March 15, 2016

As The Fear Builds You Get A Herd Mentality

WNYC reports on New York. “Elegant new condominium towers of glass and steel are rising in neighborhoods all over the city. With some units costing tens of millions of dollars, many New Yorkers have come to regard these buildings as little more than piggy banks for the global super-rich. Now, the U.S. Treasury Department says it is concerned that luxury real estate is vulnerable to money laundering through all-cash sales to anonymous shell companies. Starting March 1st, Treasury will run a pilot program scrutinizing big-dollar purchases of property in Manhattan and Miami.”

“David Szuchman, chief of the investigation division at the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, expects the monitoring program to yield valuable information. ‘This would be one of the first attempts we have to be able to show that in a broad based way that cash is running through this city from crimes committed elsewhere, or in the United States,’ Szuchman said. ‘And nobody wants their buildings being bought up for that purpose, nobody wants dirty money being injected into Manhattan.’”

From NY Press. “The Bauhouse Group’s 900-foot condo project on Sutton Place is the latest luxury residential development to suffer from a lack of funding, as investors are increasingly wary of financing projects at the top end of the market due to a surplus in inventory and a tepid outlook on whether affluent buyers will materialize down the road. ‘There is a stall in the luxury market with too much product already,’ said Phillia Kim Downs, a luxury real estate broker with Brick and Mortar. ‘Real sellers are slashing prices across the board to compete with all the new developments out there.’”

“Downs said there was low inventory in the high-end market in 2013 and 2014, ‘but times have definitely changed.’”

Real Estate Weekly. “The growth of the ultra-luxury residential market in New York City has seen developers looking to top each other with more and more opulence. But lately, there have been signs that the price party might be over. ‘In New York City’s luxury tier, we’re already seeing prices decline,’ said Alan Lightfeldt, data scientist with StreetEasy.”

“‘As developers rushed to meet burgeoning global demand, luxury homes represented the vast majority of new product entering the market between 2014 and now. With demand beginning to wane, we’ve seen a considerable increase in the length of time that luxury units spend on the market – a reflection of oversupply at this end of the market – and prices among top-tier homes in Manhattan have actually declined each consecutive month since May 2015,’ he said.”

The New York Times. “For the ultrawealthy, 2015 was an embarrassment of riches. But after years of dizzying appreciation, the values of luxury assets are plateauing and in some cases plunging. Volumes have shrunk, prices are being cut and some auction lots are going unsold. ‘We’ve just come through a boom unlike anything I’ve experienced in 30 years in the business,’ Jonathan J. Miller, chief executive of Miller Samuel, a real estate appraisal and consulting firm, said of the market for high-end sales. ‘The hard asset buyers have all cooled at the same time.’”

“Rather suddenly, it seems, the voracious spending appetites of newly minted billionaires from Russia, Brazil and China have cooled off. In Manhattan, some sellers of luxury real estate have slashed prices. The asking price for a Park Avenue townhouse dropped $18.5 million, to just under $30 million; a seller cut the price for a Central Park South apartment by $7 million late last year, to below $18 million, and has since taken off another $2 million. Neither property has sold.”

“It appears the ultrarich are as vulnerable to the laws of supply and demand as everyone else. Despite auction catalog copy that stresses adjectives like ‘rare,’ ‘unique’ and ‘irreplaceable,’ the supply of luxury assets for sale has surged as prices have climbed into the stratosphere, driving down prices. On or near 57th Street, where developers are vying to build the world’s tallest residential apartment building, five major towers are in various stages of construction. ‘Now that all these towers are visible, and not just holes in the ground, people are realizing that there’s a lot of this kind of product coming on the market,’ Mr. Miller said.”

Crain’s New York. “New York City’s real estate market is showing telltale signs of slowing after an extraordinary three-year run. Among the recent string of sobering reports is news that a 10-story building in Brooklyn Heights will fetch a price 25% below the $300 million or more for which it was initially projected to sell. The parcels are considered prime places for both residential and commercial development. Brokers said the decrease mirrors a precipitous drop in the value of land sites in the city by 20% to 25% so far in 2016.”

“Tumbling land values, which had reached $1,000 or more per square foot for prime sites, are a reflection of the growing weakness in the city’s high-end residential market. Developers Joseph Beninati and Bruce Eichner are both facing foreclosure in Manhattan after failing to lock up the loans needed to begin building. As many as 20 other sites may be unable to secure construction financing, and may stall and face foreclosure, predicted Dennis Russo, who leads the real estate practice at law firm BakerHostetler in New York.”

“‘Until the middle of last year, no one was fearful, but today a higher percentage of people are,’ said Bob Knakal, Cushman & Wakefield’s chairman of New York investment sales. ‘Markets are psychological, and as the fear builds you get a herd mentality that comes into effect.’”




RSS feed

42 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-03-15 02:43:22

“New York City’s real estate market is showing telltale signs of slowing after an extraordinary three-year run. Among the recent string of sobering reports is news that a 10-story building in Brooklyn Heights will fetch a price 25% below the $300 million or more for which it was initially projected to sell. The parcels are considered prime places for both residential and commercial development. Brokers said the decrease mirrors a precipitous drop in the value of land sites in the city by 20% to 25% so far in 2016.”

It kind of sounds like the latest major crash is already well underway in the pricy NYC real estate bubble zone. Is this more likely to be openly acknowledged or conveniently ignored by the candidates in this U.S. presidential election year?

 
Comment by Mugsy
2016-03-15 03:14:44

The asking price for a Park Avenue townhouse dropped $18.5 million, to just under $30 million; a seller cut the price for a Central Park South apartment by $7 million late last year, to below $18 million, and has since taken off another $2 million. Neither property has sold.”

‘Markets are psychological, and as the fear builds you get a herd mentality that comes into effect.’”

Fearful of what? The fact that maybe someday a middle class family will be able to purchase real estate in NYC? $350,000 for a 750 sq/ft 1/1 in Rego Park, Queens. What the hell has this world come to?

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-15 04:08:51

$466/SF….. Cost about $4/SF/month to own.

Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 05:04:08

Now double it to account for taxes, insurance and depreciation and fees.

Rent it for half the monthly cost. And remember….. A house is a depreciating asset that costs the owner money every day he owns it.

 
Comment by Mugsy
2016-03-16 02:54:31

Add in the approximately $800 a month “association” fee and and you have a beautiful 30 year package of joy.

 
 
Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 04:11:25

Not sure there is a whole lot of interest in living in these areas. These cities are crime ridden welfare holes.

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 04:44:50

‘Fearful of what’

‘Developers Joseph Beninati and Bruce Eichner are both facing foreclosure in Manhattan after failing to lock up the loans needed to begin building. As many as 20 other sites may be unable to secure construction financing, and may stall and face foreclosure’

Some people take it harder than others. A newly minted billionaire drove into a wall in Oklahoma the other day.

Comment by redmondjp
2016-03-15 10:17:46

Are you referring to Aubrey McClendon?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 10:28:21

Yeah, I read a long article about him the other day, Reuters I think. I didn’t realize that he was kind of a giant in the fracking world. He made a ton of money and apparently lost it all.

 
Comment by Ethan in Northern VA
2016-03-15 13:37:57

I thought he was convicted of criminal activity.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-15 14:42:07

He was charged with criminal activity…..he convicted himself when he drove into the wall.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-15 14:49:01

…although I don’t think the feds had the death penalty option on the table….

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 14:58:51

If he had money he could have fought that out. I read about these suicides a lot in the 80’s. Flying high, then bam. I always felt like it was the person couldn’t accept the reversal of what they felt would be riches until the day they died. This guy went from super successful to begging for investment money in a year and a half.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-17 00:48:54

I had a reversal of fortune in 1990-1995. It was one of the most humbling experiences of my life. It is why I learned to be cautious, conservative and prepared for the down cycles. They always come!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 04:20:45

‘a precipitous drop in the value of land sites in the city by 20% to 25% so far in 2016′

And it’s only March!

‘The hard asset buyers have all cooled at the same time.’…Rather suddenly, it seems, the voracious spending appetites of newly minted billionaires from Russia, Brazil and China have cooled off.’

Newly minted. Ya hear that Janet? These articles are worth reading, especially the NYT.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-03-15 08:14:17

Too bad the BRIC consonants all tanked concurrently (not sure about India, but I don’t know that newly-minted Indian billionaires drove up NYC prices…).

 
 
Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 04:22:53

1989 here we come.

Did you prepare?

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-03-15 18:34:49

What specifically happened in 1989 that’s happening again now?

Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 19:19:34

Japan imploded and lost their ass on US RE assets.

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-17 00:53:42

You are off by a few years…..they didn’t even buy pebble Beach until 1990!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 04:31:59

‘Brooklyn Supreme Court faces backlog of nearly 12,000 foreclosure cases’

‘Nearly a decade after the start of America’s historic housing crash, the nightmare continues for forgotten homeowners behind in their mortgage. The list of pending home foreclosures before Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Noach Dear was enough to take your breath away.’

“The old way wasn’t working,” Knipel told the Daily News.’

‘That’s because foreclosures have mushroomed into more than a third of all civil cases in New York state courts. More than 41,000 new ones were filed statewide last year. That’s not a whole lot less than the 47,000 filed at the height of the housing collapse in 2009.’

‘And more the 60% of the state’s foreclosure cases are concentrated in four downstate counties, including Brooklyn and Queens. Along one wall of Dear’s courtroom, a row of 10 big metal cabinets are filled with case documents. Mountains of newly arriving files are piled on top.’

“We get a truckload of these every day, and we’re handling it,” said Dear, who has scheduled an average of 100 cases a day. “My goal is to issue decisions on all motions within two weeks of their being filed,” Dear said.’

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 04:40:55

‘the supply of luxury assets for sale has surged as prices have climbed into the stratosphere, driving down prices’

Funny how that works.

 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-03-15 04:41:37

New York City, NY Real Estate and Homes for Sale-60,393 properties found

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/New-York-City_NY/radius-20?pos=40.206283,-74.651205,41.204766,-73.289008

New York City, NY Price Reduced Homes for Sale-16,358 properties found

http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/New-York-City_NY/radius-20/show-price-reduced?pos=40.206283,-74.651205,41.204766,-73.289008

26% of of NY city area sellers cut their price at least once.

Comment by taxpayers
2016-03-15 12:59:38

this ratio of price cutters seems to fall in 20% to 40% no matter what market you pick
except Portland ………..

Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 13:38:07

Everyones slashing the price. Makes sense.

Keep slashing because today’s price is the best price you’ll get for decades to come.

 
 
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-03-15 04:47:53

Manhattan Housing Market Craters; Prices Cave 7% YoY

http://www.zillow.com/new-york-ny-10003/home-values/

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 06:15:40

‘Speaking at the festival South by Southwest, Under Armour CEO Kevin Plank argued that profitability is one of the most undersold things in tech. At a tech conference the previous week, the Under Armour CEO watched as startup CEOs joked about the lack of profitability, and the crowd chuckled at it.’

‘Plank, though, was shocked.’

“And I’m going, what are you doing? Winning is cultural. Losing money is cultural. If you get used to losing money, it’s really hard to stop,” Plank said. “Go let the other guy lose money and fail off.”

‘For many young companies, especially in Silicon Valley, being unprofitable is considered a right of passage. Companies can burn through cash as they build a great product, and making money comes only after testing for a good fit. Twitter, one of the best examples, has been public for more than two years and has never been profitable.’

A comment:

‘This mindset is similar to cc debt and living beyond your means in a house you can’t afford. You are banking on someone else buying you out, either in your job (promotion) or your house (selling for a profit). And yes, it is really hard to break that cycle because you get used to the emotions and the lifestyle and nothing bad has happened to these people to warrant a change.’

I’m shocked too Kevin. I can remember the trillion$ lost by “investors” the last time we all chuckled at money losing stocks with grow to the sky prices. I don’t know why there would be one IPO with a money loser, much less several.

At least Worldcom lied to people. Now you just come out with a dog and people throw Yellen bucks at you. Then as a newly minted billionaire, you can send more money to heaven buying sky boxes and rosewood furniture.

Comment by Sean
2016-03-15 09:56:08

That’s a great point Ben. Now replace “Tech companies” with humans, and I hear that same nervous laughter with some friends and their “profitability”. One friend is in debt to his eyeballs (with a mortgage and student loans and such) and laughs about how little he saves or manages his money. Since when was it funny to outspend your earnings? Since when was it funny to put your family in this kind of financial danger?

Comment by Neuromance
2016-03-15 17:32:48

Because the current social paradigm is geared towards living in debt and living hand-to-mouth. This is encouraged by policy makers. People who avoid debt, have moderate savings are considered the problem and are constantly threatened by new financial policy proposals.

Another example: I run a business on the side. Every dollar is taxed. If I flipped a house, up to 250K profit would be tax free. What is that encouraging? Right, a society in which we’d continue flipping houses to each other and all get rich, but not really.

So, being heavily invested in stocks, having a lot of debt, and spending as much as you can - this is the desired model by policy makers from what I see.

Why would this be? Our political and financial policy is almost completely determined by the FIRE sector. FIRE sector consists of people. People act in their interests. Politicians were too willing to sell themselves for cash, and what used to be bribery is now legalized standard operating procedure.

 
 
Comment by taxpayers
2016-03-15 13:01:51

I though the unicorns were dying now

 
 
Comment by Dutch Spikes
2016-03-15 07:53:14

“Yellen bucks” :)

Comment by Combotechie
2016-03-15 08:23:57

A quick peek inside the mind of Janet Yellen …

From Wikipedia:

“In a 1995 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee while serving on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Yellen stated that occasionally letting inflation rise could be a “wise and humane policy” if it increases output. At the same meeting she also stated that each percentage point reduction in inflation results in a 4.4 percent loss of Gross Domestic Product.”

A one point reduction in inflation reduces GDP by 4.4 percent. Got that?

So, does it follow that raising inflation by one percent will magically cause GDP to rise up 4.4 percent?

How about a two percent rise? A five percent rise?

Comment by Combotechie
2016-03-15 08:46:37

Are rising prices a result of rising demand or is rising demand a result of rising prices?

If you are Janet Yellen then apparently you think that rising prices will raise demand.

How about falling prices; Do prices fall because demand has fallen or does demand fall because prices have fallen?

Econ 101 says lowering prices will increase demand but a Janet Yellen market raising prices will increase demand, and apparently the opposite is true as well.

Comment by taxpayers
2016-03-15 13:03:02

1921 is my favorite year

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 14:51:15

She’s a sick woman. A sick sick woman.

Comment by redmondjp
2016-03-15 15:50:08

But she’s a pawn, like most politicians and agency heads. So long as she carries out the orders, itsallgood.

Got an email this morning that one of the leaders in my gov agency used the revolving door back into a cushy private-industry (and government contractor) job.

It’s the American Way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jake
2016-03-15 16:10:17

She is no pawn my friend.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-03-15 10:40:41

Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (VRX) -NYSE
36.05 Down 32.99(47.78%) 1:35PM EDT

52wk Range: 35.00 - 263.81

Market Cap: 12.43B
P/E (ttm): 20.64
EPS (ttm): 1.74
Div & Yield: N/A (N/A)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=VRX

What do you call it when a billionaire becomes a non-billionaire? Newly de-minted billionaire?

Comment by Jingle Male
2016-03-15 14:47:49

an aire ball…..

 
 
Comment by Karen
 
Comment by Senior Housing Analyst
2016-03-15 16:25:41

Falls Church, VA Housing Market Implodes As Prices Plunge 9% YoY

http://www.zillow.com/falls-church-va-22042/home-values/

 
Comment by Puggs
2016-03-16 13:50:35

A pest control business owner and wifey photographer +3 kids buys a 1.5 Million home in Long Beach.

Is it 2006 again?…nope, it’s 2016.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post