A Sense That An Era Has Passed In California
The Sacramento Bee reports from California. “Happily shucking its farm-town image, Lincoln embraced suburbia during the Sacramento area’s great housing boom. Its population tripled. Master-planned communities sprang up and prices hit blue-sky territory. Then things went sour in what had been California’s fastest-growing city. Home sales fell, prices plummeted and foreclosures grew, just as they did almost everywhere in California’s interior.”
“Since 2000 Lincoln’s population has more than tripled, to 37,410. In 2006 Lincoln grew by 23 percent compared to its 2005 population, faster than any other city in California. In 2004 and 2005, it captured a resounding 43 percent of Placer County’s population growth.”
“‘We looked at it and said, ‘That’s the way Sacramento is growing, people will be wanting to move out there,’ said Evan Weinzinger, a data-center manager from Vacaville who bought a home for $508,000 in Lincoln two years ago as an investment with his wife, Angela.”
“Some 14 percent of the homes sold in Lincoln in 2005 were purchased by investors like the Weinzingers, who schooled themselves by attending real estate seminars and watching cable-TV reality shows like ‘Flip This House.’ They bought a home in Texas and one on Keswick Court in Lincoln Crossing.”
“The Texas property is doing well. But the four-bedroom home on Keswick is another matter. The Weinzingers never found a tenant for it, maxed out their credit cards to meet the $2,900 monthly mortgage payments and lost the place to foreclosure in March. It’s listed for $389,900.”
“‘It’s brand new,’ Weinzinger said. ‘No one’s ever lived in it.’”
“Keswick Court and the adjacent Keswick Lane are one of many lost precincts of Lincoln, neighborhoods that have become pockmarked with vacancies and ‘For Sale’ signs. More than two dozen homes are for sale or rent within a half mile of the Weinzingers’ place. At least a half dozen were foreclosed.”
“For now, there’s a sense that an era has passed. Current and former residents say Lincoln used to feel more alive, prosperous, teeming with young families.”"‘It’s kind of turning into a little ghost town, isn’t it?’ said David Ladd, who lost his home on Keswick to foreclosure in August. He and his wife moved back to Redding.”
“Josh and Tiffanie Marone are bewildered by what’s happened. ‘We’ve seen a lot of people come and go, which is sad – we just love this neighborhood,’ Josh said. ‘These are houses that sold for $500,000 to $600,000 two years ago. … It blows my mind that they’re just sitting empty.’”
“The Marones have put their house up for sale, too, so they can move to a rural setting in Loomis. They’re braced for a loss: The house cost them $529,000, plus $130,000 on a backyard pond and other upgrades. They’ve listed it for $525,000.”
“The downturn in Lincoln has been swift. Just 1,265 homes have sold this year, half as many as in 2006. Foreclosures have claimed another 217 properties, according to Foreclosures.com of Folsom. The median new-home price – $429,000 – is off 18 percent in two years, says DataQuick.”
The Novato Advance. “The sub-prime mortgage market crash has hit Novato hard, from the closure of GreenPoint Mortgages, one of the city’s largest employers, to increases in foreclosure rates. Real estate offices have predicted a decline in business, as housing prices have fallen.”
“But two responses by the federal government, a proposed targeted rate freeze, and new lending restrictions being reviewed by the Federal Reserve, offer hope to homeowners facing ballooning rate hikes, and of avoiding a similar market situation in the future.”
“Kevin Stein, associate director of the California Reinvestment Coalition, said that the current situation made some of the Federal Reserve’s restrictions on risky loans a moot point at present.”
“‘These loans are not being made so much anymore, as investors aren’t willing to buy them,’ he said.”
“Michael Conway, vice president of Mortgage Lending with the Redwood Credit Union, said a certain segment of housing-market losers were not covered by the Bush plan’s protections for a reason. ‘(The plan) is not an investor bailout,’ he said. ‘Nobody’s sympathetic to absentee landlords who bought (houses) with no money down.’”
The North County Times. “San Diego’s home prices tumbled more in October than those in any major metropolitan area in the nation. Prices fell by 2.6 percent from September, the highest month-to-month decrease of the 20 metropolitan areas surveyed for Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller Home Price Indices. Local prices dropped more than 11 percent from October 2006, fourth-highest in the nation.”
“The local depreciation was less severe than just three cities: Miami, Tampa, Fla. and Detroit.”
“Eli Tene, founder of a Woodland Hills-based firm that deals in distressed properties across the country, said the biggest drop in prices has come since October and has not yet shown up on the Case-Shiller index.”
“A local home purchased in October 2006 for $500,000 would now cost, on average, about $445,000. Most real estate agents and analysts said they expect the decline to continue well into 2008.”
“The year-over-year fall and 2.6 percent month-to-month drop were both record declines for San Diego since Case-Shiller started its reports in 1988. It also represented the region’s 16th straight month of price decline.”
“‘I think San Diego is taking it on the chin, and I think we’ll take the hit hardest early and recover sooner, which isn’t a bad thing,’ said Dan Holbrook, president of a Carlsbad-based real estate consultant firm.”
“San Diego’s low-end homes — those priced under $462,003 — have suffered the most from the housing recession, dropping almost 18 percent over the last year. That means a home purchased for $450,000 in 2006 now sells for less than $370,000.”
“The index for high-end homes — priced more than $666,652 — have been the most stable, falling 5.8 percent over the same time, meaning a home worth $1 million a year ago is now worth a little more than $940,000.”
“‘Each month we look for a little bit of light at the end of the tunnel and it’s just not there. And the fact that we saw multiple new lows shows that we’re at the very least at the bottom or that we have not reached the bottom yet,’ said Maureen Maitland, VP of Standard & Poor’s index analysis.”
“Most real estate agents agree that prices will continue to fall through next year. Tene expects to see a larger decline in home prices than many agents’ forecasts: up to 20 percent over the next eight months.”
“‘It’s not like it’s getting better any time soon. Even when we get to the bottom, it’s going to be flat for a year or two. We’re really five years away from prices going up again,’ Tene said.”
The Fontana Herald news. “Land prices have plunged as low as 50 percent in some areas of the Inland Empire to reach levels not seen since 2002, according to a report released recently by The Hoffman Company, a leading land brokerage firm that tracks land values in the region.”
“In San Bernardino County, the smallest reduction in value is in Fontana at 27.1 percent and the largest is in Highland at 48.9 percent. The largest decline in Riverside County is a 52.1 percent drop in French Valley (near Murietta) and the smallest decline is in Moreno Valley at 36.1 percent.”
“It is not only outlying areas such as Hemet and Adelanto that are hard hit. Even in Corona, average lot prices have dropped from $300,000 to $180,000.”
“‘The decline in the price of land has happened rapidly; in the past two years we’ve lost five years of appreciation,’ said Norm Scheel, a principal with The Hoffman Company. ‘We may see prices drop a few more percentage points in the first half of 2008, but land values already have taken the ‘big hit’ and whatever comes next will be minor in comparison.’”
“In Riverside County, The Hoffman Company report shows values for finished lots have fallen from their 2005 highs by an average 42 percent, down 5 percent from a September report by Hoffman. In Corona, for example, values have fallen 40 percent from a $300,000 peak.”
“In 14 cities surveyed in San Bernardino County, the estimated lot values have fallen by an average of 37 percent. Chino shows a drop of 45.7 percent from the finished lot cost of $350,000 two years ago.”
“‘The value of land in California is being set by land investors and speculators,’ Scheel said. ‘After months of stalemate, it’s suddenly a competitive environment. The price expectations of buyers and sellers are much closer today than a year ago.’”
“‘Right now, most of the buyers are individuals using their own money,’ Scheel said. ‘They feel the land market could still drift down a bit, but the risk of waiting is greater. Getting in too late has them competing with Wall Street money that could run up land prices.’”
“A lot of attention has been focused on falling home prices and foreclosures, but that overlooks the other side of the equation, said Tom Dallape, the other principal of The Hoffman Company.”
“For example, finished lots in Fontana were selling for $240,000 at their peak and new homes were selling at $570,000, which was roughly 2.4 times the value of the land. Today, the estimated lot value in Fontana is $175,000. For a builder to realize the same profit margin, a home on that lot could be sold for $415,000.”
“‘That’s good news if you are a prospective homebuyer, but bad news for builders with existing lots and standing inventory, which also applies to homeowners who bought at the height of the market a few years ago,’ Dallape said.”