California Sales ‘Plunge’, Inventory At Multi-Year High
The California realtors have their February numbers out. “Existing-home sales dropped significantly in California in February, falling 15.5 percent from the same period a year ago, as inventory levels climbed and median prices continued to escalate, an industry trade group reported today. Meanwhile, the February 2006 median price of an existing home in the state decreased 2.9 percent compared with January’s $551,300 median price.”
“‘Unsold inventory rose again in February to a 6.7 month supply, one of the highest inventory levels in several years,’ said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young. CAR also released the following regional sales and price comparisons for February: Santa Clara sales dropped 15.3 percent year-to-year. Sales in Santa Cruz County dropped 23.6 percent year-to-year but were up 0.9 percent from January, while the median price declined 2.5 percent to $712,000 from February 2005.”
“Monterey County sales dropped 16 percent year-to-year but rose 18.3 percent from January. San Francisco Bay Area sales dropped 12.3 percent year-to-year.”
The state’s builders think the solution is more construction. “‘We may be producing some of America’s best college graduates, but we’re exporting them to states where owning a home is more than just a fantasy,’ said Alan Nevin, chief economist at the California Building Industry Association. The state’s 57 percent homeownership rate, the second lowest behind New York, lags far behind the national average of nearly 70 percent.”
“Metropolitan Sacramento needs 62,619 more homes than the thousands already planned to bring the region’s homeownership rate up to the national average, a statewide home-builder trade group said Wednesday. The report..is the latest move in the ongoing battle between the home-building industry and environmentalists and citizens groups weary of what they say is relentless growth.”
“Builders say their suggestion is aimed at easing the sticker shock of California and capital-area home prices by increasing the housing supply. ‘Today, there’s more than a $300,000 difference between home pricing nationally and in California,’ said CBIA Chief Economist Alan Nevin. At least half the extra homes suggested by the CBIA could come from converting apartments to for-sale condominiums, Nevin said.”
Rich Toscano questions the demand side. “It is the rallying cry of the San Diego housing bull: ‘Everyone wants to live here.’ The crux of the argument is this: data be damned; San Diego’s pleasant climate and general desirability will ward off any potential decline in home prices. There are some problems with the “everyone-wants-to-live-here” school of housing analysis. After all, the weather was awfully nice back in 2000. Yet the median San Diego home price has doubled since that time. Has it really gotten that much more pleasant in the past six years?”
“The theory also begs a more practical question. If everyone wants to live here, why are so many people moving away? San Diego County’s population fell between July 2004 and July 2005. The population decrease should have come as no surprise. For the past five years there has been a very clear trend in declining population growth.”
“The primary reason for the out-migration couldn’t be more clear. Homes are simply too expensive in comparison to incomes. And as housing has become pricier, more and more people have left. San Diego is indeed a great place to live, but nowhere on earth is so wonderful that people will pay any price to buy a home there.”
“While the desire to live here may be an unlimited quantity, the means to live here is not. This exodus is a natural result of the housing bubble, and is one of the factors ensuring that housing will one day be affordable again.”