Taxing The Housing Bubble
Several readers have taxes on their minds this weekend. “Well, Monday is tax day, so I’d like to see a discussion on how the current tax structure subsidizes the real estate industry and what impact a national sales tax or so-called ‘fair tax’ would have on the housing bubble. A national sales tax appeals to me since I think it would capture tax revenue from sectors that were not previously taxed. Also it would simplify compliance which would free up some very smart people to think about better things than tax avoidance. Finally, business decisions would be made based on factors other than taxes, hence create efficiencies in our overall economy.”
Another replied, “You used ‘fair’ and ‘tax’ in the same sentence. Thus no productive discussion is possible. Taxes ‘distort’ the real estate sector and we could have a thread about that.”
One targeted housing deductions. “If there was no interest tax dedection for homes, home prices would be lower. Imagine if the government had never started the deduction. A few people benefited at first, but then the housing prices rose to the point that it was a wash because everyone took the deduction into consideration in the price they were willing to pay for a home, just like they do now. Every time the government does something to ‘increase’ home ownership the result is that home prices go up and certain people profit from the change and then others from the rise in price.”
“The tax problem is a pet peeve of mine. National sales tax (consumption tax) is the only ‘fair’ way to impose taxation. Those who consume pay more. Those who grow their own food, economize, don’t buy monster plasma televisions and McMansions, and are otherwise conscientious, responsible, rational citizens pay less. Beauty.”
Another had a local take. “On the local level, I would like to see tax reform that separates property tax from home valuations. For example, have a set property tax rate that is based on lot size or some other static feature, which increases with inflation (or another set formula) rather than property values. Then impose a local capital gains tax upon sale of the property.”
“This way, homeowners won’t get taxed out of their homes due to forces beyond their control, but the local governments would still benefit from increasing property values. As a side benefit, it would also discourage flipping.”
And My San Antonio has this taxing story. “Driven by economic growth and a white-hot housing market, the value of property in Bexar County jumped 13 percent this year, to $81 billion, a bittersweet fact that will be reflected in homeowners’ mailboxes next week.”
“Mary Kieke, the district’s deputy chief appraiser, believes the greater wealth for homeowners is worth celebrating, even though it means higher taxes. ‘It’s definitely a double-edged sword,’ Kieke said. ‘But I’m excited for San Antonio. It ought to celebrate its increased wealth, the dynamic market and growing economy.’”
“Janie Medellin owns six homes in the neighborhood just east of Roosevelt Park on the city’s near South Side. Medellin, 80, who collects rent on just three of her homes, family members live in the others, says her valuations ‘have gone up something terrible. Why do they go up every year?’ she asks. ‘I don’t live in a famous neighborhood.’”