeah, and a microbrewery on every corner.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 16:35:03

a microbrewery on every corner.

I like that part.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 18:05:05

I’ve got a couple of $2.50 sirloin burgers on the grill right now.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-01-22 19:25:08

Excellent. Starve the foodie beast while eating well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 11:52:05

Dark Money review: Nazi oil, the Koch brothers and a rightwing revolution

Lots of American industrialists have skeletons in the family closet. Charles and David Koch, however, are in a league of their own.

The father of these famous rightwing billionaires was Fred Koch, who started his fortune with $500,000 received from Stalin for his assistance constructing 15 oil refineries in the Soviet Union in the 1930s. A couple of years later, his company, Winkler-Koch, helped the Nazis complete their third-largest oil refinery. The facility produced hundreds of thousands of gallons of high-octane fuel for the Luftwaffe, until it was destroyed by Allied bombs in 1944.

In 1938, the patriarch wrote that “the only sound countries in the world are Germany, Italy and Japan”. To make sure his children got the right ideas, he hired a German nanny. The nanny was such a fervent Nazi that when France fell in 1940, she resigned and returned to Germany. After that, Fred became the main disciplinarian, whipping his children with belts and tree branches.

These are just a handful of the many bombshells exploded in the pages of Dark Money, Jane Mayer’s indispensable new history “of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right” in the US.

A veteran investigative reporter and a staff writer for the New Yorker, Mayer has combined her own research with the work of scores of other investigators, to describe how the Kochs and fellow billionaires like Richard Scaife have spent hundreds of millions to “move their political ideas from the fringe to the center of American political life”.

Twenty years after collaborating with the Nazis, Fred Koch had lost none of his taste for extremism. In 1958, he was one of the 11 original members of the John Birch Society, an organization which accused scores of prominent Americans, including President Dwight Eisenhower, of communist sympathies.

In 1960, Koch wrote: “The colored man looms large in the Communist plan to take over America.” He strongly supported the movement to impeach chief justice Earl Warren, after the supreme court voted to desegregate public schools in Brown v Board of Education. His sons became Birchers too, although Charles was more enamored of “antigovernment economic writers” than communist conspiracies.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/17/dark-money-review-nazi-oil-the-koch-brothers-and-a-rightwing-revolution

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 12:51:49

Stalin -> Hitler -> Koch Bros -> America’s New Right

Now I see why they’re always comparing progressives to Stalin: They’re trying to cover their own tracks, and guilty consciences.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:40:02

I bet over at HuffPo they swoon over such drivel.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 15:33:21

Which part is drivel? The Kochs’ fortune originally came from their father working for Stalin and Hitler, building military-related infrastructure for those mass-murderers, being paid with money stolen from their victims. The fortune that created now funds the Cato Institutes of today.

And now you know…the rest of the story.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 13:19:30

Regardless of the overall picture, the belt or the switch were not considered an evil crime in those days. “Spare the rod and spoil the child” and all that.

Two generations later, those kowtowing to totalitarian governments for profit are glorified. What will future historical commentators say of Armand Hammer, Apple, Nike and the likes of the Clintons?

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 11:56:15

Trump v Sanders

http://drudgereport.com/nosp.htm

will brains win?

Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 12:55:02

Brooklyn College vs Fordham

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 13:31:10

Choosing Palin to speak vs opposing the war with Iraq.

Comment by The Order Of The Golden Chainsaw
2016-01-22 14:50:56

America firster or Israel firster?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 15:36:41

Who’s more pro-Israel, Trump or Hillary?

Trump finally got his long-sought private meeting with Sheldon Adelson. What was discussed?

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-01-22 15:44:00

Trump: No Greater Enemy to Israel than Obama

‘I speak to my Jewish friends. I say, how are supporting this man? He’s the worst thing that ever has happened to Israel.’

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2016-01-22 13:22:40

Only bigger and bigger government with higher and higher taxes and more and more regulations can save us!

the best. political ad. ever.

For Trump. Raise your hand if you want a 33% increase in your taxes to pay for illegals and refugees….

“They’ve all come to look for America” and found a huge, expensive and inefficient bureaucracy….

——————–

Sanders Makes a Rare Pitch: More Taxes for More Government
New York Times - 1/22/2016

Senator Bernie Sanders’s health care plan is advancing a notion that has long been out of fashion in American politics: that the federal government should provide a new, expensive service to most Americans, and that it should levy significantly higher taxes on most Americans to provide that service.

His campaign estimates that his plan to cover all Americans with a zero-deductible, zero-co-pay health plan will add $1.38 trillion a year to government spending. There are reasons to think that estimate is optimistically low, but even if it’s correct it’s still a lot of money: Paying for it would require increasing federal tax receipts by about a third, and Mr. Sanders has a plan to do so.

 
Comment by Larry Littlefield
2016-01-22 13:32:53

From the WSJ (full article behind paywall).

http://www.wsj.com/articles/investing-in-2016-the-only-winning-move-is-not-to-play-the-game-1453485940

“The world’s central banks can’t save us anymore. That was the message from some of the world’s most prominent investors at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Friday.”

“There isn’t an existential worry about financial assets. It’s just that they are priced too high.”

“A shift in sentiment seemed to be taking hold. Annual growth of the old order—3% to 4% for the U.S. and other Western economies, is far away. Absent structural changes led by governments, there was little reason to be cheered.”

“There may be a paradigm shift we have to accept with demographics in Europe: It’s not that bad to have zero-percent inflation. We were preoccupied with 2% inflation, but just because it’s been that way for 40 to 50 years doesn’t mean it has to remain that way.”

“We plan our future with the Japanese environment in mind. That is our base scenario.”

Worth reading, if you have a sub.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-01-22 15:44:56

Search by the title and it will let you read it all without a sub.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:33:45

“There isn’t an existential worry about financial assets. It’s just that they are priced too high.”

Did anyone at Davos put two and two together to deduce that ZIRP and QE were key factors in driving asset prices sky high?

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-01-22 14:05:41

This is a good one.

How an obscure adviser to Pat Buchanan predicted the wild Trump campaign in 1996

http://theweek.com/articles/599577/how-obscure-adviser-pat-buchanan-predicted-wild-trump-campaign-1996

key excerpts:

Imagine giving this advice to a Republican presidential candidate: What if you stopped calling yourself a conservative and instead just promised to make America great again?

What if you dropped all this leftover 19th-century piety about the free market and promised to fight the elites who were selling out American jobs? What if you just stopped talking about reforming Medicare and Social Security and instead said that the elites were failing to deliver better health care at a reasonable price? What if, instead of vainly talking about restoring the place of religion in society — something that appeals only to a narrow slice of Middle America — you simply promised to restore the Middle American core — the economic and cultural losers of globalization — to their rightful place in America? What if you said you would restore them as the chief clients of the American state under your watch, being mindful of their interests when regulating the economy or negotiating trade deals?

also:

What so frightens the conservative movement about Trump’s success is that he reveals just how thin the support for their ideas really is. His campaign is a rebuke to their institutions. It says the Republican Party doesn’t need all these think tanks, all this supposed policy expertise. It says look at these people calling themselves libertarians and conservatives, the ones in tassel-loafers and bow ties. Have they made you more free? Have their endless policy papers and studies and books conserved anything for you? These people are worthless. They are defunct. You don’t need them, and you’re better off without them.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 14:41:31

Shockingly, out of left field, MightyMike actually posts something of value. The earth must’ve tilted off it’s axis….

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 15:04:07

Exactly.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:42:09

“What so frightens the conservative movement about Trump’s success is that he reveals just how thin the support for their ideas really is.”

That’s why the campaign emphasizes attacks on groups and individuals who aren’t Trump, plus Trump’s vast personal wealth, instead of real policy proposals.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2016-01-22 15:29:45

Well played TXchik.

Not bad for one week!

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 16:23:46

Brother SH, thanks for the tip on HES. Made a nice little score off that when I sold today.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 15:39:45

This is the end game for the socialist utopia the Pineapples and their ilk have in store for ‘Murica, once they have their permanent Democrat supermajority.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-22/what-death-nation-looks-venezuela-prepares-720-hyperinflation

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-01-22 15:59:29

Syrian woman schools neocon war-monger John McCain at town hall.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MAQBMNPf7M

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-01-22 16:05:04

The sea was angry today my friends, like a NOAA spokesman refusing to turn over internal communications surrounding a recent climate change study that overturned the previous settled science that showed there had been no “global warming” since January 1997.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 16:39:29

“Internal communications” of the Ministry of Truth will not be turned over. The thought police reign of this administration is getting short. We hope for an upturning, and some real truth.

 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-01-22 16:12:16

we need more currency in the system so stocks and homes go up in price.

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-01-22 16:40:41

Hopes to be dashed. Work and pay off your debts Donkey.

 
 
Comment by Realtors Are Liars®
2016-01-22 19:45:10

realtors are liars

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 20:45:14

I guess Trump is making quite a splash in Davos?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 21:07:51

Race for the White House
The Specter of Donald Trump Is Haunting Davos
Jeff Black
January 21, 2016 — 1:46 AM PST
Donald Trump Hits Ted Cruz, Says ‘Goldman Sachs Owns Him’

If Donald Trump as president of the United States is the ghost that’s stalking Davos, many among the global elite hope he’ll be banished by spring. Others see that as wishful thinking.

“I think the nominees will be Donald Trump for the Republicans and Hillary Clinton” for the Democrats, Donald Baer, a former White House adviser under President Bill Clinton, said at a panel co-hosted by Bloomberg and WPP Plc. “The next year will be a very uncertain, chaotic period.”

The prospect of Trump in the White House is ratcheting up anxiety among the 2,500 business and political leaders gathered at the Swiss ski resort for the annual World Economic Forum. With less than two weeks before voting in primaries gets under way and Trump in the Republican Party lead, those who fear a rise in protectionism and economic mismanagement are speaking out against the billionaire property developer.

“Unfortunately I do think that if there were to be a Trump administration the casualty would likely be trade,” said Eric Cantor, a former Republican House Majority Leader and now vice chairman of Moelis & Company. “That’s a very serious prospect for the world.”
‘Disaster’

Cantor said he doesn’t think Trump will make it through the primaries, a common theme among Davos attendees who nevertheless are still talking about him. Trump’s positions –like a “temporary” ban on Muslims entering the country and the building of a wall on the Mexican border — are earning him opprobrium in the mountain resort.

He has also railed at the loss of U.S. jobs to overseas competitors, and on Tuesday said that as president he would “get Apple to start building their damn computers and things” in the U.S., instead of China. A Trump administration would be a “disaster,” according to Beth Brooke-Marciniak, global vice chair of public policy at Ernst & Young LLP and a former adviser to the U.S. Treasury in the Clinton administration.

“The globe needs the U.S. to be strong,” she said. “The U.S. is still the horse that’s pulling the cart, and more so now with the capital outflows from emerging markets.”
Populist Wave

The presidential race shows that the U.S. is not immune to the wave of populism sweeping the globe. In the U.S. case, the economy has recovered faster than other developed nations from the global slump of 2008 and 2009, and yet wages haven’t kept pace with a rebound in corporate profits. That’s helping candidates like Trump and Bernie Sanders who say the system is rigged against average Americans.

While Trump’s specter looms large, not many assume he’ll actually make it to the White House.

“I am amazed at Davos about how many people are taking Trump as seriously as they are,” said Martin Sorrell, WPP’s chief executive. “I think it doesn’t matter who the Republicans put up, I think Hillary will win.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 21:09:56

George Soros: Donald Trump is doing the work of Isis
Speaking at a dinner in Davos, the veteran billionaire launched an attack on the Republican nomination frontrunner, as well as Ted Cruz and Vladimir Putin
George Soros at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Photograph: Pascal Lauener/REUTERS
Larry Elliott in Davos
Thursday 21 January 2016 17.37 EST
Last modified on Friday 22 January 2016 07.47 EST

The veteran billionaire speculator and philanthropist, George Soros, has launched an astonishing attack on Donald Trump, accusing the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for the US presidency of “doing the work” of Islamic State.

Speaking at a dinner in Davos, Soros broke off from giving his views on the fragile state of global financial markets and the migration crisis to decry Trump and Ted Cruz, a rival Republican, of driving muslims to terrorism.

“By fear-mongering, he and [Ted] Cruz are doing the work of Isis,” Soros said.

“They want people to turn against the Muslim community and make the Muslim community think there is no alternative to terrorism. It turns the Muslim community into a breeding ground for Isis.”

Trump caused controversy when he said there should be “a complete and total ban” on Muslims entering the US.

Trump’s words brought a strong response from Soros, who said it was “harmful” when people did things out of fear.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 21:13:09

Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:31pm EST
Davos elite alarmed at prospect of nominee Trump
DAVOS, Switzerland | By Carmel Crimmins and Martinne Geller
A supporter of U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump tries to get the crowd fired up at a campaign rally at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, Oklahoma January 20, 2016.
Reuters/Nick Oxford

“Unbelievable”, “embarrassing” even “dangerous” are some of the words the financial elite gathered at the World Economic Forum conference in the Swiss resort of Davos have been using to describe U.S. Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump.

Although some said they still expected his campaign to founder before his party picks its nominee for the November election many said it was no longer unthinkable that he could be the Republican candidate.

Some noted that whatever the outcome, a heated campaign, which has also seen self-proclaimed Socialist Bernie Sanders provide a tough challenge to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, could alter the U.S. political environment, giving vent to new populist anger on both sides of the political divide.

Trump’s nationalist rhetoric, particularly proposals to ban Muslims from entering the United States, tax goods made abroad and build a wall on the Mexican border, were never the sort of thing to appeal to the free trade crowd that typically gathers at events like the annual Davos economic forum.

Former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan said if Donald Trump wants to be a good negotiator as president, he’ll need to listen more than demanding his own way.

“Clearly it is not a rhetoric that is inviting for integration,” said Chile’s Finance Minister, Rodrigo Valdes, referring to his comments on the campaign trail.

“In Chile we have a deep view that integration of the Americas is a good thing, whether it is goods, financing and yes people. So I’d be happier with a more welcoming rhetoric.”

Among the present and former government officials in the Swiss resort was Eric Cantor, former Republican majority leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, now vice-chairman of Moelis & Co, an investment bank. Like much of the Republican party’s establishment, he had cold words for Trump.

“He’s not serious. He’s amazing at promoting his personal brand and reflecting an underlying anger at home,” Cantor said.

“Trump Fever is an unsustainable phenomenon that will not translate into a victory for the candidate.”
..

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 21:10:56

Is your support for Trump driven more by fear or by hatred?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-01-22 21:16:11

I love my Republican wife:

Hillary would be better than Trump. That’s saying a lot.

I don’t like the prospect of either, but Trump is frightening

I probably won’t vote if it gets down to Trump versus Hillary.

 
Comment by Hi-Z
2016-01-23 08:01:28

The most fear or hatred of Trump that I have seen on this blog comes from you.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post