June 6, 2010

Bits Bucket For June 6, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. The Florida/DC meetup link at the forum is here. Click here for the shadow inventory thread.

Please consider signing the Shadow Inventory petition.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

230 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-06-06 03:25:16

The petition comment of the day:

‘The current strategy of allowing banks to hold inventory of REO and slowly book losses to stay solvent is only serving to transfer wealth at a faster rate between the middle class and the financial elite.’

http://shadowinv.epetitions.net/

Comment by dude
2010-06-07 10:57:50

Woo hoo! I made the cut.

 
Comment by SoarZion
2010-06-07 19:36:02

And sometimes the courts will help with that. link
http://www.thespectrum.com/article/20100607/NEWS05/100607011/1002/rss

 
 
Comment by mugsy
2010-06-06 03:58:16

Cyprus unemployment climbs for 21st straight month

June 06, 2010 - http://www.financialmirror.com

Unemployment in Cyprus continued its relentless climb in May, rising by 5,425 or 35.8% compared with May 2009, having risen by 34.3% in April.
The annual increase was mainly recorded in the sectors of construction (an increase of 976), wholesale and retail trade (944), public administration (858), manufacturing (545), hotels and restaurants (495), real estate and business activities (443), as well as newcomers in the labour market where an increase of 451 was recorded.
The total number of registered unemployed was 20,583 persons.
According to the Statistical Service, on a seasonally adjusted basis, unemployment rose by 3.2% compared with the previous month.
According to the most recent Labour Force Survey, which includes not only the registered unemployed but all those seeking work, the unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of 2009 was 6%.

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-06-06 07:00:44

Thanks for the info, mugsy, but why should we be upset that unemployment is up to 6% in Cyprus?

Comment by mugsy
2010-06-06 07:22:22

I live here and they’ve imported tons of immigrant labor from Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, etc. These folks no longer have work here but they can’t pay to go home so they hang around Cyprus, drink and generally don’t contribute.

That 6% figure is deceiving as most of the jobs that were lost were in construction and tourism which employs mostly immigrant labor. Sort of like unemployed immigrants from south of the US border. Oh, the Cypriots are too good to do the tourist and construction jobs so they import. Sound familiar?

 
 
 
Comment by mugsy
2010-06-06 04:05:09

Cyprus tourism revenue fell sharply in April

May 28, 2010 - http://www.financialmirror.com

Cyprus tourism revenue fell sharply in April, according to the results of the Passenger Survey.
Revenue from tourism fell by 17.1% to EUR 89.0 mln compared with EUR 107.4 mln in the corresponding month of the previous year.
In the same month, tourism arrivals fell by 23%, depressed by flight delays and cancellations as a result of volcanic ash.
For the period January - April 2010 revenue from tourism is estimated at EUR 218.2 mln, down 6.1% from the EUR 232.3 mln recorded in the corresponding period of 2009.

Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 04:31:23

From http://www/state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5376.htm

“In the past 20 years, the (Cyprus) economy has shifted from agriculture and light manufacturing to services. Currently, agriculture makes up only 2.4% of the GDP and employs 7.5% of the labor force. Industry and construction contribute 19.0% and employ 20.4% of the labor force. The service sector, including tourism, contributes 78.6% to the GDP and employs 72.1% of the labor force.”

Cyprus: Canary in the coal mine?

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 07:12:38

Perhaps Mediterranean tourism will pick up after all our beaches are covered in oil.

 
Comment by mugsy
2010-06-06 07:24:38

Techie: Just keep this amongst us cash hoarders but…the tourists are not showing up on Cyprus this year! They’re mostly Brits/Germans and some of them have told me they can go to Spain for 1/2 the price they pay here :)

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 08:19:14

If they can fly in and out between volcano eruptions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DennisN
2010-06-06 09:33:57

The Brits/Germans can get to Spain via surface transit (e.g. train through the Chunnel). Not so for Cyprus.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 10:01:23

Not so for Cyprus.

There are ferries all over the Med.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:01:02

With the Euro approaching 1999 dollar exchange rate levels, great deals should lie in store for Americans taking European vacations. Just try to stay clear of rioting Greek citizens.

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-06-06 10:43:41

I’m going Stockholm/Baltic in a few weeks. Wouldn’t you know I didn’t pick the eurozone for this summer’s trip?

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-06-06 04:20:54

Bank of America wants to reduce short sale gambles for itself and borrowers

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 7:00 p.m. Friday, June 4, 2010

AUSTIN, Texas - Short sales come with a big gamble - whether the bank will go after a borrower for the unpaid balance of the home loan.

In Florida, lenders have up to five years to file for a so-called “deficiency judgment” and 20 years to collect, leaving borrowers in limbo as to whether they’ll be pursued to pay back some of what the bank lost.

Bank of America wants to end the suspense.

Jack Schakett, Bank of America senior vice president for credit loss and mitigation strategies, said this week that if a borrower proves he can no longer pay the mortgage and has few or no assets, the bank will waive its right to a deficiency judgment during the closing of the short sale deal.

But if someone can afford to pay or has assets, the bank will try to negotiate a set fee for the borrower to pay at closing. If the borrower refuses to turn over financial information, the bank will retain its right to go after the money.

“We want to help customers who legitimately can’t afford to make payments, but we don’t want the ones who have a bunch of money to just be able to walk away,” Schakett said. “They have to share some of our pain.”

Comment by shelby
2010-06-06 07:49:09

I’ve been waiting for a BOA SS for 4 Months in NoVA now w/ not a word from them!!!

Comment by elvismcduf
2010-06-06 16:49:34

I’ve had dozens of offers totally ignored…cash offers.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:02:22

“Bank of America wants to reduce short sale gambles for itself and borrowers”

Perhaps they could get the Fed to financially engineer a means for U.S. taxpayers to cover any gambling losses?

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 04:33:05

So is everyone boycotting evil BP? Before you do, realize that while it may feel good to send a message to those big bad evil oil profiteers, what you’re really doing is

a) hurting the independent BP gas station owner who is no more at fault than you or me

b) the pension funds heavily invested in BP stock

c) the millions of people with 401k money invested in funds that invest in BP

d) the tens of thousands of US BP workers, of which 99.9% had nothing to do with the spill and may well be on the unemployment line

Comment by arizonadude
2010-06-06 06:54:29

BP dropped the ball here.they should have had a plan to fix a break in a pipline before they sunk a well 5000′ underwater.After 45 days they are still experimenting, screw BP!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 09:44:50

Yeah fine. So you punish the BP gas station owner by putting him out of business? You punish the pension fund that has millions of dollars of BP stock? You punish the secretaries, accountants, IT support staff that works at BP’s corporate office?

If it makes you feel better….

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 13:15:44

Not everybody on the Death Star was a storm trooper, Eddie. But it was still the Death Star.

Just sayin….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2010-06-06 07:12:03

Poor BP. We should take up a collection for them.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-06-06 12:28:05

Or give them a jiffy lube.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 13:30:07

:lol: +1

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:12:45

Life’s tough all over. To quote you, “Get over it”.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-06-06 12:17:35

“Get over it”

We all know that only applies to worker bees who are losing their jobs. Business owners are different and deserve to pitied, if not outroght bailed out.

 
 
Comment by mariner22
2010-06-06 07:40:58

If we boycott BP, we will choke off the funding for the clean up. While, I am in the camp that believes BP will never be able to truely clean up this epic mess and “make all those affected whole,” every cent they contribute will help.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 08:01:00

Seize BP! Free gas for everyone in the Gulf Coast states for the rest of their lives!

 
Comment by Athena
2010-06-06 13:49:43

BS!!! We are SO nut cutting of any $$$ for cleanup!!! That is ridiculous!!!!

BP made $367 BILLION dollars in 2008

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=BP&annual

That is roughly about a BILLION dollars in revenue PER DAY!

For those of you who whine that it is revenue and not profit…

They made $60 MILLION in PROFIT PER DAY in 2008

The government just sent them a preliminary $69 Million dollar bill… so um… about a day’s profit. :-/ Further, less than an hour if we are talking revenue per hour.

Oh, and then there is this… http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14spill.html

GOP Douchebag out of Alaska is key to defeat of the bill that would raise the amount oil companies need to pay in damages when THEY have a disasterous spill.

WTF? If due to your negligence, you hit someone with your car… what is YOUR liability likely to look like? You think YOU will get off with only being liable for about what you make per hour? Or what you net in one day? Seriously? Why does the oil industry need to have such protection? Why do the taxpayers need to step up and pay for ANY of the clean up whatsoever? I’m just asking, cuz it doesn’t sound like anyone else is…

Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 15:24:16

And how much tax did BP pay on all that money?

That’s the side of the ledger you always forget about.

By the way, would you be happier if BP lost $300B a year? Would you be happy if it went bankrupt and laid off all its employees and didn’t pay any of the taxes and most importantly didn’t provide the energy used by tens of millions of people every day?

Maybe I’m old fashioned but I was led to believe being successful was a good thing. Or is that no longer the case in Barrack Obama’s Amerika?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-06-06 15:56:56

Maybe I’m old fashioned but I was led to believe being successful was a good thing. Or is that no longer the case in Barrack Obama’s Amerika?

Who programs u?

 
Comment by measton
2010-06-06 19:09:08

Let’s see Exxon paid zero dollars in tax and made a lot more than BP.
My guess is BP didn’t pay much more than this.

abcnews.go.com/Business/Tax/ge-exxon-paid-us-income-taxes-09/story?id=10300167

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-06-06 07:47:55

Hey Haskell, you need a new girlfriend…here ya go pal:

Cheney’s Former Spokeswoman Tapped for BP Media Relations Post:

“…Dick Cheney’s former campaign spokeswoman reportedly has been hired to run U.S. media relations for BP as the oil giant struggles to plug the massive leak in the Gulf of Mexico while fending off mounting criticism.

Reuters first reported that Anne Womack-Kolton, who served as the former vice president’s press secretary in the 2004 campaign and as public affairs head for the Department of Energy, was joining the BP team.”

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! (fpss™) :-)

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 13:31:46

Even Goebbels could have learned a thing or two from that team!

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-06-06 08:14:24

Whatever. There’s nothing bad enough that can happen to that outlaw corporation and its executives. It needs to go away yesterday and we need to have a corporate death penalty. Seize the company and jail its executives.

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 09:41:42

we need to have a corporate death penalty. Seize the company and jail its executives.

Agreed. one should be able to bring criminal charges against a company. If the board isn’t personally liable, then we should be able to “lock up” the company, forcing it to cease operations for whatever period of time…

Or execute it…

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 08:20:47

BP is no better or worse than most US or multinational corporations.

Comment by scdave
2010-06-06 09:28:09

I agree…For the most part they are all bandits…

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:03:45

What’s the old joke?

“How can you tell if a corporation is lying?

Is that a trick question?”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2010-06-06 08:51:35

“d) the tens of thousands of US BP workers, of which 99.9% had nothing to do with the spill and may well be on the unemployment line”

I’ve yet to hear of BP (and Halliburton and Transocean) canning the .1% of the employees that DID have some responsibility for this. Get that done and then I’ll show some sympathy for the rest of the folks in groups A-D.

Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 09:11:22

So if your employer ever did something that you had no part of, you’d fully support a boycott of your employer?

And never mind the fact that is was an ***ACCIDENT***. The knee-jerk liberal reaction is to boycott, indict, regulate and tax. So I guess next time there is a plane crash we should ban all air travel, and put the CEO of the airline in jail.

Or another option is t o recognize that accidents happen and act like adults, not like 3 year olds throwing a tantrum.

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 09:44:00

So if your employer ever did something that you had no part of, you’d fully support a boycott of your employer?

If you disagree with the action that led to the boycott, I would hope you would quit your job and find a new one…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Kim
2010-06-06 09:44:39

Geeze, don’t have a cow. I am saying that those accountable should be held accountable. That’s all. If you think this whole thing was entirely “an accident” then you haven’t been paying attention.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 09:54:53

Oh gawd. It wasn’t accident now? So BP intentionally did this? Was this before or after they sent in the black helicopters to blow up the WTC?

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-06-06 12:27:34

Right……accident. I’d suggest waiting for the results of the inquiry before making that call.

Did they cut corners, vs. the industry’s standard practices? Did they install all the appropriate safety/blowout prevention gear, and was it maintained and checked?

Blowouts like this are a well known hazard, and procedures and equipment have been developed to prevent/mitigate collateral damage.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:06:28

It wasn’t an accident. Preliminary inquiries have already been conducted (didn’t see that in the news, did you?) and it turns out some BP bigwig contradicted and then overrode the more experienced engineer for capping the new well.

 
Comment by Kim
2010-06-06 14:14:38

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/sex-lies-and-oil-spills_b_564163.html

“First, BP failed to install a deep hole shut off valve — another fail-safe that might have averted the spill. And second, BP’s reported willingness to violate the law by drilling to depths of 22,000-25,000 feet instead of the 18,000 feet maximum depth allowed by its permit may have contributed to this catastrophe.”

“The blow out occurred shortly after Halliburton completed an operation to reinforce drilling hole casing with concrete slurry. This is a sensitive process that, according to government experts, can trigger catastrophic blowouts if not performed attentively. According to the Minerals Management Service, 18 of 39 blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico since 1996 were attributed to poor workmanship injecting cement around the metal pipe.”

Poor Eddy. Sounds like your green shoots BP stock purchase didn’t work out. I wasn’t even intentionally boycotting BP (up to now). Boycotting was a non issue as I’d have to drive pass at least six other gas stations to even get to the nearest BP.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-06-06 20:32:26

EddieTard….. Thank you for posting. You’ve completely established what little you know about nearly everything.

I work for one of the top civil design firms in the country. It’s a PC…. the real McCoy. Now given your proven inability to grasp the most basic understanding of professional services, I don’t expect you to know what a PC is but I’ll explain.

We’re a professional corporation, bonded, insured and registered with each states Department of Law(yeah EddieTard…. there is such a thing….. even in Frogballs, Georgia). We design dams, pipelines big enough to fit a locomotive, and yes…. we co-design structural elements for oil platforms. And when our design FAILS like the mechanical elements of BP’s platform, it’s no accident. It’s called professional misconduct and typically results in jail time for my colleagues in the event deaths occur. Given the magnitude of the damage caused by this misconduct, you should thank your lucky stars you weren’t involved in this design disaster in any way.

So you go on peddling your retail/end user junk and keep telling yourself how much you know. It’s most entertaining.

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-06-06 09:54:20

“And never mind the fact that is was an ***ACCIDENT***.”

Is it really an “accident” if it was caused by gross negligence from the company with by far the worst safety record in the industry?

Jail the execs and let the workers continue working for someone else. The bulk of the employees don’t have to be left unemployed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ProperBostonian
2010-06-06 11:22:58

Of all the blog joints in all the towns, in all the world, he’s gotta post on ours.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-06-06 13:03:15

1. And never mind the fact that is was an ***ACCIDENT***. The knee-jerk liberal reaction is to boycott, indict, regulate and tax. So I guess next time there is a plane crash we should ban all air travel, and put the CEO of the airline in jail.

2. Or another option is t o recognize that accidents happen and act like adults, not like 3 year olds throwing a tantrum.

But isn’t your statement # 1 kind of like a 3 year old writing out a straw man tantrum thing?

Just a little maybe?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 14:05:51

Personally, if my employer had the lack of competence to allow this accident to happen, I would find different employment. But then I have integrity…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SaladSD
2010-06-06 15:38:07

It wasn’t totally an “accident”. Cheney’s secret energy task force, pre 9/11, decided that BP didn’t need to spend 500 million for a remote control valve turn-off switch, so….this accident was actually the proverbial price of doing business. A calculation that they lost, and our economy and environment has to live with.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 09:14:34

I boycott nothing.

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 09:45:04

except voting :)

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 11:54:34

Ow! That hurt! Ok. I boycott voting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SV guy
2010-06-06 11:57:52

Ziiiing!

 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-06-06 12:56:30

d) the tens of thousands of US BP workers, of which 99.9% had nothing to do with the spill and may well be on the unemployment line

Why do you care about these tens of thousands of BP workers when in the past you have not shown much concern for the millions of workers idled by corporate outsourcing, downsizing and layoffs?

Why do you show concern about BP workers becoming unemployed when in the past you have not shown much empathy for the unemployed? After all couldn’t this be a great opportunity for the former BP workers to become self-employed instead of (as you have described employees) just “sitting in their cubes complaining about how unfair life is”?

Couldn’t this be a great opportunity for the former BP workers to become freelancing “producers”? Like you, because it’s easy right?

In “free-markets” is not the consumer voting with his pocketbook a constantly promoted, essential part of the free-market dogma? Or is this case different?

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-06-06 13:02:12

Quit feeding the troll. He does go away.

Comment by Silverback1011
2010-06-06 14:53:06

Why did he come back I wonder ??

Comment by mikey
2010-06-06 15:13:57

“Why did he come back I wonder ??”

Cookies…somebody keeps feeding him cookies !!

“…and watch out, those goddam monkeys bite, I’ll tell ya…”

;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by neuromance
2010-06-06 18:11:54

It’s either support BP (by buying their gas) or boycott them (by not buying their gas).

I choose the latter. If BP goes under, it might remove their decision makers from the ability to make decisions (which seem to have been bad), and serves as an object lesson to other large companies who are insufficiently concerned about externalizing costs.

Of course if the execs just get golden parachutes, then the boycott might be moot.

But… better safe than sorry.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 05:19:37

Liar, liar, pants on fire. May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits and nether regions forever, Tony Hayward.

“We are going to stop the leak. We’re going to clean up the oil, we’re going to remediate any environmental damage and we are going to return the Gulf coast to the position it was in prior to this event,” Hayward said. “That’s an absolute commitment, we will be there long after the media has gone, making good on our promises.”

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 05:29:36

“With no oil response workers on Queen Bess, Plaquemines Parish coastal zone management director P.J. Hahn decided he could wait no longer, pulling an exhausted brown pelican from the oil, slime dripping from its wings.

“We’re in the sixth week, you’d think there would be a flotilla of people out here,” Hahn said. “As you can see, we’re so far behind the curve in this thing.”

Yep. Who ya gonna believe, Tony Hayward or your lyin’ eyes?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 05:47:33

Who is going to clean up all those oily, slime-dripping politicians and lobbyists?

Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 05:53:54

The November voters, maybe?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by wmbz
2010-06-06 06:03:11

One can only hope that one day the population in general will get it, but I have little to no faith in the brain dead voters. Time and time again they fall for the pablum that lying paid off con artist politicians feed them.

 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 06:09:46

I’m not holding my breath. You have to live in the Gulf region to really understand how surreal the whole event is. Florida had plenty of time to mobilize and get out ahead of things a little bit. But no, Good Time Charlie Crist (governor) was too busy shaking down BP for 25 million for a freakin’ ad campaign, instead of getting booms and skimmers and crews in place.

What’s really surreal about the whole situation is the spectator aspect of it, as opposed to the response aspect. Everyone wants to get out in boats or up in planes and LOOK at it and TALK about it, and show close-ups of sticks poking turds of oil on the beach. You’ve got the scientific boats out there taking their measurements and the news crews floating around and the tankers and what have you, it really is mass confusion. Then you’ve got the politicians conducting “therapy sessions” for concerned citizens who want to vent. Meanwhile the crap just washes up on the shore.

Contrast this with Philippe Cousteau, grandson of Jacques, who is in St. Petersburg. At least he did something, got a bunch of folks organized to start picking up trash along the beaches and waterways, because that stuff would have made the whole thing worse had the oil hit it. Maybe it looks feeble, but at least it is a response.

 
Comment by Rancher
2010-06-06 06:14:11

Until the food runs out. Then all rules are out.

 
Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 06:15:30

When times are easy voters become distracted by issues that don’t matter a whit, but their focus changes when times get tough.

Patience, our nation is undergoing a generational sea-change in values.

 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 08:15:30

“It’s brutally unfair. It’s wrong,” Obama said in the address, recorded a day earlier in Grand Isle, Louisiana. “And what I told these men and women — and what I have said since the beginning of this disaster — is that I’m going to stand with the people of the Gulf Coast until they are made whole.”

It appeared that BP was making progress after capping the breached wellhead, Obama said, but he said that the federal government was “prepared for the worst.” He cited a series of statistics that illustrated the “largest response to an environmental disaster of this kind in the history of our country.”

• 17,500 National Guard troops authorized for deployment;

• 20,000 people currently working to protect waters and coastlines;

• 1,900 vessels in the Gulf assisting in the cleanup;

• 4.3 million feet of boom deployed with another 2.9 million feet of boom available, enough to stretch over 1,300 miles;

• 17 staging areas across Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida to rapidly defend sensitive shorelines.”

Who ya gonna believe? Bammy, or yer lyin’ eyes? Oh, and those National Guard troops? Phantom inventory.

Jeepers, it hits you like a lead sock when you realize this administration is even LESS capable than the prior one. Completely and utterly incapable. Wow. Just. Wow.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 09:18:02

“Patience, our nation is undergoing a generational sea-change in values.”

Didn’t we just do that by electing the Big O? What’s to say the next elected official hasn’t already made a Faustian bargain in some smoked filled room for the privilege to serve or not serve the people under a Democrat, Republican, fill-in-the-blank flag?

Who in this room doesn’t believe Dodd is actually a lobbyist for the financial industry posing as a Senator of and for the people? His best friend is Tangello for cripesake!

Don’t be sheep, man. It’s blah, blah, blasphemy to my ear.

 
Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 09:30:53

Dodd will soon be gone. So will a lot of others who are entrenched. Voters are pissed.

Give it a few months, until November.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 12:25:03

I really want to believe what you say, but I’ve learned never to argue with the market, with properly collected data, and facts.

Dodd will be gone after he writes, and lobbies from the inside, the financial industry’s bill to its liking but before the FCIC report is written.

 
Comment by neuromance
2010-06-06 18:14:29

The politicians are doing the only thing they’re good at - jerking off the public.

 
 
 
Comment by nycityboy
2010-06-06 05:50:43

Just a couple weeks ago I stated on the HBB that this could become Obama’s Katrina. That met with much resistance here.

I don’t understand how every resource imaginable hasn’t been mobilized. I guess he is too busy having Summers dream up bailout schemes and talking about foreclosure relief to protect the “values of people’s homes” to concentrate on this debacle. The entire mission of this government is now to protect home values and to make as many people dependent on government aid as possible. No pelican is going to stand in the way of that noble cause.

Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 07:02:15

No time to co-ordinate the efforts for the spill.

Plenty of time to have Paul McCartney over to the WH for a private show. Good to know the prez has his priorities straight.

Now if there were a golf course in Louisiana that he wanted to play, maybe then something would get done.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2010-06-06 09:45:57

Plenty of time to have Paul McCartney over to the WH for a private show ??

But it was cautious optimism, optimism that would ultimately fade as we got news, not just from New Orleans, but from Gulfport and points east as well.

George W. Bush chose to deal with this serious situation by goofing around, getting a free guitar, and giving John McCain a birthday cake — actions no man who actually cared about the people he led could have taken.Of course, Bush never really gave a damn about the people he led. And no day more perfectly illustrated the contempt in which he holds you, me, and 1800 dead Louisianans than August 29, 2005

 
Comment by SV guy
2010-06-06 12:03:56

“W” was a friggin’ idiot. He seemed so far detached from reality it was frightening. The worst president, imo, of my lifetime.

Bammy is making him look better with each passing day.

Time for a hard-reboot for this country.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 13:11:14

Sounds like youve lost that hope n change lovin’ feeling. So hard to go on when you learn your hero is a fraud eh? Well tough. You roke it you own it. Enjoy the next 3 years. This clown is only getting warmed up. If you think this is a cluster wait until a 9/11 type of event happens. God help us all

 
Comment by scdave
2010-06-06 20:39:40

God help us all ??

God did help us all E-Dee….Mac & Palin lost..

 
 
Comment by rms
2010-06-06 07:14:10

“The entire mission of this government is now to protect home values and to make as many people dependent on government aid as possible. No pelican is going to stand in the way of that noble cause.”

+1

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rancher
2010-06-06 07:24:54

Democrats Vote Down 5 Percent Rule

In a bid to stem taxpayer losses for bad loans guaranteed by federal housing agencies Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn) proposed that borrowers be required to make a 5% down payment in order to qualify.

His proposal was rejected 57-42 on a party-line vote because, as Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn) explained:

“…passage of such a requirement would restrict home ownership to only those who can afford it.”

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 09:13:21

“His proposal was rejected 57-42 on a party-line vote because, as Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn) explained: ”

Since when are there 42 Republicans in the Senate?

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-06-06 11:42:21

Don’t split hairs, Eddie. Kit Bond and Charles Grassley were the only Republicans who voted no. Democrats Conrad, Bayh and Warner voted yes on Corker’s 5% downpayment amendment.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 13:20:57

Chris “Countrywide” Dodd standing in the way of fiscal responsibility? Inconceivable!

That 5% requirement is going to take care of itself once the banks get burned bad enough. I’ll be surprised if 20% becomes standard again.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:23:39

“Just a couple weeks ago I stated on the HBB that this could become Obama’s Katrina. That met with much resistance here.”

Not from me. The Emperor has no clothes. I am no fan of Bush, but the response time to Katrina was 5 days as opposed to 45 and countring for the BP spill.

“I don’t understand how every resource imaginable hasn’t been mobilized.”

It is hard to fathom insanity, but that’s what it is. You’re looking for a logical “reason why”, but there’s no such thing when you’re dealing with the insane. The highest skill that Bammy has is oratory, and that’s about all he has. So his help consists of coming down to the Gulf and delivering an oration. Now, of course, he reasonably expects that Salazar or Napolitano or Holder or one of his capos might spring into action, but they only know how to gather around a podium like he does. And who can blame them? He’s setting the example. Hapless president, hapless staff. Nobody has the concept that they’re supposed to actually do anything, other than appear for photo ops.

This is worse, far worse than the response to Katrina. Not even close.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SUGuy
2010-06-06 08:55:15

A spill of this magnitude and the chemical damage it causes is an irreversible process. The sea floor will be a graveyard for a few generations. I suggest getting to the 5th stage of The Kübler-Ross model.

Sorry

 
Comment by measton
2010-06-06 19:14:39

Tell us again what resources the US gov has to contain an oil spill.

Tell us what resources are sitting idle????

The failure was in not regulaiting the oil industry.
In not mandatitg that if they are going to drill that they have a contingency plan to control an event like this.

The current system seems to be working. It seem sto me that they should have been required to have a proven system reeady before they atarted to drill.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-06-06 07:36:36

(Odd how this Sh@sta never enters my mind when I’m sailing…)

Filed under: “Now… they’re full of “TrueAnger™”” …or… “I’m from the GOP, and I’m a “fiscal conservative”, really I am…” :-)

“Now a free lunch is a free lunch regardless of whether or not it’s the kind you like or the kind you despite and for far too long American’s of all political persuasions have been convinced that they could have a free lunch. The TEA Party can blame Obama all they want for the current financial problems but he’s only doing what the last three Republican President’s did before him, AND NOBODY SEEMED TO CARE!

Going forward, any GOP candidate for president or congress needs to address these points in total in order for me to take them seriously. They must be brave enough to say out loud that there needs to be cuts in defense, Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security. There must be tax increases (specifically doing away with the Bush tax cuts). Anything less than a guarantee on all of the above and we might as well throw Obama another four years; at least he’s being true to his party’s platform.”

The chart above is the 2009 federal budget. Here’s the breakdown:

Mandatory spending: $1.89 trillion (+6.2%)

$944 billion - Social Security
$408 billion - Medicare
$224 billion - Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
$360 billion - Unemployment/Welfare/Other mandatory spending
$260 billion - Interest on National Debt

Discretionary spending: $1.21 trillion (+4.9%)

$515.4 billion - United States Department of Defense
* $145.2 billion(2008*) - Global War on Terror
* $70.4 billion - United States Department of Health and Human Services
$68.2 billion - United States Department of Transportation
$45.4 billion - United States Department of Education
$44.8 billion - United States Department of Veterans Affairs
$38.5 billion - United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
$38.3 billion - State and Other International Programs
$37.6 billion - United States Department of Homeland Security
$25.0 billion - United States Department of Energy
$20.8 billion - United States Department of Agriculture
$20.3 billion - United States Department of Justice
$17.6 billion - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$12.5 billion - United States Department of the Treasury
$10.6 billion - United States Department of the Interior
$10.5 billion - United States Department of Labor
$8.4 billion - Social Security Administration
$7.1 billion - United States Environmental Protection Agency
$6.9 billion - National Science Foundation
$6.3 billion - Judicial branch (United States federal courts)
$4.7 billion - Legislative branch (United States Congress)
$4.7 billion - United States Army Corps of Engineers
$0.4 billion - Executive Office of the President
$0.7 billion - Small Business Administration
$7.2 billion - Other agencies
$39.0 billion(2008*) - Other Off-budget Discretionary Spending

The Tea Party: Too Little Too Late, An Honest Look at 20+ Years of Deficit Spending and Increased Federal Debt
Posted on June 5th, 2010
by Mark Radulich in All News

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 09:53:22

Dodge,

I guess your mother never taught you the “two wrongs don’t make a right” argument huh?

And besides you, as always, are telling only 1/2 the story.

Oblablah’s deficit for last year and this year is in the trillions. That’s a deficit, not debt. He is the first president to have that dishonor. The same hysterical liberals who were crying about BOOOOSH’s deficits, now cheer when Oblablah’s deficit are 3 or 4 times the size.

You are a hypocrite among hypocrites.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-06-06 13:08:00

Wow Eddie,

You really need to take a good look in the mirror yourself. From my vantage point you seem to be a big hypocrite yourself.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:12:46

So the the guy who the mess for the next guy isn’t to blame huh?

How long have you and kettle been good friends?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:13:46

Dammit we need an edit function

“So the the guy who MADE the mess”

 
Comment by mikey
2010-06-06 16:22:51

In 1962, Rachael Carson wrote “Silent Spring” expressing concerns with pesticides and pollution of the environment.

Regardless what you think or where you stand on business, environmental and ecological issues, this nightmare is gonna be the Mother of All Messes and will haunt and poison us for decades to come.

God help the innocents, the poor critters, the gulf and the people down there because, we as a nation, were surely warned many times before this incident.

It’s all very sad and sickening and like everyone else, I’m praying that the men that caused it, will someway find a way to solve it and fast

…just sayin’

:(

 
 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 14:15:31

You are making the assumption that the federal government, or anyone, could do something about this. You’re wrong. I did not vote for Obama, but I am not going to trash somebody for something they have no control over.

BP is trying to learn how to fix this kind of problem in real time now. The question is who were the idiots who thought it was okay to drill in deep water in the first place? Were you one of them?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Kim
2010-06-06 15:15:44

Brazil and Norway both require the use of an acoustical regulator - an extra valve that can be operated remotely in an event such as what happened to BP. This adds an additional cost of $500,000 to the well. The oil industry successfully lobbied Bush and Cheney to eliminate the requirement of this regulator, which might have prevented this catastrophe. So you’re right, Jon, you can’t blame Obama, except to the extent that BO has had over a year in office and control of congress needed to reinstate this safety measure (and others), but did not. This kind of accident has happened many times before, so the situation cannot be labeled “unexpected”. Clearly neither party has been looking out for the best interests of the American people and the environment in which they live.

I’m actually of the mind that unless and until we can get alternative energy viable on a mass scale, this country is (unfortunately) going to need to do deepwater drilling. It should be done in the most careful, responsible, and conservative manner possible: no cutting corners - ever, and no overriding the experienced engineers. If existing oil companies won’t agree to those terms, I am sure the market will create or find one that will.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 15:19:44

“I am not going to trash somebody for something they have no control over. ”

Bush was 100% to blame for Katrina.
Obama is an innocent bystander with the oil spill.

The liberal mind is a fascinating one.

 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 15:28:41

“If existing oil companies won’t agree to those terms, I am sure the market will create or find one that will.”

I think you have far too much confidence in the market. I’m sure an American car company will step up and produce cars that are of high quality and get good mileage too… Any minute now.

 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 15:55:07

Eddie:

““I am not going to trash somebody for something they have no control over. ”

Bush was 100% to blame for Katrina.
Obama is an innocent bystander with the oil spill.

The liberal mind is a fascinating one.”

I don’t blame Bush for Katrina. Nor do I blame Obama for the Gulf oil disaster. I understand that one of our political parties (the Republicans) has you bent over their pillow, administering some hard love and you like it. Squeal baby squeal! Real America will fight you trolls, on both the left & right and we will win.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 17:03:27

“Real America” is fat, stupid, complacent, and can’t be bothered to get up from their TV.

As far as our political duopoly, both parties have but one purpose: to provide top cover for TBTF banks and facilitate the continued looting of the real, physical economy by their Wall Street puppet-masters.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 18:39:58

Hey, Sammy- Tell us how St. Ron Paul would have plugged the spill by now. It’s getting late, and I need a bed-time story. With a happy ending.

(”And the complete lack of regulations on all corporations, made everything work out fine. Just like it never has before. The End.”)

 
Comment by measton
2010-06-06 19:20:31

Again the difference between Katrina and this.

1. FEMA is perfectly designed to deal with a Katrina.
2. There is no entity in gov to deal with an oil spill.

If we are going to blame soimeone in gov blame the people who rolled back regulations and didn’t enforce the ones that were left in place.

Someone noted that BP was learning how to deal with this spill. WTF, they should have been required to test these systems after the very first deep water well.

 
Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 22:03:19

Hey, Sammy- Tell us how St. Ron Paul would have plugged the spill by now. It’s getting late, and I need a bed-time story. With a happy ending.

In a more libertarian/smaller federal government situation, it isn’t that the spill necessarily would have been plugged by now….assuming this was the first disaster of this size..

However, the entities involved would be subject to all kinds of civil suits. There wouldn’t be a limit on the liability of the company. With some luck, the idea of corporate personhood wouldn’t exist at all, and the execs/employees might even be personally liable.

As a result, other execs, corporations, and employees would realize there are consequences to careless actions - the execs would be bankrupted, as would the company, and perhaps the employees involved, and such a disaster would be far less likely. The execs wouldn’t be so cavalier in trading safety for profit. The employees involved likely would speak up if they thought things were unsafe, and be more personally invested in the safety of the rig…

It’s about making people personally responsible for their actions, rather than having gov’t guarantees, or limits on liability.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ProperBostonian
2010-06-06 11:21:13

“Liar, liar, pants on fire. May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits and nether regions forever, Tony Hayward.”

Fleas–when you finish with Tony’s armpits, hop on over to Eddie’s. He wants to share BP’s pain.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-06-06 06:08:22

Attorney: Chinese drywall ruined Banner Supply
South Florida Business Journal

Banner Supply Co. has been a fixture in the Miami building industry for 40 years.

Now, after a construction recession and the Chinese drywall fiasco, the company is “just trying to survive,” said its attorney, Michael Peterson.

The company bought defective Chinese drywall from importers in 2006, as domestic supplies dwindled. Now, Banner is caught in a firestorm of lawsuits and allegations that it mishandled the crisis.

Its statewide network of warehouses has been decimated. In the last two years, the company closed locations in Port St. Lucie and Fort Myers, while downsizing operations in Tampa, West Palm Beach, Pompano Beach and Miami.

As a result, the company has slashed its workforce to 65 from 222.

The big question is whether Banner knew that Chinese drywall was dangerous and corrosive, not just smelly, and when the company knew it.

The company has long maintained that it stopped using Chinese imported drywall in early 2007 because a few complaints about a smell of rotten eggs came from homeowners who bought WCI Communities homes in South Florida, and because domestic wallboard became available.

Comment by Lip
2010-06-06 07:01:26

I suspect they didn’t really think about it too much as they saw an opportunity to sell cheaper drywall.

By purchasing this drywall from the Chinese (if they did), they become the only company that the lawyers can sue “unless” they got a domestic certificate of insurance from their Chinese friends. A COI will protect them somewhat up to the limits of the policy, but I suspect even that wouldn’t do much with this fiasco.

I see this all the time in my job. People import all kinds of things without any kind of legal protection from the product liability exposure they’re assuming.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:15:50

Maybe if they, I dunno, had made some periodic INSPECTIONS (you know, a little QC)? of the the product they were buying, they might not be in this mess.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-06-06 06:09:49

Boone Pickens: Get Ready for $400 Oil?
Mad Money

If US energy policy continues on its present path, legendary oilman T. Boone Pickens told Cramer on Friday, the price for a barrel of crude could jump more than five times its present level in a decade.

Pickens was using OPEC revenues between 2003 and 2008 as a model, he said. Those revenues clocked in at $250 billion in 2003, but just five years later they had skyrocketed to $1.250 trillion, five times that of ’03.

“If we don’t do anything,” Pickens said, “in 10 years we will be paying $300 or $400 a barrel for the oil.”

The US is already paying $1 billion a day for crude, he said, and it accounts for two-thirds of the country’s trade deficit. That doesn’t need to happen, though. If the US used its own resources, Pickens thinks the move would lead to job creation, and those dollars would stay at home.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-06-06 06:58:13

All thse big oil guys are trying to make money in alternative energy now.they placed their bets and trying to get the sheeple on board so they can get richer.

 
Comment by Lip
2010-06-06 07:10:05

Yes, T Bone can see the future of $10 a gallon gasoline. Obama can see it too, but he doesnt’ care because he thinks that that will make us go “green”.

Too bad for all the poor folks that have to drive to work and are stuck in a gas guzzling vehicle. As for the Lip family, we’re moving closer to whatever we’re doing

Comment by measton
2010-06-06 08:21:52

Too bad for all the poor folks that have to drive to work and are stuck in a gas guzzling vehicle.

I guess they can’t afford a small car???

Comment by In Colorado
2010-06-06 12:24:59

I guess they can’t afford a small car???

And give up the F-350? That would be UnAmerican!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:19:12

You’re right. Poor people can’t afford $17,000 basic cars. They can’t even afford sub 10k used cars.

Uh, they’re “poor.” Get it?

And for those of you who don’t get out very often, the days of a running car that costs less than 3K and will pass inspection are gone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 14:34:14

and will pass inspection

Hrm..could that be due to……REGULATION?!?!?!

</Church Lady> :)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 15:27:06

No, it was due to people (and used car dealers) who were too stupid to keep their cars repaired and therefore safe that they to had make basic inspections mandatory.

(BTW, I remember the church lady. That was some funny stuff!)

 
Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 16:04:17

No, it was due to people (and used car dealers) who were too stupid to keep their cars repaired and therefore safe that they to had make basic inspections mandatory.

mandatory inspections = regulation = raise the cost of owning a car…

 
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-06-06 10:00:39

“Too bad for all the poor folks that have to drive to work and are stuck in a gas guzzling vehicle.”

Somehow, lots of people managed to find fuel efficient vehicles. The truly poor don’t even have vehicles.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 12:54:36

I read somewhere that it costs more money to heat a home in the midwest and northeast than it does to cool a home in Phoenix. And if you live along the light rail route and work along that route, you won’t really need a car that much!

In LA the closest light rail station is in Redondo Beach, about 4 and a half miles north of me.

Cities are starting to gear up for the oil price hikes. Coming soon, to a block near you!

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 13:24:54

Bill,

Rent “The Death of Suburbia.” They should start calling it “Disturbia.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 15:12:53

Rihanna has a song called “Disturbia!”

James Howard Kunstler. Interesting fellow. I think some of what he says is going to happen. Then in a couple of generations the nuclear fusion cells will power cars and once again will be middle class and upper class people fleeing to the suburbs. But looks as though in the short run, the inner city is the place to be. The rural areas will be for farmers. That’s about the only good paying option for rural types.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-06-06 17:25:48

For an old geezer its cool you know about Rhianna…LOL

 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 13:23:12

T. Boone Pickens is a snake oil salesman right up there with Al Gore.

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 06:12:08

Uh-oh. Looks like we have a horsing bubble, too.

Lawsuits are only tip of problems in equine lending market
By Janet Patton - jpatton1@herald-leader.com

http://www.kentucky.com/2010/06/06/1294660/lawsuits-are-only-tip-of-problems.html#ixzz0q4tDzF00

In the past six months, the Thoroughbred industry has been rocked by one multimillion lawsuit after another. Altogether, Central Kentucky banks are suing horsemen for at least $54.4 million.

By some estimates, that would be equivalent to 5 percent to 10 percent of the equine lending market tied up in troubled debts, a potentially significant stone around the neck of an already struggling horse industry.

Each lawsuit is unique, but one thread runs through them all: The loans were collateralized with horses.

Farms that relied on lines of credit for operating capital have had those lines cut in half because the value of the collateral — the horses — has fallen.

“The primary event that needs to occur (to right the industry) is for the prices in the market to return to some sense of normalcy,” Beck said. “If the market turns back up, the lending relationships will get a little softer.”

Yearlings for sale this year were bred in the spring of 2008, when stud fees were at all-time highs. In many cases, those high stud fees have yet to be paid off.

“The banks are upside down, the stud farms are upside down, there’s no way to get everybody paid,” Meuser said.

He said that based on his observation, the actual number of problem loans is much greater than the few high-profile cases so far.

Many people are in a holding pattern right now, said… attorney Andre Regard.

They can’t repay the loans they have until they sell some horses; they don’t want to sell in a down market and few people can get new loans to buy horses.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-06-06 12:54:56

LMAO…….horse people are even more fooked in the head than house people.

If you know “dog-show” people (see “Best in Show”…..which was a comedy, but solidly based in reality), multiply it by about 20, and you have a “horse show” person. An acquaintance has quarter horses, and cutting horses. Swears that she has a stable full of horses that are “worth” $20-100K each.

Sorta like owning “investment properties”……except these “houses” eat and crap every day.

In my (albeit biased, non-romantic about horses opinion), show horses are a scheme to separate rich/not so rich horse lovers from their money. High dollar “sales” (comps) are set by these people selling each other horses for outrageous money, then they tell the rubes that their artificially inflated sale prices are actually market prices. And of course, they are handy to provide board, services, etc. after the horse owns the rube.

And all the crap you need to go to shows…….saddles, tack, a fifth wheel trailer, the Dodge/Ford diesel dually to pull it, etc.

This sorta works when all kind of free money is floating around, and you can’t add. It’s when money gets tight when the problems start. Buyers disappear, income disappears, but the horses still gotta eat…….

As many are finding out locally, you cannot GIVE a horse away, when all the buyers/suckers go away.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:23:45

I love horses, but horse are like boats… it’s a place to throw your money away.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 18:51:39

I agree with your description of horse-show people, who are very similar to dog-show people. But the people discussed in the article are (supposedly) very wealthy thoroughbred (racehorse) owners. Apparently even the uber-rich are having troubles when credit is tight.

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-06-06 06:12:14

Don’t know if Ben’s filters will allow this but you can search unemployment rates by counties

Plaquemines Parish is 5.5%

————————————-
http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=usunemployment&met=unemployment_rate&idim=county:CN220750&dl=en&hl=en&q=Plaquemines+Parish+unemployment#met=unemployment_rate

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 10:06:05

if the filters don’t like something like that, you can always use tinyurl dot com

 
 
Comment by nycityboy
2010-06-06 06:17:06

I took a walk along 8th Street yesterday. That cuts through the Village and NYU. All I can say is, “dude, where’s my recovery?” More and more businesses have closed down. One store had a sign thanking customers for 9 years but will be going out of business on June 15th. Empty storefronts are everywhere.

The statement du jour continues to be, “you just can’t run a small business in this economy”. I believe that should be amended to, “you just can’t run a small business in this economy at these ridiculously high rent prices”. Plus government continues to pick the flesh off of small business. I can’t figure out what these landlords are thinking. I would never want to try to think like a landlord. It would be like trying to think like an FB and I just don’t want to undertake such a trial. Allowing them to extend and pretend has allowed them to hold out for their asking price. The sitzkrieg continues.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-06-06 06:24:41

Dude I used to live at 11w 8th across from McDougal…in a cheap Rent stabilized share before it got yuppified. Its was cool the mass people out late at night live bands all over, and heck you could buy records at 3 in the morning …

 
Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 06:25:14

I can’t figure out what a lot of people are thinking. I go to garage and estate sales and thrift stores, and stuff that people used to think of as junk just a few years ago is all of a sudden “really valuable” and prices have been hiked to the sky. So I don’t do as much buying as I used to. I went to one garage sale where they had this old scale that I was interested in, simply because it functions better than the more recently produced stuff, and I needed it to replace a similar one that got lost when I moved. No price on it, so I asked the lady what she wanted and she promptly went into hysterics “That’s an anteeeeeeeek!” Any time I hear that, I know what’s coming, so I told her that I’d let her keep it.

Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 06:47:22

“I go to garage and estate sales and thrift stores, and stuff that people used to think of as junk just a few years ago is all of a sudden “really valuable” and prices have been hiked to the sky.”

It actually makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

There is more demand for low end “stuff” so the “stuff” is more expensive.

A used Honda Civic today is more expensive relatively speaking to a used Honda Civic 2 or 3 years ago. What I mean is a 2005 model with X miles in 2007 was cheaper than a 2008 model with X miles today. Why? Because in 2007 fewer people wanted a used Civic since they could afford (or thought they could) something better. Today the opposite is true and so as demand for a Civic goes up, so does the price even though the inherent value of a used Civic hasn’t changed.

As a consumer in the market for a Civic you think to yourself, what is happening here? It’s a recession and car prices are going up? This makes no sense. But it makes perfect sense.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:26:32

I can understand a Civic, but not an Italian decorative arts wall hanging from the 1960s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Montana
2010-06-06 18:43:37

I’ve been looking around for a cheap used minivan and those seem to be scarce now. I think people are living in them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-06-06 07:57:29

NYC has a special problem in that the urban area spreads out forever. You really can’t just change locations and expect to retain a customer base. Landlords come a cropper in other places when they try that stuff. Around Boise, many restaurants have closed downtown locations and reopened in lower-rent Meridian: Louie’s and Gino’s Italian restaurants come to mind. Their suburban customer base had no problem with such relocations.

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-06-06 11:41:30

A recovery that requires lowered expectations shouldn’t be called a recovery.

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-06-06 11:52:52

Also, prosperity is the product of capitalism. Lowered expectations is the product of socialism.

Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-06-06 13:07:01

“Prosperity is the product of capitalism”

Not in my neck of the woods. I’ve been trying to do more, with less and less for the past 20-25 years.

I’ve got income tax returns all the way back to 1978. I was a newbie mechanic in 1980, but made more (inflation-corrected) than I did in 2008 (the last year I was employed full time) as a supervisor.

Not to mention all the cost shifting that has been going (tax deductions cut, health care copays and “procedures not covered by plan”. local sales and property taxes, user fees, more added taxes, etc)

As the saying goes, we’ve been doing more and more, with less and less, until soon we will be able to do the impossible, with nothing…..

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:27:05

…for those who don’t appreciate it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 14:29:44

“Prosperity is the product of capitalism”

He doesn’t mean prosperity for most Americans. You don’t count. I know that sucks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:29:10

I’ve seen more small businesses killed by LLs raising their rent every year than by government regulations, which runs a close second.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-06-06 06:30:09

Harry “POS” Reid and his a-hole buddies are just looking out for you…

Senate Democrats Pass Bill Allowing Govt to Collect Addresses, ATM Records of Bank Customers.

(CNSNews.com) – Senate Democrats united to pass a financial regulatory bill that allows the government to collect data on any person operating in financial markets at any level, including the collection of personal transaction records from local banks that list customers’ addresses and ATM receipts.

The bill, if it becomes law, would create the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and empower it to “gather information and activities of persons operating in consumer financial markets,” including the names and addresses of account holders, ATM and other transaction records, and the amount of money kept in each customer’s account.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 06:31:51

Never let a crisis go to waste.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 06:35:23

Bbbbbut, bbbbbbbut, bbbbbbbut Bush did ___________ so this is OK.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:38:42

Yeah, I hate that “Well, Bush________ business”. I used to hear that from my Dem senator’s office, all the squealing and whining about how they can’t do anything because of Bush and repubs.

I hear it even on this blog “Well, Bush______”. If you criticize the Dems or Bammy, you must be a Bushie. Height of stupidity.

 
 
Comment by rms
2010-06-06 07:23:58

“The bill, if it becomes law, would create the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and empower it to “gather information and activities of persons operating in consumer financial markets,” including the names and addresses of account holders, ATM and other transaction records, and the amount of money kept in each customer’s account.”

Gretchen Morgenson briefly hits on the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection with Bill Moyers in this video clip:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03262010/profile.html

 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:04:39

“Senate Democrats united to pass a financial regulatory bill that allows the government to collect data on any person operating in financial markets at any level, including the collection of personal transaction records from local banks that list customers’ addresses and ATM receipts.”

Sounds like George Orwell’s Big Brother took over the Democratic party.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 09:29:31

What can Winston do with all that data?

Hmmmm…..

Just one more reason to save in an alternative currency.

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 10:08:51

Just one more reason to save in an alternative currency.

copper-plated lead?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 13:01:36

Somehow I think my BBEP stock, which yields 10%, is a good currency! Priced way below book value per share.

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-06-06 06:34:25
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:36:14

“Who Killed the Electric Car”

Electric cars have been feasible for 2 decades now. But it’s hard to make money on a vehicle that doesn’t need:
Oil changes
Transmission repairs
Muffler replacements
Cooling system repairs
Sensors, sensors, sensors
GASOLINE
Tune ups
Spark plugs
Injector cleaning
GAS STATIONS

The Japanese have already won this one. Just like they did the high mileage compact car market. Only the Big 3 and Euro car makers don’t know it yet.

Comment by pmseatac
2010-06-06 17:39:31

They are still not practical due to the lack of a reliable, cost effective means of storing electrical energy. The 3-phase motors are excellent - lightweight and powerful, and the control technology is now very good and getting better. But the battery problem has proven to be a difficult one. If that ever gets solved, IC engines in automobiles will be instantly obsolete. Electric cars still need some form of transmission due to the power band of an electric motor, but are simpler and more reliable.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 19:01:31

Didn’t the guy in the article point out that unless you travel more than around 40 miles a day, an electric engine was fine?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-06-06 06:40:46

Good old uncle sugar…

Uncle Sam sole lender for federal student loans
The Baltimore Sun ~ June 6, 2010

After high school seniors graduate this season, they and their parents soon will face another time-honored tradition: paying college tuition.

But the new crop of college-bound freshmen this summer will experience a much different federal student loan program than in years past.

The loan process will be streamlined. Students will have one choice of lender instead of dozens. More money will be available for grants for needy students, and more of them will be eligible for the free money. Even some parents may stand a better chance of qualifying for a federal loan to make up any tuition shortage.

And families likely will hear more pitches from banks and credit unions lenders offering alternatives to a federal loan as they look for other ways to stay in the game, aid experts predict.

This is all happening because of a law passed earlier in the year that requires federal student and parent loans to come directly from Uncle Sam starting in July, instead of through private lenders.

Comment by nycityboy
2010-06-06 07:05:56

The student loan industry was an industry where private companies acted as middle-men for government loans. A simple look at that picture and anybody could have seen it was wrong. Of course I would probably say the party that should have been taken out of the equation is the government. But I don’t think like O. He thought private industry should be removed from the equation.

The goal is to get as many people dependent on government as possible. Welcome to America.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:39:49

“The student loan industry was an industry where private companies acted as middle-men for government loans.”
And added NOTHING of value.

NOTHING except to makes the rates higher.

If you want people to NOT relay on government, then maybe the corporations should stop screwing people over. I know, I know, that’s just damn socialeest/commie talk. A corporation should have the right to screw people over all it wants to right?

Morons.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-06-06 15:55:14

Try again, eco. Who charters corporations?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by mugsy
2010-06-06 07:31:30

Ahhhh! 4 years of college and then 20 years of debt slavery! Or how would you like to be an MD with $200K in non-dischargeable loans?

Medicine may pay well but with that kind of debt from day one you’d be hard pressed to get out of the hole very quickly.

Comment by DennisN
2010-06-06 08:11:35

The NY Times had a story this past week about some woman who graduated from NYU with $97K in debt and no job prospects. Funny how the article completely avoided the most important question: what did she major in? I’ll bet she didn’t major in engineering or some other “useful art”.

I never had any student loans. My dad paid the annual $688 “tuition” at UCSC for my undergrad (and he was making close to $40K in the early 70’s) and I had a TA position when I got my masters at UCSD. When I went to law school in the 1990’s I raided my 401(k) funds.

Which leads me to ask: do student loan applications demand to know the student’s declared major? I would consider a student’s major important information in determining the ability of the student to pay back the loan: the major as collateral as it were.

If so, do loan originators demand annual transcripts from students, and do they make decisions based upon such information? E.g. the loan guy finds the student claiming a chemistry major hasn’t taken any chemistry classes this past year, only sociology classes, so he refuses to fund the loan going forward.

Comment by Groundhogday
2010-06-06 09:04:08

Overall, engineering and science major enrollments have been declining nationwide for 20 years, in favor of the social sciences and business. We depend increasingly upon international students and immigrants for technical expertise.

http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c2/c2s2.htm

Why? Science and engineering are difficult, demanding subjects.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 09:46:13

Students enrolled in science and engineering classes have to have the correct answers to pass the course. That’s not necessairly so with the liberal arts majors.

A student in a liberal arts class merely needs to listen to the instructor and then feed back what he/she heard. The instructor then thinks the student is a wiz because he/she agrees with whatever position the instructor holds on a particular subject.

A science major needs to learn the science. A liberal arts major needs to learn the art of the smooze.

(Okay, bring on the flames.)

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 10:01:41

The reason for the lack of eng degrees is the public school system.

Kids are not taught the basics. Instead the spent countless days/weeks learning about gay studies, the environment, sex ed and hundreds of other social engineering pet projects thought up by the NEA.

And if at the end of the school year there’s some time left, they may learn how to add fractions.

After 12 years of social engineering indoctrination without learning the 3 Rs, it’s no wonder everyone majors in psychology or women’s studies or other such nonsensical majors and eschews anything scientific.

Besides, what’s the point of getting a grueling degree, getting a good job and making a lot of money, when Obama and Co. will penalize you for daring to make money? Much easier to get a $20K a year job and get “free” health care, “free” mortgage assistance and free everything else, all paid for by the saps who dare to make $100K+.

Kids aren’t as dumb as you think they are these days.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 12:05:44

Back in the early 80s, my generation of college students/graduates had dollar signs in their brains. In fact, I taped a dollar sign on my mortar board and sat in the hot sun with the other Math and Computer Science majors. I’ve been working in Computer Science for twenty five years and am still going strong. The pay for me is very good.

It’s nice to get well-rounded with liberal arts and I think humanities courses can sharpen your critical thinking skills. You can get enough humanities and social sciences in general education for your technical degree. But a twenty-something year old should hit the ground running in engineering and sciences, be very enthusiastic and energetic in the work place and be a genuine “do-er” at the same time, and keep that pace for at least ten years. Throw a lot of money into Roth 401ks and Roth IRAs.

Then by age 40 one should reassess the situation and see if he can take his career to a higher level.

I’m amazed that many American students are turned off from the very subjects that could give them solid stable work for a lifetime! One guy on the project I’m working on must be about 80 years old. He’s an example of filling in the slack when young people don’t seem to want to take his place. A lot of people are voluntarily not going for the big income and I guess I don’t understand why they are that way.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-06-06 12:32:41

Not everyone has an aptitude for the sciences, just like not everyone has an aptitude for the arts or language. Engineers are notorious for having poor writing skills. In the past we often could rely on someone else to write the users manuals, but the latest trend is that we have to write them now. I see a lot of guys sweating bullets over this.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 13:06:42

I was one of the two fat boys in elementary school who would always be in the spelling bee with the girls. I was on the high school newspaper. Later I took extra literature and writing classes in college. I loved to read and even tried writing at one point. So as an “engineer” - just a label, when I encounter those engineers who cannot write, I keep wondering how they got through college at all. The old time engineers who are now retired, wrote much better. The state of the public schools is miserable these days.

 
Comment by X-GSfixr
2010-06-06 13:17:45

You guys have it all wrong.

There’s no money to be made in science and engineering, especially if you are starting out, and aren’t interested in being “management”.

The pukes with the business degrees decide where the money is spent….including on themselves.

As far as Eddie’s “talking points”……..I’ve had one daughter graduate and another going into her senior year. Other than a semester carrying around a plastic baby, they haven’t been mandated or have the option of taking any of the courses/subjects you describe. And yes, I’ve read their textbooks.

 
Comment by Rancher
2010-06-06 13:21:20

We attended the Southern Oregon University
graduation ceremony yesterday. Page after
page of liberal arts students, in total, a little
over 1,100 grads.

Eleven math and seven physics grads. Half of then were Summa cum laude and one physics grad did it in three years.

Care to take a guess who will get jobs?

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-06-06 13:25:48

Besides, what’s the point of getting a grueling degree, getting a good job and making a lot of money, when Obama and Co. will penalize you for daring to make money? Much easier to get a $20K a year job and get “free” health care, “free” mortgage assistance and free everything else, all paid for by the saps who dare to make $100K+.

This makes no sense. Don’t you say you work hard to make a lot of money? Are you lazy because of your taxes? Weren’t taxes for the rich way higher under Nixon and Eisenhower than they are now? And we graduated more engineers per capita back then?

If someone really loves to have money won’t they work hard no matter what their tax bracket is? Are your points out of a play book?

 
Comment by DennisN
2010-06-06 14:34:27

Colorado,

I have both great writing skills and great physics/math skills. You need both to become a successful patent attorney: it’s as though we have cross-wired brains. But I agree that many great engineers have poor English writing skills. Some of this is because there are great engineers now coming to the US from developing countries…..

A true story. I majored in physics in college because I hated writing term papers (back in the pre-PC no-word-processing days). I “tested out” of college English comp. classes and never took a single English class after high school. At the age of 40 I undertook going to law school. A 1L class in “legal writing and research” is standard fare in law school, and is taught pass/NC. Our instructor gave out some “advisory” grades on homework assignments, and I went in to see her after receiving only a B+ on one brief. To my astonishment she told me I shouldn’t worry and that mine was the highest grade in the class she had given. Here I was, a guy who never took a single English class after HS, performing better on a writing assignment than a class full of recent graduates with English and other liberal arts majors.

 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 14:38:15

Hey, we’re trying to destroy America here. Stop bringing up reality.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 14:41:29

The income taxes were low for most middle class people in the 1970s because incomes were low. In 1985 my first year of work, my income was $22,500 per year. Ten years earlier someone starting out of college was earning typically $10,000 per year.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:42:01

What person in their right mind gets a degree in an industry that has been, and is continuing to be, sent overseas?

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-06-06 15:16:51

“This makes no sense. Don’t you say you work hard to make a lot of money? Are you lazy because of your taxes? Weren’t taxes for the rich way higher under Nixon and Eisenhower than they are now? And we graduated more engineers per capita back then?

If someone really loves to have money won’t they work hard no matter what their tax bracket is? Are your points out of a play book?”

Ryo,

You’re a trip man. You really are.

Let’s try again:

I am a 20 year old, I have 2 options:

1. Bust my ass for 4 years getting an engineering degree. Make $100K, keep $50K after tax, get $0 in govt aid since I am “rich”.

2. Do nothing for 4 years, get BA in basket weaving, make $20K a year, pay $0 tax, get $30K in govt aid.

Both options lead to $50K a year. One option is easy, one is hard. Guess which one most people choose? The numbers speak for themselves.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-06-06 16:16:50

You’re a trip man. You really are.

Getting your clock cleaned on a regular basis is kind of trippy huh?

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2010-06-06 22:24:41

“What person in their right mind gets a degree in an industry that has been, and is continuing to be, sent overseas?”

Bingo!

I have been at a loss as to what field to recommend to my children.

Manufacturing - outsourced
Tech - outsourced
Lawyer - outsourcing in progress
Engineering - H1B, outsourcing in progress
Nursing - trends indicate insourcing in progress
Doctor - medical tourism
Trades - Insourcing
Journalism - dying
Arts - doesn’t everyone want to be an artist or musician?

 
 
Comment by pmseatac
2010-06-06 11:52:07

Comment by DennisN
2010-06-06 08:11:35

” The NY Times had a story this past week about some woman who graduated from NYU with $97K in debt and no job prospects. Funny how the article completely avoided the most important question: what did she major in? I’ll bet she didn’t major in engineering or some other “useful art”. ”

I remember the article. The major was a mix of “women’s studies” and “ethnic studies”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 16:57:35

Wow. I must be getting virtual dollars then - “there’s no money to be made in science and engineering.”

Well I will know if you are right if they fire me this week, but you are the first, X-GSfixr, who let me know.

I first heard of the demise of software engineering in the US around fifteen years ago. That is what got me out of obligations - marriage, home ownership, and so on. I’ve been renting ever since ;)

But being footloose has been to my advantage, as I can move about the USA pretty quick to get the next contract engineering gig.

For Eddie - It’s very hard to get rich being an engineer. I think that’s how X-GSfixr will get away by that quote “no money to be made in science and engineering”.

There are exceptions. I know of two multi-millionaires in the client firm I consult to. One had a good stock advisor over the years. The other invested in the company stock for over fifteen years.

Since you are starting out young, don’t let the older ones on this board get to you. Here’s a tip: In many blogs, a lot of people take sides and if they really hate one of the things you write, they will hate ALL the things you write. So if they really disagree with you on one thing, they will extrapolate that to everything you say.

In other words, I think there is still money to be made in the USA in science and engineering. I think if you find the write tech company to work in, you can get stock options and become a multi millionaire while you are still young. It happened to a guy I attended high school with. He worked for Apple Computer in the 1980s and had a million bucks of stock when he was in his mid twenties.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 19:12:29

find the write tech company to work in…

lol- techies don’t always right write

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-06-06 20:42:57

oops

 
 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-06-06 18:34:12

Link to the NY Times article:

www dot nytimes dot com/2010/05/29/your-money/student-loans/29money dot html

The woman profiled in the article graduated “with an interdisciplinary degree in religious and women’s studies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:07:56

“Uncle Sam sole lender for federal student loans”

Whenever Uncle Sam gets into the business of trying to help households ‘afford’ something (e.g., housing, a college education), two things are sure to happen:

1) Whatever they are trying to make more affordable becomes less affordable;

2) Many borrowers they tried to help out with the ‘affordable lending’ program end up hopelessly underwater with debt they will never be able to repay.

Hence I expect many more new college graduates going forward to leave college encumbered with student loans they cannot afford to repay.

Comment by REhobbyist
2010-06-06 11:55:07

I’m benefiting from the money the government is throwing at poor college students this year. Last year I paid 50% of my niece’s expenses at the University of Michigan - other half was covered by grants and scholarships. This year her brother will start engineering at Michigan State. 100% of his expenses will be covered by scholarships and grants - auntie is off the hook completely. The niece has reapplied for financial aid for her sophomore year (biochem/premed major), so we’ll see if her aid increases this year. Of course, their divorced parents are completely broke - mother has zero income, father made 25K and declared bankruptcy last year.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 09:53:08

You’re not familiar with the role of Private Equity and Big Finance, are you? Look up Sallie Mae and JC Flowers. It was the classic privatize gains including subsidies, socialize losses model.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-06-06 13:27:35

Here’s an idea: let’s bring back the draft - but only for deadbeats who stiff Uncle Sam on their student loans.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-06-06 18:38:05

Somehow I don’t think the military branches will be thrilled with the caliber of those draftees.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-06-06 06:47:27

Bank of America wants to reduce short sale gambles for itself and borrowers

By Kimberly Miller Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 7:00 p.m. Friday, June 4, 2010

AUSTIN, Texas - Short sales come with a big gamble - whether the bank will go after a borrower for the unpaid balance of the home loan.

In Florida, lenders have up to five years to file for a so-called “deficiency judgment” and 20 years to collect, leaving borrowers in limbo as to whether they’ll be pursued to pay back some of what the bank lost.

Bank of America wants to end the suspense.

Jack Schakett, Bank of America senior vice president for credit loss and mitigation strategies, said this week that if a borrower proves he can no longer pay the mortgage and has few or no assets, the bank will waive its right to a deficiency judgment during the closing of the short sale deal.

But if someone can afford to pay or has assets, the bank will try to negotiate a set fee for the borrower to pay at closing. If the borrower refuses to turn over financial information, the bank will retain its right to go after the money.

“We want to help customers who legitimately can’t afford to make payments, but we don’t want the ones who have a bunch of money to just be able to walk away,” Schakett said. “They have to share some of our pain.”

Comment by Lip
2010-06-06 09:12:35

I keep hearing that the banks are going to expedite their short sales but have yet to see any continuous improvements.

I did offer on a short sale in May and its apparently going to close to the highest bidder on June 30th, but that house was “special”.

Once these short sales start going, either by default or by the banks actually settling what they accept, the market will be flooded with homes. For those of you that have been waiting, the opportunity is just around the corner (in the next 2-5 years).

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-06-06 06:51:13

Florida’s recovery will lag nation
by Kim Miller
Stan Humphries, chief economist for housing research firm Zillow, said today that Florida will take longer to recover from the real estate recession than other states hit similarly hard by the crash.

The reason _ the number of foreclosures mired in the court system.

Humphries, who spoke at a conference in Austin, Texas of the National Association of Real Estate Editors, said some areas in California have begun to see a rebound of housing values as foreclosures are cleansed from the system.

But with an estimated half-a-million foreclosures bogged down in Florida’s courts and more home loans defaulting every day, Humphries said Florida’s improvement has stalemated.

“Florida is still such a challenging market because foreclosures are not being processed very quickly,” Humphries said. “Florida is still seeing monthly depreciation rates.”

In South Florida _ Broward, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade counties _ the Zillow Home Value Index hit a low mark in September 2008, but slowly rebounded until last fall when it flat lined.

While some states, like California, allow for non-judicial foreclosures in some cases, all of Florida’s foreclosures must go through the court system. There was a push this year to move toward a non-judicial foreclosure process, but it never made it out of the legislative committee process.

Humphries, who spoke with Douglas Duncan, vice president and chief economist at Fannie Mae, and Bob Bach, senior vice president and chief economist at Grubb & Ellis, said he expects home values for the nation to hit a bottom in the third quarter of this year, with Florida lagging a little behind.

“The bottom is going to be a long and flat affair,” said Humphries, who called consumers “overly optimistic” in their beliefs on the economic recovery. “The myth out there is the housing slump is over.”

Duncan was similarly glum, saying the housing market won’t return to a normal supply and demand status until 2013.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:29:44

And now the oil spill sliming the beaches and marine life. His target date of 2013 will move out a bit, no?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 07:30:43

Not to mention all those black oil-covered swans on the beaches.

Comment by palmetto
2010-06-06 07:45:59

The oil spill Makes me wonder if a banker or two holding shadow inventory off the market will kick themselves wishing they’d at least released some of the Gulf coast inventory. I guarantee you there are phone calls being made, even as we blog, to formerly spurned investor groups who were willing to buy blocks of foreclosures here in Florida. “uh, remember that offer you made us?”

Conversely, maybe some of those investor groups are thanking their lucky stars that the banks spurned their offers.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 19:20:02

I think this spill will be the straw that breaks many camels’ backs in the gulf coast area. As one local commenter on an article about the spill said, ‘If not for the beaches, why would most people come to Florida?’.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:10:04

This oil spill certainly gives the black swan concept a new meaning!

Comment by scdave
2010-06-06 10:03:12

That is a painful picture to look at…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-06-06 14:46:04

Everything east of the mouth of the Mississippi is finished. Gone for at least the 20 years.

Pray like hell the Atlantic coast survives.

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-06-06 08:12:01

I’m incensed this morning. First, Democrats refuse to raise down payments to a measly 5%. Then I was surprised to find out that Fannie and Freddie can require banks to buy back mortgage loans made with poor lending standards, but banks are resisting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/business/06gret.html

Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 10:17:11

but banks are resisting.

Did you expect something different?

Of course they resist. The thing I’d have a problem with is if F&F relent, rather than forcing them to take the loans back.

 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:14:08

I find it interesting how whenever a sensible GSE reform proposal is floated, so-called housing market ‘experts’ come out of the woodwork to insist it would be ‘disastrous.’

LOOK AROUND, FOOLS: WE ALREADY HAVE A GSE-ENGINEERED HOUSING MARKET DISASTER AT HAND. IT IS HIGH TIME TO STOP FOOT DRAGGING AND TO START THE RECOVERY PROCESS.

A ‘disastrous’ Republican proposal to redo Fannie and Freddie
By Annie Lowrey 5/11/10 6:24 AM Digg Tweet

Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.). Photo: EPA/ZUMApress.com

For the past year, Republicans have insisted that Congress take up legislation to stop the losses at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that buy up and repackage mortgages, keeping loan prices stable. Fannie and Freddie have incurred more than $150 billion in losses since the burst of the housing bubble.

“In my view, it’s simply not acceptable for some on the other side to suggest that we have to rush this [Wall Street] bill through Congress, but that it’s okay to wait another year to address the GSEs, which we all know played a central role in the financial crisis,” Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the minority leader, argued earlier this month, a contention often repeated.

But the Republicans never said how they thought the GSEs should be reformed — until now. Last Wednesday, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz), Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) proposed an amendment to Sen. Chris Dodd’s (D-Conn.) financial regulatory reform bill, the GSE (Government Sponsored Enterprise) Bailout Elimination and Taxpayer Protection Amendment.

Releasing the proposal — with numbers, dates and directives aplenty — Gregg commented, “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are synonymous with mismanagement and waste and have become the face of ‘too big to fail.’ The time has come to end Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s taxpayer-backed slush fund and require them to operate on a level playing field.”

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 12:46:41

“Bailout Elimination and Taxpayer Protection Amendment”

The result is usually the opposite of whatever these guys label their bills. It will probably have the effect of making bailouts permanent at taxpayers expense.

Take for instance the ‘Commodities Futures Modernization Act’ that barred the CFTC from regulating financial derivatives. It set us back 70 years, back to the depression era 30’s. Modernization?

These are the same guys that did away with the Glass-Steagall Act and embraced the home-debtorship society.

Judd Gregg?!! Come on, he’s a fed lobbyist.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-06-06 13:20:23

Where were these esteemed gentlemen when the Republicans were in control of Congress and the White House? They had all the time in the world to fix the F&F, yet they didn’t. Oh wait, it’s an election year. Can you spell hypocrisy?

Comment by juan
2010-06-06 14:07:24

Do a little google before opening your mouth. Like them or hate them these guys have been talking about F&F for a long time. They didn’t get anything done because of the Democrats in the senate. As you might have guessed, you need solid 60 senators to do anything meaningful in senate.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 19:44:32

OK, I googled it. Turns out the regulations for Fannie Mae conforming loans were relaxed during W’s administration. Surprise, surprise.

And if no one’s responsible for any legislation unless they have 60 senators, then no one’s responsible for anything that’s happened in the last 30 years- including St. Ronald Reagan.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2010-06-06 22:05:54

Turns out the regulations for Fannie Mae conforming loans were relaxed during W’s administration

Are these not controlled by congress? If so, then what matters is not who’s administration, but rather who was in congress at the time…

When were the regs relaxed? Who controlled congress?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-07 05:33:51

The regs were relaxed in 2004, under Bush, with a Republican majority in the Senate (51 to 48) and in the House (229 to 205).

 
Comment by drumminj
2010-06-07 15:24:16

The regs were relaxed in 2004, under Bush, with a Republican majority in the Senate (51 to 48) and in the House (229 to 205).

If that’s the case then we should be criticizing the republican congress, not the president at the time.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Cantankerous Intellectual Bomb-thrower
2010-06-06 09:19:38

If zero-down, funny-money loans and slipshod underwriting are eliminated, how will Uncle Sam continue to keep housing prices unaffordably out of reach for young families and other new entrants to local labor markets who wish to buy a home? Thanks to the financial reform bill, Uncle Sam’s unaffordable housing policy appears to be at risk of failure.

Financial reform bill is likely to include new protections for home buyers and mortgage applicants

By Kenneth R. Harney

June 6, 2010

Reporting from Washington — —

Although the Wall Street and banking features of the giant financial industry reform bill taking shape on Capitol Hill have drawn most of the attention, home buyers and mortgage applicants should be major winners when the legislation is finally signed into law, probably early next month.

Not only will the zero-down, funny-money loans and slipshod underwriting that triggered the housing bubble and bust be virtually eliminated from the marketplace, so will the steering practices used by loan officers to earn extra fees by putting unsuspecting borrowers into toxic mortgages.

Comment by Kim
2010-06-06 14:40:48

“Prohibition of prepayment penalties on nontraditional loans that are not fully documented, fixed rate and carry standard amortization schedules. This would prevent, for example, the sort of “gotcha” adjustable-rate mortgages of the boom years, where consumers found themselves trapped into fast-rising payments and heavy penalties if they tried to refinance early. Prepayment penalties would still be permitted on income-verified standard loans, but lenders would be required to offer alternative financing without penalties for early payoffs.”

So if I lie about my income and don’t provide documentation for my loan, I can prepay without penalty. But if I do everything right, honestly state my income, and provide W-2s and 1040s to prove it, they’ll ding me for prepaying. Way to go, Washington!

 
Comment by Jon
2010-06-06 14:45:47

Not only will the zero-down, funny-money loans and slipshod underwriting that triggered the housing bubble and bust be virtually eliminated from the marketplace, so will the steering practices used by loan officers to earn extra fees by putting unsuspecting borrowers into toxic mortgages.

If business owners want to make zero down, funny-money loans and slipshod underwriting to earn extra fees by putting unsuspecting borrower into toxic mortgages, why should big gubmint stop them? What are you, a liberal?

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 10:30:19

Merkel says, “We can only spend what we receive in income.” Let the Keynesian hand-wringing begin. Austerity is the new black … swan.

June 6 (Bloomberg) — Chancellor Angela Merkel said Germany is poised for a “decisive” round of budget cuts that will shape government policy for years to come, fueling disagreement with U.S. officials who favor measures to step up growth.

Merkel’s government is reining in its deficit and urging fellow euro-region states to do likewise to thwart a sovereign- debt crisis. The savings risk further alienating voters angry at Germany’s 148 billion-euro contribution to a European plan to backstop the euro, and clash with Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner’s June 5 call at a Group of 20 meeting for “stronger domestic demand growth” in European countries like Germany with trade surpluses.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-06-06 13:21:51

Wait and see. If unemployment climbs any higher Merkel will be out of a job.

Comment by basura
2010-06-06 22:29:05

It’s time for Angela to consult Bush/Obama on how to get reelected. Start a war like Bush or plan on buying votes like Obama? Very tough decision indeed.

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 14:24:45

Austerity is the new black … swan.

You may be right.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 11:20:59

GDP = Consumption + Business Investment + Government Spending + Net Exports.

Most of the C and BI has been induced by GS. Naturally, there is resistance to increasing NE at the expense of thy neighbor. Years and years of Monetarism, Keynesianism, and Free Trade dogma are coming undone. From the FT’s, “G20 drops support for fiscal stimulus:”

Finance ministers of the world’s leading economies have been so spooked by the sovereign debt crisis that they have decided they can no longer wait until economies are growing strongly before they remove fiscal stimulus.

The communiqué of the meeting made clear the G20 no longer thought expansionary fiscal policy was sustainable or effective in fostering recovery because investors were no longer confident about some countries’ public finances.

“Those countries with serious fiscal challenges need to accelerate the pace of consolidation,” it said. “We welcome the recent announcements by some countries to reduce their deficits in 2010 and strengthen their fiscal frameworks and institutions.”

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-06-06 11:52:43

And so, the hand-wringing to austerity measures has begun. Never mind, some of these sovereigns don’t have and can’t borrow new moneys. They can only print it, of course. Never mind, the botched banking bailout and the ongoing political blow-back. From Mr. Paul “The Keynesian” Krugman’s, “Lost Decade, Here We Come,” blog:

It’s basically incredible that this is happening with unemployment in the euro area still rising, and only slight labor market progress in the US.

But don’t we need to worry about government debt? Yes — but slashing spending while the economy is still deeply depressed is both an extremely costly and quite ineffective way to reduce future debt. Costly, because it depresses the economy further; ineffective, because by depressing the economy, fiscal contraction now reduces tax receipts. A rough estimate right now is that cutting spending by 1 percent of GDP raises the unemployment rate by .75 percent compared with what it would otherwise be, yet reduces future debt by less than 0.5 percent of GDP.

The right thing, overwhelmingly, is to do things that will reduce spending and/or raise revenue after the economy has recovered — specifically, wait until after the economy is strong enough that monetary policy can offset the contractionary effects of fiscal austerity. But no: the deficit hawks want their cuts while unemployment rates are still at near-record highs and monetary policy is still hard up against the zero bound.

 
Comment by juan
2010-06-06 12:39:38

The right thing, overwhelmingly, is to do things that will reduce spending and/or raise revenue after the economy has recovered

I bet he also believes in unicorns…

 
Comment by HottyToddy
2010-06-06 17:59:27

I can’t believe more people on this blog, of all places, are not disturbed by a Senator who does not think it prudent to have at least a 5% down payment on a home. To say we should not restrict homeownership to only people “who can afford it” is grounds for immediate removal of anyone who agrees with him.
Until we return to the days where the majority of people believe that you cannot afford a home until you can put 20% or more down, have an emergency fund after that and have the resulting payment be a reasonable percentage of your income, this country will be a complete economic disaster.
Owning a home is not now and will never be a right. It is something we earn.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-06-06 18:48:00

I can’t believe more people on this blog, of all places, are not disturbed by a Senator who does not think it prudent to have at least a 5% down payment on a home.

We’re disturbed. But this stuff is beyond parody at this point.

Comment by technovelist
2010-06-06 19:57:46

passage of such a requirement would restrict home ownership to only those who can afford it

I think that actually was from a satirical blog. I can’t find an original version in the MSM (although maybe that doesn’t mean anything).

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-06-06 20:02:45

Can anyone provide a link to this story that doesn’t go to some cheesy right-wing blog? Or is it a load of $%&@#?

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2010-06-06 19:13:00

“I can’t believe more people on this blog, of all places, are not disturbed by a Senator who does not think it prudent to have at least a %5 down payment on a home.”

Wait until after the November elections before you decide just how many people are disturbed.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2010-06-06 18:54:39

U.S.’s $13 Trillion Debt Poised to Overtake GDP: Chart of Day

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aa0cI64Gx.4E&pos=15

 
Comment by cactus
2010-06-06 21:51:17

TOKYO (AP) — Asian stock markets tumbled Monday, dragged down by weak U.S. employment figures and fresh fears that Europe’s debt crisis could spread as Hungary scrambled to calm worries that the nation is close to defaulting on its debts.

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average plunged 396.95 points, or 4 percent, to 9,504.24 with investors also cautious before Japan’s new leader, Naoto Kan, forms his Cabinet on Tuesday.

South Korea’s Kospi lost 2.6 percent to 1,621.67 while Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 was down 3.1 percent at 4,335.90.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng dropped 2.9 percent to 19,211.67. Benchmarks in mainland China, Singapore and Taiwan also fell

 
Comment by Green Shoots
2010-06-06 22:14:14

With such pervasive pessimism permeating the pool of stock market investors, I am thinking this might be a good time to buy the dip.

BTW, the Euro was at about $1.18 in 1999.

* The Wall Street Journal
* ABREAST OF THE MARKET
* JUNE 7, 2010

Markets Brace for Rocky Week
By MARK GONGLOFF

Markets are bracing for another rocky week as finance ministers around the world ready new defenses to keep the sovereign-debt crisis from spreading. Asian markets opened Monday sharply lower, and the euro continued to slide.

On Monday, European finance ministers expect to sign off on a €440 billion ($527 billion) loan package to act as protection against the debt crisis that began in Greece earlier this year and now imperils other countries. Separately, top finance officials from the Group of 20 major industrial and developing economies are nearing agreement on new rules to make sure that major banks keep enough money in reserve to insulate them against future crises.
[ABREAST]

The precarious state of the world economy was underscored by a sudden crisis in Hungary, after politicians there said the country might be forced to default on its debt. Hungarian officials spent the weekend devising a fiscal plan after the country saw runs on both its currency and its debt Friday. Officials have backtracked on the default threats and pledged the country would cut spending instead.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average slid 3.2% Friday to its lowest level since early February. Investors were jolted by a disappointing employment report in the U.S. and by the Hungary news, which weakened the euro to below $1.20 for the first time in more than four years.

The euro fell further Monday morning trading in Asia, falling against the dollar to as low as $1.1884. The euro hit its lowest level in more than eight years against the yen at 108.83 yen.

 
Comment by Green Shoots
2010-06-06 22:22:55

* The Wall Street Journal
* ESSAY
* JUNE 5, 2010

Betting on the Bad Guys
Cartoonist Scott Adams’s personal road to riches: Put your money on the companies that you hate the most

By SCOTT ADAMS

When I heard that BP was destroying a big portion of Earth, with no serious discussion of cutting their dividend, I had two thoughts: 1) I hate them, and 2) This would be an excellent time to buy their stock. And so I did. Although I should have waited a week.

People ask me how it feels to take the side of moral bankruptcy. Answer: Pretty good! Thanks for asking. How’s it feel to be a disgruntled victim?

I have a theory that you should invest in the companies that you hate the most. The usual reason for hating a company is that the company is so powerful it can make you balance your wallet on your nose while you beg for their product. Oil companies such as BP don’t actually make you beg for oil, but I think we all realize that they could. It’s implied in the price of gas.

I hate BP, but I admire them too, in the same way I respect the work ethic of serial killers. I remember the day I learned that BP was using a submarine…with a web cam…a mile under the sea…to feed live video of their disaster to the world. My mind screamed “STOP TRYING TO MAKE ME LOVE YOU! MUST…THINK…OF DEAD BIRDS TO MAINTAIN ANGER!” The geeky side of me has a bit of a crush on them, but I still hate them for turning Florida into a dip stick.

Apparently BP has its own navy, a small air force, and enough money to build floating cities on the sea, most of which are still upright. If there’s oil on the moon, BP will be the first to send a hose into space and suck on the moon until it’s the size of a grapefruit. As an investor, that’s the side I want to be on, with BP, not the loser moon.

I’d like to see a movie in which James Bond tries to defeat BP, but in the end they run Bond through a machine that turns him into “junk shot” debris to seal a leaky well. I’m just saying you don’t always have to root for Bond. Be flexible.

Perhaps you think it’s absurd to invest in companies just because you hate them. But let’s compare my method to all of the other ways you could decide where to invest.

 
Comment by Green Shoots
2010-06-06 22:27:24

With so much easy money flooding the market and a Fed commitment to keep it there for the indefinite future, shouldn’t stocks only be going up?

The Fed must foresee a financial disaster looming ahead, as a few months back, all the talk was of economic recovery and the attendant need to withdraw stimulus.

* The Wall Street Journal
* MARKETS
* JUNE 7, 2010

Easy Money to Stick Around
Fed Unlikely to Raise Rates as Euro-Zone Crisis Keeps Pressure on Economy; Risk of a ‘Tail Event’

By JON HILSENRATH

Investors spent much of early 2010 wondering when Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke would start to tighten financial conditions to rein in the substantial support to the U.S. economy. Instead, Europe is doing the job for him.

European Union debt woes have given Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, in Detroit last week, a likely reprieve from having to raise rates.

Worries about the 16-nation euro zone’s financial turmoil has pushed U.S. stocks lower and the dollar higher, made risky debt in the U.S. costlier compared with less-risky debt, inflated interest rates for the short-term loans that banks make to one another and helped slow down the issuance of commercial paper.

As a result of that, along with meager job growth and low inflation, the odds that Mr. Bernanke will soon reverse the easy-money policies that have greased the wheels of the financial system since the crisis began are far smaller than they seemed just a few months ago.

“I don’t think economic conditions yet call for it,” Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, said in an interview.

James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said the latest signs of strain are reinforcing the central bank’s cautious economic outlook. “You’ve got more risk out there of a tail event occurring,” he said in an interview.

Comment by combotechie
2010-06-07 04:03:03

“With so much easy money flooding the market and a Fed commitment to keep it there for the indifinite future, shouldn’t stocks only be going up?”

Money may be easy but that doesn’t necessairly mean money is flooding the market.

If money was really flooding the market then there wouldn’t be such a shortage of the stuff.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post