“Back To Basic Economics” For California
The San Francisco Chronicle reports from California. “For all the talk of a housing slowdown, almost 97 percent of people who sold Bay Area homes in November got more than they paid for their properties, according to a new report. The report, from First American Real Estate Solutions, attempts to quantify the profit realized on home sales, not including any money the owners spent on improvements.”
“What the new report does not show is how much equity homeowners have extracted from their houses prior to sale, either by taking out a second mortgage or doing a cash-out refinancing.”
“Christopher Cagan, director of research with First American, says economists and others are also interested in the percentage of homes sold at a loss. Most homeowners are extremely reluctant to sell at a loss, and an increase in this number would be an ominous sign for the housing market and the economy.”
“In the Bay Area, these numbers are still low, ranging from 1.7 percent in Napa County (unchanged from October) to 5.6 percent in Marin County (up from 1.6 percent in October).”
“In Southern California, homes sold at a loss ranged from 1 percent in Los Angeles County to 6.2 percent in San Diego County. The condo market in San Diego County is even worse, with 10.8 percent of units being sold at a loss in November.”
“‘In downtown San Diego, you have lots and lots of condo construction, more than they could turn over. As a result, you have people slashing prices,’ Cagan says. (First American did not study condo profits in the Bay Area.)”
“Cagan says, homeowners should not expect to see the same outsized gains they’ve gotten in recent years. Long term, in the Bay Area and Southern California, housing appreciates only 3.5 percentage points a year over the rate of inflation, he says.”
“During the housing slowdown of the early 1990s, things were worse. In 1992, almost 24 percent of Southern California homes and condos were sold at a loss, according to figures from Dataquick.”
“Of course that recession was caused by a sharp drop in employment. Today, the job market in California is strong.”
The Orange County Register. “Last year’s slowdown in new home construction in California is expected to continue well into 2007 as builders grapple with excess inventory, a statewide housing forecast issued this morning says.”
“Alan Nevin, chief economist for the California Building Industry Association, projected that housing starts for single-family houses, condominiums and apartments should total from 155,000 to 170,000 this year.”
“That compares to construction levels exceeding 200,000 units a year in the period preceding a housing slump that gripped the state last year.”
“Orange’s Ameriquest, buffetted by litigation woes and talk of a pending sale, didn’t crack a Top 10 list of the busiest lenders nationwide for the third quarter in its key niche: making subprime mortgages.”
“Ameriquest had come in eighth in 2006’s second quarter at $7.2 billion of subprime lending vs. $10 billion in the previous year, according to National Mortgage News. Ameriquest was the nation’s top subprime lender by this count as recently as 2005’s first quarter with $11.6 billion. Back in the third quarter of 2004, it made $19 billion in subprime loans.”
“Irvine’s New Century ranked second in 2006’s third quarter with $13.8 billion in subprime deals, according to NMN. That’s down from $16.7 billion in 2005’s third quarter.”
“Irvine’s Option One ranked sixth in subprime lending, making $7.9 billion in deals in 2006’s third quarter. That’s down from $12.1 billion in the previous year.”
“It wasn’t too long ago, back In 2005’s third quarter, that Orange County dominated this niche with New Century ranked #1 in new loans followed by Ameriquest (#2) and Option One (#4).”
“Your O.C. home just lost some sales oomph. ‘The O.C.’ has been axed. The economic loss ain’t silly talk. The O.C.’s glamorous edge made this town look hip. And that sells everything from T-shirts (which we design here) to our homes. Now it’s back to basic economics for us.”