From Housing Bubble To ‘Reverse Contagion’
As more evidence arrives that the global housing bubble is bursting, the worlds’ economists ask, what’s next? “Rising eurozone interest rates could spell the end of the ‘great European housing boom,’ according to a report issued on Tuesday. The study said, ‘If the ECB does follow expectations and raise interest rates further, the implications for European housing markets could be substantial. The end of the boom may be in sight,’ the report concluded.”
“Analysts fear the cycle will turn as rising interest rates in America, Europe and, soon, Japan choke off global liquidity. Andy Xie, an economist at Morgan Stanley, said the ‘bubble’ could burst this year. ‘It may take just one event to trigger reverse momentum,’ he said.”
“The world economy certainly seems to be turning upside down. Ex-Communist Poland is now so credit-worthy it can raise international capital more cheaply than the US. ‘We no longer face a risk of Russia or Mexico blowing up: it’s the US housing market we need to worry about,’ Philip Poole, an economist at HSBC said.”
“Poole said the world had changed so far over the past decade, the next crisis may well be one of ‘reverse contagion’ originating from the mature economies.”
Paul L. Kasriel has this, “If we do have a housing bust, and we likely will if Bernanke does not soon declare a ceasefire, then the cutback in spending by (the) unemployed would have a, excuse the Keynesian expression, multiplier effect on total spending in the economy, adding some homeowners not associated with the residential real estate industry to the length of the unemployment lines.”
“A slowdown in consumer spending emanating from a busted housing market would lead to an increase in unemployment, which would have further knock-on effects to consumer spending and unemployment. Our smug homeowner might find himself in the unemployment line.”
“Housing today is more highly leveraged than it was in 1989, just before the last bicoastal housing bust occurred. Today the housing leverage ratio is about 43%. In 1989, the leverage was about 35%. Between 40% and 50% of new mortgage debt applied for in the past two years has had an adjustable-rate element to it. Back in 1990, only about 10% of new mortgage debt was of an adjustable rate nature. A lot of these adjustable-rate borrowers in the past two years are in the ’sub-prime’ category or are speculators. In either case, they probably have little equity in their homes.”
“It has been estimated approximately $600 billion of sub-prime adjustable rate mortgages will reprice over the next two years. Chances are mortgage defaults will be on the rise with these repricings. This will put ‘repos’ on the market, which will depress home prices. Speculators, with negative cash flows and slower or no appreciation in their investment properties, also will add to the glut of homes for sale.”
“Again, so what if mortgage defaults are on the rise? U.S. commercial banks have a record exposure to the mortgage market. About 62% of bank earning assets are mortgage-related. History tells us that a crippled banking system renders central banks less potent in combating economic downturns and promoting robust recoveries.”
“In other words, if a housing bust led to large credit losses to the banking system, Chairman Bernanke could cut the fed funds rate to 1% and be surprised that a low interest rate did not have the same magic for him as it had for his predecessor.”
“A housing bust..will give renters a lower price point at which to become homeowners. Yes, unless they are in the unemployment line too.”