September 1, 2016

The Slashing Is Remarkable

The National Post reports from Canada. “Less than a month after the B.C. government imposed a 15-per-cent tax on foreign buyers of residential real estate, sellers of a handful of multi-million mansions have slashed their asking price, in one case by millions. The slashing of the asking price on some high-end residences in exclusive neighbourhoods after the tax came into affect on Aug. 2 is remarkable. The biggest drop is $2.3 million on a Shaughnessy mansion. The owner adjusted the asking price to $16.5 million from $18.8 million on Aug. 23, three weeks after the tax became law, according to Zolo Realty, which tracks real estate data and publishes it in real time at zolo.com. That’s a 12.5-per-cent discount on the building at 1637 Angus Dr. that has been on the market for at least four months, according to Zolo.”

“The asking price for a ‘concrete modern mansion’ at 1708 Western Parkway at UBC dropped by $1.9 million, to $11 million, or 18 per cent, on Aug. 9, according to Zolo. ‘As a result of the uncertainty caused by the new tax, we are seeing this exact reaction in the high-end market, sellers putting their homes on market to see what they can get, but buyers are waiting to see the impact on prices before they commit,’ said Zolo CEO Barry Allen. The result is increased supply and dropping demand.”

From CBC News. “Sales of single family homes dropped by half last month across several parts of Metro Vancouver, but it’s too early to call a long-term cooling trend, says one industry expert. Nancy Beaton, the president of SnapStats, says one of the most interesting insights from the data is for the first time in three years, the West Side of Vancouver is ‘officially a buyer’s market’ for detached homes.”

“Beaton says if the tax has had any effect, it has been to hit the pause button on many deals. ‘Everyone is waiting to see. Should I buy? Should I sell? It is a bit paralyzed now.’”

The Victoria News. “Tony Joe, a realtor in Victoria and the president of the Asian Real Estate Association of America’s Vancouver chapter, said so far the implementation of the 15 per cent tax on foreign buyers in Vancouver has had little impact on the local housing market. However, he believes that will potentially change in the fall. Since the tax was implemented on Aug. 2, Joe said there has been a scare in Vancouver for buyers and sellers who wrote offers three or four months ago and have closing dates set for September or October.”

“‘They remain uncertain that they’re going to sell because they know that they have a foreign buyer and is that foreign buyer able to get their 15 per cent?’ said Joe, who specializes in foreign investors. ‘When asking buyers ‘are you going to be able to close’? They’re not able to give clarity. It’s a pretty significant grey area right now that are keeping a lot of people on their toes.’”

“However, if buyers choose to back out before the closing date, both parties will be left in the lurch. Buyers who back out of the sale because of the tax could face legal ramifications, lose their deposits, which are typically sizeable, or they could be sued. It would also impact the seller, who would need to seek legal remedy. ‘The implementation of the tax has really put a lot of people in a bad position,’ said Joe.”

The Calgary Herald. “While Calgary home sales were down year-over-year for a 21st consecutive month in August, with the biggest pains felt in the condo apartment and attached categories, according to the latest report from the Calgary Real Estate Board. ‘While overall sales have eased for detached homes, so too has the amount of new listings on the market preventing inventories from reaching previous highs and limiting the downward pressure on pricing,’ said Ann-Marie Lurie, CREB’s chief economist, in the report. ‘This is not the case in both the attached and apartment sectors which have recorded inventory levels near August highs.’”

From CTV News Calgary. “New figures released by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation indicate that the number of mortgages in arrears in the province is up over 50 percent over last year. The CMHC says that almost 1,500 Albertans are struggling to pay for their homes and could soon have them taken from them. Earlier in August, CTV Calgary spoke with 71-year-old Peter Janzen and his wife Sharon. The couple had taken out a $375,000 mortgage to finish renovations on their home, but when Peter became ill and couldn’t work, they couldn’t make the monthly payments anymore.”

“They’ve now missed four mortgage payments and their home has been put into foreclosure. ‘With no money, it’s just out of the question to pay those kinds of payments,’ Peter Janzen said.”

“Faisal Karmali, a financial expert, says there isn’t much you can do if you’ve missed multiple mortgage payments, but you can be prepared. ‘Those who have equity in their home might want to look at getting a line of credit against your home right away because you may need that as emergency cash reserve if you don’t have enough.’”

“Meanwhile, the Janzens have put their home up for sale. ‘I knew at my age, the only way out would be to get rid of the house,’ Janzen said. They know that without the sale, homelessness could be a reality.”




RSS feed

46 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 15:39:28

‘I knew at my age, the only way out would be to get rid of the house,’ Janzen said. They know that without the sale, homelessness could be a reality.’

These housing bubbles are all fun until somebody loses an eye.

Comment by MacBeth
2016-09-01 16:11:41

Pardon my French, but…

What the f*** are they thinking? Take out $375K at age 71 and not be able to pay the tab after a few months of no income?

Egad.

I don’t know how people live their life that way, always on the edge.

It seems these two have had a free ride their entire lives, courtesy of demographics. Nothing else could explain such an utter lack of knowledge, sense and ethics after 70 years of living.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:22:27

It seems these two have had a free ride their entire lives, courtesy of demographics. Nothing else could explain such an utter lack of knowledge, sense and ethics after 70 years of living.

WIth notable exceptions, Boomers are the most feckless generation to ever appear on the face of this planet. You didn’t really expect them to get wise in their old age, did you?

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 16:25:01

This is the problem with these countries that supposedly didn’t have a bubble a few years back, had a little downturn then took right back off, like Australia. The back to back booms made them greedy and complacent. This couple probably felt they were never going to pay that loan. They would sell for a big profit and let the buyer pay the loan to boot.

375,000 Canadian pesos? Was there an indoor heated Olympic sized pool involved?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:28:28

The Boomers installed a corrupt political class in power and didn’t lift a finger as the corporate statists and oligarchs off-shored our manufacturing base and decent jobs, but now they’re boo-hooing as they get set to retire into this oligarch-looted wasteland. Hey Boomer idiots, you reap what you vote.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/09/01/retirement/sIRT23m4MHGkEwXaP8YB9H/story.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by azdude
2016-09-01 17:00:27

SLASH TILL YOU CANT SLASH NO MORE! GET AHEAD OF THE OTHER SLASHERS!

 
Comment by Rental Watch
2016-09-02 09:36:51

You might be interested in this book that is coming out next year:

https://www.amazon.com/Generation-Sociopaths-Boomers-Betrayed-America/dp/0316395781

The guy writing it was a former partner of Peter Thiel at Founder’s Fund.

 
 
 
Comment by alphonso bedoya
2016-09-01 17:47:29

Who qualified him for the $375K loan? Who in the bank told him it was doable ?

Also—If you are older than seventy and live in a fairly sheltered environment you probably still trust and believe the experts in tailored suits.

“Mr.Janzen, may I get you a cup of of our freshly brewed coffee ?”

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 20:43:03

If you’re over seventy and can’t pay cash, just don’t buy a house. On second thought, don’t ever buy a house if you are over seventy years old unless you happen to

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 20:52:08

…be so flush that a home purchase is throwaway money.

 
Comment by Jingle Male
2016-09-02 03:01:22

Exactly. By the time you are 70, you should be retiring debt….or it will retire you.

 
Comment by alphonso bedoya
2016-09-02 07:53:26

And the bank has no responsibility? Really? It’s called: “Sins of Omission.” You really want to have a Social Contract built solely on caveat emptor? We f-d the young and we f-d the old with that mind-set this past decade.
Pharmaceutical drugs have disclaimers. My physician spends a good ten minutes telling me the side-effects. Do banks do the same? Should they be required to do so? You think the entire responsibility rests on the shoulders of the consumer?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:25:13

Meanwhile, future generations are being saddled with crippling unpayable debts thanks to the profligacy of our worthless Congress and Obama’s fiscal irresponsibility. Remember when he blasted Bush on the floor of Congress for HIS deficit spending?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/national-debt-hits-19.5-trillion/article/2600823

 
Comment by Puggs
2016-09-01 16:27:44

‘Those who have equity in their home might want to look at getting a line of credit against your home right away because you may need that as emergency cash reserve if you don’t have enough.’”

That right there is some funny chit!!!

 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:30:54

Meanwhile, in a vote of no-confidence in Obama, Hillary, and the collectivist kleptocrats, Americans are gunning up like never before. When Hillary gets elected, the panic buying of guns and ammunition is going to be insane.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-01/smith-wesson-forecasts-record-quarterly-revenue-earnings-soar-93

Comment by Mr. Beaver
2016-09-01 17:20:12

Easy to play along, just place your bets…..heck use your margin account, buy options!

Comment by MacBeth
2016-09-01 17:24:22

Otiose.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 17:44:21

Nothing seems more ironic to me than some goober who clings to his gun and Bible, while bending over for the Oligopoly election after election by voting for its Republicrat water carriers. You can’t fix stupid.

 
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-09-01 18:51:09

Bunch of terrified wusses, afraid to go outside unarmed. Nice arsenal, but you only got two hands to shoot with. More than that makes you a sweet prize for robbers.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:33:35

The Keynesian fraudsters at the central banks will not be gifting free “stimulus” on the proles. Those trillions are reserved for the already super-wealthy.

http://wolfstreet.com/2016/09/01/no-free-money-for-all-only-corporations-governments-consumers-need-not-apply-ecbs-nowotny/

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 16:46:09

‘In July, Germany has sold €4 billion of 10-year bonds with a zero-percent coupon and at a price above face value. This guarantees that investors, such as pension funds that have to buy these bonds, will never receive any interest payments. And if they hold the bond to maturity, they’re guaranteed a capital loss – not counting the losses due to inflation of the 10-year period.’

‘Central banks have made financial repression their policy. The cash flow of savers has gotten destroyed long ago. Pension funds are next.’

This is why pension funds are going into luxury student housing and the like. Sure, those rich renters and students are just dying to pay a fortune to have a bocci ball court! Why isn’t this a front page scandal?

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 17:42:47

‘Central banks have made financial repression their policy. The cash flow of savers has gotten destroyed long ago. Pension funds are next.’

Financial repression isn’t their policy. Financial warfare against the 99% on behalf of their oligarch masters is the central banksters’ policy.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 20:51:02

MarketWatch
Opinion: Here’s evidence the Fed is unlikely to raise interest rates before Election Day
By Mark Hulbert
Published: Sept 1, 2016 4:24 p.m. ET
The Fed’s history suggests that increases at this year’s September and November meetings probably won’t happen
Bloomberg News
Janet Yellen, chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve.
(Correction: An earlier version of this story erroneously reported that, since 1990, the Fed has never raised the fed funds rate in the two months prior to a presidential election. There was one exception, in September 2004.)

Does the Federal Reserve play politics? You could just as well ask if the Pope is Catholic.

Investors should be wondering about the Fed’s politics because its interest-rate-setting committee will meet two more times before Election Day — Sept. 20-21 and Nov. 1-2.

What the Fed decides to do at those meetings could have enormous political consequences, if you assume that a rate hike would cause the stock market to fall, and that a higher stock market would translate into better odds for the Democratic Party. Both assumptions have strong historical support.

 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 16:38:56

The Comrades of Proven Worth who have established collectivist kleptocracies have no intention of giving up their lucrative corruption rackets against the nation and its people. A preview of coming attractions once Comrade Hillary seizes the levers of power thanks to her permanent Democrat supermajority. Forward!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/venezuela-caracas-march-opposition-anti-government-president-nicolas-maduro-takeover-a7220461.html

 
Comment by azdude
2016-09-01 16:58:16

WE NEED MORE QE TO PUT PEOPLE TO WORK FROM TRICKLE DOWN STOCK GAINS OF THE RICH.

Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 17:45:30

The Fed is giving the brain-dead fools who voted for Obama, McCain, and Romney exactly the kind of reaming they voted for.

 
 
Comment by Mr. Beaver
 
Comment by Mr. Beaver
2016-09-01 17:43:14

See mexico speech:

If you’re running for president, you should not be allowed to use a teleprompter.
Donald Trump, August 2015

Comment by Professor Bear
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 19:57:32

She’s<- a mass murderer. It’s not really that hard to understand.

Comment by NYchk
2016-09-03 08:18:19

Yeah, ’cause the rule of blood-soaked gangsters like in Russia will be so much better.

Trump - your friendly neighborhood sociopath.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Raymond K Hessel
2016-09-01 20:36:28

That’s the thing that bothers me the most about Trump. Mexico is our neighbor; we should be treating Mexico and Mexicans with neighborly consideration and respect, not like a high-handed caricature of the Ugly American. That doesn’t mean we can’t tackle tough issues like NAFTA and border security, but pandering to some of the most base tendencies in the population isn’t helpful and it isn’t presidential.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 20:53:48

Fully agreed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 20:57:02

‘we should be treating Mexico and Mexicans with neighborly consideration and respect’

Mexico is a brutish class based society that is ruled by globalists. To heck with them and the horse they rode in on. I’m so sick of all this back washing crap about Trump. “Oh, he’s not perfect, he insulted someone.” What about President “I’m good at killing people” or the mass murdering Clinton?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by redmondjp
2016-09-02 01:00:28

Exactly! It’s not like Mexico treats us with the utmost respect.

Look how they treat illegal immigrants in their country. The least we could do would be to do the same.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 22:21:04

Politics
Who’s winning, who’s losing, and why.
Sept. 1 2016 6:34 PM
How Trump Made a Fool out of Mexico
President Enrique Peña Nieto committed an historic error.
By Enrique Krauze
President of Mexico Enrique Pena Nieto and US Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump attend a meeting at Los Pinos presidential residence, in Mexico City, Mexico on August 31, 2016.
Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and Donald Trump shake hands at Los Pinos presidential residence in Mexico City on Wednesday.
Daniel Cardenas/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

It was a theatrical work with two simultaneous performances. One was staged against the scenery of the American campaign for president; the other unfolded within the Mexican political arena. There were two actors: candidate Donald Trump and President Enrique Peña Nieto. Trump was trying to soften his image with undecided American voters and perhaps persuade some Latino Americans to support him, to see him as presidential and friendly toward Mexicans, all without alienating his committed followers and all while not yielding an inch on his wall and deportation agenda. Peña Nieto, more unpopular in his country than Trump is in his, was trying to “protect” Mexicans in Mexico itself and in the United States. There was only one winner, Donald Trump, and one loser, Peña Nieto. Or, more precisely, Peña Nieto and the people of Mexico.

 
 
Comment by Panda Triste
Comment by The Central Scrutinizer
2016-09-01 18:53:11

Idiocracy is barreling down on us.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 21:52:16

“Bossie is the president of Citizens United, a conservative group that is best known for its namesake lawsuit that opened the door to political spending from corporations, nonprofits and other organizations.”

Which one is the anti-establishment candidate?

 
 
Comment by MacBeth
2016-09-01 19:00:44

BEN -

Saw the tornado commentary in the other thread. A really interesting youtube video to watch on said topic:

From this year, Katie, Oklahoma. Among the best footage I’ve ever seen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phEZbzbzyVA

Comment by Ben Jones
2016-09-01 19:29:44

It’s good video, but those guys are kinda crazy. I would never want to be that close to one. In my hometown there was a big tornado in the 70’s. I read many accounts. One said the rescuers found a piece of straw which had struck through a telephone pole.

Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 19:57:02

Twisters can do almost unimaginable damage by turning ordinary objects into projectiles travelling at speeds over 300 mph.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 21:06:56

Footage is amazing, but those guys are playing with fire. That close to a twister, a slight change of direction of the storm could end the video shoot in a heartbeat.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2016-09-01 22:47:00

‘Everyone is waiting to see. Should I buy? Should I sell? It is a bit paralyzed now.’

CR8R

 
Comment by Palm Beach County
2016-09-02 04:55:36

We’ve Reached the “Zero Point” of Debt Creation
by Harry Dent • September 1, 2016

Hurtling toward a massive financial crisis.

By Harry Dent, Senior Editor, Economy & Markets:

http://wolfstreet.com/2016/09/01/weve-reached-the-zero-point-of-debt-creation/

 
Comment by azdude
2016-09-02 05:00:45

It seems the elites have takn control over all the markets?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post