February 5, 2016

Bits Bucket for February 5, 2016

Post off-topic ideas, links, and Craigslist finds here. Please visit my Youtube channel which you can also find here:

http:tinyurl.com/http-hbb-com




RSS feed

336 Comments »

Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 02:48:09

Homeownership is a waste of time, time wasted doing things you don’t get paid for.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 07:29:13

Certainly takes time away from Tinder.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-05 08:39:37

If you are skinning or hiking every weekend you have no time to keep a home tidy and maintained. Better to rent small and live large.

 
Comment by rms
2016-02-05 09:10:07

Then Came Bronson?

 
Comment by Puggs
2016-02-05 14:12:22

^^ TRUE THAT ^^

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 17:31:36

Marketwatch dot com
Why one economist says buying a home is overrated
By Maria LaMagna
Published: Feb 6, 2016 6:21 p.m. ET
Renting isn’t such a bad idea
Now you can diversify.

Is buying a house instead of renting really the best financial decision?

It’s a question that’s frequently debated, with traditional thinking being that renting is akin to throwing money out the window. But there are some good reasons to believe that buying a home instead of renting isn’t as great of an investment as Americans once thought.

“Housing is overrated as a financial investment,” according to economist Alex Tabarrok, an economics professor at George Mason University and a research fellow at the university’s Mercatus Center, which conducts research on financial markets. He addressed the question of what economists think about buying compared to renting on Marginal Revolution, a blog he runs with fellow economist and George Mason professor Tyler Cowen.

“First, it’s not good to have a significant share of your wealth locked into a single asset,” he wrote. “Diversification is better and it’s easier to diversify with stocks. Second, unless you are renting the basement, houses don’t pay dividends. Stocks do. You can hope that your house will accumulate in value but don’t count on it. Indeed, you should expect that as an investment your house will appreciate less than does the stock market.”

Owning a home makes it harder for many people to change locations for new job opportunities, leading to homeowners holding onto homes even while prices fall, Tabarrok said.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 03:45:14

Is there any truth to the rumor that China has nearly burned through its cash reserves?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 03:53:04

Marketwatch dot com
SocGen claims China is only months away from burning through its currency reserves
By Sue Chang
Published: Feb 4, 2016 1:47 p.m. ET

Beijing may be forced to float the yuan within six months
ChinaFotoPress via Getty Images
China’s reserves may not be sufficient if its chickens come home to roost.

China is burning through its foreign-currency reserves at such a blistering pace that the country will run down its cushion in a few months, forcing the government to wave the white flag and float the yuan, says Société Générale global strategist Albert Edwards.

“The market remains content that massive firepower remains to support the renminbi. It does not,” Edwards, a perma-bear with a propensity for doom-and gloom-prognoses, said in a report published Thursday.

Société Générale, using the International Monetary Fund’s rule of thumb on reserve adequacy, estimates that China’s foreign-currency reserves are at 118% of the recommended level. But that cushion is likely to evaporate soon on a combination of capital flight and the continuing effort by financial authorities to stem a dramatic drop in the currency.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 07:16:15

It’s PBOC vs. the Yuan shorts (i.e. Soros & the Hedge Funds). Got popcorn?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/pboc-wins-battle-yuan-surges-highest-2016-currency-war-not-over

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 09:39:34

What will happen is what always happens after massive credit growth. Like night follows day.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:21:56

No, it’s different this time.

/sarc

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 03:49:09

Has the Trump bubble burst?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 03:51:13

Marketwatch dot com
Opinion: Is the ‘Trump bubble’ bursting in New Hampshire?
By Brett Arends
Published: Feb 5, 2016 5:28 a.m. ET

You might just make money betting against the supposed front-runner

Donald Trump is supposed to have an unbeatable lead in the Feb. 9 New Hampshire primary.

Phooey.

The polls were taken before he chickened out of the Iowa debate.

The polls were taken before he lost the Iowa caucus to Ted Cruz.

And the polls were taken before he started whining on Twitter that Cruz “stole” the caucus and should be disqualified.

New Hampshire is a famously fickle primary.

The voters pay attention to these things, they are unimpressed by front-runners, and they are willing to change their minds.

Hillary Clinton stunned the conventional wisdom in 2008 by snatching it at the last minute from a surging Barack Obama. John McCain trounced George W. Bush there in 2000. My brother, who used to be active in these things, reminded me this week that Walter Mondale had a supposedly “unbeatable” lead in New Hampshire back in 1984 and then Gary Hart came from nowhere and cleaned his clock. And, of course, it was New Hampshire that derailed past front-runners like Sen. Ed Muskie in 1972 and sitting president Lyndon Johnson in 1968.

The last 10 days have taken plenty of shine off the Donald Trump limousine and it’s going to be fascinating to see how this plays out in the Granite State. The Trump bubble may be bursting.

And there may be money in this as the bookmakers, so far, are still reading last week’s polls.

Comment by FrankBruno
 
 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-02-05 04:46:46

Iowa does that to candidates. Trumpertantrums. Brought to you by Howard Dean Moments, Inc!

 
Comment by SUGuy
2016-02-05 04:48:24

I will take Bernie over Hillary any day. I will also vote for Trump over any of the Neocon stooges.

Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 06:46:03

the Neocon stooges

This is an actual policy paper written in 1996 titled “Securing the Realm.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm

The “Realm?” Is this Game of Thrones here? No, it’s failed neocon ideology, brought to you by the 40% of the Republican primary electorate that believes that the Earth is 6,000 years old.

“Don’t vote for me if you’re tired of war” — Lindsey Graham

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 07:09:40

Testify. Bernie’s very mild attacks on Hllary for being a bought & paid for Wall Street stooge are getting under her skin. It’s about time ‘Muricans started looking at Wall Street payola as a liability in a candidate.

http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-wall-street-bernie-sanders-msnbc-debate-2016-2

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 07:40:05

Does anyone here actually believe Barney will be allowed to be the Dem candidate in any situation? I’d love to see it because it’s a guaranteed loss for the Libs, but that ain’t the way the world works.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 07:50:10

Did the Iowa primary outcome compel you to add yet another screen name?

There is help available for conditions such as yours if you seek it.

 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 08:17:00

Wishful thinking. Are you actually a “professor” of things other than failed predictions?

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-02-05 08:39:59

Ouchie!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 08:48:01

Your candidate suffered a crushing defeat in Iowa. Changing the subject won’t alter your bitter reality one iota.

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-02-05 09:39:03

LOLZ. Lost by 4 percentage points and that’s a “crushing defeat”. No wonder academia gets a bad name.

Rick Santorum “won” Iowa.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 09:49:12

“a crushing defeat in Iowa”

About that math. I read that Iowa is less than 1% of the total delegates. How is being one delegate behind, or 0.03% in the first contest of the series a crush?

I don’t know a lot about how a caucus works, but when the alsorans drop out, couldn’t Trump actually take the lead in Iowa delegates?

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-02-05 10:48:31

^That. Trump got 7 delegates to Cruz’ 8. Huge defeat.

 
Comment by MacBeth
2016-02-05 12:08:14

Bear’s ability to predict the future is about that of Rasmussen.

His bias is about that of MSNBC.

Most people are biased. I am, in some ways more than others.

Most adults recognize their own bias. Some refuse to, presumably because they believe bias to be the purview of lesser individuals. It’s the latter who cannot admit when they are wrong. They’ll repeatedly brow-beat others into the ground for their inaccuracies, but never their own.

Very childish.

 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 17:19:04

In California and claims “Professor”. I assumed it was just Internet nonsense but now I wonder if he is actually part of the utopian CA university crowd. Surrounded by such ultra-leftists, he’d consider himself far right.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:13:09

‘Lost by 4 percentage points and that’s a “crushing defeat”.’

Your math is off, because you are ignoring the Rubio effect of sucking votes away from The Donald and Cruz.

If you compute the percentage gap in outcomes based only on the votes for Trump and for Cruz, you will discover the gap was far wider than the misleading teevee news soundbite gap of 4 percentage points.

Go back to my posts from Iowa Caucus night for details.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:08:16

Does anyone here believe that Trump will be the Republican candidate in any situation?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 12:37:02

Here is a political prediction for you:

The rabble-rousing trio of Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz merely exist as foils to the eventual neocon showdown between Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio.

I’ll say “I told you so” if Clinton and Rubio are the eventual candidates.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 13:20:39

I’ll say “I told you so” if Clinton and Rubio are the eventual candidates.

I agree, PB.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 13:22:17

The Trolls for Trump who post here are either in on the Campaign to Elect Hillary Clinton, or they are dupes who help her unwittingly.

 
 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 13:00:33

+1

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 22:29:42

Marketwatch dot com
Donald Trump leads another poll, but he won’t be bragging about this one
By Shawn Langlois
Published: Jan 31, 2016 10:39 p.m. ET

The latest poll numbers are in, and Donald Trump, once again, is the clear leader. But don’t expect the “You’re fired” mogul to be tweeting out these results anytime soon.

According to Gallup, most of Americans don’t like him. In fact, three out of every five people polled view the Donald unfavorably. That’s the worst tally since Gallup began tracking the data back in 1992. George H.W. Bush and his 57% can rest easy, having given up that dubious distinction.

Interestingly enough, while Trump does lead in the good kinds of polls, too, his unfavorable rating is by far the highest among all his Republican competition.

“The bottom line is that Trump now has a higher unfavorable rating than any candidate at any time during all of these previous election cycles,” Gallup’s Frank Newport said. “And that conclusion takes into account the fact that unfavorable ratings tend to rise in the heat of a general election campaign as the barbs, negative ads and heightened partisanship are taken to their highest levels.”

Trumps numbers are pretty dismal, even relative to presidents at their worst levels outside of election years. For some perspective, Bill Clinton reached a high of 59% unfavorable rating in March 2001, shortly after he left office, and George W. Bush hit 66% during his lame-duck year in office.

There is, however, a silver lining for Trump. His potential rival for the White House, Hillary Clinton, really didn’t fare a whole lot better, with 52% feeling negative toward her.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:06:25

Is the dollar toast, given that liftoff is once more on indefinite hold?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:11:35

BloombergBusiness
With Liftoff Done, the Fed Revisits a $4.5 Trillion Quandary
Craig Torres
January 15, 2016 — 2:16 PM PST Updated on January 16, 2016 — 11:15 AM PST
Stanley Fischer, vice chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
Fischer wants to use balance sheet to lean on long-term rates
Market turmoil may push back rate rises, balance-sheet plans

Federal Reserve officials who spent months debating their first interest-rate increase in almost a decade are turning next to the thorny question of what to do with a balance sheet equivalent to the size of Japan’s economy.

A month after liftoff, turmoil in global financial markets has pushed out expectations for more rate hikes and raised concern about what tools are available to fight the next downturn. Vice Chairman Stanley Fischerhas suggested the $4.5 trillion balance sheet could be maintained as a way to hold down longer-term Treasury yields while the short-term policy rate was lifted.

Fischer’s idea — discussed in a Jan. 3 speech partly on strategies for pulling the short-term rate away from zero — was taken up in more practical terms by New York Fed President William C. Dudley Friday. Reinvesting maturing bonds and putting off a reduction in the balance sheet until the federal funds rate is raised somewhat higher “makes sense,” Dudley said.

“Having more ‘dry powder’ in the form of higher short-term interest rates seems more desirable than less dry powder and a smaller balance sheet,” he said.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen made similar comments in her Dec. 16 press conference, meaning the three most senior officials still view the central bank’s vast holdings of debt as an active policy tool rather than a relic of the financial crisis that needs to be shrunk as soon as possible.

Safer Choice

“Dudley’s view is if we get to choose our tool” to tighten policy, “then we are going to choose interest rates,” said Michael Hanson, senior economist at Bank of America Corp. That’s the safer choice, Hanson said, because officials are highly uncertain what shrinking the balance sheet would do to financial markets.

The preference to maintain trillions in bond holdings for months to come, however, isn’t likely to be popular with all Federal Open Market Committee participants. Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker favors an “expeditious” unwinding of the Fed’s bond holdings.

Comment by azdude
2016-02-05 05:31:48

the dollar rose on anticipation on a rate hike cycle that is basically impossible to implement.

It is basically all talk and hype to control the markets.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:03:02

+1. Yellen the Felon intends to print away all government and TBTF bank debts and liabilities. Precious metals and commodities represent a short on the dollar, since it’s clear the Fed intends to propell us down the road to Weimar 2.0.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 10:08:53

Did inflation come roaring out of nowhere in Weimar?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:21:12

“Did inflation come roaring out of nowhere in Weimar?”

My recollection is that it was a way for the Germans to get out from under unaffordable reparations imposed on them after WWI. Keynes predicted an economic catastrophe would result, but the politicians of the day ignored him.

 
 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 05:39:35

How much do taxpayers pay the Fed govs to ride round in suvs pontificating

Comment by Combotechie
2016-02-05 05:49:37

“How much do taxpayers pay the Fed govs to ride round in suvs pontificating”

My guess is … nothing. According to Wikipedia …

“The Federal Reserve is self-funded. The vast majority (90%+) of Fed revenues come from open market operations, specifically the interest on the portfolio of Treasury securities as well as “capital gains/losses” that may arise from the buying/selling of the securities and their derivatives as part of Open Market Operations. The balance of revenues come from sales of financial services (check and electronic payment processing) and discount window loans.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:04:26

The Federal Reserve is a private banking cartel. Read “The Creature from Jekyll Island” for the inside story on how the Oligopoly captured our banking system and uses it as its chief instrument of plunder against the 99%.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 08:50:52

They print their own paychecks and then some. No tax dollars are spent paying Fed governors.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 09:50:55

No tax dollars…

Do you not consider inflation a tax?

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:06:56

+1.

Their three-part mandate:

1) print as much as you want
2) spend as much as you want (on yourselves, of course)
3) return any funds left over to the US Treasury

Crazy, huh??!?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:26:40

“Do you not consider inflation a tax?”

Yes. Conversely deflation is a subsidy. I’m surprised central bankers don’t catch on that they could be stimulating spending by deflation that increases the purchasing power of the dollar.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 21:41:35

Does deflation stimulate spending?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 23:42:25

“Does deflation stimulate spending?”

Lower prices result in a greater quantity consumed. Any microeconomist learns this in a first college economics course.

Don’t macroeconomists have to study demand theory?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 12:47:46

Did consumer spending increase due to deflation during the Great Depression?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 13:18:31

The Great Depression constitutes a sample size of 1.

Certainly you wouldn’t base your inference on one data point!?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 13:29:41

I’m just trying to think of a period when deflation caused increased consumer spending.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-06 14:14:49

Lower prices result in a greater quantity consumed. Any microeconomist learns this in a first college economics course.

When that is taught, it’s usually the decline in price of a specific product, not the prices of many products acroos the whole economy. If Oddfellow has cited one data point, he’s winning the argument with you. The score is 1 to 0.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 15:14:08

“I’m just trying to think of a period when deflation caused increased consumer spending.”

Deflation would naturally result in a higher level of consumption, UNLESS households and businesses are in debt.

Households and businesses which buried themselves in debt during a deflationary period have chosen a path of financial ruin for themselves.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 16:19:48

But can you think of a time when it happened?

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 17:44:17

It’s happening currently given the crushing mortgage debt.

Remember…. Households and businesses which buried themselves in debt during a deflationary period have chosen a path of financial ruin for themselves.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 17:47:33

I can tthink of several times when deflationary pressure stimulated consumption:

- Back in 2008, when panic was in the air and financial markets were seizing up, my wife and I helped out a local car dealer our by taking a brand new automobile off his lot in exchange for cash payment.

- Shortly after, my first cousin drove up in a late model Lexis that he bought after the owner defaulted on the loan.

- In early 2012 we bought another new car for cash.

There you go: Three data points.

In all three cases, cash payments made during a time of deflationary pressure paid for a car purchase which would most likely not have occurred if inflation already had driven prices out of the reach of our budget limits.

Of course, people who buy houses they cannot afford with dumb borrowed money don’t tend to have cash savings available to fund car purchases.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 18:45:43

Of course, people who buy houses they cannot afford with dumb borrowed money don’t tend to have cash savings available to fund car purchases.

Yeah, I think that’s why deflationary times reduce overall consumer spending.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 19:03:20

Not typically.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 19:09:54

I personally don’t understand the rationale for owning a home financed with a fixed-rate mortgage during a deflationary period when falling prices are likely to put you permanently underwater on the most expensive asset in your household wealth portfolio. I guess that’s why I don’t own a house.

Anyone who thinks they understand the wisdom of home ownership during a period of deflation, please share your insight!

 
Comment by rms
2016-02-06 23:26:24

“Anyone who thinks they understand the wisdom of home ownership during a period of deflation, please share your insight!”

I bought my 3br/2ba rancher at the bottom of the 2002/2003 dip, and I own it outright. Yeah… I really wish I lived further south, but I have really enjoyed being debt-free these past four years. Prudence has paid-off now as I have a daughter in college, and I am paying the freight up front; no student debt. My son is next in the queue. There’s no Goon Thoreau mountain treks in my immediate future.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-07 00:25:50

“I bought my 3br/2ba rancher at the bottom of the 2002/2003 dip,…”

My question was not addressed to folks who buy low and sell high. I’m more interested to hear from those who bought between 2005-2007, or 2013-2015.

 
Comment by rms
2016-02-07 11:17:07

“My question was not addressed to folks who buy low and sell high.”

Yeah, I knew that you were really targeting those making fixed or laddered payments on a deflating and depreciating shack. Savvy Californians would rather pay teaser payments for several years if it were cheaper than renting and then shamelessly “walk-away” when renting becomes cheaper. There’s really no intention of ever paying for the place.

 
 
 
Comment by rj chicago
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:27:42

It’s only a matter of time before savers get financially waterboarded with negative returns on their savings.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:16:03

Top News
Mon Jan 18, 2016 | 2:00 AM EST
RPT-Rate rise calls evaporate as markets plunge, murmurs of Fed reversal

* 10-year Treasury yield below 2 pct

* Global economy, markets fragile

* Recent history shows policy can be reversed

By Jamie McGeever

LONDON, Jan 15 (Reuters) - The worst ever start to a year for financial markets has left traders and economists rethinking the global monetary policy outlook, with some predicting the Federal Reserve will quickly reverse last month’s historic rate rise.

The Fed lifted U.S. interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade on Dec. 16, signalling its faith that the economy had finally put the 2007-08 financial crisis behind it.

Ferocious volatility fuelled by worries about China’s currency and stock markets has since wiped trillions of dollars off world stocks, however, while a slowing China has exacerbated worries about the robustness of U.S. economic growth.

Interest rate futures traders are already paring back their expectations of when the Fed might tighten again while several big banks this week dovishly revised their 2016 outlooks for the Bank of England, European Central Bank and Bank of Canada.

“You shouldn’t underestimate that a change in where the market sees rates going could happen pretty quickly. Another month of what we’ve seen this year, and we could be there,” said Steve Barrow, head of G10 strategy at Standard Bank in London.

The Fed made clear when announcing “liftoff” that it broadly anticipated four further 25 basis point increases this year, a view echoed by Fed officials in recent speeches.

The latest Reuters poll of 120 economists points to the federal funds rate, currently 0.25-0.50 percent, reaching 1.00- 1.25 percent by the end of the year and rising more in 2017.

But U.S. interest rate futures markets show barely two rate hikes priced in for this year, while the 10-year Treasury yield has slumped below 2 percent. It was 2.30 percent when the Fed raised rates last month.

The timing of any volte face from the Fed isn’t yet reflected in market pricing, and examples from Sweden, Australia and the euro zone — where central banks were forced to reverse rate hike cycles — show it may not be until the last minute.

All those central banks raised interest rates after the 2008 crisis, but now have them at historic lows — below zero in the case of Sweden.

“The markets don’t believe the Fed. I said at the time of the December raise it was a mistake and gave a 50/50 chance that the next move would be a cut,” said David Blanchflower, professor of economics at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire and a former Bank of England policymaker.

“September may be the meeting when we see a cut, but maybe sooner if markets continue to collapse.”

Some $5.7 trillion has been wiped off the value of world stocks in the first nine days of the year, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

UNDER PRESSURE

Joe Lavorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank in New York, says there have been 12 tightening cycles over the past 60 years, averaging 24 months during which the fed funds rate has risen 531 basis points.

But economies worldwide are still scarred by the financial crisis, which prompted the Fed to expand its balance sheet by $4 trillion and hold rates at zero for almost seven years.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:33:36

“The Fed lifted U.S. interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade on Dec. 16, signalling its faith that the economy had finally put the 2007-08 financial crisis behind it.

Ferocious volatility fuelled by worries about China’s currency and stock markets has since wiped trillions of dollars off world stocks, however, while a slowing China has exacerbated worries about the robustness of U.S. economic growth.”

The Fed’s problem is that Wall Street has a big bazooka aimed their direction which it will fire off the moment it is convinced that liftoff is really here.

Time will tell how well the Fed can stick to plans under a hail of bazooka fire.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:35:01

That said, what is to stop the Fed from simply growing their $4+ trillion balance sheet forever? Is the sun going to stop rising in the east if the Fed continues with its policy of balance sheet expansion?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 11:32:25

That said, what is to stop the Fed from simply growing their $4+ trillion balance sheet forever?

The only thing that acts as a bound on their ability to grow the balance sheet: politics. If the general perception becomes that they have screwed up the economy in an unforgivable way, then Congress could potentially clip their wings. Fat chance, that, given that the global banking cartel owns our government.

In other words, they could still get away with a whole lot of balance sheet expansion, IMO—and the associated economic damage.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:20:48

Top News
Wed Feb 3, 2016 | 4:37 PM EST
Conservative investors get welcome boost from U.S. Treasury yields
By Trevor Hunnicutt

NEW YORK Feb 3 (Reuters) - The strong dollar, weak oil markets, a corporate-bond sell-off and stalling global economy are a toxic mess for most U.S. investors.

But these trends are delivering a welcome boost to the portfolios of conservative investors hunkered down in investments sensitive to U.S. Treasury yields.

Such investors have weathered years of predictions that the three-decade-long bull market in bonds was over, and that their positions were doomed should tighter monetary policy from the U.S. Federal Reserve lift rates.

The opposite has happened. Funds such as the $193 million Touchstone Total Return Bond, with stronger weighting to rate-sensitive U.S. agency debt and less exposure to corporate bonds, are winning.

“There are some structural forces out there that are keeping interest rates down and people are finally coming to realize it,” said Crit Thomas, a senior strategist for Touchstone Investments. The fund’s institutional shares returned 1.56 percent this year through Tuesday, according to Morningstar Inc, ahead of 90 percent of its competitors.

“It’s just taken a long time to get there,” Thomas said.

Yields on benchmark 10-year Treasury debt sank from nearly 2.28 percent at the year’s close to 1.88 on Wednesday afternoon, a 17 percent slide. Bond yields move inversely to their prices.

Comment by cactus
2016-02-05 10:42:22

“There are some structural forces out there that are keeping interest rates down and people are finally coming to realize it,”

not good for pension funds

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:37:29

Not good for pensioners relying on returns on savings (like my parents!). Unless they have a defined benefit pension (like my parents have) whose value erodes with inflation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:26:55

Morgan Stanley sees big plunge in Treasury yields
Jeff Cox
Mon, 25 Jan ‘16 | 2:25 PM ETCNBC.com
‘Boring, but beautiful’ stock picks

If early returns hold, 2016 is shaping up as another year where the bond market’s demise has been greatly exaggerated.

Numerous forecasts around Wall Street warned investors away from fixed income, particularly longer duration U.S. government issues. The thinking was that the Fed’s rate-hiking trajectory would push up Treasury yields, eroding prices and sending investors to bond-like equities.

That theory has pretty much blown up in January.

Wobbly economic growth coupled with slumping oil prices and contagion fears from a hard landing in China substantially lowered expectations for rate hikes. With stock market indexes tumbling, investors have flocked to bonds as a safe haven. Funds that track long-dated Treasurys have crushed the stock market and lured in strong investor cash flows.

While many of their colleagues on the Street warned investors to avoid long-dated bonds, Morgan Stanley strategists believe government fixed income both in the U.S. and a number of other countries represent great value.

Comment by Combotechie
2016-02-05 05:43:20

“Morgan Stanley sees big plunge in Treasury yields”

The thirty-year Treasury bond one-year chart …

http://finviz.com/futures_charts.ashx?t=ZB&p=d1

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 09:36:10

Up from 144 last July to 162 in February. If we agree this is roughly a half year period, the annualized rate of capital gains was about

((162/144)^2-1)*100% = 26.6%.

The returns are even higher if you add in yield income.

Too bad the proles don’t understand bonds, as they could be making some serious bank instead of getting slaughtered in the stock market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:12:08

Too bad the proles don’t understand bonds, as they could be making some serious bank instead of getting slaughtered in the stock market.

Until they guess wrong about the direction of interest rates—and then get slaughtered in the bond market.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:38:56

“Until they guess wrong about the direction of interest rates—”

I fully expect them to pile into bonds at the moment just before rates finally resume their march upwards to normalcy. It’s just the way of these matters…

 
 
Comment by cactus
2016-02-05 10:44:18

kinda explains why AEP keeps going up utilities are like BOND plays

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-02-05 05:52:25

we need more stimulus!

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 12:28:11

I’m expecting Yellen the Felon to announce NIRP in March, to be followed in short order by QE4. That might give a residual dead-cat bounce to our Ponzi markets, but it will be weak and short-lived. After that, the bottom drops out as the long-deferred financial reckoning day finally shows up in all its fury.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 21:39:56

It seems like they are truly at risk this time around of running out of ammunition.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 11:34:17

running out of ammunition.

How so? The limits on QE4 are only the political ones.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:50:02

“The limits on QE4 are only the political ones.”

Not so. Check out what happened to the currencies of countries like Zimbabwe for evidence to the contrary.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 13:19:39

Ok, there is certainly existence-proofs of countries that printed too much. Zimbabwe is hardly a good example, though, as it was far from being the world reserve currency at the time.

How large do you think the balance sheet could get before a crisis of confidence would actually ensue?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 13:20:44

“How large do you think the balance sheet could get before a crisis of confidence would actually ensue?”

It’s already large enough.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2016-02-05 05:39:23

“Is the dollar toast, given that liftoff is once more on indefinite hold?”

The USD one-year chart …

http://finviz.com/futures_charts.ashx?p=d1&t=DX

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 07:52:14

The effects of liftoff postponement are visible at the right end of the figure.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 00:07:19

ft dot com
Last updated: February 5, 2016 1:39 pm
Government bond yields send recession signal
Elaine Moore in London, Robin Wigglesworth in New York and Leo Lewis in Tokyo
Universe of negative yielding debt grows beyond $5tn as central banks indicate further easing

If major government bond markets are right, the global economy is sliding towards recession and central bank easing policies will pull borrowing rates deeper into negative territory.

In Germany, the average yield on all government debt is now negative, while Japan is on course to become the first major bond market with a 10 year bond that yields nothing. In Europe and Japan, government bonds worth nearly $6tn now trade at such highs that buyers will make a loss if they hold the paper to maturity.

Across the Atlantic, talk of recession risk has grown louder in recent weeks among investors, with the 10-year Treasury yield, touching a nine-month low of 1.80 per cent this week.

“At these levels the bond market is forecasting recession,” says Marcus Brookes, a fund manager at Schroders. “The Janet and John way to explain it is that for the next 10 years you have to think inflation will be much, much lower than 2 per cent to want to buy these bonds. Otherwise you’d be locking in a loss.”

Many investors began 2016, expecting firmer growth, led by the US and from consumer spending buoyed by cheap energy. In a few weeks, the outlook has deteriorated. Global equity and corporate bond markets have been hit, with investors heading for the exit, alarmed by China’s slowdown dragging on global trade.

At such moments, demand for government debt that pays out a fixed income accelerates but has the current rally in sovereign bond prices already run too far?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 00:13:41

Markets | Fri Feb 5, 2016 9:26am EST
Yield curve moves flash global recession warning signs
LONDON | By Jamie McGeever

If the bond market is to be believed, the world is heading for recession.

The turmoil sweeping through financial markets this year, principally driven by the plunge in oil prices and fears over China’s economy, has lowered government bond yields and flattened yield curves across the developed world.

The question is whether the “yield curve” retains its historical predictive power of indicating slowing growth or even recession in a world of zero - even negative - interest rates, negative yields and trillions of dollars of central bank stimulus coursing through the financial system, if not the real economy.

Longer-dated yields on a country’s bonds should normally be higher than short-dated ones because investors demand a higher rate of compensation for the increased credit and inflation risks they assume in lending over a longer timeframe.

This is a “positive” yield curve, “steepening” from left to right. But curves are flattening - short-term yields are anchored by expectations policy rates are going nowhere fast and falling growth and inflation expectations are depressing longer-term yields.

“It’s a little more complicated than it used to be. The shape of the yield curve today is very much a function of global central bank activity – negative rates and quantitative easing. This changes the mechanics of the yield curve with respect to pure growth and inflation signals,” said Lena Komileva, managing director at G+ Economics in London.

“But it does suggest a capitulation in investor confidence in the ability of central banks to reflate global growth or prevent another downturn. And that’s not a good confidence signal,” she said.

The U.S. two-year/10-year yield curve, the difference between two-year and 10-year borrowing costs, this week fell to 110 basis points, the flattest in eight years.

The 10-year yield fell below 1.90 percent and is down more than 40 basis points since the Federal Reserve’s historic interest rates “liftoff” in December.

A flattening yield curve has in the past been a reasonably accurate portent of slowing growth and an inverted curve, when the long-dated yield falls below the short-dated yield, an even more accurate guide to looming recession.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 09:33:13

“It’s a little more complicated than it used to be. The shape of the yield curve today is very much a function of global central bank activity – negative rates and quantitative easing. This changes the mechanics of the yield curve with respect to pure growth and inflation signals,”

Bingo! Somebody is actually paying attention to the effects of massive, unprecedented central-bank driven market distortion.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 09:36:05

“The U.S. two-year/10-year yield curve, the difference between two-year and 10-year borrowing costs, this week fell to 110 basis points, the flattest in eight years.”

Since the highly-distorted yield curve itself is no longer a reliable indicator, the level and rate of change in the spread across different maturities is the right place to look for evidence of investor expectations.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 11:44:36

the level and rate of change in the spread across different maturities is the right place to look

Couldn’t those spreads also be merely false signals caused by the Fed open-market operations?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:52:14

Yes, they could be.

However, my point is that one should not bother looking for a yield curve inversion as a recession indicator during a period when the short end of the curve is tethered to the mat. It is technically infeasible for the curve to invert under the constraint of ZIRP.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 14:26:17

Yep, I totally agree—unless for some reason, the Fed wants to allow such a signal to occur, and decides to start going all of their QE at the long end of the curve.

At the moment, it signals whatever they want to allow it to signal.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 04:35:08

Business
Fund houses lose money in billions due to slump in stock markets
5 Feb, 2016, 0400 hrs IST, Bloomberg
Firms get squeezed by sovereign wealth funds in need of cash after oil plunged
By Charles Steines

Money managers are having trouble hanging on to money. Franklin Resources said on Wednesday that investors withdrew $20.6 billion in the fourth quarter, the latest asset manager to highlight the issue of redemptions. Affiliated Mangers Group said on Tuesday that it had outflows of $6.8 billion, while Waddell & Reed saw $5 billion in withdrawals, contributing to the biggest drop in its stock since the financial crisis of 2008.

Money managers are hurt by slumping stock markets worldwide, which have prompted investors to dump anything perceived as risky. The firms are getting squeezed by sovereign wealth funds in need of cash after oil plunged, and the shift by investors from active funds to cheaper ones. The preference for passive products and ETFs has created winners.

 
Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 05:03:50

Not all Drudge Report links are created equal.

You may get a whiff of libertarianism, but like a fart in the wind it is soon eclipsed by the rotting corpse aroma of neocon ideology. As Marco Rubio’s star rises in the media, so does the scripting of neocon narratives. Today’s include:

ISIS in France
ISIS in Germany
ISIS in Iraq
ISIS in Syria

No smaller government or less regulations or lower taxes happening here.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 06:29:59

You may get a whiff of libertarianism, but like a fart in the wind it is soon eclipsed by the rotting corpse aroma of neocon ideology.

That pretty much describes the GOP, doesn’t it? How long can libertarians stay in the neocon war party? What are they even doing there? Are they really libertarians?

There is nothing libertarian about the GOP.

Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 07:06:10

An ideology as equally bankrupt as cultural relativism and victim identity politics. I’d like to see this country dissolve into a three-way war between TradCon/Neocons, progressive/SJWs, and jihadists.

“This sucker could go down” — George W. Bush

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 07:14:54

Are the jihadists the libertarians?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 07:34:22

Better, you are your own narrative. But you don’t get to script mine.

I’ll be dead in a few decades, and will leave nothing behind but a well liked but soon to be forgotten Instagram account.

Keep pretending this country has a future if it makes you feel better.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 08:11:10

But you don’t get to script mine.

I’m just trying to figure out who the jihadists are, and where the libertarians fit in. Your script is inscrutable.

 
 
 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-05 07:26:59

I think I was registered a Republican for two years out of the last 37. Lots of libertarians left after the 2012 scam against Ron Paul by his own party. The big party back room dealers don’t allow libertarians any chance.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 07:52:35

He just never could get the votes to make him a contender in his own party. Well he’s hawking gold now so you can help him out by buying some.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by clark
2016-02-05 08:16:38

That’s kind of funny, FrankBruno, “He just never could get the votes to make him a contender in his own party.”
The local GOP party boss makes the rules and makes it up as they go along. If the local party boss didn’t want to give the votes to R.P., no matter what the delegates wanted or if it went against established party rules, the boss decided where the votes go. Who tells the local party boss what to do? It certainly isn’t the delegates or the voters. What’s that tell you about who is allowed to, “get the votes”?

 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 08:21:02

It’s all well documented, he didn’t get near enough votes. He was 3rd in Iowa in 2012, always well behind the real contenders. A list of his 2012 primary finishes is easily found by looking at Wikipedia. It’s fair to say he had some support for some delegates from various 2nd 3rd or 4th place finishes, but not close to enough to be a contender.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:04:43

Ron Paul was validation of the fact that 95% of the electorate are stupid. He alone stood up to the Wall Street-Federal Reserve Looting Syndicate, and spoke truth to power. The thinking 5% ardently supported him. However, the intelligent minority could not overcome that fact that 95% of our fellow ‘Muricans were so zombified and slavishly devoted to tossing Wall Street’s salad by voting for its annointed water carriers, Obama, McCain, and Romney.

So here we are. When our financial house of cards finally collapses under the weight of its own fraud and make-believe valuations, there will be very few innocent victims.

 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 09:56:18

LP AFP and local TP for me

also the fcta.org
we are in enemy territory as all here in DC are governmentarains

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 05:22:12

Conflicting formats of Sky Wizardry, as reported by your betters.

We’re Tracking Islamophobic Incidents Across The U.S., Because The Only Way To Stop Hate Is To Confront It:

http://testkitchen.huffingtonpost.com/islamophobia/

The 2014 Super Bowl Coke commercial didn’t include this example of cultural relativism, they need to update that for 2016, because racism.

‘Multicultural Toilets’ For ‘Global Defecation’ Seek To Stop Migrants Pooping On The Floor:

“Multiple reports have emerged of recent arrivals finding themselves utterly “mystified” by Western loos. Some have resorted to doing their business on the floor or outdoors, others have used showers, and many migrants will have never seen toilet paper before.

The issue caused some serious confusion last year, with one small German village being accused of racism after issuing leaflets politely asking migrants to use to the correct facilities.

With 1.5 million migrants from the Middle East and North Africa arriving in the country last year, solving the problem without facing such accusations of bigotry presents a sizeable business opportunity.

Enter the Global Fliegenschmidt toilet manufacturers based in Coswig, Saxony-Anhalt, who have announced their plans to develop a mobile “multicultural toilet” complete with a squatting platform and water hose for migrant friendly sanitation.

The design was shown to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung national newspaper, who gave a gloriously politically correct write up of the new product, branding it, “Universally applicable: the refugee toilet is ideal for the globalised defecation.”

“Because everyone knows: Different cultures also mean different scale latrines. For Muslims, it is important that when using a toilet, one’s back does not face Mecca.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/04/germany-develops-multicultural-toilets-to-stop-migrants-defecating-on-floor/

P.S. Aisha was nine years old when 53 year old Muhammed consummated their marriage, but that’s another narrative for another day, your betters are still scripting that one…

Comment by palmetto
2016-02-05 07:05:24

“Islam has always been a part of America.”

“Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia”

Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 07:25:09

The reason they’re called Betters is because they’re better than you.

Female circumcision? Better.
Honor killings? Better.
Hajh stampede? Better.
Afghani boy rape? Better.
6 year old brides? Better.
Global jihad? Better.
Pooping away from Mecca? Better.

My neocon wants to bomb the sh*t out of them. My SJW wants to bring millions of them here. But I’d rather not engage with any of them, personally or militarily.

What does the Southern Poverty Law Center employee handbook instruct as a response to the content of the Breitbart article?

Comment by In Colorado
2016-02-05 08:02:58

My neocon wants to bomb the sh*t out of them. My SJW wants to bring millions of them here

Our foreign policy in a nutshell: Invade the world, invite the world.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:06:36

The permanent warfare-welfare-surveillance state, ratified by 95% of the electorate with their votes for the neocon, corporate statist, crony capitalist status quo.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2016-02-05 08:33:17

“But I’d rather not engage with any of them, personally or militarily.”

My sentiments exactly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-02-05 15:17:14

+another

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 09:42:04

My SJW wants to bring millions of them here. But I’d rather not engage with any of them, personally or militarily.

You appear to derive a lot of satisfaction from sharing these stories about events in Germany. Wouldn’t it be more exciting if these things were happening in the USA. As you state constantly, we’ll all be dead in a few years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 07:18:16

“the refugee toilet is ideal for the globalised defecation.”

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:19:09

globalised defecation

Isn’t that what the oligarchs are doing all over the 99.9%?

 
 
 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 06:08:07

Happy Friday :mrgreen:

Keeeeeeeeyrank The Texas Tornado to 12, sit back and count your pile o’ cash.

https://youtu.be/UL9z2xnwiDk

This ones for Az_Donk

https://youtu.be/-FIMvSp01C8

 
Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-02-05 06:26:05

For any of you pukes who care to rise up out of your own personal morass of ignorance and “educated” conditioning you might want to ponder these words of Edward Bernays:

“In Propaganda (1928), Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of democracy:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 06:37:30

we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

It is they who know…The Secret!

 
Comment by clark
2016-02-05 08:29:37

Thank You for that public service announcement, Mr. Banker. It has an Outer Limits quality to it. The Power Elite, It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind. It’s proving to be quite impossible to disconnect that wire from the minds of others. It’s like people are immune or allergic to reason, logic and facts. That’s, DreamTime, the stuff which makes bubbles resilient and grow. I should try harder to take the advise of others and just, ‘Tend Your Own Garden’. That’s all there is.

Comment by Mr. Banker
2016-02-05 09:15:24

It used to be that wealth was forcibly confiscated via coercion, now wealth is voluntarily contributed via persuasion.

Progress!

The Masses: Dumb ‘em down, and profit.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:10:46

I must say, Mr. Banker, after the difficulties I’ve encountered training my less-than-intelligent dog, I can appreciate how you banksters and your captured media have dumbed down 95% of the populace to well below the level of my dog, then trained them to bend over on command every election day, as if in response to a whistle pitch that only the brain dead can hear. “That’s a good boy!” And you don’t even have to give them a treat. That, Mr. Banker, is your defining accomplishment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 09:33:30

I should try harder to take the advise of others and just, ‘Tend Your Own Garden’. That’s all there is.

That’s what the elites want. Just stay home. Don’t even talk to your neighbors. Let Mr. Banker and his friends run the world.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:08:13

95% of ‘Muricans find ignorance a rather blissful state, and shun knowledge and wisdom like the plague.

Comment by Combotechie
2016-02-05 11:04:34

“Happy is the man who finds wisdom, and the man who gains understanding; for her proceeds are better than the profits of silver, and her gain than fine gold.” - Proverbs 3: 13-14.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:12:17

“For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.”

King James Version (KJV)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:13:36

Ecclesiastes 1:18

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 05:32:25

Interesting coincidence how Bernays published his book just before the rise of Hitler.

I have a vague recollection that he was Sigmund Freud’s close relative…

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 09:38:25

Special Series1905: Science’s Miracle Year
Freud’s Nephew and the Origins of Public Relations
April 22, 2005
12:00 AM ET
Alix Spiegel - Square

Public relations pioneer Edward Bernays, shown (L to R) from the late 1920s to early ’30s, the mid- to late ’40s and 1990.
The Museum of Public Relations

Years ago, Americans grabbed toast and coffee for breakfast. Public-relations pioneer Edward Bernays changed that.

Bernays used his Uncle Sigmund Freud’s ideas to help convince the public, among other things, that bacon and eggs was the true all-American breakfast.

He took Freud’s complex ideas on people’s unconscious, psychological motivations and applied them to the new field of public relations.

 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 06:53:23

Bernie Sanders: let’s turn the Post Office into a bank

October 20, 2015 by Taylor Millard

Yeah, I think that’s a great idea. In fact, I just spoke to a postal union this morning. I want to see our post office be reinvigorated. And one of the ways that I think we can help not only the U.S. Postal Service, but help a lot of low-income people—if you are a low-income person, it is, depending upon where you live, very difficult to find normal banking. Banks don’t want you. And what people are forced to do is go to payday lenders who charge outrageously high interest rates. You go to check-cashing places, which rip you off. And, yes, I think that the postal service, in fact, can play an important role in providing modest types of banking service to folks who need it.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 07:12:57

lol@BarneySanders

Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 07:20:56

Maybe we could also turn Public Libraries into Hedge Funds.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:10:06

Public libraries are already turning into places where deadbeat moms dump their kids to run wild, and where the homeless get out of the cold. God knows how few ‘Muricans actually read books any more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 07:18:43

people are forced to do is go to payday lenders who charge outrageously high interest rates. You go to check-cashing places, which rip you off.

But ripping off poor people is the American Way. This guy is a commie, he wants to help the poor.

Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 07:43:37

“he wants to help the poor.”

“His case is weak”

Money pit: The USPS has lost more than $46 billion since 2007

May 28, 2015 by Matt Vespa

The U.S. Postal Service has lost billions since 2007, but the move that could put it on the path towards solvency is to expand its operations into the financial sector. Oh, those aren’t my words; it’s the words of the Inspector General and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who thinks giving the money-losing USPS the ability to hold bank accounts, is a way to save it from its financial pickle. This expansion is just a bad idea– no wonder why Citizens Against Government Waste called the proposal “ludicrous” (via Citizens Against Government Waste):

Having lost more than $46 billion since 2007, The United States Postal Service (USPS) is having a very public flirtation with expanding its service footprint to include banking. Oddly, one of the prime cheerleaders in this effort is the Postal Service’s Inspector General (IG) David Williams. Typically, IG’s are tasked with keeping a watchful and skeptical eye on their agencies, identifying and routing out waste, fraud, abuse, and bad management practices. However, Williams frequently acts as USPS’s chief advocate on matters of expansion. Last year, his office released a white paper alleging that the USPS possesses the ability to expand into the financial services sector. On May 22, 2015 another white paper was published by the IG urging the same thing.

Ostensibly, this expansion would be designed to help the “68 million undeserved Americans who either do not have a bank account or rely on expensive services like payday lending and check cashing.” His case is weak. For example, there are nearly 100,000 bank branches and more than 400,000 ATMs compared to just 31,000 post offices. Add to that, national retailers like Walmart, Walgreens, Safeway, and others provide financial services nationwide on every street corner. Finally, the onset of the digital age has given way to banking services on smart phones that don’t require customers to travel to a bank at all.

A fellow proponent of expansion, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), claimed that allowing the USPS to get into banking would help it “shore up its own financial footing.” On this point, Warren and her allies reveal their warped economic logic. The USPS is clearly in financial peril. On top of its staggering financial losses, the USPS has seen more than a quarter of its total mail volume evaporate between 2007 and 2013. This can be mostly attributed to the rapid and irreversible decline in paper mail, the demise of the brick and mortar business model, and the rise of the digital era. But, the USPS, which itself is burdened by an onerous network of bricks and mortar facilities and exorbitant labor costs, has failed to rationalize and right size to deal with its changing service base. The contention that it should expand, even as the agency careens headlong toward financial calamity, is counterintuitive and fiscally ludicrous.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 08:15:07

For example, there are nearly 100,000 bank branches and more than 400,000 ATMs compared to just 31,000 post offices. Add to that, national retailers like Walmart, Walgreens, Safeway, and others provide financial services nationwide on every street corner

Then why are there all those check cashing places in poor neighborhoods?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 09:05:10

“Then why are there all those check cashing places in poor neighborhoods?”

You mean all the payday loan places?

I will let you figure it out.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 09:28:43

Have you figured out why there are so many check cashing places if the poor are so well-supplied with good banking options?

 
Comment by CHE
2016-02-05 14:45:04

Clearly they weren’t responsible with their money, otherwise they would be able to use regular banking services.

I had a savings account with my parent’s credit union when I was a kid with only a few hundred bucks. Then I opened up a checking and savings account at the Wells Fargo at the Supermarket where I worked when I was 16 with under $1000 and all it required was direct deposit of my paycheck.

Shortly thereafter, I was issued a low credit limit credit card. I used it for some small purchases and paid it off every month.

Poor people who stay poor for any length of time remain that way because they don’t manage their money properly. How is the government providing “banking services” to the most irresponsible money handlers going to turn out well?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:08:31

Poor people who stay poor for any length of time remain that way because they don’t manage their money properly.

Another way of stating that is that the only thing that poor people have to do to get out of poverty is manage their money well. That doesn’t sound plausible.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:49:47

How is the government providing “banking services” to the most irresponsible money handlers going to turn out well?

It’s going to turn out very well for the well-connected Wall Street firms who land the fat contracts to “administer” these entitlement programs.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 21:13:32

How is the government providing “banking services” to the most irresponsible money handlers going to turn out well?

By cashing their checks for far less than the check cashing businesses, and offering basic accounts without minimum balances and tons of penalties and surcharges.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Combotechie
2016-02-05 07:25:43

This idea isn’t new. When I was kid (in the Fifties) there was such a thing as “postal savings” and I knew some people who had their savings deposited there - deposited there in the post office. Apparently there still exists this postal savings idea …

Wiki:

“Many nations’ post offices operated or continue to operate postal savings systems to provide depositors who do not have access to banks a safe, convenient method to save money and to promote saving among the poor.”

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 10:01:04

Exactly. It’s not at all a new or outlandish idea.

 
 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 08:03:58

Is it really “very difficult”? There is a Bank of America about a mile from Florence and Normandie where Reginald Denny was dragged from his truck, beaten, hit in the head with a brick and almost killed.

 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 08:10:14

and he’s neck n neck w the other socialist that most here will vote for
webb vs Rand may have been educational

 
Comment by Ethan in Northern VA
2016-02-05 09:50:44

Oh man my experience with the postal service has mostly been laughably bad?

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2016-02-05 14:35:52

Yeah, because we don’t have enough banks.

I walked 5 minutes to grab my lunch, and walked past 2 banks. If I changed my vector to a different lunch spot, I would have walked past a different 2 banks plus a credit union.

How about closing up smaller traditional post offices, and opening more smaller locations within grocery stores? Maybe instead of losing money, the USPS can start making it?

What they really need to do is allow more creative things in banking like “prize-linked” savings accounts.

People don’t need access to more banks, they need to save more money in the banks we have.

Rather than entice people to save money by offering them $0.10 of interest on $100 in savings for a year, they pool all the dimes, and give the person who has that same $100 a 1 in a 10,000 chance at hitting a $1,000 jackpot.

It has proven to increase the number of people who save money.

 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-02-05 15:14:03

“The business model of Wall Street is fraud.” -Bernie Sanders, 2/4/2016 (who lives rent free simultaneously in both phony and HA’s heads, surprisingly, since he won’t even be the Dem primary winner)

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 07:20:10

Payrolls in U.S. Climb as Jobless Rate Declines, Wages Rise

Job growth settled into a more sustainable pace in January and the unemployment rate dropped to an almost eight-year low of 4.9 percent, signs of a resilient labor market that’s causing wage growth to stir.

The 151,000 advance in payrolls, while less than forecast, largely reflected payback for a seasonal hiring pickup in the final two months of 2015, Labor Department figures showed Friday. The jobless rate fell to the lowest level since February 2008. Hourly earnings rose more than estimated after climbing in the year to December by the most since July 2009.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-05/payrolls-in-u-s-rose-151-000-in-january-jobless-rate-at-4-9

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 07:24:50

Are you sure?

“The country’s labor force participation rate – which measures the share of Americans at least 16 years old who are either employed or actively looking for work – dipped last month to a 38-year low”

http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 07:44:57

That graph disagrees with your description of it. I’ve explained to you many times why that labor force participation rate thing is irrelevant.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 08:03:55

It’s BLS’s description of it my friend. Record high unemployment. Get over it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 09:20:14

It must be an old description, then. And you must still not know what the participation rate is.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 09:53:35

Nope. It’s right on bls’s site. Sorry.

 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:38:44

I’ve explained to you many times why that labor force participation rate thing is irrelevant.

It’s definitely not “irrelevant”. Yes, it can change significantly based on underlying societal changes (e.g. look at how it changed during the period when women entered the workforce en masse). But societal changes do not adequately explain how it has cratered since 2009.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 11:20:34

Maybe irrelevant was too strong. There are two things about that rate that you need to consider. First, it includes people who are employed as well as those who are looking for work. In other words, a person who has no job is considered to be participating in the labor force if he is looking for work. Only if he gives up looking for work is he considered to be no longer part of the labor force. So if five million currently employed Americans were to lose their jobs this month, but continue to look for work, it would have no effect on the participation rate.

The other issue with that statistic is that includes everyone over the age of 16. Thus, my parents, who are in their mid-seventies, have contributed to the decline in the rate. They worked years ago, but they no longer have jobs and they’re not looking for work.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 12:50:25

Your parents are seeking work at that age? Sounds like they got a problem.

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2016-02-05 14:40:19

More relevant is the labor participation rate by age cohort…it strips out the effect of changing demographics on the headline number.

All else equal, if we have a higher proportion of the population that is over 70 years old, we will have a lower percentage of the population over 16 in the labor force.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:10:29

Your parents are seeking work at that age? Sounds like they got a problem.

No, I specifically stated that they’re not looking for work.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 15:23:51

Then they aren’t counted.

See how that works?

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:53:27

No, that’s what I was trying to explain. They’re counted as being part of the 37% who are not in the participating in the labor force.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 18:07:47

Incorrect.

If they’re not looking for work, they’re not counted.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-06 12:05:05

So, to summarize, Mike: none of your criticisms of the participation rate as a metric shed ANY light on why it has cratered since 2009.

Hint: the job market is still really really terrible.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 12:29:20

why it has cratered since 2009

A combination of rising numbers of retirees, more people in college, and a tough job market seems the most likely.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-06 14:07:17

So, to summarize, Mike: none of your criticisms of the participation rate as a metric shed ANY light on why it has cratered since 2009.

No, that’s wrong. The portion of the population that is over 65 has been growing steadily. The aging of the baby boomers is well known. That explains a big part of its decline in recent years.

However, the point of my criticisms is that the statistic is not useful. It doesn’t tell us much about the state of the labor market.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 15:59:05

Incorrect.

The Labor Force Participation Rate which is at 38 year lows and plummeted under Obama excludes the retired.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 16:35:45

excludes the retired.

Excludes them in the sense that they are not part of the 63% (or whatever it is) that are participating, but are in the 37% that are not.

You clearly don’t understand what the rate shows. It shows the percentage of the total population over 16 that is employed or looking for a job. The retired and students are counted in the part of the population that is not participating.

63% of the over-16 population is either working or looking for work, 37% of the over-16 population is either retired, in school, rich enough not to need to work, supported by someone else, or “discouraged” and no longer looking.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 16:49:52

And Labor Force Participation in the US is at 38 lows.

You clearly don’t understand what that means.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 17:13:04

Retirement of the boomers, mostly.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-06 17:14:12

Look at that BLS graph that you love to link to. It’s right there:

Age: 16 years and over

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 17:42:39

Excluding those not looking for work.

“The country’s labor force participation rate – which measures the share of Americans at least 16 years old who are either employed or actively looking for work – dipped last month to a 38-year low”

Sorry.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 18:52:12

which measures the share of Americans at least 16 years old who are either employed or actively looking for work

Exactly. 63% of over-16s are employed or looking for jobs (that’s called the “participation rate” because they’re “participating” in the work force), 37% are retired, in school, rich, supported, or discouraged (”not participating” in the work force).

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 19:10:21

And the participation rate is at 38 year lows…. and falling.

 
 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 08:28:30

The labor force participation rate can’t rise appreciably until the retired boomers die off and the much smaller Gen X becomes the retired generation.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 08:36:19

Ahhh… Now the generations post-boomer is a smaller cohort.

Get your stories straight.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:29:07

dipped last month to a 38-year low”

FALSE.

The rate was 62.4 last Sept 2015; it has climbed over the intervening months, and the last reported rate (Jan 2016) was 62.7.

So NOT at a 32-year low—just darned close to it. :-)

Stick with the data, poet.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 12:47:53

A distinction without a difference my friend. A distinction without a difference.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 07:53:10

Food Stamps Still Feed One in Seven Americans Despite Recovery

Alan Bjerga
February 3, 2016 — 5:00 AM EST

Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 08:07:47

my sxchool system in the 2nd highest wealth county is USA has 28% of the chillins on free lunch

 
 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 08:07:33

That’s super anemic. The graph of jobs added shows, up, down, up down up down for at least the last year.

It looks like a Wiz Khalifa refrain, up down up down up down. All I do is win, win, win.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 08:09:38

Don’t quit your day job Frank.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 17:26:10

I’m making a comeback.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 08:14:52

“51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year”

Forward!

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 07:44:55

70% of new jobs are minimum-wage waiter and retail positions while living wage jobs continue to vanish in their millions. How’s that hope ‘n change working out for you, Obama Zombies?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/70-jobs-added-january-were-minimum-wage-waiters-and-retail-workers

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 08:09:44

The zombies don’t have jobs, they are the ones on the dole. The ones getting the new low wage jobs are the other characters from The Walking Dead, Rick, Michonne, Daryl, etc. just eaking out an existence.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:14:58

Members of the thinking 5% can totally relate to the characters from “The Walking Dead” as we make our way across a zombie-infested landscape where 95% of the population is brain-dead, i.e. the Obama Zombies, McCain Mutants, and Romney Retards. These shuffling, empty-eyed undead will soon be joined by a fresh crop of vegetables lurching into the voting booths to mindlessly sanction more of the status quo.

 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 09:23:02

The big story yesterday from someone was about Walmart shutting hundreds of stores, presumably eliminating thousands of retail jobs.

Comment by Ethan in Northern VA
2016-02-05 10:58:17

They’ve eliminated the competition, now people can drive tot he nearby store.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 07:54:07

Has the Baltic Dry Index found the ground yet?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 07:58:39

Analysis / Freight / New lows hit by Baltic Dry Index
New lows hit by Baltic Dry Index
The cost of shipping dry goods across the ocean continues to explore uncharted waters, with the Baltic Dry Index now below 300 points for the first time ever.
By Phil Franz-Warkentin
Published: 05 February 2016 11:42 AM

The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) was quoted at 298 points on Thursday (February 4), marking a new low since records beganin 1985. The index was trading above 1,200 as recently as the beginning of August, 2015, but has struggled ever since with “new record lows”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 08:01:53

Baltic Dry Index Headed for the 200’s
February 3, 2016 by Reuters

Feb 3 (Reuters) – The Baltic Exchange’s main sea freight index, which tracks rates for ships carrying industrial commodities, tumbled to another fresh low on Wednesday on worries about vessel oversupply and slowing global demand.

The overall index, which gauges the cost of shipping dry bulk including iron ore, cement, grain, coal and fertiliser, fell seven points or 2.26 percent to 303 points.

The index has yet to register a single session of gains this year, recording new lows in 21 of the 23 sessions.

A slowdown in the Chinese economy, which grew at its slowest pace in a quarter of a century in 2015, and a huge over-capacity in vessels has hit the index hard.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 08:36:12

and a huge over-capacity in vessels

That’s the confounder. Ships were possibly even more overbuilt than housing in the last bubble.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 08:54:36

With a far worse collapse in dry bulk shipping demand compared to the housing demand collapse. ..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2016-02-05 10:41:54

When do bulk shippers start going BK?

And who would you go long on during the consolidation phase that inevitably will occur?

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 11:00:34

I might buy myself a ship, play around with it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 16:49:01

Baltic Dry Index falls to 297, down 1 points.
in Dry Bulk Market 05/02/2016

Today, Friday, February 05 2016, the Baltic Dry Index decreased by 1 points, reaching 297 points.

Baltic Dry Index is compiled by the London-based Baltic Exchange and covers prices for transported cargo such as coal, grain and iron ore. The index is based on a daily survey of agents all over the world. Baltic Dry hit a temporary peak on May 20, 2008, when the index hit 11,793. The lowest level ever reached was on Friday, February 05 2016, when the index dropped to 297 points.

Source: Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:12:49

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Business
Dry-Bulk Shipping Firms Face Unprecedented Crisis
Companies selling vessels to survive
By Costas Paris
Updated Jan. 20, 2016 1:13 p.m. ET

LONDON—Falling demand from China is wreaking havoc among the world’s biggest shipping companies, forcing some to offload vessels at a discount to survive one of the industry’s deepest crisis.

“Things have just stopped in China,” said George Logothetis, chairman and chief executive of the Libra Group, an international shipping firm.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:17:25

NIKKEI ASIAN REVIEW
February 5, 2016 2:30 pm JST
Commodities Eye
Dry-bulk shipping under water as bankruptcies rise
Michael Sainsbury, Asia Regional Correspondent
A container ship at a port in Tokyo © Reuters

BANGKOK — The global commodities bust has rocked the dry-bulk shipping industry, with a wave of bankruptcies washing across the sector and major players forced to restructure, divest or scrap assets.

On Jan. 5, the Shanghai International Shipping Institute issued a striking report after polling about 50 of the nation’s largest bulk shippers. The survey concluded that more than 60% of the firms it polled were struggling with long-term losses and about 40% faced liquidity problems.

“The market is extremely depressed and these conditions are likely to continue in 2016, exacerbating dry bulk firms’ losses, increasing costs and creating obstacles to obtaining financing. This will kick-start a wave of bankruptcies,” government-run SISI said in the report.

Already so far, more than half a dozen shipping companies from countries including Hong Kong, China, South Korea, Japan and the U.S. have filed for bankruptcy in the past two years. In 2015, bankruptcies gathered pace as orders dried up while new ships continued to enter the market.

Japan’s fifth largest dry-bulk shipping company Daiichi Chuo Kisen and its wholly owned subsidiary Star Bulk Carriers Co. filed for bankruptcy in September. Prior to that, in the first quarter of 2015, privately owned Danish company Copenship, South Korea’s Daebo International Shipping Co., China’s Winland Ocean Shipping Corp. and Hong Kong-based Shagang Shipping filed for bankruptcy proceedings.

The bad news rolled on into 2016. Japan’s “Big Three” shipping companies — Mitsui O.S.K Lines, Nippon Yusen and Kawasaki Kisen (K Line) — all slashed their earnings outlooks drastically in January.

Mitsui said that for the year ended March 2016, it expected to now report a consolidated net loss of 175 billion yen ($1.47 billion) from a previously projected profit of 17 billion yen. It will book 180 billion yen in extraordinary losses due to the retirement of vessels and other restructuring expenses.

Executive Officer Hideo Horiguchi told reporters the company had to streamline operations “because shipping fees of container and bulk vessels are unlikely to recover due to the Chinese economy’s slowdown and the deteriorating economies of Russia, Brazil and other natural resource [producing] countries.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:34:04

BRIC economies, R.I.P.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:28:28

MarineLink dot com
Dry-Bulk Shipping: Hitting the Bottom
By Aiswarya Lakshmi
Friday, February 05, 2016
File Photo: China COSCO Bulk Shipping (Group) Co

Dry bulk shipping companies being hit the hardest on account of the deteriorating business climate are likely to be swept by a new wave of bankruptcies, reports Nikkei.

The global commodities bust has rocked the dry-bulk shipping industry, with a wave of bankruptcies washing across the sector and major players forced to restructure, divest or scrap assets.

Many in the industry had hoped it would start to recover this year. But there is not much sign of that—and it looks as if more pain is still in store for shipowners.

On Jan. 5, the Shanghai International Shipping Institute issued a striking report after polling about 50 of the nation’s largest bulk shippers. The survey concluded that 60% of the firms it polled were struggling with long-term losses and about 40% faced liquidity problems.

“The market is extremely depressed and these conditions are likely to continue in 2016, exacerbating dry bulk firms’ losses, increasing costs and creating obstacles to obtaining financing. This will kick-start a wave of bankruptcies,” government-run SISI said in the report.

Small dry bulk shippers have already started filing for bankruptcy. Japanese bulk carrier Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha filed for protection from creditors on September 29, and Global Maritime Investments Cyprus Ltd. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States on September 15.

According to Freight Investor Services, “The world’s fleet of dry bulk carriers has grown 84% since 2013 while bulk cargo demand has grown by only 33% in the same period and is set to grow by 1–2% for the next several years.”

According to the Chinese shipping sentiment survey, more than 60% of the 50 dry bulk shipping companies surveyed were coping with long-term losses and nearly forty percent of the companies were facing long-term liquidity problems.

What is more, a considerable number of dry bulk shipping companies are stretched to the edge of bankruptcy.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:55:11

A warning for commodity markets
in Commodity News 05/02/2016

The plummeting Baltic Dry Index, a daily indicator which tracks the shipping rates for dry bulk goods such as coal and iron ore, does not necessarily mean trade in commodities is collapsing.

The index, considered a bellwether for the global economy, hit an all-time low of 310 points this week and has yet to register a single session of gains this year. After hitting a peak of 11 793 points in May 2008, it has come under pressure from the financial crisis and slowing economic growth in China.

According to Peter Sand, Chief Shipping Analyst at BIMCO, the index’s current lows are a reflection of the overall state of the dry bulk shipping market. Shipbuilding, ramped up to service the commodities boom, has led to a high imbalance between supply and demand. In 2015, dry bulk shipping capacity of 50m deadweight tonnes (DWT) was added, while only 30m DWT was removed. BIMCO expects continued growth in capacity this year. “Unless the supply side adjusts accordingly, freight rates will continue to come under pressure,” said Sand.

He further said that freight rates are likely to recover by year end: “The first quarter is traditionally the weakest in terms of demand and the fourth quarter is the strongest.”

But the slump in bulk commodity prices hasn’t translated into increased trade. Data, from shipping services company Clarksons, shows world trade in dry bulk fell 0.3% year-on-year to 4.7bn tonnes in 2015. The weighted average earnings for a range of bulk carriers decreased 27.9% to $7 123 per day over the same period.

Freight in iron ore and coal, comprising a third and a quarter of dry bulk trade respectively, slowed the most in 2015 (see chart below).

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 07:59:18

Are you living “the American Dream”? If so, you should consider yourself to be very fortunate, because most Americans are not.

The American Dream Is Dead, And Now Even The Mainstream Media Is Starting To Admit It

Michael Snyder | End Of The American Dream - February 5, 2016

In fact, as you will see below, a new survey has found that there is nowhere on the entire planet where the average wage earner is making enough money to live “the American Dream”. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now the middle class makes up a minority of the population, 51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year, and poverty is growing rapidly. The American Dream is essentially dead, and even the mainstream media is starting to figure this out.

Just today, someone sent me a U.S. News & World Report article entitled “Even Americans Can’t Afford the American Dream”. The following is an excerpt from that article…

The study goes country by country, factoring in average local wages and prices to calculate the regional costs of luxuries such as midsize homes (by U.S. standards, 1,480 square feet); electricity and high-speed Internet; cars and enough money for gasoline; food for a family of four; and enough disposable income to periodically dine out and attend movies or other events.

Researchers ultimately found there isn’t a country on the map whose average wage earner could afford all of these expenses together. What’s more, average consumers in Saudi Arabia and Oman are actually closer to financing these socioeconomic goals than the average American. The average Saudi household would only need to see monthly salaries climb by about $74 to realize the American dream in their own country, while U.S. workers would need hundreds of dollars in additional income.

Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 08:17:54

Breed children that you can’t afford and this is what you get.

P.S. Bill in Los Angeles = WIN.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 17:30:01

Sorry, just don’t buy that. I keep thinking of sandy baloney sandwiches on a lonely lunchtime beach. Get busy living or get busy dying.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 18:15:18

I keep thinking about Greek prostitutes who will do it for a sandwich.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 10:44:44

“$30,000 a year, and poverty…”

“…midsize homes (by U.S. standards, 1,480 square feet); electricity and high-speed Internet; cars and enough money for gasoline; food for a family of four; and enough disposable income to periodically dine out and attend movies or other events.”

“U.S. workers would need hundreds of dollars in additional income”

We’ve been so spoiled by a generation long credit binge.

In the 1950s my solidly middle class family of four lived comfortably in less than 1000 ft2 house. We had a car and a phone and actually a B/W TV. Long distance calls were made with an egg timer running. Eating out was Sunday dinner at Grandma’s. Saturday there was free music in the village park and we usually walked to do our shopping. There was no debt. There were no school busses.

What we now call poverty is a higher standard of living than what was middle class then.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 17:31:47

Burger King has 10 nuggets for $1.49.

 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 21:19:17

What we now call poverty is a higher standard of living than what was middle class then.

So the Fed has done a good job? Or the government?

Or both?

 
 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 08:06:08

151`k jobs is less than the birth/death ratio
= net loss

nes paw?

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 08:26:28

Do you want me to read the card?

Ex-German media boss admits on live radio the national news agenda is govt controlled

Published time: 4 Feb, 2016 17:31

If you really want a lesson in how the Western popular press works, this is it.

Without question, Germany is the leading power in Europe. ZDF is its state broadcaster and most popular channel.

Together with sister network ARD; German’s are obliged to pay €17.98 per month to fund it.

This week, during a radio event in Berlin, the retired head of ZDF Bonn, Dr Wolfgang Herles, dropped a bombshell. He admitted the network, and others, takes orders from the government on what, and what not, to report.

Now, you’d expect this kind of story to be splashed across the world’s press, wouldn’t you? A former senior management figure acknowledging that his ex-employers work in tandem with the authorities to control the news agenda in such an important country? If such a revelation was made in a ‘developing’ nation, NATO media would be all over it.

Yet, it’s not. As I write, only London’s Daily Mail and America’s Breitbart and RT have bothered to report this amazing story.

The BBC, a carbon copy of ZDF and ARD in Britain, is busy promoting a documentary about a fake Russian invasion of Latvia. Meanwhile, in Germany itself, RT Deutsch and Munich’s Focus appear to be the only two significant outlets tackling the revelations. This in a country where the Dresden region was once known as the “valley of the stupid” because Western TV signals couldn’t reach much of it during the Cold War.

Well-founded fears

Many people across Europe suspect that most domestic state TV is under fairly direct control of politicians. The BBC, despite its mendacious cultivation of an image of fairness, is a pretty obvious example. It is governed by a Trust, wholly appointed by the Queen on the advice of government ministers of the day. Russia’s most popular station, the First Channel, although partially privately owned, is also administered by state appointees.

What makes Herles’ outburst so significant is his seniority. Before retiring last year, he was a prominent culture editor and presenter. In the 90’s, he hosted his own chat show, ‘Live’, and prior to these ventures, he’d been head of ZDF Bonn. At that time, Bonn was the West German capital. It’s important to understand that ZDF, while available across Germany, is technically owned by the Bundesländer (states).

Thus, Bonn-based Herles would have had far greater understanding of how German politics worked than most in ZDF’s Mainz headquarters, never mind far flung regions.

Turning a blind eye

Since the Cologne sex attacks on New Year’s Eve, there have been strong allegations that German media downplayed, or even ignored, the story. With migrants, predominately Arabic in origin, pouring into the country since last year, highlighting assaults where the alleged perpetrators were of Arab appearance could help turn public opinion against Angela Merkel’s “open-borders” policy. On the other hand, ignoring infractions by newcomers serves to keep Germans ignorant about how Berlin’s scheme could jeopardize their own safety. A lot of people are, understandably, angry about that.

Herles’ admission was prompted by the assertion that ordinary people have lost faith in Germany’s tightly-controlled media. “We have the problem that – now I’m mainly talking about the public [state] media – we have closeness to the government,” he revealed. “Not only because commentary is mainly in line with the grand coalition (CSU, CDU, and SPD), with the spectrum of opinion, but also because we are completely taken in by the agenda laid down by the political class.”

The retired ZDF chief went on to concede that the station took orders on what to broadcast. “The topics about which are reported are laid down by the government,” he confessed. Ironically, the Guardian, with no actual evidence, has prominently published numerous allegations of the Kremlin engaging in this practice. However, it ignores a similar assertion about Germany, which is actually backed up by a credible figure.

Of course, it’s not just the publicly-owned media; their private counterparts are also far from balanced. Bild Zeitung, Germany’s bestselling newspaper, is bound by the charter of its holding company, Axel Springer SE, “to further the unification of Europe.” Moreover, it must “support the Transatlantic Alliance, and solidarity with the United States of America in the common values of free nations.” Even the fairest editor in the world wouldn’t have much leeway under those conditions.
Pan European myopia

As it happens Germany is not alone. Last year, the Times Ireland exposed how Dublin’s state-controlled RTE routinely furnishes questions to government ministers before they appear on air. Incredibly, RTE News, currently helmed by controversial British executive Kevin Bakhurst, responded by attempting to smear The Times.

Meanwhile, in Sweden, the fervently liberal Expressen newspaper this week labeled The Daily Mail ‘racist.’ The British newspaper’s crime? Daring to report facts on the country’s migrant crisis that are precluded in Sweden. Because the domestic media refuse to cover negative stories involving migrants, many Swedes are now forced to access British and Russian media to read news about their country.

Right now, the pro-EU press is struggling to control the narrative. Dismissing rival viewpoints as “propaganda” can only work for so long. Furthermore, turning a blind eye to stories that question EU policy is a tougher proposition in the age of social media.

Last year, Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine closed online comment threads on all articles about migration. Last week, The Guardian followed suit, blocking all posts related to immigration, Islam and race.

These moves aren’t a huge surprise. In recent years, journalists and commentators who refuse to fall-in-line with the liberal European consensus have been increasingly barred from the mainstream media. This stands in marked contrast to previous decades in which debate was actively encouraged and opposing views cherished. Maybe Mikhail Gorbachev wasn’t far off when he warned:”The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Soviet Union in Western Europe.”

http://www.rt.com/op-edge/331318-german-media-merkel-control/ - 47k -

Comment by Goon
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:32:27

The litmus test for a real journalist (who who wants an actual paycheck, anyway) is your zeal for disseminating DNC talking points and Oligopoly-approved narratives. Once Comrade Pelosi has her permanent Democrat supermajority, then those pesky citizen bloggers who speak truth to power and debunk The Narrative can finally be rounded up and sent to detention camps. It’s for the children….

 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-02-05 09:45:12

remember the Loindon olympics
NHS parade
” no worse tyrany than being forced to pay for the speech of others”

PSA

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 09:26:40

John Wayne, Big Jake - respect your betters - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq0gp54818A - 166k -

Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 09:38:18

No we know who the betters are. Why they don’t want their kids to call them Daddy remains a mystery.

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 10:06:29

So we betters are like John Wayne. And those who dis us are immature boy-men with daddy issues, whom we beat some sense into.

Sounds about right! Thanks, phony!

Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 10:26:17

So we betters

Shall we call you Big Oddie sir?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 11:02:36

Just say it with a smile, pilgrim!

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 10:48:04

“No we know who the betters are.”

“So we betters are like John Wayne.”

I knew you guys would come around eventually.

The following is a list of generally conservative or libertarian American Patriot celebrities who are for the Second Amendment. May of these persons have earned a lot of money in movies and TV shows where they routinely use firearms. You may consider supporting those celebrities who support our gun rights:

Summary List of Celebrity Second Amendment Supporters

Adam Baldwin
Dan Bilzerian
Charles Bronson
Chef Alton Brown
Jimmy Cagney
Dean Cain
Eric Clapton
S.E. Cupp
Johnny Depp
Clint Eastwood
Sam Elliot
R. Lee Ermey
Gandhi
James Hetfield of Metallica
Angelina Jolie
James Earl Jones
Tommy Lee Jones
John F. Kennedy
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Miranda Lambert
Dana Loesch
Joe Mantegna
Chuck Norris
Ted Nugent
Joe Perry of Aerosmith
Brad Pitt
Tom Selleck
Gary Sinise
Brooke Anne Smith
Kevin Sorbo
Jimmy Stewart
John Wayne
Bruce Willis

http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:List_of_celebrities_who_support_the_Second_Amendment - 106k - Cached - Similar pages
Jan 25, 2016

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 11:04:41

A lot of progressives in there.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2016-02-05 11:37:46

Some of my favorites are now beyond support.

 
Comment by Muggy
2016-02-05 17:46:05

Metallica uses real gun sounds on their records.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:16:46

“Anyone who says the American economy is in decline is peddling fiction.”

–President Barak Obama, 2016 SOTU address.

(Breaking news: Obama is going to give an address on the [stagnating] economy.)

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-to-make-statement-on-economy-at-1230-pm-eastern-2016-02-05?link=MW_home_latest_news

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 10:24:24

Burning with rage. CRATER RAGE!!!!!!!

http://goo.gl/42ujDs

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:26:11

Where have you gone, Al Bundy, our nation turns its lonely eyes to you….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgDtgyzVZYk

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 10:43:02

Everything is awesome! 94.5 million ‘Muricans “out of the work force” but only 4.9% unemployment! Buy moar stawks! Take on dangerous levels of debt to buy a new car and a bigger house! Buy with confidence: Suzanne researched this….

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/president-obama-explains-how-surging-bartender-jobs-are-unequivocally-good-live-feed

Comment by rj chicago
2016-02-05 11:29:59

Ray K …
this….

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/70-jobs-added-january-were-minimum-wage-waiters-and-retail-workers

And our illustrious leader of unicorns and lollipops was cheerleading a bit ago today about how the pom pom squad is doing - 4.9% U3 and increasing hourly wages. I guess in obama world a wage increase of 8.25 an hour from nothing is indeed an increase. Sheesh!!!

http://wwwtheworldandeverythinginit.blogspot.com/2016/02/president-obama-delivers-statement-on.html

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 12:13:01

Obama is set for life once he gets out of office and starts raking in his payola from implementing Obama Care and ensuring no meaningful reform on Wall Street. The proles who voted for hope ‘n change, on the other hand, are going to be bleeding from every orrifice as they get their hope ‘n change good and hard.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 13:28:31

11k baby boomers turn 65 each day for the next 15 yrs.

who are these 94 mill? We have help wanted signs up all over the place. Some people refuse to work. others are toothless zombies with no skills.

Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:03:17

Many of those 94 million are, in fact, senior citizens. If employers are actually having trouble hiring people, then they should increase the pay and benefits that they’re offering.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 15:29:24

supply and demand…. if they need to pay more, they need to pay more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ethan in Northern VA
2016-02-05 11:02:23

Many tech stocks cr8ring today.
LinkedIn and others.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 11:15:52

You ain’t seen nothing yet.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2016-02-05 12:50:34

LinkedIn and others.

I still don’t get why these electronic bulletin boards are “tech”. And how does LinkedIn make money anyway? By placing ads on their webpage?

 
Comment by Puggs
2016-02-05 14:13:59

It ain’t a’kraterin’ until DOW passes 10,000…

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 11:54:39

Why do markets always plunge after Obama tells us how great the economy is doing?

http://www.marketwatch.com

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 12:15:14

Gold miners rising while Ponzi stocks are tanking. Ka-CHING!

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-05 12:23:29

You don’t become financially secure if you rarely say no. I bought a timeshare out of a brain flatulence episode years ago. It is at various locations around the U.S. I am at one in Napa Valley now. It makes more sense to use it now that I get paid vacation.

Yet I realized I like the old way in case I do NOT want to travel away from my computer work at home in OC.

Every time I use my time share they have a sales pitch for buying more points. I walked out with two free nights at one of these resorts after a firm no. Great deal and got a “free” breakfast. Burp

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 13:34:52

Time shares are horrible “investments.” I go to the sales pitches and get free crap and stays, never ever buy!!

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:21:14

When I was a teenager I worked in the dinning room of a high-end resort. The timeshare salesmen (and women) would gather after hours and gloat openly about how they had closed the deals and ripped off the dupes.

I imagine Soros and Obama had a similar laugh in some smokey back room as they guffawed about the bill of goods they sold to the hope ‘n change dupes.

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-05 21:40:16

I think car salesmen and realtards do the same.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 21:44:33

Every type of sales person does. Sales draws sociopaths.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 12:24:29
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 13:34:02

Gold back in the green after failed suppression/manipulation attempt.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/gold-surges-back-green-after-12-billion-morning-plunge

 
Comment by Goon
2016-02-05 13:34:28

Benjamin Crump, attorney for the famblies of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, endorses the Hillary:

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/benjamin-crump-endorses-hillary-clinton-218832

Got Arizona Iced Tea brand Watermelon Fruit Punch, Skittles, and Promethazine with codeine? LOLZ

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_drank

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by In Colorado
2016-02-05 14:51:04

IIRC, that number was approaching 50 million at one point a few years ago.

 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 14:53:54

I like food stamps. Only $160 a mo, spent locally on food, keeps the zombies out of jail at $50k a yr.

but I am a fiscal conservative.

Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-05 17:47:57

That lie per recipient number you peddle includes all the kids, who aren’t eligible for prison. It’s a manipulated average. Welfare is more than $25K per family (and excluding under the table cash).

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 20:39:22

“but I am a fiscal conservative Debt Donkey.”

Fixt.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:06:00

This has nothing to do with “our strength”. Your understanding of diversity is also strange.

 
 
Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 15:06:05

How can everyone think that 95% of America is stupid?

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2016-02-05 15:27:28

Wake up, sheeple!

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-05 15:29:30

It allows people to think that they’re in that elite 5%. That makes them feel good about themselves, which is a great feeling.

Of course, if you buy into that bell curve theory, most people are pretty close to average.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-02-05 15:48:19

Because there is a .95 probability they are stupid, stupid!

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:24:25

How can everyone think that 95% of America is stupid?

If you are a member of the 99% and you voted for Oligopoly water carriers Obama, MCain, or Romney, that is prima facie evidence of stupidity.

 
Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-06 07:51:55

I don’t. I think 95% of American voters are stupid. Most people don’t vote. The no voters are the most intelligent Americans.

 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-05 16:15:37

Documents: Obama Has Spent $74 million In Taxpayer Dollars On Holidays

Steve Watson | Infowars.com - February 5, 2016

The Obama family has wracked up a bill of $74 million, charged to the taxpayer, in vacations since taking office, according to recently obtained records.

The watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit to find out how much money the first family has spent on luxury getaways since Obama took office.

Documents, obtained after Freedom of Information Act requests were ignored, reveal that the total figure is at least $74,124,562.48.

“Now that we’ve sued, the Secret Service has stopped ignoring our requests for details on more of the costs of Barack Obama’s luxury vacations,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said on Wednesday.

The records show that just two of the most recent Obama family vacations cost taxpayers more than $5 million dollars.

Secret service accommodations alone for the 2014 Martha’s Vineyard and Honolulu vacations cost taxpayers $1,243,057.

“Taxpayers, the U.S. Air Force and the Secret Service are being abused by Barack Obama, who too often treats Air Force One and his security detail like some of sort of kingly entourage.” Fitton noted.

“Does Barack Obama really think that over $5 million for two family vacations, which include nearly $1 million in Secret Service hotel bills for a two week Martha’s Vineyard vacation, is an appropriate use of tax dollars?” the Judicial Watch President urged.

The group highlighted that in Martha’s Vineyard, the Obama family booked out a “plush, secluded seven-bedroom, nine-bath, 8,100-square-foot house in the exclusive Chilmark neighborhood.”

An earlier day trip to New York, just to “hang out with his girls” was said to have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In October, Judicial Watch revealed that in just two months the President spent close to $4.5 million on golfing and fundraising trips.

The documents showed that:

Obama’s February 14, 2015, golf outing to Palm Springs required a five-hour flight, costing taxpayers a total of $1,031,685.
Transportation for Obama’s February 19 day trip to Chicago cost taxpayers $619,011.00.
Transportation for Obama’s March 2015 fundraising trip to Los Angeles cost taxpayers $1,980,835.20.
Obama’s March 28, 2015, golf outing to Palm city required a 3.9-hour flight, costing taxpayers $804,870.30.

The two golf outings alone cost taxpayers $1,836,555 in travel expenses. Obama played a total of five rounds of golf, equating to a cost of $20,406 per hole.

Comment by CalifoH20
2016-02-05 16:31:27

It gets more expensive each year.

Dwight Eisenhower played almost 800 rounds during his eight-year presidency, according to a study of his daily itinerary cited in Golf Digest — many times what Obama has played.

And Eisenhower is not even the No. 1 golf-playing president. Woodrow Wilson played nearly 1,200 rounds during his two terms. Wilson “played more rounds of golf than any president in history,” said Wilson’s biographer, A. Scott Berg.

Comment by rms
2016-02-06 10:49:55

It’s not the number of rounds… it’s who they’re swinging with.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:32:19

He would’ve cost us far more than that had he been sitting in the Oval Office coming up with bright ideas for more hope ‘n change.

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-02-05 19:31:23

Think of all the un-launched drone strikes.

 
 
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-05 21:40:27

Has Infowars ever added up how much a white president spent on vacations?

 
 
Comment by rj chicago
2016-02-05 16:23:28

Thought for today - borrowed from the commentary on Investment Research Dynamics…

“I used to take drugs to make things look weird.
Now I take drugs to make things look normal.”

Can’t be more succinct than that and can’t agree more!!!
We are f….ed!!!!

Comment by Muggy
2016-02-05 17:34:44

“I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too”
- Mitch Hedberg

Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-02-05 19:32:23

Reality is for people that can’t handle drugs.

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:30:50

I covered most of my tech shorts today, which means next week will be a bloodbath for tech stocks. Oh well. I made a decent haul and can’t complain. Lots of fools who bought in the peak of the Ponzi are getting their heads handed to them. I can only imagine the “Deliverance” style squealing going up tonight as the margin calls go out to the bagholders whose pigs (i.e. LNKD and DATA) got slaughtered today.

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 16:39:46

The zombies of Flint, Michigan, voted for corrupt, incompetent Democrat municipal administrations (redundant, I realize), then shockingly, got bad governance. Sorry, just can’t work up any sympathy for people who get the kind of government they vote for (and then keep voting for more of the same).

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/flint-officials-could-have-prevented-lead-crisis-80-day-broke-federal-law-instead

Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 12:44:31

If you read up about it, it looks like it was a project of the state gov, under a GOP governor. We’ll find out, this sucker is going to the courts.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 17:12:53

How long can Obama and his courtiers and media lapdogs keep denying the reality of the stagnating American economy?

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231086

Comment by azdude
2016-02-05 17:28:37

until the election for sure. if clinton wins it will be the same old.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-05 18:17:59

lol@azdonk

Comment by azdude
2016-02-06 06:38:41

how was your natty lite last night?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 09:02:27

Hows that run down shanty treating you AZ_Donk?

 
Comment by azdude
2016-02-06 11:24:38

being in cash 7 years makes u the real DONK.

 
Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 11:57:55

Az_Donk….. Only you’re proud of paying a grossly inflated price for a depreciating asset and then doubled down by financing.

 
 
 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-02-05 19:34:11

And if Trump, Cruz, or Rubio win, it will be holy war. Hooray!

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 17:29:45

To our resident progressives: why is Hillary balking at releasing the transcripts of her speeches to Goldman Sachs audiences? Surely such a champion of the middle class would want transparency to avoid any appearance of crony capitalism, right?

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/05/hillary-clintons-campaign-resists-releasing-transcripts-from-goldman-speeches/

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 17:48:39

Hillary Clinton: You have no individual right to own a gun. (Serfs do not require self-protection when the Lord of the Manor is handling security.)

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/02/hillary-clinton-will-end-private-gun-ownership/#axzz3zLPGwZrE

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-06 07:26:38

No president will end private gun ownership. Lead in my skull or torso will end my private gun ownership.

Comment by rms
2016-02-06 10:57:30

Take your lead with water or propelled by expanding gases?

 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-02-05 18:47:58

Bill and Hillary have collected more than $153 million in Wall Street payola. If you like your crony capitalism….

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/index.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 23:43:35

Is there any truth to the rumor that Trump has mob ties in New Jersey?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 23:47:55

Politics
July 31, 2015
Journalist Details Donald Trump’s ‘Extensive’ Mob Ties
Mike Bessler

At virtually every turn in the early months of the presidential primary season, Donald Trump has looked and functioned like some sort of Teflon-coated candidate.

Despite ruffling feathers with comments about veterans and Mexicans, as well as a spate of controversies over dated allegations of misogyny and marital rape, Trump’s poll numbers continue to rise week after week. Now, an investigative journalist is raising questions regarding the real estate mogul’s business ties to organized crime with a report that could ultimately affect Trump’s appeal to voters.

Wayne Barrett, a New York journalist who wrote a 1992 unauthorized biography of Donald Trump, recently spoke to CNN, sharing his findings regarding the presidential candidate’s past business relationships with gangsters. In presenting Barrett’s findings, CNN noted that Trump’s ties to organized crime allegedly involve documented endeavors with mob-controlled construction companies in New York and Philadelphia during the 1980s and 1990s.

“There was a certain amount of mob association during which the father and he were building, which was very difficult to avoid in the New York construction world,” Barrett told CNN, “He went out of his way not to avoid them, but to increase them.”

The Federalist also took an in-depth look at the possibility that Trump may have dealt with some unseemly characters and entities over the course of his storied career. Once again drawing on the work of Wayne Barrett, reported David Marcus traces The Donald’s earliest entanglements with the mob to a real estate purchase from notorious Philly mobster Salvatore Testa. He also details Trump’s apparent connections to Philly crime boss Nicodemo “Little Nicky” Scarfo and convicted murderer Phillip “Crazy Phil” Leonetti, who were apparently involved in the construction of Trump Plaza in Atlantic City.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-05 23:54:07

News Nation & World
Trump swam in mob-infested waters in early years as an NYC developer
Throughout his early career, Donald Trump routinely worked with mob-controlled companies and unions on his projects.
(Seth Wenig / AP)
Robert O’Harrow Jr.The Washington Post

As billionaire developer Donald Trump became the toast of New York in the 1980s, he often attributed his rise to salesmanship and verve. “Deals are my art form,” he wrote.

But there is another aspect to his success that he doesn’t often discuss. Throughout his early career, Trump routinely gave large campaign contributions to politicians who held sway over his projects and he worked with mob-controlled companies and unions to build them.

Americans have rarely contemplated a candidate quite like Trump, 69, who has become the unlikely leader among Republican Party contenders for the White House. He’s a brash Queens-born scion who navigated through one of the most corrupt construction industries in the country to become a brand-name business mogul.

Much has been written about his early career, but many details have been obscured by the passage of time and overshadowed by Trump’s success and celebrity.

A Washington Post review of court records, testimony by Trump and other accounts that have been out of the public eye for decades offer insights into his rise. He was never accused of illegality, and observers of the time say that working with the mob-related figures and politicos came with the territory. Trump declined repeated requests to comment.

One state examination in the late 1980s of the New York City construction industry concluded that “official corruption is part of an environment in which developers and contractors cultivate and seek favors from public officials at all levels.”

Trump gave so generously to political campaigns that he sometimes lost track of the amounts, documents show. In 1985 alone, he contributed about $150,000 to local candidates, the equivalent of $330,000 today.

Officials with the New York State Organized Crime Task Force later said that Trump, while not breaking any laws, “circumvented” state limits on individual and corporate contributions “by spreading his payments among eighteen subsidiary companies.”

Trump alluded to his history of political giving in August this year, at the first Republican debate, bragging that he gave money with the confidence that he would get something in return.

“I was a businessman. I give to everybody. When they call, I give. And you know what? When I need something from them, two years later, three years later, I call them. They are there for me,” he said. “And that’s a broken system.”

As he fed the political machine, he also had to work with unions and companies known to be controlled by New York’s ruling mafia families, which had infiltrated the construction industry, according to court records, federal task force reports and newspaper accounts. No serious presidential candidate has ever had his depth of business relationships with the mob-controlled entities.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 00:01:15

January 24, 2016, 11:10 am
Trump defends shooting comments
By Keith Laing

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump on Sunday defended his comments about being able to shoot someone and retain support from GOP voters.

Asked during an appearance on CBS’s “Face The Nation” about his declaration that “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters,” Trump said the comments were intended to demonstrate the durability of his polling advantage ahead of early voting in states like Iowa and New Hampshire.

“Well, I have a very great group of people … I have people that are so loyal and it’s been so reported and even in your poll, but in a lot of the polls they do that, the loyalty factor,” he said.

“And my factor’s up. When you add it all up, it’s pretty much close to 90 percent,” Trump continued. “These are people that just won’t leave, they will not leave. I love my people. And it’s a great thing. I mean, it’s a great thing. Far greater loyalty than any other candidate by double, triple, quadruple, and I love my people.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 10:55:56

“Trump said the comments were intended to demonstrate the durability of his polling advantage ahead of early voting in states like Iowa…”

How did that advantage work out for Trump?

 
 
Comment by Hi-Z
2016-02-06 08:22:53

This sort of post smacks of you serving as a self-appointed anti-Trump troll. I don’t think spreading rumors and jawbones is going to make Trump go away.

Comment by palmetto
2016-02-06 09:16:18

LOL, up above he posted that Trump suffered a “crushing defeat” in Iowa. Apparently a “crushing defeat” is a four point loss. The guy’s a college professor, for Jeebus’ sake. With all the talk of failed education in the US, it’s beyond embarrassing, but it does speak to why the country is in the shape it’s in and how scientists and economists and other academics have become nothing more than paid propaganda mouthpieces.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 10:37:31

‘LOL, up above he posted that Trump suffered a “crushing defeat” in Iowa. Apparently a “crushing defeat” is a four point loss.’

Sorry if math is too hard for you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2016-02-06 11:21:27

Sorry if myth is too hard for you.

There, fixed it for ya.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 12:21:28

Stupid is as stupid sez.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 12:24:12

Cruz 27.6
Trump 24.3

Percentage gap in their vote shares =

(27.6-24.3)/(27.6+24.3)*100% = 6.4%.

This is a huge margin of victory for Cruz, and of defeat for Trump, particularly given that everyone predicted Trump would easily win the Iowa primary.

 
Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-06 14:18:43

That’s an odd way to look at it, ignoring all the other candidates. Please perform the same arithmetic for us on Wednesday morning after Trump wins in New Hampshire.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 18:10:01

“That’s an odd way to look at it, ignoring all the other candidates.”

It’s misleading to not correct a head-to-head comparison between two candidates for the confounding influence of others not involved in the comparison.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 09:39:30

I just share potentially useful information here.

I’m not a troll. That’s your job.

Comment by Hi-Z
2016-02-06 12:38:22

Deflect, deflect, deflect!
Methinks the lady doth protest too much!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 13:04:33

You certainly do, Lady Macbeth.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 07:26:49

Does Hillary take testosterone treatments to make her voice seem more manly? I can’t stand the thought of listening to her make speeches over the course of four-years in that fake low voice.

Comment by The Selfish Hoarder
2016-02-06 07:50:11

I won’t even listen. She is a zero. Like all presidents. All zeros.

Comment by Mafia Blocks
2016-02-06 11:56:14

^can’t argue with that.

 
 
Comment by I am yuuuge in Burma
2016-02-06 08:50:10

Why do you hate women?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 10:23:28

Plenty of women manage to maintain their femininity while still exhibiting poise and wielding power.

By contrast, phony masculinity is venal. Why not just elect a male president if the only female alternative is a wannabe male?

Comment by MightyMike
2016-02-06 14:22:30

It seems like an odd way to choose how to cast your voice. Who has the best speaking voice. Maybe Ben Carson, with his calm, “low energy” demeanor would be a good one. If you hear him on the evening news after a stressful day at the office, his voice could help you to relax.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Oddfellow
2016-02-06 14:52:23

Didn’t Carson drop out of the race after he ran out of fresh clothes?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 18:25:57

“It seems like an odd way to choose how to cast your voice.”

I have no idea why Hillary tries to make her voice sound so low and butch, but I agree with you that it is odd, and highly annoying to boot.

 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-06 09:45:52

“Does Hillary take testosterone treatments to make her voice seem more manly?”

Cankleist

Comment by rms
2016-02-06 13:07:33

“Cankleist”

Cruel. :)

 
 
Comment by FrankBruno
2016-02-06 09:47:52

Testosterone doesn’t produce whiney nasally sounds, it brings the base.

In other news, this real professor has been forecasting a San Diego slowdown since August. Any firesales yet?

http://patch.com/california/ranchobernardo-4sranch/professor-san-diego-area-economic-rally-over

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 10:35:07

I can’t recall making any recent near-term predictions for San Diego real estate prices. I’ve been too busy exposing The Don’s mob ties and such.

It seems like you’re making sh!t up again, which is what you do best.

But since you brought up the subject, I will mention that prices in my area are up by about 50% over the past three or so years against a backdrop of relatively weak income growth. The market is back in bubble territory and poised for another crash once prices reach the Echo Bubble tipping point. We will only know the exact timing of this through the lens of history’s rear-view mirror, but it seems safe to say that we are almost there now.

Comment by azdude
2016-02-06 12:33:51

DOOM and GLOOMER

San diego is built out

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 13:19:43

Just like Japan was built out before the onset of its quarter-century long real estate collapse beginning in 1990…

 
Comment by azdude
2016-02-06 13:51:26

Do the opposite of our resident cash hoarder GARTMAN JR

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-06 08:45:11

Thousands take part in anti-Islam protests across Europe

Feb 6, 9:43 AM EST

DRESDEN, Germany (AP) — Thousands of people are taking part in protests against Islam and immigration in several European cities.

Police in Dresden say they expect about 15,000 protesters at a rally organized by the group Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West. Known by its German acronym PEGIDA, the group emerged in Dresden two years ago and has become a magnet for far-right and anti-immigrant sentiment.

About 10,000 people are expected to take part in a counter-demonstration Saturday on the other side of the river Elbe, which divides the city.

Similar, smaller PEGIDA-style protests were planned in France, Britain, Poland, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-06 08:49:46

14 Year-Old Belgian Muslim Videotapes Migrants Gang Raping Drunk Girl

A 14 year-old Muslim boy recorded himself and 6 other “Migrants” gang raping a passed out girl in Belgium

Gateway Pundit | Andrew Marcus - February 6, 2016 44 Comments

How awful.

A 14 year-old Muslim boy recorded himself and 6 other “Migrants” gang raping a passed out girl in Belgium.

Five of the six suspects are Iraqi migrants.

Belgian police investigating a tip-off about the possible radicalization of a 14-year-old male student have discovered a video implicating him and six others in the gang rape of an unconscious girl. Five of the suspects are Iraqi immigrants.

The video was shot on a phone camera and reportedly shows the assailants laughing, singing and dancing around their victim, who has passed out after drinking too much alcohol. The men pulled the girl’s pants down then groped and raped her, police told the Belgian media.

Police officials in Ostend, Belgium’s largest coastal city, discovered the evidence of the sex crime as they were investigating a 14-year-old student of the Ostend Technical Institute, who had been seen showing his friends a photo of himself wearing military garb and holding a sub-machine gun. The gang rape video was found on the boy’s phone. [MORE…]

 
Comment by palmetto
2016-02-06 09:02:55

In other news, JEB! goes full retard and has Mumsy call out Trump. You can’t make this stuff up.

JEB! is either seriously delusional or on meds, maybe both. Even his donors are cringing at this point and praying he drops out.

I’m not a prayin’ type person, but Good Lord.

Comment by inchbyinch
2016-02-06 09:59:47

Yeah, it gave me a good chuckle as well. Jebi calls mommy to help him, and defend him against that big bad wolf. Trump is a meanie and Jeb is a yutz.

Granted, Trump might not be the most polished candidate, and an egomaniac, but he speaks his mind. The US is FUBAR (reason) and we all know it.

“Ted Cruz has an uncanny talent to twist and turn every single thought his clever brain has, then instantly converts these thoughts into a perfect piece of fabricated propaganda
by the time he is called on to respond to any questions asked of him. Cruz doesn’t reside in an alternate universe, but manages to make his “followers” believe they should.
Cruz is the King of Deranged and Misinformed”
A smart observer said this and I agree. He gives me the willies.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2016-02-06 15:42:57

jebs biggest moron idea was to drug test welfare recipients…..and he was part owner of the drug lab

just force welfare recipients to sit in class everyday and learn English for their ebt card no need for abusing them, let ‘em smoke that stinky weed they will fail soon enough.

 
Comment by phony scandals
2016-02-06 15:56:08

Barbara Bush: I’m ‘sick’ of Donald Trump

“I’m sick of him… that’s very strong”

Infowars.com - February 6, 2016 289 Comments

In an interview with CNN, former First Lady Barbara Bush, mother to presidential candidate “Jeb” Bush, reveals she doesn’t think much of her son’s opponent, billionaire Donald Trump.

“Mrs. Bush, what do you think about Donald Trump?,” a CNN reporter asks. “You are known for being blunt and plain spoken.”

“I don’t think about him at all,” replies Mrs. Bush.

In classic fashion, Trump shot back this morning quipping Jeb brought in “mommy” to slap him.

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Wow, Jeb Bush, whose campaign is a total disaster, had to bring in mommy to take a slap at me. Not nice!
9:37 AM - 6 Feb 2016

4,104 4,104 Retweets
10,961

Comment by rms
2016-02-07 00:05:00

“I don’t think about him at all,” replies Mrs. Bush.

The Donald likely hasn’t fantasized much about Barbara.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:01:16

Gasoline futures are under $1 / gallon. 1960s prices are on the way!

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 11:03:54

Marketwatch dot com
Oil futures lose more than 8% for the week
By Myra P. Saefong, Nicole Friedman, and Biman Mukherji
Published: Feb 5, 2016 3:13 p.m. ET
Gasoline futures end under $1 for first time since late 2008
Bloomberg

Oil futures posted a weekly loss of more than 8% on Friday, pressured by ongoing worries about a global glut of supplies, a lack of significant production cuts and some strength in the U.S. dollar on the heels of the U.S. jobs report.

Meanwhile, futures prices for gasoline finished under $1 a gallon for the first time since late 2008. Analysts attributed the drop to a purge of winter blends of the fuel.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2016-02-06 15:37:54

time to raise the gas tax…..oops ohbahma wants a $10 per barrel tax on all oil…

 
 
Comment by azdude
2016-02-06 11:16:06

who is gonna force shorts to cover next weeK?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-06 19:25:36

Business Day
Published On: Sat, Feb 6th, 2016
Breaking News / Main Story | By Editor
Lending to emerging markets comes to a halt

The surge in lending to emerging markets like Nigeria that helped fuel their own and much of the world’s growth over the past 15 years has come to a halt, and may now give way to a “vicious circle” of deleveraging, financial market turmoil and a global economic downturn, the Bank for International Settlements has warned….

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-07 00:44:08

ft dot com/global economy
February 5, 2016 6:30 pm
Lending to emerging markets comes to halt
Jonathan Wheatley
U.S. one-hundred dollar bills are arranged for a photograph in Hong Kong, China, on Monday, July 20, 2015. The yuan has proven to be among the more resilient emerging-market currencies this year, having fallen less than 0.1 percent versus the dollar as China cut interest rates and the U.S. prepared to raise.
Photographer: Xaume Olleros/Bloomberg
©Bloomberg

The surge in lending to emerging markets that helped fuel their own — and much of the world’s — growth over the past 15 years has come to a halt, and may now give way to a “vicious circle” of deleveraging, financial market turmoil and a global economic downturn, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.

In the risk-on phase [of the global economic cycle], lending sets off a virtuous circle in financial conditions in which things can look better than they really are,” said Hyun Song Shin, head of research at the BIS, known as the central bank of central banks. “But flows can quickly go into reverse and then it becomes a vicious circle, especially if there is leverage,” he told the FT.

That reversal has already taken place, according to BIS data released on Friday.

The total stock of dollar-denominated credit in bonds and bank loans to emerging markets — including that to governments, companies and households but excluding that to banks — was $3.33tn at the end of September 2015, down from $3.36tn at the end of June.

It marks the first decline in such lending since the first quarter of 2009, during the global financial crisis, according to the BIS.

The BIS data add to a growing pile of evidence pointing to tightening credit conditions in emerging markets and a sharp reversal of international capital flows. On Thursday, Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warned of the threat to global growth of an impending crisis in emerging markets.

The Institute of International Finance, an industry body, said last month that emerging markets had seen net capital outflows of an estimated $735bn during 2015, the first year of net outflows since 1988.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-07 01:34:57

Don’t be fooled by market calmness, warns Bank for International Settlements
6 December 2015 12:52pm
by Chris Papadopoullos

Financial markets still face a high level of vulnerability despite calming over recent months, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warned today.

The central bank watchdog said bank credit ratings have deteriorated further since 2010 in major advanced economies. BIS chief economist Claudio Borio said the fact bank shares traded at a discount to book values were a clear sign of “mistrust and scepticism”.

In the Eurozone especially, banks still have a high number of bad loans and balance sheet repair needs to pursued, he said.

Borio also pointed to low interest rates on government as a sign markets were not expecting central bank policy rates to policy rates to rise quickly in the US. He also said a third of government debt in the Eurozone had a negative interest rate – a new peak.

Under such extraordinary conditions, it is not surprising that markets remain unusually sensitive to central banks’ every word and deed. Just think of the market gyrations following the ECB’s [European Central Bank] decision to ease even further, but to an extent that fell short of market expectations,” Borio said in his introductory remarks to the BIS quarterly review.

Against this backdrop, it is hard to imagine how the calm could be anything but uneasy.”

There is a clear tension between the markets’ behaviour and underlying economic conditions. At some point, it will have to be resolved. Markets can remain calm for much longer than we think. Until they no longer can.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-07 01:28:21

Is oil the new subprime?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-02-07 01:30:15

Oil market spiral threatens to prick global debt bubble, warns BIS
An ‘illusion of sustainability’ has blinded borrowers and debtors, lulling them into a false of security. The BIS says liquidity is now drying up
Jaime Caruana, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements, addresses the participants of the XXIII International Banking Congress in St. Petersburg
Photo: EPA
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
6:33PM GMT 05 Feb 2016

The global oil industry is caught in a self-feeding downward spiral as falling prices cause producers to boost output even further in a scramble to service $3 trillion of dollar debt, the world’s top watchdog has warned.

The Bank for International Settlements fears that a perverse dynamic is at work where energy companies in Brazil, Russia, China and parts of the US shale belt are increasing production in defiance of normal market logic, leading to a bad “feedback-loop” that is sucking the whole sector into a destructive vortex.

“Lower prices have not removed excess capacity from the market, but instead may have exacerbated it. Production has been ramped up, rather than curtailed,” said Jaime Caruana, the general manager of the Swiss-based club for central bankers.

The findings raise serious questions about the strategy of Saudi Arabia and the core Opec states as they flood the global crude market to knock out rivals in a cut-throat battle for export share. The process of attrition may take far longer and do more damage than originally supposed.

Oil exporters are embracing austerity and slashing government spending, leading to a form of fiscal tightening that is slowing the global economy.

Speaking at the London School of Economics, Mr Caruana said the sheer scale of leverage in the oil and gas industry is amplifying the downturn since companies are attempting to eke out extra production to stay afloat. The risk spreads on high-yield energy bonds have jumped from 330 basis points to 1,600 over the past 18 months, amplifying the effects of the oil price crash itself.

The industry has issued $1.4 trillion of bonds and taken out a further $1.6 trillion in syndicated loans, driving up the combined energy debt threefold to $3 trillion in less than a decade.

While US shale frackers hog the limelight in the Anglo-Saxon press, many of these energy groups are giant “parastatals”, such as Rosneft, Petrobras or China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC).

The BIS said state-owned oil companies increased debt at annual rate of 13pc in Russia, 25pc in Brazil and 31pc in China between 2006 and 2014, much it in the form of dollar debt through offshore subsidiaries. These oil companies do not respond to pure market pressures since they are cash cows for government budgets.

The nexus of oil and gas debt is just one part of an over-stretched financial system, increasingly exposed to the dangers of a “maturing financial cycle” and to punishing moves in the global currency markets.

Mr Caruana said an “illusion of sustainability” has blinded borrowers and debtors, lulling them into a false of security when credit was easy and asset prices were rising. This illusion can die in the blink of an eye. “The turning of the financial cycle can be quite abrupt,” he said.

The BIS calculates that debt in US dollars outside the United States has surged to $9.8 trillion, a fivefold rise since 2000 and an unprecedented level for the global monetary system as a whole.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post