The Policy Is Paradoxical
Some weekend reading from The Whig by Geoffrey Johnston. “Knowledge of past financial crises does not necessarily give policy-makers the ability or wisdom to avoid every pitfall or systemic problem that could lead to a future financial meltdown. However, there is no denying that possessing a firm grasp of financial history could help politicians and central bankers to better understand the perils of lax monetary policy, asset bubbles and mania.”
“‘History shows that even modest financial crises cause horrific pain,’ writes Timothy Geithner in Stress Test, the definitive first-hand account of the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009. Geithner served as president of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York during the financial meltdown and went on to become President Barack Obama’s secretary of the treasury. ‘Financial rescue, fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus — along with the president’s efforts to prop up the beleaguered auto and housing sectors — would all have to work together, if they were to work at all,’ Geithner explains in Stress Test.”
“According to Geithner, ‘the long period of low interest rates in the United States and worldwide helped fuel the crises, because it helped fuel the mania that inflated the bubble, encouraging more borrowing, more homebuilding, more risk-taking.’ The stage was set for a catastrophic collapse of the financial system. ‘When the panic hit and the run gained momentum,’ writes Geithner, ‘we did not have the ability to protect the economy until conditions were scary enough to provoke action by Congress.’”
The Daily Progress. “Even though homeowners overall are gaining wealth, the home-ownership rate is at a 50-year low, according to National Association of REALTORS Chief Economis Lawrence Yun. ‘I think that in itself is leading to large anxiety, especially among the younger population, about what does it mean to acquire the American dream,’ Yun said. ‘People have always associated ownership with the American dream, but that is changing because people can no longer become homeowners because mortgage availability is difficult, and home prices are just not affordable anymore.’”
“In 1983, the median net worth of a household headed by someone under 35 was $15,260, and for a household headed by someone over 65, it was $120,500. In 2013, younger households had a median net worth of $10,500, while older households had a median net worth of $210,000.”
“‘You say that’s fine, and maybe that is fine, because it takes time to build wealth,’ Yun said. ‘Younger people are not building wealth at a young age. But look at 2013, for older people it has grown. They have their home, they have some stock. For younger people, it has actually declined, so [there’s] wider wealth inequality now than before.’”
From MarketWatch by Satyajit Das. “In the last few decades, a succession of property booms and busts have been at the heart of financial and economic crises in advanced economies. A central factor is that housing now is no longer considered ’shelter’ but a ‘financial asset’ promoted and encouraged by official policy. In the 1980s, the replacement of company or government-funded retirement plans with self-funded arrangements meant houses became a means for wealth creation. Homeowners began treating their properties as automated teller machines from which they extract cash.”
“Reliance on houses as a store of wealth creates exposure to volatile house prices. As the global financial crisis illustrated, prices can be affected by a confluence of adverse events — economic cycles, the availability of credit and demographics where large cohorts may retire at the same time. Price fluctuations are exacerbated by the illiquidity of the asset.”
“Many economies rely excessively on the housing market. In ‘The Age of Turbulence,’ Alan Greenspan approvingly quotes economics columnist Robert Samuelson’s assessment of his policies in the early 2000s: ‘The housing boom saved the economy…Americans went on a real estate orgy. [Americans] traded up, tore down and added on.’”
“The policy is paradoxical. If it succeeds, higher house prices ironically make housing unaffordable for large portions of the population. Where the policy fails, an unwinding housing bubble is difficult to manage. It leads to several simultaneous adverse outcomes, which feed each other in a difficult-to-control negative spiral.”
“Sadly, policy makers appear to have learned little from the past. Since 2009, government and central-bank policies, especially low interest rates, in countries as varied as the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand and China have created conditions for rapid increases in property prices. Surveying the approach, Andrew Oswald, an economics professor at Warwick University in the U.K., observed: ‘We’re stoking up a huge bubble. It’s quite extraordinary. We virtually ruined the Western world by having high house price inflation and now we’re determined to do it again.’”
“Albert Einstein famously observed that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is a sign of insanity. The current housing market illustrates this vividly.”